pith. sign in

arxiv: 2410.00165 · v3 · pith:E6G4BAM7new · submitted 2024-09-30 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Static structure factor and the dispersion of the Girvin-MacDonald-Platzman density mode for fractional quantum Hall fluids on the Haldane sphere

Rakesh K. Dora , Ajit C. Balram This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 19:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords fractional quantum HallGMP modeHaldane spherestatic structure factorJain statesneutral excitationsdensity mode dispersion
0
0 comments X

The pith

On the Haldane sphere the Girvin-MacDonald-Platzman density mode accurately describes the long-wavelength dynamics of primary Jain states.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper computes the energy cost of neutral density fluctuations in fractional quantum Hall fluids by applying the GMP density operator to the uniform ground state on the Haldane sphere. It extracts the mode dispersion from the ground-state static structure factor calculated in the same spherical geometry. The authors first derive the algebra satisfied by lowest-Landau-level projected density operators on the sphere, which is needed to evaluate the mode energy. In the long-wavelength limit this GMP mode reproduces the expected dynamics of the primary Jain states, in contrast to earlier plane-geometry results. The calculation covers both bosonic and fermionic states.

Core claim

Using the static structure factor computed directly on the Haldane sphere, the GMP density-mode dispersion is obtained for many bosonic and fermionic fractional quantum Hall states. The algebra of lowest-Landau-level projected density operators is derived on the sphere, and the long-wavelength limit of the resulting dispersion accurately matches the dynamics of the primary Jain states.

What carries the argument

The Girvin-MacDonald-Platzman density operator acting on the uniform ground state, whose dispersion is fixed by the static structure factor through the derived spherical GMP algebra.

If this is right

  • The GMP mode supplies a reliable description of long-wavelength neutral excitations for primary Jain states when the sphere geometry is used.
  • Sphere-based calculations remove the discrepancies previously reported for the same states in the plane.
  • Both bosonic and fermionic fractional quantum Hall states are treated uniformly by the same static-structure-factor method.
  • The spherical GMP algebra enables systematic extraction of density-mode dispersions without plane-specific adjustments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The improved long-wavelength agreement may indicate that spherical curvature better approximates real finite-size samples than flat-plane calculations.
  • The method could be applied to test whether GMP modes remain accurate for non-Jain fractional quantum Hall states at other fillings.
  • Microwave or inelastic light-scattering experiments that probe long-wavelength neutral modes could use the sphere-derived dispersion as a quantitative benchmark.

Load-bearing premise

The ground-state static structure factor computed on the sphere is sufficiently accurate to determine the long-wavelength GMP dispersion without higher-Landau-level or finite-size corrections.

What would settle it

Exact diagonalization of the neutral excitation spectrum for a primary Jain state on the sphere at system sizes large enough to reach the long-wavelength regime, compared directly against the GMP dispersion curve.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2410.00165 by Ajit C. Balram, Rakesh K. Dora.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Validation of the GMP algebra on a sphere [see Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Comparison of the LLL Coulomb GMP gaps obtained in three different ways: ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Comparison of the LLL Coulomb GMP and composite fermion exciton (CFE) gaps for states in the primary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The long-wavelength ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: LLL Coulomb GMP gap computed in the planar geometry for primary Jain states using the coefficient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: (a) Thermodynamic extrapolation of the density-corrected background subtracted per-particle LLL [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Panels ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Panels ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Comparison of the fitted and computed pair-correlation function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the neutral excitations in the bulk of the fractional quantum Hall (FQH) fluids generated by acting with the Girvin-MacDonald-Platzman (GMP) density operator on the uniform ground state. Creating these density modulations atop the ground state costs energy, since any density fluctuation in the FQH system has a gap stemming from underlying interparticle interactions. We calculate the GMP density-mode dispersion for many bosonic and fermionic FQH states on the Haldane sphere using the ground state static structure factor computed on the same geometry. Previously, this computation was carried out on the plane. Analogous to the GMP algebra of the lowest Landau level (LLL) projected density operators in the plane, we derive the algebra for the LLL-projected density operators on the sphere, which facilitates the computation of the density-mode dispersion. Contrary to previous results on the plane, we find that, in the long-wavelength limit, the GMP mode accurately describes the dynamics of the primary Jain states.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper derives the algebra satisfied by LLL-projected density operators on the Haldane sphere and employs the ground-state static structure factor computed on the same geometry to obtain the GMP density-mode dispersion for multiple bosonic and fermionic FQH states. It reports that, in contrast to prior planar calculations, the long-wavelength limit of this dispersion accurately captures the dynamics of the primary Jain states.

Significance. If the central claim holds after finite-size checks, the work would establish a geometry-dependent validity of the GMP single-mode approximation for Jain states and supply a reusable spherical GMP algebra. The explicit derivation of the spherical commutators is a clear technical asset that enables the computation.

major comments (1)
  1. [Results section on Jain-state dispersions (long-wavelength limit)] The long-wavelength claim for primary Jain states is load-bearing and rests on S(q) evaluated at the smallest accessible wave-vectors (q ~ 1/R) for finite N. Because these minimal q values scale with system size, any unaccounted 1/N or curvature corrections to S(q) enter directly into the dispersion through the algebra derived in the paper; the manuscript must demonstrate convergence under explicit finite-size extrapolation or by presenting data for several N to substantiate that the reported agreement is not an artifact of the spherical geometry.
minor comments (1)
  1. Figure captions and text should explicitly state the range of system sizes used for each state and whether any extrapolation procedure was applied to the small-q data.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting the importance of finite-size convergence in supporting the central claim. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The long-wavelength claim for primary Jain states is load-bearing and rests on S(q) evaluated at the smallest accessible wave-vectors (q ~ 1/R) for finite N. Because these minimal q values scale with system size, any unaccounted 1/N or curvature corrections to S(q) enter directly into the dispersion through the algebra derived in the paper; the manuscript must demonstrate convergence under explicit finite-size extrapolation or by presenting data for several N to substantiate that the reported agreement is not an artifact of the spherical geometry.

    Authors: We agree that the long-wavelength agreement for primary Jain states requires explicit demonstration of robustness under finite-size scaling. In the revised manuscript we will add GMP dispersion curves computed for multiple system sizes N (at least three values per state) together with a finite-size extrapolation of the long-wavelength slope to the thermodynamic limit. This will confirm that the reported agreement is not an artifact of the smallest accessible q on the sphere. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: dispersion obtained from independently computed S(q) via newly derived sphere algebra

full rationale

The paper computes the ground-state static structure factor S(q) on the Haldane sphere (presumably via exact diagonalization or similar) and inserts it into an algebra for LLL-projected density operators that is derived in the present work. The long-wavelength GMP dispersion is then obtained directly from this combination. No equation reduces the target dispersion to a fit, a self-definition, or a prior self-citation chain; the sphere result is contrasted with plane results precisely because the geometry-specific algebra and S(q) are new inputs. Finite-size caveats exist but are orthogonal to circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms beyond the standard assumption that the LLL projection remains valid on the sphere.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Lowest-Landau-level projection of density operators remains valid on the Haldane sphere.
    Invoked when deriving the sphere version of the GMP algebra.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5719 in / 1112 out tokens · 19013 ms · 2026-05-23T19:48:22.471872+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Non-Perturbative SDiff Covariance of Fractional Quantum Hall Excitations

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The effective Maxwell-Chern-Simons theory for FQH excitations admits a non-perturbative unitary SDiff-equivariant construction that is nevertheless non-differentiable.

  2. Theory of magnetoroton bands in moir\'e materials

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The authors derive an effective Hamiltonian for magnetoroton modes in moiré FQH and FCI systems via single-mode approximation and Monte Carlo three-point density correlations, predicting THz absorption trends and a so...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

113 extracted references · 113 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Evaluation of Oσ L,M Ψν The expectation value of Oσ L,M [see Eq. (A8)] in the LLL projected FQH ground state |Ψν⟩ is de- termined from the expectation value of the constituent LL operators h χσ l1,m1 i† χσ l2,m2, which is given by h χσ l1,m1 i† χσ l2,m2 Ψν =¯νδl1,Q δl2,Q δm1,m2. This follows from the fact that the state |Ψν⟩ resides entirely in the LLL, a...

    work page

  2. [2]

    cost function

    Evaluation of ¯Oσ L,M Ψν To evaluate ¯Oσ L,M Ψν [see Eq. (A9)], we use D χσ m2 † χσ m3 E Ψν =¯νδm2,m3 [see Appendix A 1] to obtain ¯Oσ L,M Ψν = N 2Q + 1 X m1,m2 Bm1,m2 L,M C m1,m2 L,M . (A19) The integrals in Bm1,m2 L,M [see Eq. (A10)] and C m1,m2 L,M [see Eq. (A11)] are evaluated using Eq. (6) from the main text by noting that h Y Q Q,m(Ω) i∗ =(−1)Q+m Y ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    cost function

    Fermionic Laughlin, Jain, and Moore-Read states This section will present results on the Coulomb ground state energies and average pair amplitudes ⟨Vm⟩ of the fermionic FQH states. The thermodynamic extrapolation of the per-particle density-corrected and background sub- tracted Coulomb energy is presented in Fig. 6( a), for various FQH states, including, ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Bosonic Laughlin and Moore-Read states Here we present the average bare energies (without background subtraction) of the Vm-only interaction, where m is even, for bosonic FQH states. In Fig. 6( d), we show the thermodynamic extrapolation of the energy of Vm=δm,0 (referred to as the V0) interaction for the νb=1 Moore-Read state [green solid hexagons]. The ...

    work page

  5. [5]

    D. C. Tsui, H. L. Stormer, and A. C. Gossard, Two- dimensional magnetotransport in the extreme quantum limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1559 (1982)

    work page 1982

  6. [6]

    Ground-state degeneracy of the fractional quantum hall states in the presence of a ran- dom potential and on high-genus riemann surfaces,

    X.-G. Wen, Topological orders and edge excitations in fractional quantum Hall states, Advances in Physics 44, 405 (1995), http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00018739500101566

    work page doi:10.1080/00018739500101566 1995

  7. [7]

    R. B. Laughlin, Anomalous quantum Hall effect: An 29 0 5 10 15 20 25 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0 5 10 15 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0 5 10 15 20 25 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0 5 10 15 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0 5 10 15 20 25 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0 5 10 15 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0 5 10 15 20 25 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0 5 10 15 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0 5 10 1...

    work page 1983

  8. [8]

    B. I. Halperin, Statistics of quasiparticles and the hi- erarchy of fractional quantized Hall states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1583 (1984)

    work page 1984

  9. [9]

    Arovas, J

    D. Arovas, J. R. Schrieffer, and F. Wilczek, Fractional statistics and the quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 722 (1984)

    work page 1984

  10. [10]

    Nakamura, S

    J. Nakamura, S. Liang, G. C. Gardner, and M. J. Man- fra, Direct observation of anyonic braiding statistics, Nature Physics 16, 931 (2020)

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    Bartolomei, M

    H. Bartolomei, M. Kumar, R. Bisognin, A. Marguerite, J.-M. Berroir, E. Bocquillon, B. Pla¸ cais, A. Cavanna, Q. Dong, U. Gennser, Y. Jin, and G. F` eve, Fractional statistics in anyon collisions, Science 368, 173 (2020), https://science.sciencemag.org/content/368/6487/173.full.pdf

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Geometrical description of the frac- tional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 116801 (2011)

    work page 2011

  13. [13]

    S. M. Girvin, A. H. MacDonald, and P. M. Platzman, Collective-excitation gap in the fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 581 (1985)

    work page 1985

  14. [14]

    S. M. Girvin, A. H. MacDonald, and P. M. Platzman, Magneto-roton theory of collective excitations in the fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 33, 2481 (1986)

    work page 1986

  15. [15]

    Bijl, The lowest wave function of the symmetrical many particles system, Physica 7, 869 (1940)

    A. Bijl, The lowest wave function of the symmetrical many particles system, Physica 7, 869 (1940)

    work page 1940

  16. [16]

    R. P. Feynman, Atomic theory of liquid helium near absolute zero, Phys. Rev. 91, 1301 (1953)

    work page 1953

  17. [17]

    R. P. Feynman, Atomic theory of the two-fluid model of liquid helium, Phys. Rev. 94, 262 (1954)

    work page 1954

  18. [18]

    R. P. Feynman and M. Cohen, Energy spectrum of the excitations in liquid helium, Phys. Rev. 102, 1189 (1956)

    work page 1956

  19. [19]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Self-duality and long-wavelength 30 behavior of the Landau-level guiding-center structure function, and the shear modulus of fractional quantum Hall fluids (2011), arXiv:1112.0990 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  20. [20]

    Z. Liu, A. Gromov, and Z. Papi´ c, Geometric quench and nonequilibrium dynamics of fractional quantum Hall states, Phys. Rev. B 98, 155140 (2018)

    work page 2018

  21. [21]

    Z. Liu, A. C. Balram, Z. Papi´ c, and A. Gromov, Quench dynamics of collective modes in fractional quantum Hall bilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 076604 (2021)

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    S.-F. Liou, F. D. M. Haldane, K. Yang, and E. H. Rezayi, Chiral gravitons in fractional quantum Hall liq- uids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 146801 (2019)

    work page 2019

  23. [23]

    Gupta, Neereja Sundaresan, Thomas Alexander, Christopher J

    J. Liang, Z. Liu, Z. Yang, Y. Huang, U. Wurstbauer, C. R. Dean, K. W. West, L. N. Pfeiffer, L. Du, and A. Pinczuk, Evidence for chiral graviton modes in frac- tional quantum Hall liquids, Nature 10.1038/s41586- 024-07201-w (2024)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586- 2024

  24. [24]

    J. K. Jain, Composite-fermion approach for the frac- tional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 199 (1989)

    work page 1989

  25. [25]

    Moore and N

    G. Moore and N. Read, Nonabelions in the fractional quantum Hall effect, Nucl. Phys. B 360, 362 (1991)

    work page 1991

  26. [26]

    Read and E

    N. Read and E. Rezayi, Beyond paired quantum Hall states: Parafermions and incompressible states in the first excited Landau level, Phys. Rev. B59, 8084 (1999)

    work page 1999

  27. [27]

    J. K. Jain, Incompressible quantum Hall states, Phys. Rev. B 40, 8079 (1989)

    work page 1989

  28. [28]

    P. M. Platzman and S. He, Resonant Raman scattering from mobile electrons in the fractional quantum Hall regime, Phys. Rev. B 49, 13674 (1994)

    work page 1994

  29. [29]

    S. He, S. H. Simon, and B. I. Halperin, Response func- tion of the fractional quantized Hall state on a sphere. ii. exact diagonalization, Phys. Rev. B 50, 1823 (1994)

    work page 1994

  30. [30]

    A. C. Balram, G. J. Sreejith, and J. K. Jain, Splitting of the Girvin-MacDonald-Platzman density wave and the nature of chiral gravitons in the fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 246605 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Mujumder, S

    D. Mujumder, S. Mandal, and J. Jain, Collective exci- tations of composite fermions across multiple λ levels, Nature Physics 5, 403 (2009)

    work page 2009

  32. [32]

    I. D. Rodriguez, A. Sterdyniak, M. Hermanns, J. K. Slingerland, and N. Regnault, Quasiparticles and exci- tons for the Pfaffian quantum Hall state, Phys. Rev. B 85, 035128 (2012)

    work page 2012

  33. [33]

    Yang, Z.-X

    B. Yang, Z.-X. Hu, Z. Papi´ c, and F. D. M. Haldane, Model wave functions for the collective modes and the magnetoroton theory of the fractional quantum Hall ef- fect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 256807 (2012)

    work page 2012

  34. [34]

    Yang, Analytic wave functions for neutral bulk exci- tations in fractional quantum Hall fluids, Phys

    B. Yang, Analytic wave functions for neutral bulk exci- tations in fractional quantum Hall fluids, Phys. Rev. B 87, 245132 (2013)

    work page 2013

  35. [35]

    J. K. Jain and R. K. Kamilla, Composite fermions in the Hilbert space of the lowest electronic Landau level, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 11, 2621 (1997)

    work page 1997

  36. [36]

    J. K. Jain and R. K. Kamilla, Quantitative study of large composite-fermion systems, Phys. Rev. B 55, R4895 (1997)

    work page 1997

  37. [37]

    Pinczuk, B

    A. Pinczuk, B. S. Dennis, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. West, Observation of collective excitations in the fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3983 (1993)

    work page 1993

  38. [38]

    C. J. Mellor, R. H. Eyles, J. E. Digby, A. J. Kent, K. A. Benedict, L. J. Challis, M. Henini, C. T. Foxon, and J. J. Harris, Phonon absorption at the magnetoroton minimum in the fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2339 (1995)

    work page 1995

  39. [39]

    Pinczuk, B

    A. Pinczuk, B. Dennis, L. Pfeiffer, and K. West, Light scattering by low-energy collective excitations of quan- tum hall states, in High Magnetic Fields in the Physics of Semiconductors, edited by G. Landwehr and W. Os- sau (World Scientific Connect, 1996) pp. 83–90

    work page 1996

  40. [40]

    H. D. M. Davies, J. C. Harris, J. F. Ryan, and A. J. Turberfield, Spin and charge density excitations and the collapse of the fractional quantum Hall state atν = 1/3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4095 (1997)

    work page 1997

  41. [41]

    Zeitler, A

    U. Zeitler, A. M. Devitt, J. E. Digby, C. J. Mellor, A. J. Kent, K. A. Benedict, and T. Cheng, Ballistic heating of a two-dimensional electron system by phonon excitation of the magnetoroton minimum at ν = 1/3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 5333 (1999)

    work page 1999

  42. [42]

    M. Kang, A. Pinczuk, B. S. Dennis, M. A. Eriksson, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Inelastic light scattering by gap excitations of fractional quantum Hall states at 1/3 ≥ ν ≤ 2/3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 546 (2000)

    work page 2000

  43. [43]

    B. A. Bernevig and F. D. M. Haldane, Model fractional quantum Hall states and jack polynomials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 246802 (2008)

    work page 2008

  44. [44]

    R. K. Kamilla, X. G. Wu, and J. K. Jain, Excitons of composite fermions, Phys. Rev. B 54, 4873 (1996)

    work page 1996

  45. [45]

    R. K. Kamilla, X. G. Wu, and J. K. Jain, Compos- ite fermion theory of collective excitations in fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1332 (1996)

    work page 1996

  46. [46]

    S. Pu, A. C. Balram, J. Taylor, E. Fradkin, and Z. Papi´ c, Microscopic model for fractional quantum Hall nemat- ics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 236503 (2024)

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    V. W. Scarola, K. Park, and J. K. Jain, Rotons of com- posite fermions: Comparison between theory and exper- iment, Phys. Rev. B 61, 13064 (2000)

    work page 2000

  48. [48]

    A. C. Balram, Z. Liu, A. Gromov, and Z. Papi´ c, Very- high-energy collective states of partons in fractional quantum Hall liquids, Phys. Rev. X 12, 021008 (2022)

    work page 2022

  49. [49]

    D. X. Nguyen, F. D. M. Haldane, E. H. Rezayi, D. T. Son, and K. Yang, Multiple magnetorotons and spec- tral sum rules in fractional quantum Hall systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 246402 (2022)

    work page 2022

  50. [50]

    Yuzhu and Y

    W. Yuzhu and Y. Bo, Geometric fluctuation of confor- mal Hilbert spaces and multiple graviton modes in frac- tional quantum Hall effect, Nature Communications14, 2317 (2023)

    work page 2023

  51. [51]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Fractional quantization of the Hall effect: A hierarchy of incompressible quantum fluid states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 605 (1983)

    work page 1983

  52. [52]

    X. G. Wen and A. Zee, Shift and spin vector: New topo- logical quantum numbers for the Hall fluids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 953 (1992)

    work page 1992

  53. [53]

    S. H. Simon and B. I. Halperin, Response function of the fractional quantized Hall state on a sphere. i. fermion Chern-Simons theory, Phys. Rev. B 50, 1807 (1994)

    work page 1994

  54. [54]

    R. K. Kamilla, J. K. Jain, and S. M. Girvin, Fermi-sea- like correlations in a partially filled Landau level, Phys. Rev. B 56, 12411 (1997)

    work page 1997

  55. [55]

    A. C. Balram and J. K. Jain, Fermi wave vector for the partially spin-polarized composite-fermion Fermi sea, Phys. Rev. B 96, 235102 (2017)

    work page 2017

  56. [56]

    S. A. Trugman and S. Kivelson, Exact results for the fractional quantum Hall effect with general interactions, Phys. Rev. B 31, 5280 (1985)

    work page 1985

  57. [57]

    S. H. Simon, E. H. Rezayi, and N. R. Cooper, Pseu- dopotentials for multiparticle interactions in the quan- 31 tum Hall regime, Phys. Rev. B 75, 195306 (2007)

    work page 2007

  58. [58]

    Configuration interaction matrix elements for the quantum Hall effect

    R. Wooten and J. Macek, Configuration interaction matrix elements for the quantum Hall effect (2014), arXiv:1408.5379 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  59. [59]

    G. Fano, F. Ortolani, and E. Colombo, Configuration- interaction calculations on the fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 34, 2670 (1986)

    work page 1986

  60. [60]

    Sharma, A

    A. Sharma, A. C. Balram, and J. K. Jain, Composite- fermion pairing at half-filled and quarter-filled lowest Landau level, Phys. Rev. B 109, 035306 (2024)

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    Cappelli, C

    A. Cappelli, C. A. Trugenberger, and G. R. Zemba, Infinite symmetry in the quantum Hall effect, Nuclear Physics B 396, 465 (1993)

    work page 1993

  62. [62]

    Cappelli and L

    A. Cappelli and L. Maffi, W-infinity symmetry in the quantum Hall effect beyond the edge, Journal of High Energy Physics 2021, 120 (2021)

    work page 2021

  63. [63]

    Spodyneiko, Girvin-Macdonald-Platzman algebra, dipole symmetry, and Hohenberg-Mermin-Wagner the- orem in the lowest Landau level, Phys

    L. Spodyneiko, Girvin-Macdonald-Platzman algebra, dipole symmetry, and Hohenberg-Mermin-Wagner the- orem in the lowest Landau level, Phys. Rev. B 108, 125102 (2023)

    work page 2023

  64. [64]

    Dev and J

    G. Dev and J. K. Jain, Band structure of the fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2843 (1992)

    work page 1992

  65. [65]

    Park and J

    K. Park and J. Jain, Girvin–MacDonald–Platzman col- lective mode at general filling factors: magneto-roton minimum at half-filled Landau level, Solid State Com- munications 115, 353 (2000)

    work page 2000

  66. [66]

    A. C. Balram and S. Pu, Positions of the magnetoro- ton minima in the fractional quantum Hall effect, The European Physical Journal B 90, 124 (2017)

    work page 2017

  67. [67]

    d’Ambrumenil and A

    N. d’Ambrumenil and A. M. Reynolds, Fractional quan- tum Hall states in higher Landau levels, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 21, 119 (1988)

    work page 1988

  68. [68]

    Dev and J

    G. Dev and J. K. Jain, Jastrow-Slater trial wave func- tions for the fractional quantum Hall effect: Results for few-particle systems, Phys. Rev. B 45, 1223 (1992)

    work page 1992

  69. [69]

    X. G. Wu, G. Dev, and J. K. Jain, Mixed-spin incom- pressible states in the fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 153 (1993)

    work page 1993

  70. [70]

    J. K. Jain, Composite Fermions (Cambridge University Press, New York, US, 2007)

    work page 2007

  71. [71]

    A. C. Balram, A. W´ ojs, and J. K. Jain, State counting for excited bands of the fractional quantum Hall effect: Exclusion rules for bound excitons, Phys. Rev. B 88, 205312 (2013)

    work page 2013

  72. [72]

    Ku´ smierz and A

    B. Ku´ smierz and A. W´ ojs, Emergence of Jack ground states from two-body pseudopotentials in fractional quantum Hall systems, Phys. Rev. B 97, 245125 (2018)

    work page 2018

  73. [73]

    Yang and A

    B. Yang and A. C. Balram, Elementary excitations in fractional quantum Hall effect from classical constraints, New Journal of Physics 23, 013001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  74. [74]

    A. C. Balram, A non-abelian parton state for the ν = 2 + 3/8 fractional quantum Hall effect, SciPost Phys. 10, 83 (2021)

    work page 2021

  75. [75]

    A. C. Balram and A. W´ ojs, Fractional quantum Hall effect at ν = 2 + 4 /9, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 032035 (2020)

    work page 2020

  76. [76]

    A. C. Balram, Transitions from Abelian composite fermion to non-Abelian parton fractional quantum Hall states in the zeroth Landau level of bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 105, L121406 (2022)

    work page 2022

  77. [77]

    Yutushui and D

    M. Yutushui and D. F. Mross, Phase diagram of com- pressible and paired states in the quarter-filled Landau level, Phys. Rev. B 111, 035106 (2025)

    work page 2025

  78. [78]

    R. Morf, N. d’Ambrumenil, and B. I. Halperin, Micro- scopic wave functions for the fractional quantized Hall states at ν = 2 5and 2 7, Phys. Rev. B 34, 3037 (1986)

    work page 1986

  79. [79]

    S. M. Girvin, Anomalous quantum Hall effect and two-dimensional classical plasmas: Analytic approxima- tions for correlation functions and ground-state ener- gies, Phys. Rev. B 30, 558 (1984)

    work page 1984

  80. [80]

    T. Can, M. Laskin, and P. Wiegmann, Fractional quantum Hall effect in a curved space: Gravitational anomaly and electromagnetic response, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 046803 (2014)

    work page 2014

Showing first 80 references.