Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Resonant states reveal strong light-matter coupling in nanophotonic cavities

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Resonant states in the complex frequency plane reveal when light-matter coupling becomes strong: rather than merely perturbing each other, the states swap positions at the transition, while the paper also derives an effective Hamiltonian th

desk verdict Solid methods paper: the complex-plane trajectory criterion and overlap-integral Hamiltonian are useful, validation is decent, but the single-mode truncation and a suspicious Table I deserve referee attention. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.03468 v2 pith:E75IMW7Q submitted 2025-11-05 physics.optics

Jan David Fischbach , Sergei Gladyshev , Adrià Canós Valero , Markus Nyman , Thomas Weiss , Carsten Rockstuhl This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords resonantstatesstrongcouplingnanophotoniccavitiescomplexfrequencyplanequasinormalmodesexceptionalpointseffectiveHamiltonianoverlapintegrals
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the distinction between weak and strong light-matter coupling in open nanophotonic cavities is carried not by real-frequency spectra but by the motion of the cavity's resonant states — its complex-frequency eigenmodes. As a geometric parameter such as cavity thickness or core radius is swept, the hybridized states pass each other with only weak interaction in the weak-coupling regime, but at the onset of strong coupling they abruptly swap positions in the complex frequency plane, an unambiguous signature tied to an exceptional point. The authors then derive, from Maxwell's equations, an effective Hamiltonian for a single dominant photonic mode coupled to any number of material resonances, with coupling rates given by overlap integrals and with an additional diagonal shift of the bare photonic eigenfrequency that is absent from conventional coupled-oscillator models. They validate the approach on planar and spherical silver cavities filled with a molecular material whose permittivity was extracted from quantum-chemical simulations, showing that individual material resonances can be disentangled even when several overlap spectrally. If correct, this provides a parameter-free, fit-free route to coupling rates and a robust criterion for strong coupling without relying on ambiguous spectral features.

What carries the argument

The central object is the resonant state (quasinormal mode): an eigenmode of the source-free Maxwell equations at a complex frequency whose real part gives the resonance frequency and imaginary part the damping rate. The argument is carried by tracing these eigenfrequencies through the complex plane as a system parameter changes — weak coupling shows passing, strong coupling shows swapping via an exceptional point. The quantitative engine is the single-mode effective Hamiltonian (Eq. 10) built from a resonant-state Green's function approximation: coupling rates are overlap integrals κ_p = sqrt(g_p Ω̃_p), with g_p = ∫ E_c·iσ_p E_c dV, and the bare cavity frequency is shifted by −Σ g_p. This r

What would settle it

Take the planar cavity with the three-pole SURMOF material and solve the full nonlinear Maxwell eigenproblem at cavity thicknesses where higher-order modes create the third spectral peak; if the exact complex eigenfrequencies deviate significantly from the effective-Hamiltonian predictions (Eq. 10) in that region, the single-resonant-state assumption, and hence the coupling rates extracted from it, is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that resonant state trajectories in the complex frequency plane undergo a qualitative change exactly at the onset of strong coupling: instead of passing each other with only perturbative interactions, the two resonant states swap positions, going through an exceptional point where the square-root splitting in the coupled-oscillator discriminant vanishes. Under a single-dominant-photonic-mode assumption, the paper derives an effective Hamiltonian (Eq. 10) from the source-free Maxwell equations, in which the off-diagonal coupling between the photonic mode and the p-th material resonance is κ_p = sqrt(g_p Ω̃_p), with g_p = ∫ E_c · iσ_p E_c dV an overlap integral over th

Load-bearing premise

The central results assume both that the material permittivity can be safely analytically continued into the complex plane through its fitted Lorentz poles and, for the coupling-rate extraction, that a single bare cavity mode dominates the Green's function; if either fails, the predicted trajectories or the extracted rates lose their grounding.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The complex-plane trajectory-swap signature provides a criterion for strong coupling that does not rely on fitting peaks or dips in real-frequency spectra, avoiding ambiguities such as Fano-interference-induced splittings that mimic strong coupling.
  • The effective Hamiltonian gives direct, fit-free access to individual coupling rates κ_p from overlap integrals, allowing the contribution of each material resonance to be disentangled even when several resonances overlap and the overall splitting is a superposition.
  • The predicted diagonal shift −Σ g_p implies that hybridization renormalizes the bare photonic eigenfrequency itself — reading the cavity frequency from the uncoupled spectrum would miss this correction, which is absent in standard coupled-oscillator models.
  • The inverse eigenproblem enables the extraction of coupling rates from measured or computed complex eigenfrequencies alone, for example from pole positions of the scattering matrix, without requiring detailed field distributions.
  • Generalizing the observable-strong-coupling criterion to κ_p^eff > sqrt(γ_c^2 + γ_p^2)/√2 per material resonance provides a robust way to judge whether a specific resonance is strongly coupled even when other, weakly coupled resonances are present.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the trajectory-swap signature is generic beyond the single-mode approximation, it could serve as a model-free experimental test of strong coupling: one would directly retrieve complex eigenfrequencies from time-domain ringdown or scattering-matrix pole measurements and look for the exchange rather than fitting spectra.
  • The single-mode effective Hamiltonian excludes higher-order cavity modes, yet the paper itself identifies higher-order modes as the origin of a distinctive third spectral peak; extending the Hamiltonian to include several photonic modes would naturally add further diagonal shifts and couplings, possibly explaining the relative intensities of such multi-peak polariton spectra.
  • The per-resonance criterion κ_p^eff ≳ γ_c/√2 suggests a natural experimental check: for a given cavity, one could compare the predicted observable-strong-coupling threshold for each material resonance with the appearance of resolvable polariton branches in absorption, photoluminescence, and scattering of the same structure.
  • Because the pole trajectories depend on the analytic continuation of the fitted Lorentz permittivity into the complex plane, the accuracy of the predicted exceptional-point positions could be tested by using independently determined permittivity data in the complex frequency region, rather than only real-axis fits.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. Using resonant states (quasinormal modes) at complex frequencies, the paper argues for a criterion separating weak and strong light-matter coupling: when a geometric parameter is swept, the associated RS trajectories either pass through each other (weak coupling) or swap identities (strong coupling), with an exceptional point at the transition. Under a single-dominant-photonic-mode assumption, the authors derive from Maxwell's equations an effective Hamiltonian (Eq. (10)) coupling one cavity RS to an arbitrary number of Lorentz material poles, with overlap-integral couplings κ_p = sqrt(g_p Ω̃_p) and a diagonal shift −Σ g_p. They demonstrate the criterion on a planar Fabry-Perot cavity with one and three material poles and on a core-shell nanosphere, extract coupling rates both from overlap integrals and from an inverse eigenproblem, and compare the single-mode resonant-state expansion to a direct nonlinear eigenproblem solution (Fig. 6(a)). Code and data are provided.

Significance. If the central quantitative claims hold, the paper offers a parameter-free, first-principles route to coupling rates in open cavities, directly from normalized RS fields, and it identifies a physical correction (the diagonal shift) absent from standard coupled-oscillator models. The trajectory criterion is intuitive and is checked against direct nonlinear eigenproblem solutions; the availability of code/data and the transparent SI derivation increase confidence. The main weakness is that the quantitative extraction—overlap integrals and inverse eigenproblem—relies on a single-RS Green's function approximation whose validity is asserted rather than quantified in exactly the multi-resonance, multi-mode regime the paper targets.

major comments (3)
  1. [SI §C, Eq. (29); Eqs. (10)–(11), Fig. 6(a)] The derivation of the effective Hamiltonian and the coupling rates κ_p = sqrt(g_p Ω̃_p) assumes G_c ≈ c E_c⊗E_c/(ω−ω̃_c), i.e., a single cavity RS. This is load-bearing for the paper's main quantitative claims, but the paper itself demonstrates that higher-order cavity RSs are not negligible: they dominate the central transmission peak in Fig. 2(a4), form accumulation points at the material pole in Fig. 3(b), and produce additional polariton branches between the fundamental branches in Fig. 5(c). In such a regime the four eigenvalues used to validate the model may not be governed by the truncated 4×4 Hamiltonian, and the overlap-integral κ_p can be biased by missing modes. Please provide a quantitative error metric for the "excellent agreement" in Fig. 6(a) (e.g., maximum/mean |Δω̃| over the plotted thickness range), compare the overlap-derived κ_p with those recovered by the inverse eig
  2. [SI §D, Eqs. (41)–(45); Fig. 5(c)] The inverse-eigenproblem extraction treats the products κ̂_p κ_p and the shift K as unknowns determined by matching the characteristic polynomial of the 4×4 Hamiltonian to exactly four known RS eigenvalues. This is only valid if those four eigenvalues correspond to the single cavity RS plus the three material poles and no other RS contributes to the secular equation. Given the additional polariton branches visible in Fig. 5(c), the selection rule for the four eigenvalues is not specified, and any contamination from higher-order FP modes would bias κ_p and K. Please state how the eigenvalues are selected and include a robustness check, e.g., solving the inverse problem from subsets of eigenvalues or from noisy synthetic data.
  3. [Eq. (4) and SI §B] The three-pole Lorentz permittivity is fitted on the real frequency axis (Fig. 5(a)) and then continued analytically into the complex plane; all trajectory features—material poles, zeros, accumulation points—and the resulting strong-coupling assignments depend on the locations of those complex poles. A real-axis fit does not uniquely determine the complex-plane continuation. The direct nonlinear eigenproblem used for validation employs the same pole model, so it cannot test this assumption. Please demonstrate robustness by comparing against an independent rational approximation of the same real-axis permittivity (e.g., an AAA-based fit along the lines of Refs. [54]–[56]) or by perturbing the fitted pole parameters within their uncertainty, and state whether the strong-coupling classification changes.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 6(b) and Eq. (14)] The text states that κ_eff^p is compared at a thickness d_p where the real parts of the bare cavity mode and the p-th material resonance match, but the colored vertical lines in Fig. 6(b) are not explained in the caption. Please define d_p explicitly in the figure caption.
  2. [Table I] The table mixes geometry parameters, the SURMOF material model, and the silver model in a single column set. Separating the geometry and material-model columns would improve readability and reduce the chance of misassignment.
  3. [Eqs. (15)–(20)] The sign convention relating A_j, B_j, and σ_p is easy to confuse; a short numerical check for one Lorentz pole (e.g., the resulting ε_r at a real frequency) would help the reader verify the convention.
  4. [Figure 3 and 4 captions] The branch colors are described in the text but not in the captions. Adding a legend or explicit color labels to the figures would make the trajectory discussion much easier to follow.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: central derivation is self-contained and validated against an independent nonlinear eigenproblem.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are not circular. The trajectory-swap signature (Fig. 3) is read off resonant states obtained by solving the scattering-matrix pole problem, independently of the effective Hamiltonian. The effective Hamiltonian (Eq. 10, SI Sec. C) is derived from Maxwell's equations under an explicitly stated single-resonant-state Green's-function approximation (SI Eq. 29: G_c ≈ c E_c⊗E_c/(ω−ω̃_c)); the coupling entries κ_p = sqrt(g_p Ω̃_p) with g_p = ∫ E_c·iσ_p E_c dV are overlap integrals of two independent inputs — the bare-cavity RS and the material residues from the Lorentz/pole fit — rather than fitted to the hybrid frequencies. The resulting hybrid eigenfrequencies are benchmarked against a separately solved nonlinear eigenproblem (solid white lines vs open circles in Fig. 6), so the prediction is not the fit. The inverse eigenproblem (SI Sec. D) is an explicitly phenomenological inversion of the assumed Hamiltonian form and is not used to generate the main quantitative claims, so its assumptions do not create a circular reduction. Self-citations (e.g., Weiss & Muljarov for the pole expansion, Both & Weiss for normalization) supply standard QNM machinery with stated assumptions and are not the sole justification of the target result; no uniqueness theorem is imported. The single-mode truncation and the possible influence of higher-order cavity modes, which the paper itself identifies as the origin of the central peak in Fig. 2(a4), are validity/accuracy concerns, not circularity: they concern whether the truncation is accurate, not whether the derivation reduces to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim leans on the standard RSE machinery (already in the literature, largely from the same group lineage) plus two modeling steps done inside the paper: the fit of the molecular permittivity to Lorentz poles and the single-mode truncation. No intrinsic constants are invented and no new entities are postulated. The honest accounting is: three material fits (SURMOF 3-pole, artificial 1-pole, silver), one structural truncation (single-RS Green's function), and one adopted criterion convention (Eqs. 7–9).

free parameters (3)
  • SURMOF 3-pole Lorentz coefficients (f, ω0, Γ) = √f = 2π×(180.27, 65.52, 53.92) THz; ω0 = 2π×(412.94, 438.29, 448.79) THz; Γ = 2π×(5.3, 6.0, 6.2) THz (SI Table I)
    Fit of the homogenized TD-DFT permittivity to a 3-pole Lorentz model; these constants enter Ωp, σp and hence the overlap integrals and coupling rates. A legitimate material-modeling fit, but it is a fit with stated values.
  • Artificial single-pole medium coefficients and η scaling = √f1 = 2π×180.27 THz, ω0,1 = 2π×412.94 THz, Γ1 = 2π×5.3 THz; η ∈ {0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 1}
    Hand-chosen to place the demonstrations in weak/hidden/observable strong coupling; no physical constraint from experiment.
  • Silver Drude-Lorentz coefficients = √fAg = 2π×1867.27 THz; ω0,Ag = 2π×412.94 THz; ΓAg = 2π×10.62 THz (SI Table I)
    Literature-type input (Johnson & Christy style), but note the coincidence ω0,Ag = ω0,1, flagged in red_flags; if real, the silver host model resonates at the molecular frequency.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Macroscopic Maxwell equations with isotropic, non-magnetic, linear constitutive relations (Eqs. 1–2) govern the system.
    Starting point of the whole derivation (SI §C).
  • domain assumption The material is described by a Drude/Lorentz pole expansion ε(ω) = ε∞ + Σ iσp/(ω − Ωp) (Eq. 4), valid under analytic continuation to complex frequencies.
    Required for RS pole finding and for the effective Hamiltonian; the SURMOF permittivity is fitted to 3 Lorentz poles (SI Table I), and the artificial media are defined this way. The fit error at complex ω is not assessed.
  • domain assumption Single-mode Green's function approximation: the cavity Green's function is dominated by one RS, G ≈ c Ec⊗Ec/(ω − ω̃c) (SI Eq. 29).
    Load-bearing for the effective Hamiltonian, Eq. (10)/(39); excludes higher-order FP modes, which the paper itself shows contribute (third peak, accumulation points).
  • domain assumption RS normalization, orthogonality, and completeness results for open systems (Refs 26–28) are assumed when computing overlap integrals g_p = ∫ Ec·iσp Ec dV (Eq. 11).
    The RS field diverges away from the resonator; the specific normalization/regularization scheme is not stated in the paper.
  • domain assumption The algebraic eigenvalue problem of the truncated Hamiltonian (Eq. 10) has the same eigenvalues as the poles of the full nonlinear eigenproblem in the spectral window of interest.
    This equivalence is the content of the single-mode approximation; verified only in the two examples shown.
  • domain assumption Semi-classical Lorentz-oscillator model (Eq. 3) adequately represents the molecular excitations extracted from TD-DFT.
    The quantum-chemical data are condensed into polarizabilities/permittivity and then fit to classical oscillators (SI §A); any anharmonic or nonlocal response is neglected.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Resonant states reveal strong light-matter coupling in nanophotonic cavities." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/E75IMW7Q

@misc{pith2026251103468,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Resonant states reveal strong light-matter coupling in nanophotonic cavities},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/E75IMW7Q}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.03468}
}
read the original abstract

Photonic resonances enable control over light-matter interactions, but many key phenomena only emerge in the strong-coupling regime where light and matter excitations fully hybridize. To distinguish between weak and strong coupling, one conventionally studies real-frequency spectra of the hybrid system. However, these spectra only provide indirect estimates of the underlying resonant dynamics, as the resonances reside at complex frequencies. To overcome this contradiction, we demonstrate that photonic resonant states provide a framework for unambiguously distinguishing between weak and strong coupling. Upon tracing the resonant states through the complex plane while changing the resonator geometry, their trajectories undergo a qualitative change at the onset of strong coupling. Instead of passing each other in the complex frequency plane with only perturbative interactions, the resonant states swap positions. Assuming a single dominant photonic resonance, we derive an effective Hamiltonian that captures the interaction with multiple material resonances, including direct access to coupling rates from overlap-integrals. Our analysis reveals that, unlike most coupled-oscillator models commonly employed, hybridization not only introduces off-diagonal coupling but also shifts the bare eigenfrequency of the photonic mode. We apply our approach to planar and spherical silver resonators filled with a molecular material whose properties were extracted from quantum-chemical simulations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.03468 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Mode hybridization: (a) When a system parame [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Optical response of a planar cavity filled with a resonant medium in terms of observables commonly used as hallmarks [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Parametrized pole trajectories: The thickness of a planar cavity containing a single-pole Lorentz medium is changed, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Parametrized pole trajectories for a 3D finite system. In analogy to Figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Pole trajectories: A Fabry-Perot cavity made from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Resonant state expansion introducing material res [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Extracting the coupling coefficients from the com [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Inverse determination of light-matter coupling in disordered systems from transmittance spectra

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A misfit-minimization inversion of transmittance spectra extracts electron-photon coupling gamma and disorder strength in 1D cavity-coupled Anderson and Aubry-Andr\'e-Harper chains, with sharper results in the AAH model.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 5 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [54]

    O. P. Bruno, M. A. Santana, and L. N. Trefethen, Eval- uation of resonances: adaptivity and AAA rational ap- proximation of randomly scalarized boundary integral re- solvents (2024), arXiv:2405.19582 [math]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [56]

    F. Betz, M. Hammerschmidt, L. Zschiedrich, S. Burger, and F. Binkowski, Efficient Rational Approximation of Optical Response Functions with the AAA Algorithm , Laser & Photonics Reviews18, 2400584 (2024)

    2024

  3. [1]

    Weisbuch, M

    C. Weisbuch, M. Nishioka, A. Ishikawa, and Y. Arakawa, Observation of the coupled exciton-photon mode splitting in a semiconductor quantum microcavity, Physical Review Letters 69, 3314–3317 (1992), publisher: American Phys- ical Society

    1992

  4. [2]

    D. G. Lidzey, D. D. C. Bradley, M. S. Skolnick, T. Virgili, S. Walker, and D. M. Whittaker,Strong exciton–photon coupling in an organic semiconductor microcavity, Nature 395, 53–55 (1998), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    1998

  5. [3]

    Aberra Guebrou, C

    S. Aberra Guebrou, C. Symonds, E. Homeyer, J. C. Plenet, Y. N. Gartstein, V. M. Agranovich, and J. Bel- lessa,Coherent Emission from a Disordered Organic Semi- conductor Induced by Strong Coupling with Surface Plas- mons, Physical Review Letters108, 066401 (2012), pub- lisher: American Physical Society

    2012

  6. [4]

    L. V. Butov, A polariton laser, Nature 447, 540–541 (2007), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2007

  7. [5]

    Schneider, A.Rahimi-Iman, N.Y.Kim, J

    C. Schneider, A.Rahimi-Iman, N.Y.Kim, J. Fischer, I.G. Savenko, M. Amthor, M. Lermer, A. Wolf, L. Worschech, V. D. Kulakovskii, I. A. Shelykh, M. Kamp, S. Reitzen- stein, A.Forchel, Y.Yamamoto,andS.Höfling, An electri- cally pumped polariton laser, Nature497, 348–352 (2013), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2013

  8. [6]

    Ballarini, M

    D. Ballarini, M. De Giorgi, E. Cancellieri, R. Houdré, E. Giacobino, R. Cingolani, A. Bramati, G. Gigli, and D. Sanvitto,All-optical polariton transistor, Nature Com- munications 4, 1778 (2013), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2013

Show all 78 references
  1. [7]

    A. V. Zasedatelev, A. V. Baranikov, D. Urbonas, F. Scafir- imuto, U. Scherf, T. Stöferle, R. F. Mahrt, and P. G. Lagoudakis, A room-temperature organic polariton tran- sistor, Nature Photonics 13, 378–383 (2019), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2019

  2. [8]

    Kavokin, T

    A. Kavokin, T. C. H. Liew, C. Schneider, P. G. Lagoudakis, S. Klembt, and S. Hoefling, Polariton con- densates for classical and quantum computing, Nature Re- views Physics4, 435–451 (2022), publisher: Nature Pub- lishing Group

    2022

  3. [9]

    Mirek, A

    R. Mirek, A. Opala, P. Comaron, M. Furman, M. Król, K. Tyszka, B. Seredyński, D. Ballarini, D. Sanvitto, T. C. H. Liew, W. Pacuski, J. Suffczyński, J. Szczytko, M. Matuszewski, and B. Piętka,Neuromorphic Binarized Polariton Networks, Nano Letters21, 3715–3720 (2021), publisher...

    2021

  4. [10]

    P. A. Thomas, K. S. Menghrajani, and W. L. Barnes, All-optical control of phase singularities using strong light- matter coupling, Nature Communications13, 1809 (2022), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2022

  5. [11]

    D. G. Baranov, C. Schäfer, and M. V. Gorkunov,Toward Molecular Chiral Polaritons, ACS Photonics 10, 2440– 2455 (2023), publisher: American Chemical Society

    2023

  6. [12]

    R. Fei, M. P. Hautzinger, A. H. Rose, Y. Dong, I. I. Smalyukh, M. C. Beard, and J. van de Lagemaat,Con- trolling Exciton/Exciton Recombination in 2-D Perovskite Using Exciton–Polariton Coupling, The Journal of Phys- ical Chemistry Letters 15, 1748–1754 (2024), publisher: Ameri...

    2024

  7. [13]

    Heimig, T

    C. Heimig, T. Weber, C. Cruciano, A. Genco, T. Poss- mayer, L. Sortino, G. Valentini, C. Manzoni, S. A. Maier, M. V. Gorkunov, G. Cerullo, A. A. Antonov, and A. Tittl, Topological Control of Polaritonic Flat- bands in Anisotropic van der Waals Metasurfaces (2025), arXiv:2509.0...

    2025 arXiv

  8. [14]

    J. A. Hutchison, T. Schwartz, C. Genet, E. Devaux, and T. W. Ebbesen,Modifying Chemical Landscapes by Cou- pling to Vacuum Fields,AngewandteChemieInternational Edition 51, 1592–1596 (2012)

    2012

  9. [15]

    Hertzog, M

    M. Hertzog, M. Wang, J. Mony, and K. Börjesson,Strong light–matter interactions: a new direction within chem- istry, Chemical Society Reviews48, 937–961 (2019), pub- lisher: Royal Society of Chemistry

    2019

  10. [16]

    Savona, L

    V. Savona, L. C. Andreani, P. Schwendimann, and A. Quattropani,Quantum well excitons in semiconductor microcavities: Unified treatment of weak and strong cou- pling regimes, Solid State Communications 93, 733–739 (1995). 12

    1995

  11. [17]

    Carlson, R

    C. Carlson, R. Salzwedel, M. Selig, A. Knorr, and S. Hughes, Strong coupling regime and hybrid quasinor- mal modes from a single plasmonic resonator coupled to a transition metal dichalcogenide monolayer, Physical Re- view B104, 125424 (2021)

    2021

  12. [18]

    Zerulla, D

    B. Zerulla, D. Beutel, C. Holzer, I. Fernandez-Corbaton, C. Rockstuhl, and M. Krstić, A Multi-Scale Approach to Simulate the Nonlinear Optical Response of Molecular Nanomaterials, Advanced Materials36, 2311405 (2024)

    2024

  13. [19]

    M. F. Limonov, M. V. Rybin, A. N. Poddubny, and Y. S. Kivshar, Fano resonances in photonics, Nature Photonics 11, 543–554 (2017), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2017

  14. [20]

    Christ, S

    A. Christ, S. G. Tikhodeev, N. A. Gippius, and H. Giessen, Waveguide-plasmon polaritons: Strong cou- pling of photonic and electronic resonances in a metal- lic photonic crystal slab, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 183901–1–4 (2003)

    2003

  15. [21]

    Canales, T

    A. Canales, T. Karmstrand, D. G. Baranov, T. J. An- tosiewicz, and T. O. Shegai,Polaritonic linewidth asym- metry in the strong and ultrastrong coupling regime , Nanophotonics 12, 4073–4086 (2023)

    2023

  16. [22]

    E. A. Muljarov and W. Langbein,Resonant-state expan- sion of dispersive open optical systems: Creating gold from sand, Physical Review B 93, 075417 (2016), publisher: American Physical Society

    2016

  17. [24]

    P. E. Stamatopoulou, Strong Light–Matter Interac- tions in Extreme Plasmonic and Mie-Resonant Systems, Springer Theses (Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2024)

    2024

  18. [25]

    C. Hsu, B. Zhen, A. Stone, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljačić, Bound states in the continuum, Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16048 (2016)

    2016

  19. [26]

    Both and T

    S. Both and T. Weiss, Resonant states and their role in nanophotonics, Semiconductor Science and Technology 37, 013002 (2022)

    2022

  20. [27]

    Sauvan, T

    C. Sauvan, T. Wu, R. Zarouf, E. A. Muljarov, and P. Lalanne, Normalization, orthogonality, and complete- ness of quasinormal modes of open systems: the case of electromagnetism [Invited], Optics Express30, 6846–6885 (2022), publisher: Optica Publishing Group

    2022

  21. [28]

    P. T. Kristensen, K. Herrmann, F. Intravaia, and K. Busch, Modeling electromagnetic resonators using quasinormal modes, Advances in Optics and Photonics12, 612–708 (2020), publisher: Optica Publishing Group

    2020

  22. [29]

    Luk’yanchuk, N

    B. Luk’yanchuk, N. I. Zheludev, S. A. Maier, N. J. Ha- las, P. Nordlander, H. Giessen, and C. T. Chong, The Fano resonance in plasmonic nanostructures and meta- materials, Nature Materials9, 707–715 (2010), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2010

  23. [30]

    A. E. Miroshnichenko, S. Flach, and Y. S. Kivshar,Fano resonances in nanoscale structures, Reviews of Modern Physics82, 2257–2298 (2010), publisher: American Phys- ical Society

    2010

  24. [31]

    Sauvan, J

    C. Sauvan, J. P. Hugonin, I. S. Maksymov, and P. Lalanne,Theory of the Spontaneous Optical Emission of Nanosize Photonic and Plasmon Resonators, Physical Review Letters110, 237401 (2013), publisher: American Physical Society

    2013

  25. [32]

    Q. Bai, M. Perrin, C. Sauvan, J.-P. Hugonin, and P. Lalanne,Efficient and intuitive method for the analy- sis of light scattering by a resonant nanostructure, Optics Express 21, 27371–27382 (2013), publisher: Optica Pub- lishing Group

    2013

  26. [33]

    A. F. Koenderink, Single-Photon Nanoantennas, ACS Photonics 4, 710–722 (2017), publisher: American Chem- ical Society

    2017

  27. [34]

    Fox, Optical properties of solids, 2nd ed., Oxford master series in condensed matter physics (Oxford Univ

    M. Fox, Optical properties of solids, 2nd ed., Oxford master series in condensed matter physics (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2012)

    2012

  28. [35]

    Hecht,Optics (Pearson Education India, 2012)

    E. Hecht,Optics (Pearson Education India, 2012)

    2012

  29. [36]

    Ben Soltane, F

    I. Ben Soltane, F. Dierick, B. Stout, and N. Bonod,Gen- eralized Drude–Lorentz Model Complying with the Singu- larity Expansion Method, Advanced Optical Materials12, 2400093 (2024)

    2024

  30. [37]

    Zheng, S

    D. Zheng, S. Zhang, Q. Deng, M. Kang, P. Nordlander, and H. Xu,Manipulating Coherent Plasmon–Exciton In- teraction in a Single Silver Nanorod on Monolayer WSe2, Nano Letters17, 3809–3814 (2017), publisher: American Chemical Society

    2017

  31. [38]

    J. Wen, H. Wang, W. Wang, Z. Deng, C. Zhuang, Y. Zhang, F. Liu, J. She, J. Chen, H. Chen, S. Deng, and N. Xu,Room-Temperature Strong Light–Matter Inter- action with Active Control in Single Plasmonic Nanorod Coupled with Two-Dimensional Atomic Crystals, Nano Letters17, 4689–46...

    2017

  32. [39]

    M. S. Rider and W. L. Barnes,Something from nothing: linking molecules with virtual light, Contemporary Physics 62, 217–232 (2021), publisher: Taylor & Francis

    2021

  33. [40]

    Törmä and W

    P. Törmä and W. L. Barnes,Strong coupling between sur- face plasmon polaritons and emitters: a review, Reports on Progress in Physics78, 013901 (2014), publisher: IOP Publishing

    2014

  34. [41]

    Lalanne, W

    P. Lalanne, W. Yan, K. Vynck, C. Sauvan, and J.-P. Hugonin, Light Interaction with Photonic and Plasmonic Resonances, Laser & Photonics Reviews 12, 1700113 (2018)

    2018

  35. [42]

    M. S. Rider, E. C. Johnson, D. Bates, W. P. Wardley, R. H. Gordon, R. D. J. Oliver, S. P. Armes, G. J. Leggett, andW.L.Barnes,Strongcouplinginmolecularsystems: a simple predictor employing routine optical measurements (2024), arXiv:2402.09885 [physics]

    2024 arXiv

  36. [43]

    Novotny and B

    L. Novotny and B. Hecht,Principles of Nano-Optics, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012)

    2012

  37. [44]

    W. L. Barnes, Strong coupling and the C=O vibrational bond (2023), arXiv:2307.02922 [physics]

    2023 arXiv

  38. [45]

    K. S. Menghrajani, A. B. Vasista, W. J. Tan, P. A. Thomas, F. Herrera, and W. L. Barnes,Molecular Strong Coupling and Cavity Finesse , The Journal of Physi- cal Chemistry Letters 15, 7449–7457 (2024), publisher: American Chemical Society

    2024

  39. [46]

    Schneider, M

    C. Schneider, M. M. Glazov, T. Korn, S. Höfling, and B. Urbaszek,Two-dimensional semiconductors in the regime of strong light-matter coupling, Nature Communi- cations 9, 2695 (2018)

    2018

  40. [47]

    Symonds, C

    C. Symonds, C. Bonnand, J. C. Plenet, A. Bréhier, R. Parashkov, J. S. Lauret, E. Deleporte, and J. Bel- lessa, Particularities of surface plasmon–exciton strong coupling with large Rabi splitting, New Journal of Physics 10, 065017 (2008)

    2008

  41. [48]

    Ghosh and T

    S. Ghosh and T. C. H. Liew,Quantum computing with exciton-polariton condensates, npj Quantum Information 6, 1–6 (2020), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2020

  42. [49]

    J. G. Robertson,Quantifying Resolving Power in Astro- 13 nomical Spectra, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia30, e048 (2013)

    2013

  43. [50]

    H. G. Schulze, S. Rangan, M. Z. Vardaki, M. W. Blades, R. F. B. Turner, and J. M. Piret,Critical Evaluation of Spectral Resolution Enhancement Methods for Raman Hy- perspectra, Applied Spectroscopy76, 61–80 (2022)

    2022

  44. [51]

    Hagiwara and T

    Y. Hagiwara and T. Kuwatani, Precision in peak pa- rameter estimation for Gaussian and Lorentzian profiles: Guidelines for instrument optimization (2025)

    2025

  45. [52]

    Berkhout and A

    A. Berkhout and A. F. Koenderink, A simple transfer-matrix model for metasurface multilayer sys- tems, Nanophotonics9, 3985–4007 (2020), publisher: De Gruyter

    2020

  46. [53]

    J. Cao, S. De Liberato, and A. V. Kavokin, Strong light–matter coupling in microcavities characterised by Rabi-splittings comparable to the Bragg stop-band widths, New Journal of Physics23, 113015 (2021), publisher: IOP Publishing

    2021

  47. [55]

    Nakatsukasa, O

    Y. Nakatsukasa, O. Sète, and L. N. Trefethen,The AAA Algorithm for Rational Approximation, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing40, A1494–A1522 (2018), publisher: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics

    2018

  48. [57]

    J. D. Fischbach, F. Betz, N. Asadova, P. Tassan, D. Ur- bonas, T. Stöferle, R. F. Mahrt, S. Burger, C. Rockstuhl, F. Binkowski, and T. J. Sturges,A Framework to Compute Resonances Arising from Multiple Scattering, Advanced Theory and Simulations8, 2400989 (2025)

    2025

  49. [58]

    Canós Valero, V

    A. Canós Valero, V. Bobrovs, T. Weiss, L. Gao, A. S. Shalin, and Y. Kivshar,Bianisotropic exceptional points in an isolated dielectric nanoparticle, Physical Review Re- search6, 013053 (2024), publisher: American Physical So- ciety

    2024

  50. [59]

    T. J. Antosiewicz, S. P. Apell, and T. Shegai, Plas- mon–Exciton Interactions in a Core–Shell Geometry: From Enhanced Absorption to Strong Coupling, ACS Pho- tonics 1, 454–463 (2014), publisher: American Chemical Society

    2014

  51. [60]

    Stete, W

    F. Stete, W. Koopman, C. Henkel, O. Benson, G. Kewes, and M. Bargheer, Optical Spectra of Plasmon–Exciton Core–Shell Nanoparticles: A Heuristic Quantum Ap- proach, ACS Photonics10, 2511–2520 (2023), publisher: American Chemical Society (ACS)

    2023

  52. [61]

    A. D. Kondorskiy, Optical Spectra of Plasmon-Exciton Core-Shell Nanoparticles: An Anisotropic Classical Model Eliminates Discrepancies with Experiments (2024), arXiv:2404.01718 [physics]

    2024 arXiv

  53. [62]

    Greten, R

    L. Greten, R. Salzwedel, T. Göde, D. Greten, S. Reich, S. Hughes, M. Selig, and A. Knorr, Strong Coupling of Two-Dimensional Excitons and Plasmonic Photonic Crys- tals: Microscopic Theory Reveals Triplet Spectra, ACS Photonics 11, 1396–1411 (2024), publisher: American Chemical Society

    2024

  54. [63]

    Tserkezis, P

    C. Tserkezis, P. A. D. Gonçalves, C. Wolff, F. Todisco, K. Busch, and N. A. Mortensen, Mie excitons: Under- standing strong coupling in dielectric nanoparticles, Phys- ical Review B 98, 155439 (2018), publisher: American Physical Society

    2018

  55. [64]

    W.-J. Beyn, An integral method for solving nonlinear eigenvalue problems, Linear Algebra and its Applications Special Issue dedicated to Heinrich Voss’s 65th birthday, 436, 3839–3863 (2012)

    2012

  56. [65]

    D. A. Bykov and L. L. Doskolovich,Numerical Methods for Calculating Poles of the Scattering Matrix With Appli- cations in Grating Theory, Journal of Lightwave Technol- ogy 31, 793–801 (2013)

    2013

  57. [66]

    L. J. Armitage, M. B. Doost, W. Langbein, and E. A. Muljarov, Resonant-state expansion applied to planar waveguides, Phys. Rev. A89, 053832 (2014)

    2014

  58. [67]

    M. B. Doost, W. Langbein, and E. A. Muljarov, Resonant-state expansion applied to three-dimensional open optical systems, Phys. Rev. A90, 013834 (2014)

    2014

  59. [68]

    Defrance and T

    J. Defrance and T. Weiss,On the pole expansion of elec- tromagnetic fields, Opt. Express28, 32363–32376 (2020)

    2020

  60. [69]

    Weiss, M

    T. Weiss, M. Mesch, M. Schäferling, H. Giessen, W. Langbein, and E. A. Muljarov,From dark to bright: First-order perturbation theory with analytical mode nor- malization for plasmonic nanoantenna arrays applied to refractive index sensing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 237401 (2016). ...

    2016

  61. [70]

    between two thin silver layers, forming the top and bottom reflectors. While the optical properties of sil- ver are readily available in the literature [3], the authors of [2] developed a multi-scale framework to obtain optical properties from quantum-chemical time-dependent d...

  62. [71]

    Pole: Oscillator Strength√ f1 = 2 π × 180 .266 33 THz Resonance ω 0,1 = 2 π × 412 .937 27 THz Damping Γ 1 = 2 π × 5.3 THz Lorentz model: Oscillator Strength (or Plasma Frequency)p fAg = 2 π × 1867 .2715 THz Damping Γ = 2 π × 10 .618 653 THz Resonance ω 0,Ag = 2 π × 412 .937 27...

  63. [72]

    Pole:√ f2 = 2 π × 65 .517 166 THz ω 0,2 = 2 π × 438 .293 07 THz Γ 2 = 2 π × 6.0 THz

  64. [73]

    effective Hamiltonian

    Pole:√ f3 = 2 π × 53 .923 443 THz ω 0,3 = 2 π × 448 .791 10 THz Γ 3 = 2 π × 6.2 THz Table I. Geometry and material models of the treated examples. introduced in the cavity. Upon filling the cavity with the material, the permittivity is modified by a series of P additional mate...

  65. [74]

    Haldar, Z

    R. Haldar, Z. Fu, R. Joseph, D. Herrero, L. Martín- Gomis, B. S. Richards, I. A. Howard, A. Sastre-Santos, and C. Wöll, Guest-responsive polaritons in a porous framework: chromophoric sponges in optical QED cavi- ties, Chemical Science 11, 7972–7978 (2020), publisher: The Roya...

    2020

  66. [75]

    Zerulla, M

    B. Zerulla, M. Krstić, D. Beutel, C. Holzer, C. Wöll, C. Rockstuhl, and I. Fernandez-Corbaton,A Multi-Scale Approach for Modeling the Optical Response of Molec- ular Materials Inside Cavities, Advanced Materials 34, 2200350 (2022)

    2022

  67. [76]

    P. B. Johnson and R. W. Christy,Optical Constants of the Noble Metals, Physical Review B6, 4370–4379 (1972), publisher: American Physical Society

    1972

  68. [77]

    Sehmi, W

    H. Sehmi, W. Langbein, and E. Muljarov,Applying the resonant-state expansion to realistic materials with fre- quency dispersion, Physical Review B101, 045304 (2020), publisher: American Physical Society

    2020

  69. [78]

    Weiss and E

    T. Weiss and E. A. Muljarov,How to calculate the pole ex- pansion of the optical scattering matrix from the resonant states, Physical Review B98, 085433 (2018), publisher: American Physical Society

    2018

  70. [79]

    J. D. Fischbach, S. Gladyshev, A. Canós Valero, M. Ny- man, T. Weiss, and C. Rockstuhl, Source Code and Simu- lation Results: Resonant states reveal strong light-matter coupling in nanophotonic cavities - www.github.com/tfp- photonics/agsurmof (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.