Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Wikidata Vandalism Detection - The Loganberry Vandalism Detector at WSDM Cup 2017

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1712.06922 v1 pith:E7DB32BZ submitted 2017-12-19 cs.IR

classification cs.IR
keywords vandalismdetectionobtainedroc-aucscorewikidatawsdmanyone
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Wikidata is the new, large-scale knowledge base of the Wikimedia Foundation. As it can be edited by anyone, entries frequently get vandalized, leading to the possibility that it might spread of falsified information if such posts are not detected. The WSDM 2017 Wiki Vandalism Detection Challenge requires us to solve this problem by computing a vandalism score denoting the likelihood that a revision corresponds to an act of vandalism and performance is measured using the ROC-AUC obtained on a held-out test set. This paper provides the details of our submission that obtained an ROC-AUC score of 0.91976 in the final evaluation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Graph-Linguistic Fusion: Using Language Models for Wikidata Vandalism Detection

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A single multilingual language model serializes all Wikidata edits into text and outperforms the production ORES system in vandalism detection and fairness.

  2. Wikidata from a Research Perspective -- A Systematic Mapping Study of Wikidata

    cs.DL 2019-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A systematic mapping study classifies 67 peer-reviewed Wikidata research papers into five topic areas and identifies gaps such as multilingualism and usability.

Pith tools