Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Confidence Intervals for Prevalence Estimates from Complex Surveys with Imperfect Assays

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.13494 v1 pith:EBBBNBZD submitted 2022-05-26 stat.ME

classification stat.ME
keywords methodsconfidenceimperfectintervalssamplingsettingssurveytests
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present several related methods for creating confidence intervals to assess disease prevalence in variety of survey sampling settings. These include simple random samples with imperfect tests, weighted sampling with perfect tests, and weighted sampling with imperfect tests, with the first two settings considered special cases of the third. Our methods use survey results and measurements of test sensitivity and specificity to construct melded confidence intervals. We demonstrate that our methods appear to guarantee coverage in simulated settings, while competing methods are shown to achieve much lower than nominal coverage. We apply our method to a seroprevalence survey of SARS-CoV-2 in undiagnosed adults in the United States between May and July 2020.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools