On the Compound Beta-Binomial Risk Model with Delayed Claims and Randomized Dividends

Aparna B. S; Neelesh S Upadhye

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 19 references

On the Compound Beta-Binomial Risk Model with Delayed Claims and Randomized Dividends

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper derives explicit recursive expressions for the Gerber-Shiu function in a compound binomial insurance risk model where claim, by-claim, and dividend probabilities are Beta-random, with the zero-threshold case fixed by equation…

desk verdict A competent re-derivation of known recursions with constants replaced by means, but the random-probability layer does no work and the sampling scheme is never specified. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03407 v1 pith:EF2WIIXY submitted 2019-08-09 q-fin.ST

Aparna B. S , Neelesh S Upadhye This is my paper · ORCID

classification q-fin.ST MSC 91B3060J10

keywords Gerber-ShiufunctioncompoundbinomialriskmodelBeta-Binomialdelayedclaimsrandomizeddividendsruinprobabilitydiscrete-timesurplusprocess

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that in a discrete-time insurance risk process where the probability of a main claim, the probability of a by-claim, and the probability of a dividend payment are random with Beta distributions, the Gerber-Shiu function--the expected discounted penalty at ruin--can be computed by an explicit recursion. The recursion is equation (15) for the zero-dividend-threshold case and equation (18) for a positive threshold $d>0$, with the boundary value $m(0)$ fixed through a unique root $z_0$ of an auxiliary generating function. If the derivation is right, ruin probabilities, deficit and surplus probabilities, and related ruin quantities for this Compound Beta-Binomial model are all available recursively once the claim-size distributions and the means of the Beta probabilities are given. This generalizes the fixed-probability compound binomial model with delayed claims and randomized dividends to randomly varying occurrence probabilities.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by a first-step analysis of the surplus process over the initial time period, splitting the possible outcomes according to whether a main claim occurs, whether the triggered by-claim occurs in the same period, and whether a dividend is paid, and writing each case as a convolution of the claim-size distributions with the unknown future Gerber-Shiu function. Passing to generating functions produces the auxiliary functions $\Gamma_1(z)$ and $\Gamma_2(z)$; the positive-security-loading condition makes $\Gamma_2$ strictly increasing on $(0,1)$, so its unique zero $z_0$ supplies the missing initial value $m(0)$. Comparing coefficients in the generating-function identity then turns the equation into the explicit recursion for $m(u+1)$ in terms of earlier values and known penalty expectations.

What would settle it

Fix the common-draw interpretation, choose specific Beta parameters and claim-size distributions, and compute the ruin-related Gerber-Shiu value for a small surplus such as $u=1$ exactly by conditioning on the single common Beta draw; if that value differs from the output of recursion (15) for any parameter choice, the recursion is not the solution to the common-draw model as written.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's first main result is that the Gerber-Shiu function $m(u)$ satisfies the recursive relation (15) when the dividend threshold is zero, with the initial value $m(0)$ determined by equation (14) from the unique root $z_0$ of the generating function $\Gamma_2(z)$ in $(0,1)$. For a positive dividend threshold $d>0$, the same kind of recursion, equation (18), holds for $u\ge d$ once the boundary values $m_d(0),\dots,m_d(d)$ are obtained from a system of $2d$ equations and the discounted joint distribution of the surplus before ruin and the deficit at ruin. The penalty function can be specialized to recover recursive formulas for the probability of ruin, the deficit-at-ruin probabilities, the generating function of the deficit, the surplus-at-ruin probabilities, and the probability of the claim causing ruin. The model is presented as a generalization of the constant-probability compound binomial risk model, to which the recursions reduce when the Beta random probabilities are replaced by fixed probabilities equal to their means.

Load-bearing premise

The recursions require that the random Beta probabilities can be replaced by their fixed means in every future transition, which is justified only if the probabilities are redrawn independently in each time period; if one common Beta draw governs all periods, observing a claim updates the posterior and the future Gerber-Shiu value is history-dependent, so the derivation does not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The recursion can be evaluated step by step for any initial surplus once $m(0)$ and the claim-size probability mass functions are specified, so the Gerber-Shiu function is computationally accessible without simulating the process.
Choosing the penalty function as a constant gives a recursion for the probability of ruin; other choices give the deficit distribution, its generating function, the surplus-at-ruin distribution, and the distribution of the claim causing ruin.
Setting the Beta probabilities to fixed constants reproduces the earlier compound binomial delayed-claims results, which acts as a consistency check on the new recursions.
For $d>0$, the dividend-threshold case is solved by first determining the boundary values from a finite linear system and the discounted joint law of pre-ruin surplus and deficit, then applying the same recursion above the threshold.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial inference: because only the means $\mathbb{E}[K]$, $\mathbb{E}[W]$, and $\mathbb{E}[V]$ enter the recursions, any two Beta specifications with the same means give identical ruin quantities under this derivation; if the intended model was a single common Beta draw shared by all periods, that collapse to the mean is not a property of the model but an artifact of the derivation.
Editorial inference: the same first-step generating-function procedure should work for any random probability on $[0,1]$, not only Beta distributions, since the equations depend on the distributions only through their means.
Editorial inference: the unresolved sampling scheme for the Beta probabilities is testable numerically; comparing equation (15) with exact enumeration or simulation under the common-draw interpretation would settle whether the recursion is the solution to that model.
Editorial inference: the paper stops at recursive formulas and does not discuss statistical use; the same expressions could be embedded in a likelihood or Bayesian estimation routine for the Beta parameters from observed claim histories.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The short version: this paper re-derives the Gerber-Shiu recursions from [11] and [18] with fixed probabilities replaced by means of Beta-distributed random probabilities, and the one thing that would make it a genuinely new model—the randomness itself—does no work. The central claim does not survive a close read.

What the paper does well: the derivations are systematic. The authors carefully walk through the first-step analysis for d = 0 and d > 0, handle delayed by-claims via an auxiliary surplus process, and are explicit that fixed probabilities reproduce [11] and [18]. As an exercise in relabeling constants, the algebra is coherent, and the citation pattern looks honest.

The soft spot is load-bearing. Assumptions (A1)–(A3) only say the probabilities have Beta distributions and that P(K=1) = E(K), E(W), E(V). The recursion in equation (6) treats those expectations as constants in every future transition, writing the continuation as m(u−k) and m(u+1−k). That is legitimate only if the Bernoulli parameters are redrawn independently each period, in which case the process is exactly the fixed-probability compound binomial model with those means, and the Beta layer adds nothing. If instead the parameters are drawn once and shared across time—which the name "Beta-Binomial" and the Binomial(n, Λ1) statement suggest—then observing claims updates the posterior, the future ruin probability is history-dependent, and the continuation terms are not m(u−k). The paper never says which scheme is meant. Either way, the claimed Compound Beta-Binomial Risk Model is either a relabeling of existing results or an invalid first-step analysis.

There is also no numerical validation, no worked example with actual Beta parameters, and no comparison to fixed-probability results, so the recursive formulas are left purely formal. That would be acceptable for a purely analytic paper, but it makes it harder to see what the claimed generalization buys.

Who is this for? Someone who wants to see the fixed-probability recursions written out carefully might find the organization useful, but the paper overstates its contribution. I would not bring it to a reading group and would not cite it as a new model. For peer review: I would desk reject. The core ambiguity is fundamental and the novelty is essentially nil; a referee would either report the collapse to the fixed-probability case or the missing posterior update.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a discrete-time compound binomial risk model in which the probabilities of a main claim, a by-claim, and a dividend payment are random, each following a Beta distribution. It derives recursive expressions for the Gerber-Shiu discounted penalty function in two settings: a zero dividend threshold (d = 0) and a positive threshold (d > 0). The initial value m(0) is obtained from a root of a generating-function equation, and the resulting recursions are applied to several ruin-related quantities: the probability of ruin, the deficit at ruin, the generating function of the deficit, the surplus before ruin, and the claim causing ruin. The paper claims these results generalize earlier fixed-probability compound binomial models with delayed claims and randomized dividends, specifically those of Wat et al. [11] and Yuen et al. [18].

Significance. If the derivation were valid for a genuinely Beta-distributed claim-probability model, the paper would extend a standard discrete-time risk model to a random-coefficient setting and provide computable recursions for ruin quantities. The manuscript has some strengths: it carefully sets up a delayed-by-claim structure, uses generating-function techniques to derive recursions, and explicitly handles both zero and positive dividend thresholds. However, the central novelty is not realized. The random probabilities are integrated out to their means before any recursion is written, so no feature of the Beta distribution other than its mean appears in any formula. Consequently, the model either collapses to the fixed-probability compound binomial model with p = E(Λ) (if probabilities are redrawn each period) or the derivation is invalid (if a single common random probability is drawn, because the recursions ignore posterior updating). The paper also contains no numerical examples or simulations that might demonstrate the behavior of the new recursions. The algebraic re-derivation of [11] and [18] is coherent, but it does not support the claimed contribution.

major comments (3)

[Section 2, Assumptions (A1)-(A3) and Eq. (6)] The derivation of the first-step recursion (6) replaces the Beta-distributed probabilities Λ1, Λ2, Λ3 by their unconditional means E(K), E(W), E(V) in every future transition, as seen in the terms m(u−k), m(u+1−k), and maux used throughout. This is legitimate only if the probabilities are redrawn independently in each time period; the paper never states this sampling scheme. The name 'Beta-Binomial' and the statement in the Introduction that N_n follows Binomial(n, Λ1) strongly suggest the alternative common-draw interpretation, under which observing a claim in an early period updates the posterior distribution of the common Λ1. Under that interpretation, the continuation term should be a Gerber-Shiu function evaluated with updated Beta parameters, not m(u−k), so Eq. (6) and hence the main recursions (15) and (18) do not follow. Under the independent-redraw interpretation, the process is exactly the fixed-probability compound binomial model with claim probability E(K), by-claim probability E(W), and dividend probability E(V), so the claimed generalization is vacuous. The manuscript must specify the sampling scheme and reconcile the derivation with it.
[Section 2, Eqs. (14), (15), (18)] The Beta distribution is integrated out before any recursion is written: all formulas depend only on E(K), E(W), and E(V). No variance, posterior update, or higher moment of the Beta distributions appears anywhere in the derived expressions. Thus the random-probability feature does no work in the derivation; the recursions coincide, by construction, with the constant-probability recursions of [11] and [18] under the substitution p = E(K), etc. The paper's own concluding remark that fixed probabilities reproduce [11] and [18] confirms this reduction. The claim of a genuinely new model with random claim probabilities is therefore unsupported.
[Section 2.1, Eqs. (22)-(24)] In the d > 0 case, the initial values for md(u) are obtained by combining equations (22), (23), and (24), where (24) uses the joint distribution µ(v1, v2) derived for the no-dividend process starting at surplus 0. The derivation of this boundary condition is only sketched, and it is not explained why the no-dividend ruin distribution from starting surplus 0 can be used to reconstruct the threshold-d process. In a threshold dividend model, a surplus path starting at d can hit the barrier and pay dividends before ruin, so the simple first-passage decomposition in (24) requires a careful argument with the strong Markov property and an explicit account of the dividend payments. Without this argument, the d > 0 recursions (16)-(18) are not fully established even under the fixed-probability interpretation.

minor comments (4)

[Keywords and Abstract] There are multiple typos: 'fu nciton' in the keywords, 'reﬀered' in the Introduction, and 'discount factor d > 0' in Section 2.1 (should be 'dividend threshold d > 0'). The paper would benefit from a careful proofreading pass.
[Section 2, Tables 1 and 2] The two tables have garbled formatting: the column header 'Case of no ruin. Case of no ruin' is duplicated, and the rows are difficult to parse. The tables are central to the first-step analysis, so they should be reformatted with clear separation between the no-ruin and ruin cases.
[Section 2, Eq. (15)] Equation (15) is extremely long and contains several apparent bracket mismatches and line-break artifacts (e.g., unclosed parentheses in the terms involving E[Θ_K(X+WY)+Yhat]). The equation should be re-typeset and checked for matching delimiters, since readers are expected to verify or implement the recursion.
[Section 3, Examples 3.3 and 3.4] The expressions for E[Θ...] contain apparent typographical errors: in Example 3.3, 'P(X + WY = z0 + k)' should presumably be 'P(X + WY = u + k)' in the definition of E[Θ_{X+WY}(z0)]; in Example 3.4, 'E[Θ_{X+WY}(u)] = ν I{u=y} F(u)' mixes the discount factor into an indicator that should depend only on the surplus, and 'I{z0 = y}' should likely be 'I{u = y}'. These inconsistencies obscure the intended substitutions.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 8.0 of 10

The Beta-distributed claim probabilities are collapsed to their unconditional means before the first-step recursion is written, so the central Gerber-Shiu recursion reduces to the fixed-probability recursions of [11] and [18] by construction.

renaming known result [Section 2, Assumptions (A1)-(A3), Eq. (6); Section 4, Conclusion]
"Let Ki be Bernoulli(Λ1) r.v’s that represent the occurrence of a main claim at time i, where Λ1 has Beta distribution with parameters (a1, b1). Hence P (K = 1) = E(K)."

This assumption is the only place the Beta law enters the derivation. Equation (6) and all later generating-function steps leading to (15) use only E(K), E(W), and E(V) for every future transition; no posterior E[Λ | past], no variance, and no higher Beta moment ever appears. If Λ is redrawn each period, the marginal process is exactly the iid fixed-probability compound binomial model with claim probabilities E(Λ1), E(Λ2), E(Λ3); if Λ is drawn once, the continuation terms should be history-dependent posterior means, which the recursion does not include. Either way, the random Beta ingredient is definitionally inert, and the claimed 'Beta-Binomial' recursion is the known constant-probability recursion with the constants relabelled as Beta means.
renaming known result [Section 2, Eqs. (7)-(15); Section 4, Conclusion]
"If the probabilities are fixed, then the results in [11] and [18] can be reproduced."

The paper's own conclusion confirms the reduction: with E(K), E(W), E(V) in place of constant p_K, p_W, p_V, equations (6)-(15) are algebraically the same first-step-analysis recursions as in [11] and [18]. The Beta parameters a_i, b_i enter only through the ratio a_i/(a_i+b_i). Presenting this as a new random-probability model therefore renames the existing fixed-probability result rather than deriving a genuinely new one from the Beta distribution, so the central claimed generalization is equivalent, by the paper's own equations, to its fixed-probability input.

full rationale

The Gerber-Shiu recursion itself is not circular in the narrow sense that m(u+1) is solved in terms of earlier values: first-step analysis legitimately produces such recursions. The circularity is in the paper's central contribution, the random-probability generalization. Assumptions (A1)-(A3) immediately replace Bernoulli(Λ) by P(K=1)=E(K), and every subsequent displayed equation depends only on those means. Thus the derivation never uses the fact that Λ is Beta beyond its first moment; the resulting formulas coincide with the fixed-probability recursions of Wat et al. [11] and Yuen et al. [18] with parameters E(K), E(W), E(V). The paper itself says that fixing the probabilities reproduces [11] and [18], which is direct evidence that the new model is the old model with relabelled constants. There is no self-citation chain involved, so the issue is not pattern 3 or 4; it is an internal reduction by construction. Because the central claim, not just a side remark, collapses to the known constant-probability result, a score of 8 is appropriate: the result is forced by the definitions, although the algebraic derivation of the recursion and the root-finding for m(0) are internally coherent.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model relies on two substantive assumptions that are not justified by the Beta-Binomial framework: (i) the reduction of each random probability to its mean inside the recursions, and (ii) the Markov property of the surplus process. The first makes the intended randomness inert; the second fails if the random probabilities are common across time. These two assumptions together are the load-bearing and fragile part of the paper.

assumptions (3)

ad hoc to paper The entire effect of the Beta-distributed probabilities Λ1, Λ2, Λ3 on the Gerber-Shiu function is captured by their means E(K), E(W), E(V).
Assumptions (A1)-(A3) introduce Beta distributions, but equations (6)-(9) and all subsequent recursions contain only E(K), E(W), E(V). No variance, covariance, or posterior term appears, so the Beta distribution is effectively reduced to a point mass at its mean.
domain assumption The discrete-time surplus process is Markovian in the surplus level alone, so the Gerber-Shiu function after the first period is m(u-k) independent of the first-period claim outcomes.
This is required for the first-step analysis leading to (6)-(9). It holds for fixed probabilities but not if the Beta parameters are shared across time, since observed claims update the posterior distribution of the parameters.
standard math Generating functions \tilde f and \tilde g converge and are differentiable on the interval [z0,1] where z0 is the unique root of Γ2.
The derivation of (13) and the proof of the unique root z0 in (0,1) assumes power series manipulations and differentiation under the sum are valid. This is standard but not stated.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the Compound Beta-Binomial Risk Model with Delayed Claims and Randomized Dividends." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EF2WIIXY

@misc{pith2026190803407,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the Compound Beta-Binomial Risk Model with Delayed Claims and Randomized Dividends},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EF2WIIXY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03407}
}

abstract

In this paper, we propose the discrete time Compound Beta-Binomial Risk Model with by-claims, delayed by-claims and randomized dividends. We then analyze the Gerber-Shiu function for the cases where the dividend threshold $d=0$ and $d>0$ under the assumption that the constant discount rate $\nu \in (0,1)$. More specifically, we study the discrete time compound binomial risk model subject to the assumption that the probabilities with which the claims, by-claims occur and the dividends are issued are not fixed(constant), instead the probabilities are random and follow a Beta distribution with parameters $a_{i}$ and $b_{i}$, $i = 1, 2, 3$. Recursive expressions for the Gerber-Shiu function corresponding to the proposed model are obtained. The recursive relations are further utilized to obtain significant ruin related quantities of interest. Recursive relations for probability of ruin, the probability of the deficit at ruin, the generating function of the deficit at ruin and the probability of surplus at ruin and for the probability of the claim causing ruin are obtained.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

19 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages

[11]

On the compound binomial risk model with delayed claims and randomized dividends

Kam Pui Wat, Kam Chuen Yuen, Wai Keung Li, and Xueyuan Wu. On the compound binomial risk model with delayed claims and randomized dividends. Risks, 6(1):6, 2018

work page 2018
[18]

On a discrete-time risk m odel with delayed claims and dividends

Kam Chuen Yuen, Jinzhu Li, and Rong Wu. On a discrete-time risk m odel with delayed claims and dividends. Risk and Decision Analysis , 4(1):3–16, 2013

work page 2013
[1]

The gerber–shiu discounted p enalty function in the delayed renewal risk process with random income

Zhen-hua Bao and Zhong-xing Ye. The gerber–shiu discounted p enalty function in the delayed renewal risk process with random income. Applied Mathematics and Computation , 184(2):857–863, 2007

work page 2007
[2]

A note on the net proﬁt condition for discrete and classical risk models

Julius Damarackas and Jonas ˇSiaulys. A note on the net proﬁt condition for discrete and classical risk models. Lithuanian Mathematical Journal , 55(4):465–473, 2015

work page 2015
[3]

A risk model with delayed claims

Angelos Dassios and Hongbiao Zhao. A risk model with delayed claims . Journal of Applied Probability , 50(3):686–702, 2013

work page 2013
[4]

S ome stable algorithms in ruin theory and their applications

David CM Dickson, Alfredo D Egidio dos Reis, and Howard R Waters. S ome stable algorithms in ruin theory and their applications. ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , 25(2):153–175, 1995

work page 1995
[5]

Complete monotonicity of the probab ility of ruin and de ﬁnettis dividend problem

Hua Dong and Chuancun Yin. Complete monotonicity of the probab ility of ruin and de ﬁnettis dividend problem. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity , 25(1):178–185, 2012

work page 2012
[6]

On distributions of runs in the compound binomial risk model

Serkan Eryilmaz. On distributions of runs in the compound binomial risk model. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability , 16(1):149–159, 2014. 13

work page 2014

Show all 19 references

[7]

Mathematical fun with the compound binomial pro cess

Hans U Gerber. Mathematical fun with the compound binomial pro cess. ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , 18(2):161–168, 1988

1988
[8]

On the time value of ruin

Hans U Gerber and Elias SW Shiu. On the time value of ruin. North American Actuarial Journal , 2(1):48–72, 1998

1998
[9]

On a discrete risk model with delayed cla ims and a randomized dividend strategy

Chaolin Liu and Zhimin Zhang. On a discrete risk model with delayed cla ims and a randomized dividend strategy. Advances in Diﬀerence Equations , 2015(1):284, 2015

2015
[10]

The compound binomial model with randomized decisions on paying dividends

Jiyang Tan and Xiangqun Yang. The compound binomial model with randomized decisions on paying dividends. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics , 39(1):1–18, 2006

2006
[12]

The gerber–shiu discounte d penalty function in the stationary renewal risk model

Gordon E Willmot and David CM Dickson. The gerber–shiu discounte d penalty function in the stationary renewal risk model. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics , 32(3):403–411, 2003

2003
[13]

The compound binomial risk model wit h time-correlated claims

Yuntao Xiao and Junyi Guo. The compound binomial risk model wit h time-correlated claims. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics , 41(1):124–133, 2007

2007
[14]

Some results on absolute ruin in the perturbed ins urance risk model with investment and debit interests

Wenguang Yu. Some results on absolute ruin in the perturbed ins urance risk model with investment and debit interests. Economic Modelling, 31:625–634, 2013

2013
[15]

The absolute ru in insurance risk model with a threshold dividend strategy

Wenguang Yu, Yujuan Huang, and Chaoran Cui. The absolute ru in insurance risk model with a threshold dividend strategy. Symmetry, 10(9):377, 2018

2018
[16]

On ultimate ruin in a delayed- claims risk model

Kam C Yuen, Junyi Guo, and Kai W Ng. On ultimate ruin in a delayed- claims risk model. Journal of Applied Probability, 42(1):163–174, 2005

2005
[17]

Ruin probabilities for time-correlate d claims in the compound binomial model

Kam Chuen Yuen and JY Guo. Ruin probabilities for time-correlate d claims in the compound binomial model. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics , 29(1):47–57, 2001

2001
[19]

On the ruin problem in an erlang (2) risk mo del with delayed claims

Wei Zou and Jie-hua Xie. On the ruin problem in an erlang (2) risk mo del with delayed claims. In Interna- tional Conference on Information Computing and Applicatio ns, pages 54–61. Springer, 2010. 14

2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [11]

On the compound binomial risk model with delayed claims and randomized dividends

Kam Pui Wat, Kam Chuen Yuen, Wai Keung Li, and Xueyuan Wu. On the compound binomial risk model with delayed claims and randomized dividends. Risks, 6(1):6, 2018

work page 2018

[2] [18]

On a discrete-time risk m odel with delayed claims and dividends

Kam Chuen Yuen, Jinzhu Li, and Rong Wu. On a discrete-time risk m odel with delayed claims and dividends. Risk and Decision Analysis , 4(1):3–16, 2013

work page 2013

[3] [1]

The gerber–shiu discounted p enalty function in the delayed renewal risk process with random income

Zhen-hua Bao and Zhong-xing Ye. The gerber–shiu discounted p enalty function in the delayed renewal risk process with random income. Applied Mathematics and Computation , 184(2):857–863, 2007

work page 2007

[4] [2]

A note on the net proﬁt condition for discrete and classical risk models

Julius Damarackas and Jonas ˇSiaulys. A note on the net proﬁt condition for discrete and classical risk models. Lithuanian Mathematical Journal , 55(4):465–473, 2015

work page 2015

[5] [3]

A risk model with delayed claims

Angelos Dassios and Hongbiao Zhao. A risk model with delayed claims . Journal of Applied Probability , 50(3):686–702, 2013

work page 2013

[6] [4]

S ome stable algorithms in ruin theory and their applications

David CM Dickson, Alfredo D Egidio dos Reis, and Howard R Waters. S ome stable algorithms in ruin theory and their applications. ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , 25(2):153–175, 1995

work page 1995

[7] [5]

Complete monotonicity of the probab ility of ruin and de ﬁnettis dividend problem

Hua Dong and Chuancun Yin. Complete monotonicity of the probab ility of ruin and de ﬁnettis dividend problem. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity , 25(1):178–185, 2012

work page 2012

[8] [6]

On distributions of runs in the compound binomial risk model

Serkan Eryilmaz. On distributions of runs in the compound binomial risk model. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability , 16(1):149–159, 2014. 13

work page 2014