Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 6 minor 107 references

Physics-based super-resolved simulation of 3D elastic wave propagation adopting scalable Diffusion Transformer

T0 review · 5 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A diffusion transformer learns to add realistic 0-30 Hz frequencies to low-frequency physics-based earthquake simulations, with a zero-shot test on the 2009 L'Aquila earthquake.

desk verdict A genuinely useful DiT adaptation for broadband accelerogram synthesis, but the zero-shot evidence rests on a single L'Aquila station that may well have been in the training set. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.17308 v1 pith:EH5VHMBV submitted 2025-04-24 physics.geo-ph

Hugo Gabrielidis , Filippo Gatti , Stéphane Vialle This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.geo-ph
keywords DiffusionTransformerearthquakeaccelerogramgenerationfrequencysuper-resolutionlow-to-highmappingphysics-basedgroundmotionsimulationMulti-HeadCross-Attentionzero-shotgeneralizationpeakaccelerationprediction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a diffusion transformer trained on real earthquake recordings can act as a frequency super-resolution engine for physics-based seismic simulations: it takes a three-component accelerogram that is reliable only below about 1 Hz and reconstructs a full 0-30 Hz version that keeps the low-frequency waveform and adds believable high-frequency motion. That matters because 3D elastodynamics simulations are usually limited to low frequencies by computing cost and by uncertain knowledge of the deep Earth, while buildings and equipment respond mainly at 5-40 Hz. If the claim holds, engineers could take inexpensive low-frequency simulations from any validated solver, add high frequencies with this one trained network, and obtain design accelerograms without separate site-specific metadata. The paper reports the network does this zero-shot on both recorded signals and on a validated simulated dataset, and that it improves over the standard neural-network baseline (ANN2BB) at matching the recorded high-frequency spectrum at the tested station.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the DiT1D, a one-dimensional Diffusion Transformer built from 12 transformer layers with hidden dimension 1024, patch size 8, and 16 attention heads, adapted from image-generation diffusion transformers to three-component time histories. Its core mechanism is Multi-Head Cross-Attention (MHCA): at every denoising step the network uses the low-frequency conditioning signal $x(t)$ as attention context, which is what forces the generated broadband signal to keep the physics of the low-frequency input. Training uses the standard denoising diffusion objective, augmented by a penalty on the $L^2$ norm of the residual above 10 Hz computed in Fourier space through Parseval's identity; inference runs with the DDIM sampler so that only about 100 steps are needed. A separate lightweight CNN-LSTM takes the low-frequency input and the normalized generated waveform and predicts the broadband peak amplitude, restoring the absolute scale of the accelerogram.

What would settle it

Take a set of well-recorded earthquakes, run validated low-frequency simulations at the recording stations, feed only the simulation output to the DiT1D, and compare the generated 1-30 Hz spectra with the recordings across many stations. If the spectral fit worsens exactly where the simulation's low-frequency spectrum deviates from the filtered recording, the central conditioning assumption is the weak point; a direct version is to compare the distributions of low-pass-filtered recordings and simulation outputs at 1 Hz and check whether they overlap.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the low-to-high frequency map for earthquake ground motion is learnable in a single architecture and transferable across events and sites. The DiT1D is trained on 14,000 three-component recorded accelerograms; the conditioning is the 1 Hz low-pass-filtered version of each record, so the network never sees magnitude, distance, site class, or other metadata. At inference, that conditioning is replaced by the low-frequency output of a validated 3D elastic wave-propagation simulation, and the same network generates a broadband time history. In the single-station test on the 2009 L'Aquila earthquake, the generated signal reproduces the recorded high-frequency content better than the previous ANN2BB augmentation, with an SSIM improvement of 0.07, and the companion CNN-LSTM amplitude predictor recovers realistic peak accelerations. The paper's own caveat is that the training protocol assumes low-pass-filtered recordings and simulation outputs share a distribution, checked so far at only one station.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a 1 Hz low-pass-filtered recording and the low-frequency output of a numerical earthquake simulation look enough alike that the high frequencies learned from one transfer to the other; this match has been tested at only one station so far.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Design accelerograms for earthquake-resistant structures can be generated from low-frequency physics-based simulations alone, without asking the user to supply site or event metadata.
  • The same pre-trained network can be applied to outputs of any numerical solver, because the interface is just the low-frequency waveform.
  • Because the model learns amplitude and phase together, high-frequency content is non-stationary and tied to the conditioning waveform, unlike methods that attach random high-frequency phases.
  • Near-perfect multi-GPU scaling means training on larger databases can be held to a fixed wall-clock time by adding hardware, making retraining for new regions practical.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: If the map generalizes beyond the tested station, the main use is scenario ensembles: sample several high-frequency realizations per low-frequency simulation to represent the aleatoric part of ground motion in hazard analyses.
  • Inference: The current training pairs each recording with exactly one filtered version, which biases the model toward one-to-one outputs; pairing several low-frequency simulations with each record, or feeding the model simulation surrogates, is the natural path to genuine one-to-many generation that the paper leaves as future work.
  • Inference: The 10 Hz residual penalty probably raises fidelity at the expense of diversity; lowering the penalty coefficient should increase sample-to-sample variability, a testable trade-off directly implied by the loss.
  • Inference: The conditioning scheme is not earthquake-specific; any wave-propagation problem with reliable low-frequency numerical fields and missing high frequencies could use the same architecture.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper introduces DiT1D, a Diffusion Transformer with multi-head cross-attention layers that generates 0-30 Hz three-component accelerograms conditioned on the 1 Hz low-pass-filtered version of the target signal; at inference the conditioning is replaced by the low-frequency output of a 3D elastodynamic simulation. A CNN-LSTM network predicts the broadband PGA and rescales the normalized generated waveform. The model is trained on 14,000 ESM v2.0 records, benchmarked against UNet, UNet-DDPM, and NU-Wave2 on reconstruction metrics, and tested zero-shot on 500 STEAD records and on a single station (AQK) from the 2009 L'Aquila earthquake using BB-SPEEDset simulations. The authors report state-of-the-art metrics and perfect multi-GPU scaling on A100 nodes.

Significance. The intended application is practical and timely: converting cheap low-frequency physics-based simulations into broadband accelerograms usable for structural design, without explicit site or event metadata. The architectural contribution is sensible, the ablation of the residual penalty is informative, and the comparison with three baselines plus the measured scaling on A100 GPUs are strengths. However, the central zero-shot claim is not yet established: it rests on a single station, the quantitative results carry no error bars or test-set identification, no explicit exclusion of the test event from the training set is reported, and the acknowledged domain shift between filtered records and simulation output is unquantified. The result is therefore promising but conditional on additional evidence.

major comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 4.1, 5.1] The zero-shot demonstration at AQK is potentially contaminated by training-set leakage: the training set consists of 14,000 random ESM records with Mw >= 4 within 200 km, and the 2009 L'Aquila event is a well-recorded Italian earthquake, yet the manuscript nowhere states that L'Aquila records, or AQK specifically, were excluded from training. If the AQK recording, or the same physical record as it appears in ESM, is in the training set, the comparison in Figure 7 measures memorization rather than transfer of the low-to-high frequency map, and the central claim in Section 5.1 is not supported. Please state the exclusion explicitly and, if exclusion was not performed, retrain on a training set from which all L'Aquila records are removed and re-run the AQK test.
  2. [Sec. 5, Table 1] Each metric in Table 1 is reported as a single number with no error bars, no number of test signals, and no identification of the test set or the train/test split; the claim that DiT1D with the residual penalty 'outperforms all models in all metrics' is therefore not statistically supported. The same issue affects the SSIM improvement of 0.07 reported in Section 5.1, which is based on one station and one figure without uncertainty quantification. Please provide confidence intervals or bootstrap ranges, report the test-set composition and split procedure, and give the number of independent samples behind each metric.
  3. [Sec. 3.1, 4.1, 5.1] Because training pairs are constructed as (x0 = F_{f<=1Hz}(y0), y0), the model has never seen the conditioning distribution of physics-based simulation output; the transfer from filtered ESM records to BB-SPEEDset synthetics is an unquantified domain shift, as the paper itself acknowledges in Section 3.1. The single-station AQK example is insufficient to characterize this shift. Please quantify the distributional mismatch, for instance by comparing spectral statistics of 1-Hz low-passed ESM records with those of SPEED low-frequency synthetics at multiple stations and events, and test the method on a larger held-out set of BB-SPEEDset scenarios with several stations per event.
  4. [Sec. 3.1, Eq. (9)-(10)] The residual penalty is defined inconsistently: the text defines r(y_tau, y0)(t) = F_{f>=10Hz}(y_tau(t) - y0(t)), but Equation (10) computes the expectation over r(y_tau, x0), where x0 is the conditioning signal. Since x0 contains no energy above 1 Hz, replacing y0 by x0 changes the penalty from a reconstruction term that drives the generated high-frequency content toward the target into a term that primarily penalizes the high-frequency energy of the noisy sample itself. Please clarify which argument is used in the implementation and, if the implementation differs from the text, state the exact residual expression; this is essential for reproducing the reported improvement from the lambda R term.
  5. [Sec. 6] The central claim that the generated signals 'ensure the fulfillment of the minimum observable physics' requires that the low-frequency conditioning be preserved, yet the Discussion states that DiT1D 'may slightly deviate from the conditioning signal x(t) at low frequency' and Figure 7 shows visible low-frequency differences. This is a load-bearing point for the method's stated purpose. Please quantify the deviation in the conditioning band, for example with a relative L2 error between the 0-1 Hz part of the generated signal and the conditioning signal, and discuss the implications if the deviation is non-negligible.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. 3.1, Algorithm 2] The sampling update in Algorithm 2 does not match the DDIM update written in Equation (11); please align the notation and formulas so that the pseudocode can be reproduced without ambiguity.
  2. [Sec. 5, Table 1] The entry 'UNet DDPM 1.1 -3' appears to be a formatting error for 1.1E-3, and the model name is written inconsistently as 'NU-wave-2' in the text and 'NU-Wave2' in the table; please standardize.
  3. [Sec. 4.2] In the paragraph describing BB-SPEEDset, 'o widen the frequency band' should read 'to widen the frequency band'.
  4. [Sec. 5.2] The 'perfect speedup' and 'perfect size up' statements are based on single measured runs for each configuration; please report repeated runs or error margins, since small timing variations could affect the claim of perfectly parallel behavior.
  5. [Sec. 2] The sentence 'The DiT1D does not need to learn amplitude and phase separately [such as done by 20, 9]' is grammatically awkward and should be rephrased for clarity.
  6. [General] The manuscript does not state whether code or trained weights will be made available; given the stochastic nature of diffusion models and the importance of the exact loss in Equations (8)-(10), a code or model release would substantially aid reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the low-to-high-frequency map is learned from recorded ESM data and tested on external STEAD/BB-SPEEDset benchmarks; low-pass conditioning is a frequency-masking strategy, not a fitted tautology.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is a conditional diffusion model: Eq. (8) trains NN_theta to denoise y_tau conditioned on x0 = F_{f<=1Hz}(y0), and Eq. (11) samples the broadband output conditioned on x from BB-SPEEDset at inference. This is standard frequency-masked super-resolution, not a self-definitional loop: x0 is a deterministic function of y0, but the high-frequency content above 1 Hz is absent from x0, so the loss forces the network to synthesize that content from the learned data distribution. The paper explicitly acknowledges that the model is not reconstructing the target and can deviate from the conditioning (Section 6: 'the DiT1D may slightly deviate from the conditioning signal x(t) at low frequency'), which rules out an identity-by-construction reading. The CNN-LSTM PGA rescaling is a supervised fit on the same database and is presented as such, not as a physics-derived parameter, and it does not define the waveform content. The comparison against SPEED+ANN2BB is an external benchmark, and the 'improved SSIM by 0.07' claim is an empirical result rather than a renamed input. The Section 3.1 'strong assumption' that low-pass-filtered recordings match physics-based simulation outputs is an acknowledged distribution-shift assumption, not a circular step. The few self-citations (e.g., Gatti and Clouteau [26] and Perrone et al. [71]) are contextual or future-work mentions and do not supply the load-bearing low-to-high-frequency map. A separate validation-integrity concern is that Section 4.1 does not state that the 2009 L'Aquila/AQK record was excluded from the 14,000 ESM training samples, so the single 'zero-shot' demonstration could in principle be affected by data leakage; this is a benchmark-integrity risk, not a circularity of the derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a domain-shift assumption: low-pass-filtered recordings used in training represent the same conditional distribution as physics-based simulation outputs at inference. Additional assumptions include representativeness of the ESM training set and the Gaussian diffusion formulation. The method has several hand-tuned constants (1 Hz cutoff, 10 Hz penalty cutoff, lambda, guidance scale, DDIM steps) that are load-bearing for the reported performance. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Conditioning cutoff frequency = 1 Hz
    Chosen to align with Graves and Pitarka and historical HPC limits; defines the physics-synthesis split (Section 4.1).
  • Residual penalty cutoff frequency = 10 Hz
    Arbitrarily chosen after trial and error; defines the high-frequency band penalized in R(theta) (Section 3.1).
  • Residual penalty coefficient lambda = 0.01
    Tuned by hand after 'some tuning'; balances ELBO and high-frequency residual loss (Section 3.1).
  • Guidance scale = 1
    Classifier-free guidance scale set to 1, no sweep reported (Section 3.1).
  • DDIM inference steps = 100
    Reduces sampling from 1000 steps; no ablation of step count on output quality is reported (Section 3.1).
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Training-time conditioning x0 = F_{f<=1Hz}(y0) has the same distribution as inference-time physics-based simulation output x.
    Section 3.1 calls this 'a strong assumption [that] resembles to a data masking, but in the frequency domain'; it is what justifies zero-shot transfer to PBS.
  • domain assumption The ESM training set of 14,000 records (Mw>=4, epicentral distance <=200 km) is representative of sites and events encountered at inference.
    Zero-shot generalization relies on this coverage; see Section 4.1.
  • domain assumption Ground-motion accelerograms are well-modeled by diffusion with additive Gaussian noise in the time domain using the chosen beta schedule and DDIM reverse steps.
    Adopted from Ho et al. [33] and Song et al. [84] without seismic-specific justification; see Section 3.1.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Physics-based super-resolved simulation of 3D elastic wave propagation adopting scalable Diffusion Transformer." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EH5VHMBV

@misc{pith2026250417308,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Physics-based super-resolved simulation of 3D elastic wave propagation adopting scalable Diffusion Transformer},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EH5VHMBV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.17308}
}
read the original abstract

In this study, we develop a Diffusion Transformer (referred as to DiT1D) for synthesizing realistic earthquake time histories. The DiT1D generates realistic broadband accelerograms (0-30 Hz resolution), constrained at low frequency by 3-dimensional (3D) elastodynamics numerical simulations, ensuring the fulfillment of the minimum observable physics. The DiT1D architecture, successfully adopted in super-resolution image generation, is trained on recorded single-station 3-components (3C) accelerograms. Thanks to Multi-Head Cross-Attention (MHCA) layers, we guide the DiT1D inference by enforcing the low-frequency part of the accelerogram spectrum into it. The DiT1D learns the low-to-high frequency map from the recorded accelerograms, duly normalized, and successfully transfer it to synthetic time histories. The latter are low-frequency by nature, because of the lack of knowledge on the underground structure of the Earth, demanded to fully calibrate the numerical model. We developed a CNN-LSTM lightweight network in conjunction with the DiT1D, so to predict the peak amplitude of the broadband signal from its low-pass-filtered counterpart, and rescale the normalized accelerograms rendered by the DiT1D. Despite the DiT1D being agnostic to any earthquake event peculiarities (magnitude, site conditions, etc.), it showcases remarkable zero-shot prediction realism when applied to the output of validated earthquake simulations. The generated time histories are viable input accelerograms for earthquake-resistant structural design and the pre-trained DiT1D holds a huge potential to integrate full-scale fault-to-structure digital twins of earthquake-prone regions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.17308 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. After hyper-parameter optimization, the best model configuration consists into a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A review of convolutional neural networks

    Arohan Ajit, Koustav Acharya, and Abhishek Samanta. A review of convolutional neural networks. In 2020 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Information Technology and Engineering (ic-ETITE) , pages 1–5, 2020. doi : 10.1109/ic-ETITE47903.2020.049

    arXiv 2020

  2. [2]

    Anderson, J

    R. Anderson, J. Andrej, A. Barker, J. Bramwell, J.-S. Camier, J. Cerveny, V. Dobrev, Y. Dudouit, A. Fisher, Tz. Kolev, W. Pazner, M. Stowell, V. Tomov, I. Akkerman, J. Dahm, D. Medina, and S. Zampini. MFEM : a modular finite element methods library. Computers & Mathematics with Applications , 81 :42–74, 2021. doi : 10.1016/j.camwa.2020.06.009

    doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2020.06.009 2021

  3. [3]

    Martin Mai

    Tariq Anwar Aquib and P. Martin Mai. Broadband ground-motion simulations with machine-learning-based high-frequency waves from fourier neural operators. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America , 114(6) : 2846–2868, September 2024. ISSN 0037-1106. doi : 10.1785/0120240027. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1785/ 0120240027. https ://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/s...

    work page doi:10.1785/0120240027 2024

  4. [4]

    Jimmy Lei Ba, Jamie Ryan Kiros, and Geoffrey E. Hinton. Layer normalization. (arXiv :1607.06450), July 2016. doi : 10.48550/arXiv.1607.06450. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.06450. arXiv :1607.06450 [stat]

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1607.06450 2016

  5. [5]

    Li, Hamid Kazemi, Furong Huang, Micah Goldblum, Jonas Geiping, and Tom Goldstein

    Arpit Bansal, Eitan Borgnia, Hong-Min Chu, Jie S. Li, Hamid Kazemi, Furong Huang, Micah Goldblum, Jonas Geiping, and Tom Goldstein. Cold diffusion : inverting arbitrary image transforms without noise. InProceedings of the 37th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS ’23, Red Hook, NY, USA,

  6. [6]

    Baratta, Joseph P

    Igor A. Baratta, Joseph P. Dean, Jørgen S. Dokken, Michal HABERA, Jack HALE, Chris N. Richardson, Marie E. Rognes, Matthew W. Scroggs, Nathan Sime, and Garth N. Wells. DOLFINx : The next generation FEniCS problem solving environment. December 2023

    2023

  7. [7]

    Samuel A. Barnett. Convergence Problems with Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), June 2018. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1806.11382. arXiv :1806.11382 [cs, stat]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    High resolution seismic waveform generation using denoising diffusion

    Andreas Bergmeister, Kadek Hendrawan Palgunadi, Andrea Bosisio, Laura Ermert, Maria Koroni, Nathana ¨el Perraudin, Simon Dirmeier, and Men-Andrin Meier. High resolution seismic waveform generation using denoising diffusion. (arXiv :2410.19343), October 2024. URLhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2410.19343. arXiv :2410.19343 [physics]

    arXiv

Show all 107 references
  1. [9]

    Zhengfa Bi, Nori Nakata, Rie Nakata, Pu Ren, Xinming Wu, and Michael W. Mahoney. Advancing data-driven broadband seismic wavefield simulation with multi-conditional diffusion model. (arXiv :2501.14348), January

    arXiv

  2. [10]

    Cao et al

    R. Cao et al. GANs in speech enhancement and their relevance to seismic denoising. Journal of Acoustical Society, 228(1) :119–133, 2022

    2022

  3. [11]

    Assessing the impact of regional geology on the ground motion model variability at the kashiwazaki-kariwa nuclear power plant (japan) via physics- based numerical simulation

    David Castro-Cruz, Filippo Gatti, and Fernando Lopez-Caballero. Assessing the impact of regional geology on the ground motion model variability at the kashiwazaki-kariwa nuclear power plant (japan) via physics- based numerical simulation. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineeri...

    2021

  4. [12]

    Impact of regional geology on the prediction of physics-based earthquake simulations : the prediction of the seismic response at the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant (Japan)

    David Castro-Cruz, Filippo Gatti, and Fernando Lopez-Caballero. Impact of regional geology on the prediction of physics-based earthquake simulations : the prediction of the seismic response at the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant (Japan). Submitted at Soil Dynamics and E...

    2021

  5. [13]

    Quantitative comparison of four numerical predictions of 3D ground motion in the Grenoble Valley, France

    Emmanuel Chaljub, Peter Moczo, Seiji Tsuno, Pierre-Yves Bard, Jozef Kristek, Martin K ¨aser, Marco Stupaz- zini, and Miriam Kristekova. Quantitative comparison of four numerical predictions of 3D ground motion in the Grenoble Valley, France. Bulletin of the Seismological Socie...

  6. [14]

    Stanley H. Chan. Tutorial on diffusion models for imaging and vision. (arXiv :2403.18103), January 2025. doi : 10.48550/arXiv.2403.18103. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.18103. arXiv :2403.18103 [cs]

    2025 doi arXiv

  7. [15]

    Ground motion simulation via generative adversarial network

    Kai Chen, Hua Pan, Meng Zhang, and Zhi-Heng Li. Ground motion simulation via generative adversarial network. Applied Geophysics, December 2024. ISSN 1993-0658. doi : 10.1007/s11770-025-1154-7. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s11770-025-1154-7

    2024 doi

  8. [16]

    Simple and Controllable Music Generation, June 2023

    Jade Copet, Felix Kreuk, Itai Gat, Tal Remez, David Kant, Gabriel Synnaeve, Yossi Adi, and Alexandre D´efossez. Simple and Controllable Music Generation, June 2023. URLhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2306.05284. arXiv :2306.05284 [cs, eess]. 18 A preprint - 25 avril 2025

    2023 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Influential parameters on 3-D synthetic ground motions in a sedimentary basin derived from global sensitivity analysis

    F De Martin, E Chaljub, P Thierry, P Sochala, F Dupros, E Maufroy, B Hadri, A Benaichouche, and F Hollender. Influential parameters on 3-D synthetic ground motions in a sedimentary basin derived from global sensitivity analysis. Geophysical Journal International, 227(3) :1795–...

    2021 doi

  10. [18]

    Adversarial Audio Synthesis, February 2019

    Chris Donahue, Julian McAuley, and Miller Puckette. Adversarial Audio Synthesis, February 2019. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.04208. arXiv :1802.04208 [cs] version : 3

    2019 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Deep diffusion mo- dels for seismic processing.Computers & Geosciences, 177 :105377, August 2023

    Ricard Durall, Ammar Ghanim, Mario Ruben Fernandez, Norman Ettrich, and Janis Keuper. Deep diffusion mo- dels for seismic processing.Computers & Geosciences, 177 :105377, August 2023. ISSN 00983004. doi : 10.1016/ j.cageo.2023.105377. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrie...

    2023

  12. [20]

    Reza D. D. Esfahani, Fabrice Cotton, Matthias Ohrnberger, and Frank Scherbaum. TFCGAN : Nonstationary Ground-Motion Simulation in the Time–Frequency Domain Using Conditional Genera- tive Adversarial Network (CGAN) and Phase Retrieval Methods. Bulletin of the Seismological So- ...

    2023

  13. [21]

    Physics-based seismic input for engineering applications : a case study in the aterno river valley, central italy

    Lorenza Evangelista, Sergio Del Gaudio, Chiara Smerzini, Anna d’Onofrio, Gaetano Festa, Iunio Iervolino, Luigi Landolfi, Roberto Paolucci, Antonio Santo, and Francesco Silvestri. Physics-based seismic input for engineering applications : a case study in the aterno river valley...

    2017 doi

  14. [22]

    Florez, Michaelangelo Caporale, Pakpoom Buabthong, Zachary E

    Manuel A. Florez, Michaelangelo Caporale, Pakpoom Buabthong, Zachary E. Ross, Domniki Asimaki, and Men-Andrin Meier. Data-driven synthesis of broadband earthquake ground motions using artificial intelligence. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America , 112(4) :1979–1996...

    1979

  15. [23]

    18.9Pflopss Nonlinear Earthquake Simulation on Sunway TaihuLight : Enabling Depiction of 18-Hz and 8-meter Scenarios

    Haohuan Fu, Conghui He, Bingwei Chen, Zekun Yin, Zhenguo Zhang, Wenqiang Zhang, Tingjian Zhang, Wei Xue, Weiguo Liu, Wanwang Yin, Guangwen Yang, and Xiaofei Chen. 18.9Pflopss Nonlinear Earthquake Simulation on Sunway TaihuLight : Enabling Depiction of 18-Hz and 8-meter Scenari...

    2017

  16. [24]

    Gatti, L

    F. Gatti, L. De Carvalho Paludo, A. Svay, F. Lopez-Caballero, R. Cottereau, and D. Clouteau. Investigation of the earthquake ground motion coherence in heterogeneous non-linear soil deposits. Procedia Engineering, 199(Supplement C) :2354–2359, 2017. ISSN 1877-7058. doi : 10.10...

    2017 doi

  17. [25]

    Gatti, S

    F. Gatti, S. Touhami, F. Lopez-Caballero, R. Paolucci, D. Clouteau, V. Alves Fernandes, M. Kham, and F. Vol- doire. Broad-band 3-D earthquake simulation at nuclear site by an all-embracing source-to-structure approach. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering , 115 :263–280, 2...

    2018 doi

  18. [26]

    Towards blending physics-based numerical simulations and seismic databases using generative adversarial network

    Filippo Gatti and Didier Clouteau. Towards blending physics-based numerical simulations and seismic databases using generative adversarial network. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 372 :113421,

  19. [27]

    Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio

    Ian J. Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. Generative Adversarial Networks, June 2014. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/ 1406.2661. arXiv :1406.2661 [cs, stat]

    2014 arXiv

  20. [28]

    R. W. Graves and A. Pitarka. Broadband ground-motion simulation using a hybrid approach. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America , 100(5A) :2095–2123, October 2010. ISSN 0037-1106. doi : 10.1785/ 0120100057. URL https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/bssa/article/100/5A/209...

    2010

  21. [29]

    Nu-wave 2 : A general neural audio upsampling model for various sampling rates

    Seungu Han and Junhyeok Lee. Nu-wave 2 : A general neural audio upsampling model for various sampling rates. In Interspeech 2022, Interspeech 2022, pages 4401–4405. ISCA, September 2022. doi : 10.21437/interspeech. 2022-45. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2022-45. 1...

    2022 doi

  22. [30]

    Diffit : Diffusion vision transformers for image generation

    Ali Hatamizadeh, Jiaming Song, Guilin Liu, Jan Kautz, and Arash Vahdat. Diffit : Diffusion vision transformers for image generation. In Ale ˇs Leonardis, Elisa Ricci, Stefan Roth, Olga Russakovsky, Torsten Sattler, and G¨ ul Varol, editors, Computer Vision – ECCV 2024 , pages ...

    2024

  23. [31]

    Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners

    Kaiming He, Xinlei Chen, Saining Xie, Yanghao Li, Piotr Dollar, and Ross Girshick. Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners. In 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), page 15979–15988, New Orleans, LA, USA, June 2022. IEEE. ISBN 978...

    2022

  24. [32]

    Classifier-free diffusion guidance

    Jonathan Ho and Tim Salimans. Classifier-free diffusion guidance. (arXiv :2207.12598), July 2022. doi : 10.48550/arXiv.2207.12598. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.12598. arXiv :2207.12598 [cs]

    2022 doi arXiv

  25. [33]

    Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models

    Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models. (arXiv :2006.11239), December 2020. doi : 10.48550/arXiv.2006.11239. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.11239

    2006 doi arXiv

  26. [34]

    Long short-term memory

    Sepp Hochreiter and J¨ urgen Schmidhuber. Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8) :1735–1780, November 1997. ISSN 0899-7667, 1530-888X. doi : 10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735. URL https://direct. mit.edu/neco/article/9/8/1735-1780/6109

    1997 doi

  27. [35]

    Application of Macro-Micro Analysis Method to Estimate Strong Motion Distribution and Resulting Structure Response

    Muneo Hori and Tsuyoshi Ichimura. Application of Macro-Micro Analysis Method to Estimate Strong Motion Distribution and Resulting Structure Response

  28. [36]

    Ground-motion generations using multi-label conditional embedding–conditional denoising diffusion probabilistic model (ml–cddpm)

    Yanwen Huang, Xiaodan Sun, Junjie You, Cheng Yang, Dagang Lu, and Jie Zhang. Ground-motion generations using multi-label conditional embedding–conditional denoising diffusion probabilistic model (ml–cddpm). Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 191 :109274, April 2025. ISS...

    2025 doi

  29. [37]

    Comprehensive numerical analysis of fault-structure systems–Computation of the large-scale seismic structural response to a given earthquake scenario–

    T Ichimura, M Hori, PE Quinay, MLL Wijerathne, T Suzuki, and S Noguchi. Comprehensive numerical analysis of fault-structure systems–Computation of the large-scale seismic structural response to a given earthquake scenario–. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 41(4) :...

    2012 doi

  30. [38]

    Performance Enhancement of Three-Dimensional Soil Structure Model via Optimization for Estimating Seismic Behavior of Buried Pipelines

    Tsuyoshi Ichimura, Kohei Fujita, Atsushi Yoshiyuki, Pher Errol Quinay, Muneo Hori, and Takashi Sakanoue. Performance Enhancement of Three-Dimensional Soil Structure Model via Optimization for Estimating Seismic Behavior of Buried Pipelines. Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami , ...

    2017 doi

  31. [39]

    Hybrid physics-based/data-based seismic ground motion generator of a site

    Gottfried Jacquet. Hybrid physics-based/data-based seismic ground motion generator of a site . PhD thesis, Universit´e Paris-Saclay, Gif sur Yvette, 2024. URL https://cnrs.hal.science/tel-04654168/

    2024

  32. [40]

    MoFEM : An open source, parallel finite element library

    Lukasz Kaczmarczyk, Zahur Ullah, Karol Lewandowski, Xuan Meng, Xiao-Yi Zhou, Ignatios Athanasiadis, Hoang Nguyen, Christophe-Alexandre Chalons-Mouriesse, Euan Richardson, Euan Miur, Andrei Shvarts, Me- bratu Wakeni, and Chris Pearce. MoFEM : An open source, parallel finite ele...

    2020 doi

  33. [41]

    Kingma and Jimmy Ba

    Diederik P. Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam : A Method for Stochastic Optimization, January 2017. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980. arXiv :1412.6980 [cs]

    2017 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Kingma and Max Welling

    Diederik P. Kingma and Max Welling. Auto-encoding variational bayes. (arXiv :1312.6114), December 2022. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6114. arXiv :1312.6114 [cs, stat]

    2022 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Kirk, John W

    Benjamin S. Kirk, John W. Peterson, Roy H. Stogner, and Graham F. Carey. ¡code¿libMesh¡/code¿ : a C++ library for parallel adaptive mesh refinement/coarsening simulations. Engineering with Computers, 22(3–4) :237–254, 2006

    2006

  36. [44]

    Korres, F

    M. Korres, F. Lopez-Caballero, V. Alves Fernandes, F. Gatti, I. Zentner, F. Voldoire, D. Clouteau, and D. Castro- Cruz. Enhanced seismic response prediction of critical structures via 3d regional scale physics-based earthquake simulation. Journal of Earthquake Engineering , 27...

    2023

  37. [45]

    Kristekova, J

    M. Kristekova, J. Kristek, and P. Moczo. Time-frequency misfit and goodness-of-fit criteria for quantita- tive comparison of time signals. Geophysical Journal International , 178(2) :813–825, August 2009. ISSN 0956540X, 1365246X. doi : 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04177.x. URL htt...

    2009 arXiv

  38. [46]

    NU-Wave : A Diffusion Probabilistic Model for Neural Audio Upsampling

    Junhyeok Lee and Seungu Han. NU-Wave : A Diffusion Probabilistic Model for Neural Audio Upsampling. In Interspeech 2021, pages 1634–1638, June 2021. doi : 10.21437/Interspeech.2021-36. URL https://link. springer.com/10.1007/s10596-021-10052-3 . 20 A preprint - 25 avril 2025

    2021 doi

  39. [47]

    Synthetic ground motions in heterogeneous geologies : the hemew-3d dataset for scientific machine learning

    Fanny Lehmann, Filippo Gatti, Micha¨el Bertin, and Didier Clouteau. Synthetic ground motions in heterogeneous geologies : the hemew-3d dataset for scientific machine learning. January 2024. doi : 10.5194/essd-2023-470. URL https://essd.copernicus.org/preprints/essd-2023-470/

    2024 doi

  40. [48]

    ConSeisGen : Controllable Synthetic Seismic Waveform Generation

    Yuanming Li, Dongsik Yoon, Bonhwa Ku, and Hanseok Ko. ConSeisGen : Controllable Synthetic Seismic Waveform Generation. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 21 :1–5, 2024. ISSN 1545-598X, 1558-

    2024

  41. [49]

    Decoupled Weight Decay Regularization, January 2019

    Ilya Loshchilov and Frank Hutter. Decoupled Weight Decay Regularization, January 2019. URLhttp://arxiv. org/abs/1711.05101. arXiv :1711.05101 [cs, math]

    2019 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Dpm-solver : A fast ode solver for diffusion probabilistic model sampling in around 10 steps

    Cheng Lu, Yuhao Zhou, Fan Bao, Jianfei Chen, Chongxuan Li, and Jun Zhu. Dpm-solver : A fast ode solver for diffusion probabilistic model sampling in around 10 steps. (arXiv :2206.00927), October 2022. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.00927. arXiv :2206.00927 [cs, stat]

    2022 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Engineering strong motion database (esm), version 2.0, July 2020

    Lucia Luzi, Giovanni Lanzano, Chiara Felicetta, Maria Clara D’ Amico, Emiliano Russo, Sara Sgobba, Francesca Pacor, and ORFEUS Working Group 5. Engineering strong motion database (esm), version 2.0, July 2020. URL https://data.ingv.it/en/dataset/418

    2020

  44. [52]

    A wavelet tour of signal processing : the sparse way

    St ´ephane Mallat. A wavelet tour of signal processing : the sparse way . Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam Boston, 3rd ed edition, 2009. ISBN 978-0-12-374370-1

    2009

  45. [53]

    Deep learning-based stochastic ground mo- tion modeling using generative adversarial and convolutional neural networks

    Mohsen Masoudifar, Mojtaba Mahsuli, and Ertugrul Taciroglu. Deep learning-based stochastic ground mo- tion modeling using generative adversarial and convolutional neural networks. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2025

    2025

  46. [54]

    Maufroy, E

    E. Maufroy, E. Chaljub, F. Hollender, J. Kristek, P. Moczo, P. Klin, E. Priolo, A. Iwaki, T. Iwata, V. Etienne, F. De Martin, N. P. Theodoulidis, M. Manakou, C. Guyonnet-Benaize, K. Pitilakis, and P.-Y. Bard. Earthquake Ground Motion in the Mygdonian Basin, Greece : The E2VP V...

    2015 doi

  47. [55]

    3D numerical simulation and ground motion prediction : Verification, validation and beyond–Lessons from the E2VP project

    E Maufroy, E Chaljub, F Hollender, P-Y Bard, J Kristek, P Moczo, Florent De Martin, N Theodoulidis, M Manakou, C Guyonnet-Benaize, et al. 3D numerical simulation and ground motion prediction : Verification, validation and beyond–Lessons from the E2VP project. Soil Dynamics and...

    2016 doi

  48. [56]

    I Mazzieri, M Stupazzini, R Guidotti, and C Smerzini. Speed : Spectral elements in elastodynamics with discontinuous galerkin : a non-conforming approach for 3d multi-scale problems : Speed : A nonconforming approach for 3d multiscale problems. International Journal for Numeri...

    2013 doi

  49. [57]

    EQSIM-A multidisciplinary framework for fault-to-structure earthquake simulations on exascale computers, part II : Regional simulations of building response

    David McCallen, Floriana Petrone, Mamun Miah, Arben Pitarka, Arthur Rodgers, and Norman Abrahamson. EQSIM-A multidisciplinary framework for fault-to-structure earthquake simulations on exascale computers, part II : Regional simulations of building response. Earthquake Spectra,...

    doi

  50. [58]

    Mostafa Mousavi, Yixiao Sheng, Weiqiang Zhu, and Gregory C

    S. Mostafa Mousavi, Yixiao Sheng, Weiqiang Zhu, and Gregory C. Beroza. Stanford earthquake dataset (stead) : A global data set of seismic signals for ai. IEEE Access, 7 :179464–179476, 2019. ISSN 2169-3536. doi : 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2947848. URL https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/doc...

    2019

  51. [59]

    Mostafa Mousavi, Weiqiang Zhu, William Ellsworth, and Gregory Beroza

    S. Mostafa Mousavi, Weiqiang Zhu, William Ellsworth, and Gregory Beroza. Unsupervised clustering of seismic signals using deep convolutional autoencoders. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters , 16 (11) :1693–1697, November 2019. ISSN 1545-598X, 1558-0571. doi : 10.1109/L...

    2019

  52. [60]

    Pavan Mohan Neelamraju, Jahnabi Basu, and S. T. G. Raghukanth. Ground motion model for acceleration response spectra using conditional-generative adversarial network. Natural Hazards, November 2024. ISSN 1573-0840. doi : 10.1007/s11069-024-06988-1. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/...

    2024 doi

  53. [61]

    Synthesis of broadband ground motions using embedding and neural networks

    Tomohisa Okazaki, Hirotaka Hachiya, Naonori Ueda, Asako Iwaki, Takahiro Maeda, and Hiroyuki Fujiwara. Synthesis of broadband ground motions using embedding and neural networks. 2019. URL https://api. semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:227646200

    2019

  54. [62]

    Simulation of broad-band ground motions with consistent long-period and short-period components using the wasserstein interpolation of acceleration envelopes

    Tomohisa Okazaki, Hirotaka Hachiya, Asako Iwaki, Takahiro Maeda, Hiroyuki Fujiwara, and Naonori Ueda. Simulation of broad-band ground motions with consistent long-period and short-period components using the wasserstein interpolation of acceleration envelopes. Geophysical Jour...

  55. [63]

    Ground-motion prediction model based on neural networks to extract site properties from observational records

    Tomohisa Okazaki, Nobuyuki Morikawa, Asako Iwaki, Hiroyuki Fujiwara, Tomoharu Iwata, and Naonori Ueda. Ground-motion prediction model based on neural networks to extract site properties from observational records. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America , 111(4) :1740...

    2021

  56. [64]

    Integrating neural operators with diffusion models improves spectral representation in turbulence modeling

    Vivek Oommen, Aniruddha Bora, Zhen Zhang, and George Em Karniadakis. Integrating neural operators with diffusion models improves spectral representation in turbulence modeling. (arXiv :2409.08477), September 2024. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.08477. arXiv :2409.08477 [cs]

    2024 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Large-scale 3d seismic response analysis considering soil liquefaction in an urban area using the supercomputer “fugaku”

    Yuichi Otsuka, Yukio Tamari, Kohei Fujita, and Tsuyoshi Ichimura. Large-scale 3d seismic response analysis considering soil liquefaction in an urban area using the supercomputer “fugaku”. Japanese Geotechnical Society Special Publication, 10(46) :1735–1740, 2024. ISSN 2188-802...

    2024 doi

  58. [66]

    Record processing in ITACA, the New Italian Strong-Motion Database , volume 14, pages 99–113

    Roberto Paolucci, Francesca Pacor, Rodolfo Puglia, Gabriele Ameri, Carlo Cauzzi, and Marco Massa. Record processing in ITACA, the New Italian Strong-Motion Database , volume 14, pages 99–113. 11 2011. ISBN 978-94-007-0151-9. doi : 10.1007/978-94-007-0152-6{\}8

    2011 doi

  59. [67]

    Ozcebe, Chiara Smerzini, and Marco Stupazzini

    Roberto Paolucci, Filippo Gatti, Maria Infantino, Ali G. Ozcebe, Chiara Smerzini, and Marco Stupazzini. Broad- band ground motions from 3D physics-based numerical simulations using Artificial Neural Networks. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 108((3A)) :1272–12...

    2018 doi

  60. [68]

    Bb-speedset : A validated dataset of broadband near-source earthquake ground motions from 3d physics-based numerical simulations

    Roberto Paolucci, Chiara Smerzini, and Manuela Vanini. Bb-speedset : A validated dataset of broadband near-source earthquake ground motions from 3d physics-based numerical simulations. Bulletin of the Seis- mological Society of America , 111(5) :2527–2545, October 2021. ISSN 0...

    2021 doi

  61. [69]

    Pascual, A

    S. Pascual, A. Bonafonte, and J. Serr `a. SEGAN : speech enhancement generative adversarial network. CoRR, abs/1703.09452, 2017. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.09452

    2017 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Scalable diffusion models with transformers, 2023

    William Peebles and Saining Xie. Scalable diffusion models with transformers, 2023. URL https://arxiv. org/abs/2212.09748

    2023 arXiv

  63. [71]

    URL https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/bssa/article/111/4/ 1740/597791/Ground-Motion-Prediction-Model-Based-on-Neural

    doi : 10.1785/0120200339. URL https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/bssa/article/111/4/ 1740/597791/Ground-Motion-Prediction-Model-Based-on-Neural

    doi

  64. [72]

    Refinements to the Graves–Pitarka Kinematic Rupture Generator, Including a Dynamically Consistent Slip-Rate Function, Applied to the 2019 Mw 7.1 Ridgecrest Earthquake

    Arben Pitarka, Robert Graves, Kojiro Irikura, Ken Miyakoshi, Changjiang Wu, Hiroshi Kawase, Arthur Rod- gers, and David McCallen. Refinements to the Graves–Pitarka Kinematic Rupture Generator, Including a Dynamically Consistent Slip-Rate Function, Applied to the 2019 Mw 7.1 Ri...

    2019 doi

  65. [73]

    Large-scale simulation of seismic wave motion : A review

    Babak Poursartip, Arash Fathi, and John L Tassoulas. Large-scale simulation of seismic wave motion : A review. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 129 :105909, 2020. ISSN 0267-7261. doi : 10.1016/j.soildyn.2019. 105909. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pi...

    2020 doi

  66. [75]

    CyberShake Earthquake Fault Rupture Modeling and Ground motion Simulations for the Southwest Iceland Transform Zone

    Otilio Rojas, Marisol Monterrubio-Velasco, Juan E Rodr´ıguez, Scott Callaghan, Claudia Abril, Benedikt Holldor- son, Milad Kowsari, Farnaz Bayat, Kim Olsen, and Josep de. CyberShake Earthquake Fault Rupture Modeling and Ground motion Simulations for the Southwest Iceland Trans...

    2024

  67. [76]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Bj ¨orn Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. (arXiv :2112.10752), April 2022. doi : 10.48550/arXiv.2112.10752. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.10752. arXiv :2112.10752 [cs]

    2022 doi arXiv

  68. [77]

    U-net : Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation

    Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox. U-net : Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. (arXiv :1505.04597), May 2015. doi : 10.48550/arXiv.1505.04597. URL http://arxiv.org/ abs/1505.04597. arXiv :1505.04597 [cs]

    2015 doi arXiv

  69. [78]

    Sabetta and A

    F. Sabetta and A. Pugliese. Estimation of response spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground motions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 86(2) :337–352, 1996. 22 A preprint - 25 avril 2025

    1996

  70. [79]

    Integrating fourier neural operators with diffusion models to improve spectral representation of synthetic earthquake ground motion response

    Niccol `o Perrone, Fanny Lehmann, Hugo Gabrielidis, Stefania Fresca, and Filippo Gatti. Integrating fourier neural operators with diffusion models to improve spectral representation of synthetic earthquake ground motion response. (arXiv :2504.00757), April 2025. doi : 10.48550...

    2025 doi

  71. [80]

    Ness2.0 : An updated version of the worldwide dataset for calibrating and adjusting ground-motion models in near source

    Sara Sgobba, Chiara Felicetta, Giovanni Lanzano, Fadel Ramadan, Maria D’ Amico, and Francesca Pacor. Ness2.0 : An updated version of the worldwide dataset for calibrating and adjusting ground-motion models in near source. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America , 111(...

    2021

  72. [81]

    Aftershock ground motion prediction model based on conditional convolutional generative adversarial networks.Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 133 :108354, 2024

    Jiaxu Shen, Bo Ni, Yinjun Ding, Jiecheng Xiong, Zilan Zhong, and Jun Chen. Aftershock ground motion prediction model based on conditional convolutional generative adversarial networks.Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 133 :108354, 2024. ISSN 0952-1976. doi :...

    2024

  73. [82]

    Smerzini and M

    C. Smerzini and M. Villani. Broadband numerical simulations in complex near-field geological configura- tions : The case of the 2009 mw 6.3 l’aquila earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of Ame- rica, 102(6) :2436–2451, December 2012. ISSN 0037-1106. doi : 10.1785/...

    2009 doi

  74. [83]

    arXiv :2407.15089 [physics]

    URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.15089. arXiv :2407.15089 [physics]

    arXiv

  75. [84]

    Denoising Diffusion Implicit Models, October 2022

    Jiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, and Stefano Ermon. Denoising Diffusion Implicit Models, October 2022. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.02502. arXiv :2010.02502 [cs]

    2022 arXiv

  76. [85]

    Integrated assessment of basin effects on seismic damage : A coupled 3d sem-fem approach with domain reduction method

    Valeria Soto and Fernando Lopez-Caballero. Integrated assessment of basin effects on seismic damage : A coupled 3d sem-fem approach with domain reduction method. January 2024. doi : 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3872449/v1. URL https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-3872449/v1

    2024 doi

  77. [86]

    Physics-based probabilistic seismic hazard and loss assessment in large urban areas : A simplified application to Istanbul

    Marco Stupazzini, Maria Infantino, Alexander Allmann, and Roberto Paolucci. Physics-based probabilistic seismic hazard and loss assessment in large urban areas : A simplified application to Istanbul. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 50(1) :99–115, 2021. doi : http...

    2021 doi

  78. [87]

    On Catastrophic Forgetting and Mode Collapse in Generative Adversarial Networks, March 2020

    Hoang Thanh-Tung and Truyen Tran. On Catastrophic Forgetting and Mode Collapse in Generative Adversarial Networks, March 2020. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1807.04015. arXiv :1807.04015 [cs, stat]

    2020 arXiv

  79. [88]

    Fleet, and Mohammad Norouzi

    Chitwan Saharia, Jonathan Ho, William Chan, Tim Salimans, David J. Fleet, and Mohammad Norouzi. Image Super-Resolution via Iterative Refinement, June 2021. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.07636

    2021 arXiv

  80. [89]

    Cold diffusion model for seismic denoising

    Daniele Trappolini, Laura Laurenti, Giulio Poggiali, Elisa Tinti, Fabio Galasso, Alberto Michelini, and Chris Marone. Cold diffusion model for seismic denoising. Journal of Geophysical Research : Machine Learning and Computation, 1(2) :e2024JH000179, June 2024. ISSN 2993-5210,...

    2024 doi

  81. [90]

    URL https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/bssa/article/111/5/ 2358/605736/NESS2-0-An-Updated-Version-of-the-Worldwide

    doi : 10.1785/0120210080. URL https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/bssa/article/111/5/ 2358/605736/NESS2-0-An-Updated-Version-of-the-Worldwide

    doi

  82. [91]

    Comparative analysis of generative models : Enhancing image synthesis with vaes, gans, and stable diffusion

    Sanchayan Vivekananthan. Comparative analysis of generative models : Enhancing image synthesis with vaes, gans, and stable diffusion. (arXiv :2408.08751), August 2024. doi : 10.48550/arXiv.2408.08751. URL http: //arxiv.org/abs/2408.08751. arXiv :2408.08751 [cs]

    2024 doi arXiv

  83. [92]

    Dynamic rupture mo- deling of large earthquake scenarios at the Hellenic Arc toward physics-based seismic and tsunami hazard assessment

    Sara Aniko Wirp, Alice-Agnes Gabriel, Thomas Ulrich, and Stefano Lorito. Dynamic rupture mo- deling of large earthquake scenarios at the Hellenic Arc toward physics-based seismic and tsunami hazard assessment. Journal of Geophysical Research : Solid Earth , 129(11) :1–36, 2024...

    2024

  84. [93]

    Smerzini, M

    C. Smerzini, M. Vanini, R. Paolucci, P. Renault, and P. Traversa. Regional physics-based simulation of ground motion within the Rh ˆone Valley, France, during the MW 4.9 2019 Le Teil earthquake. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 21(4) :1747–1774, March 2023. ISSN 1570-761X, ...

    2019 doi

  85. [94]

    WaveGAN : Frequency-Aware GAN for High-Fidelity Few-Shot Image Generation , volume 13675 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science , pages 1–17

    Mengping Yang, Zhe Wang, Ziqiu Chi, and Wenyi Feng. WaveGAN : Frequency-Aware GAN for High-Fidelity Few-Shot Image Generation , volume 13675 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science , pages 1–17. Springer 23 A preprint - 25 avril 2025 Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2022. ISBN 978-3-031...

    2025 doi

  86. [95]

    Wavelet knowledge distillation : Towards efficient image-to-image translation, 2022

    Linfeng Zhang, Xin Chen, Xiaobing Tu, Pengfei Wan, Ning Xu, and Kaisheng Ma. Wavelet knowledge distillation : Towards efficient image-to-image translation, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.06321

    2022 arXiv

  87. [96]

    Mostafa Mousavi, and Gregory C

    Weiqiang Zhu, S. Mostafa Mousavi, and Gregory C. Beroza. Chapter four - seismic signal augmentation to improve generalization of deep neural networks. In Ben Moseley and Lion Krischer, editors, Machine Learning in Geosciences , volume 61 of Advances in Geophysics , pages 151–1...

    2020 doi

  88. [97]

    X. Zhu, H. Wang, and Y. Liu. Bayesian seismic source inversion with a 3-d earth model of the earth’s crust. Journal of Geophysical Research : Solid Earth , 127(4) :e2022JB024231, 2022. doi : 10.1029/2022JB024231. URL https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2022JB024231

    2022 doi

  89. [98]

    Sem3d : A 3d high-fidelity numerical earthquake simulator for broadband (0–10 hz) seismic response prediction at a regional scale

    Sara Touhami, Filippo Gatti, Fernando Lopez-Caballero, R ´egis Cottereau, L´ ucio de Abreu Corr ˆea, Ludovic Aubry, and Didier Clouteau. Sem3d : A 3d high-fidelity numerical earthquake simulator for broadband (0–10 hz) seismic response prediction at a regional scale. Geoscienc...

    2022 doi

  90. [100]

    Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin

    Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need, February 2023. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762

    2023 arXiv

  91. [103]

    A comparison of select trigger algorithms for automated global seismic phase and event detection

    Mitchell Withers, Richard Aster, Christopher Young, Judy Beiriger, Mark Harris, Susan Moore, and Julian Trujillo. A comparison of select trigger algorithms for automated global seismic phase and event detection. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 88(1) :95–106, 1998

    1998

  92. [108]

    Zuchowski, M

    L. Zuchowski, M. Brun, and F. De Martin. Co-simulation coupling spectral/finite elements for 3D soil/structure interaction problems. Comptes Rendus M´ecanique, 346(5) :408–422, May 2018. ISSN 16310721. doi : 10.1016/ j.crme.2018.02.001. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retr...

    2018

  93. [571]

    URL https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10339272/

    doi : 10.1109/LGRS.2023.3338652. URL https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10339272/

    2023

  94. [2010]

    doi : 10.1785/0120090052

    ISSN 0037-1106. doi : 10.1785/0120090052. URL https://doi.org/10.1785/0120090052. doi : 10.1785/0120090052

    doi

  95. [2020]

    doi : 10.1016/j.cma.2020.113421

    ISSN 0045-7825. doi : 10.1016/j.cma.2020.113421. URLhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S004578252030606X

    2020

  96. [2021]

    doi : 10.1093/gji/ggab225

    ISSN 0956-540X, 1365-246X. doi : 10.1093/gji/ggab225. URL https://academic.oup.com/gji/ article/227/1/333/6295311. 21 A preprint - 25 avril 2025

    2025 doi

  97. [2024]

    Curran Associates Inc

  98. [2025]

    URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.14348

    doi : 10.48550/arXiv.2501.14348. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.14348. arXiv :2501.14348 [physics]

    doi arXiv

  99. [3573]

    URL https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/bssa/article/112/4/ 1979/613199/Data-Driven-Synthesis-of-Broadband-Earthquake

    doi : 10.1785/0120210264. URL https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/bssa/article/112/4/ 1979/613199/Data-Driven-Synthesis-of-Broadband-Earthquake

    1979 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.