Pith. sign in

Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk

As of 11 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 38 of 38 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2507.08150.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2507.08150 v4

Coverage vector

measured 38 of 38 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:48.564548Z

measured 40 of 40 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00

measured 2 of 2 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-05-16T07:32:23.756013Z

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-05-16T07:32:23.790928Z

Reference resolution

38 of 38 outbound references displayed

  • verified exact2
  • verified fuzzy19
  • unresolved16
  • parse uncertain0
  • malformed identifier1
  • metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation 3c3cceea-6ac0-4872-a067-ae43e9524d12 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk Unresolved cited work

Reference 1

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:49.182090Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.513165Z digest=sha256:41504c31eeff25fa2c2578b8a95dc7c04b6b5f61c486ae87b4af421855e4bbdb

Observation eeb277d4-f725-4c8c-b441-00ed6621a78c · outbound

This paper cites However, our empirical results in Tables 14, 19 and 24 show that for reasonably sized datasets, this theoretical discrepancy does not visibly impact our practical marginal coverage.

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk However, our empirical results in Tables 14, 19 and 24 show that for reasonably sized datasets, this theoretical discrepancy does not visibly impact our practical marginal coverage

Reference 2

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:49.174339Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.515458Z digest=sha256:c49b4dede9ababa008f727e4d68087f231a3784962c939945884c4478d8a6a38

Observation 168b4c4f-6725-4bb7-bfd7-8559fc02f4d5 · outbound

This paper cites If ⌈(1 − α)(|Dcal| + 1)⌉ > |Dcal|, set γ∗ 1 = ∞.

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk If ⌈(1 − α)(|Dcal| + 1)⌉ > |Dcal|, set γ∗ 1 = ∞

Reference 3

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:49.150641Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.522145Z digest=sha256:9905227d9426d2afdf07fd57bae134b79fc2c92f7ded4bdb960ed44af45d7cc6

Observation 1f2d3995-4d47-46ce-b4f1-3dbfebc0cf35 · outbound

This paper cites Lemma B.2.

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk Lemma B.2

Reference 4

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:49.142990Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.524089Z digest=sha256:b8c5dfc6af66a2181fea2c66251a0083d7756e0cb0a756e83abce8ab14722f47

Observation 80403ed9-5352-4d18-b6c6-5ee94b101193 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk Unresolved cited work

Reference 6

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:49.205628Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.485884Z digest=sha256:cf74a5059c973ac8c719e9d7a10f07ade80167f7e6ccc82b34ec08330e57b2fe

Observation a6943fd8-b4fe-4d1b-9e01-9bc8ba969584 · outbound

This paper cites URL https://www.nature.com/articles/ s41586-024-08328-6.

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk URL https://www.nature.com/articles/ s41586-024-08328-6

Reference 7

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:48.489047Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.489047Z digest=sha256:e02a0115ed34e152368d58ae9b0fc4fa50836be87f6b7e7301e5b3cf35b0ab83

Observation 149385e2-11a3-4652-a379-d585eb9c204e · outbound

This paper cites Conformal prediction intervals for the individual treatment effect.

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk Conformal prediction intervals for the individual treatment effect

Reference 9

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:48.494169Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.494169Z digest=sha256:3eb1de3152388844d2241888f5addf68467b95604d3f7b65ccac5f14fa269b69

Observation c3f67af1-a6af-4963-aeb2-4f62d71f2bf5 · outbound

This paper cites Quantifying Aleatoric and Epistemic Dynamics Uncertainty via Local Conformal Calibration.

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk Quantifying Aleatoric and Epistemic Dynamics Uncertainty via Local Conformal Calibration

Reference 10

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:48.497158Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.497158Z digest=sha256:8f0e5be86f249acc55e3338b57859e385eb279544ef1c5c5c03c57591f8294b5

Observation 14694edb-7ab5-4529-9dd8-2712a384b38f · outbound

This paper cites A Deeper Look into Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty Disentanglement.

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk A Deeper Look into Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty Disentanglement

Reference 12

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:48.502755Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.502755Z digest=sha256:f0d295db68e37747f33913dfd504ccf27c328ae6af4d66b96023e42bb80d0b31

Observation abd9a55e-e8ff-4eca-9526-4a60e0df7ac0 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk Unresolved cited work

Reference 13

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:48.505544Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.505544Z digest=sha256:322943e68a6c9b9327f0fb11781e1f57d5b6cf1f1a2a16faa5595b08e6812195

Observation 625bec00-76da-4862-9af4-3cc55ce702d3 · outbound

This paper cites B EYOND PINBALL LOSS : QUANTILE METHODS FOR CALIBRATED UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION.

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk B EYOND PINBALL LOSS : QUANTILE METHODS FOR CALIBRATED UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION

Reference 15

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:49.189946Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.510672Z digest=sha256:3bb09cb305e2a37ac3cf9feddb9229ce58e7e277e0e7678558361e3618917b8b

Observation b245d876-aa77-4788-ba23-05b0c4f97980 · outbound

This paper cites The optimal value λ∗ is found by optimizing the QuantileLoss on Dval, without using any data from Dcal (Step 4 and 5 of Algorithm 1).

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk The optimal value λ∗ is found by optimizing the QuantileLoss on Dval, without using any data from Dcal (Step 4 and 5 of Algorithm 1)

Reference 18

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:49.166734Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.517900Z digest=sha256:6f5b6e92857457013e51988209946c0bfcc4a27f46181e86a428297e1a7ff1da

Observation 681a8ed2-a4c0-4b5c-a371-50f3cb1587df · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk Unresolved cited work

Reference 19

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:49.158196Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.519995Z digest=sha256:a9e7c2e8eb2e8a152277bc1566c159fb9aa14cccec8b74ed731410e9327f7cb3

Observation d8e2e00b-8d2b-439d-984d-1437702741f6 · outbound

This paper cites If the calibration residuals are small by chance, conformal intervals may be too narrow, especially with tiny calibration datasets.

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk If the calibration residuals are small by chance, conformal intervals may be too narrow, especially with tiny calibration datasets

Reference 22

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:49.134738Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.526305Z digest=sha256:aef52f7cffa4422b1c3089a0eaa49568d0f91eb0840fa4560ac297e259989baf

Observation da32b5e5-2ffb-4207-8e35-7243d77f65a5 · outbound

This paper cites This is crucial in human-in-the-loop settings, where interventions are prioritized based on an accurate ranking of predictive uncertainty across data points (see Appendix I).

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk This is crucial in human-in-the-loop settings, where interventions are prioritized based on an accurate ranking of predictive uncertainty across data points (see Appendix I)

Reference 23

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:49.126971Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.528523Z digest=sha256:74a17dce50a20cc2af3f869260c37490d949157aabe68cab0231c8c30f78f6c4

Observation 9b2042a0-4fa0-4f5f-8de4-023168ac10b4 · outbound

This paper cites Similarly, classical Random Forests are known to be consistent under standard assumptions (Scornet et al., 2015).

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk Similarly, classical Random Forests are known to be consistent under standard assumptions (Scornet et al., 2015)

Reference 24

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:49.117690Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.531388Z digest=sha256:63127801289f1e46b46b7d7deb0c6b85936e9d30e6de0eab8eefbf3b13062658

Observation 86aa540b-6855-44de-a93e-9868cb916ada · outbound

This paper cites This suggests that XGBoost and its quantile version, QXGB, can be consistent for suitable choices of hyperparameters.

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk This suggests that XGBoost and its quantile version, QXGB, can be consistent for suitable choices of hyperparameters

Reference 25

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:49.109699Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.533586Z digest=sha256:26b6e45d1c5ed443515182b5a81a868e8bd865047b0899704148adf7ce2a1835

Observation 5a6376b9-9c39-415d-982f-844fe483edfd · outbound

This paper cites pinball loss.

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk pinball loss

Reference 26

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:49.101693Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.535627Z digest=sha256:70744a2035f591431989736b9fa88fa77af0161f1747703ab6a51f18ec91f57a

Observation 60b70e60-3e41-40dc-9af0-2e8e8d71c1ad · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk Unresolved cited work

Reference 27

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:49.094176Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.538377Z digest=sha256:162d83f2edcddc51c4c20b3ddbd3072a842a9147c80f4a7ec6014e0720fb4af5

Observation 53d3d7ea-3108-4d89-8bf5-070ec9e36c8c · outbound

This paper cites In other words, Step 3 and 4 of Algorithm 1 together (approximately) solve (γ⋆ 1 , λ⋆) = arg min (γ1,λ)∈(0,∞)×Λ s.t.

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk In other words, Step 3 and 4 of Algorithm 1 together (approximately) solve (γ⋆ 1 , λ⋆) = arg min (γ1,λ)∈(0,∞)×Λ s.t

Reference 28

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:49.086974Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.540944Z digest=sha256:8cf1b2e50efc20665ec4ec7e59f96e38ebe65bf19ebf155769a6c5e421fb879a

Observation d69fece6-1c06-48ad-afa6-8e76e5353298 · outbound

This paper cites P[Y | X].

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk P[Y | X]

Reference 29

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:49.078629Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.543124Z digest=sha256:59837697eae93302a286e404cb2be619dbc8bc9986e2a4f52a7e3742a4e6dff8

Observation c060317b-6b7a-48f4-9e4e-d92abf1b17fd · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk Unresolved cited work

Reference 30

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:49.070821Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.545684Z digest=sha256:cc95209b57cb49313cf14b2ddd39fe31fa95c6d381b3ba71a2085b92a787444c

Observation e37ac8c9-8381-4548-a533-4cad3cbca941 · outbound

This paper cites E.g., λ0 = 0 for methods that do not explicitly model epistemic uncertainty (see Ap- pendix A.6), or λ0 = 1 for methods that model both but do not rebalance them (see Appendix A.2).

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk E.g., λ0 = 0 for methods that do not explicitly model epistemic uncertainty (see Ap- pendix A.6), or λ0 = 1 for methods that model both but do not rebalance them (see Appendix A.2)

Reference 31

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:49.062967Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.547788Z digest=sha256:a54d457b67d7b71558a2cd92c90fbcc2463f041d9f082812ff14c07c4cf96db8

Observation e27baace-0dbe-46dd-a36f-f34c73af66dd · outbound

This paper cites It outputs Cγ1,0,γ2,base.

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk It outputs Cγ1,0,γ2,base

Reference 32

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:49.055024Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.549945Z digest=sha256:8086002bc90945aab6166ded4ea28448fcb01e875629d289d2157413f37825dd

Observation 8039f8d7-7cfc-4651-a100-e32b7ea52fe5 · outbound

This paper cites On the calibration set, absolute residuals ai = |yi − ˆf (xi)| are computed.

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk On the calibration set, absolute residuals ai = |yi − ˆf (xi)| are computed

Reference 33

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:49.047688Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.552247Z digest=sha256:7a5b37564a620dc66613818d9c57df5b4d60caafff2f45881110c1467f0542a7

Observation d16f9084-c37c-48eb-86d9-d0ae8e5e1124 · outbound

This paper cites This implies γ1 = γ2.

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk This implies γ1 = γ2

Reference 34

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:49.040042Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.554443Z digest=sha256:be943849822d468e67f478920aa0ae582a645878b36bfc6734a54fbbb5833508

Observation 6ff5d728-aaee-4d12-9df8-e8059398f096 · outbound

This paper cites With γ1 = 1, then γ2 = λ and the prediction interval from Equation (3) reads as: Cγ1=1(x) = h ˆf (x) − ˆqale α/2(x) − λˆqepi α/2(x), ˆf (x) + ˆqale 1−α/2(x) + λˆqepi 1−α/2(x) i.

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk With γ1 = 1, then γ2 = λ and the prediction interval from Equation (3) reads as: Cγ1=1(x) = h ˆf (x) − ˆqale α/2(x) − λˆqepi α/2(x), ˆf (x) + ˆqale 1−α/2(x) + λˆqepi 1−α/2(x) i

Reference 35

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:49.032616Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.556546Z digest=sha256:64585fb9229aaff41250d97bc1aa878a54eb99d8e19422a55ffd521d3dd34c35

Observation b74b4fb1-ff36-4c3e-a922-0df9425a6cd1 · outbound

This paper cites relative vs. absolute uncertainty.

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk relative vs. absolute uncertainty

Reference 36

Resolution
malformed identifier
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:48.655347Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.558697Z digest=sha256:2440d5fd9cdcf2d4282ac9fd5211bd51dcf4755b81185c50693ab858d10bdc8e

Observation 3ba588ea-4f27-40ef-88cb-6d024d610606 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk Unresolved cited work

Reference 37

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:49.024472Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.562454Z digest=sha256:3a410a87a0e4a5ec52ab43af1b4a2cdb09d1816f9239a552f1c6c8968f916d90

Observation 04923d9c-3f27-4163-bf33-645cb8a58fce · outbound

This paper cites Even when conditional coverage is not required, improving relative uncertainty tends to reduce average interval width and improve marginal calibration under distribution shifts.

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk Even when conditional coverage is not required, improving relative uncertainty tends to reduce average interval width and improve marginal calibration under distribution shifts

Reference 38

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:49.016514Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.564548Z digest=sha256:f82be9f56899c7e6a2d9b14169fadfe233706880228d2960ca2ae184e8340c57

Observation 2b0d8c99-df3c-4d56-9b0d-0391c60fea96 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk Unresolved cited work

Reference 1968

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:48.482590Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.482590Z digest=sha256:2bde6953c50fe4da05e5f458f025e4bbba31243ac2e4be80814c502e42ce186e

Observation 459d14f0-ec22-4974-a1bd-cb3d05ed6681 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk Unresolved cited work

Reference 2006

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:48.500075Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.500075Z digest=sha256:43ab770a97745b9117f7bb414dbd20b55f483d93ae5c6a4b47311d6d5a0fe009

Observation 3bbad276-91ef-4bd5-aef2-a4e8ab44f46e · outbound

This paper cites What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?.

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?

Reference 2017

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:48.491470Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.491470Z digest=sha256:c212747c7bf6f9f8a4620c78962b4e1b261febe8c393468453819e4683fcf5c6

Observation 9f8e86c0-7d56-4258-b921-eaf0d0d4756a · outbound

This paper cites ambiguity in targets y for a given x.

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk ambiguity in targets y for a given x

Reference 2019

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:49.198334Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.508126Z digest=sha256:291ab183f78bb4d075218ab43549b5c5cacc5ad809f0e5c396c0e16e64be3369

Observation 66820df5-9a34-4b2f-8ea2-791355a58698 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk Unresolved cited work

Reference 2020

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:49.213529Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.474318Z digest=sha256:0ddff1b9528436a499a0b7206a1364ef3bb7756ffee917900729f5de837d4679

Observation 555d5fff-ecef-4f4d-818b-8c1d2d31de63 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk Unresolved cited work

Reference 2021

Resolution
verified exact
doi, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:48.586855Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.479799Z digest=sha256:cb66eba831dbc0cefd5ab8949cca2258d2dc7e79f76af41ad3b36698907db2b3

Observation ee84778e-bdfd-489b-ab97-78b3386d4e53 · outbound

This paper cites Theoretical Foundations of Conformal Prediction.

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk Theoretical Foundations of Conformal Prediction

Reference 2024

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:48.476730Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.476730Z digest=sha256:fbc4385511f50a26f5d8aba2ec6819a8e3cb7b4d358708b6bc476266ced99ec8

Observation a4eb5e3e-3410-4aa0-b1ce-80ba0fd80726 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk Unresolved cited work

Reference 2025

Resolution
verified exact
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:34:49.007397Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T18:34:48.471494Z digest=sha256:b21d70b337e2db99dddeb4527050bbbdd7dba63b65225ec0bdcdf05a214468ca

Pith citing papers

Observation 374e3be3-fd8f-4cc1-9287-c04ab28c4c6f · inbound

Theoretical Foundations of Conformal Prediction cites this paper.

Theoretical Foundations of Conformal Prediction CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk

Reference 8

Resolution
verified exact
arxiv_id, observed 2026-07-07T03:18:08.792596Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-05-16T07:32:23.756013Z digest=sha256:489ac813a2b54ed35071e2a0627c606e06878b445acfeaf4d15c162b9522ba94

Observation 13395141-9b5f-45a3-8b0c-9c715c3190fb · inbound

Calibrate, Don't Curate: Label-Efficient Estimation from Noisy LLM Judges cites this paper.

Calibrate, Don't Curate: Label-Efficient Estimation from Noisy LLM Judges CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk

Reference 2

Resolution
verified exact
arxiv_id, observed 2026-07-07T03:18:08.792596Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-05-12T03:27:21.060953Z digest=sha256:b0121bf35331af5adbffc695b87df04dfd9e3a151ab055a216842ce6628dba64