pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.22133 · v1 · pith:EKDFRC4Rnew · submitted 2026-06-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Field-tunable quadruple-Q states driven by momentum-space frustration

S. Hayami This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 11:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords quadruple-Q magnetismmomentum-space frustrationitinerant magnetsspin crystalssquare latticemagnetic field tuningbiquadratic interactionnoncoplanar textures
0
0 comments X

The pith

Momentum-space frustration and biquadratic coupling stabilize multiple distinct quadruple-Q spin states in a square-lattice model under an applied field.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines a minimal spin model on the square lattice involving four symmetry-equivalent wave vectors and both bilinear and biquadratic interactions in the presence of an out-of-plane field. It uses numerical methods to map out the field-dependent phases, revealing transitions from single-Q to double-Q to various quadruple-Q states that differ in their phase relations, amplitudes, and chirality. This shows that frustration in momentum space, together with higher-order couplings, can generate a rich variety of complex spin textures without needing real-space frustration or noncentrosymmetry. A sympathetic reader would care because such textures can host topological properties or unusual transport in itinerant magnets.

Core claim

In a minimal momentum-space spin Hamiltonian on the square lattice with interactions restricted to four symmetry-related ordering wave vectors, the combination of bilinear and biquadratic terms under an out-of-plane magnetic field produces successive transitions among single-Q, double-Q, and multiple inequivalent quadruple-Q states. These quadruple-Q states share the same wave vectors but differ in phase locking, amplitude distribution, and noncoplanarity, which in turn generate distinct real-space spin textures and scalar spin chirality patterns.

What carries the argument

Minimal momentum-space spin Hamiltonian with bilinear and biquadratic interactions on four symmetry-related wave vectors.

If this is right

  • Different phase lockings among the quadruple-Q states produce distinct noncoplanar textures and scalar spin chirality patterns.
  • Field strength acts as a tuning parameter that drives transitions between single-Q, double-Q, and inequivalent quadruple-Q states.
  • Biquadratic interactions are required to stabilize the quadruple-Q manifold beyond what bilinear terms alone can achieve.
  • The same wave-vector set can host multiple quadruple-Q states with qualitatively different real-space properties.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same momentum-frustration mechanism could be tested on other lattices with four-fold symmetric nesting vectors.
  • Transport signatures such as topological Hall resistivity might distinguish the inequivalent quadruple-Q states in experiment.
  • Generalizing the model to include longer-range interactions could further enrich the phase diagram while preserving the quadruple-Q route.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen minimal momentum-space spin Hamiltonian with only bilinear and biquadratic interactions on four symmetry-related wave vectors sufficiently captures the essential physics of real itinerant electron systems on the square lattice.

What would settle it

A material expected to realize the model that shows only single-Q or double-Q order across the full field range, with no quadruple-Q states detected by neutron scattering or other probes, would falsify the stabilization mechanism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.22133 by S. Hayami.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (Colour online) The four ordering wave vectors 𝑸1–𝑸4 are illustrated in the Brillouin zone. They are generated by applying successive fourfold rotational and/or mirror operations to a representative wave vector. The presence of these four competing modes provides a natural basis for stabilizing not only single-𝑄 and double-𝑄 states but also a variety of unconventional quadruple-𝑄 superpositions. Such a rec… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (Colour online) Magnetic phase diagram obtained for the spin model defined in equation (2.1) in the low-temperature limit. The diagram is plotted in the parameter space spanned by the biquadratic interaction 𝐾, along the horizontal axis, and the applied magnetic field 𝐻 along the vertical axis. We fix the remaining parameter to 𝐽 = 1. The labels 1𝑄, 2𝑄, and 4𝑄 denote the single-𝑄 ordered phase, the double-… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: summarizes representative real-space spin configurations stabilized at 𝐾 = 0.12. At low magnetic field (𝐻 = 0.1), the ground state is identified as the double-𝑄 I phase [figure 3(a)], characterized by the coexistence of two symmetry-related modulation vectors. The resulting spin texture exhibits an interference pattern distinct from a simple helical spiral, and already reflects the underlying momentum￾spac… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (Colour online) Representative real-space patterns of the scalar spin chirality, obtained from simulated annealing calculations at 𝐾 = 0.12, are displayed. The data are for the double-𝑄 I (2𝑄 I) state at 𝐻 = 0.1. The corresponding scalar spin chirality distribution in the double-𝑄 I phase is shown in figure 4. Whereas the spin texture is noncoplanar, the scalar spin chirality does not form a uniform skyrmi… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (Colour online) Momentum-space profiles of the spin structure factor are summarized by plotting √ 𝑆 𝑥𝑦 𝑠 (𝒒) and √ 𝑆 𝑧 𝑠 (𝒒) for the phases in figure 3. The results are shown for (a) the double-𝑄 I (2𝑄 I) state at 𝐻 = 0.1, (b) the single-𝑄 (1𝑄) state at 𝐻 = 1, and (c) the quadruple-𝑄 I (4𝑄 I) state at 𝐻 = 1.9. In each case, the in-plane component appears in the left-hand panel, whereas the out-of-plane con… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (Colour online) Magnetic-field evolution of (a) the magnetization and (b) the squared magnetic moments (𝑚𝑸𝜈 ) 2 at 𝐾 = 0.12. Vertical dashed lines indicate the phase transition points separating different magnetic states. 3.3. Intermediate biquadratic coupling regime We next consider an intermediate coupling strength, 𝐾 = 0.4, where the biquadratic interaction becomes sufficiently strong to compete with th… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (Colour online) Representative real-space spin textures obtained by simulated annealing at 𝐾 = 0.4 are displayed. Panel (a) shows the quadruple-𝑄 II (4𝑄 II) state at 𝐻 = 0.1, panel (b) corresponds to the quadruple-𝑄 III (4𝑄 III) state at 𝐻 = 0.6, and panel (c) represents the double-𝑄 II (2𝑄 II) state at 𝐻 = 1. Spin orientations are indicated by arrows, and the color scale represents the out-of-plane compon… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (Colour online) Representative real-space patterns of the scalar spin chirality, obtained from simulated annealing calculations at 𝐾 = 0.4, are displayed. Panel (a) shows the quadruple-𝑄 II (4𝑄 II) state at 𝐻 = 0.1, panel (b) corresponds to the quadruple-𝑄 III (4𝑄 III) state at 𝐻 = 0.6, and panel (c) represents the double-𝑄 II (2𝑄 II) state at 𝐻 = 1. The evolution of noncoplanarity is further clarified by … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (Colour online) Momentum-space profiles of the spin structure factor are summarized by plotting √ 𝑆 𝑥𝑦 𝑠 (𝒒) and √ 𝑆 𝑧 𝑠 (𝒒) for the phases in figure 7. The results are shown for (a) the quadruple-𝑄 II (4𝑄 II) state at 𝐻 = 0.1, (b) the quadruple-𝑄 III (4𝑄 III) state at 𝐻 = 1, and (c) the double-𝑄 II (2𝑄 II) state at 𝐻 = 1.9. In each case, the in-plane component appears in the left-hand panel, whereas the o… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (Colour online) Magnetic-field evolution of (a) the magnetization and (b) the squared magnetic moments (𝑚𝑸𝜈 ) 2 at 𝐾 = 0.4. Vertical dashed lines indicate the phase transition points separating different magnetic states. Thus, the intermediate-𝐾 regime illustrates that biquadratic interactions can stabilize a hierarchy of quadruple-𝑄 spin crystals, where some phase boundaries are characterized by smooth d… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: (Colour online) Representative real-space spin textures obtained by simulated annealing at 𝐾 = 0.6 are displayed. Panel (a) shows the quadruple-𝑄 IV (4𝑄 IV) state at 𝐻 = 1 and panel (b) corresponds to the quadruple-𝑄 V (4𝑄 V) state at 𝐻 = 1.5. Spin orientations are indicated by arrows, and the color scale represents the out-of-plane component 𝑆 𝑧 𝑖 . Upon increasing the magnetic field to 𝐻 = 1.5, the syst… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: (Colour online) Representative real-space patterns of the scalar spin chirality, obtained from simulated annealing calculations at 𝐾 = 0.6, are displayed. Panel (a) shows the quadruple-𝑄 IV (4𝑄 IV) state at 𝐻 = 1 and panel (b) corresponds to the quadruple-𝑄 V (4𝑄 V) state at 𝐻 = 1.5. The noncoplanar character of these phases is further reflected in the scalar spin chirality landscapes. As shown in figures… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: (Colour online) Momentum-space profiles of the spin structure factor are summarized by plotting √ 𝑆 𝑥𝑦 𝑠 (𝒒) and √ 𝑆 𝑧 𝑠 (𝒒) for the phases in figure 11. The results are shown for (a) the quadruple-𝑄 IV (4𝑄 IV) state at 𝐻 = 1 and (b) the quadruple-𝑄 V (4𝑄 V) state at 𝐻 = 1.5. In each case, the in-plane component appears in the left-hand panel, whereas the out-of-plane contribution is presented in the righ… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: (Colour online) Magnetic-field evolution of (a) the magnetization and (b) the squared magnetic moments (𝑚𝑸𝜈 ) 2 at 𝐾 = 0.6. Vertical dashed lines indicate the phase transition points separating different magnetic states. 3.5. Very strong biquadratic coupling regime Finally, we examine the very strong biquadratic coupling regime at 𝐾 = 0.76, which represents the case where quartic interactions overwhelming… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: (Colour online) Representative real-space spin textures obtained by simulated annealing at 𝐾 = 0.76 are displayed. Panel (a) shows the quadruple-𝑄 III (4𝑄 III) state at 𝐻 = 0.1 and panel (b) corresponds to the quadruple-𝑄 I (4𝑄 I) state at 𝐻 = 1. Spin orientations are indicated by arrows, and the color scale represents the out-of-plane component 𝑆 𝑧 𝑖 . Representative real-space spin configurations obtain… view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: (Colour online) Representative real-space patterns of the scalar spin chirality, obtained from simulated annealing calculations at 𝐾 = 0.76, are displayed. Panel (a) shows the quadruple-𝑄 III (4𝑄 III) state at 𝐻 = 0.1 and panel (b) corresponds to the quadruple-𝑄 I (4𝑄 I) state at 𝐻 = 1. Momentum-space fingerprints of the very strong-𝐾 regime are summarized in figure 17. In the quadruple-𝑄 III phase, the s… view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: figure 18. The magnetization increases steadily with field, yet the quadruple- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: (Colour online) Momentum-space profiles of the spin structure factor are summarized by plotting √ 𝑆 𝑥𝑦 𝑠 (𝒒) and √ 𝑆 𝑧 𝑠 (𝒒) for the phases in figure 15. The results are shown for (a) the quadruple-𝑄 III (4𝑄 III) state at 𝐻 = 0.1 and (b) the quadruple-𝑄 I (4𝑄 I) state at 𝐻 = 1. In each case, the in-plane component appears in the left-hand panel, whereas the out-of-plane contribution is presented in the ri… view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: (Colour online) Magnetic-field evolution of (a) the magnetization and (b) the squared magnetic moments (𝑚𝑸𝜈 ) 2 at 𝐾 = 0.76. Vertical dashed lines indicate the phase transition points separating different magnetic states. 23705-16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_18.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Multiple-$Q$ magnetism in itinerant electron systems enables complex spin crystals and noncoplanar textures even in centrosymmetric settings. We study a minimal momentum-space spin model on a square lattice with four symmetry-related ordering wave vectors, including bilinear and biquadratic interactions under an out-of-plane magnetic field. Using simulated annealing, we obtain the field-dependent phase diagram and identify successive transitions among single-$Q$, double-$Q$, and multiple inequivalent quadruple-$Q$ states. The quadruple-$Q$ manifold exhibits rich internal structures: the states sharing the same wave vectors differ in phase locking, amplitude distribution, and noncoplanarity, leading to distinct real-space textures and scalar spin chirality patterns. Our results demonstrate that momentum-space frustration and biquadratic coupling provide an efficient route to stabilizing diverse quadruple-$Q$ spin crystals, offering a general framework for higher-order spin textures in centrosymmetric itinerant magnets.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims that a minimal momentum-space spin model on the square lattice with four symmetry-related ordering wave vectors, incorporating bilinear and biquadratic interactions under an out-of-plane magnetic field, yields a field-dependent phase diagram with successive transitions among single-Q, double-Q, and multiple inequivalent quadruple-Q states. Using simulated annealing, the authors identify rich internal structures within the quadruple-Q manifold, differing in phase locking, amplitude distribution, and noncoplanarity, which produce distinct real-space textures and scalar spin chirality patterns. The results are presented as demonstrating that momentum-space frustration and biquadratic coupling provide an efficient route to stabilizing diverse quadruple-Q spin crystals, offering a general framework for higher-order spin textures in centrosymmetric itinerant magnets.

Significance. If the numerical results hold, this work offers a concrete phenomenological demonstration that biquadratic terms combined with momentum-space frustration on symmetry-related wave vectors can generate a variety of quadruple-Q states with tunable properties, which is of interest to the study of complex magnetism in centrosymmetric itinerant systems. It could serve as a useful minimal model for exploring higher-order spin textures, potentially guiding material searches, though its broader applicability depends on establishing connections to microscopic electronic models.

major comments (2)
  1. [Introduction / Model Hamiltonian] The Hamiltonian (bilinear + biquadratic terms on four symmetry-related Q vectors) is introduced as a minimal model without derivation from an underlying itinerant-electron Hamiltonian (e.g., RKKY expansion of a Hubbard or Kondo-lattice model on the square lattice). This is load-bearing for the abstract's claim that the results offer 'a general framework for higher-order spin textures in centrosymmetric itinerant magnets', as it is unclear whether the biquadratic interactions and momentum-space frustration arise naturally or require external parameter tuning.
  2. [Methods / Numerical simulations] No details are provided on system sizes, annealing protocols, number of independent runs, or convergence checks for the simulated annealing used to construct the phase diagram and identify the quadruple-Q states. This is load-bearing for the central results, as the identification of multiple inequivalent quadruple-Q states with distinct internal structures relies on the reliability of these numerics.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions to improve the presentation of the model and the numerical methods.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Introduction / Model Hamiltonian] The Hamiltonian (bilinear + biquadratic terms on four symmetry-related Q vectors) is introduced as a minimal model without derivation from an underlying itinerant-electron Hamiltonian (e.g., RKKY expansion of a Hubbard or Kondo-lattice model on the square lattice). This is load-bearing for the abstract's claim that the results offer 'a general framework for higher-order spin textures in centrosymmetric itinerant magnets', as it is unclear whether the biquadratic interactions and momentum-space frustration arise naturally or require external parameter tuning.

    Authors: The Hamiltonian is presented as a minimal phenomenological model chosen to isolate the effects of momentum-space frustration among four symmetry-related wave vectors together with biquadratic interactions. While we do not perform an explicit microscopic derivation (e.g., via RKKY expansion of a Hubbard or Kondo-lattice model) in this work, the form is motivated by effective spin interactions known to appear in itinerant magnets. The abstract's reference to a 'general framework' concerns the demonstration that these ingredients suffice to produce the reported sequence of quadruple-Q states and their internal structures, rather than a claim that the parameters emerge without tuning in every material. To clarify this distinction, we will add a short paragraph in the introduction discussing the phenomenological character of the model and referencing related microscopic studies of multiple-Q states. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods / Numerical simulations] No details are provided on system sizes, annealing protocols, number of independent runs, or convergence checks for the simulated annealing used to construct the phase diagram and identify the quadruple-Q states. This is load-bearing for the central results, as the identification of multiple inequivalent quadruple-Q states with distinct internal structures relies on the reliability of these numerics.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of these technical details is an important omission. In the revised manuscript we will insert a dedicated subsection (or expand the existing Methods section) that specifies the lattice sizes used (typically up to 48 imes48 sites with periodic boundaries), the annealing schedule and temperature range, the number of independent runs performed for each field value, and the convergence and state-identification criteria employed to distinguish the inequivalent quadruple-Q configurations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; results follow from direct numerical simulation of an explicitly stated phenomenological model

full rationale

The paper defines a minimal momentum-space Hamiltonian with bilinear and biquadratic interactions restricted to four symmetry-related wave vectors, then applies simulated annealing to obtain the field-dependent phase diagram and the internal structures of the quadruple-Q states. All reported states, transitions, and textures are outputs of this numerical minimization; no parameters are fitted to external data and then relabeled as predictions, no self-citations are invoked to justify uniqueness or forbid alternatives, and no ansatz is smuggled through prior work. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained within the chosen model and its numerical solution.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a minimal effective spin model whose parameters and interaction forms are introduced without derivation from a microscopic Hamiltonian; the square-lattice symmetry and the restriction to four wave vectors are taken as given.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The square lattice possesses four symmetry-related ordering wave vectors that dominate the magnetic instability.
    Invoked in the setup of the minimal momentum-space model.
  • domain assumption Bilinear and biquadratic interactions are sufficient to capture the essential energetics under an out-of-plane field.
    Stated as the interaction content of the model studied.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5682 in / 1412 out tokens · 27104 ms · 2026-06-26T11:10:34.193926+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

127 extracted references · 126 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Grüner G., Rev. Mod. Phys., 1994,66, 1–24, doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.66.1

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.66.1 1994

  2. [2]

    Baltz V., Manchon A., Tsoi M., Moriyama T., Ono T., Tserkovnyak Y., Rev. Mod. Phys., 2018,90, 015005, doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015005

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.015005 2018

  3. [3]

    Yambe R., Hayami S., Phys. Rev. B, 2022,106, 174437, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.106.174437

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.174437 2022

  4. [4]

    Bak P., Lebech B., Phys. Rev. Lett., 1978,40, 800–803, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.800

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.40.800 1978

  5. [5]

    A., Walker M

    McEwen K. A., Walker M. B., Phys. Rev. B, 1986,34, 1781–1783, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.34.1781

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.34.1781 1986

  6. [6]

    Zochowski S., McEwen K., J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 1986,54, 515–516, doi:10.1016/0304-8853(86)90688-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0304-8853(86)90688-8 1986

  7. [7]

    Phys.: Condens

    Forgan E., Rainford B., Lee S., Abell J., Bi Y., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 1990,2, No. 50, 10211, doi:10.1088/0953-8984/2/50/026

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-8984/2/50/026 1990

  8. [8]

    J., Paixão J

    Longfield M. J., Paixão J. A., Bernhoeft N., Lander G. H., Phys. Rev. B, 2002,66, 054417, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.66.054417

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.66.054417 2002

  9. [9]

    A., Detlefs C., Wilkins S

    Bernhoeft N., Paixão J. A., Detlefs C., Wilkins S. B., Javorský P., Blackburn E., Lander G. H., Phys. Rev. B, 2004,69, 174415, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.69.174415

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.69.174415 2004

  10. [10]

    T., Gardner J., J

    Stewart J., Ehlers G., Wills A., Bramwell S. T., Gardner J., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 2004,16, No. 28, L321, doi:10.1088/0953-8984/16/28/L01

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-8984/16/28/l01 2004

  11. [11]

    M., Nuttall W

    Watson D., Forgan E. M., Nuttall W. J., Stirling W. G., Fort D., Phys. Rev. B, 1996,53, 726–730, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.53.726

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.53.726 1996

  12. [12]

    B., Schweizer J., Phys

    Harris A. B., Schweizer J., Phys. Rev. B, 2006,74, 134411, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.74.134411. 23705-17 S. Hayami

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.74.134411 2006

  13. [13]

    SchweizerJ.,GivordF.,BoucherleJ.,BourdarotF.,RessoucheE.,J.Phys.:Condens.Matter,2008,20,No.13, 135204, doi:10.1088/0953-8984/20/13/135204

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-8984/20/13/135204 2008

  14. [14]

    Szabó A., Orlandi F., Manuel P., Phys. Rev. Lett., 2022,129, 247201, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.247201

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.247201 2022

  15. [15]

    Skyrme T. H. R., Nucl. Phys., 1962,31, 556–569, doi:10.1016/0029-5582(62)90775-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0029-5582(62)90775-7 1962

  16. [16]

    N., Yablonskii D

    Bogdanov A. N., Yablonskii D. A., Sov. Phys. JETP, 1989,68, 101

    1989

  17. [17]

    Bogdanov A., Hubert A., J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 1994,138, No. 3, 255–269, doi:10.1016/0304- 8853(94)90046-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0304- 1994

  18. [18]

    RößlerU.K.,BogdanovA.N.,PfleidererC.,Nature,2006,442,No.7104,797–801,doi:10.1038/nature05056

    work page doi:10.1038/nature05056 2006

  19. [19]

    M¨ uhlbauer, B

    Mühlbauer S., Binz B., Jonietz F., Pfleiderer C., Rosch A., Neubauer A., Georgii R., Böni P., Science, 2009, 323, No. 5916, 915–919, doi:10.1126/science.1166767

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1166767 2009

  20. [20]

    YiS.D.,OnodaS.,NagaosaN.,HanJ.H.,Phys.Rev.B,2009,80,054416,doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.80.054416

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.80.054416 2009

  21. [21]

    7300, 901–904, doi:10.1038/nature09124

    YuX.Z.,OnoseY.,KanazawaN.,ParkJ.H.,HanJ.H.,MatsuiY.,NagaosaN.,TokuraY.,Nature,2010,465, No. 7300, 901–904, doi:10.1038/nature09124

    work page doi:10.1038/nature09124 2010

  22. [22]

    B., Leonov A

    Butenko A. B., Leonov A. A., Rößler U. K., Bogdanov A. N., Phys. Rev. B, 2010,82, 052403, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.82.052403

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.82.052403 2010

  23. [23]

    Münzer W., Neubauer A., Adams T., Mühlbauer S., Franz C., Jonietz F., Georgii R., Böni P., Pedersen B., Schmidt M., Rosch A., Pfleiderer C., Phys. Rev. B, 2010,81, 041203, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.81.041203

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.81.041203 2010

  24. [24]

    Adams T., Mühlbauer S., Neubauer A., Münzer W., Jonietz F., Georgii R., Pedersen B., Böni P., Rosch A., Pfleiderer C., J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 2010,200, No. 3, 032001, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/200/3/032001

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/200/3/032001 2010

  25. [25]

    Yu , author N

    YuX.Z.,KanazawaN.,OnoseY.,KimotoK.,ZhangW.,IshiwataS.,MatsuiY.,TokuraY.,Nat.Mater.,2011, 10, No. 2, 106–109, doi:10.1038/nmat2916

    work page doi:10.1038/nmat2916 2011

  26. [26]

    Phys., 2011,7, No

    Heinze S., von Bergmann K., Menzel M., Brede J., Kubetzka A., Wiesendanger R., Bihlmayer G., Blügel S., Nat. Phys., 2011,7, No. 9, 713–718, doi:10.1038/nphys2045

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys2045 2011

  27. [27]

    Adams T., Mühlbauer S., Pfleiderer C., Jonietz F., Bauer A., Neubauer A., Georgii R., Böni P., Keiderling U., EverschorK.,GarstM.,RoschA.,Phys.Rev.Lett.,2011,107,217206,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.217206

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.217206 2011

  28. [28]

    Nanotechnol., 2013,8, No

    Nagaosa N., Tokura Y., Nat. Nanotechnol., 2013,8, No. 12, 899–911, doi:10.1038/nnano.2013.243

    work page doi:10.1038/nnano.2013.243 2013

  29. [29]

    Hayami S., Phys. Rev. B, 2022,105, 014408, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.105.014408

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.105.014408 2022

  30. [30]

    Dzyaloshinsky I., J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 1958,4, No. 4, 241–255, doi:10.1016/0022-3697(58)90076-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-3697(58)90076-3 1958

  31. [31]

    Moriya ,\ title title Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.120.91 journal journal Phys

    Moriya T., Phys. Rev., 1960,120, No. 1, 91, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.120.91

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.120.91 1960

  32. [32]

    H., Ong N

    Nagaosa N., Sinova J., Onoda S., MacDonald A. H., Ong N. P., Rev. Mod. Phys., 2010,82, 1539–1592, doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.82.1539

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.1539 2010

  33. [33]

    Xiao D., Chang M.-C., Niu Q., Rev. Mod. Phys., 2010,82, 1959–2007, doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.82.1959

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.1959 2010

  34. [34]

    Ohgushi K., Murakami S., Nagaosa N., Phys. Rev. B, 2000,62, R6065–R6068, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.62.R6065

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.62.r6065 2000

  35. [35]

    5513, 2573–2576, doi:10.1126/science.1058161

    Taguchi Y., Oohara Y., Yoshizawa H., Nagaosa N., Tokura Y., Science, 2001,291, No. 5513, 2573–2576, doi:10.1126/science.1058161

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1058161 2001

  36. [36]

    Tatara G., Kawamura H., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 2002,71, No. 11, 2613–2616, doi:10.1143/JPSJ.71.2613

    work page doi:10.1143/jpsj.71.2613 2002

  37. [37]

    Machida Y., Nakatsuji S., Maeno Y., Tayama T., Sakakibara T., Onoda S., Phys. Rev. Lett., 2007,98, No. 5, 057203, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.057203

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.057203 2007

  38. [38]

    Shindou R., Nagaosa N., Phys. Rev. Lett., 2001,87, 116801, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.116801

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.116801 2001

  39. [39]

    D., Phys

    Martin I., Batista C. D., Phys. Rev. Lett., 2008,101, 156402, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.156402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.156402 2008

  40. [40]

    G., Böni P., Phys

    Neubauer A., Pfleiderer C., Binz B., Rosch A., Ritz R., Niklowitz P. G., Böni P., Phys. Rev. Lett., 2009,102, 186602, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.186602

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.186602 2009

  41. [41]

    Takatsu H., Yonezawa S., Fujimoto S., Maeno Y., Phys. Rev. Lett., 2010,105, No. 13, 137201, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.137201

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.137201 2010

  42. [42]

    G., Miclea C

    Ueland B. G., Miclea C. F., Kato Y., Ayala-Valenzuela O., McDonald R. D., Okazaki R., Tobash P. H., Torrez M. A., Ronning F., Movshovich R., Fisk Z., Martin E. D. B. I., Thompson J. D., Nat. Commun., 2012, 3, 1067, doi:10.1038/ncomms2075

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms2075 2012

  43. [43]

    Hamamoto K., Ezawa M., Nagaosa N., Phys. Rev. B, 2015,92, 115417, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.92.115417

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.92.115417 2015

  44. [44]

    Nakazawa K., Bibes M., Kohno H., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 2018,87, No. 3, 033705, doi:10.7566/JPSJ.87.033705

    work page doi:10.7566/jpsj.87.033705 2018

  45. [45]

    Commun., 2018,9, No

    Tokura Y., Nagaosa N., Nat. Commun., 2018,9, No. 1, 3740, doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05759-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05759-4 2018

  46. [46]

    Hayami S., Yambe R., Phys. Rev. Res., 2021,3, 043158, doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.043158

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.043158 2021

  47. [47]

    Hayami S., Yatsushiro M., Phys. Rev. B, 2022,106, 014420, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.106.014420

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.014420 2022

  48. [48]

    Eto R., Pohle R., Mochizuki M., Phys. Rev. Lett., 2022,129, 017201, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.017201

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.017201 2022

  49. [49]

    Akagi Y., Motome Y., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 2010,79, No. 8, 083711, doi:10.1143/JPSJ.79.083711

    work page doi:10.1143/jpsj.79.083711 2010

  50. [50]

    Barros K., Kato Y., Phys. Rev. B, 2013,88, 235101, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.88.235101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.88.235101 2013

  51. [51]

    Venderbos J. W. F., Kourtis S., van den Brink J., Daghofer M., Phys. Rev. Lett., 2012,108, 126405, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.126405. 23705-18 Field-tunable quadruple-𝑄states by frustration

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.126405 2012

  52. [52]

    Jiang K., Zhang Y., Zhou S., Wang Z., Phys. Rev. Lett., 2015,114, 216402, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.216402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.216402 2015

  53. [53]

    Venderbos J. W. F., Phys. Rev. B, 2016,93, 115108, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.93.115108

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.93.115108 2016

  54. [54]

    Barros K., Venderbos J. W. F., Chern G.-W., Batista C. D., Phys. Rev. B, 2014,90, 245119, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.90.245119

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.90.245119 2014

  55. [55]

    L., Lawler M

    Ghosh S., O’Brien P., Henley C. L., Lawler M. J., Phys. Rev. B, 2016,93, 024401, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.93.024401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.93.024401 2016

  56. [56]

    Adv., 2018,4, No

    Takagi R., White J., Hayami S., Arita R., Honecker D., Rønnow H., Tokura Y., Seki S., Sci. Adv., 2018,4, No. 11, eaau3402, doi:10.1126/sciadv.aau3402

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.aau3402 2018

  57. [57]

    D., Phys

    Wang Z., Su Y., Lin S.-Z., Batista C. D., Phys. Rev. Lett., 2020,124, 207201, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.207201

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.207201 2020

  58. [58]

    Saito H., Kon F., Hidaka H., Amitsuka H., Kwanghee C., Hagihala M., Kamiyama T., Itoh S., Nakajima T., Phys. Rev. B, 2023,108, 094440, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.108.094440

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.108.094440 2023

  59. [59]

    A., Kittel C., Phys

    Ruderman M. A., Kittel C., Phys. Rev., 1954,96, 99–102, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.96.99

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.96.99 1954

  60. [60]

    Kasuya T., Prog. Theor. Phys., 1956,16, No. 1, 45–57, doi:10.1143/PTP.16.45

    work page doi:10.1143/ptp.16.45 1956

  61. [61]

    Rev., 1957,106, 893–898, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.106.893

    Yosida K., Phys. Rev., 1957,106, 893–898, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.106.893

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.106.893 1957

  62. [62]

    R., Sugawara H., Matsuda T

    Saha S. R., Sugawara H., Matsuda T. D., Sato H., Mallik R., Sampathkumaran E. V., Phys. Rev. B, 1999,60, 12162–12165, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.60.12162

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.60.12162 1999

  63. [63]

    6456, 914–918, doi:10.1126/science.aau0968

    Kurumaji T., Nakajima T., Hirschberger M., Kikkawa A., Yamasaki Y., Sagayama H., Nakao H., Taguchi Y., Arima T.-h., Tokura Y., Science, 2019,365, No. 6456, 914–918, doi:10.1126/science.aau0968

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aau0968 2019

  64. [64]

    HirschbergerM.,SpitzL.,NomotoT.,KurumajiT.,GaoS.,MasellJ.,NakajimaT.,KikkawaA.,YamasakiY., Sagayama H., Nakao H., Taguchi Y., Arita R., Arima T.-h., Tokura Y., Phys. Rev. Lett., 2020,125, 076602, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.076602

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.076602 2020

  65. [65]

    NomotoT.,KoretsuneT.,AritaR.,Phys.Rev.Lett.,2020,125,117204,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.117204

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.117204 2020

  66. [66]

    K., Paulose P

    Kumar R., Iyer K. K., Paulose P. L., Sampathkumaran E. V., Phys. Rev. B, 2020,101, 144440, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.101.144440

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.144440 2020

  67. [67]

    Spachmann S., Elghandour A., Frontzek M., Löser W., Klingeler R., Phys. Rev. B, 2021,103, 184424, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.103.184424

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.103.184424 2021

  68. [68]

    Nanotechnol., 2020,15, 444, doi:10.1038/s41565-020-0684-7

    KhanhN.D.,NakajimaT.,YuX.,GaoS.,ShibataK.,HirschbergerM.,YamasakiY.,SagayamaH.,NakaoH., Peng L., Nakajima K., Takagi R., Arima T.-h., Tokura Y., Seki S., Nat. Nanotechnol., 2020,15, 444, doi:10.1038/s41565-020-0684-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41565-020-0684-7 2020

  69. [69]

    D., Takagi R., TokuraY.,SekiS.,KindoK.,KohamaY.,Phys.Rev.B,2023,107,104421,doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.107.104421

    Matsuyama N., Nomura T., Imajo S., Nomoto T., Arita R., Sudo K., Kimata M., Khanh N. D., Takagi R., TokuraY.,SekiS.,KindoK.,KohamaY.,Phys.Rev.B,2023,107,104421,doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.107.104421

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.104421 2023

  70. [70]

    Wood G. D. A., Khalyavin D. D., Mayoh D. A., Bouaziz J., Hall A. E., Holt S. J. R., Orlandi F., Manuel P., Blügel S., Staunton J. B., Petrenko O. A., Lees M. R., Balakrishnan G., Phys. Rev. B, 2023,107, L180402, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.107.L180402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.l180402 2023

  71. [71]

    EremeevS.V.,GlazkovaD.,PoelchenG.,KraikerA.,AliK.,TarasovA.V.,SchulzS.,KliemtK.,ChulkovE.V., StolyarovV.S.,ErnstA.,KrellnerC.,UsachovD.Yu.,VyalikhD.V.,NanoscaleAdv.,2023,5,No.23,6678– 6687, doi:10.1039/D3NA00435J

    work page doi:10.1039/d3na00435j 2023

  72. [72]

    SpethmannJ.,KhanhN.D.,YoshimochiH.,TakagiR.,HayamiS.,MotomeY.,WiesendangerR.,SekiS.,von Bergmann K., Phys. Rev. Mater., 2024,8, 064404, doi:10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.8.064404

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.8.064404 2024

  73. [73]

    D., Kondo T., Science, 2025,388, No

    Dong Y., Kinoshita Y., Ochi M., Nakachi R., Higashinaka R., Hayami S., Wan Y., Arai Y., Huh S., Hashimoto M., Lu D., Tokunaga M., Aoki Y., Matsuda T. D., Kondo T., Science, 2025,388, No. 6747, 624–630, doi:10.1126/science.adj7710

    work page doi:10.1126/science.adj7710 2025

  74. [74]

    Nakamura S., Kabeya N., Kobayashi M., Araki K., Katoh K., Ochiai A., Phys. Rev. B, 2018,98, 054410, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.98.054410

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.054410 2018

  75. [75]

    Commun., 2019,10, No

    Hirschberger M., Nakajima T., Gao S., Peng L., Kikkawa A., Kurumaji T., Kriener M., Yamasaki Y., Sagayama H., Nakao H., Ohishi K., Kakurai K., Taguchi Y., Yu X., Arima T.-H., Tokura Y., Nat. Commun., 2019,10, No. 1, 5831, doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13675-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13675-4 2019

  76. [76]

    Phys., 2021,23, 023039, doi:10.1088/1367-2630/abdef9

    Hirschberger M., Hayami S., Tokura Y., New J. Phys., 2021,23, 023039, doi:10.1088/1367-2630/abdef9

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/abdef9 2021

  77. [77]

    Nakamura S., Kabeya N., Kobayashi M., Araki K., Katoh K., Ochiai A., Phys. Rev. B, 2023,107, 014422, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.107.014422

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.014422 2023

  78. [78]

    O., Nair H

    Ogunbunmi M. O., Nair H. S., Strydom A. M., Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci., 2023,48, No. 4, 480–501, doi:10.1080/10408436.2022.2075827

    work page doi:10.1080/10408436.2022.2075827 2023

  79. [79]

    S., Tucker G

    Gao S., Zaharko O., Tsurkan V., Su Y., White J. S., Tucker G. S., Roessli B., Bourdarot F., Sibille R., ChernyshovD.,FennellT.,LoidlA.,RüeggC.,Nat.Phys.,2017,13,No.2,157–161,doi:10.1038/nphys3914

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys3914 2017

  80. [80]

    D., Gómez Albarracín F

    Gao S., Rosales H. D., Gómez Albarracín F. A., Tsurkan V., Kaur G., Fennell T., Steffens P., Boehm M., ČermákP.,SchneidewindA.,RessoucheE.,CabraD.C.,RüeggC.,ZaharkoO.,Nature,2020,586,No.7828, 23705-19 S. Hayami 37–41, doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2716-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2716-8 2020

Showing first 80 references.