A Survey on LoRa Networking: Research Problems, Current Solutions and Open Issues

Jothi Prasanna Shanmuga Sundaram; Wan Du; Zhiwei Zhao

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 137 references

A Survey on LoRa Networking: Research Problems, Current Solutions and Open Issues

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This survey argues that LoRa networking's research problems sort into five families—energy, range, multiple access, error correction, and security—and maps recent solutions onto them.

desk verdict A useful but factually uneven survey of LoRa networking; the taxonomy helps, but the repeated 'open-source' claim and a few misattributions need fixing before I'd trust it as a guide. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.10195 v1 pith:EKLZNC22 submitted 2019-08-24 eess.SP cs.SYeess.SY

Jothi Prasanna Shanmuga Sundaram , Wan Du , Zhiwei Zhao This is my paper · ORCID

classification eess.SPcs.SYeess.SY

keywords LoRaWANLow-PowerWide-AreaNetworksInternetofThingswirelessnetworkingtaxonomysurveyopenissues

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is a survey of LoRa, a low-power wide-area networking technology that lets anyone build a long-range IoT network without cellular or third-party infrastructure. The authors try to establish that the field's research problems fall into five families: energy consumption, communication range, multiple access, error correction, and security. They assemble recent performance measurements and proposed solutions for each family and derive a set of open issues, including gateway placement, link coordination with acknowledgments, extending range without changing commercial chips, and application-specific security. A reader would care because the survey offers a way to see which LoRa problems have workable fixes and which remain unresolved.

What carries the argument

The organizing device is the paper's taxonomy (its Figure 3), a tree whose five branches are energy consumption, communication range, multiple access, error correction, and security. Two supporting tables (Table IV and Table V) attach published performance measurements and proposed solutions to those branches, so that any new LoRa contribution can be located as addressing one or more of the five problems. The taxonomy is what turns a list of papers into a claim about the shape of the field.

What would settle it

A systematic review that collects LoRa publications from the same period and asks whether each paper's central problem fits one of the five taxonomy branches would settle the claim; finding a substantial, coherent cluster of work—such as localization, mobility, regulatory compliance, or hardware design—that none of the five branches can accommodate would refute the paper's assertion that the taxonomy captures the field's research problems.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the diversity of LoRa research can be captured by a single taxonomy: five problem categories—energy consumption, communication range, multiple access (link coordination and resource allocation), error correction (channel coding and interference cancellation), and security—together with the measurements and solutions that address them. On the paper's account, a LoRa network's end-devices are battery-limited, must reach gateways over long distances, share unlicensed spectrum with many devices, recover from corrupted or collided packets, and resist key-compromise attacks, which is why each category is a live research problem. The paper maps roughly thirty recent systems and studies onto these categories, notes where measurements are missing (notably for energy and error correction), and lists open issues that follow from the gaps it finds.

Load-bearing premise

The survey's usefulness rests on its selection and reading of primary studies being accurate and representative, yet the paper gives no systematic search or inclusion criteria and contains apparent source-handling slips, so biased or misread sources would make the taxonomy and open issues misleading.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the taxonomy is right, any new LoRa contribution can be classified by which of the five problems it addresses, making the state of the art easier to assess.
The paper's analysis points to concrete open issues: optimal gateway placement, downstream acknowledgments that degrade throughput, dynamic retransmission timers, range extension without modifying commercial chips, and security requirements that depend on the application.
The survey reports that no performance measurements exist for energy consumption or error correction, so those two branches are the least empirically grounded parts of the taxonomy.
The paper's comparison of LoRa with other LPWAN technologies indicates that LoRa's open standard and autonomy come with trade-offs in multiple access and security that the survey's open issues target.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The taxonomy could be reused as a coding scheme for a fully systematic review, where every LoRa paper from the same period is classified into the five branches; that exercise would also reveal whether any substantial body of work falls outside all of them.
The open issues imply an experimental agenda that the paper does not perform: measuring how gateway density, acknowledgment traffic, and adaptive retransmission timers interact on a working LoRa deployment.
If future LoRa work adopts the five categories as a shared vocabulary, individual systems could be compared more directly on the problem they solve rather than by reported gains over different baselines.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Here's my take on 1908.10195. It's a survey, so the novelty bar is different. What it does well: it provides a five-part taxonomy (energy, range, multiple access, error correction, security) and organizes recent measurements and solutions into tables that make the literature easier to scan than prior surveys [9], [16], [77]. The open-issues list at the end is genuinely useful for someone starting in the area. No new experiments, derivations, or falsifiable predictions, so this is an organizing contribution, not a scientific one.

The soft spots are real and, in a survey, they matter more than in a research paper because readers rely on the accuracy of the map. The biggest is the repeated claim that LoRa is 'open-source' (Section I, Table I). The PHY is Semtech-proprietary; LoRaWAN is an open specification. The abstract correctly says 'open standard,' so the paper contradicts itself. The same table labels NB-IoT 'Open Source,' which is also wrong. That's a load-bearing error because the paper motivates LoRa by its openness. There's also a misattribution in Section V-B: the Royal Flora industrial measurement is described as 'Navarro et al. [89] and Haxhibeqiri et al. [36],' but the detailed description matches Haxhibeqiri's study; [89] is a different paper about LoRaWAN and 4G/5G integration. Also, 'Seoul, North Korea' in Section III and Table III should be South Korea. And there's a duplicated/misplaced 'Key Insights' heading in Section V-D that says 'error correction' when it's in the multiple access section. Minor typos like 'Margin' for Magrin and 'Cumo' for Cuomo are scattered but easy to fix.

There's no stated systematic search or inclusion criteria, so I'd treat the coverage as author-selected. That's not fatal—most surveys are—but it means the taxonomy is an editorial choice, not a field-wide census.

If I were the editor, I would send this to peer review rather than desk reject, because the field lacks a current taxonomy-driven survey and this one fills a real need. The errors are correctable; the structure is sound. A serious referee can verify the facts and request the fixes. After that, I'd be comfortable citing it as an entry point. Before that, I'd be cautious.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript presents a survey of LoRa networking, covering the technical background of LoRa and LoRaWAN, a set of real-world deployments, a five-part taxonomy of research challenges (energy consumption, communication range, multiple access, error correction, and security), and a review of recent solutions and measurements addressing those challenges. It closes with a set of open issues such as optimal gateway placement, dynamic link coordination, further range improvements, and application-specific security requirements. The paper's central claim is that its taxonomy provides a clear and reliable map of LoRa networking challenges, solutions, and open issues, and that this map is more focused and more structured than previous LPWAN surveys. The survey is primarily descriptive and contains no derivations, simulations, or new experimental results.

Significance. If its factual content is reliable, the survey would be a useful entry point for researchers and practitioners needing a structured overview of LoRa networking problems and the solution landscape. The taxonomy in Figure 3, the comparison of LPWAN technologies in Table I, and the solution/measurement summaries in Tables IV and V provide a digestible organization of a large and scattered literature. The open-issues discussion in Section VI is grounded in the surveyed works and identifies several concrete gaps, including dynamic ACK handling, retransmission policy design, and application-specific security. The paper's value is inherently dependent on the accuracy of its source handling; a survey that mislabels core technology properties or misattributes experimental results can mislead rather than guide. The manuscript has no machine-checked proofs or reproducible artifacts, but that is not a requirement for a survey; its contribution is organizational and expository.

major comments (2)

[Section I and Table I] The statements that LoRa is an 'open-source technology' (Section I, paragraph 'Finally, LoRa networking [21] is widely used...') and the Table I entries listing LoRa and NB-IoT as 'Open source' are factually incorrect. LoRa denotes a proprietary physical layer owned by Semtech, while LoRaWAN is an open specification maintained by the LoRa Alliance; NB-IoT is a 3GPP standard rather than an open-source project. The abstract correctly says LoRa 'specifies an open standard,' which makes the mismatch with the body text and Table I explicit. This is not a subtle interpretation issue: the paper repeatedly relies on the claimed 'openness' as a key advantage enabling autonomous low-cost deployment, and Table I is the foundational comparison table for the whole survey. The text and table should be corrected to distinguish an open specification from an open-source implementation, and the implications for autonomous deployment should be rephrased accordingly.
[Section V-B, Testbed Measurements] The paragraph beginning 'Navarro et al. [89] and Haxhibeqiri et al. [36] evaluated communication range of LoRa in Industrial environments' attributes the Royal Flora Auction Center measurement to reference [89] in addition to [36]. The described experiment---LORANK gateway mounted 6 m above the floor, WiMOD-IM880A end-devices on trolleys at 1.7 m, 43 measuring points, packet-loss results at SF7/SF12---is the industrial case study of Haxhibeqiri et al. [36]. Reference [89] is Navarro-Ortiz et al., 'Integration of LoRaWAN and 4G/5G for the Industrial Internet of Things,' which does not report this Royal Flora experiment. The sentence should attribute the measurement solely to [36], or should add an accurate summary of what [89] actually contributes. Since the survey's central claim is to summarize recent solutions faithfully, this misattribution is a load-bearing source-handling error.

minor comments (6)

[Section III and Table III] The deployment location 'Seoul, North Korea' is incorrect; Seoul is in South Korea (the Republic of Korea).
[Table II] The acronym table defines 'OFDM' as 'Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access'; OFDM stands for Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing, while OFDMA is the multiple-access variant.
[Section V-D] The 'Key Insights' paragraph at the end of the Resource Allocation subsection repeats the heading and the opening phrase 'The key insights regarding error correction are listed as follows,' even though the following bullets concern resource allocation and parameter selection. The heading and introductory clause should be corrected to refer to multiple access/resource allocation.
[Section V-D] The text refers to 'Margin et al. [26]' and 'Cumo et. al [65]'; the correct author names are Magrin et al. and Cuomo et al., matching the reference list.
[Section V-E] The text refers to 'Arsas et al. [47]'; the correct spelling is Aras et al., as in the reference list.
[Reference [32] and Table IV] The author name is spelled 'Fuidiak' in reference [32] and in Table IV; the correct spelling is Fujdiak.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation: this is a narrative survey whose taxonomy and open issues are classifications of cited prior work, not results derived from its own claims; minor self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper is a survey article, not a technical derivation. It contains no fitted parameters, no equations from which a result is computed, and no prediction that is later validated against data. The central contribution is a taxonomy of LoRa research problems (Fig. 3) and summaries of existing measurements and solutions (Tables IV and V); these are organizational claims about the literature, not derivations. The open issues in Section VI are reasoned recommendations based on the surveyed work, and they do not reduce to any quantity fitted or assumed earlier in the paper. A few references are by the same authors (e.g., Gao et al. [91] and Du et al. [96], [97]), but they are presented as ordinary surveyed systems alongside dozens of external works, and the taxonomy does not depend on establishing their correctness. The repeated description of LoRa as 'open-source' is a factual accuracy issue, not a circularity issue, as is the apparent misattribution of the Royal Flora measurement; both concern source handling rather than reasoning from inputs to outputs. The duplicated 'Key Insights' heading in Section V-D is an editorial flaw and does not affect circularity. Overall, the survey's claims are not equivalent to their inputs by construction, so no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is a survey, so there are no fitted parameters, derivation axioms, or invented physical entities. The assumptions listed are background domain beliefs the survey relies on for its framing and coverage decisions.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption LoRa and LoRaWAN form an open standard that enables autonomous networks without third-party infrastructure
Repeated in the abstract and Section I; only partly true because the LoRa PHY is proprietary Semtech technology while the LoRaWAN protocol is open.
domain assumption Spreading factors SF7 to SF12 are orthogonal and concurrent transmissions with different spreading factors can be received on the same channel
Stated in Section II-A and used in the multiple-access discussion; treated as established from [80] rather than proven in this paper.
domain assumption The selected references are a representative sample of LoRa networking research
The survey provides no systematic search or inclusion criteria; Section I states the selection informally.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Survey on LoRa Networking: Research Problems, Current Solutions and Open Issues." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EKLZNC22

@misc{pith2026190810195,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Survey on LoRa Networking: Research Problems, Current Solutions and Open Issues},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EKLZNC22}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.10195}
}

read the original abstract

Wireless networks have been widely deployed for many Internet-of-Things (IoT) applications, like smart cities and precision agriculture. Low Power Wide Area Networking (LPWAN) is an emerging IoT networking paradigm to meet three key requirements of IoT applications, i.e., low cost, large scale deployment and high energy efficiency. Among all available LPWAN technologies, LoRa networking has attracted much attention from both academia and industry, since it specifies an open standard and allows us to build autonomous LPWAN networks without any third-party infrastructure. Many LoRa networks have been developed recently, e.g., managing solar plants in Carson City, Nevada, USA and power monitoring in Lyon and Grenoble, France. However, there are still many research challenges to develop practical LoRa networks, e.g., link coordination, resource allocation, reliable transmissions and security. This article provides a comprehensive survey on LoRa networks, including the technical challenges of deploying LoRa networks and recent solutions. Based on our detailed analysis of current solutions, some open issues of LoRa networking are discussed. The goal of this survey paper is to inspire more works on improving the performance of LoRa networks and enabling more practical deployments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.10195 by the authors.

**Figure 3.** Taxonomy of LoRa Research Challenges E. Security For all computer communications, security is a major concern. There are many security attacks like eavesdropping, selective forwarding and node impersonation [86]. All the above mentioned attacks try to obtain the key used for encryption. If this key is compromised, the entire system can be broken. Currently, LoRa technology uses a symmetric key cryptographic techniq… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

137 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

[9]

Low power wide area networks: An overview,

U. Raza, P. Kulkarni, and M. Sooriyabandara, “Low power wide area networks: An overview,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 855–873, 2017

2017
[16]

A survey on LPW A technology: LoRa and NB-IoT,

R. S. Sinha, Y . Wei, and S.-H. Hwang, “A survey on LPW A technology: LoRa and NB-IoT,” ICT Express, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 14–21, 2017

2017
[77]

A survey of lorawan for iot: From technology to application,

J. Haxhibeqiri, E. De Poorter, I. Moerman, and J. Hoebeke, “A survey of lorawan for iot: From technology to application,” Sensors, vol. 18, no. 11, p. 3995, 2018

work page 2018
[89]

Integration of LoRaW AN and 4G/5G for the Industrial Internet of Things,

J. Navarro-Ortiz, S. Sendra, P. Ameigeiras, and J. M. Lopez-Soler, “Integration of LoRaW AN and 4G/5G for the Industrial Internet of Things,” IEEE Communications Magazine , vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 60–67, 2018

work page 2018
[36]

LoRa indoor coverage and performance in an industrial environment: Case study,

J. Haxhibeqiri, A. Karaa ˘gac ¸, F. Van den Abeele, W. Joseph, I. Moer- man, and J. Hoebeke, “LoRa indoor coverage and performance in an industrial environment: Case study,” inProceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Technologies And Factory Automation, 2017, pp. 1–8

2017
[21]

Do LoRa low- power wide-area networks scale?

M. C. Bor, U. Roedig, T. V oigt, and J. M. Alonso, “Do LoRa low- power wide-area networks scale?” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems, 2016, pp. 59–67

2016
[1]

A survey on internet of things: Architecture, enabling technologies, security and privacy, and applications,

J. Lin, W. Yu, N. Zhang, X. Yang, H. Zhang, and W. Zhao, “A survey on internet of things: Architecture, enabling technologies, security and privacy, and applications,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 1125–1142, 2017

2017
[2]

Internet of things: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications,

A. Al-Fuqaha, M. Guizani, M. Mohammadi, M. Aledhari, and M. Ayyash, “Internet of things: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutori- als, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 2347–2376, 2015

2015

Show all 137 references

[3]

Research directions for the internet of things,

J. A. Stankovic, “Research directions for the internet of things,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–9, 2014

2014
[4]

5G americas LTE progress leading to the 5G massive Internet of Things,

“5G americas LTE progress leading to the 5G massive Internet of Things,” 2017

2017
[5]

Northstream white paper, Massive IoT: Different technologies for different needs,

“Northstream white paper, Massive IoT: Different technologies for different needs,” 2017

2017
[6]

Ericsson mobility report,

Ericsson, “Ericsson mobility report,” 2017

2017
[7]

A survey of standards for machine-to-machine and the internet of things,

V . Gazis, “A survey of standards for machine-to-machine and the internet of things,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 482–511, 2017

2017
[8]

Machine-to-machine communications in ultra-dense networksa sur- vey,

S. Chen, R. Ma, H.-H. Chen, H. Zhang, W. Meng, and J. Liu, “Machine-to-machine communications in ultra-dense networksa sur- vey,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1478–1503, 2017

2017
[10]

A survey of enabling technologies of low power and long range machine-to-machine communications,

H. Wang and A. O. Fapojuwo, “A survey of enabling technologies of low power and long range machine-to-machine communications,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 2621–2639, 2017

2017
[11]

3GPP standards for the Internet-of-Things,

D. Flore, “3GPP standards for the Internet-of-Things,” Recuperado el, vol. 25, 2016

2016
[12]

Sigfox system description,

J. C. Zuniga and B. Ponsard, “Sigfox system description,” LPWAN@ IETF97, Nov. 14th, 2016

2016
[13]

Long-range IoT technologies: The dawn of LoRa,

L. Vangelista, A. Zanella, and M. Zorzi, “Long-range IoT technologies: The dawn of LoRa,” in Proceedings of the Future Access Enablers of Ubiquitous and Intelligent Infrastructures , 2015, pp. 51–58

2015
[14]

LTE-advanced in 3GPP rel-13/14: An evolution toward 5G,

J. Lee, Y . Kim, Y . Kwak, J. Zhang, A. Papasakellariou, T. Novlan, C. Sun, and Y . Li, “LTE-advanced in 3GPP rel-13/14: An evolution toward 5G,” IEEE Communications Magazine , vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 36– 42, 2016

2016
[15]

End-to-end simulation of 5G mmwave networks,

M. Mezzavilla, M. Zhang, M. Polese, R. Ford, S. Dutta, S. Rangan, and M. Zorzi, “End-to-end simulation of 5G mmwave networks,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 2237–2263, 2018

2018
[17]

How RPMA works?

Ingenu, “How RPMA works?” White Paper, 2016

2016
[18]

Webb, Understanding Weightless: Technology, Equipment, and Network Deployment for M2M Communications in White Space

W. Webb, Understanding Weightless: Technology, Equipment, and Network Deployment for M2M Communications in White Space. Cam- bridge University Press, 2012

2012
[19]

A technical overview of LoRaW AN,

LoRa-Alliance, “A technical overview of LoRaW AN,” Technical Mar- keting Workgroup, Nov. 2015

2015
[20]

On track of sigfox conﬁdentiality with end-to-end encryption,

R. Fujdiak, P. Blazek, K. Mikhaylov, L. Malina, P. Mlynek, J. Misurec, and V . Blazek, “On track of sigfox conﬁdentiality with end-to-end encryption,” in Proceedings of the 13th ACM International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security , 2018, p. 19

2018
[22]

Smart buildings transformed using semtech’s LoRa technol- ogy,

Semtech, “Smart buildings transformed using semtech’s LoRa technol- ogy,” Apr. 2017, white paper

2017
[23]

Smart cities transformed using semtech’s LoRa technology,

Semtech, “Smart cities transformed using semtech’s LoRa technology,” Jul. 2017, white paper

2017
[24]

Revolutionising smart agriculture using semtech’s LoRa technology,

Semtech, “Revolutionising smart agriculture using semtech’s LoRa technology,” Oct. 2017, white paper

2017
[25]

Real-world LoRaW AN network capacity for electrical me- tering applications,

Semtech, “Real-world LoRaW AN network capacity for electrical me- tering applications,” Sep. 2017, white paper

2017
[26]

Performance evaluation of LoRa networks in a smart city scenario,

D. Magrin, M. Centenaro, and L. Vangelista, “Performance evaluation of LoRa networks in a smart city scenario,” in Proceedings of the International Conference On Communications , 2017, pp. 1–7

2017
[27]

Optimal sensor placement and measurement of wind for water quality studies in urban reservoirs,

W. Du, Z. Xing, M. Li, B. He, L. H. C. Chua, and H. Miao, “Optimal sensor placement and measurement of wind for water quality studies in urban reservoirs,” in Proceedings of the International symposium on Information processing in sensor networks , 2014, pp. 167–178

2014
[28]

Sensor placement and measurement of wind for water quality studies in urban reservoirs,

W. Du, Z. Xing, M. Li, B. He, L. H. C. Chua, and H. Miao, “Sensor placement and measurement of wind for water quality studies in urban reservoirs,” ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks , vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 41:1–41:27, 2015

2015
[29]

Pando: Fountain-enabled fast data dissemination with constructive interference,

W. Du, J. C. Liando, H. Zhang, and M. Li, “Pando: Fountain-enabled fast data dissemination with constructive interference,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking , vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 820–833, 2017

2017
[30]

When pipelines meet fountain: Fast data dissemination in wireless sensor networks,

W. Du, J. Liando, H. Zhang, and M. Li, “When pipelines meet fountain: Fast data dissemination in wireless sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems , 2015, pp. 365–378

2015
[31]

Fuota process summary technical recommendation,

J.Catalano, J-P.Coupigny, M.Kuyper, N.sornin, and A.Yegin, “Fuota process summary technical recommendation,” 2019

2019
[32]

Simulated coverage estimation of single gateway LoRaW AN network,

R. Fuidiak, P. Mlynek, J. Misurec, and M. Strajt, “Simulated coverage estimation of single gateway LoRaW AN network,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Process- ing, 2018, pp. 1–4

2018
[33]

On the coverage of LPW ANs: range evaluation and channel attenuation model for LoRa technology,

J. Petajajarvi, K. Mikhaylov, A. Roivainen, T. Hanninen, and M. Pet- tissalo, “On the coverage of LPW ANs: range evaluation and channel attenuation model for LoRa technology,” in Proceedings of the Inter- national Conference on ITS Telecommunications , 2015, pp. 55–59

2015
[34]

Evaluation of LoRa LPW AN technology for indoor remote health and wellbeing monitoring,

J. Pet ¨aj¨aj¨arvi, K. Mikhaylov, R. Yasmin, M. H¨am¨al¨ainen, and J. Iinatti, “Evaluation of LoRa LPW AN technology for indoor remote health and wellbeing monitoring,” International Journal of Wireless Information Networks, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 153–165, 2017

2017
[35]

Development and range testing of a LoRaW AN system in an urban environment,

N. Harris and J. Curry, “Development and range testing of a LoRaW AN system in an urban environment,” World Academy of Science, Engi- neering and Technology, International Journal of Electrical, Computer, Energetic, Electronic and Communication Engineering , vol. 12, no. 1, pp...

2018
[37]

Analysis of capacity and scalability of the LoRa low power wide area network technology,

K. Mikhaylov, J. Petaejaejaervi, and T. Haenninen, “Analysis of capacity and scalability of the LoRa low power wide area network technology,” in Proceedings of the European Wireless Conference , 2016, pp. 1–6

2016
[38]

LoRaW AN’s capacity trials in dense urban environments

Semtech, “LoRaW AN’s capacity trials in dense urban environments.”
[39]

On the limits of LoRaW AN channel access,

D. Bankov, E. Khorov, and A. Lyakhov, “On the limits of LoRaW AN channel access,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering and Telecommunication, 2016, pp. 10–14

2016
[40]

LoRa protocol performance assessment in critical noise conditions,

L. Angrisani, P. Arpaia, F. Bonavolont `a, M. Conti, and A. Liccardo, “LoRa protocol performance assessment in critical noise conditions,” in Proceedings of the International Forum on Research and Technologies for Society and Industry , 2017, pp. 1–5

2017
[41]

LoRaW AN in the wild: Measurements from the things network,

N. Blenn and F. Kuipers, “LoRaW AN in the wild: Measurements from the things network,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.03086 , 2017

2017 arXiv
[42]

Interference measurements in the European 868 MHz ISM band with focus on LoRa and SigFox,

M. Lauridsen, B. Vejlgaard, I. Z. Kovacs, H. Nguyen, and P. Mogensen, “Interference measurements in the European 868 MHz ISM band with focus on LoRa and SigFox,” in Proceedings of the Wireless Communications and Networking Conference , 2017, pp. 1–6

2017
[43]

Coverage and capacity analysis of Sigfox, LoRa, GPRS, and NB-IoT,

B. Vejlgaard, M. Lauridsen, H. Nguyen, I. Z. Kov ´acs, P. Mogensen, and M. Sorensen, “Coverage and capacity analysis of Sigfox, LoRa, GPRS, and NB-IoT,” in Proceedings of the Vehicular Technology Conference, 2017, pp. 4–7

2017
[44]

Evaluation of LoRa receiver performance under co-technology inter- ference,

G. Zhu, C.-H. Liao, M. Suzuki, Y . Narusue, and H. Morikawa, “Evaluation of LoRa receiver performance under co-technology inter- ference,” in Proceedings of the Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference, 2018, pp. 1–7

2018
[45]

Inves- tigating interference between LoRa and IEEE 802.15.4g networks,

C. Orfanidis, L. M. Feeney, M. Jacobsson, and P. Gunningberg, “Inves- tigating interference between LoRa and IEEE 802.15.4g networks,” in Proceedings of the Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications, 2017, pp. 1–8

2017
[46]

Collision and packet loss analysis in a LoRaW AN network,

G. Ferr ´e, “Collision and packet loss analysis in a LoRaW AN network,” in Proceedings of the European Signal Processing Conference , 2017, pp. 2586–2590. 17

2017
[47]

Exploring the security vulnerabilities of LoRa,

E. Aras, G. S. Ramachandran, P. Lawrence, and D. Hughes, “Exploring the security vulnerabilities of LoRa,” in Proceedings of the Interna- tional Conference on Cybernetics , 2017, pp. 1–6

2017
[48]

Analysis of LoRaW AN v1. 1 security,

I. Butun, N. Pereira, and M. Gidlund, “Analysis of LoRaW AN v1. 1 security,” in Proceedings of the MobiHoc Workshop on Experiences with the Design and Implementation of Smart Objects , 2018, pp. 5–10

2018
[49]

Lora security: Building a secure lora solution,

R. Miller, “Lora security: Building a secure lora solution,” MWR Labs Whitepaper, 2016

2016
[50]

Analysis, design and implementation of secure LoRaW AN sensor networks,

B. Oniga, V . Dadarlat, E. De Poorter, and A. Munteanu, “Analysis, design and implementation of secure LoRaW AN sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing , 2017, pp. 421–428

2017
[51]

Empowering low- power wide area networks in urban settings,

R. Eletreby, D. Zhang, S. Kumar, and O. Ya ˘gan, “Empowering low- power wide area networks in urban settings,” in Proceedings of the Conference of the Special Interest Group on Data Communication , 2017, pp. 309–321

2017
[52]

Charm: Exploiting geographical diver- sity through coherent combining in low-power wide-area networks,

A. Dongare, R. Narayanan, A. Gadre, A. Luong, A. Balanuta, S. Ku- mar, B. Iannucci, and A. Rowe, “Charm: Exploiting geographical diver- sity through coherent combining in low-power wide-area networks,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Processing in...

2018
[53]

PLoRa: a passive long-range data network from ambient lora transmissions,

Y . Peng, L. Shangguan, Y . Hu, Y . Qian, X. Lin, X. Chen, D. Fang, and K. Jamieson, “PLoRa: a passive long-range data network from ambient lora transmissions,” in Proceedings of the Conference of the Special Interest Group on Data Communication , 2018, pp. 147–160

2018
[54]

LoRa backscatter: Enabling the vision of ubiquitous con- nectivity,

V . Talla, M. Hessar, B. Kellogg, A. Najaﬁ, J. R. Smith, and S. Gol- lakota, “LoRa backscatter: Enabling the vision of ubiquitous con- nectivity,” Proceedings of the on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, vol. 1, no. 3, p. 105, 2017

2017
[55]

Netscatter: Enabling large- scale backscatter networks,

M. Hessar, A. Najaﬁ, and S. Gollakota, “Netscatter: Enabling large- scale backscatter networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.05195 , 2018

2018 arXiv
[56]

DaRe: Data recovery through application layer coding for LoRaW AN,

P. J. Marcelis, V . S. Rao, and R. V . Prasad, “DaRe: Data recovery through application layer coding for LoRaW AN,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet-of-Things Design and Imple- mentation, 2017, pp. 97–108

2017
[57]

Low power wide area network analysis: Can LoRa scale?

O. Georgiou and U. Raza, “Low power wide area network analysis: Can LoRa scale?” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 162–165, 2017

2017
[58]

Security of LoRaW AN v1. 1 in backward compatibility scenarios,

T. C. D ¨onmez and E. Nigussie, “Security of LoRaW AN v1. 1 in backward compatibility scenarios,” Procedia Computer Science , vol. 134, pp. 51–58, 2018

2018
[59]

Application layer coding for iot: beneﬁts, lim- itations, and implementation aspects,

M. Sandell and U. Raza, “Application layer coding for iot: beneﬁts, lim- itations, and implementation aspects,” IEEE Systems Journal , no. 99, pp. 1–8, 2018

2018
[60]

LoRa scalability: A simulation model based on interference measurements,

J. Haxhibeqiri, F. Van den Abeele, I. Moerman, and J. Hoebeke, “LoRa scalability: A simulation model based on interference measurements,” Sensors, vol. 17, no. 6, p. 1193, 2017

2017
[61]

Improving reliability and scalability of LoRaW ANs through lightweight scheduling,

B. Reynders, Q. Wang, P. Tuset-Peiro, X. Vilajosana, and S. Pollin, “Improving reliability and scalability of LoRaW ANs through lightweight scheduling,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , 2018

2018
[62]

A fair adaptive data rate algorithm for LoRaW AN,

K. Q. Abdelfadeel, V . Cionca, and D. Pesch, “A fair adaptive data rate algorithm for LoRaW AN,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.00522 , 2018

2018 arXiv
[63]

Power and spreading factor control in low power wide area networks,

B. Reynders, W. Meert, and S. Pollin, “Power and spreading factor control in low power wide area networks,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Communications , 2017, pp. 1–6

2017
[64]

Does bidirectional trafﬁc do more harm than good in LoRaW AN based LPW A networks?

A.-I. Pop, U. Raza, P. Kulkarni, and M. Sooriyabandara, “Does bidirectional trafﬁc do more harm than good in LoRaW AN based LPW A networks?”arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.04174 , 2017

2017 arXiv
[65]

EXPLoRa: Extending the performance of LoRa by suitable spreading factor allocations,

F. Cuomo, M. Campo, A. Caponi, G. Bianchi, G. Rossini, and P. Pisani, “EXPLoRa: Extending the performance of LoRa by suitable spreading factor allocations,” inProceedings of the Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications , 2017, pp. 1–8

2017
[66]

Scalability analysis of large-scale LoRaW AN networks in NS-3,

F. Van den Abeele, J. Haxhibeqiri, I. Moerman, and J. Hoebeke, “Scalability analysis of large-scale LoRaW AN networks in NS-3,” Internet of Things Journal , vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 2186–2198, 2017

2017
[67]

On LoRaW AN scala- bility: Empirical evaluation of susceptibility to inter-network interfer- ence,

K. Mikhaylov, J. Pet ¨aj¨aj¨arvi, and J. Janhunen, “On LoRaW AN scala- bility: Empirical evaluation of susceptibility to inter-network interfer- ence,” in Proceedings of the European Conference on Networks and Communications, 2017, pp. 1–6

2017
[68]

An experimental evaluation of the reliability of LoRa long-range low-power wireless communication,

M. Cattani, C. A. Boano, and K. R ¨omer, “An experimental evaluation of the reliability of LoRa long-range low-power wireless communication,” Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks , vol. 6, no. 2, p. 7, 2017

2017
[69]

Mitigating inter-network interference in LoRa networks,

T. V oigt, M. Bor, and U. Roedig, “Mitigating inter-network interference in LoRa networks,” in Proceedings of the MadCom: New Wireless Communication Paradigms for the Internet of Things , 2017, pp. 323– 328

2017
[70]

Risk analysis and countermeasure for bit-ﬂipping attack in LoRaW AN,

J. Lee, D. Hwang, J. Park, and K.-H. Kim, “Risk analysis and countermeasure for bit-ﬂipping attack in LoRaW AN,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Networking , 2017, pp. 549–551

2017
[71]

A simple and efﬁcient replay attack prevention scheme for LoRaW AN,

J. Kim and J. Song, “A simple and efﬁcient replay attack prevention scheme for LoRaW AN,” inProceedings of the International Conference on Communication and Network Security , 2017, pp. 32–36

2017
[72]

Scenario and countermea- sure for replay attack using join request messages in LoRaW AN,

S. Na, D. Hwang, W. Shin, and K.-H. Kim, “Scenario and countermea- sure for replay attack using join request messages in LoRaW AN,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Network- ing, 2017, pp. 718–720

2017
[73]

Low power wide area network security,

P. Girard, “Low power wide area network security,” gematlo, Tech. Rep., Dec. 2015

2015
[74]

A dual key-based activation scheme for secure LoRaW AN,

J. Kim and J. Song, “A dual key-based activation scheme for secure LoRaW AN,”Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing , vol. 2017, pp. 1–12, 2017

2017
[75]

Enhancing the security of the IoT LoRaW AN architecture,

S. Naoui, M. E. Elhdhili, and L. A. Saidane, “Enhancing the security of the IoT LoRaW AN architecture,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Performance Evaluation and Modeling in Wired and Wireless Networks, 2016, pp. 1–7

2016
[76]

Security analysis of Lo- RaW AN join procedure for internet of things networks,

S. Tomasin, S. Zulian, and L. Vangelista, “Security analysis of Lo- RaW AN join procedure for internet of things networks,” inProceedings of the Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Work- shops, 2017, pp. 1–6

2017
[78]

Automated estimation of link quality for lora: A remote sensing approach,

S. Demetri, M. Z ´u˜niga, G. P. Picco, F. Kuipers, L. Bruzzone, and T. Telkamp, “Automated estimation of link quality for lora: A remote sensing approach,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN) , 2019

2019
[79]

Loraicdcsnetwork: Radio propagation models and performance evaluation in various environ- ments in lebanon,

R. El Chall, S. Lahoud, and M. El Helou, “Loraicdcsnetwork: Radio propagation models and performance evaluation in various environ- ments in lebanon,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , 2019

2019
[80]

Known and unknown facts of lora: Experiences from a large-scale measurement study,

J. C. Liando, A. Gamage, A. W. Tengourtius, and M. Li, “Known and unknown facts of lora: Experiences from a large-scale measurement study,”ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN) , vol. 15, no. 2, p. 16, 2019

2019
[81]

Smart parking,

Semtech, “Smart parking,” https://www.semtech.com/lora/ lora-applications, White Paper
[82]

Smart lighting,

Semtech, “Smart lighting,” https://www.semtech.com/lora/ lora-applications, White Paper
[83]

Lora technology: Transforming golf courses with iot,

Semtech, “Lora technology: Transforming golf courses with iot,” Tech. Rep., 2018

2018
[84]

Lora technology: Mallorca develops ﬁrst lorawan smart island,

Semtech, “Lora technology: Mallorca develops ﬁrst lorawan smart island,” Tech. Rep., 2018

2018
[85]

Resource efﬁciency in Low-Power Wide- Area Networks for IoT applications,

Z. Qin and J. A. McCann, “Resource efﬁciency in Low-Power Wide- Area Networks for IoT applications,” in Proceedings of the Global Communications Conference, 2017, pp. 1–7

2017
[86]

Securing wireless sensor networks: a survey,

Y . Zhou, Y . Fang, and Y . Zhang, “Securing wireless sensor networks: a survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , vol. 10, no. 3, 2008

2008
[87]

Vibrations powered LoRa sensor: An electromechanical energy harvester working on a real bridge,

F. Orfei, C. B. Mezzetti, and F. Cottone, “Vibrations powered LoRa sensor: An electromechanical energy harvester working on a real bridge,” in Proceedings of the Sensors , 2016, pp. 1–3

2016
[88]

Lorea: A backscatter architecture that achieves a long communication range,

A. Varshney, O. Harms, C. P ´erez-Penichet, C. Rohner, F. Hermans, and T. V oigt, “Lorea: A backscatter architecture that achieves a long communication range,” in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems , 2017, p. 18

2017
[90]

LORANK gateway, ideetron lora products,

Ideetron, “LORANK gateway, ideetron lora products,” url = https://webshop.ideetron.nl/LoRa
[91]

Towards Energy-Fairness in LoRa Networks,

W. Gao and W. Du and Z. Zhao and G. Min and M. Singhal, “Towards Energy-Fairness in LoRa Networks,” in IEEE ICDCS, 2019

2019
[92]

Braidio: An integrated active-passive radio for mobile devices with asymmetric energy bud- gets,

P. Hu, P. Zhang, M. Rostami, and D. Ganesan, “Braidio: An integrated active-passive radio for mobile devices with asymmetric energy bud- gets,” in Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGCOMM Conference. ACM, 2016, pp. 384–397

2016
[93]

WIMOD - IM880A Data sheet,

WIMOD, “WIMOD - IM880A Data sheet,” WiMOD iM880A , Tech. Rep., Jul. 2017

2017
[94]

Wirnet station datasheet,

Kerlink, “Wirnet station datasheet,” Tech. Rep., Jan. 2016

2016
[95]

Sx1272/3/6/7/8: Lora modem designers guide,

Semtech, “Sx1272/3/6/7/8: Lora modem designers guide,” Jul. 2013, revision 1. 18

2013
[96]

From rateless to distanceless: Enabling sparse sensor network deployment in large areas,

W. Du, Z. Li, J. C. Liando, and M. Li, “From rateless to distanceless: Enabling sparse sensor network deployment in large areas,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking , vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 2498–2511, 2016

2016
[97]

From rateless to distanceless: enabling sparse sensor network deployment in large areas,

W. Du, Z. Li, J. Liando, and M. Li, “From rateless to distanceless: enabling sparse sensor network deployment in large areas,” in Pro- ceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems, 2014, pp. 134–147

2014
[98]

Snow: Sensor network over white spaces,

A. Saifullah, M. Rahman, D. Ismail, C. Lu, R. Chandra, and J. Liu, “Snow: Sensor network over white spaces,” in ACM IPSN, 2016

2016
[99]

Integrating low-power wide-area net- works in white spaces,

M. Rahman and A. Saifullah, “Integrating low-power wide-area net- works in white spaces,” in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Internet-of-Things Design and Implementation , 2018, pp. 255–260

2018
[100]

Ftrack: Parallel decoding for lora transmissions,

X. Xia, Y . Zheng, and T. Gu, “Ftrack: Parallel decoding for lora transmissions,” in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems , 2019

2019
[101]

Proposal for evaluation methodology for 802.16 p

R. Huang, H. Li, B. Hamzeh, Y . Choi, S. Mohanty, and C. Hsu, “Proposal for evaluation methodology for 802.16 p.”
[102]

Employing p-csma on a lora network simulator,

N. Kouvelas, V . Rao, and R. Prasad, “Employing p-csma on a lora network simulator,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.12263 , 2018

2018 arXiv
[103]

Cognitive interference manage- ment in retransmission-based wireless networks,

M. Levorato, U. Mitra, and M. Zorzi, “Cognitive interference manage- ment in retransmission-based wireless networks,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory , vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 3023–3046, 2012

2012
[104]

A qoe-based link adaptation scheme for h. 264/svc video multicast over ieee 802.11,

W.-H. Kuo, R. Kaliski, and H.-Y . Wei, “A qoe-based link adaptation scheme for h. 264/svc video multicast over ieee 802.11,” IEEE Trans- actions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology , vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 812–826, 2015

2015
[105]

A probabilistic and op- portunistic ﬂooding algorithm in wireless sensor networks,

D. Chang, K. Cho, N. Choi, Y . Choi et al. , “A probabilistic and op- portunistic ﬂooding algorithm in wireless sensor networks,” Computer Communications, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 500–506, 2012

2012
[106]

Optimal strategies for cooperative mac-layer retransmission in wireless networks,

L. Xiong, L. Libman, and G. Mao, “Optimal strategies for cooperative mac-layer retransmission in wireless networks,” in IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference , 2008

2008
[107]

Distributed reinforcement learning frameworks for cooperative retransmission in wireless networks,

G. Naddafzadeh-Shirazi, P.-Y . Kong, and C.-K. Tham, “Distributed reinforcement learning frameworks for cooperative retransmission in wireless networks,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology , vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 4157–4162, 2010

2010
[108]

Psfq: a reliable transport protocol for wireless sensor networks,

C.-Y . Wan, A. T. Campbell, and L. Krishnamurthy, “Psfq: a reliable transport protocol for wireless sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the ACM international workshop on Wireless sensor networks and applications, 2002

2002
[109]

Retransmission or redundancy: Transmission reliability in wireless sensor networks,

H. Wen, C. Lin, F. Ren, Y . Yue, and X. Huang, “Retransmission or redundancy: Transmission reliability in wireless sensor networks,” in IEEE International Conference on Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems , 2007

2007
[110]

Joint retransmis- sion, compression and channel coding for data ﬁdelity under energy constraints,

C. Pielli, C. Stefanovic, P. Popovski, and M. Zorzi, “Joint retransmis- sion, compression and channel coding for data ﬁdelity under energy constraints,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.09183 , 2017

2017 arXiv
[111]

LoRaMote user guide,

Semtech, “LoRaMote user guide,” Jul. 2014

2014
[112]

LoRa from the city to the mountains: Exploration of hard- ware and environmental factors,

O. Iova, A. Murphy, G. P. Picco, L. Ghiro, D. Molteni, F. Ossi, and F. Cagnacci, “LoRa from the city to the mountains: Exploration of hard- ware and environmental factors,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks , 2017

2017
[113]

Experimental evaluation of LoRa(W AN) in indoor and outdoor environments,

C. Hakkenberg, “Experimental evaluation of LoRa(W AN) in indoor and outdoor environments,” Master’s thesis, University of Twente, 2016

2016
[114]

Indoor deployment of low- power wide area networks (LPW AN): A LoRaW AN case study,

P. Neumann, J. Montavont, and T. No ¨el, “Indoor deployment of low- power wide area networks (LPW AN): A LoRaW AN case study,” in Proceesdings of the International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications , 2016, pp. 1–8

2016
[115]

A study of LoRa: Long range & low power networks for the Internet of Things,

A. Augustin, J. Yi, T. Clausen, and W. M. Townsley, “A study of LoRa: Long range & low power networks for the Internet of Things,” Sensors, vol. 16, no. 9, p. 1466, 2016

2016
[116]

Frdm-17510evb evaluation board user guide,

N. Semiconductors, “Frdm-17510evb evaluation board user guide,” Apr. 2017, revision 1

2017
[117]

Cisco 910 industrial router data sheet,

Cisco, “Cisco 910 industrial router data sheet,” Aug. 2017

2017
[118]

LoRaW AN speciﬁcation,

N. Sornin, M. Luis, T. Eirich, T. Kramp, and O. Hersent, “LoRaW AN speciﬁcation,” LoRa alliance, 2015

2015
[119]

Empirical formula for propagation loss in land mobile radio services,

M. Hata, “Empirical formula for propagation loss in land mobile radio services,” IEEE transactions on Vehicular Technology , vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 317–325, 1980

1980
[120]

Field strength and its variability in vhf and uhf land- mobile radio service,

Y . Okumura, “Field strength and its variability in vhf and uhf land- mobile radio service,” Rev. Electr. Commun. Lab., vol. 16, pp. 825–873, 1968

1968
[121]

Urban area radio propagation measurements at 955 and 1845 mhz for small and micro cells,

P. E. Mogensen, P. Eggers, C. Jensen, and J. B. Andersen, “Urban area radio propagation measurements at 955 and 1845 mhz for small and micro cells,” in IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference GLOBECOM’91: Countdown to the New Millennium. Conference Record. IEEE, 1991, pp. 1297–1302

1991
[122]

Scholkopf and A

B. Scholkopf and A. J. Smola, Learning with kernels: support vector machines, regularization, optimization, and beyond. MIT press, 2001

2001
[123]

LoRa transmission parameter selection,

M. Bor and U. Roedig, “LoRa transmission parameter selection,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems , 2017, pp. 5–7

2017
[124]

Range and coexistence analysis of long range unlicensed communication,

B. Reynders, W. Meert, and S. Pollin, “Range and coexistence analysis of long range unlicensed communication,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Telecommunications , 2016, pp. 1–6

2016
[125]

C. J. F. Cremers, Scyther: Semantics and veriﬁcation of security pro- tocols. Eindhoven University of Technology Eindhoven, Netherlands, 2006

2006
[126]

HIP tiny exchange (tex): A distributed key exchange scheme for HIP-based Internet of Things,

Y . B. Saied and A. Olivereau, “HIP tiny exchange (tex): A distributed key exchange scheme for HIP-based Internet of Things,” in Proceed- ings of the Third International Conference on Communications and Networking, 2012, pp. 1–8

2012
[127]

Lightweight collaborative key establishment scheme for the aInternet of Things,

Y . B. Saied, A. Olivereau, D. Zeghlache, and M. Laurent, “Lightweight collaborative key establishment scheme for the aInternet of Things,” Computer Networks, vol. 64, pp. 273–295, 2014

2014
[128]

Proxy-based end-to-end key establishment protocol for the Internet- of-Things,

P. Porambage, A. Braeken, P. Kumar, A. Gurtov, and M. Ylianttila, “Proxy-based end-to-end key establishment protocol for the Internet- of-Things,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Com- munication Workshop, 2015, pp. 2677–2682

2015
[129]

Effective key man- agement in dynamic wireless sensor networks,

S.-H. Seo, J. Won, S. Sultana, and E. Bertino, “Effective key man- agement in dynamic wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 371–383, 2015

2015
[130]

A novel key update protocol in mobile sensor networks,

S. Agrawal, R. Roman, M. L. Das, A. Mathuria, and J. Lopez, “A novel key update protocol in mobile sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems Security , 2012, pp. 194–207

2012
[131]

Blockchains and smart contracts for the Internet of Things,

K. Christidis and M. Devetsikiotis, “Blockchains and smart contracts for the Internet of Things,” IEEE Access, vol. 4, pp. 2292–2303, 2016

2016
[132]

Securing smart cities using blockchain technology,

K. Biswas and V . Muthukkumarasamy, “Securing smart cities using blockchain technology,” inProceedings of the International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications; International Conference on Smart City; International Conference on Data Science and Systems...

2016
[133]

Blockchain for IoT security and privacy: The case study of a smart home,

A. Dorri, S. S. Kanhere, R. Jurdak, and P. Gauravaram, “Blockchain for IoT security and privacy: The case study of a smart home,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, 2017, pp. 618–623

2017
[134]

Managing IoT devices using blockchain platform,

S. Huh, S. Cho, and S. Kim, “Managing IoT devices using blockchain platform,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, 2017, pp. 464–467

2017
[135]

Using blockchain to push software- deﬁned IoT components onto edge hosts,

M. Samaniego and R. Deters, “Using blockchain to push software- deﬁned IoT components onto edge hosts,” in Proceedings of the Inter- national Conference on Big Data and Advanced Wireless Technologies, 2016, p. 58

2016
[136]

Blockchain as a service for IoT,

R. D. Mayra Samaniego, “Blockchain as a service for IoT,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet of Things and Green Computing and Communications and Cyber, Physical and Social Computing and Smart Data , 2016, pp. 433–436

2016
[137]

Using blockchain technology to build trust in sharing LoRaW AN IoT,

J. Lin, Z. Shen, and C. Miao, “Using blockchain technology to build trust in sharing LoRaW AN IoT,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Crowd Science and Engineering , 2017, pp. 38–43

2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [9]

Low power wide area networks: An overview,

U. Raza, P. Kulkarni, and M. Sooriyabandara, “Low power wide area networks: An overview,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 855–873, 2017

2017

[2] [16]

A survey on LPW A technology: LoRa and NB-IoT,

R. S. Sinha, Y . Wei, and S.-H. Hwang, “A survey on LPW A technology: LoRa and NB-IoT,” ICT Express, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 14–21, 2017

2017

[3] [77]

A survey of lorawan for iot: From technology to application,

J. Haxhibeqiri, E. De Poorter, I. Moerman, and J. Hoebeke, “A survey of lorawan for iot: From technology to application,” Sensors, vol. 18, no. 11, p. 3995, 2018

work page 2018

[4] [89]

Integration of LoRaW AN and 4G/5G for the Industrial Internet of Things,

J. Navarro-Ortiz, S. Sendra, P. Ameigeiras, and J. M. Lopez-Soler, “Integration of LoRaW AN and 4G/5G for the Industrial Internet of Things,” IEEE Communications Magazine , vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 60–67, 2018

work page 2018

[5] [36]

LoRa indoor coverage and performance in an industrial environment: Case study,

J. Haxhibeqiri, A. Karaa ˘gac ¸, F. Van den Abeele, W. Joseph, I. Moer- man, and J. Hoebeke, “LoRa indoor coverage and performance in an industrial environment: Case study,” inProceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Technologies And Factory Automation, 2017, pp. 1–8

2017

[6] [21]

Do LoRa low- power wide-area networks scale?

M. C. Bor, U. Roedig, T. V oigt, and J. M. Alonso, “Do LoRa low- power wide-area networks scale?” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems, 2016, pp. 59–67

2016

[7] [1]

A survey on internet of things: Architecture, enabling technologies, security and privacy, and applications,

J. Lin, W. Yu, N. Zhang, X. Yang, H. Zhang, and W. Zhao, “A survey on internet of things: Architecture, enabling technologies, security and privacy, and applications,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 1125–1142, 2017

2017

[8] [2]

Internet of things: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications,

A. Al-Fuqaha, M. Guizani, M. Mohammadi, M. Aledhari, and M. Ayyash, “Internet of things: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutori- als, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 2347–2376, 2015

2015