Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 131 references

Many-body correlations in Floquet steady-states: Frequency-resolved renormalization group of the driven Anderson impurity

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Periodic driving of a quantum dot broadens the Kondo resonance inelastically, yet the nonlocal Kondo cloud stays largely intact, preserving a fraction of Kondo pinning even under a strong local Floquet drive.

desk verdict A genuine new Floquet-FRG method; the method claim holds up, the Kondo-cloud-robustness headline does not—both for the same reason: the truncation misses the exponential Kondo scale. read the letter →

arxiv 2603.12844 v2 pith:ELDZ73CM submitted 2026-03-13 cond-mat.str-el

Jan-Niklas Herre , Christoph Karrasch , Dante M. Kennes This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords FloquetsteadystatefunctionalrenormalizationgroupKeldyshformalismAndersonimpuritymodelKondoeffectnonequilibriumtransportdrivenquantumdotspectralfunction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces a functional renormalization group (FRG) framework formulated directly in the Floquet steady state, keeping the frequency dependence of the two-particle vertex. The authors argue that this gives controlled access to dynamical response functions and nonequilibrium transport in driven interacting systems. They benchmark it on the periodically driven single-impurity Anderson model against Floquet Green's function methods, finding quantitative agreement for finite-frequency observables up to intermediate interaction strengths. Their main physical conclusion is that a local periodic drive broadens the Kondo resonance through inelastic scattering, but the nonlocal Kondo cloud is largely unaffected, suppressing Floquet replicas of the Kondo peak and leading to a partial persistence of Kondo pinning.

What carries the argument

The central object is the frequency-dependent two-particle vertex in Floquet–Keldysh space, decomposed into particle-particle, particle-hole, and direct particle-hole channels. The flow equations for these channel vertices, together with the self-energy, are integrated using a hybridization-flow regulator and the Katanin substitution, yielding an RG-improved ladder resummation that goes beyond RPA while retaining frequency dependence—this is what enables the treatment of inelastic scattering and finite-frequency response.

What would settle it

A numerically exact computation of the driven Anderson impurity steady state (e.g., using a quantum Monte Carlo or density-matrix renormalization group simulation of the infinite-time Floquet state) at U/Δ ≈ 4–6, Ω/Δ ≈ 5, and A/Δ ≈ 5, comparing the effective mass m* and the linear conductance with the FRG predictions, and checking whether the Kondo peak's Floquet sidebands are truly absent.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

This paper claims to establish a frequency-resolved Floquet FRG scheme that retains the frequency structure of the two-particle vertex to second order in the interaction, enabling controlled access to spectral functions, effective masses, and transport in driven interacting systems. Applied to the single-impurity Anderson model with a back-gate drive, it finds that local periodic driving strongly broadens the Kondo resonance via inelastic scattering, while the many-body Kondo cloud remains largely intact. This robustness suppresses Floquet sidebands associated with the Kondo resonance and leads to a partial persistence of Kondo pinning, indicating that the nonlocal many-body singlet is resil

Load-bearing premise

The Kondo-cloud robustness conclusion relies on a one-loop channel-decomposed FRG approximation that does not capture the exponential Kondo scale in equilibrium and may overestimate the suppression of the Kondo resonance.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The method provides a tractable route to compute dynamical response functions and conductances in driven interacting impurity systems beyond static self-energy approximations.
  • Static approximations to the vertex flow (sFRG) break down at intermediate interaction strengths, but a replica-resolved static approximation (rsFRG) remains close to the fully frequency-dependent FRG for static quantities.
  • The physical result implies that local driving acts as a decoherence source that broadens the Kondo resonance, yet nonlocal Kondo correlations are more robust than the resonance itself.
  • This suggests a practical workflow for driven quantum materials: simpler static approximations may suffice for static properties, while the frequency-resolved FRG is needed for accurate dynamical properties.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the Kondo cloud is indeed left intact by local driving, nonlocal impurity-reservoir entanglement may survive even when the local resonance is strongly damped; one could test this directly by computing the impurity-reservoir spin correlation length or entanglement entropy in the driven steady state.
  • The suppression of Floquet sidebands on the Kondo peak implies that local Floquet engineering of the Kondo effect is limited by decoherence; globally driving the reservoirs or coupling to multiple reservoirs could behave differently, as the paper itself notes.
  • The exponential Kondo-scale failure of one-loop FRG suggests the magnitude of resonance suppression at large U/Δ is likely overestimated; an exact steady-state benchmark would clarify whether the partial persistence of Kondo pinning is quantitatively reliable or only qualitatively correct.
  • The replica-static approximation (rsFRG) may serve as a low-cost tool for driven lattice models where full frequency resolution is too expensive, extending the approach to extended systems.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a Floquet functional renormalization group (FRG) framework formulated directly in the Floquet steady state. The two-particle vertex is approximated by a channel-decomposed frequency-dependent form (Eq. 48), the flow is regularized by a hybridization-flow cutoff with the Katanin substitution, and the flow equations are solved numerically on a nonuniform frequency grid. The method is benchmarked against second-order perturbation theory (2PT) and self-consistent GW for the periodically driven single-impurity Anderson model, with additional tests of static approximations. The authors find agreement among the methods at weak coupling, observe drive-induced broadening of the Kondo resonance, and interpret the persistence of Kondo pinning and the absence of Floquet sidebands on the Kondo feature as evidence that the nonlocal Kondo cloud survives local periodic driving.

Significance. The methodological development is potentially valuable: a frequency-resolved Floquet FRG that retains some structure of the two-particle vertex is a nontrivial extension of earlier static-vertex approaches, and the derivation from exact FRG identities is clearly presented. The numerical implementation is detailed, includes causality checks, and appears to have been carried out with care. If the physical conclusion were quantitatively established, the result that a local drive broadens but does not destroy nonlocal Kondo correlations would be of interest to the driven-quantum-materials community. However, the central physical claim currently rests on the accuracy of a one-loop channel-decomposed approximation in precisely the regime where the paper's own equilibrium benchmark shows that this approximation fails quantitatively. The benchmark against 2PT and GW does not resolve this issue because all three methods are approximate ladder-type resummations and share uncontrolled behavior in the Kondo regime. The significance of the paper therefore hinges on a robustness claim that is plausible but not yet supported by the presented evidence.

major comments (3)
  1. [§IVC, Fig. 4, Appendix A] The headline claim that periodic driving 'leaves the many-body Kondo cloud largely intact' is not quantitatively supported by the data shown. The evidence for this claim is the effective mass m* (Fig. 4) and the zero-bias conductance (Fig. 5), both obtained from the one-loop channel-decomposed FRG of Eq. (48) without inter-channel mixing. Appendix A and Fig. 6(b) show that this class of FRG fails to reproduce the exponential equilibrium scaling m* ~ exp(U/Δ); the text itself states that 'all methods fail to capture the exponential scaling' and later concedes that 'the FRG could overestimate the suppression' of the Kondo resonance. Since the observable used to infer robustness is precisely the low-energy Kondo scale that this truncation misrepresents, the robustness statement is not established. A benchmark against a numerically exact steady-state method (e.g., the semigroup influence-mat
  2. [§IVD, Fig. 5] The term 'Kondo cloud' denotes a nonlocal many-body correlation, but no nonlocal spin-spin correlator, Kondo length, or real-space entanglement measure is computed anywhere in the manuscript. The conclusion that the cloud remains 'largely intact' is inferred from the persistence of the central conductance peak and the absence of Floquet sidebands on the Kondo feature. Local Kondo pinning alone does not establish the integrity of the nonlocal cloud; local decoherence or an effectively local broadening mechanism could produce similar transport features. The authors should either compute a genuine nonlocal correlation function or explicitly weaken the claim to the persistence of local Kondo correlations, which is what the conductance data actually support.
  3. [§IIIE, §IVC] The abstract states that the approach provides 'controlled access' to dynamical response functions and nonequilibrium transport. The benchmarking, however, is only against 2PT and GW, both of which are approximate resummations with no exact steady-state comparison; in equilibrium, the analytic benchmark of Fig. 6(b) shows that the method does not capture the Kondo scale. Thus the term 'controlled' overstates what is demonstrated. The truncation in Eq. (48) plus neglect of inter-channel mixing is a consistent approximation scheme, but its accuracy for the Kondo scale is unknown. I recommend either adding a numerically exact comparison for at least one parameter set, or tempering the 'controlled' claim to describe a systematic approximation whose quantitative accuracy is verified only in the weak-to-intermediate coupling regime.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (10)] There is a typographical error in the retarded Green's function: '⟨{cσ(t), c†σ′(t′)]}⟩' contains an unbalanced closing bracket. Please correct.
  2. [Eq. (14)] The notation δ(t′1=t′2=t1=t2) for the instantaneous vertex is nonstandard and slightly ambiguous; a standard product of delta functions would be clearer.
  3. [Fig. 6 caption] The statement that 'compared to Ref. [60] the x-axis must be scaled by a factor 1/2' is unclear. Please specify which quantity is scaled and why, or remove the remark if it is not essential.
  4. [Eq. (76), §IIIG1] The frequency-grid scale factor B=15 is described as heuristic. A brief convergence statement with respect to B would be helpful, since all frequency-resolved results depend on this choice.
  5. [Fig. 4 caption] The caption states that T_res=0.05Δ is 'still below the Kondo temperature for the shown interaction strengths.' For the largest U/Δ values, the Kondo temperature is exponentially small, so this statement may not hold; please provide the Kondo-temperature estimate used.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the FRG flow equations are derived from exact Keldysh-FRG identities, the channel decomposition is an explicit approximation rather than a concealed input, and benchmarks are independent approximate schemes; the main limitation is accuracy, not circularity.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained at the level of construction. The flow equations, Eqs. (41)-(47), follow from the standard exact FRG hierarchy (Eqs. (38)-(40)) after a stated truncation; the channel decomposition in Eq. (48) is explicitly labeled an approximation ('Following Ref. [60], we approximate the two-particle vertex as a frequency decomposition into the three "channel-native" components ... This decouples the channels and leads to an RPA-like resummation'), not a hidden definition of the target observables. No parameter is fitted to the Kondo-scale results: the self-energy and vertex flows are integrated from Hartree/RPA initial values without adjusting couplings to reproduce m* or the conductance, and the benchmarks (2PT, GW) are independent diagrammatic schemes. The 'Kondo cloud largely intact' conclusion is an interpretation of the computed absence of Floquet sidebands and partial pinning; it is not defined in terms of those outputs by construction. Appendix A and Fig. 4 do concede a quantitative limitation ('All methods fail to capture the exponential scaling', 'We expect that the FRG could overestimate the suppression'), but this concerns approximation accuracy in the Kondo regime, not circularity. There are several self-citations used for context or numerical techniques, but none supplies the load-bearing content of the central claim without independent derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No genuinely new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced. The main input assumptions are the standard Keldysh/Floquet setup plus the channel-decomposed one-loop FRG truncation and the numerical regulator choices. The B=15 grid parameter is the only hand-tuned numerical constant that could affect results without a demonstrated convergence scan.

free parameters (1)
  • Frequency-grid scale factor B in Eq. (76) = 15
    B is a heuristically chosen constant in the non-uniform frequency grid mapping omega = mu + B omega_tilde |omega_tilde| / sqrt(1 - omega_tilde^2). It is not fitted to observables, but no convergence scan in B is shown, so the results could depend on this numerical choice.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Floquet steady-state synchronization and initial product density matrix, Eqs. (7)-(8)
    The expectation values are taken at time t0 with the noninteracting product state rho0 = rho_dot (x) prod_alpha rho_res, and the Green's functions are assumed to become time-periodic with the drive period T. This excludes the possibility of metastable or non-synchronized long-time behavior.
  • domain assumption Wide-band limit for metallic reservoirs, Eqs. (34)-(35)
    The reservoir self-energies are assumed momentum-independent and obey the wide-band limit with constant hybridization gamma. This is standard for quantum-dot Anderson models but restricts quantitative applicability beyond metallic leads.
  • ad hoc to paper Channel decomposition of the vertex: Gamma approx Gamma0 + P(omegaP) + C(omegaC) + D(omegaD), Eq. (48)
    All frequency dependence of the two-particle vertex is assigned to one bosonic frequency per channel, and frequency dependencies of other arguments are dropped. This is the key approximation that makes the numerical problem tractable and is explicitly stated to limit accuracy to O(U^2).
  • ad hoc to paper One-loop truncation Gamma_{n>2}=0 and neglect of inter-channel mixing
    The infinite FRG hierarchy is truncated at the two-particle vertex and the three channels are not mixed. The paper states that static inter-channel mixing was found to produce unphysical results, and a full vertex parametrization 'stays out of reach.' This limits the method's accuracy for intermediate-to-strong interactions.
  • ad hoc to paper Katanin substitution S -> partial_Lambda G in Eq. (43)
    The single-scale propagator is replaced by the full derivative of the Green's function to improve the feedback. This is a known RG improvement, but it is an approximation to the exact flow that is not systematically controlled in the truncation.
  • ad hoc to paper Hybridization flow regulator, Eq. (64) and RPA initialization at Lambda_ini = 10
    The flow starts from an artificial reservoir with infinite hybridization and is initialized with the RPA solution at small U/Delta. While this is physically motivated and reduces cost, the choice of regulator and initialization influences the result because the truncation breaks regulator independence.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Many-body correlations in Floquet steady-states: Frequency-resolved renormalization group of the driven Anderson impurity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ELDZ73CM

@misc{pith2026260312844,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Many-body correlations in Floquet steady-states: Frequency-resolved renormalization group of the driven Anderson impurity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ELDZ73CM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.12844}
}
read the original abstract

We introduce a functional renormalization group framework formulated directly in the Floquet steady-state that systematically incorporates frequency-dependent interaction effects. By retaining the frequency structure of the two-particle vertex up to second order in interaction strength, our approach provides controlled access to dynamical response functions and nonequilibrium transport in driven, interacting systems. Using the periodically driven single-impurity Anderson model as a paradigmatic example, we benchmark our results against state-of-the-art Floquet Green's function methods and find quantitative agreement for finite-frequency observables up to intermediate interaction strengths. Remarkably, we also show that static properties are often captured reliably by much simpler approximations, suggesting practical pathways for modeling driven quantum materials. Finally, we demonstrate that although periodic driving of the dot strongly broadens the Kondo resonance through inelastic scattering, it leaves the many-body Kondo cloud largely intact. This robustness suppresses Floquet replicas of the Kondo peak and leads to a partial persistence of Kondo pinning, highlighting the resilience of emergent many-body correlations under local periodic driving.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.12844 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The different approximations to the FRG equations investigated in this work. The most elaborate scheme (FRG) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Renormalization of the time-averaged effective in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Self-energy and spectral function of the back-gate driven SIAM for different parameters. 2PT, GW, and frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Floquet engineered effective mass by driving the back [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Time averaged linear conductance as a function of gate voltage [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Real-time steady-state dynamics of the dot filling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. First Floquet component ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

131 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    channel-native

    Channel decomposition Following Ref. [60], we approximate the two-particle vertex as a frequency decomposition into the three “channel-native” components and only keep the depen- dency on the respective bosonic frequencies Γ1′2′|12 Λ (ωP , ωC, ωD)≈Γ 1′2′|12 0 +P 1′2′|12 Λ (ωP ) +C 1′2′|12 Λ (ωC) +D 1′2′|12 Λ (ωD), (48) whereΓ 0 = ΓΛ→∞ is the initial value...

  2. [2]

    Benchmarking these cheaper approxi- mations will give a good estimate of whether one can expect good results using them on extended systems, as well

    Additional approximations As we develop this framework with the goal in mind to eventually simulate extended systems and real quantum materials under Floquet driving, we also test additional approximations. Benchmarking these cheaper approxi- mations will give a good estimate of whether one can expect good results using them on extended systems, as well. ...

  3. [3]

    The extensive discussion in Ref

    Hybridization flow The truncation of the flow equations causes the choice of the regulator, which should in principle be arbi- trary, to become relevant. The extensive discussion in Ref. [59] showed that causality and grand-canonical en- semble statistics might be altered in unphysical ways if one considers, for example, sharp cutoff schemes, as it is fre...

  4. [4]

    Then, the Green’s functions reduce to a single number per Keldysh component, frequency point, and Floquet index

    Spin summation for theSU(2)-symmetric SIAM In the case of the SIAM with no external magnetic field and metallic leads, we can also solve the sum- mation over spin indices explicitly to further simplify the flow equations. Then, the Green’s functions reduce to a single number per Keldysh component, frequency point, and Floquet index. For the vertices, we k...

  5. [5]

    The SCHF approximation aims at a self-consistent solution of only the Hartree and Fock diagrams, which leads to a frequency-independent self- energy

    Self-consistent Hartree-Fock Both the 2PT and the FRG require a self-consistent Hartree-Fock (SCHF) computation as the initial value for the self-energy. The SCHF approximation aims at a self-consistent solution of only the Hartree and Fock diagrams, which leads to a frequency-independent self- energy. In Ref. [50] a Floquet FRG scheme was intro- duced th...

  6. [6]

    (55) to obtain the particle-hole susceptibility

    Bare second order perturbation theory We implement the bare 2PT by starting with a SCHF computation and subsequently dress the Green’s func- tions withΣ H to compute the non-differentiated version of Eq. (55) to obtain the particle-hole susceptibility. The vertex in 2PT is given by Eq. (59) (plugging in the full susceptibility) and setting ˆX= 0, i.e., on...

  7. [7]

    (59)-(62) without channel-mixing

    Random-phase approximation It is possible to relate the FRG flow equations to the RPA by keeping the self-energy fixed at the Hartree level and only flowing Eqs. (59)-(62) without channel-mixing. One can then solve the integral overΛanalytically to obtain the geometric series known from the ladder ap- proximation. In the particle-hole channel, this yields...

  8. [8]

    GW approximation Within the GW approximation, we enforce both self- consistency of the full frequency-dependent self-energy and incorporate screening effects by writing diagrams in- cluding the 2PT vertex instead of the bare vertex. Al- though the GW approximation as implemented here is derived from Hedin’s equations [55, 106] as a conserv- ing approximat...

Show all 131 references
  1. [9]

    stitching

    Representation of Floquet Green’s functions To obtain the Floquet Green’s function in single index form, one needs to first generate them in double index formfromEqs.(36), whichonlyrequiresknowledgeofthe Fourier coefficients of the time-dependent system Hamil- tonian. As the F...

  2. [10]

    Efficient integration of Floquet susceptibilities To compute the susceptibilities in Eqs. (55)-(58) in a memory- and compute-efficient way, we utilize the previously introduced frequency grids and extrapolation schemes to set up an adaptive quadrature routine that linearly int...

  3. [11]

    FRG” denotes the frequency-dependent FRG without inter-channel mixing that is used for the main text results. “mFRG

    Numerical parameters In order to adequately resolve all features on the real frequency axis, we set the frequency grid resolution to Nω = 201with the scale factorB= 15. In the FRG scheme, we initialize the flow atΛ ini = 10.0with the SCHF dressed RPA solution and then flow toΛ...

  4. [12]

    D. N. Basov, R. D. Averitt, and D. Hsieh, Towards prop- erties on demand in quantum materials, Nature Mate- rials16, 1077 (2017)

    2017

  5. [13]

    de la Torre, D

    A. de la Torre, D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, S. Gerber, J. W. McIver, and M. A. Sentef, Colloquium: Nonther- mal pathways to ultrafast control in quantum materials, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 041002 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    C. Bao, P. Tang, D. Sun, and S. Zhou, Light-induced emergent phenomena in 2d materials and topological materials, Nature Reviews Physics4, 33 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    Oka and H

    T. Oka and H. Aoki, Photovoltaic hall effect in graphene, Phys. Rev. B79, 081406 (2009)

    2009

  8. [16]

    J. W. McIver, B. Schulte, F.-U. Stein, T. Matsuyama, G. Jotzu, G. Meier, and A. Cavalleri, Light-induced anomalous hall effect in graphene, Nature Physics16, 38 (2019)

    2019

  9. [17]

    Oka and S

    T. Oka and S. Kitamura, Floquet engineering of quan- tum materials, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics10, 387 (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    S. A. Sato, J. W. McIver, M. Nuske, P. Tang, G. Jotzu, B. Schulte, H. Hübener, U. De Giovannini, L. Mathey, M. A. Sentef, A. Cavalleri, and A. Rubio, Microscopic theory for the light-induced anomalous hall effect in graphene, Phys. Rev. B99, 214302 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    G. E. Topp, G. Jotzu, J. W. McIver, L. Xian, A. Ru- bio, and M. A. Sentef, Topological floquet engineering of twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Res.1, 023031 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    Y. H. Wang, H. Steinberg, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and N.Gedik,Observationoffloquet-blochstatesonthesur- face of a topological insulator, Science342, 453 (2013)

    2013

  13. [21]

    G. Usaj, P. M. Perez-Piskunow, L. E. F. Foa Torres, and C. A. Balseiro, Irradiated graphene as a tunable floquet topological insulator, Phys. Rev. B90, 115423 (2014)

    2014

  14. [22]

    Rodriguez-Vega, M

    M. Rodriguez-Vega, M. Vogl, and G. A. Fiete, Low- frequency and moiré–floquet engineering: A review, An- nals of Physics435, 168434 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    M. W. Day, K. Kusyak, F. Sturm, J. I. Aranzadi, H. M. Bretscher, M. Fechner, T. Matsuyama, M. H. Michael, B. F. Schulte, X. Li, J. Hagelstein, D. Her- rmann, G. Kipp, A. M. Potts, J. M. DeStefano, C. Hu, Y. Huang, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, G. Meier, D. Shin, A. Rubio, J.-H. C...

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Merboldt, M

    M. Merboldt, M. Schüler, D. Schmitt, J. P. Bange, W. Bennecke, K. Gadge, K. Pierz, H. W. Schumacher, D. Momeni, D. Steil, S. R. Manmana, M. A. Sentef, M. Reutzel, and S. Mathias, Observation of floquet states in graphene, Nature Physics21, 1093 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    Boschini, M

    F. Boschini, M. Zonno, and A. Damascelli, Time- resolved ARPES studies of quantum materials, Reviews of Modern Physics96, 015003 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    J. H. Mentink, K. Balzer, and M. Eckstein, Ultrafast and reversible control of the exchange interaction in mott insulators, Nature Communications6(2015)

    2015

  19. [27]

    Claassen, H.-C

    M. Claassen, H.-C. Jiang, B. Moritz, and T. P. De- vereaux, Dynamical time-reversal symmetry breaking and photo-induced chiral spin liquids in frustrated Mott insulators, Nature Communications8, 1192 (2017)

    2017

  20. [28]

    Golez, M

    D. Golez, M. Eckstein, and P. Werner, Multiband nonequilibriumgw+EDMFT formalism for correlated insulators, Phys. Rev. B100, 235117 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    Sarkar, Z

    M. Sarkar, Z. Lenarcic, and D. Golez, Floquet engineer- ing of binding in doped and photo-doped mott insula- tors, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033331 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    V. L. Quito and R. Flint, Polarization as a tuning pa- rameter for floquet engineering: Magnetism in the hon- eycomb, square, and triangular mott insulators, Phys. Rev. B103, 134435 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    Stojchevska, I

    L. Stojchevska, I. Vaskivskyi, T. Mertelj, P. Kusar, D. Svetin, S. Brazovskii, and D. Mihailovic, Ultrafast SwitchingtoaStableHiddenQuantumStateinanElec- tronic Crystal, Science344, 177 (2014)

    2014

  24. [32]

    Maklar, J

    J. Maklar, J. Sarkar, S. Dong, Y. A. Gerasimenko, T. Pincelli, S. Beaulieu, P. S. Kirchmann, J. A. Sob- ota, S. Yang, D. Leuenberger, R. G. Moore, Z.-X. Shen, M. Wolf, D. Mihailovic, R. Ernstorfer, and L. Rettig, Coherent light control of a metastable hidden state, Sci- ence A...

    2023

  25. [33]

    D. R. Baykusheva, D. P. Carmichael, C. S. Weber, I.-T. Lu, F. Glerean, T. Meng, P. B. M. D. Oliveira, C. C. Homes, I. A. Zaliznyak, G. D. Gu, M. P. M. Dean, A. Rubio, D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, and M. Mi- trano, Quantum control of Hubbard excitons (2026), arXiv:2601.20695 [cond-mat]

    2026

  26. [34]

    Fausti, R

    D. Fausti, R. I. Tobey, N. Dean, S. Kaiser, A. Dienst, M. C. Hoffmann, S. Pyon, T. Takayama, H. Takagi, and A. Cavalleri, Light-Induced Superconductivity in a Stripe-Ordered Cuprate, Science331, 189 (2011)

    2011

  27. [35]

    B. Liu, M. Först, M. Fechner, D. Nicoletti, J. Porras, T. Loew, B. Keimer, and A. Cavalleri, Pump Frequency Resonances for Light-Induced Incipient Superconduc- tivity inYBa 2Cu3O6.5, Physical Review X10, 011053 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    M. A. Sentef, A. F. Kemper, A. Georges, and C. Kol- lath, Theory of light-enhanced phonon-mediated super- conductivity, Phys. Rev. B93, 144506 (2016)

    2016

  29. [37]

    D. M. Kennes, E. Y. Wilner, D. R. Reichman, and A. J. Millis, Transient superconductivity from electronic squeezing of optically pumped phonons, Nature Physics 13, 479 (2017)

    2017

  30. [38]

    D.Kennes, A.delaTorre, A.Ron, D.Hsieh,andA.Mil- lis, Floquet engineering in quantum chains, Physical Re- view Letters120, 127601 (2018)

    2018

  31. [39]

    D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, M. A. Sentef, and C. Kar- rasch, Light-inducedd-wave superconductivity through floquet-engineered fermi surfaces in cuprates, Phys. Rev. B100, 075115 (2019)

    2019

  32. [40]

    Decker, C

    K. Decker, C. Karrasch, J. Eisert, and D. Kennes, Flo- quet engineering topological many-body localized sys- tems, Physical Review Letters124, 190601 (2020)

    2020

  33. [41]

    Buzzi, D

    M. Buzzi, D. Nicoletti, M. Fechner, N. Tancogne- Dejean, M. A. Sentef, A. Georges, T. Biesner, E. Uykur, M. Dressel, A. Henderson, T. Siegrist, J. A. Schlueter, K. Miyagawa, K. Kanoda, M.-S. Nam, A. Ardavan, J. Coulthard, J. Tindall, F. Schlawin, D. Jaksch, and A. Cavalleri, P...

    2020

  34. [42]

    Takahashi, H

    Y. Takahashi, H. Miyamoto, K. Kuroki, and T. Kaneko, Floquet engineering of effective pairing interactions in a doped band insulator, Phys. Rev. B111, 125104 (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    Sheikhan and C

    A. Sheikhan and C. Kollath, Dynamically enhanced un- conventional superconducting correlations in a hubbard ladder, Phys. Rev. B102, 035163 (2020)

    2020

  36. [44]

    O. Hart, G. Goldstein, C. Chamon, and C. Castelnovo, Steady-state superconductivity in electronic materials with repulsive interactions, Phys. Rev. B100, 060508 (2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    Y. Wang, T. Shi, and C.-C. Chen, Fluctuating nature of light-enhancedd-wave superconductivity: A time- dependent variational non-gaussian exact diagonaliza- tion study, Phys. Rev. X11, 041028 (2021)

    2021

  38. [46]

    U.KumarandS.-Z.Lin,Inducingandcontrollingsuper- conductivity in the hubbard honeycomb model using an electromagnetic drive, Phys. Rev. B103, 064508 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    Dehghani, M

    H. Dehghani, M. Hafezi, and P. Ghaemi, Light-induced topological superconductivity via floquet interaction en- gineering, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 023039 (2021)

    2021

  40. [48]

    Li, C.-H

    Z.-Z. Li, C.-H. Lam, and J. Q. You, Floquet engineer- ing of long-rangep-wave superconductivity: Beyond the high-frequency limit, Phys. Rev. B96, 155438 (2017)

    2017

  41. [49]

    Ning, D.-S

    Z. Ning, D.-S. Ma, J. Zeng, D.-H. Xu, and R. Wang, Flexible control of chiral superconductivity in optically driven nodal point superconductors with antiferromag- netism, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 246606 (2024)

    2024

  42. [50]

    Sheikhan and C

    A. Sheikhan and C. Kollath, Floquet topological super- conductivity induced by chiral many-body interaction, Communications Physics5, 174 (2022)

    2022

  43. [51]

    Tsuji and H

    N. Tsuji and H. Aoki, Theory of anderson pseudospin resonance with higgs mode in superconductors, Phys. Rev. B92, 064508 (2015)

    2015

  44. [52]

    Dasari and M

    N. Dasari and M. Eckstein, Transient floquet engi- neering of superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B98, 235149 (2018)

    2018

  45. [53]

    M. A. Sentef, Light-enhanced electron-phonon coupling from nonlinear electron-phonon coupling, Phys. Rev. B 95, 205111 (2017)

    2017

  46. [54]

    M. Knap, M. Babadi, G. Refael, I. Martin, and E. Demler, Dynamical cooper pairing in nonequilib- rium electron-phonon systems, Phys. Rev. B94, 214504 (2016)

    2016

  47. [55]

    Murakami, N

    Y. Murakami, N. Tsuji, M. Eckstein, and P. Werner, Nonequilibrium steady states and transient dynamics of conventional superconductors under phonon driving, Phys. Rev. B96, 045125 (2017)

    2017

  48. [56]

    H. P. Ojeda Collado, G. Usaj, C. A. Balseiro, D. H. Zanette, and J. Lorenzana, Emergent parametric res- onances and time-crystal phases in driven bardeen- cooper-schrieffer systems, Phys. Rev. Res.3, L042023 (2021). 18

    2021

  49. [57]

    T. Kuhn, B. Sothmann, and J. Cayao, Floquet engineer- ing higgs dynamics in time-periodic superconductors, Phys. Rev. B109, 134517 (2024)

    2024

  50. [58]

    Hanson, L

    R. Hanson, L. P. Kouwenhoven, J. R. Petta, S. Tarucha, and L. M. K. Vandersypen, Spins in few-electron quan- tum dots, Rev. Mod. Phys.79, 1217 (2007)

    2007

  51. [59]

    M. F. Ludovico, L. Arrachea, M. Moskalets, and D. Sánchez, Periodic energy transport and entropy production in quantum electronics, Entropy18, 10.3390/e18110419 (2016)

    2016 doi

  52. [60]

    Haughian, H

    P. Haughian, H. H. Yap, J. Gong, and T. L. Schmidt, Chargepumpinginstronglycoupledmolecularquantum dots, Phys. Rev. B96, 195432 (2017)

    2017

  53. [61]

    A. K. Eissing, V. Meden, and D. M. Kennes, Functional renormalization group in floquet space, Phys. Rev. B 94, 245116 (2016)

    2016

  54. [62]

    A. K. Eissing, V. Meden, and D. M. Kennes, Renormal- ization in Periodically Driven Quantum Dots, Physical Review Letters116, 026801 (2016)

    2016

  55. [63]

    S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups, Physical Review Letters69, 2863 (1992)

    1992

  56. [64]

    S. R. White and A. E. Feiguin, Real-time evolution using the density matrix renormalization group, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 076401 (2004)

    2004

  57. [65]

    Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of Physics326, 96 (2011)

    U. Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of Physics326, 96 (2011)

    2011

  58. [66]

    Schlünzen, S

    N. Schlünzen, S. Hermanns, M. Scharnke, and M. Bonitz, Ultrafast dynamics of strongly correlated fermions—nonequilibrium green functions and selfen- ergy approximations, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter32, 103001 (2019)

    2019

  59. [67]

    Schüler, D

    M. Schüler, D. Golez, Y. Murakami, N. Bittner, A. Her- rmann, H.U.Strand, P.Werner,andM.Eckstein,Nessi: The non-equilibrium systems simulation package, Com- puter Physics Communications257, 107484 (2020)

    2020

  60. [68]

    H. Aoki, N. Tsuji, M. Eckstein, M. Kollar, T. Oka, and P. Werner, Nonequilibrium dynamical mean-field theory and its applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 779 (2014)

    2014

  61. [69]

    Karrasch, R

    C. Karrasch, R. Hedden, R. Peters, T. Pruschke, K. Schönhammer, and V. Meden, A finite-frequency functional renormalization group approach to the sin- gle impurity anderson model, Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter20, 345205 (2008)

    2008

  62. [70]

    Jakobs, Functional renormalization group studies of quantum transport through mesoscopic systems, PhD thesis, RWTH Aachen University (2010)

    S. Jakobs, Functional renormalization group studies of quantum transport through mesoscopic systems, PhD thesis, RWTH Aachen University (2010)

    2010

  63. [71]

    S. G. Jakobs, M. Pletyukhov, and H. Schoeller, Nonequilibrium functional renormalization group with frequency-dependent vertex function: A study of the single-impurity anderson model, Phys. Rev. B81, 195109 (2010)

    2010

  64. [72]

    D. M. Kennes, S. G. Jakobs, C. Karrasch, and V. Meden, Renormalization group approach to time- dependent transport through correlated quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B85, 085113 (2012)

    2012

  65. [73]

    Ono and S

    A. Ono and S. Ishihara, Photocontrol of magnetic struc- ture in an itinerant magnet, Phys. Rev. B98, 214408 (2018)

    2018

  66. [74]

    A.OnoandS.Ishihara,Nonequilibriumsusceptibilityin photoinduced floquet states, Phys. Rev. B100, 075127 (2019)

    2019

  67. [75]

    Klebl, D

    L. Klebl, D. M. Kennes, and C. Honerkamp, Functional renormalization group for a large moiré unit cell, Phys. Rev. B102, 085109 (2020)

    2020

  68. [76]

    J. B. Profe and D. M. Kennes, Tu2frg: a scalable ap- proach for truncated unity functional renormalization group in generic fermionic models, The European Phys- ical Journal B95(2022)

    2022

  69. [77]

    Hille, F

    C. Hille, F. B. Kugler, C. J. Eckhardt, Y.-Y. He, A. Kauch, C. Honerkamp, A. Toschi, and S. Ander- gassen, Quantitative functional renormalization group description of the two-dimensional hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033372 (2020)

    2020

  70. [78]

    A. C. Hewson,The Kondo Problem to Heavy Fermions, Cambridge Studies in Magnetism (Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 1993)

    1993

  71. [79]

    Pustilnik and L

    M. Pustilnik and L. Glazman, Kondo effect in quantum dots, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter16, R513 (2004)

    2004

  72. [80]

    Kaminski, Yu

    A. Kaminski, Yu. V. Nazarov, and L. I. Glazman, Sup- pression of the Kondo Effect in a Quantum Dot by External Irradiation, Physical Review Letters83, 384 (1999)

    1999

  73. [81]

    Kaminski, Yu

    A. Kaminski, Yu. V. Nazarov, and L. I. Glazman, Uni- versality of the Kondo effect in a quantum dot out of equilibrium, Physical Review B62, 8154 (2000)

    2000

  74. [82]

    Latta, F

    C. Latta, F. Haupt, M. Hanl, A. Weichselbaum, M. Claassen, W. Wuester, P. Fallahi, S. Faelt, L. Glaz- man, J. von Delft, H. E. Türeci, and A. Imamoglu, Quantum quench of Kondo correlations in optical ab- sorption, Nature474, 627 (2011)

    2011

  75. [83]

    H. T. M. Nghiem and T. A. Costi, Time Evolution of theKondoResonanceinResponsetoaQuench,Physical Review Letters119, 156601 (2017)

    2017

  76. [84]

    Kanász-Nagy, Y

    M. Kanász-Nagy, Y. Ashida, T. Shi, C. P. Moca, T. N. Ikeda, S. Fölling, J. I. Cirac, G. Zaránd, and E. A. Dem- ler,ExploringtheanisotropicKondomodelinandoutof equilibrium with alkaline-earth atoms, Physical Review B97, 155156 (2018)

    2018

  77. [85]

    L. E. Bruhat, J. J. Viennot, M. C. Dartiailh, M. M. Desjardins, A. Cottet, and T. Kontos, Scaling laws of the Kondo problem at finite frequency, Physical Review B98, 075121 (2018)

    2018

  78. [86]

    Krivenko, J

    I. Krivenko, J. Kleinhenz, G. Cohen, and E. Gull, Dynamics of Kondo voltage splitting after a quantum quench, Physical Review B100, 201104 (2019)

    2019

  79. [87]

    Bruch, M

    V. Bruch, M. Pletyukhov, H. Schoeller, and D. M. Kennes, Floquet renormalization group approach to the periodically driven kondo model, Phys. Rev. B106, 115440 (2022)

    2022

  80. [88]

    P. W. Anderson, Localized magnetic states in metals, Phys. Rev.124, 41 (1961)

    1961

  81. [89]

    H. R. Krishna-murthy, J. W. Wilkins, and K. G. Wil- son, Renormalization-group approach to the anderson model of dilute magnetic alloys. i. static properties for the symmetric case, Phys. Rev. B21, 1003 (1980)

    1980

  82. [90]

    H.R.Krishna-murthy, J.W.Wilkins,andK.G.Wilson, Renormalization-group approach to the anderson model of dilute magnetic alloys. ii. static properties for the asymmetric case, Phys. Rev. B21, 1044 (1980)

    1980

  83. [91]

    Peters, T

    R. Peters, T. Pruschke, and F. B. Anders, Numerical renormalization group approach to green’s functions for quantum impurity models, Phys. Rev. B74, 245114 (2006). 19

    2006

  84. [92]

    Heidrich-Meisner, A

    F. Heidrich-Meisner, A. E. Feiguin, and E. Dagotto, Real-time simulations of nonequilibrium transport in the single-impurity anderson model, Phys. Rev. B79, 235336 (2009)

    2009

  85. [93]

    A. Ge, N. Ritz, E. Walter, S. Aguirre, J. von Delft, and F. B. Kugler, Real-frequency quantum field theory applied to the single-impurity anderson model, Phys. Rev. B109, 115128 (2024)

    2024

  86. [94]

    L. V. Keldysh, Diagram Technique for Nonequilibrium Processes, Sov. Phys. JETP20, 1018 (1965)

    1965

  87. [95]

    Rammer and H

    J. Rammer and H. Smith, Quantum field-theoretical methods in transport theory of metals, Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 323 (1986)

    1986

  88. [96]

    S. G. Jakobs, M. Pletyukhov, and H. Schoeller, Proper- ties of multi-particle green’s and vertex functions within keldysh formalism, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical43, 103001 (2010)

    2010

  89. [97]

    Kamenev,Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    A. Kamenev,Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    2011

  90. [98]

    J. F. Rentrop, S. G. Jakobs, and V. Meden, Nonequilib- rium transport through a josephson quantum dot, Phys. Rev. B89, 235110 (2014)

    2014

  91. [99]

    T. D. Honeychurch and D. S. Kosov, Floquet nonequi- librium green’s functions with fluctuation-exchange ap- proximation: Application to periodically driven capaci- tively coupled quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B110, 165420 (2024)

    2024

  92. [100]

    Metzner, M

    W. Metzner, M. Salmhofer, C. Honerkamp, V. Meden, and K. Schönhammer, Functional renormalization group approach to correlated fermion systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 299 (2012)

    2012

  93. [101]

    Kopiez, L

    P. Kopiez, L. Bartosch, and F. Schütz,Introduction to the Functional Renormalization Group(Springer Berlin, 2012)

    2012

  94. [102]

    Honerkamp, D

    C. Honerkamp, D. Rohe, S. Andergassen, and T. Enss, Interaction flow method for many-fermion systems, Phys. Rev. B70, 235115 (2004)

    2004

  95. [103]

    K. G. Wilson and J. Kogut, The renormalization group and theϵexpansion, Physics Reports12, 75 (1974)

    1974

  96. [104]

    Wetterich, Exact evolution equation for the effective potential, Physics Letters B301, 90 (1993)

    C. Wetterich, Exact evolution equation for the effective potential, Physics Letters B301, 90 (1993)

    1993

  97. [105]

    Salmhofer and C

    M. Salmhofer and C. Honerkamp, Fermionic renormal- ization group flows: Technique and theory, Progress of Theoretical Physics105, 1 (2001)

    2001

  98. [106]

    A. A. Katanin, Fulfillment of ward identities in the func- tional renormalization group approach, Phys. Rev. B 70, 115109 (2004)

    2004

  99. [107]

    E. E. Salpeter and H. A. Bethe, A relativistic equation for bound-state problems, Phys. Rev.84, 1232 (1951)

    1951

  100. [108]

    R. M. Martin, L. Reining, and D. M. Ceperley, RPA and beyond: the Bethe–Salpeter equation, inInteract- ing Electrons: Theory and Computational Approaches (Cambridge University Press, 2016) p. 345–388

    2016

  101. [109]

    J. A. White, Self-consistent green functions for the an- derson impurity model, Phys. Rev. B45, 1100 (1992)

    1992

  102. [110]

    Baym and L

    G. Baym and L. P. Kadanoff, Conservation laws and correlation functions, Phys. Rev.124, 287 (1961)

    1961

  103. [111]

    Bickers and D

    N. Bickers and D. Scalapino, Conserving approxima- tions for strongly fluctuating electron systems. i. for- malism and calculational approach, Annals of Physics 193, 206 (1989)

    1989

  104. [112]

    N. E. Bickers and S. R. White, Conserving approxima- tions for strongly fluctuating electron systems. ii. nu- merical results and parquet extension, Phys. Rev. B43, 8044 (1991)

    1991

  105. [113]

    J. B. Profe, D. M. Kennes, and L. Klebl, divERGe im- plements various Exact Renormalization Group exam- ples, SciPost Phys. Codebases , 26 (2024)

    2024

  106. [114]

    Andergassen, T

    S. Andergassen, T. Enss, V. Meden, W. Metzner, U. Schollwöck, and K. Schönhammer, Functional renor- malization group for luttinger liquids with impurities, Phys. Rev. B70, 075102 (2004)

    2004

  107. [115]

    Meden, Correlation effects on electronic transport through dots and wires, inAdvances in Solid State Physics(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg,

    V. Meden, Correlation effects on electronic transport through dots and wires, inAdvances in Solid State Physics(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg,

  108. [116]

    Herre, T

    J.-N. Herre, T. Okugawa, A. Fischer, C. Karrasch, and D. M. Kennes, Floquet engineering magnetism and su- perconductivity in the square-lattice Hubbard model (2025), arXiv:2511.11798 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2025

  109. [117]

    Hedin, New method for calculating the one-particle green’s function with application to the electron-gas problem, Phys

    L. Hedin, New method for calculating the one-particle green’s function with application to the electron-gas problem, Phys. Rev.139, A796 (1965)

    1965

  110. [118]

    X.Wang, C.D.Spataru, M.S.Hybertsen,andA.J.Mil- lis, Electronic correlation in nanoscale junctions: Com- parison of the gw approximation to a numerically exact solution of the single-impurity anderson model, Phys. Rev. B77, 045119 (2008)

    2008

  111. [119]

    Shinaoka, M

    H. Shinaoka, M. Wallerberger, Y. Murakami, K. No- gaki, R. Sakurai, P. Werner, and A. Kauch, Multiscale space-time ansatz for correlation functions of quantum systems based on quantics tensor trains, Phys. Rev. X 13, 021015 (2023)

    2023

  112. [120]

    M. K. Ritter, Y. Núñez Fernández, M. Wallerberger, J. von Delft, H. Shinaoka, and X. Waintal, Quantics tensor cross interpolation for high-resolution parsimo- nious representations of multivariate functions, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 056501 (2024)

    2024

  113. [121]

    Rohshap, M

    S. Rohshap, M. K. Ritter, H. Shinaoka, J. von Delft, M. Wallerberger, and A. Kauch, Two-particle calcula- tions with quantics tensor trains: Solving the parquet equations, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 023087 (2025)

    2025

  114. [122]

    Zlatić and B

    V. Zlatić and B. Horvatić, Series expansion for the sym- metric anderson hamiltonian, Phys. Rev. B28, 6904 (1983)

    1983

  115. [123]

    Andergassen, T

    S. Andergassen, T. Enss, C. Karrasch, and V. Meden, A gentle introduction to the functional renormalization group: The kondo effect in quantum dots, inQuantum Magnetism,editedbyB.Barbara, Y.Imry, G.Sawatzky, and P. C. E. Stamp (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht,

  116. [124]

    Sonner, V

    M. Sonner, V. Link, and D. A. Abanin, Semigroup in- fluence matrices for nonequilibrium quantum impurity models, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 170402 (2025)

    2025

  117. [125]

    Tsuji, T

    N. Tsuji, T. Oka, and H. Aoki, Correlated electron sys- tems periodically driven out of equilibrium: Floquet+ DMFT formalism, Phys. Rev. B78, 235124 (2008)

    2008

  118. [126]

    Affleck and P

    I. Affleck and P. Simon, Detecting the kondo screening cloud around a quantum dot, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 2854 (2001)

    2001

  119. [127]

    E. S. Sørensen and I. Affleck, Kondo screening cloud around a quantum dot: Large-scale numerical results, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 086601 (2005)

    2005

  120. [128]

    Borda, Kondo screening cloud in a one-dimensional wire: Numerical renormalization group study, Phys

    L. Borda, Kondo screening cloud in a one-dimensional wire: Numerical renormalization group study, Phys. Rev. B75, 041307 (2007)

    2007

  121. [129]

    V. L. Quito and R. Flint, Floquet engineering mul- tichannel kondo physics, Phys. Rev. B108, 155120 20 (2023)

    2023

  122. [130]

    F. B. Kugler and J. von Delft, Multiloop functional renormalization group for general models, Phys. Rev. B97, 035162 (2018)

    2018

  123. [131]

    Klöckner, D

    C. Klöckner, D. M. Kennes, and C. Karrasch, Second- order functional renormalization group approach to quantum wires out of equilibrium, Phys. Rev. B102, 235113 (2020)

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.