Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Comparison of Integrators for Electromagnetic Particle in Cell Methods: Algorithms and Applications

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1411.0816 v1 pith:EP5TA25J submitted 2014-11-04 math.NA cs.NA

classification math.NAcs.NA
keywords differentmethodsconservationintegratorspushercellcomponentdiscuss
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we present different types of integrators for electro-magnetic particle-in-cell (PIC) methods. While the integrator is an important tool of the PIC methods, it is necessary to characterize the different conservation approaches of the integrators, e.g. symplecticity, energy- or charge-conservation. We discuss the different principles, e.g. composition, filtering, explicit and implicit ideas. While, particle in cell methods are well-studied, the combination between the different parts, i.e. pusher, solver and approximations are hardly to analyze. we concentrate on choosing the optimal pusher component, with respect to conservation and convergence behavior. We discuss oscillations of the pusher component, strong external magnetic fields and optimal conservation of energy and momentum. The algorithmic ideas are discussed and numerical experiments compare the exactness of the different schemes. An outlook to overcome the different error components is discussed in the future works.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools