Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A new upper bound for subspace codes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1703.08712 v1 pith:EPQAUKHL submitted 2017-03-25 math.CO

classification math.CO
keywords subspaceboundcodesmaximumclassificationobtainedoperatornamesize
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

It is shown that the maximum size $A_2(8,6;4)$ of a binary subspace code of packet length $v=8$, minimum subspace distance $d=4$, and constant dimension $k=4$ is at most $272$. In Finite Geometry terms, the maximum number of solids in $\operatorname{PG}(7,2)$, mutually intersecting in at most a point, is at most $272$. Previously, the best known upper bound $A_2(8,6;4)\le 289$ was implied by the Johnson bound and the maximum size $A_2(7,6;3)=17$ of partial plane spreads in $\operatorname{PG}(6,2)$. The result was obtained by combining the classification of subspace codes with parameters $(7,17,6;3)_2$ and $(7,34,5;\{3,4\})_2$ with integer linear programming techniques. The classification of $(7,33,5;\{3,4\})_2$ subspace codes is obtained as a byproduct.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools