Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Physical variability in meter-scale laboratory CO$_2$ injections in faulted geometries

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.07347 v1 pith:EPTZKKBB submitted 2023-01-18 physics.geo-ph

classification physics.geo-ph
keywords geometrieslaboratorydevelopeddifferentflowfluidflowergeologicalhistory-matched
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Carbon, capture, and storage (CCS) is an important bridging technology to combat climate change in the transition towards net-zero. The FluidFlower concept has been developed to visualize and study CO$_2$ flow and storage mechanisms in sedimentary systems in a laboratory setting. Meter-scale multiphase flow in two geological geometries, including normal faults with and without smearing, is studied. The experimental protocols developed to provide key input parameters for numerical simulations are detailed, including an evaluation of operational parameters for the FluidFlower benchmark study. Variability in CO$_2$ migration patterns for two different geometries is quantified, both between 16 repeated laboratory runs and between history-matched models and a CO$_2$ injection experiment. The predicative capability of a history-matched model is then evaluated in a different geological setting.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools