Connecting mean-field theory with dynamo simulations

Petri J. K\"apyl\"a (KIS)

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 295 references

Connecting mean-field theory with dynamo simulations

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Detailed mean-field models built from measured coefficients reproduce the large-scale dynamo mode of 3D simulations, at least qualitatively.

desk verdict A candid review that maps the state of mean-field validation—and already concedes the underdetermination that makes validation weak. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.00632 v1 pith:ER52DVYZ submitted 2025-07-01 astro-ph.SR

Petri J. Käpylä (KIS) This is my paper

classification astro-ph.SR

keywords mean-fielddynamotheoryturbulenttransportcoefficientstest-fieldmethodelectromotiveforceMHDsimulationssolarmagnetichelicityalphaeffect

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Mean-field dynamo theory explains large-scale astrophysical magnetism by replacing unresolved turbulence with transport coefficients such as the alpha effect and turbulent diffusivity. This review asks whether that description is trustworthy, and tests it against three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic simulations in which turbulence is self-consistently resolved. The central conclusion is that detailed mean-field models, built from coefficients measured from the same simulations, consistently reproduce the dominant large-scale magnetic mode at least qualitatively, even though the reconstructed turbulent electromotive force itself is typically off by a factor of about two. If true, this validates mean-field theory as a working interpretive framework for solar and stellar magnetism.

What carries the argument

The workhorse is the electromotive-force ansatz $\overline{\mathcal E}_i = \mathcal E_i^{(0)} + a_{ij}\overline B_j + b_{ijk}\,\partial \overline B_j/\partial x_k + \dots$, which assumes the turbulent electromotive force is a local, instantaneous function of the mean field and its first spatial derivatives, encoded in the tensor coefficients $a_{ij}$ ($\alpha$ effect, magnetic pumping) and $b_{ijk}$ (turbulent diffusivity, R\"adler and shear-current effects). The review traces three routes to these coefficients from simulations: the imposed-field method, multidimensional regression (moments and singular value decomposition), and the test-field method, in which auxiliary linear equations for fluctuating fields under imposed test fields are solved using the simulation's velocity field. The test-field method is the workhorse for the comparisons that carry the central claim, because it yields the full tensors and their scale dependence.

What would settle it

In the most detailed successful comparison the measured alpha tensor had to be rescaled by a factor between 1.40 and 1.525 to reproduce the DNS cycle; measuring alpha from the same simulation with an independent nonlinear test-field method and asking whether that factor falls within the measurement uncertainty would settle whether the agreement is genuine coefficient reproduction or a fitted parameter.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The review's core claim, stated in Section 7.3.4, is that detailed mean-field modeling consistently reproduces the large-scale dynamo mode of the DNS at least qualitatively. The claim carries despite two countervailing facts the review documents: the reconstructed electromotive force $\overline{\mathcal E}$ is typically less well reproduced than the field itself, with amplitudes differing from the DNS value by a factor of two, and several successful comparisons used only part of the full coefficient tensors or simplified estimates such as the first-order smoothing approximation (FOSA). The review interprets this as evidence that the dominant dynamo mode in the simulations is relatively insensitive to the fine details of the turbulent transport coefficients, while still being describable by the mean-field framework. It also notes that no current comparison includes non-locality or incoherent dynamo effects, so the demonstrated agreement is a statement about the robustness of the local approximation rather than its completeness.

Load-bearing premise

The comparison of simulation and mean-field model assumes that the electromotive force depends only on the local value of the mean magnetic field and its first spatial derivatives at the same instant, and that the coefficients extracted under that assumption truly represent the turbulence; if memory or scale-dependent effects matter, as the review shows they can, the measured coefficients may not describe the dynamics.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A mean-field model assembled from test-field or SVD coefficients will usually recover the cycle period, migration direction, and dominant symmetry of the parent DNS, so mean-field theory can serve as a diagnostic tool for understanding what a simulation's dynamo is doing.
Because models using only partial coefficients or FOSA estimates also often work, the qualitative character of a simulated dynamo is more robust than the precise values of the transport coefficients; simple mean-field models retain predictive value.
Magnetic helicity conservation, rather than algebraic alpha quenching, provides the correct saturation mechanism in closed or periodic systems, implying that boundary conditions and helicity fluxes are primary controls on how strongly large-scale fields grow.
The omission of non-local and incoherent effects in all current comparisons means the demonstrated agreement is qualitative; including memory kernels could change cycle periods or thresholds even if it leaves the dominant mode intact.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the dominant dynamo mode is as insensitive to transport details as the review suggests, then the primary role of test-field measurements may be to set the regime and qualitative coefficients, while the global structure (shear, helicity, boundary conditions) selects the mode; a reader should accordingly not treat a single matching butterfly diagram as proof that every measured coefficient is acc
The review already shows that alpha and gamma can change sign with test-field wavenumber in convection, so building a mean-field model with the memory-kernel representation of Eq. (56) and checking whether it still matches the DNS would isolate the part of the agreement that genuinely requires local transport.
The same coefficient-extraction pipeline could be applied to near-surface convection simulations to test whether negative effective magnetic pressure (NEMPI) can operate there, since the mean-field momentum equation already gives the effective pressure but convection simulations have not yet shown the instability.
A sharper extension would be to use measured coefficients from solar parameter regimes to generate predictions, not just reproductions, and compare them against the observed solar cycle, effectively turning the review's validation protocol into a forecast test.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This is a review article, not a new result, and it's a good one. The author does the field a service by organizing the messy literature on connecting mean-field theory to 3D dynamo simulations: clear taxonomy of simulation classes, a solid walk through the methods (imposed field, SVD, test field), and a careful, honest summary of what has and hasn't been reproduced. The tone is appropriately hedged throughout, and the central conclusion in Section 7.3.4 is stated with the right qualifier: mean-field models 'consistently reproduce the large-scale dynamo mode at least qualitatively.'

What struck me most is that the paper already contains the stress-test concern. The reviewer's worry was that mode-matching success might not validate the local EMF ansatz because the large-scale mode seems insensitive to the coefficients—but the author says this almost verbatim: the reconstructed EMF can differ by a factor of two, some studies get away with FOSA-level coefficients, and nonlocality is neglected everywhere, yet the large-scale fields still match. The author explicitly floats the possibility that 'the large-scale dynamo mode established in the simulations is quite insensitive to the choice of the turbulent transport coefficients.' So this review doesn't oversell the validation; it names the weakest link and leaves it open. That's honest and useful.

Soft spots: it leans heavily on the author's own group's work—not a balanced survey of all contributors. The review also doesn't resolve the underdetermination it identifies; it just documents it. But for a review, that's fine. The novelty is low, as expected, and the significance is moderate: it consolidates the state of the art without pointing to a clear path forward.

Who is it for? Graduate students and researchers wanting a map of the field. It deserves serious peer review—the accuracy of the survey matters, and the author is well-positioned to write it. I'd cite it as a reference for the current status of mean-field validation, and I'd probably bring it to a reading group focused on dynamo theory.

Recommendation: engage with it. It's a trustworthy review, even if it doesn't break new ground.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review article by P. J. Käpylä that surveys the connections between mean-field dynamo theory and three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic dynamo simulations. After summarizing relevant solar observations and classifying simulations into forced (Class 1), local instability-driven (Class 2), and global spherical-shell (Class 3) models, the review discusses analytic closures (FOSA, MTA, Lagrangian methods), nonlinear quenching, and magnetic helicity conservation. It then describes methods for extracting turbulent transport coefficients from simulations: imposed-field methods, regression and singular-value-decomposition fits, and quasi-kinematic and nonlinear test-field methods. The core of the review, Section 7, compares DNS results with mean-field models for each class, culminating in Section 7.3.4 in the claim that 'detailed mean-field modeling consistently reproduces the large-scale dynamo mode of the DNS at least qualitatively'. The review closes with outstanding issues (self-consistent large-scale flows, nonlinearity and non-locality) and conclusions about the interpretive value of mean-field theory.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the review would provide an important service to the dynamo community: it would show that mean-field models built from measured turbulent transport coefficients can capture the dominant large-scale magnetic modes of current three-dimensional simulations, thereby supporting mean-field theory as a useful interpretive framework for solar and stellar magnetism. The manuscript is particularly valuable as a systematic, methodologically oriented synthesis of a large and fragmented literature. It makes explicit the three-level hierarchy of comparisons (coefficient measurement, qualitative interpretation, and quantitative mean-field modeling), which is a useful organizing principle. The paper is also commendably candid about its own limitations, acknowledging the locality approximation, the ad hoc alpha rescaling in the Warnecke et al. (2021) comparison, the factor-of-two mismatch in reconstructed EMF amplitudes, and the absence of non-locality in all current comparisons. Those caveats are presented in the text, which strengthens the credibility of the review even though, as argued below, they are not fully integrated into the central conclusion.

major comments (3)

[Section 7.3.4 and Section 8.2] The central positive conclusion that detailed mean-field modeling reproduces the large-scale dynamo mode of DNS is underdetermined by the evidence the review itself presents. Section 7.3.4 notes that reconstructed EMF amplitudes can differ from the actual EMF by a factor of two (Viviani et al. 2019), that the Warnecke et al. (2021) reproduction required scaling the alpha tensor by a factor of 1.40-1.525, and that studies using partial or FOSA-level coefficients (Dube and Charbonneau 2013; Masada and Sano 2014) also recover the large-scale fields. Section 8.2 further states that none of the current comparisons include non-locality, yet mean-field models capture simulations 'remarkably well'. These facts jointly suggest that the large-scale dynamo mode is insensitive to the detailed form of the turbulent transport coefficients, meaning that agreement of a mean-field model does not discriminate between a correct and an incorrect turbulent-induction representation. The review should explicitly formulate this underdetermination as a limitation of the validation claim and propose concrete sensitivity tests (for example, perturbing the measured coefficients and checking whether the large-scale mode survives) that could separate 'mode insensitivity' from 'coefficient accuracy'. As written, the conclusion in Section 9 that the reproduction is 'remarkable' overstates what the evidence supports.
[Section 8.2 and Eq. (19)] The locality/instantaneity assumption behind Eq. (19) is load-bearing for the central claim, and the review's own evidence undermines it. Figure 14 shows that in stratified convection the transport coefficients alpha and gamma can change sign as a function of test-field wavenumber, directly indicating strong scale dependence (non-locality) of the EMF ansatz. Section 8.2 concedes that no current comparison takes non-locality into account. If the local ansatz is invalid in these convection-driven cases, then the measured coefficients and the mean-field models built from them may not describe the actual dynamics of the simulations, even if they happen to reproduce the dominant mode. The review should either qualify the central conclusion to say that mean-field models reproduce the large-scale mode without validating the local EMF representation, or provide a dedicated discussion of why the reproduction can be meaningful despite this failure. Merely listing non-locality under 'outstanding issues' is insufficient given the weight placed on Section 7.3.4.
[Section 6.3.2 (compressible test-field method)] The compressible test-field method relies on the approximation b(mr) ~ b(0) + b(B) in the main run, as stated in Section 6.3.2. The review correctly identifies this as 'not fully rigorous', but then uses results obtained with this method (e.g. the shear-current effect conclusions in Section 7.1.3) as evidence. Since this approximation is part of the chain linking measured coefficients to the EMF, its status should be flagged as a formal limitation in the assessments of those results. The review does flag it, but only in passing; given that the quasi-kinematic test-field method is also formally inapplicable when a small-scale dynamo is present, the uncertainty in coefficient extraction in the nonlinear regime deserves a more prominent place in the evaluation of the comparisons discussed in Section 7.

minor comments (4)

[Section 3, first paragraph] There is a typo: 'Navies–Stokes equations' should be 'Navier–Stokes equations'.
[Section 7.3.4, last paragraph] The word 'signifigance' should be spelled 'significance'.
[Figure 21 caption and Section 7.2] The notation for the dynamo number is inconsistent: the text uses C_alpha with critical value C_crit_alpha = 1, while the footnote introduces c_alpha with a different normalization. This should be unified to avoid confusion.
[Section 4.2, page 25] The phrase 'Models with just alpha quenching can still considered partly kinematic' is missing the verb 'be'; it should read 'can still be considered partly kinematic'.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Same-DNS coefficient return and a hand-scaled alpha make the headline 'reproduction' a partially circular consistency check, not an independent validation.

fitted input called prediction [Section 7.3.4, first paragraph]
"The most rigorous test of the turbulent transport coefficients extracted from simulations is to use them in a mean-field model corresponding to the simulation where they were extracted from."

The coefficients are not independent inputs: they are extracted from the same DNS whose large-scale mode is then the target of the mean-field model. Agreement therefore demonstrates internal consistency of the extraction/model loop rather than an out-of-sample prediction. The review's own criterion in Section 5 is that the coefficients also reproduce the DNS EMF; Viviani et al. (2019) is cited as failing by a factor of two to three, so the mode match is not tied to an accurate EMF representation.
fitted input called prediction [Section 7.3.4, Warnecke et al. (2021) discussion]
"The mean-field model reproduces large-scale features such as the cycle period and both the poleward and equatorward migration of the magnetic field in the direct simulation when the magnitude of alpha tensor was scaled up by a factor that varies between 1.40 and 1.525."

The claimed reproduction is obtained only after multiplying the measured alpha tensor by a hand-tuned factor. The agreement is thus partly manufactured by the rescaling, not delivered by the measured transport coefficients alone; a fitted adjustment is being presented as confirmation of the model. The review even notes that other studies with FOSA-level coefficients recover the same large-scale fields, reinforcing that the match is insensitive to, rather than diagnostic of, the fitted coefficients.

full rationale

This is a review, not a derivation, so no theorem is being derived from its own conclusion. The circularity burden is moderate and comes from the validation loop: turbulent transport coefficients are measured from a DNS and then inserted into a mean-field model of that same DNS, with the large-scale mode of the DNS as the target. Under the rubric, that is a fitted input called a prediction rather than a formal self-derivation. The review compounds this by reporting that reconstructed EMFs disagree with the actual EMF by a factor of two to three, and that Warnecke et al. (2021) needed a 1.40-1.525 rescaling of alpha before the mode was reproduced. Both facts show that the headline 'reproduction' is at least partly produced by the fitting process. Importantly, the review itself draws the honest consequence: the large-scale dynamo mode may be quite insensitive to the transport coefficients, and none of the comparisons include non-locality. Because the paper explicitly flags this underdetermination rather than hiding it, the partial circularity is not severe. The many self-citations are numerical and empirical results from earlier papers and are not used as an external uniqueness theorem, so they do not raise the score further. Overall score 4 reflects a central claim that is not formal circularity but is substantially weakened by same-DNS fitting and hand-scaling of the key coefficient.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim does not rest on new physics invented here. It rests on standard mean-field closure assumptions, on the validity of coefficient-extraction methods, and on the transferability of coefficients extracted from saturated DNS to linear mean-field models. The review itself flags the last two as uncertain. Free parameters enter mainly in the reviewed mean-field comparisons, notably the alpha rescaling in Warnecke et al. (2021) and assumed profiles for diffusivity and meridional flow.

free parameters (3)

alpha scaling factor (sigma_alpha) = 1.40 to 1.525
Applied to the measured alpha tensor in Warnecke et al. (2021) so a linear mean-field model reproduces the DNS cycle period and migration direction; this is an explicit tunable rescaling of the extracted coefficient.
isotropic turbulent diffusivity eta_t = 10^8 m^2/s in Kapyla et al. (2006b); scalar in Simard et al. (2013)
Used as a uniform assumed value in solar mean-field models rather than measured from the target simulation; the review treats this as a simplifying free input.
meridional flow profile = generic single-cell per hemisphere
Adopted in Simard et al. (2013) and Beaudoin et al. (2016) mean-field models instead of the DNS mean flow; this affects whether the mean-field model matches the simulation.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Reynolds averaging rules and the first-order local, instantaneous EMF expansion (Eq. 19) are valid for the simulations being compared.
Sect. 4 Eq. (19); the review itself notes the ansatz fails when scale separation is poor, with convective coefficients changing sign with test-field wavenumber (Sect. 6.3.1, Fig. 14).
domain assumption Quasi-kinematic test-field methods are applicable when no small-scale dynamo is present.
Sect. 6.3.1 states this formal restriction; many quoted coefficient measurements use this flavor, so results may not carry over when small-scale dynamos are excited.
ad hoc to paper In the compressible test-field method, the small-scale field of the main run is approximated as b(mr) = b(0) + b(B).
Sect. 6.3.2; this closure is not rigorous and is assumed accurate only when the actual mean field and test fields are similar.
domain assumption Transport coefficients extracted from saturated, magnetized simulations can be used as time-independent inputs to linear mean-field models.
Sect. 8.2 notes this is often implicit and that quenched coefficients are likely specific to the magnetic configuration from which they were extracted.
domain assumption The review scope is limited to simulations that already produce an identifiable large-scale magnetic field.
Sect. 3.2: the discussion deliberately excludes failed large-scale dynamos, so the review's positive conclusions may not generalize to marginal or unsuccessful cases.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Connecting mean-field theory with dynamo simulations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ER52DVYZ

@misc{pith2026250700632,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Connecting mean-field theory with dynamo simulations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ER52DVYZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.00632}
}

read the original abstract

Mean-field dynamo theory, describing the evolution of large-scale magnetic fields, has been the mainstay of theoretical interpretation of magnetism in astrophysical objects such as the Sun for several decades. More recently, three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic simulations have reached a level of fidelity where they capture dynamo action self-consistently on local and global scales without resorting to parametrization of unresolved scales. Recent global simulations also capture many of the observed characteristics of solar and stellar large-scale magnetic fields and cycles. Successful explanation of the results of such simulations with corresponding mean-field models is a crucial validation step for mean-field dynamo theory. Here the connections between mean-field theory and current dynamo simulations are reviewed. These connections range from the numerical computation of turbulent transport coefficients to mean-field models of simulations, and their relevance to the solar dynamo. Finally, the most notable successes and current challenges in mean-field theoretical interpretations of simulations are summarized.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

295 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

[1]

Living Rev Sol Phys 17(1):1

Arlt R, Vaquero JM (2020) Historical sunspot records . Living Rev Sol Phys 17(1):1. doi:10.1007/s41116-020-0023-y

doi:10.1007/s41116-020-0023-y 2020
[2]

Augustson K, Brun AS, Miesch M, Toomre J (2015) Grand Minima and Equatorward Propagation in a Cycling Stellar Convective Dynamo . 809:149. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/809/2/149. https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.6547 arXiv:1410.6547 [astro-ph.SR]

arXiv 2015
[3]

Balbus SA, Hawley JF (1991) A Powerful Local Shear Instability in Weakly Magnetized Disks. I. Linear Analysis . 376:214. doi:10.1086/170270

doi:10.1086/170270 1991
[4]

Physics of Plasmas 6(1):89--99

Balsara D, Pouquet A (1999) The formation of large-scale structures in supersonic magnetohydrodynamic flows . Physics of Plasmas 6(1):89--99. doi:10.1063/1.873263

work page doi:10.1063/1.873263 1999
[5]

a pyl \"a MJ, K \

Barekat A, K \"a pyl \"a MJ, K \"a pyl \"a PJ, Gilson EP, Ji H (2021) Generation of mean flows in rotating anisotropic turbulence: The case of solar near-surface shear layer . 655:A79. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202040052. https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.06343 arXiv:2012.06343 [astro-ph.SR]

arXiv 2021
[6]

AN 308:89--100

Baryshnikova I, Shukurov A (1987) Oscillatory alpha-squared dynamo - Numerical investigation . AN 308:89--100

1987
[7]

826(2):138

Beaudoin P, Simard C, Cossette JF, Charbonneau P (2016) Double Dynamo Signatures in a Global MHD Simulation and Mean-field Dynamos . 826(2):138. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/138

work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/826/2/138 2016
[8]

Astron Nachr 336(10):991

Bendre A, Gressel O, Elstner D (2015) Dynamo saturation in direct simulations of the multi-phase turbulent interstellar medium . Astron Nachr 336(10):991. doi:10.1002/asna.201512211. https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.04178 arXiv:1510.04178 [astro-ph.GA]

arXiv 2015

Show all 295 references

[9]

Living Rev Sol Phys 2:8

Berdyugina SV (2005) Starspots: A Key to the Stellar Dynamo . Living Rev Sol Phys 2:8. doi:10.12942/lrsp-2005-8

2005 doi
[10]

Bhattacharjee A, Yuan Y (1995) Self-Consistency Constraints on the Dynamo Mechanism . 449:739. doi:10.1086/176094

1995 doi
[11]

947(1):36

Bice CP, Toomre J (2023) Nature of Intense Magnetism and Differential Rotation in Convective Dynamos of M-dwarf Stars with Tachoclines . 947(1):36. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acac78

2023 doi
[12]

U ber den Ursprung der Magnetfelder auf Sternen und im interstellaren Raum (miteinem Anhang von A. Schl \

Biermann L (1950) \"U ber den Ursprung der Magnetfelder auf Sternen und im interstellaren Raum (miteinem Anhang von A. Schl \"u ter) . Z Naturforsch A 5:65

1950
[13]

Science Advances 2:e1600557--e1600557

Birch AC, Schunker H, Braun DC, Cameron R, Gizon L, L\"optien B, Rempel M (2016) A low upper limit on the subsurface rise speed of solar active regions . Science Advances 2:e1600557--e1600557. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1600557. https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.05250 arXiv:1607.05250 [astro-ph.SR]

2016 arXiv
[14]

Physics of Fluids 36(11):117136

Birch AC, Proxauf B, Duvall TL, Gizon L, Hanasoge S, Hindman BW, Sreenivasan KR (2024) Solar convective velocities: Updated helioseismic constraints . Physics of Fluids 36(11):117136. doi:10.1063/5.0216728

2024 doi
[15]

534(2):984--988

Blackman EG, Field GB (2000) Constraints on the Magnitude of in Dynamo Theory . 534(2):984--988. doi:10.1086/308767. https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9903384 arXiv:astro-ph/9903384 [astro-ph]

2000 arXiv
[16]

Physical Review Letters 89(26):265007

Blackman EG, Field GB (2002) New Dynamical Mean-Field Dynamo Theory and Closure Approach . Physical Review Letters 89(26):265007. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.265007. https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0207435 astro-ph/0207435

2002 arXiv
[17]

Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn 79(1):1--97

Braginsky SI, Roberts PH (1995) Equations governing convection in earth's core and the geodynamo . Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn 79(1):1--97. doi:10.1080/03091929508228992

1995 doi
[18]

550:824--840

Brandenburg A (2001) The Inverse Cascade and Nonlinear Alpha-Effect in Simulations of Isotropic Helical Hydromagnetic Turbulence . 550:824--840. doi:10.1086/319783. https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:astro-ph/0006186 arXiv:astro-ph/0006186

2001 arXiv
[19]

625:539--547

Brandenburg A (2005 a ) The case for a distributed solar dynamo shaped by near-surface shear . 625:539--547. doi:10.1086/429584. https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:astro-ph/0502275 arXiv:astro-ph/0502275

2005 arXiv
[20]

Astron Nachr 326(9):787--797

Brandenburg A (2005 b ) Turbulence and its parameterization in accretion discs . Astron Nachr 326(9):787--797. doi:10.1002/asna.200510414. https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0510015 arXiv:astro-ph/0510015 [astro-ph]

2005 arXiv
[21]

Astron Nachr 329(7):725

Brandenburg A (2008) The dual role of shear in large-scale dynamos . Astron Nachr 329(7):725. doi:10.1002/asna.200811027. https://arxiv.org/abs/0808.0959 arXiv:0808.0959 [astro-ph]

2008 arXiv
[22]

Brandenburg A (2016) Stellar mixing length theory with entropy rain . 832:6. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/832/1/6. https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.03189 arXiv:1504.03189 [astro-ph.SR]

2016 arXiv
[23]

598:A117

Brandenburg A (2017) Analytic solution of an oscillatory migratory ^ 2 stellar dynamo . 598:A117. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201630033. https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.02671 arXiv:1611.02671 [astro-ph.SR]

2017 arXiv
[24]

Journal of Plasma Physics 84(4):735840404

Brandenburg A (2018 a ) Advances in mean-field dynamo theory and applications to astrophysical turbulence . Journal of Plasma Physics 84(4):735840404. doi:10.1017/S0022377818000806. https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.05384 arXiv:1801.05384 [physics.flu-dyn]

2018 arXiv
[25]

Astron Nachr 339(631):631--640

Brandenburg A (2018 b ) Magnetic helicity and fluxes in an inhomogeneous ^ 2 dynamo . Astron Nachr 339(631):631--640. doi:10.1002/asna.201913604

2018 doi
[26]

Astron Nachr 339:118--126

Brandenburg A, Chatterjee P (2018) Strong nonlocality variations in a spherical mean-field dynamo . Astron Nachr 339:118--126. doi:10.1002/asna.201813472. https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.04231 arXiv:1802.04231 [astro-ph.SR]

2018 arXiv
[27]

369:329--338

Brandenburg A, Dobler W (2001) Large scale dynamos with helicity loss through boundaries . 369:329--338. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20010123. https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0012472 astro-ph/0012472

2001 arXiv
[28]

Astron Nachr 323:411--416

Brandenburg A, Dobler W (2002) Solar and stellar dynamos - latest developments . Astron Nachr 323:411--416. doi:10.1002/1521-3994(200208)323:3/4<411::AID-ASNA411>3.0.CO;2-H. https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0207393 arXiv:astro-ph/0207393 [astro-ph]

2002 arXiv
[29]

New Journal of Physics 9(8):305

Brandenburg A, K \"a pyl \"a PJ (2007) Magnetic helicity effects in astrophysical and laboratory dynamos . New Journal of Physics 9(8):305. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/8/305. https://arxiv.org/abs/0705.3507 arXiv:0705.3507 [astro-ph]

2007 arXiv
[31]

Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dynam 96:319--344

Brandenburg A, Sokoloff D (2002) Local and Nonlocal Magnetic Diffusion and Alpha-Effect Tensors in Shear Flow Turbulence . Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dynam 96:319--344. doi:10.1080/03091920290032974. https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0111568 astro-ph/0111568

2002 arXiv
[32]

417:1--209

Brandenburg A, Subramanian K (2005 a ) Astrophysical magnetic fields and nonlinear dynamo theory . 417:1--209. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.06.005. https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0405052 astro-ph/0405052

2005 arXiv
[33]

439:835--843

Brandenburg A, Subramanian K (2005 b ) Minimal tau approximation and simulations of the alpha effect . 439:835--843. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053221. https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0504222 astro-ph/0504222

2005 arXiv
[34]

Astron Nachr 326(6):400--408

Brandenburg A, Subramanian K (2005 c ) Strong mean field dynamos require supercritical helicity fluxes . Astron Nachr 326(6):400--408. doi:10.1002/asna.200510362. https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0505457 arXiv:astro-ph/0505457 [astro-ph]

2005 arXiv
[35]

In: Finnish Astronomical Society

Brandenburg A, Nordlund A , Pulkkinen P, Stein RF, Tuominen I (1990 a ) Turbulent diffusivities derived from simulations. In: Finnish Astronomical Society. pp 1--4

1990
[36]

232:277--291

Brandenburg A, Tuominen I, Nordlund A, Pulkkinen P, Stein RF (1990 b ) 3-D simulation of turbulent cyclonic magneto-convection . 232:277--291

1990
[37]

265:328--344

Brandenburg A, Moss D, Tuominen I (1992) Stratification and thermodynamics in mean-field dynamos . 265:328--344

1992
[38]

Brandenburg A, Nordlund A, Stein RF, Torkelsson U (1995) Dynamo-generated Turbulence and Large-Scale Magnetic Fields in a Keplerian Shear Flow . 446:741. doi:10.1086/175831

1995 doi
[39]

J Fluid Mech 306:325--352

Brandenburg A, Jennings RL, Nordlund , Rieutord M, Stein RF, Tuominen I (1996) Magnetic structures in a dynamo simulation . J Fluid Mech 306:325--352. doi:10.1017/S0022112096001322

1996 doi
[40]

Astron Nachr 323(2):99--122

Brandenburg A, Dobler W, Subramanian K (2002) Magnetic helicity in stellar dynamos: new numerical experiments . Astron Nachr 323(2):99--122. doi:10.1002/1521-3994(200207)323:2<99::AID-ASNA99>3.0.CO;2-B. https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0111567 arXiv:astro-ph/0111567 [astro-ph]

2002 arXiv
[41]

a dler KH, Rheinhardt M, K \

Brandenburg A, R \"a dler KH, Rheinhardt M, K \"a pyl \"a PJ (2008 a ) Magnetic Diffusivity Tensor and Dynamo Effects in Rotating and Shearing Turbulence . 676:740--751. doi:10.1086/527373. https://arxiv.org/abs/0710.4059 arXiv:0710.4059

2008 arXiv
[42]

Brandenburg A, R \"a dler KH, Rheinhardt M, Subramanian K (2008 b ) Magnetic Quenching of and Diffusivity Tensors in Helical Turbulence . 687:L49. doi:10.1086/593146. https://arxiv.org/abs/0805.1287 arXiv:0805.1287

2008 arXiv
[43]

482:739--746

Brandenburg A, R \"a dler KH, Schrinner M (2008 c ) Scale dependence of alpha effect and turbulent diffusivity . 482:739--746. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200809365. https://arxiv.org/abs/0801.1320 arXiv:0801.1320

2008 arXiv
[45]

AN 331:5

Brandenburg A, Kleeorin N, Rogachevskii I (2010) Large-scale magnetic flux concentrations from turbulent stresses . AN 331:5. doi:10.1002/asna.200911311. https://arxiv.org/abs/0910.1835 arXiv:0910.1835 [astro-ph.SR]

2010 arXiv
[46]

Brandenburg A, Kemel K, Kleeorin N, Mitra D, Rogachevskii I (2011) Detection of Negative Effective Magnetic Pressure Instability in Turbulence Simulations . 740:L50. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/740/2/L50. https://arxiv.org/abs/1109.1270 arXiv:1109.1270 [astro-ph.SR]

2011 arXiv
[47]

Brandenburg A, Kemel K, Kleeorin N, Rogachevskii I (2012 a ) The Negative Effective Magnetic Pressure in Stratified Forced Turbulence . 749:179. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/749/2/179. https://arxiv.org/abs/1005.5700 arXiv:1005.5700 [astro-ph.SR]

2012 arXiv
[48]

Brandenburg A, R \"a dler KH, Kemel K (2012 b ) Mean-field transport in stratified and/or rotating turbulence . 539:A35. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117871. https://arxiv.org/abs/1108.2264 arXiv:1108.2264 [astro-ph.SR]

2012 arXiv
[49]

Brandenburg A, Gressel O, K \"a pyl \"a PJ, Kleeorin N, Mantere MJ, Rogachevskii I (2013 a ) New Scaling for the Alpha Effect in Slowly Rotating Turbulence . 762:127. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/762/2/127. https://arxiv.org/abs/1208.5004 arXiv:1208.5004 [astro-ph.SR]

2013 arXiv
[50]

Brandenburg A, Kleeorin N, Rogachevskii I (2013 b ) Self-assembly of Shallow Magnetic Spots through Strongly Stratified Turbulence . 776:L23. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/776/2/L23. https://arxiv.org/abs/1306.4915 arXiv:1306.4915 [astro-ph.SR]

2013 arXiv
[51]

845(1):79

Brandenburg A, Mathur S, Metcalfe TS (2017 a ) Evolution of Co-existing Long and Short Period Stellar Activity Cycles . 845(1):79. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa7cfa. https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.09009 arXiv:1704.09009 [astro-ph.SR]

2017 arXiv
[52]

Astron Nachr 338(7):790--793

Brandenburg A, Schober J, Rogachevskii I (2017 b ) The contribution of kinetic helicity to turbulent magnetic diffusivity . Astron Nachr 338(7):790--793. doi:10.1002/asna.201713384. https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03421 arXiv:1706.03421 [physics.flu-dyn]

2017 arXiv
[53]

219(7):55

Brandenburg A, Elstner D, Masada Y, Pipin V (2023) Turbulent Processes and Mean-Field Dynamo . 219(7):55. doi:10.1007/s11214-023-00999-3. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.12425 arXiv:2303.12425 [astro-ph.SR]

2023 arXiv
[54]

984(1):88

Brandenburg A, K \"a pyl \"a PJ, Rogachevskii I, Yokoi N (2025) Helicity Effect on Turbulent Passive and Active Scalar Diffusivities . 984(1):88. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc691. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.08879 arXiv:2501.08879 [physics.flu-dyn]

2025 arXiv
[55]

Brown BP, Miesch MS, Browning MK, Brun AS, Toomre J (2011) Magnetic Cycles in a Convective Dynamo Simulation of a Young Solar-type Star . 731:69. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/731/1/69. https://arxiv.org/abs/1102.1993 arXiv:1102.1993 [astro-ph.SR]

2011 arXiv
[56]

Liv Rev Sol Phys 14:4

Brun AS, Browning MK (2017) Magnetism, dynamo action and the solar-stellar connection . Liv Rev Sol Phys 14:4. doi:10.1007/s41116-017-0007-8

2017 doi
[57]

570:865--885

Brun AS, Toomre J (2002) Turbulent Convection under the Influence of Rotation: Sustaining a Strong Differential Rotation . 570:865--885. doi:10.1086/339228. https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0206196 astro-ph/0206196

2002 arXiv
[58]

614:1073--1098

Brun AS, Miesch MS, Toomre J (2004) Global-Scale Turbulent Convection and Magnetic Dynamo Action in the Solar Envelope . 614:1073--1098. doi:10.1086/423835. https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:astro-ph/0610073 arXiv:astro-ph/0610073

2004 arXiv
[59]

Brun AS, Strugarek A, Varela J, Matt SP, Augustson KC, Emeriau C, DoCao OL, Brown B, Toomre J (2017) On Differential Rotation and Overshooting in Solar-like Stars . 836:192. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa5c40. https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.06598 arXiv:1702.06598 [astro-ph.SR]

2017 arXiv
[60]

926(1):21

Brun AS, Strugarek A, Noraz Q, Perri B, Varela J, Augustson K, Charbonneau P, Toomre J (2022) Powering Stellar Magnetism: Energy Transfers in Cyclic Dynamos of Sun-like Stars . 926(1):21. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac469b. https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.13218 arXiv:2201.13218 [astro-ph.SR]

2022
[61]

a pyl \"a PJ, Masada Y, Brandenburg A, Favier B, Guervilly C, K \

Bushby PJ, K \"a pyl \"a PJ, Masada Y, Brandenburg A, Favier B, Guervilly C, K \"a pyl \"a MJ (2018) Large-scale dynamos in rapidly rotating plane layer convection . 612:A97. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732066. https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.03174 arXiv:1710.03174 [astro-ph.SR]

2018 arXiv
[62]

Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dynam 100:341--361

Busse FH, Simitev RD (2006) Parameter dependences of convection-driven dynamos in rotating spherical fluid shells . Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dynam 100:341--361. doi:10.1080/03091920600784873. https://arxiv.org/abs/0904.4293 arXiv:0904.4293 [physics.flu-dyn]

2006 arXiv
[63]

87(4):043104

Candelaresi S, Brandenburg A (2013) Kinetic helicity needed to drive large-scale dynamos . 87(4):043104. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.87.043104. https://arxiv.org/abs/1208.4529 arXiv:1208.4529 [astro-ph.SR]

2013 arXiv
[64]

515:L39--L42

Cattaneo F (1999) On the Origin of Magnetic Fields in the Quiet Photosphere . 515:L39--L42. doi:10.1086/311962

1999 doi
[65]

Cattaneo F, Hughes DW (1996) Nonlinear saturation of the turbulent effect . 54:4532. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.54.R4532

1996 doi
[66]

J Fluid Mech 553:401--418

Cattaneo F, Hughes DW (2006) Dynamo action in a rotating convective layer . J Fluid Mech 553:401--418. doi:10.1017/S0022112006009165

2006 doi
[67]

789(1):70

Cattaneo F, Tobias SM (2014) On Large-scale Dynamo Action at High Magnetic Reynolds Number . 789(1):70. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/789/1/70. https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.3071 arXiv:1405.3071 [astro-ph.SR]

2014 arXiv
[68]

376:L21--L24

Cattaneo F, Vainshtein SI (1991) Suppression of turbulent transport by a weak magnetic field . 376:L21--L24. doi:10.1086/186093

1991 doi
[69]

Astron Nachr 328:1059

Chan KL (2007) Rotating convection in f-boxes: Faster rotation . Astron Nachr 328:1059. doi:10.1002/asna.200710837

2007 doi
[70]

Earth and Planetary Science Letters 371:212--219

Chan KL, Mayr HG (2013) Numerical simulation of convectively generated vortices: Application to the Jovian planets . Earth and Planetary Science Letters 371:212--219. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2013.03.046

2013 doi
[71]

Living Rev Sol Phys 17(1):4

Charbonneau P (2020) Dynamo models of the solar cycle . Living Rev Sol Phys 17(1):4. doi:10.1007/s41116-020-00025-6

2020 doi
[72]

219(5):35

Charbonneau P, Sokoloff D (2023) Evolution of Solar and Stellar Dynamo Theory . 219(5):35. doi:10.1007/s11214-023-00980-0. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.16553 arXiv:2305.16553 [astro-ph.SR]

2023 arXiv
[73]

427:1019--1030

Chatterjee P, Nandy D, Choudhuri AR (2004) Full-sphere simulations of a circulation-dominated solar dynamo: Exploring the parity issue . 427:1019--1030. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041199. https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:astro-ph/0405027 arXiv:astro-ph/0405027

2004 arXiv
[74]

Chatterjee P, Mitra D, Rheinhardt M, Brandenburg A (2011) Alpha effect due to buoyancy instability of a magnetic layer . 534:A46. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201016108. https://arxiv.org/abs/1011.1218 arXiv:1011.1218 [astro-ph.SR]

2011 arXiv
[75]

J Fluid Mech 470(1):115--133

Christensen UR (2002) Zonal flow driven by strongly supercritical convection in rotating spherical shells . J Fluid Mech 470(1):115--133. doi:10.1017/S0022112002002008

2002 doi
[76]

Geophys J Int 166:97--114

Christensen UR, Aubert J (2006) Scaling properties of convection-driven dynamos in rotating spherical shells and application to planetary magnetic fields . Geophys J Int 166:97--114. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03009.x

2006 arXiv
[77]

a pyl \"a PJ, K \

Cole E, Brandenburg A, K \"a pyl \"a PJ, K \"a pyl \"a MJ (2016) Robustness of oscillatory ^ 2 dynamos in spherical wedges . 593:A134. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628165. https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.05246 arXiv:1601.05246 [astro-ph.SR]

2016 arXiv
[78]

Astron Nachr 331:667

Courvoisier A, Hughes DW, Proctor MRE (2010) A self-consistent treatment of the electromotive force in magnetohydrodynamics for large diffusivities . Astron Nachr 331:667. doi:10.1002/asna.201011358. https://arxiv.org/abs/1001.4398 arXiv:1001.4398 [astro-ph.SR]

2010 arXiv
[79]

329:350--360

Covas E, Tavakol R, Tworkowski A, Brandenburg A (1998) Axisymmetric mean field dynamos with dynamic and algebraic alpha -quenchings . 329:350--360. doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9709062. https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9709062 arXiv:astro-ph/9709062 [astro-ph]

1998 doi arXiv
[80]

94:39--48

Cowling TG (1933) The magnetic field of sunspots . 94:39--48. doi:10.1093/mnras/94.1.39

1933 doi
[81]

Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics, Cambridge University Press

Davidson PA (2001) An Introduction to Magnetohydrodynamics. Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics, Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511626333

2001 doi
[82]

429:1686--1694

Del Sordo F, Guerrero G, Brandenburg A (2013) Turbulent dynamos with advective magnetic helicity flux . 429:1686--1694. doi:10.1093/mnras/sts398. https://arxiv.org/abs/1205.3502 arXiv:1205.3502 [astro-ph.GA]

2013 arXiv
[83]

518:508--520

Dikpati M, Charbonneau P (1999) A Babcock-Leighton Flux Transport Dynamo with Solar-like Differential Rotation . 518:508--520. doi:10.1086/307269

1999 doi
[84]

638:336--347

Dobler W, Stix M, Brandenburg A (2006) Magnetic Field Generation in Fully Convective Rotating Spheres . 638:336--347. doi:10.1086/498634. https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:astro-ph/0410645 arXiv:astro-ph/0410645

2006 arXiv
[85]

423:1101--1107

Dorch SBF (2004) Magnetic activity in late-type giant stars: Numerical MHD simulations of non-linear dynamo action in Betelgeuse . 423:1101--1107. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20040435. https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0403321 arXiv:astro-ph/0403321 [astro-ph]

2004 arXiv
[86]

365:562--570

Dorch SBF, Nordlund A (2001) On the transport of magnetic fields by solar-like stratified convection . 365:562--570. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20000141

2001 doi
[87]

456:1708--1722

Duarte LDV, Wicht J, Browning MK, Gastine T (2016) Helicity inversion in spherical convection as a means for equatorward dynamo wave propagation . 456:1708--1722. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2726. https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.05813 arXiv:1511.05813 [astro-ph.SR]

2016 arXiv
[88]

Dub \'e C, Charbonneau P (2013) Stellar Dynamos and Cycles from Numerical Simulations of Convection . 775:69. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/775/1/69

2013 doi
[89]

533(1):546--556

Elliott JR, Miesch MS, Toomre J (2000) Turbulent Solar Convection and Its Coupling with Rotation: The Effect of Prandtl Number and Thermal Boundary Conditions on the Resulting Differential Rotation . 533(1):546--556. doi:10.1086/308643

2000 doi
[90]

Fan Y, Fang F (2014) A Simulation of Convective Dynamo in the Solar Convective Envelope: Maintenance of the Solar-like Differential Rotation and Emerging Flux . 789:35. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/789/1/35. https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.3926 arXiv:1405.3926 [astro-ph.SR]

2014 arXiv
[91]

806(1):79

Fang F, Fan Y (2015) -Sunspot Formation in Simulation of Active-region-scale Flux Emergence . 806(1):79. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/79. https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.04393 arXiv:1504.04393 [astro-ph.SR]

2015 arXiv
[92]

J Fluid Mech 690:262--287

Favier B, Bushby PJ (2012) Small-scale dynamo action in rotating compressible convection . J Fluid Mech 690:262--287. doi:10.1017/jfm.2011.429. https://arxiv.org/abs/1110.0374 arXiv:1110.0374 [astro-ph.SR]

2012 arXiv
[93]

203(2):195--210

Forg \'a cs-Dajka E, Petrovay K (2001) Tachocline Confinement by an Oscillatory Magnetic Field . 203(2):195--210. doi:10.1023/A:1013389631585. https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0106133 arXiv:astro-ph/0106133 [astro-ph]

2001 arXiv
[94]

356(6371):691--693

Galloway DJ, Proctor MRE (1992) Numerical calculations of fast dynamos in smooth velocity fields with realistic diffusion . 356(6371):691--693. doi:10.1038/356691a0

1992 doi
[95]

Gastine T, Duarte L, Wicht J (2012) Dipolar versus multipolar dynamos: the influence of the background density stratification . 546:A19. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219799. https://arxiv.org/abs/1208.6093 arXiv:1208.6093 [astro-ph.SR]

2012 arXiv
[96]

438:L76--L80

Gastine T, Yadav RK, Morin J, Reiners A, Wicht J (2014) From solar-like to antisolar differential rotation in cool stars . 438:L76--L80. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slt162. https://arxiv.org/abs/1311.3047 arXiv:1311.3047 [astro-ph.SR]

2014 arXiv
[97]

The mean magnetic field

Gent FA, Shukurov A, Sarson GR, Fletcher A, Mantere MJ (2013) The supernova-regulated ISM - II. The mean magnetic field. 430:L40--L44. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sls042. https://arxiv.org/abs/1206.6784 arXiv:1206.6784 [astro-ph.GA]

2013 arXiv
[98]

715:L133--L137

Ghizaru M, Charbonneau P, Smolarkiewicz PK (2010) Magnetic Cycles in Global Large-eddy Simulations of Solar Convection . 715:L133--L137. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/715/2/L133

2010 doi
[99]

II - Dynamos with cycles and strong feedbacks

Gilman PA (1983) Dynamically consistent nonlinear dynamos driven by convection in a rotating spherical shell. II - Dynamos with cycles and strong feedbacks . 53:243--268. doi:10.1086/190891

1983 doi
[100]

46:211--238

Gilman PA, Miller J (1981) Dynamically consistent nonlinear dynamos driven by convection in a rotating spherical shell . 46:211--238. doi:10.1086/190743

1981 doi
[101]

Science 368(6498):1469--1472

Gizon L, Cameron RH, Pourabdian M, Liang ZC, Fournier D, Birch AC, Hanson CS (2020) Meridional flow in the Sun s convection zone is a single cell in each hemisphere . Science 368(6498):1469--1472. doi:10.1126/science.aaz7119

2020 doi
[102]

Glatzmaier GA (1984) Numerical simulations of stellar convective dynamos. I. The model and method. J Comput Phys 55:461--484. doi:10.1016/0021-9991(84)90033-0

1984 doi
[103]

II - Field propagation in the convection zone

Glatzmaier GA (1985) Numerical simulations of stellar convective dynamos. II - Field propagation in the convection zone . 291:300--307. doi:10.1086/163069

1985 doi
[104]

943(1):66

Gopalakrishnan K, Subramanian K (2023) Magnetic Helicity Fluxes from Triple Correlators . 943(1):66. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aca808. https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.14810 arXiv:2209.14810 [astro-ph.GA]

2023 arXiv
[105]

394(6695):755--757

Gough DO, McIntyre ME (1998) Inevitability of a magnetic field in the Sun's radiative interior . 394(6695):755--757. doi:10.1038/29472

1998 doi
[107]

486(3):L35--L38

Gressel O, Elstner D, Ziegler U, R \"u diger G (2008) Direct simulations of a supernova-driven galactic dynamo . 486(3):L35--L38. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200810195. https://arxiv.org/abs/0805.2616 arXiv:0805.2616 [astro-ph]

2008 arXiv
[108]

72(11):1651--1653

Gruzinov AV, Diamond PH (1994) Self-consistent theory of mean-field electrodynamics . 72(11):1651--1653. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.1651

1994 doi
[109]

Phys Plasmas 2:1941--1946

Gruzinov AV, Diamond PH (1995) Self-consistent mean field electrodynamics of turbulent dynamos . Phys Plasmas 2:1941--1946. doi:10.1063/1.871495

1995 doi
[110]

Guerrero G, K \"a pyl \"a PJ (2011) Dynamo action and magnetic buoyancy in convection simulations with vertical shear . 533:A40. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116749. https://arxiv.org/abs/1102.3598 arXiv:1102.3598 [astro-ph.SR]

2011 arXiv
[111]

Guerrero G, Smolarkiewicz PK, de Gouveia Dal Pino EM, Kosovichev AG, Mansour NN (2016) On the Role of Tachoclines in Solar and Stellar Dynamos . 819:104. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/819/2/104. https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.04434 arXiv:1507.04434 [astro-ph.SR]

2016 arXiv
[112]

doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab224a

Guerrero G, Zaire B, Smolarkiewicz PK, de Gouveia Dal Pino EM, Kosovichev AG, Mansour NN (2019) What Sets the Magnetic Field Strength and Cycle Period in Solar-type Stars? 880(1):6. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab224a. https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.07978 arXiv:1810.07978 [astro-ph.SR]

2019 arXiv
[113]

940(2):151

Guerrero G, Stejko AM, Kosovichev AG, Smolarkiewicz PK, Strugarek A (2022) Implicit Large-eddy Simulations of Global Solar Convection: Effects of Numerical Resolution in Nonrotating and Rotating Cases . 940(2):151. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac9af3. https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.05738...

2022 arXiv
[114]

J Fluid Mech 758:407--435

Guervilly C, Hughes DW, Jones CA (2014) Large-scale vortices in rapidly rotating Rayleigh-B \'e nard convection . J Fluid Mech 758:407--435. doi:10.1017/jfm.2014.542. https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.7442 arXiv:1403.7442 [physics.flu-dyn]

2014 arXiv
[115]

91(4):041001

Guervilly C, Hughes DW, Jones CA (2015) Generation of magnetic fields by large-scale vortices in rotating convection . 91(4):041001. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.91.041001. https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.08599 arXiv:1503.08599 [physics.flu-dyn]

2015 arXiv
[116]

J Fluid Mech 815:333--360

Guervilly C, Hughes DW, Jones CA (2017) Large-scale-vortex dynamos in planar rotating convection . J Fluid Mech 815:333--360. doi:10.1017/jfm.2017.56. https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.00824 arXiv:1607.00824 [physics.flu-dyn]

2017 arXiv
[117]

Hale GE (1908) On the Probable Existence of a Magnetic Field in Sun-Spots . 28:315. doi:10.1086/141602

1908 doi
[118]

Hale GE, Ellerman F, Nicholson SB, Joy AH (1919) The Magnetic Polarity of Sun-Spots . 49:153. doi:10.1086/142452

1919 doi
[119]

Annu Rev Fluid Mech 48:191--217

Hanasoge S, Gizon L, Sreenivasan KR (2016) Seismic Sounding of Convection in the Sun . Annu Rev Fluid Mech 48:191--217. doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-122414-034534. https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.07961 arXiv:1503.07961 [astro-ph.SR]

2016 arXiv
[120]

Living Rev Sol Phys 19(1):3

Hanasoge SM (2022) Surface and interior meridional circulation in the Sun . Living Rev Sol Phys 19(1):3. doi:10.1007/s41116-022-00034-7

2022 doi
[121]

Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:11928--11932

Hanasoge SM, Duvall TL, Sreenivasan KR (2012) Anomalously weak solar convection . Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:11928--11932. doi:10.1073/pnas.1206570109. https://arxiv.org/abs/1206.3173 arXiv:1206.3173 [astro-ph.SR]

2012 arXiv
[122]

Science Advances 6(30):eaba9639

Hanasoge SM, Hotta H, Sreenivasan KR (2020) Turbulence in the Sun is suppressed on large scales and confined to equatorial regions . Science Advances 6(30):eaba9639. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aba9639

2020 doi
[123]

Living Rev Sol Phys 12:4

Hathaway DH (2015) The Solar Cycle . Living Rev Sol Phys 12:4. doi:10.1007/lrsp-2015-4. https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.07020 arXiv:1502.07020 [astro-ph.SR]

2015 arXiv
[124]

70(1):016308

Haugen NEL, Brandenburg A, Dobler W (2004) Simulations of nonhelical hydromagnetic turbulence . 70(1):016308. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.70.016308. https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0307059 astro-ph/0307059

2004 arXiv
[125]

691:A326

Hidalgo JP, K \"a pyl \"a PJ, Schleicher DRG, Ortiz-Rodr \' guez CA, Navarrete FH (2024) Magnetohydrodynamic simulations of A-type stars: Long-term evolution of core dynamo cycles . 691:A326. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449977. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.18066 arXiv:2409.18066 [a...

2024 arXiv
[126]

Hotta H (2017) Solar Overshoot Region and Small-scale Dynamo with Realistic Energy Flux . 843:52. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa784b. https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.06413 arXiv:1706.06413 [astro-ph.SR]

2017 arXiv
[127]

985(2):163

Hotta H (2025) Simultaneous Construction of Fast Equator, Poleward Meridional Flow, and Near-surface Shear Layer in Solar Magnetohydrodynamic Calculation . 985(2):163. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adca3b. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.05680 arXiv:2504.05680 [astro-ph.SR]

2025 arXiv
[128]

Nature Astronomy 5:1100--1102

Hotta H, Kusano K (2021) Solar differential rotation reproduced with high-resolution simulation . Nature Astronomy 5:1100--1102. doi:10.1038/s41550-021-01459-0. https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.06280 arXiv:2109.06280 [astro-ph.SR]

2021 arXiv
[129]

Hotta H, Rempel M, Yokoyama T, Iida Y, Fan Y (2012) Numerical calculation of convection with reduced speed of sound technique . 539:A30. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118268. https://arxiv.org/abs/1201.1061 arXiv:1201.1061 [astro-ph.SR]

2012 arXiv
[130]

Hotta H, Rempel M, Yokoyama T (2015) High-resolution Calculation of the Solar Global Convection with the Reduced Speed of Sound Technique. II. Near Surface Shear Layer with the Rotation . 798:51. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/798/1/51. https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.7093 arXiv:1410.7093 [...

2015 arXiv
[131]

Science 351(6280):1427--1430

Hotta H, Rempel M, Yokoyama T (2016) Large-scale magnetic fields at high reynolds numbers in magnetohydrodynamic simulations. Science 351(6280):1427--1430. doi:10.1126/science.aad1893

2016 doi
[132]

933(2):199

Hotta H, Kusano K, Shimada R (2022) Generation of Solar-like Differential Rotation . 933(2):199. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7395. https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.04183 arXiv:2202.04183 [astro-ph.SR]

2022 arXiv
[133]

219(8):77

Hotta H, Bekki Y, Gizon L, Noraz Q, Rast M (2023) Dynamics of Large-Scale Solar Flows . 219(8):77. doi:10.1007/s11214-023-01021-6. https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.06481 arXiv:2307.06481 [astro-ph.SR]

2023 arXiv
[134]

Living Rev Sol Phys 6(1):1

Howe R (2009) Solar Interior Rotation and its Variation . Living Rev Sol Phys 6(1):1. doi:10.12942/lrsp-2009-1. https://arxiv.org/abs/0902.2406 arXiv:0902.2406 [astro-ph.SR]

2009 arXiv
[135]

706:712--726

Hubbard A, Brandenburg A (2009) Memory Effects in Turbulent Transport . 706:712--726. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/706/1/712. https://arxiv.org/abs/0811.2561 arXiv:0811.2561

2009 arXiv
[136]

748(1):51

Hubbard A, Brandenburg A (2012) Catastrophic Quenching in Dynamos Revisited . 748(1):51. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/748/1/51. https://arxiv.org/abs/1107.0238 arXiv:1107.0238 [astro-ph.SR]

2012 arXiv
[138]

Hubbard A, Rheinhardt M, Brandenburg A (2011) The fratricide of dynamos by their ^ 2 siblings . 535:A48. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116705. https://arxiv.org/abs/1102.2617 arXiv:1102.2617 [astro-ph.SR]

2011 arXiv
[139]

J Fluid Mech 594:445--461

Hughes DW, Cattaneo F (2008) The alpha-effect in rotating convection: size matters . J Fluid Mech 594:445--461. doi:10.1017/S0022112007009214

2008 doi
[140]

Phys Rev Lett 102(4):044501

Hughes DW, Proctor MRE (2009) Large-Scale Dynamo Action Driven by Velocity Shear and Rotating Convection . Phys Rev Lett 102(4):044501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.044501. https://arxiv.org/abs/0810.1586 arXiv:0810.1586

2009 arXiv
[141]

J Fluid Mech 717:395--416

Hughes DW, Proctor MRE (2013) The effect of velocity shear on dynamo action due to rotating convection . J Fluid Mech 717:395--416. doi:10.1017/jfm.2012.584. https://arxiv.org/abs/1211.5339 arXiv:1211.5339 [astro-ph.SR]

2013 arXiv
[142]

Phys Rev Lett 98(20):208501

Iskakov AB, Schekochihin AA, Cowley SC, McWilliams JC, Proctor MRE (2007) Numerical Demonstration of Fluctuation Dynamo at Low Magnetic Prandtl Numbers . Phys Rev Lett 98(20):208501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.208501. https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:astro-ph/0702291 arXiv:astro-ph/0702291

2007 arXiv
[143]

Jabbari S, Brandenburg A, Kleeorin N, Mitra D, Rogachevskii I (2015) Bipolar Magnetic Spots from Dynamos in Stratified Spherical Shell Turbulence . 805:166. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/805/2/166. https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.4912 arXiv:1411.4912 [astro-ph.SR]

2015 arXiv
[144]

262(1):19

Jermyn AS, Anders EH, Lecoanet D, Cantiello M (2022) An Atlas of Convection in Main-sequence Stars . 262(1):19. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac7cee. https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.00011 arXiv:2206.00011 [astro-ph.SR]

2022 arXiv
[145]

186(1-4):491--523

Jiang J, Hathaway DH, Cameron RH, Solanki SK, Gizon L, Upton L (2014) Magnetic Flux Transport at the Solar Surface . 186(1-4):491--523. doi:10.1007/s11214-014-0083-1. https://arxiv.org/abs/1408.3186 arXiv:1408.3186 [astro-ph.SR]

2014 arXiv
[146]

Fluctuating kinetic helicity with zero mean

Jingade N, Singh NK (2021) Mean field dynamo action in shearing flows - II. Fluctuating kinetic helicity with zero mean . 508(4):5163--5175. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2854. https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.12599 arXiv:2103.12599 [physics.flu-dyn]

2021 arXiv
[147]

204(1):227--238

Jones CA, Kuzanyan KM (2009) Compressible convection in the deep atmospheres of giant planets . 204(1):227--238. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2009.05.022

2009 doi
[148]

J Fluid Mech 404(1):311--343

Jones CA, Roberts PH (2000) Convection-driven dynamos in a rotating plane layer . J Fluid Mech 404(1):311--343. doi:10.1017/S0022112099007363

2000 doi
[149]

a pyl \"a MJ, K \

K \"a pyl \"a MJ, K \"a pyl \"a PJ, Olspert N, Brandenburg A, Warnecke J, Karak BB, Pelt J (2016 a ) Multiple dynamo modes as a mechanism for long-term solar activity variations . 589:A56. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527002. https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.05417 arXiv:1507.05417 [astro-ph.SR]

2016 arXiv
[150]

905(2):179

K \"a pyl \"a MJ, Vizoso J \'A , Rheinhardt M, Brandenburg A, Singh NK (2020 a ) On the Existence of Shear-current Effects in Magnetized Burgulence . 905(2):179. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abc1e8. https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.05661 arXiv:2006.05661 [physics.flu-dyn]

2020 arXiv
[151]

932(1):8

K \"a pyl \"a MJ, Rheinhardt M, Brandenburg A (2022) Compressible Test-field Method and Its Application to Shear Dynamos . 932(1):8. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5b78. https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.01107 arXiv:2106.01107 [physics.flu-dyn]

2022 arXiv
[152]

K \"a pyl \"a PJ (2021) Star-in-a-box simulations of fully convective stars . 651:A66. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202040049. https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.01259 arXiv:2012.01259 [astro-ph.SR]

2021 arXiv
[153]

931(2):L17

K \"a pyl \"a PJ (2022) Solar-like dynamos and rotational scaling of cycles from star-in-a-box simulations . 931(2):L17. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6e6b. https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.04329 arXiv:2202.04329 [astro-ph.SR]

2022 arXiv
[154]

K \"a pyl \"a PJ (2023) Transition from anti-solar to solar-like differential rotation: Dependence on Prandtl number . 669:A98. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244395. https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.00302 arXiv:2207.00302 [astro-ph.SR]

2023 arXiv
[155]

683:A221

K \"a pyl \"a PJ (2024) Convective scale and subadiabatic layers in simulations of rotating compressible convection . 683:A221. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348325. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.12855 arXiv:2310.12855 [astro-ph.SR]

2024 arXiv
[156]

K \"a pyl \"a PJ (2025) Simulations of entropy rain-driven convection . 698:L13. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554952. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.00738 arXiv:2504.00738 [astro-ph.SR]

2025 arXiv
[157]

699:1059--1066

K \"a pyl \"a PJ, Brandenburg A (2009) Turbulent Dynamos with Shear and Fractional Helicity . 699:1059--1066. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/699/2/1059. https://arxiv.org/abs/0810.2298 arXiv:0810.2298

2009 arXiv
[158]

K \"a pyl \"a PJ, Korpi MJ, Ossendrijver M, Stix M (2006 a ) Magnetoconvection and dynamo coefficients. III. -effect and magnetic pumping in the rapid rotation regime . 455:401--412. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20064972. https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:astro-ph/0602111 arXiv:astro-ph/0602111

2006 arXiv
[159]

Astron Nachr 327:884

K \"a pyl \"a PJ, Korpi MJ, Tuominen I (2006 b ) Solar dynamo models with -effect and turbulent pumping from local 3D convection calculations . Astron Nachr 327:884. doi:10.1002/asna.200610636. https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:astro-ph/0606089 arXiv:astro-ph/0606089

2006 arXiv
[160]

491:353--362

K \"a pyl \"a PJ, Korpi MJ, Brandenburg A (2008) Large-scale dynamos in turbulent convection with shear . 491:353--362. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200810307. https://arxiv.org/abs/0806.0375 arXiv:0806.0375

2008 arXiv
[161]

500:633--646

K \"a pyl \"a PJ, Korpi MJ, Brandenburg A (2009 a ) Alpha effect and turbulent diffusion from convection . 500:633--646. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200811498. https://arxiv.org/abs/0812.1792 arXiv:0812.1792

2009 arXiv
[162]

697:1153--1163

K \"a pyl \"a PJ, Korpi MJ, Brandenburg A (2009 b ) Large-scale Dynamos in Rigidly Rotating Turbulent Convection . 697:1153--1163. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/1153. https://arxiv.org/abs/0812.3958 arXiv:0812.3958

2009 arXiv
[163]

K \"a pyl \"a PJ, Korpi MJ, Brandenburg A (2010 a ) Open and closed boundaries in large-scale convective dynamos . 518:A22. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913722. https://arxiv.org/abs/0911.4120 arXiv:0911.4120 [astro-ph.SR]

2010 arXiv
[164]

402:1458--1466

K \"a pyl \"a PJ, Korpi MJ, Brandenburg A (2010 b ) The effect in rotating convection with sinusoidal shear . 402:1458--1466. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16004.x. https://arxiv.org/abs/0908.2423 arXiv:0908.2423 [astro-ph.SR]

2010
[165]

Astron Nachr 331:73

K \"a pyl \"a PJ, Korpi MJ, Brandenburg A, Mitra D, Tavakol R (2010 c ) Convective dynamos in spherical wedge geometry . Astron Nachr 331:73. doi:10.1002/asna.200911252. https://arxiv.org/abs/0909.1330 arXiv:0909.1330 [astro-ph.SR]

2010 arXiv
[166]

K \"a pyl \"a PJ, Mantere MJ, Hackman T (2011) Starspots due to Large-scale Vortices in Rotating Turbulent Convection . 742:34. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/742/1/34. https://arxiv.org/abs/1106.6029 arXiv:1106.6029 [astro-ph.SR]

2011 arXiv
[167]

422:2465--2473

K \"a pyl \"a PJ, Brandenburg A, Kleeorin N, Mantere MJ, Rogachevskii I (2012 a ) Negative effective magnetic pressure in turbulent convection . 422:2465--2473. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20801.x. https://arxiv.org/abs/1104.4541 arXiv:1104.4541 [astro-ph.SR]

2012
[168]

K \"a pyl \"a PJ, Mantere MJ, Brandenburg A (2012 b ) Cyclic Magnetic Activity due to Turbulent Convection in Spherical Wedge Geometry . 755:L22. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/755/1/L22. https://arxiv.org/abs/1205.4719 arXiv:1205.4719 [astro-ph.SR]

2012 arXiv
[169]

Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dynam 107:244--257

K \"a pyl \"a PJ, Mantere MJ, Brandenburg A (2013 a ) Oscillatory large-scale dynamos from Cartesian convection simulations . Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dynam 107:244--257. doi:10.1080/03091929.2012.715158

2013
[170]

K \"a pyl \"a PJ, Mantere MJ, Cole E, Warnecke J, Brandenburg A (2013 b ) Effects of Enhanced Stratification on Equatorward Dynamo Wave Propagation . 778:41. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/778/1/41. https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.2595 arXiv:1301.2595 [astro-ph.SR]

2013 arXiv
[171]

a pyl \"a PJ, K \

K \"a pyl \"a PJ, K \"a pyl \"a MJ, Brandenburg A (2014) Confirmation of bistable stellar differential rotation profiles . 570:A43. https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.2981 arXiv:1401.2981 [astro-ph.SR]

2014 arXiv
[172]

a pyl \"a PJ, Brandenburg A, Kleeorin N, K \

K \"a pyl \"a PJ, Brandenburg A, Kleeorin N, K \"a pyl \"a MJ, Rogachevskii I (2016 b ) Magnetic flux concentrations from turbulent stratified convection . 588:A150. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527731. https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.03718 arXiv:1511.03718 [astro-ph.SR]

2016 arXiv
[173]

a pyl \"a PJ, K \

K \"a pyl \"a PJ, K \"a pyl \"a MJ, Olspert N, Warnecke J, Brandenburg A (2017 a ) Convection-driven spherical shell dynamos at varying Prandtl numbers . 599:A4. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628973. https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.05885 arXiv:1605.05885 [astro-ph.SR]

2017 arXiv
[174]

a pyl \"a PJ, Rheinhardt M, Brandenburg A, Arlt R, K \

K \"a pyl \"a PJ, Rheinhardt M, Brandenburg A, Arlt R, K \"a pyl \"a MJ, Lagg A, Olspert N, Warnecke J (2017 b ) Extended Subadiabatic Layer in Simulations of Overshooting Convection . 845:L23. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa83ab. https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.06845 arXiv:1703.06845 [as...

2017 arXiv
[176]

a pyl \"a PJ, Gent FA, Olspert N, K \

K \"a pyl \"a PJ, Gent FA, Olspert N, K \"a pyl \"a MJ, Brandenburg A (2020 b ) Sensitivity to luminosity, centrifugal force, and boundary conditions in spherical shell convection . Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn 114(1-2):8--34. doi:10.1080/03091929.2019.1571586

2020
[177]

a pyl \"a PJ, Rheinhardt M, Brandenburg A, K \

K \"a pyl \"a PJ, Rheinhardt M, Brandenburg A, K \"a pyl \"a MJ (2020 c ) Turbulent viscosity and magnetic Prandtl number from simulations of isotropically forced turbulence . 636:A93. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935012. https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.00787 arXiv:1901.00787 [astro-ph.SR]

2020 arXiv
[178]

219(7):58

K \"a pyl \"a PJ, Browning MK, Brun AS, Guerrero G, Warnecke J (2023) Simulations of Solar and Stellar Dynamos and Their Theoretical Interpretation . 219(7):58. doi:10.1007/s11214-023-01005-6. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.16790 arXiv:2305.16790 [astro-ph.SR]

2023 arXiv
[179]

Living Reviews in Solar Physics 20(1):3

Karak BB (2023) Models for the long-term variations of solar activity . Living Reviews in Solar Physics 20(1):3. doi:10.1007/s41116-023-00037-y. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.17188 arXiv:2305.17188 [astro-ph.SR]

2023 arXiv
[180]

doi:10.3847/0004-637X/816/1/28

Karak BB, Brandenburg A (2016) Is the Small-scale Magnetic Field Correlated with the Dynamo Cycle? 816:28. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/816/1/28. https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.06632 arXiv:1505.06632 [astro-ph.SR]

2016 arXiv
[181]

410(3):1503--1512

Karak BB, Choudhuri AR (2011) The Waldmeier effect and the flux transport solar dynamo . 410(3):1503--1512. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17531.x. https://arxiv.org/abs/1008.0824 arXiv:1008.0824 [astro-ph.SR]

2011
[182]

a pyl \"a PJ, K \

Karak BB, Rheinhardt M, Brandenburg A, K \"a pyl \"a PJ, K \"a pyl \"a MJ (2014) Quenching and Anisotropy of Hydromagnetic Turbulent Transport . 795:16. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/795/1/16. https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.4521 arXiv:1406.4521 [astro-ph.SR]

2014 arXiv
[183]

280:321--333

Kemel K, Brandenburg A, Kleeorin N, Mitra D, Rogachevskii I (2012) Spontaneous Formation of Magnetic Flux Concentrations in Stratified Turbulence . 280:321--333. doi:10.1007/s11207-012-9949-0. https://arxiv.org/abs/1112.0279 arXiv:1112.0279 [astro-ph.SR]

2012 arXiv
[184]

287:293--313

Kemel K, Brandenburg A, Kleeorin N, Mitra D, Rogachevskii I (2013) Active Region Formation through the Negative Effective Magnetic Pressure Instability . 287:293--313. doi:10.1007/s11207-012-0031-8. https://arxiv.org/abs/1203.1232 arXiv:1203.1232 [astro-ph.SR]

2013 arXiv
[185]

243(2):483--491

Kichatinov LL (1991) Turbulent transport of magnetic fields in a highly conducting rotating fluid and the solar cycle. 243(2):483--491

1991
[186]

Kitchatinov LL, R\"udiger G (1995) Differential rotation in solar-type stars: revisiting the Taylor-number puzzle. 299:446

1995
[187]

Astron Nachr 315:157--170

Kitchatinov LL, Pipin VV, R\"udiger G (1994) Turbulent viscosity, magnetic diffusivity, and heat conductivity under the influence of rotation and magnetic field . Astron Nachr 315:157--170

1994
[188]

67(2):026321

Kleeorin N, Rogachevskii I (2003) Effect of rotation on a developed turbulent stratified convection: The hydrodynamic helicity, the effect, and the effective drift velocity . 67(2):026321. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.67.026321. https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0209530 arXiv:astro-ph/02...

2003 arXiv
[189]

77(3):036307

Kleeorin N, Rogachevskii I (2008) Mean-field dynamo in a turbulence with shear and kinetic helicity fluctuations . 77(3):036307. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.77.036307. https://arxiv.org/abs/0711.4726 arXiv:0711.4726 [astro-ph]

2008 arXiv
[190]

86(1):018404

Kleeorin N, Rogachevskii I (2012) Growth rate of small-scale dynamo at low magnetic Prandtl numbers . 86(1):018404. doi:10.1088/0031-8949/86/01/018404. https://arxiv.org/abs/1112.3926 arXiv:1112.3926 [astro-ph.SR]

2012 arXiv
[191]

515(4):5437--5448

Kleeorin N, Rogachevskii I (2022) Turbulent magnetic helicity fluxes in solar convective zone . 515(4):5437--5448. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2141. https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.14152 arXiv:2206.14152 [astro-ph.SR]

2022 arXiv
[192]

361:L5--L8

Kleeorin N, Moss D, Rogachevskii I, Sokoloff D (2000) Helicity balance and steady-state strength of the dynamo generated galactic magnetic field . 361:L5--L8. doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0205266. https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0205266 arXiv:astro-ph/0205266 [astro-ph]

2000 doi arXiv
[193]

Sov Astron Lett 15:274

Kleeorin NI, Rogachevskii IV, Ruzmaikin AA (1989) Negative Magnetic Pressure as a Trigger of Largescale Magnetic Instability in the Solar Convective Zone . Sov Astron Lett 15:274

1989
[194]

Sov\ Phys\ JETP 70:878--883

Kleeorin NI, Rogachevskii IV, Ruzmaikin AA (1990) Magnetic force reversal and instability in a plasma with advanced magnetohydrodynamic turbulence . Sov\ Phys\ JETP 70:878--883

1990
[195]

J Fluid Mech 77:753--768

Kraichnan RH (1976) Diffusion of passive-scalar and magnetic fields by helical turbulence . J Fluid Mech 77:753--768. doi:10.1017/S0022112076002875

1976 doi
[196]

Pergamon Press, Oxford

Krause F, R \"a dler KH (1980) Mean-field Magnetohydrodynamics and Dynamo Theory . Pergamon Press, Oxford

1980
[197]

Z Naturforsch A 22:671

Krause F, Steenbeck M (1967) Untersuchung der Dynamowirkung enier nichtspiegelsymmetrischen Turbulenz an einfachen Modellen . Z Naturforsch A 22:671. doi:10.1515/zna-1967-0512

1967 doi
[198]

Liv Rev Comp Astrophys 3:1

Kupka F, Muthsam HJ (2017) Modelling of stellar convection . Liv Rev Comp Astrophys 3:1. doi:10.1007/s41115-017-0001-9

2017 doi
[199]

Rep Brit Adv Sci pp 159--160

Larmor J (1919) How could a rotating body such as the sun become a magnet. Rep Brit Adv Sci pp 159--160. ://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10029017512/en/

1919
[200]

293(2):29

Larson TP, Schou J (2018) Global-Mode Analysis of Full-Disk Data from the Michelson Doppler Imager and the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager . 293(2):29. doi:10.1007/s11207-017-1201-5

2018 doi
[201]

Losada IR, Brandenburg A, Kleeorin N, Mitra D, Rogachevskii I (2012) Rotational effects on the negative magnetic pressure instability . 548:A49. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220078. https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.5392 arXiv:1207.5392 [astro-ph.SR]

2012 arXiv
[202]

Losada IR, Brandenburg A, Kleeorin N, Rogachevskii I (2013) Competition of rotation and stratification in flux concentrations . 556:A83. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220939. https://arxiv.org/abs/1212.4077 arXiv:1212.4077 [astro-ph.SR]

2013 arXiv
[203]

Losada IR, Warnecke J, Brandenburg A, Kleeorin N, Rogachevskii I (2019) Magnetic bipoles in rotating turbulence with coronal envelope . 621:A61. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833018. https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.04446 arXiv:1803.04446 [astro-ph.SR]

2019 arXiv
[204]

Mabuchi J, Masada Y, Kageyama A (2015) Differential Rotation in Magnetized and Non-magnetized Stars . 806:10. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/10. https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.01129 arXiv:1504.01129 [astro-ph.SR]

2015 arXiv
[205]

J Fluid Mech 67:417--443

Malkus WVR, Proctor MRE (1975) The macrodynamics of alpha-effect dynamos in rotating fluids . J Fluid Mech 67:417--443. doi:10.1017/S0022112075000390

1975 doi
[206]

794(1):L6

Masada Y, Sano T (2014) Mean-Field Modeling of an ^ 2 Dynamo Coupled with Direct Numerical Simulations of Rigidly Rotating Convection . 794(1):L6. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/794/1/L6. https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.3256 arXiv:1409.3256 [astro-ph.SR]

2014 arXiv
[207]

Masada Y, Sano T (2016) Spontaneous Formation of Surface Magnetic Structure from Large-scale Dynamo in Strongly Stratified Convection . 822:L22. doi:10.3847/2041-8205/822/2/L22. https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.05374 arXiv:1604.05374 [astro-ph.SR]

2016 arXiv
[208]

https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.06566 arXiv:2206.06566 [astro-ph.SR]

Masada Y, Sano T (2022) Rotational Dependence of Large-scale Dynamo in Strongly-stratified Convection: What Causes It? arXiv e-prints arXiv:2206.06566. https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.06566 arXiv:2206.06566 [astro-ph.SR]

2022 arXiv
[209]

924(2):75

Masada Y, Takiwaki T, Kotake K (2022) Convection and Dynamo in Newly Born Neutron Stars . 924(2):75. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac34f6. https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.08452 arXiv:2001.08452 [astro-ph.HE]

2022 arXiv
[210]

892(2):106

Matilsky LI, Toomre J (2020) Exploring Bistability in the Cycles of the Solar Dynamo through Global Simulations . 892(2):106. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab791c. https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.08158 arXiv:1912.08158 [astro-ph.SR]

2020 arXiv
[211]

Matilsky LI, Hindman BW, Toomre J (2019) The Role of Downflows in Establishing Solar Near-surface Shear . 871:217. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf647. https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.00115 arXiv:1810.00115 [astro-ph.SR]

2019 arXiv
[212]

940(2):L50

Matilsky LI, Hindman BW, Featherstone NA, Blume CC, Toomre J (2022) Confinement of the Solar Tachocline by Dynamo Action in the Radiative Interior . 940(2):L50. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac93ef. https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.12920 arXiv:2206.12920 [astro-ph.SR]

2022 arXiv
[213]

J Fluid Mech 205:297--318

Meneguzzi M, Pouquet A (1989) Turbulent dynamos driven by convection . J Fluid Mech 205:297--318. doi:10.1017/S0022112089002041

1989 doi
[214]

47(15):1060--1064

Meneguzzi M, Frisch U, Pouquet A (1981) Helical and nonhelical turbulent dynamos . 47(15):1060--1064. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.1060

1981 doi
[215]

194:97--137

Miesch M, Matthaeus W, Brandenburg A, Petrosyan A, Pouquet A, Cambon C, Jenko F, Uzdensky D, Stone J, Tobias S, Toomre J, Velli M (2015) Large-Eddy Simulations of Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence in Heliophysics and Astrophysics . 194:97--137. doi:10.1007/s11214-015-0190-7. http...

2015 arXiv
[216]

Ann Rev Fluid Mech 41:317--345

Miesch MS, Toomre J (2009) Turbulence, Magnetism, and Shear in Stellar Interiors . Ann Rev Fluid Mech 41:317--345. doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.010908.165215

2009
[217]

Miesch MS, Elliott JR, Toomre J, Clune TL, Glatzmaier GA, Gilman PA (2000) Three-dimensional Spherical Simulations of Solar Convection. I. Differential Rotation and Pattern Evolution Achieved with Laminar and Turbulent States . 532:593--615. doi:10.1086/308555

2000 doi
[218]

495:1--8

Mitra D, K \"a pyl \"a PJ, Tavakol R, Brandenburg A (2009 a ) Alpha effect and diffusivity in helical turbulence with shear . 495:1--8. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200810359. https://arxiv.org/abs/0806.1608 arXiv:0806.1608

2009 arXiv
[219]

697:923--933

Mitra D, Tavakol R, Brandenburg A, Moss D (2009 b ) Turbulent Dynamos in Spherical Shell Segments of Varying Geometrical Extent . 697:923--933. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/697/1/923. https://arxiv.org/abs/0812.3106 arXiv:0812.3106

2009 arXiv
[220]

Astron Nachr 331:130

Mitra D, Candelaresi S, Chatterjee P, Tavakol R, Brandenburg A (2010 a ) Equatorial magnetic helicity flux in simulations with different gauges . Astron Nachr 331:130. doi:10.1002/asna.200911308. https://arxiv.org/abs/0911.0969 arXiv:0911.0969 [astro-ph.SR]

2010 arXiv
[221]

719:L1--L4

Mitra D, Tavakol R, K \"a pyl \"a PJ, Brandenburg A (2010 b ) Oscillatory Migrating Magnetic Fields in Helical Turbulence in Spherical Domains . 719:L1--L4. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/719/1/L1. https://arxiv.org/abs/0901.2364 arXiv:0901.2364 [astro-ph.SR]

2010 arXiv
[222]

107(5):055205

Mizerski KA (2023) Helical correction to turbulent magnetic diffusivity . 107(5):055205. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.107.055205

2023 doi
[223]

J Fluid Mech 65:1--10

Moffatt HK (1974) The mean electromotive force generated by turbulence in the limit of perfect conductivity . J Fluid Mech 65:1--10. doi:10.1017/S0022112074001200

1974 doi
[224]

Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Moffatt HK (1978) Magnetic Field Generation in Electrically Conducting Fluids . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

1978
[225]

Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics, Cambridge University Press

Moffatt K, Dormy E (2019) Self-Exciting Fluid Dynamos. Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics, Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781107588691

2019 doi
[226]

Geophys\ Astrophys\ Fluid Dyn 80:229--240

Moss D, Brandenburg A (1995) The generation of nonaxisymmetric magnetic fields in the giant planets . Geophys\ Astrophys\ Fluid Dyn 80:229--240. doi:10.1080/03091929508228956

1995 doi
[227]

Nelson NJ, Brown BP, Brun AS, Miesch MS, Toomre J (2013) Magnetic Wreaths and Cycles in Convective Dynamos . 762:73. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/762/2/73. https://arxiv.org/abs/1211.3129 arXiv:1211.3129 [astro-ph.SR]

2013 arXiv
[228]

289:441--458

Nelson NJ, Brown BP, Sacha Brun A, Miesch MS, Toomre J (2014) Buoyant Magnetic Loops Generated by Global Convective Dynamo Action . 289:441--458. doi:10.1007/s11207-012-0221-4. https://arxiv.org/abs/1212.5612 arXiv:1212.5612 [astro-ph.SR]

2014 arXiv
[229]

Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn 43(2):149--166

Nicklaus B, Stix M (1988) Corrections to first order smoothing in mean-field electrodynamics . Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn 43(2):149--166. doi:10.1080/03091928808213623

1988 doi
[230]

392:647--652

Nordlund A, Brandenburg A, Jennings RL, Rieutord M, Ruokolainen J, Stein RF, Tuominen I (1992) Dynamo action in stratified convection with overshoot . 392:647--652. doi:10.1086/171465

1992 doi
[231]

58:1475--1489

O'Mara B, Miesch MS, Featherstone NA, Augustson KC (2016) Velocity amplitudes in global convection simulations: The role of the Prandtl number and near-surface driving . 58:1475--1489. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2016.03.038. https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.06107 arXiv:1603.06107 [astro-ph.SR]

2016 arXiv
[232]

Ortiz-Rodr \' guez CA, K \"a pyl \"a PJ, Navarrete FH, Schleicher DRG, Mennickent RE, Hidalgo JP, Toro-Vel \'a squez B (2023) Simulations of dynamo action in slowly rotating M dwarfs: Dependence on dimensionless parameters . 678:A82. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244666. https://ar...

2023 arXiv
[233]

856(1):13

Orvedahl RJ, Calkins MA, Featherstone NA, Hindman BW (2018) Prandtl-number Effects in High-Rayleigh-number Spherical Convection . 856(1):13. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaaeb5. https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.07035 arXiv:1803.07035 [astro-ph.SR]

2018 arXiv
[234]

11:287--367

Ossendrijver M (2003) The solar dynamo . 11:287--367. doi:10.1007/s00159-003-0019-3

2003 doi
[235]

Dependence of the alpha effect on rotation and magnetic field

Ossendrijver M, Stix M, Brandenburg A (2001) Magnetoconvection and dynamo coefficients:. Dependence of the alpha effect on rotation and magnetic field . 376:713--726. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011041. https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0108274 astro-ph/0108274

2001 arXiv
[236]

Ossendrijver M, Stix M, Brandenburg A, R \"u diger G (2002) Magnetoconvection and dynamo coefficients. II. Field-direction dependent pumping of magnetic field . 394:735--745. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021224. https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0202299 astro-ph/0202299

2002 arXiv
[237]

Parker EN (1955 a ) Hydromagnetic Dynamo Models. 122:293. doi:10.1086/146087

1955 doi
[238]

Parker EN (1955 b ) The Formation of Sunspots from the Solar Toroidal Field. 121:491. doi:10.1086/146010

1955 doi
[239]

Parker EN (1971) The Generation of Magnetic Fields in Astrophysical Bodies. III. Turbulent Diffusion of Fields and Efficient Dynamos . 163:279. doi:10.1086/150766

1971 doi
[240]

Parker EN (1975) The generation of magnetic fields in astrophysical bodies. X. Magnetic buoyancy and the solar dynamo. 198:205--209. doi:10.1086/153593

1975 doi
[241]

Oxford, Clarendon Press; New York, Oxford University Press

Parker EN (1979) Cosmical magnetic fields: Their origin and their activity . Oxford, Clarendon Press; New York, Oxford University Press

1979
[242]

568:A113

Passos D, Charbonneau P (2014) Characteristics of magnetic solar-like cycles in a 3D MHD simulation of solar convection . 568:A113. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423700

2014 doi
[243]

Passos D, Charbonneau P, Miesch M (2015) Meridional Circulation Dynamics from 3D Magnetohydrodynamic Global Simulations of Solar Convection . 800:L18. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/800/1/L18. https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.01154 arXiv:1502.01154 [astro-ph.SR]

2015 arXiv
[244]

Science 379(6629):300--303

Petitdemange L, Marcotte F, Gissinger C (2023) Spin-down by dynamo action in simulated radiative stellar layers . Science 379(6629):300--303. doi:10.1126/science.abk2169. https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.13819 arXiv:2206.13819 [astro-ph.SR]

2023 arXiv
[245]

Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn 102(1):21--49

Pipin VV (2008) The mean electro-motive force and current helicity under the influence of rotation, magnetic field and shear . Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn 102(1):21--49. doi:10.1080/03091920701374772. https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0606265 arXiv:astro-ph/0606265 [astro-ph]

2008 arXiv
[246]

466:3007--3020

Pipin VV (2017) Non-linear regimes in mean-field full-sphere dynamo . 466:3007--3020. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3182. https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.00906 arXiv:1609.00906 [astro-ph.SR]

2017 arXiv
[247]

522(2):2919--2927

Pipin VV (2023) Spatio-temporal non-localities in a solar-like mean-field dynamo . 522(2):2919--2927. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1150. https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.11176 arXiv:2302.11176 [astro-ph.SR]

2023 arXiv
[248]

Pipin VV, Kosovichev AG (2018) On the Origin of the Double-cell Meridional Circulation in the Solar Convection Zone . 854:67. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa759. https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.03073 arXiv:1708.03073 [astro-ph.SR]

2018 arXiv
[249]

Physical Review Research 2(1):013321

Plunian F, Alboussi \`e re T (2020) Axisymmetric dynamo action is possible with anisotropic conductivity . Physical Review Research 2(1):013321. doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013321. https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.08157 arXiv:2004.08157 [physics.flu-dyn]

2020 arXiv
[250]

825(1):23

Pongkitiwanichakul P, Nigro G, Cattaneo F, Tobias SM (2016) Shear-driven Dynamo Waves in the Fully Nonlinear Regime . 825(1):23. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/825/1/23

2016 doi
[251]

J Fluid Mech 77:321--354

Pouquet A, Frisch U, L\'eorat J (1976) Strong MHD helical turbulence and the nonlinear dynamo effect . J Fluid Mech 77:321--354. doi:10.1017/S0022112076002140

1976 doi
[252]

382(1):L39--L42

Proctor MRE (2007) Effects of fluctuation on dynamo models . 382(1):L39--L42. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2007.00385.x. https://arxiv.org/abs/0708.3210 arXiv:0708.3210 [astro-ph]

2007
[253]

PhD thesis, Georg August University of G \"o ttingen, Germany

Proxauf B (2021) Observations of large-scale solar flows . PhD thesis, Georg August University of G \"o ttingen, Germany

2021
[254]

Pulkkinen P, Tuominen I (1998) Velocity structures from sunspot statistics in cycles 10 to 22. I. Rotational velocity . 332:748--754

1998
[255]

Racine \'E , Charbonneau P, Ghizaru M, Bouchat A, Smolarkiewicz PK (2011) On the Mode of Dynamo Action in a Global Large-eddy Simulation of Solar Convection . 735:46. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/735/1/46

2011 doi
[256]

Veroeffentlichungen der Geod Geophys 13:131--135

R\"adler KH (1969) On some electromagnetic phenomena in electrically conducting turbulently moving matter, especially in the presence of Coriolis forces. Veroeffentlichungen der Geod Geophys 13:131--135

1969
[257]

In: Bumba V, Kleczek J (eds) Basic Mechanisms of Solar Activity

R \"a dler KH (1976) Mean-Field Magnetohydrodynamics as a Basis of Solar Dynamo Theory . In: Bumba V, Kleczek J (eds) Basic Mechanisms of Solar Activity. vol 71. p 323

1976
[258]

Astron Nachr 301(3):101--129

R\"adler KH (1980) Mean-field approach to spherical dynamo models . Astron Nachr 301(3):101--129. doi:10.1002/asna.2103010302

1980 doi
[259]

Karl Schwarzschild Award Lecture 2013

R \"a dler KH (2014) Mean-field dynamos: The old concept and some recent developments. Karl Schwarzschild Award Lecture 2013 . Astron Nachr 335(5):459. doi:10.1002/asna.201412055

2014 doi
[260]

393(1):113--125

R \"a dler KH, Brandenburg A (2009) Mean-field effects in the Galloway-Proctor flow . 393(1):113--125. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14173.x. https://arxiv.org/abs/0809.0851 arXiv:0809.0851 [astro-ph]

2009
[261]

adler KH, Br\

R\"adler KH, Br\"auer HJ (1987) On the oscillatory behaviour of kinematic mean-field dynamos . Astron Nachr 308:101--109

1987
[262]

Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn 101(2):117--154

R \"a dler KH, Rheinhardt M (2007) Mean-field electrodynamics: critical analysis of various analytical approaches to the mean electromotive force . Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn 101(2):117--154. doi:10.1080/03091920601111068. https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0606267 arXiv:astro-ph...

2007 arXiv
[263]

73(5):056311

R \"a dler KH, Stepanov R (2006) Mean electromotive force due to turbulence of a conducting fluid in the presence of mean flow . 73(5):056311. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.73.056311. https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0512120 arXiv:physics/0512120 [physics.flu-dyn]

2006 arXiv
[264]

622:1320--1332

Rempel M (2005) Solar Differential Rotation and Meridional Flow: The Role of a Subadiabatic Tachocline for the Taylor-Proudman Balance . 622:1320--1332. doi:10.1086/428282. https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:astro-ph/0604451 arXiv:astro-ph/0604451

2005 arXiv
[265]

647:662--675

Rempel M (2006) Flux-Transport Dynamos with Lorentz Force Feedback on Differential Rotation and Meridional Flow: Saturation Mechanism and Torsional Oscillations . 647:662--675. doi:10.1086/505170. https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:astro-ph/0604446 arXiv:astro-ph/0604446

2006 arXiv
[266]

Rempel M, Cheung MCM (2014) Numerical Simulations of Active Region Scale Flux Emergence: From Spot Formation to Decay . 785:90. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/785/2/90. https://arxiv.org/abs/1402.4703 arXiv:1402.4703 [astro-ph.SR]

2014 arXiv
[267]

u ssler M, Cameron RH, Kn \

Rempel M, Sch \"u ssler M, Cameron RH, Kn \"o lker M (2009 a ) Penumbral Structure and Outflows in Simulated Sunspots . Science 325:171--. doi:10.1126/science.1173798. https://arxiv.org/abs/0907.2259 arXiv:0907.2259 [astro-ph.SR]

2009 arXiv
[268]

u ssler M, Kn \

Rempel M, Sch \"u ssler M, Kn \"o lker M (2009 b ) Radiative Magnetohydrodynamic Simulation of Sunspot Structure . 691:640--649. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/691/1/640. https://arxiv.org/abs/0808.3294 arXiv:0808.3294

2009 arXiv
[269]

219(5):36

Rempel M, Bhatia T, Bellot Rubio L, Korpi-Lagg MJ (2023) Small-Scale Dynamos: From Idealized Models to Solar and Stellar Applications . 219(5):36. doi:10.1007/s11214-023-00981-z. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02787 arXiv:2305.02787 [astro-ph.SR]

2023 arXiv
[270]

Rheinhardt M, Brandenburg A (2010) Test-field method for mean-field coefficients with MHD background . 520:A28. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014700. https://arxiv.org/abs/1004.0689 arXiv:1004.0689 [astro-ph.SR]

2010 arXiv
[271]

Astron Nachr 333:71--77

Rheinhardt M, Brandenburg A (2012) Modeling spatio-temporal nonlocality in mean-field dynamos . Astron Nachr 333:71--77. doi:10.1002/asna.201111625. https://arxiv.org/abs/1110.2891 arXiv:1110.2891 [astro-ph.SR]

2012 arXiv
[272]

441(1):116--126

Rheinhardt M, Devlen E, R \"a dler KH, Brandenburg A (2014) Mean-field dynamo action from delayed transport . 441(1):116--126. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu438. https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5026 arXiv:1401.5026 [astro-ph.SR]

2014 arXiv
[273]

286:471--480

Rieutord M, Brandenburg A, Mangeney A, Drossart P (1994) Reynolds stresses and differential rotation in Boussinesq convection in a rotating spherical shell . 286:471--480

1994
[274]

Journal of Plasma Physics 85(4):205850401

Rincon F (2019) Dynamo theories . Journal of Plasma Physics 85(4):205850401. doi:10.1017/S0022377819000539. https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.07829 arXiv:1903.07829 [physics.plasm-ph]

2019 arXiv
[275]

Physical Review Fluids 6(12):L121701

Rincon F (2021) Helical turbulent nonlinear dynamo at large magnetic Reynolds numbers . Physical Review Fluids 6(12):L121701. doi:10.1103/PhysRevFluids.6.L121701. https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.12037 arXiv:2108.12037 [physics.flu-dyn]

2021 arXiv
[276]

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A 271(1216):411--454

Roberts GO (1972) Dynamo Action of Fluid Motions with Two-Dimensional Periodicity . Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A 271(1216):411--454. doi:10.1098/rsta.1972.0015

1972
[277]

Roberts PH, Stix M (1972) Ac-Effect Dynamos, by the Buliard-Geflman Formalism . 18:453

1972
[278]

Cambridge University Press

Rogachevskii I (2021) Introduction to Turbulent Transport of Particles, Temperature and Magnetic Fields: Analytical Methods for Physicists and Engineers. Cambridge University Press

2021
[279]

68(3):036301

Rogachevskii I, Kleeorin N (2003) Electromotive force and large-scale magnetic dynamo in a turbulent flow with a mean shear . 68(3):036301. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.68.036301. https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0209309 astro-ph/0209309

2003 arXiv
[280]

70(4):046310

Rogachevskii I, Kleeorin N (2004) Nonlinear theory of a ``shear-current'' effect and mean-field magnetic dynamos . 70(4):046310. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.70.046310. https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0406328 astro-ph/0406328

2004 arXiv
[281]

76(5):056307

Rogachevskii I, Kleeorin N (2007) Magnetic fluctuations and formation of large-scale inhomogeneous magnetic structures in a turbulent convection . 76(5):056307. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.76.056307. https://arxiv.org/abs/0710.5052 arXiv:0710.5052

2007 arXiv
[282]

Journal of Plasma Physics 81(5):395810504

Rogachevskii I, Kleeorin N (2015) Turbulent fluxes of entropy and internal energy in temperature stratified flows . Journal of Plasma Physics 81(5):395810504. doi:10.1017/S0022377815000963. https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.04109 arXiv:1508.04109 [physics.flu-dyn]

2015 arXiv
[283]

530(1):382--392

Rogachevskii I, Kleeorin N (2024) Budget equations and astrophysical non-linear mean-field dynamos . 530(1):382--392. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae660. https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.05590 arXiv:2308.05590 [astro-ph.SR]

2024 arXiv
[284]

985(1):18

Rogachevskii I, Kleeorin N, Brandenburg A (2025) Theory of the Kinetic Helicity Effect on Turbulent Diffusion of Magnetic and Scalar Fields . 985(1):18. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adcec0. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.13807 arXiv:2501.13807 [physics.flu-dyn]

2025 arXiv
[285]

Roxburgh LW, Simmons J (1993) Numerical studies of convective penetration in plane parallel layers and the integral constraint . 277:93

1993
[286]

Sun and Solar-type Stars

R\"udiger G (1989) Differential Rotation and Stellar Convection. Sun and Solar-type Stars . Akademie Verlag, Berlin

1989
[287]

Wiley-VCH, Weinheim

R \"u diger G, Hollerbach R (2004) The Magnetic Universe: Geophysical and Astrophysical Dynamo Theory . Wiley-VCH, Weinheim

2004
[288]

269(1-2):581--588

R \"u diger G, Kichatinov LL (1993) Alpha-effect and alpha-quenching . 269(1-2):581--588

1993
[289]

Astron Nachr 318(5):273

Rudiger G, Kitchatinov LL (1997) The slender solar tachocline: a magnetic model . Astron Nachr 318(5):273. doi:10.1002/asna.2113180504

1997 doi
[290]

Wiley-VCH

R \"u diger G, Kitchatinov LL, Hollerbach R (2013) Magnetic Processes in Astrophysics: theory,simulations, experiments . Wiley-VCH

2013
[291]

Schad A, Timmer J, Roth M (2013) Global Helioseismic Evidence for a Deeply Penetrating Solar Meridional Flow Consisting of Multiple Flow Cells . 778:L38. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/778/2/L38. https://arxiv.org/abs/1311.7623 arXiv:1311.7623 [astro-ph.SR]

2013 arXiv
[292]

505:390--417

Schou J, Antia HM, Basu S, Bogart RS, Bush RI, Chitre SM, Christensen-Dalsgaard J, di Mauro MP, Dziembowski WA, Eff-Darwich A, Gough DO, Haber DA, Hoeksema JT, Howe R, Korzennik SG, Kosovichev AG, Larsen RM, Pijpers FP, Scherrer PH, Sekii T, Tarbell TD, Title AM, Thompson MJ, ...

1998 doi
[293]

533:A108

Schrinner M (2011) Global dynamo models from direct numerical simulations and their mean-field counterparts . 533:A108. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116642. https://arxiv.org/abs/1105.2912 arXiv:1105.2912 [astro-ph.SR]

2011 arXiv
[294]

431:L78--L82

Schrinner M (2013) Rotational threshold in global numerical dynamo simulations. 431:L78--L82. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slt012. https://arxiv.org/abs/1212.6910 arXiv:1212.6910 [astro-ph.SR]

2013 arXiv
[295]

Astron Nachr 326:245--249

Schrinner M, R \"a dler KH, Schmitt D, Rheinhardt M, Christensen U (2005) Mean-field view on rotating magnetoconvection and a geodynamo model . Astron Nachr 326:245--249. doi:10.1002/asna.200410384

2005 doi
[296]

Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dynam 101:81--116

Schrinner M, R \"a dler KH, Schmitt D, Rheinhardt M, Christensen UR (2007) Mean-field concept and direct numerical simulations of rotating magnetoconvection and the geodynamo . Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dynam 101:81--116. doi:10.1080/03091920701345707. https://arxiv.org/abs/astr...

2007 arXiv
[297]

530:A140

Schrinner M, Petitdemange L, Dormy E (2011) Oscillatory dynamos and their induction mechanisms . 530:A140. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201016372. https://arxiv.org/abs/1101.1837 arXiv:1101.1837 [astro-ph.SR]

2011 arXiv
[298]

Schrinner M, Petitdemange L, Dormy E (2012) Dipole Collapse and Dynamo Waves in Global Direct Numerical Simulations . 752:121. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/752/2/121. https://arxiv.org/abs/1202.4666 arXiv:1202.4666 [astro-ph.SR]

2012 arXiv
[299]

Reviews of Modern Physics 92(4):041001

Schumacher J, Sreenivasan KR (2020) Colloquium: Unusual dynamics of convection in the Sun . Reviews of Modern Physics 92(4):041001. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.92.041001

2020 doi
[300]

Von Herrn Hofrath Schwabe in Dessau

Schwabe H (1844) Sonnenbeobachtungen im Jahre 1843. Von Herrn Hofrath Schwabe in Dessau . Astron Nachr 21(15):233. doi:10.1002/asna.18440211505

doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Living Rev Sol Phys 17(1):1

Arlt R, Vaquero JM (2020) Historical sunspot records . Living Rev Sol Phys 17(1):1. doi:10.1007/s41116-020-0023-y

doi:10.1007/s41116-020-0023-y 2020

[2] [2]

Augustson K, Brun AS, Miesch M, Toomre J (2015) Grand Minima and Equatorward Propagation in a Cycling Stellar Convective Dynamo . 809:149. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/809/2/149. https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.6547 arXiv:1410.6547 [astro-ph.SR]

arXiv 2015

[3] [3]

Balbus SA, Hawley JF (1991) A Powerful Local Shear Instability in Weakly Magnetized Disks. I. Linear Analysis . 376:214. doi:10.1086/170270

doi:10.1086/170270 1991

[4] [4]

Physics of Plasmas 6(1):89--99

Balsara D, Pouquet A (1999) The formation of large-scale structures in supersonic magnetohydrodynamic flows . Physics of Plasmas 6(1):89--99. doi:10.1063/1.873263

work page doi:10.1063/1.873263 1999

[5] [5]

a pyl \"a MJ, K \

Barekat A, K \"a pyl \"a MJ, K \"a pyl \"a PJ, Gilson EP, Ji H (2021) Generation of mean flows in rotating anisotropic turbulence: The case of solar near-surface shear layer . 655:A79. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202040052. https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.06343 arXiv:2012.06343 [astro-ph.SR]

arXiv 2021

[6] [6]

AN 308:89--100

Baryshnikova I, Shukurov A (1987) Oscillatory alpha-squared dynamo - Numerical investigation . AN 308:89--100

1987

[7] [7]

826(2):138

Beaudoin P, Simard C, Cossette JF, Charbonneau P (2016) Double Dynamo Signatures in a Global MHD Simulation and Mean-field Dynamos . 826(2):138. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/138

work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/826/2/138 2016

[8] [8]

Astron Nachr 336(10):991

Bendre A, Gressel O, Elstner D (2015) Dynamo saturation in direct simulations of the multi-phase turbulent interstellar medium . Astron Nachr 336(10):991. doi:10.1002/asna.201512211. https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.04178 arXiv:1510.04178 [astro-ph.GA]

arXiv 2015