pith. sign in

arxiv: 2203.10270 · v2 · pith:ES7BRKEQnew · submitted 2022-03-19 · 🧮 math.AP · cs.NA· math.NA

Wavenumber-explicit parametric holomorphy of Helmholtz solutions in the context of uncertainty quantification

classification 🧮 math.AP cs.NAmath.NA
keywords helmholtzholomorphyparametricparametersganeshnontrappingsloansolution
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

A crucial role in the theory of uncertainty quantification (UQ) of PDEs is played by the regularity of the solution with respect to the stochastic parameters; indeed, a key property one seeks to establish is that the solution is holomorphic with respect to (the complex extensions of) the parameters. In the context of UQ for the high-frequency Helmholtz equation, a natural question is therefore: how does this parametric holomorphy depend on the wavenumber $k$? The recent paper [Ganesh, Kuo, Sloan 2021] showed for a particular nontrapping variable-coefficient Helmholtz problem with affine dependence of the coefficients on the stochastic parameters that the solution operator can be analytically continued a distance $\sim k^{-1}$ into the complex plane. In this paper, we generalise the result in [Ganesh, Kuo, Sloan 2021] about $k$-explicit parametric holomorphy to a much wider class of Helmholtz problems with arbitrary (holomorphic) dependence on the stochastic parameters; we show that in all cases the region of parametric holomorphy decreases with $k$, and show how the rate of decrease with $k$ is dictated by whether the unperturbed Helmholtz problem is trapping or nontrapping. We then give examples of both trapping and nontrapping problems where these bounds on the rate of decrease with $k$ of the region of parametric holomorphy are sharp, with the trapping examples coming from the recent results of [Galkowski, Marchand, Spence 2021]. An immediate implication of these results is that the $k$-dependent restrictions imposed on the randomness in the analysis of quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) methods in [Ganesh, Kuo, Sloan 2021] arise from a genuine feature of the Helmholtz equation with $k$ large (and not, for example, a suboptimal bound).

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.