Inference for Instrumental Variables: A Randomization Inference Approach
read the original abstract
The method of instrumental variables (IV) provides a framework to study causal effects in both randomized experiments with noncompliance and in observational studies where natural circumstances produce as-if random nudges to accept treatment. Traditionally, inference for IV relied on asymptotic approximations of the distribution of the Wald estimator or two-stage least squares, often with structural modeling assumptions and/or moment conditions. In this paper, we utilize the randomization inference approach to IV inference. First, we outline the exact method, which uses the randomized assignment of treatment in experiments as a basis for inference, but lacks a closed-form solution and may be computationally infeasible in many applications. We then provide an alternative to the exact method, the almost exact method, which is computationally feasible but retains the advantages of the exact method. We also review asymptotic methods of inference, including those associated with two-stage least squares, and analytically compare them to randomization inference methods. We also perform additional comparisons using a set of simulations. We conclude with three different applications from the social sciences.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Bracketing Relationships of Weighted Average Treatment Effects
Overlap-weighted ATE is bounded between ATT and ATC under monotonic PS-CATE relationship, with extensions to weighted LATE and other weights, recommending CP-plot of CATE vs PS.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.