pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.06871 · v1 · pith:EX6ENUHNnew · submitted 2019-07-16 · 🧮 math.NA · cs.NA

Global and local pointwise error estimates for finite element approximations to the Stokes problem on convex polyhedra

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 21:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.NA cs.NA
keywords finite element methodStokes problempointwise error estimatesstability estimatesGreen's functionsconvex polyhedraW1 infinity normL infinity norm
0
0 comments X

The pith

Finite element solutions of the Stokes problem achieve new pointwise stability and localization in W^{1,∞} and L^∞ norms on convex polyhedra.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes stability and localization results for finite element solutions of the Stokes equations in maximum norms. It extends stability estimates from regularized Green's functions to unstructured quasi-uniform meshes in two and three dimensions. These results provide interior error estimates that were previously known for elliptic problems but new for the Stokes system. A sympathetic reader would care because such estimates allow for better understanding of local behavior and pointwise accuracy without relying on structured meshes.

Core claim

The paper shows new stability and localization results for the finite element solution of the Stokes system in W^{1,∞} and L^∞ norms under standard assumptions on the finite element spaces on quasi-uniform meshes in two and three dimensions by extending previously known stability estimates using regularized Green's functions.

What carries the argument

Regularized Green's functions that extend stability estimates for the Stokes system to unstructured quasi-uniform meshes.

Load-bearing premise

The extension of previously known stability estimates for the Stokes system using regularized Green's functions is valid for the unstructured quasi-uniform meshes on convex polyhedra considered.

What would settle it

A specific finite element space and quasi-uniform mesh on a convex polyhedron where the W^{1,∞} or L^∞ stability estimate fails for the Stokes solution.

read the original abstract

The main goal of the paper is to show new stability and localization results for the finite element solution of the Stokes system in $W^{1,\infty}$ and $L^{\infty}$ norms under standard assumptions on the finite element spaces on quasi-uniform meshes in two and three dimensions. Although interior error estimates are well-developed for the elliptic problem, they appear to be new for the Stokes system on unstructured meshes. To obtain these results we extend previously known stability estimates for the Stokes system using regularized Green's functions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper claims to establish new global and local pointwise error estimates in the W^{1,∞} and L^∞ norms for finite element approximations to the Stokes problem on convex polyhedra. These results are obtained under standard assumptions on the finite element spaces and for quasi-uniform meshes in two and three dimensions by extending previously known stability estimates that employ regularized Green's functions. The estimates are presented as novel for the Stokes system on unstructured meshes, in contrast to existing interior estimates for elliptic problems.

Significance. If the extension of the regularized Green's function stability estimates is carried through rigorously, the results would provide useful new tools for pointwise and localized error analysis of Stokes finite element methods on general convex domains. This fills a gap relative to the elliptic case and could support the development of maximum-norm a posteriori estimators for incompressible flow problems. The manuscript explicitly builds on prior stability results rather than deriving everything from scratch, which is a strength.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the results are obtained 'under standard assumptions on the finite element spaces on quasi-uniform meshes' but does not name the precise inf-sup stable pairs considered; adding this in §1 or §2 would improve clarity.
  2. [Section 3] Notation for the regularized Green's function (likely introduced in §3) should be cross-referenced explicitly when the extension argument begins, to help readers track the adaptation from prior literature.
  3. [Section 4] A brief remark on how the convex-polyhedron assumption enters the Green's function estimates (e.g., via boundary regularity) would strengthen the exposition without altering the main argument.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript and the recommendation for minor revision. The summary correctly identifies the extension of regularized Green's function techniques to obtain new global and local pointwise estimates in W^{1,∞} and L^∞ norms for the Stokes system on convex polyhedra under standard assumptions on quasi-uniform meshes.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results obtained by extending prior stability estimates

full rationale

The paper derives its W^{1,∞} and L^∞ stability and localization results for the Stokes finite-element problem by extending previously known stability estimates that rely on regularized Green's functions. This extension is performed under the stated assumptions on the finite-element spaces and quasi-uniform meshes, with the abstract and description explicitly framing the contribution as this extension rather than any self-referential definition, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain. No equations or steps reduce the claimed results to the inputs by construction, and the derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks from prior literature.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only abstract available, so ledger is limited to explicitly mentioned assumptions; no free parameters, invented entities, or detailed axioms visible.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard assumptions on the finite element spaces
    Invoked as basis for the stability and localization results.
  • domain assumption Quasi-uniform meshes in two and three dimensions on convex polyhedra
    Required for the new estimates to hold.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5616 in / 1144 out tokens · 20350 ms · 2026-05-24T21:04:57.877248+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D. N. Arnold and X. Liu , Local error estimates for finite element discretizations of the Stokes equations, RAIRO Mod´ el. Math. Anal. Num´ er., 29 (1995), pp. 367–389, https://doi.org/ 10.1051/m2an/1995290303671

  2. [2]

    Chen , Pointwise error estimates for finite element solutions of th e Stokes problem , SIAM J

    H. Chen , Pointwise error estimates for finite element solutions of th e Stokes problem , SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 44 (2006), pp. 1–28, https://doi.org/10.1 137/S0036142903438100

  3. [3]

    Dauge, Stationary Stokes and Navier-Stokes systems on two- or thre e-dimensional domains with corners

    M. Dauge, Stationary Stokes and Navier-Stokes systems on two- or thre e-dimensional domains with corners. I. Linearized equations , SIAM J. Math. Anal., 20 (1989), pp. 74–97

  4. [4]

    J. C. de los Reyes and K. Kunisch , A semi-smooth Newton method for control constrained boundary optimal control of the Navier-Stokes equations , Nonlinear Anal., 62 (2005), pp. 1289–1316, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2005.04.0 35

  5. [6]

    J. C. de los Reyes, C. Meyer, and B. Vexler , Finite element error analysis for state- constrained optimal control of the Stokes equations , Control Cybernet., 37 (2008), pp. 251– 284

  6. [7]

    R. G. Dur ´an and M. A. Muschietti , An explicit right inverse of the divergence operator which is continuous in weighted norms , Studia Math., 148 (2001), pp. 207–219. 24 N. BEHRINGER, D. LEYKEKHMAN AND B. VEXLER

  7. [8]

    R. G. Dur ´an, R. H. Nochetto, and J. P. W ang , Sharp maximum norm error estimates for finite element approximations of the Stokes problem in 2-D, Math. Comp., 51 (1988), pp. 491–506, https://doi.org/10.2307/2008760

  8. [9]

    Ern and J

    A. Ern and J. Guermond , Theory and practice of finite elements , vol. 159 of Ap- plied Mathematical Sciences, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2 004, https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-1-4757-4355-5

  9. [10]

    G. P. Galdi , An introduction to the mathematical theory of the Navier-St okes equations , Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer, New York, se cond ed., 2011, https://doi. org/10.1007/978-0-387-09620-9. Steady-state problems

  10. [11]

    Girault, R

    V. Girault, R. H. Nochetto, and L. R. Scott , Maximum-norm stability of the finite element Stokes projection , J. Math. Pures Appl. (9), 84 (2005), pp. 279–330, https://d oi.org/10. 1016/j.matpur.2004.09.017

  11. [12]

    Girault, R

    V. Girault, R. H. Nochetto, and L. R. Scott , Max-norm estimates for Stokes and Navier- Stokes approximations in convex polyhedra , Numer. Math., 131 (2015), pp. 771–822

  12. [13]

    Guzm ´an and D

    J. Guzm ´an and D. Leykekhman , Pointwise error estimates of finite element approximations to the Stokes problem on convex polyhedra , Math. Comp., 81 (2012), pp. 1879–1902, https:// doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-2012-02603-2

  13. [14]

    Leykekhman and M

    D. Leykekhman and M. Pruitt , On the positivity of discrete harmonic functions and the discrete Harnack inequality for piecewise linear finite ele ments, Math. Comp., 86 (2017), pp. 1127–1145, https://doi.org/10.1090/mcom/3117

  14. [15]

    Leykekhman and B

    D. Leykekhman and B. Vexler , Finite element pointwise results on convex polyhedral domains, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 54 (2016), pp. 561–587, https://doi. org/10.1137/ 15M1013912

  15. [16]

    Leykekhman and B

    D. Leykekhman and B. Vexler , Pointwise best approximation results for Galerkin finite element solutions of parabolic problems , SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 54 (2016), pp. 1365–1384, https://doi.org/10.1137/15M103412X

  16. [17]

    Leykekhman and B

    D. Leykekhman and B. Vexler , Discrete maximal parabolic regularity for Galerkin fi- nite element methods , Numer. Math., 135 (2017), pp. 923–952, https://doi.org/1 0.1007/ s00211-016-0821-2

  17. [18]

    Leykekhman and B

    D. Leykekhman and B. Vexler , Global and interior pointwise best approximation results for the gradient of Galerkin solutions for parabolic proble ms, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 55 (2017), pp. 2025–2049, https://doi.org/10.1137/16M1080 252

  18. [19]

    Maz’ya and B

    V. Maz’ya and B. Plamenevskii , The first boundary value problem for classical equations of mathematical physics in domains with piecewise-smooth bou ndaries. I , Z. Anal. Anwen- dungen, 2 (1983), pp. 335–359, https://doi.org/10.4171/Z AA/71

  19. [20]

    Maz’ya and J

    V. Maz’ya and J. Rossmann , Lp estimates of solutions to mixed boundary value problems for the Stokes system in polyhedral domains , Math. Nachr., 280 (2007), pp. 751–793, https:// doi.org/10.1002/mana.200610513

  20. [21]

    Maz’ya and J

    V. Maz’ya and J. Rossmann , Elliptic equations in polyhedral domains , vol. 162 of Mathe- matical Surveys and Monographs, American Mathematical Soc iety, Providence, RI, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1090/surv/162

  21. [22]

    Narasimhan and I

    R. Narasimhan and I. Babuska , Interior maximum norm estimates for finite element dis- cretizations of the Stokes equations , Appl. Anal., 86 (2007), pp. 251–260, https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00036810601148240

  22. [23]

    Natterer , ¨Uber die punktweise Konvergenz finiter Elemente , Numer

    F. Natterer , ¨Uber die punktweise Konvergenz finiter Elemente , Numer. Math., 25 (1974), pp. 67–77, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01419529

  23. [24]

    Pieper and B

    K. Pieper and B. Vexler , A priori error analysis for discretization of sparse ellipt ic optimal control problems in measure space , SIAM J. Control Optim., 51 (2013), pp. 2788–2808, https://doi.org/10.1137/120889137

  24. [25]

    Rannacher , Zur L∞-Konvergenz linearer finiter Elemente beim Dirichlet-Prob lem, Math

    R. Rannacher , Zur L∞-Konvergenz linearer finiter Elemente beim Dirichlet-Prob lem, Math. Z., 149 (1976), pp. 69–77, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF013 01633

  25. [26]

    Rossmann , Green ’s matrix of the Stokes system in a convex polyhedron , Rostock

    J. Rossmann , Green ’s matrix of the Stokes system in a convex polyhedron , Rostock. Math. Kolloq., (2010), pp. 15–28

  26. [27]

    A. H. Schatz , A weak discrete maximum principle and stability of the finite element method in L∞ on plane polygonal domains. I , Math. Comp., 34 (1980), pp. 77–91, https://doi. org/10.2307/2006221

  27. [28]

    A. H. Schatz and L. B. W ahlbin , Interior maximum norm estimates for finite element methods, Math. Comp., 31 (1977), pp. 414–442, https://doi.org/10. 2307/2006424

  28. [29]

    A. H. Schatz and L. B. W ahlbin , Interior maximum-norm estimates for finite element meth- ods. II , Math. Comp., 64 (1995), pp. 907–928, https://doi.org/10. 2307/2153476