Some Patterns of Research in Mathematics
classification
🧮 math.HO
keywords
grownmathematicalpatternsresearchalthoughauthorschangedco-authorship
read the original abstract
We partially update Grossman's 2005 survey of patterns in mathematical research using a sample of 401 profiles from MathSciNet. The mathematical landscape has changed substantially: single-paper authors have reduced from $43$ \% to $32.42$ \%, collaboration has intensified, and the giant component of the co-authorship network has grown denser, with median Erd\H{o}s number dropping from $5$ to $4$. The data reveal the profession as markedly more collaborative, particularly among younger generations, although the tail of high productivity has also grown more extreme.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.