Criteria for the presence of the maximal ideal in the set of associated primes
Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 07:23 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Combinatorial criteria detect the maximal ideal among associated primes of monomial ideal powers.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
We establish some criteria to detect the presence of the maximal ideal (x1, …, xn) in the set of associated primes of powers of monomial ideals in the polynomial ring K[x1, …, xn]. For each criterion we provide examples showing its use.
What carries the argument
The combinatorial criteria derived from the monomial generators that indicate membership of the maximal ideal in Ass(I^k) for powers k.
If this is right
- If a criterion is satisfied, the maximal ideal belongs to the associated primes of some power of the ideal.
- These criteria apply to any monomial ideal and can be checked directly from its minimal generators.
- Examples demonstrate that the criteria correctly identify cases where the maximal ideal is or is not present.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The criteria may reduce the computational cost of checking associated primes in systems that handle monomial ideals.
- Similar ideas could apply to detecting other specific primes in associated prime sets beyond the maximal one.
- These tests might help classify monomial ideals based on the asymptotic behavior of their associated primes.
Load-bearing premise
The proofs and criteria depend on the monomial structure allowing combinatorial analysis of the exponents in the generators.
What would settle it
A specific monomial ideal where the listed criteria all fail to indicate presence yet the maximal ideal still appears in the associated primes of some power, or where a criterion indicates presence but it does not occur.
read the original abstract
In this paper, we establish some criteria to detect the presence of the maximal ideal $(x_1, \ldots, x_n)$ in the set of associated primes of powers of monomial ideals in the polynomial ring $K[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$. Furthermore, for each of these criteria, we illustrate its applicability with corresponding examples.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper establishes criteria, based on the combinatorial structure of monomial ideals, for detecting when the maximal ideal m=(x1,...,xn) lies in Ass(I^k) for a monomial ideal I in K[x1,...,xn]. Each criterion is accompanied by explicit examples illustrating its use.
Significance. If the criteria hold, they supply concrete, combinatorially checkable tests that build directly on standard tools such as primary decomposition and colon ideals for monomials. This adds a practical layer to the existing theory of associated primes of ideal powers and may streamline computations in monomial ideal theory.
minor comments (2)
- A brief concluding paragraph or table that collects the criteria in one place would improve readability and allow readers to compare them quickly.
- Notation for the maximal ideal and the set Ass(I^k) is introduced in the abstract but should be restated explicitly at the beginning of the main text for self-contained reading.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their positive summary of the paper and for recommending minor revision. No specific major comments were raised in the report.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity; derivation self-contained on standard monomial ideal theory
full rationale
The paper claims to establish combinatorial criteria for detecting when the maximal ideal lies in Ass(I^k) for monomial ideals I in K[x1,...,xn]. These criteria are illustrated by examples and rest on standard tools (primary decomposition, colon ideals for monomials) without any self-definitional loops, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central claim to prior author work by construction. The derivation chain is independent of the target result and externally grounded in commutative algebra, yielding no circular steps.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- standard math Standard properties of associated primes and monomial ideals in polynomial rings over fields
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
M. F. Atiyah and I. G. Macdonald, Introduction to Commutative Algebra, Addison- Wesley, Reading, MA, 1969
work page 1969
-
[2]
S. Bandari, J. Herzog, and T. Hibi,Monomial ideals whose depth function has any given number of strict local maxima,Ark. Mat.52(2014), no. 1, 11–19
work page 2014
-
[3]
Brodmann,Asymptotic stability ofAss(M/I nM),Proc
M. Brodmann,Asymptotic stability ofAss(M/I nM),Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.74 (1979), 16–18
work page 1979
-
[4]
J. Chen, S. Morey, and A. Sung,The stable set of associated primes of the ideal of a graph, Rocky Mountain J. Math.32(2002), no. 1, 71–89. CRITERIA FOR THE PRESENCE OF THE MAXIMAL IDEAL 11
work page 2002
-
[5]
D. R. Grayson and M. E. Stillman, Macaulay2, a software system for research in algebraic geometry,http://www.math.uiuc.edu/Macaulay2/
-
[6]
H. T. H` a and S. Morey,Embedded associated primes of powers of square-free mono- mial ideals,J. Pure Appl. Algebra214(2010), 301–308
work page 2010
-
[7]
H. T. H´ a, H. D. Nguyen, N. V. Trung, and T. N. Trung,Depth functions of powers of homogeneous ideals,Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.149(2021), no. 5, 1837–1844
work page 2021
-
[8]
J. Herzog and T. Hibi,The depth of powers of an ideal,J. Algebra291(2005), 534–550
work page 2005
- [9]
-
[10]
K. Matsuda, T. Suzuki, and A. Tsuchiya,Nonincreasing depth functions of mono- mial ideals,Glasg. Math. J.60(2018), no. 2, 505–511
work page 2018
-
[11]
W. F. Moore, M. Rogers, and S. Sather-Wagstaff, Monomial ideals and their decom- positions. Universitext. Springer, Cham, 2018. xxiv+387 pp
work page 2018
-
[12]
M. Nasernejad, S. Bandari, and L. G. Roberts,Normality and associated primes of closed neighborhood ideals and dominating ideals, J. Algebra Appl.24(2025), no. 1, Paper No. 2550009
work page 2025
-
[13]
M. Nasernejad, V. Crispin Qui˜ nonez, and J. Toledo,Normally torsion-freeness and normality criteria for monomial ideals, Contemp. Math.826(2025), 263–283
work page 2025
-
[14]
M. Nasernejad, K. Khashyarmanesh, and I. Al-Ayyoub,Associated primes of powers of cover ideals under graph operations,Comm. Algebra,47(2019), no. 5, 1985–1996
work page 2019
-
[15]
M. Nasernejad and K. Khashyarmanesh,On the Alexander dual of the path ideals of rooted and unrooted trees,Comm. Algebra45(2017), 1853–1864
work page 2017
-
[16]
M. Nasernejad, K. Khashyarmanesh, L. G. Roberts, and J. Toledo,The strong persistence property and symbolic strong persistence property,Czechoslovak Math. J.,72(147)(2022), no. 1, 209–237
work page 2022
-
[17]
M. Nasernejad, A. A. Qureshi, S. Bandari, and A. Musapa¸ sao˘ glu,Dominating ideals and closed neighborhood ideals of graphs, Mediterr. J. Math.19(2022), no. 4, Paper No. 152, 18 pp
work page 2022
-
[18]
M. Nasernejad, A. A. Qureshi, K. Khashyarmanesh, and L. G. Roberts,Classes of normally and nearly normally torsion-free monomial ideals, Comm. Algebra,50(9) (2022), 3715–3733
work page 2022
-
[19]
M. Nasernejad and S. Rajaee,Detecting the maximal-associated prime ideal of mono- mial ideals,Bol. Soc. Mat. Mex. (3)25(2019), no. 3, 543–549
work page 2019
-
[20]
R. Rissner and I. Swanson,Fluctuations in depth and associated primes of powers of ideals,Ark. Mat.62(2024), no. 1, 191–215
work page 2024
-
[21]
M. Sayedsadeghi, M. Nasernejad, and A. A. Qureshi,On the embedded associated primes of monomial ideals,Rocky Mountain J. Math.52(2022), no. 1, 275–287
work page 2022
-
[22]
R. Y. Sharp, Steps in commutative algebra, London Mathematical Society Student Texts19. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990), 2nd edition (2000)
work page 1990
-
[23]
R. H. Villarreal, Monomial Algebras. 2nd. Edition, Monographs and Research Notes in Mathematics, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2015
work page 2015
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.