Toward formalizing ologs: Linguistic structures, instantiations, and mappings
classification
🧮 math.CT
keywords
ologslinguisticnotionfunctormathsfphrasesspivakthen
read the original abstract
We define the notion of linguistic structure on a small category, in order to provide a more formal description of ontology logs, also known as ologs, introduced by R. E. Kent and D. I. Spivak in their paper "Ologs: A categorical framework for knowledge representation." In particular, we construct a bicategory $\mathsf{Eng}$, of English noun phrases and verb phrases, endorsed as functional by varying sets of authors. An olog is then defined as a lax functor to $\mathsf{Eng}$. We then present a new notion of linguistic functor, which extends Spivak's notion of meaningful functors. Finally, we discuss the relationship between ologs and databases in this context.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.