Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 48 references

Phase-change metasurfaces for reconfigurable image processing

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single phase-change metasurface can switch between edge detection and bright-field imaging in visible light.

desk verdict A credible visible-band switchable metasurface design for edge detection versus bright-field imaging, but the 'demonstration' is Fourier-filter simulation using amplitude-only transfer functions, not a full-wave imaging validation. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.16856 v1 pith:F2XC2EKM submitted 2024-12-22 physics.optics

Tingting Liu , Jumin Qiu , Tianbao Yu , Qiegen Liu , Jie Li , Shuyuan Xiao This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords phase-changemetasurfacesMieresonancesangulardispersionengineeringedgedetectionbright-fieldimagingSb2S3nonlocalvisiblespectrum
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

An optical metasurface made of the phase-change material Sb2S3 can be switched between two image-processing modes in the visible spectrum, the paper argues. In its amorphous state the device acts as a Laplacian high-pass filter, sharpening the edges of any input image; after the material crystallizes, it becomes an all-pass filter that reproduces the original bright-field image. The switch is driven by the large refractive-index change between the two states, which reshapes the angular dispersion of electric and magnetic Mie resonances in the nanobricks. The authors verify the scheme with full-wave transmission simulations and Fourier image-processing simulations, including traffic-sign images, and show that the device works without a 4f lens system. A compact, reconfigurable optical processor of this kind would be directly useful in computer vision, for example in autonomous vehicles.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the optical transfer function $T(k_\parallel)$, the device's transmission as a function of in-plane wavevector. The hexagonal lattice of Sb2S3 nanobricks has C6 symmetry, so the transmission profile is polarization-independent and isotropic in the $k_x$–$k_y$ plane. By placing magnetic and electric Mie resonances at 652 nm and 689 nm in the amorphous state, the metasurface realizes $T\propto k_\parallel^2$ for low wavevectors, a Laplacian filter; by switching to the crystalline state, where the index contrast is smaller and losses appear ($k\approx 0.15$), the resonances weaken and $T$ becomes approximately constant. One geometric design thereby satisfies both transfer functions, which is what allows the two image-processing modes to coexist in a single device.

What would settle it

Measure the complex optical transfer function of a fabricated Sb2S3 metasurface at 652 nm and 689 nm by interferometric or ptychographic imaging, and compare the phase and amplitude response against the $|t|(\theta)$ fits; if an edge-detection experiment on a resolution chart does not show the predicted isotropic high-contrast edges in the amorphous state and faithful reproduction in the crystalline state, the claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that one Sb2S3 metasurface can act as two different spatial filters in the visible. At 652 nm and 689 nm, the amorphous-state metasurface has sharp electric and magnetic Mie resonances, with normal-incidence transmission below 1%; its transmission amplitude rises with angle as $|t|=A\sin^2\theta$, giving the quadratic transfer function $T(k_\parallel)\propto k_\parallel^2$ of an ideal Laplacian differentiator over an angular range up to $\theta\approx 10^\circ$ (NA $\approx 0.17$, resolution $\approx 2.4\,\mu\mathrm{m}$). In the crystalline state the same metasurface has a nearly flat transmission around 0.3 over all angles, so it preserves the incoming spatial frequencies and the output reproduces the original image. The image processing is computed as $E_{\mathrm{out}} = \mathrm{IFT}\{T(k_x,k_y)\,\mathrm{FT}[E_{\mathrm{in}}]\}$, and the paper shows this yields isotropic edge detection on stripes, arbitrary shapes, and traffic signs in the amorphous state, while the crystalline state delivers uniform bright-field imaging. The design therefore demonstrates reconfigurable analog image processing in a flat, 4f-less component.

Load-bearing premise

The predicted images come from treating one unit cell's plane-wave transmission amplitude as the full linear, shift-invariant transfer function of the metasurface; if phase variations or near-field coupling matter, the switching behavior will differ.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At 652 nm and 689 nm the same device performs isotropic edge detection in the amorphous state and faithful bright-field imaging in the crystalline state.
  • Edge detection works in a 4f-less configuration, so the analog image processor can shrink to a flat metasurface.
  • The switch is reversible because the refractive index of Sb2S3 can be toggled repeatedly by thermal, electrical, or optical stimulus.
  • Edge contrast reaches roughly ten times the background level, which is high enough for subsequent recognition tasks.
  • Traffic-sign inputs show clearly enhanced circles, arrows, and pedestrians, supporting use in computer vision for autonomous driving.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same angular-dispersion strategy should transfer to other low-loss phase-change materials such as Sb2Se3, since the mechanism only requires a large refractive-index contrast between the two states.
  • Because the simulations use scalar plane-wave transmission without phase information, a real device may show degraded edge contrast; measuring the complex transfer function would settle how close the prediction comes.
  • Partial crystallization, which the paper does not discuss, would presumably give intermediate filter strengths, turning the binary switch into a continuously tunable spatial filter.
  • In an autonomous-driving pipeline, the bright-field and edge outputs could be routed to separate detectors and used as complementary inputs to a recognition network.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a Sb2S3-based phase-change metasurface that aims to dynamically switch between edge detection and bright-field imaging at visible wavelengths. The design is a hexagonal array of Sb2S3 nanobricks on a glass substrate; in the amorphous state, Mie-type resonances at 652 nm and 689 nm produce a transmission amplitude |t| ≈ A sin^2(theta), which the authors interpret as a second-order spatial high-pass filter for isotropic edge detection. In the crystalline state, the transmission amplitude is nearly angle-independent, serving as an all-pass filter for bright-field imaging. The authors support the design with FDTD simulations, multipolar decomposition of the resonances, and Fourier-domain image simulations that show edge-enhanced and unmodified output images for the two states. The central claim is that this metasurface enables reconfigurable image processing in the visible without a 4f lens system.

Significance. The work addresses a timely problem in reconfigurable optical image processing and extends the approach to the visible spectrum using the relatively low-loss phase-change material Sb2S3. The design concept of engineering angular dispersion through Mie resonances is sound, and the numerical results are internally consistent: the FDTD transmission spectra, multipolar decomposition, and the computed output images agree with each other. The paper also benefits from using experimentally measured refractive-index data. However, the imaging demonstrations are computed from plane-wave transfer amplitudes rather than from direct full-wave simulations of the device under image illumination, and the phase of the transmission coefficient is not reported. These gaps currently temper the strength of the central claim, but they are addressable within the manuscript's scope and do not invalidate the underlying design idea.

major comments (3)
  1. [Imaging simulation, paragraph beginning 'To verify the reconfigurable image processing functionality' (Figs. 4-6)] The output images are computed as Eout = IFT{T(kx,ky) FT[Ein]} with T taken as the transmission amplitude |t| shown in Fig. 3, not the complex transmission coefficient. The ideal Laplacian transfer function is T(k) = -k^2, which is real and carries a pi phase shift; if the phase of the actual transmission coefficient varies with angle, the image outputs will differ from those displayed. The manuscript reports no phase data for any of the four cases (amorphous/crystalline at 652/689 nm). Please provide the phase of t over the angular range and either use the complex T in the image pipeline or quantitatively justify that the phase is effectively flat. Without this, the predicted edge-detection and bright-field images are not fully determined.
  2. [Imaging simulation and lattice parameters (Fig. 2, Fig. 4-6)] The manuscript claims a '4f-less' imaging configuration, but the imaging results are obtained by multiplying the input angular spectrum by a plane-wave transfer function, not by simulating light propagation through the metasurface with the actual image field. This linear shift-invariant model assumes that each angular component interacts independently and that no near-field coupling or higher-order diffraction occurs. The lattice period a=500 nm exceeds the substrate wavelength lambda/n_substrate ≈ 435 nm at 652 nm, so higher-order Floquet-Bloch modes may propagate in the glass substrate and carry signal. Please provide a full-wave simulation with a finite-sized incident beam (or a supercell containing a structured object) to validate that the convolution model reproduces the actual transmitted field, or quantitatively show that higher-order diffraction orders are negligible.
  3. [Abstract and title] The abstract and title state that the paper 'demonstrates' reconfigurable image processing, but the manuscript contains only numerical simulations. If no experimental data are provided, the claims should be revised to 'propose and numerically demonstrate' or an experimental section should be added. This is a substantive mismatch between the claimed and provided evidence.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Angular dispersion section, Fig. 3] The fit expression '|t|fit = Asinθ2' should be written as |t|fit = A sin^2(theta) with proper superscript formatting, and the numerical aperture should be defined explicitly (likely NA = sin(theta)).
  2. [Throughout] The phase of the transmission coefficient is never mentioned; even a brief qualitative statement about the expected phase flatness would help the reader assess the validity of the amplitude-only transfer function.
  3. [References] The reference list contains duplicated entries: Ref. 27 repeats the same author list twice, and Ref. 45 does the same. Some references lack complete page numbers or DOIs (e.g., Refs. 8, 9, 29).
  4. [Figures 4-6] The image simulations are limited to simple test charts and geometric shapes; showing a continuous-tone image would provide a more stringent test of the isotropic edge-detection claim.
  5. [Crystalline-state flatness, Fig. 3(c,f)] For the crystalline state, the transmission amplitude varies from about 0.5 to 0.6 across the angular range, which is a roughly 20% amplitude variation. The authors should quantify the resulting image intensity nonuniformity and explain why it does not degrade the bright-field fidelity.
  6. [Introduction and conclusion] The paper does not quantitatively compare its angular bandwidth, resolution (2.4 µm), and switching contrast with those of previous reconfigurable image-processing metasurfaces (e.g., Refs. 38 and 39); such a comparison would better frame the advance.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the simulated metasurface response and the image post-processing are distinct, and the final images are forward-modeled rather than fitted.

full rationale

The central derivation chain starts from experimentally measured refractive indices of Sb2S3 (Ref. 43), an external input, and FDTD simulations of the designed meta-atom lattice. The angle-dependent transmission amplitude in Fig. 3 is obtained directly from those simulations, not from the final output images. The imaging results are then computed with Eout = IFT{T(kx,ky) FT[Ein]}, applying that same simulated transfer function to test images; this is a standard forward-modeling consistency check, not a circular reduction, because T is not defined in terms of the outputs and no output image is used to infer T. The quadratic fit |t|fit = A sin^2(theta) only characterizes the simulated response and is not used to generate the displayed images. Self-citations (Refs. 10, 27, 47) appear in the literature review but are not load-bearing for the design or the imaging claim. The omission of the phase of the transmission coefficient and the plane-wave-to-image transfer-function assumption are accuracy/validity concerns, not circularity, and do not make the derivation equivalent to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The design rests on external material data (Ref. 43), on the assumed reversibility of Sb2S3 phase transitions, and on the Fourier-optics filter model used to compute output images. The optimized lattice parameters are free design parameters. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Unit cell period a = 500 nm
    Chosen by optimization so the amorphous state has two sharp resonances and the crystalline state is flat; not derived from first principles.
  • Nanobrick height h = 100 nm
    Optimized geometric parameter controlling resonance positions and angular response.
  • Nanobrick radius r = 160 nm
    Optimized geometric parameter controlling Mie resonance spectral positions and transmission contrast.
  • Fit amplitude A in |t| = A sin^2(theta) = not stated
    Fit coefficient used to characterize the quadratic angular transmission at 652 nm and 689 nm; fitted to simulated data in Figs. 3(a) and 3(d).
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The metasurface can be treated as a linear, shift-invariant spatial filter with transfer function T(kx,ky); output images are Eout = IFT{T FT[Ein]}.
    Invoked in the imaging simulation section; ignores near-field coupling and finite-aperture effects.
  • domain assumption The refractive indices of amorphous and crystalline Sb2S3 from Ref. 43 are accurate, including k=0 for a-Sb2S3 and k around 0.15 for c-Sb2S3.
    All FDTD results depend on these material data.
  • domain assumption Sb2S3 can be reversibly switched between amorphous and crystalline states with repeatable optical properties.
    Relies on Refs. 36, 37, and 41; no switching or cyclability measurement is performed in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Phase-change metasurfaces for reconfigurable image processing." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/F2XC2EKM

@misc{pith2026241216856,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Phase-change metasurfaces for reconfigurable image processing},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/F2XC2EKM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.16856}
}
abstract

Optical metasurfaces have enabled high-speed, low-power image processing within a compact footprint. However, reconfigurable imaging in such flat devices remains a critical challenge for fully harnessing their potential in practical applications. Here, we propose and demonstrate phase-change metasurfaces capable of dynamically switching between edge detection and bright-field imaging in the visible spectrum. This reconfigurability is achieved through engineering angular dispersion at electric and magnetic Mie-type resonances. The customized metasurface exhibits an angle-dependent transmittance profile in the amorphous state of Sb$_{2}$S$_{3}$ meta-atoms for efficient isotropic edge detection, and an angle-independent profile in the crystalline state for uniform bright-field imaging. The nanostructured Sb$_{2}$S$_{3}$-based reconfigurable image processing metasurfaces hold significant potential for applications in computer vision for autonomous driving systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.16856 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic of the Sb [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Schematic of a unit cell of the metasurface with op [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Angular dispersion of the metasurface at resonant wav [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Imaging results of a test chart and the corresponding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Imaging results of different shapes at resonant wavele [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Input and output images of two common traffic signs at re [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author author D. R. \ Solli \ and\ author B. Jalali ,\ title title Analog optical computing , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2015.208 journal journal Nat. Photonics \ volume 9 ,\ pages 704--706 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/nphoton.2015.208 2015

  2. [2]

    Wu , author X

    author author J. Wu , author X. Lin , author Y. Guo , author J. Liu , author L. Fang , author S. Jiao ,\ and\ author Q. Dai ,\ title title Analog optical computing for artificial intelligence , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2021.06.021 journal journal Engineering \ volume 10 ,\ pages 133--145 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/j.eng.2021.06.021

  3. [3]

    Wang , author P

    author author S. Wang , author P. C. \ Wu , author V.-C. \ Su , author Y.-C. \ Lai , author M.-K. \ Chen , author H. Y. \ Kuo , author B. H. \ Chen , author Y. H. \ Chen , author T.-T. \ Huang , author J.-H. \ Wang , author R.-M. \ Lin , author C.-H. \ Kuan , author T. Li , author Z. Wang , author S. Zhu ,\ and\ author D. P. \ Tsai ,\ title title A broadb...

    doi:10.1038/s41565-017-0052-4

  4. [4]

    Yao , author F

    author author J. Yao , author F. Lai , author Y. Fan , author Y. Wang , author S.-H. \ Huang , author B. Leng , author Y. Liang , author R. Lin , author S. Chen , author M. K. \ Chen , author P. C. \ Wu , author S. Xiao ,\ and\ author D. P. \ Tsai ,\ title title Nonlocal meta-lens with huygens’ bound states in the continuum , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-50965-y

  5. [5]

    Li , author X

    author author J. Li , author X. Lu , author H. Li , author C. Song , author Q. Tan , author Y. He , author J. Liu , author L. Luo , author T. Tang , author T. Liu , author H. Xu , author S. Xiao , author W. Huang , author Y. Shen , author Y. Zhang , author Y. Zhang ,\ and\ author J. Yao ,\ title title Racemic dielectric metasurfaces for arbitrary terahert...

    work page arXiv

  6. [6]

    Mei , author G

    author author F. Mei , author G. Qu , author X. Sha , author J. Han , author M. Yu , author H. Li , author Q. Chen , author Z. Ji , author J. Ni , author C.-W. \ Qiu , author Q. Song , author Y. Kivshar ,\ and\ author S. Xiao ,\ title title Cascaded metasurfaces for high-purity vortex generation , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-42137-1 journal journ...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-023-42137-1

  7. [7]

    Gou , author H

    author author Y. Gou , author H. W. \ Tian , author Z. X. \ Wang , author T. Y. \ Zhang , author S. Sun , author S. Zheng , author T. J. \ Cui ,\ and\ author H. F. \ Ma ,\ title title Generation of arbitrarily programmable vector vortex beams based on spin‐independent metasurface , \ https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.202400700 journal journal Laser Photonics R...

    work page doi:10.1002/lpor.202400700

  8. [8]

    Yang , author K

    author author H. Yang , author K. Ou , author H. Wan , author Y. Hu , author Z. Wei , author H. Jia , author X. Cheng , author N. Liu ,\ and\ author H. Duan ,\ title title Metasurface-empowered optical cryptography , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2023.06.003 journal journal Mater. Today \ volume 67 ,\ pages 424--445 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2023.06.003

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Yin , author Q

    author author Y. Yin , author Q. Jiang , author H. Wang ,\ and\ author L. Huang ,\ title title Color holographic display based on complex‐amplitude metasurface , \ https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.202400884 journal journal Laser Photonics Rev. \ ,\ pages 2400884 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    doi

  2. [10]

    Liu , author D

    author author T. Liu , author D. Zhang , author W. Liu , author T. Yu , author F. Wu , author S. Xiao , author L. Huang ,\ and\ author A. E. \ Miroshnichenko ,\ title title Phase-change nonlocal metasurfaces for dynamic wave-front manipulation , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/physr...

    doi

  3. [11]

    He , author R

    author author S. He , author R. Wang ,\ and\ author H. Luo ,\ title title Computing metasurfaces for all-optical image processing: a brief review , \ https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2021-0823 journal journal Nanophotonics \ volume 11 ,\ pages 1083--1108 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  4. [12]

    Zhou , author H

    author author J. Zhou , author H. Qian , author C.-F. \ Chen , author J. Zhao , author G. Li , author Q. Wu , author H. Luo , author S. Wen ,\ and\ author Z. Liu ,\ title title Optical edge detection based on high-efficiency dielectric metasurface , \ https://doi.org/10.1073/p...

    doi

  5. [13]

    He , author Y

    author author S. He , author Y. Shou , author D. Xu , author Q. Yang , author J. Liu , author S. Chen ,\ and\ author H. Luo ,\ title title High-order photonic spin hall effect and its application in high-contrast imaging , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevapplied.21.034045 jou...

    doi

  6. [14]

    Zhu , author Y

    author author T. Zhu , author Y. Zhou , author Y. Lou , author H. Ye , author M. Qiu , author Z. Ruan ,\ and\ author S. Fan ,\ title title Plasmonic computing of spatial differentiation , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15391 journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 8 ,\ pages 15...

    doi

  7. [15]

    Yang , author X

    author author W. Yang , author X. Yu , author J. Zhang ,\ and\ author X. Deng ,\ title title Plasmonic transmitted optical differentiator based on the subwavelength gold gratings , \ https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.390566 journal journal Opt. Lett. \ volume 45 ,\ pages 2295 ( year ...

    doi

  8. [16]

    Lou , author Y

    author author Y. Lou , author Y. Fang ,\ and\ author Z. Ruan ,\ title title Optical computation of divergence operation for vector fields , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevapplied.14.034013 journal journal Phys. Rev. Applied \ volume 14 ,\ pages 034013 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi

  9. [17]

    Kim , author G

    author author Y. Kim , author G. Lee , author J. Sung , author J. Jang ,\ and\ author B. Lee ,\ title title Spiral metalens for phase contrast imaging , \ https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202106050 journal journal Adv. Funct. Mater. \ volume 32 ,\ pages 2106050 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    doi

  10. [18]

    Zong , author Y

    author author M. Zong , author Y. Liu , author J. Lv , author S. Zhang ,\ and\ author Z. Xu ,\ title title Two-dimensional optical differentiator for broadband edge detection based on dielectric metasurface , \ https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.483415 journal journal Opt. Lett. \ vol...

    doi

  11. [19]

    Zhang , author P

    author author Y. Zhang , author P. Lin , author P. Huo , author M. Liu , author Y. Ren , author S. Zhang , author Q. Zhou , author Y. Wang , author Y.-q. \ Lu ,\ and\ author T. Xu ,\ title title Dielectric metasurface for synchronously spiral phase contrast and bright-field im...

    doi

  12. [20]

    Zhou , author H

    author author Y. Zhou , author H. Zheng , author I. I. \ Kravchenko ,\ and\ author J. Valentine ,\ title title Flat optics for image differentiation , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-020-0591-3 journal journal Nat. Photonics \ volume 14 ,\ pages 316--323 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi

  13. [21]

    Pan , author L

    author author D. Pan , author L. Wan , author M. Ouyang , author W. Zhang , author A. A. \ Potapov , author W. Liu , author Z. Liang , author T. Feng ,\ and\ author Z. Li ,\ title title Laplace metasurfaces for optical analog computing based on quasi-bound states in the contin...

    doi

  14. [22]

    Komar , author R

    author author A. Komar , author R. A. \ Aoni , author L. Xu , author M. Rahmani , author A. E. \ Miroshnichenko ,\ and\ author D. N. \ Neshev ,\ title title Edge detection with mie-resonant dielectric metasurfaces , \ https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.0c01874 journal journa...

    doi

  15. [23]

    Ji , author J.-H

    author author A. Ji , author J.-H. \ Song , author Q. Li , author F. Xu , author C.-T. \ Tsai , author R. C. \ Tiberio , author B. Cui , author P. Lalanne , author P. G. \ Kik , author D. A. B. \ Miller ,\ and\ author M. L. \ Brongersma ,\ title title Quantitative phase contra...

    doi

  16. [24]

    Cotrufo , author A

    author author M. Cotrufo , author A. Arora , author S. Singh ,\ and\ author A. Alù ,\ title title Dispersion engineered metasurfaces for broadband, high-na, high-efficiency, dual-polarization analog image processing , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-42921-z journal journa...

    doi

  17. [25]

    Cotrufo , author S

    author author M. Cotrufo , author S. Singh , author A. Arora , author A. Majewski ,\ and\ author A. Alù ,\ title title Polarization imaging and edge detection with image-processing metasurfaces , \ https://doi.org/10.1364/optica.500121 journal journal Optica \ volume 10 ,\ pag...

    doi

  18. [26]

    Zhou , author Y

    author author C. Zhou , author Y. Chen , author Y. Li , author J. Li , author R. Zhao , author C. Tao , author C. Liu , author Y. Bai , author X. Li , author Y. Wang ,\ and\ author L. Huang ,\ title title Laplace differentiator based on metasurface with toroidal dipole resonan...

    doi

  19. [27]

    Liu , author J

    author author T. Liu , author J. Qiu , author L. Xu , author M. Qin , author L. Wan , author T. Yu , author Q. Liu , author L. Huang , author S. Xiao , author T. Liu , author J. Qiu , author L. Xu , author M. Qin , author L. Wan , author T. Yu , author Q. Liu , author L. Huang...

    doi

  20. [28]

    Wang , author L

    author author S. Wang , author L. Li , author S. Wen , author R. Liang , author Y. Liu , author F. Zhao ,\ and\ author Y. Yang ,\ title title Metalens for accelerated optoelectronic edge detection under ambient illumination , \ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c04112 jour...

    doi

  21. [29]

    Chen , author Z.-X

    author author J. Chen , author Z.-X. \ Chen , author J.-L. \ Kou , author Y.-Q. \ Lu , author J. Chen , author Z.-X. \ Chen , author J.-L. \ Kou ,\ and\ author Y.-Q. \ Lu ,\ title title Multifunctional imaging enabled by optical bound states in the continuum with broken symmet...

    arXiv

  22. [30]

    Long , author Z

    author author A. Long , author Z. Xie , author H. Wu , author Q. Zeng , author P. Zhong , author J. Liu , author H. Ye , author D. Fan ,\ and\ author S. Chen ,\ title title Switchable optical differentiator using fano resonance metasurface , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom....

  23. [31]

    Momeni , author K

    author author A. Momeni , author K. Rouhi ,\ and\ author R. Fleury ,\ title title Switchable and simultaneous spatiotemporal analog computing with computational graphene-based multilayers , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2021.10.001 journal journal Carbon \ volume 186 ,\ p...

    doi

  24. [32]

    Xia , author J

    author author D. Xia , author J. Yang ,\ and\ author Q. Zhi ,\ title title Electrically tunable optical spatial differentiation with graphene , \ https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.498629 journal journal Opt. Express \ volume 31 ,\ pages 27312 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    doi

  25. [33]

    Khodasevych , author L

    author author I. Khodasevych , author L. Wesemann , author A. Roberts ,\ and\ author F. Iacopi ,\ title title Tunable nonlocal metasurfaces based on graphene for analogue optical computation , \ https://doi.org/10.1364/ome.484494 journal journal Opt. Mater. Express \ volume 13...

    doi

  26. [34]

    Xiao , author H

    author author T. Xiao , author H. Yang , author Q. Yang , author D. Xu , author R. Wang , author S. Chen ,\ and\ author H. Luo ,\ title title Realization of tunable edge-enhanced images based on computing metasurfaces , \ https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.450988 journal journal Opt. ...

    doi

  27. [35]

    Liu , author D

    author author S. Liu , author D. Zheng , author Q. Yang , author S. Chen , author S. Wen ,\ and\ author H. Luo ,\ title title Electrically-switched differential microscopy based on computing liquid-crystal platforms , \ https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2023-0688 journal journal ...

    doi

  28. [36]

    Ding , author Y

    author author F. Ding , author Y. Yang ,\ and\ author S. I. \ Bozhevolnyi ,\ title title Dynamic metasurfaces using phase‐change chalcogenides , \ https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201801709 journal journal Adv. Opt. Mater. \ volume 7 ,\ pages 1801709 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    doi

  29. [37]

    Xiao , author T

    author author S. Xiao , author T. Wang , author T. Liu , author C. Zhou , author X. Jiang ,\ and\ author J. Zhang ,\ title title Active metamaterials and metadevices: a review , \ https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/abaced journal journal J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. \ volume 53 ,\ p...

    doi

  30. [38]

    Yang , author Z

    author author H. Yang , author Z. Xie , author H. He , author Q. Zhang , author J. Li , author Y. Zhang ,\ and\ author X. Yuan ,\ title title Switchable imaging between edge-enhanced and bright-field based on a phase-change metasurface , \ https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.428870 jou...

    doi

  31. [39]

    Cotrufo , author S

    author author M. Cotrufo , author S. B. \ Sulejman , author L. Wesemann , author M. A. \ Rahman , author M. Bhaskaran , author A. Roberts ,\ and\ author A. Alù ,\ title title Reconfigurable image processing metasurfaces with phase-change materials , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/s...

    doi

  32. [40]

    Heenkenda , author K

    author author R. Heenkenda , author K. Hirakawa ,\ and\ author A. Sarangan ,\ title title Tunable optical filter using phase change materials for smart ir night vision applications , \ https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.440299 journal journal Opt. Express \ volume 29 ,\ pages 33795 ( ...

    doi

  33. [41]

    Dong , author H

    author author W. Dong , author H. Liu , author J. K. \ Behera , author L. Lu , author R. J. H. \ Ng , author K. V. \ Sreekanth , author X. Zhou , author J. K. W. \ Yang ,\ and\ author R. E. \ Simpson ,\ title title Wide bandgap phase change material tuned visible photonics , \...

    doi

  34. [42]

    Delaney , author I

    author author M. Delaney , author I. Zeimpekis , author D. Lawson , author D. W. \ Hewak ,\ and\ author O. L. \ Muskens ,\ title title A new family of ultralow loss reversible phase‐change materials for photonic integrated circuits: Sb2s3 and sb2se3 , \ https://doi.org/10.1002...

    doi

  35. [43]

    Lu , author Z

    author author L. Lu , author Z. Dong , author F. Tijiptoharsono , author R. J. H. \ Ng , author H. Wang , author S. D. \ Rezaei , author Y. Wang , author H. S. \ Leong , author P. C. \ Lim , author J. K. W. \ Yang ,\ and\ author R. E. \ Simpson ,\ title title Reversible tuning...

    doi

  36. [44]

    Chen , author Y

    author author L. Chen , author Y. Hao , author L. Zhao , author R. Wu , author Y. Liu , author Z. Wei , author N. Xu , author Z. Li ,\ and\ author H. Liu ,\ title title Multifunctional metalens generation using bilayer all-dielectric metasurfaces , \ https://doi.org/10.1364/oe...

    doi

  37. [45]

    Hemmatyar , author S

    author author O. Hemmatyar , author S. Abdollahramezani , author S. Lepeshov , author A. Krasnok , author T. Brown , author A. Alu , author A. Adibi , author O. Hemmatyar , author S. Abdollahramezani , author S. Lepeshov , author A. Krasnok , author T. Brown , author A. Alu ,\...

    2021 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Moitra , author Y

    author author P. Moitra , author Y. Wang , author X. Liang , author L. Lu , author A. Poh , author T. W. \ Mass , author R. E. \ Simpson , author A. I. \ Kuznetsov ,\ and\ author R. Paniagua‐Dominguez ,\ title title Programmable wavefront control in the visible spectrum using ...

    doi

  39. [47]

    Liu , author Z

    author author T. Liu , author Z. Han , author J. Duan ,\ and\ author S. Xiao ,\ title title Phase-change metasurfaces for dynamic image display and information encryption , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevapplied.18.044078 journal journal Phys. Rev. Applied \ volume 18 ,\ pag...

    doi

  40. [48]

    author author W. T. \ Chen , author A. Y. \ Zhu , author V. Sanjeev , author M. Khorasaninejad , author Z. Shi , author E. Lee ,\ and\ author F. Capasso ,\ title title A broadband achromatic metalens for focusing and imaging in the visible , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-01...

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.