Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Logic BIST: State-of-the-Art and Open Problems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1503.04628 v1 pith:F4R5MXV7 submitted 2015-03-16 cs.AR

classification cs.AR
keywords lbisthoweverlogicmanyneedspracticeaddressedapplications
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Many believe that in-field hardware faults are too rare in practice to justify the need for Logic Built-In Self-Test (LBIST) in a design. Until now, LBIST was primarily used in safety-critical applications. However, this may change soon. First, even if costly methods like burn-in are applied, it is no longer possible to get rid of all latent defects in devices at leading-edge technology. Second, demands for high reliability spread to consumer electronics as smartphones replace our wallets and IDs. However, today many ASIC vendors are reluctant to use LBIST. In this paper, we describe the needs for successful deployment of LBIST in the industrial practice and discuss how these needs can be addressed. Our work is hoped to attract a wider attention to this important research topic.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools