On extremal results of multiplicative Zagreb indices of trees with given distance k-domination number
Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 13:53 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Trees with a given distance k-domination number attain sharp lower bound on Π₁ and upper bound on Π₂.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
For any tree with distance k-domination number equal to a fixed integer γ, the index Π₁ is bounded from below and Π₂ is bounded from above by quantities that depend only on γ and the order of the tree; both bounds are attained, and the trees that achieve them are completely characterized by their structural properties.
What carries the argument
The distance k-domination number, the smallest size of a vertex set such that every vertex lies at distance at most k from the set, which constrains the possible degree sequences of the tree while the multiplicative Zagreb indices are computed from those degrees.
If this is right
- The extremal trees for Π₁ are those that minimize the product of squared degrees while keeping the distance k-domination number fixed.
- The extremal trees for Π₂ are those that maximize the product, over all edges, of the product of the two endpoint degrees, again under the fixed domination number.
- Once the domination number is fixed, the bounds become explicit functions of that number and the number of vertices, allowing direct comparison across different trees.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The same constraint might be used to obtain extremal results for other degree-based indices on trees.
- The characterized trees could serve as test cases when studying how domination parameters interact with other graph invariants.
Load-bearing premise
The distance k-domination number partitions the set of all trees into classes inside which the extremal trees for the two indices can be identified by a finite list of structural features.
What would settle it
Any tree whose distance k-domination number equals the given value but whose Π₁ falls below the stated lower bound, or whose Π₂ exceeds the stated upper bound, would refute the claim.
read the original abstract
The first multiplicative Zagreb index $\Pi_1$ of a graph $G$ is the product of the square of every vertex degree, while the second multiplicative Zagreb index $\Pi_2$ is the product of the products of degrees of pairs of adjacent vertices. In this paper, we give sharp lower bound for $\Pi_1$ and upper bound for $\Pi_2$ of trees with given distance $k$-domination number, and characterize those trees attaining the bounds.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript claims to derive sharp lower bounds on the first multiplicative Zagreb index Π₁ and sharp upper bounds on the second multiplicative Zagreb index Π₂ for trees with a prescribed distance-k domination number γ_k, together with a complete structural characterization of the extremal trees attaining the bounds. The argument relies on exhaustive case analysis of the possible shapes of minimum distance-k dominating sets (paths with controlled pending leaves or stars) and direct computation of the indices under those configurations.
Significance. If the stated bounds and characterization hold, the work adds a concrete extremal result to the literature on multiplicative Zagreb indices under domination-type constraints on trees. The explicit exhibition of the extremal constructions and the verification that any structural deviation moves the index in the claimed direction constitute a falsifiable contribution; the approach is parameter-free once k and γ_k are fixed.
minor comments (2)
- The abstract and introduction should explicitly state the range of n and k for which the characterization holds (e.g., n ≥ some function of k and γ_k); the current wording leaves the boundary cases implicit.
- Notation for the distance-k domination number is introduced as γ_k but used interchangeably with γ_k(T) in later sections; a single consistent symbol would improve readability.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the positive summary, significance assessment, and recommendation to accept the manuscript. No major comments were raised.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity
full rationale
The paper derives sharp lower bounds on Π₁ and upper bounds on Π₂ for trees with fixed distance-k domination number via explicit structural characterization of extremal trees (paths with controlled pending leaves or stars) followed by direct computation of the indices on those constructions and verification that deviations increase or decrease the index. No parameter is fitted to data and then renamed as a prediction, no self-citation chain is load-bearing for the central claim, and no ansatz or uniqueness theorem is imported from prior work by the same authors. The argument is a standard case-analysis proof in extremal graph theory that is self-contained against the definitions of the indices and the domination number.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- standard math Graphs under consideration are finite, simple, undirected, and connected (trees).
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
B. Borovicanin, B. Furtula, On extremal Zagreb indices of trees with given domination number, Appl. Math. Comput 279 (2016) 208–218
work page 2016
-
[2]
Gutman, On the origin of two degree based topological indices, Bull
I. Gutman, On the origin of two degree based topological indices, Bull. Acad. Serbe Sci. Arts. (Cl. Sci. Math.) 146 (2014) 39-52
work page 2014
-
[3]
Gutman, Multiplicative Zagreb indices of trees
I. Gutman, Multiplicative Zagreb indices of trees. Bull, Soc. Math. Banja Luka 18 (2011)17-23
work page 2011
- [4]
- [5]
-
[6]
S.M. Hosamani, I. Gutman, Zagreb indices of transformation gra phs and total transformation graphs, Appl. Math. Comput 247 (2014) 1156-11 60
work page 2014
-
[7]
Y. Hu, X. Li, Y. Shi, T. Xu, I. Gutman, On molecular graphs with sma llest and greatest zeroth order general Randi index, MATCH Commun. Mat h. Comput. Chem 54 (2005) 425-434
work page 2005
-
[8]
A. Iranmanesh, M.A. Hosseinzadeh, I. Gutman, On multiplicative Z agreb in- dices of graphs, Iran. J. Math. Chem. 3 (2012) 145–154
work page 2012
-
[9]
Kazemi, Note on the multiplicative Zagreb indices, Discrete Appl
R. Kazemi, Note on the multiplicative Zagreb indices, Discrete Appl. Math. 198 (2016) 147–154. 14
work page 2016
-
[10]
J. Liu, Q. Zhang, Sharp upper bounds for multiplicative Zagreb in dices, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 68 (2012) 231–240
work page 2012
- [11]
-
[12]
L. Pei, X. Pan, Extremal values on Zagreb indices of trees with g iven distance k-domination number, J. Inequal. Appl. (2018) Paper No. 16, 17 pp
work page 2018
-
[13]
R. Todeschini, V. Consonni, New local vertex invariants and mole cular de- scriptors based on functions of the vertex degrees, MATCH Comm un. Math. Comput. Chem 64 (2010) 359-372
work page 2010
-
[14]
J. Topp. L. Volkmann, On packing and covering numbers of grap hs, Discrete Math. 96 (1991) 229-238
work page 1991
-
[15]
F. Wang, F. Belardo, A lower bound for the first Zagreb index an d its applica- tion, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 74 (2015) 35-56
work page 2015
-
[16]
S. Wang, B. Wei, Multiplicative Zagreb indices of k-trees, Discret e Appl. Math. 180 (2015) 168–175
work page 2015
-
[17]
S. Wang, C. Wang, L. Chen, J.B. Liu, On extremal multiplicative Za greb indices of trees with given number of vertices of maximum degree, Discrete Appl. Math. 227 (2017) 166–173
work page 2017
-
[18]
S. Wang, C. Wang, J.-B. Liu, On extremal multiplicative Zagreb ind ices of trees with given domination number, Appl. Math. Comput 332 (2018) 338–3 50
work page 2018
-
[19]
K. Xu, H. Hua, A unified approach to extremal multiplicative Zagr eb indices for trees, unicyclic and bicyclic graphs, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 68 (2012) 241-256
work page 2012
-
[20]
Zhou, Remarks on Zagreb indices, MATCH Commun
B. Zhou, Remarks on Zagreb indices, MATCH Commun. Math. Com put. Chem. 57 (2007) 591-596. 15
work page 2007
-
[21]
B. Zhou, I. Gutman, Further properties of Zagreb indices, MA TCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 54 (2005) 233-239. 16
work page 2005
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.