REVIEW 2 cited by
Goodman surgery and projectively Anosov flows
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We introduce a generalization of Goodman surgery to the category of projectively Anosov flows. This construction is performed along a knot that is simultaneously Legendrian and transverse for a supporting bi-contact structure. If the flow is Anosov there is a particular class of supporting bi-contact structures that induce Lorentzian metrics satisfying Barbot's criterion of hyperbolicity. Foulon and Hasselblatt construct new contact Anosov flows by surgery from a geodesic flow. We generalize their result showing that in any contact Anosov flow there is a family of Legendrian knots that can be used to produce new contact Anosov flows by surgery. Outside of the realm of Anosov flows we generate new examples of projectively Anosov flows on hyperbolic 3-manifolds. These flows contain an invariant submanifold of genus g>0. We also give some application to contact geometry: we interpret the bi-contact surgery in terms of classic contact-Legendrian surgery and admissible-inadmissible transverse surgery and we deduce some (hyper)tightness result for contact and transverse surgeries.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Infinite ECH Capacities and Anosov Flows
ECH capacities are infinite for cotangent disk bundles over genus at least two surfaces, obstructing oriented Anosov Hamiltonian flows in dimension four.
-
A Sm\"org\aa sbord of (bi)contact structures, Reeb flows and pseudo-Anosov flows
A rigidity theorem for bicontact geometry: a bitransverse Anosov Reeb flow forces the supporting Anosov flow to be skew and isotopically equivalent; the rest of the paper is an open-problem survey.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.