The Metacognitive Demands and Opportunities of Generative AI
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:F7BEZHXIrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Generative AI (GenAI) systems offer unprecedented opportunities for transforming professional and personal work, yet present challenges around prompting, evaluating and relying on outputs, and optimizing workflows. We argue that metacognition$\unicode{x2013}$the psychological ability to monitor and control one's thoughts and behavior$\unicode{x2013}$offers a valuable lens to understand and design for these usability challenges. Drawing on research in psychology and cognitive science, and recent GenAI user studies, we illustrate how GenAI systems impose metacognitive demands on users, requiring a high degree of metacognitive monitoring and control. We propose these demands could be addressed by integrating metacognitive support strategies into GenAI systems, and by designing GenAI systems to reduce their metacognitive demand by targeting explainability and customizability. Metacognition offers a coherent framework for understanding the usability challenges posed by GenAI, and provides novel research and design directions to advance human-AI interaction.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
"If You're Very Clever, No One Knows You've Used It": The Social Dynamics of Developing Generative AI Literacy in the Workplace
Hiding generative AI use to signal expertise reduces knowledge sharing and transparency among workplace colleagues.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.