Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 40 references

Doppler-free Selective Reflection spectroscopy of the $6s$ $^2S_{1/2} \to 7p$ $^2P_{3/2}$ transition of Cesium using a nanofabricated vapor cell

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper reports that selective reflection from a cesium nanocell resolves the hyperfine structure of the 6s–7p transition at 456 nm in a single beam pass, with lines about 30 times narrower than the Doppler width.

desk verdict A credible first demonstration of sub-Doppler selective-reflection spectroscopy on the 456 nm Cs transition in a nanocell; the accompanying C3 claim is plausible but under-supported. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.11548 v1 pith:FAHEHKJW submitted 2025-01-20 physics.atom-ph

Armen Sargsyan , Rodolphe Momier , David Sarkisyan This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-ph
keywords selectivereflectionspectroscopynanometricvaporcellcesium456nmtransitionhyperfinestructureDoppler-freevanderWaalsatom-surfaceinteractionC3coefficientsub-Dopplerlinewidth
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first Doppler-free selective-reflection spectroscopy of the cesium $6s\,^2S_{1/2} \to 7p\,^2P_{3/2}$ transition at 456 nm, performed in a sapphire nanocell with vapor thickness 150–500 nm. With a single beam pass, the hyperfine transitions $F_g=3,4 \to F_e=2,3,4,5$ appear as resonances of about 27 MHz, roughly 30 times narrower than the 880 MHz Doppler width. At thicknesses below 400 nm the resonances shift to the red, which the authors attribute to van der Waals atom-surface interaction and use to estimate $C_3 \approx 21.4$ kHz·$\mu$m$^3$. If correct, the work opens a route to high-resolution spectroscopy and surface-interaction measurements on blue and ultraviolet alkali transitions that are difficult to access with conventional saturated absorption.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the selective-reflection signal from a thin vapor slab treated as a Fabry–Perot microcavity formed by the two cell windows. The collected reflected field is $S_r \approx 2E_i t_{01}\Re\{r[1-\exp(2ikL)]I_{\mathrm{SR}}\}/|F|^2$, where $I_{\mathrm{SR}}$ is a velocity integral of the atomic polarization over the Maxwellian distribution; this geometry suppresses Doppler broadening because atoms moving perpendicular to the beam have $\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{v}=0$, while atoms moving along the beam collide with a window and are returned to the ground state. The relative line strengths are fixed by the 6j-symbol formula $S_{FF'}=(2F'+1)(2J+1){J\ J'\ 1 \brace F'\ F\ I}^2$, and the hyperfine frequencies are computed from the standard dipole and quadrupole Hamiltonian with constants taken from the literature.

What would settle it

Record the dSR line position as a function of cell thickness between 150 and 400 nm while simultaneously recording a saturated-absorption spectrum of the same 456 nm transition as a frequency reference; if the red shift does not follow $\Delta\nu \approx -16C_3/L^3$ with a single fitted coefficient, or if the shift persists at thicknesses above 400 nm where the van der Waals shift should be negligible, then the atom-surface attribution is not established.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that the selective-reflection signal from a nanometric-thin cesium vapor cell resolves the complete allowed hyperfine structure of the 456 nm $6s\,^2S_{1/2} \to 7p\,^2P_{3/2}$ transition in a single beam pass. At $L \approx 350$ nm and a vapor temperature of 200 °C, the derivative SR lines have a full width at half maximum of about 27 MHz, compared with a one-photon Doppler width of about 880 MHz, and the relative line intensities match the transition strengths computed from Wigner 6j symbols. The paper further observes a red shift of about 8 MHz at $L \approx 350$ nm and about 60 MHz at $L \approx 180$ nm, attributes the shift to the van der Waals atom-surface interaction, and estimates the interaction coefficient as $C_3 \approx 21.4$ kHz·$\mu$m$^3$; theoretical spectra computed from a thin-cell Fabry–Perot model agree with the measured line shapes.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the measured red shifts come almost entirely from the van der Waals interaction between cesium atoms and the sapphire windows, with $C_3 \approx 21.4$ kHz·$\mu$m$^3$ treated as a known estimate; if laser drift, scanning nonlinearity, or other surface effects contribute significantly, the shift-based interpretation is not supported.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The same nanocell geometry should resolve hyperfine structure on other weak blue and ultraviolet alkali transitions where conventional saturated absorption spectra are cluttered with crossover resonances.
  • Because the van der Waals red shift is observable already below 400 nm at 456 nm, this wavelength provides a more sensitive platform for measuring atom-surface interaction coefficients and for probing retardation effects.
  • The strong SR signal, several percent of the incident radiation at intensities up to 100 mW/cm², should allow detection of weak magnetically induced $\Delta F=\pm2$ Zeeman transitions and formation of electromagnetically induced transparency resonances with a second laser.
  • The same cell can be used for measurements of non-uniform magnetic fields with roughly 150 nm spatial resolution, using the dependence of the resolved hyperfine resonances on the field.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial: the single-pass velocity selection in the nanocell means the 456 nm SR spectra should be largely free of the crossover artifacts seen in saturated absorption, a property that could be tested directly by recording both spectra with the same laser scan.
  • Editorial: if the $C_3 \approx 21.4$ kHz·$\mu$m$^3$ estimate is right, applying the same technique to the 389 nm $8p$ transition of cesium should give even larger and cleaner surface shifts, making blue and ultraviolet transitions a practical readout for Casimir–Polder interactions.
  • Editorial: a decisive, self-consistent test would be to record a saturated-absorption reference on the same scan and fit the thickness dependence of the red shift to $\Delta\nu \approx -16C_3/L^3$ over many cell thicknesses; the paper reports consistency with this law but does not perform an independent fit.
  • Editorial: replacing the sapphire windows with glass nanocells could broaden access to this technique and extend it to wavelengths where sapphire transmission or birefringence is limiting.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports selective reflection (SR) spectroscopy of the 6s 2S1/2 → 7p 2P3/2 cesium transition at 456 nm using a nanometric vapor cell with thickness L in the 150–500 nm range. The authors obtain sub-Doppler dSR spectra with a linewidth of about 27 MHz, roughly 30 times narrower than the one-photon Doppler width, and resolve the Fg = 3,4 → Fe = 2,3,4,5 hyperfine components in a single beam pass. They also observe red shifts of the resonances for thinner cells, interpret them as van der Waals atom-surface shifts, and estimate C3 ≈ 21.4 kHz·µm3. A line-shape model based on Zambon-Nienhuis and Dutier et al. is used to compute SR and dSR spectra, which are compared with experiment.

Significance. If the central demonstration stands, this is a useful addition to thin-cell spectroscopy: it is the first SR study of this blue cesium transition in a nanocell, resolves all hyperfine components with a simple single-beam arrangement, and could enable spatially localized spectroscopy and magnetic-field measurements. The use of external hyperfine constants and Wigner 6j transition strengths to assign the lines is a strength, as is the inclusion of a theoretical model for the SR line shapes. The quantitative atom-surface claim, however, is not yet supported by the presented data because the observed shifts lack error bars and frequency calibration, and the C3 value is an order-of-magnitude estimate rather than a measured or fitted result. The primary spectroscopic demonstration is plausible, but the paper as written overreaches in presenting the vdW interpretation and the C3 estimate as established.

major comments (3)
  1. [§II, Fig. 4 and Eq. (4)] The red shifts are the sole quantitative basis for the van der Waals claim, but no frequency calibration, repeated scans, or error bars are reported. The text itself states that 'additional shifts may also arise from laser fluctuations and scanning nonlinearity.' The 8 MHz shift at L = 350 nm is only about 30% of the 27 MHz linewidth; if a fraction of this shift is an artifact of scan nonlinearity, then the use of Eq. (4) to anchor C3 is not justified. Please provide a quantitative uncertainty budget for the frequency axis and the measured shifts, or explicitly rephrase the vdW attribution as qualitative.
  2. [§II, C3 estimate] The value C3 ≈ 21.4 kHz·µm3 is introduced through 'rough estimates' with no derivation, no fit, and no uncertainty. The statement that it is 'in good agreement with the value presented in [4]' is not a substitute for an independent estimate or a measurement, since [4] is a review article. Moreover, C3 is not used in the line-shape model, so the comparison in Fig. 8 does not test this value. Please either derive the scaling, fit C3 to the measured shifts with uncertainties, or clearly label the C3 value as a rough expectation rather than a result.
  3. [§III, theoretical model and Fig. 8] The claim of 'good agreement with theoretical calculations' is weakened by the model's own stated limitations: Γ is a 'fittable broadening parameter,' the atomic density N is a free parameter affecting only amplitude, and the model 'does not accurately reflect the influence of the incident laser power on line broadening' or 'the influence of temperature broadening.' These caveats mean the agreement in Fig. 8 is not a parameter-free validation of the model or of the vdW shifts. The hyperfine assignments are independently supported by external constants and 6j transition strengths, but the theory-experiment comparison should be described as qualitative rather than as a quantitative confirmation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (1)] The definition of K is written as K = F(F+1) − I(I−1) − J(J+1); the standard hyperfine formula uses I(I+1), not I(I−1). Please check and correct.
  2. [Abstract and Conclusion] The word 'successfully' is misspelled as 'succesfully' in both the abstract and the conclusion.
  3. [§II, Fig. 6 discussion] The text says 'The linewidth (FWMH) for PL = 10 mW is around 27 MHz here as well.' The abbreviation should be FWHM.
  4. [§II, Fig. 6 discussion] The sentence 'The 3 → 2′, 3′, 4 are also well resolved' appears to omit a prime on the last transition; it should presumably read '3 → 2′, 3′, 4′.' Please clarify.
  5. [§II, Fig. 7] The caption of Fig. 7 refers to fitting with Gaussian profiles; the text would benefit from stating the fitted linewidth and the uncertainty of the fit, especially since this spectrum is used to support the claim of resolved transitions at L = 150 nm.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: hyperfine intervals and relative intensities come from external constants and Wigner 6j strengths, the line-shape model is applied with explicitly acknowledged free parameters, and the C3 estimate is imported from scaling/literature rather than fitted to the observed shifts.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks. Hyperfine transition positions are computed from Eq. (1) using constants from [21], and relative intensities from Eq. (2) with Wigner 6j symbols; these are independently checked against a derivative saturated-absorption spectrum from a 1 cm cell. The dSR spectra are modeled with the thin-vapor SR formalism of Zambon and Nienhuis [27], Dutier et al. [28], and Vartanyan and Lin [29], and the authors explicitly state that Γ is a 'fittable broadening parameter' and that 'the atomic density is a free parameter which only acts on the transition amplitude,' so the theoretical line shapes are not presented as parameter-free first-principles predictions. The van der Waals shift discussion uses C3 ≈ 21.4 kHz·µm3 said to come from rough scaling arguments and to be in agreement with the value in the external review [4], and Eq. (4) is taken from [26]; the two observed shifts (about 8 MHz at 350 nm and about 60 MHz at 180 nm) are compared with that external estimate rather than used to define it. The paper honestly notes that 'additional shifts may also arise from laser fluctuations and scanning nonlinearity' and that the model does not fully reflect power or temperature broadening. The lack of error bars and frequency calibration for the shifts is an evidentiary weakness in the atom-surface claim, not a circularity. Self-citations appear frequently but are not load-bearing for the central first demonstration of Doppler-free SR spectroscopy of this transition.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central spectroscopy claim uses external atomic constants and an established thin-cell model. The parameters not fixed by external data are the linewidth Gamma, the amplitude density N, and the C3 coefficient used to predict surface shifts. The C3 value is not independently derived or fitted in the paper, and the theoretical comparison relies on adjustable linewidth and amplitude.

free parameters (3)
  • Fittable broadening parameter Gamma = not stated
    Introduced in Eq. (11) and described as a fittable broadening parameter that includes optical width, collisional, and inhomogeneous broadening terms. It sets the theoretical linewidths used to match experimental dSR spectra.
  • Atomic density N = not stated
    Described in Section III as a free parameter that only acts on the transition amplitude, so the theory-experiment comparison includes an adjustable amplitude.
  • C3 interaction coefficient = 21.4 kHz·µm3
    Used with Eq. (4) to predict van der Waals red shifts at L = 350 nm and L = 180 nm. The value is presented as a rough estimate consistent with prior review [4], with no derivation, fit, or uncertainty given.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The thin-cell selective reflection model of Zambon-Nienhuis, Dutier et al., and Vartanyan-Lin (Eqs. 5-11) is valid in the linear optically-thin regime.
    Invoked in Section III to compute theoretical spectra; the paper assumes a dilute vapor, optically thin medium, and a Fabry-Perot description of internal reflections.
  • standard math Hyperfine constants A and B from [21] and the 6j-symbol transition strengths of Eq. (2) are correct for the Cs 7p 2P3/2 state.
    Used to assign the observed resonances and to compare relative intensities. These are external spectroscopic data, not derived in the paper.
  • domain assumption The observed red shifts are dominated by atom-surface van der Waals interaction described by Eq. (4), deltanu approximately -16 C3 / L^3.
    Used to convert the C3 estimate into predicted shifts; other possible shifts from laser scanning nonlinearity and atom-wall collision effects are mentioned but not quantified.
  • ad hoc to paper The C3 value for the 7p state can be estimated by scaling from known values, giving C3 = 21.4 kHz·µm3.
    No derivation is shown for this value; it is stated as a rough estimate and said to agree with [4], and it is used before comparing with the measured shifts.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Doppler-free Selective Reflection spectroscopy of the $6s$ $^2S_{1/2} \to 7p$ $^2P_{3/2}$ transition of Cesium using a nanofabricated vapor cell." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FAHEHKJW

@misc{pith2026250111548,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Doppler-free Selective Reflection spectroscopy of the $6s$ $^2S_1/2 \to 7p$ $^2P_3/2$ transition of Cesium using a nanofabricated vapor cell},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FAHEHKJW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.11548}
}
abstract

Selective Reflection (SR) spectroscopy of the $6s$ $^2S_{1/2} \rightarrow$ $7p$ $^2P_{3/2}$ electric dipole transition of Cesium ($\lambda~=~456$ nm) is performed for the first time using a nanometric-thin cell ($L=50 - 1500$~nm). We succesfully form narrow resonances corresponding to the $F_g = 3,4 \rightarrow F_e =2,3,4,5$ hyperfine transitions. All transitions are well spectrally resolved and the geometry of the cell allows us to obtain a strong 30 times narrowing of the Doppler width with a single beam pass. For lower thicknesses ($L < 400$~nm), we observe a red shift of the \ac{SR} lines which we attribute to atom-surface interactions, and provide estimates of the $C_3$ interaction coefficient. The SR signal reaches several percent of the incident radiation up to a saturation intensity of 100 mW/cm$^2$. SR is a convenient tool for laser spectroscopy of the hyperfine structure of atoms as well as for the study of Zeeman transitions in magnetic fields. Experimental measurements are in good agreement with theoretical calculations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.11548 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Picture of the experimental setup. The laser diode [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Hyperfine energy levels of the 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_5.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: is a dSR spectrum measured for L = 150 nm. Due to atom-surface interaction, the transition linewidth increases from 27 to 55 MHz. Despite this broadening, the transitions are still mostly spectrally resolved and their amplitudes are still in agreement with the expected…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [4]

    Bloch and M

    D. Bloch and M. Ducloy, Atom-wall interaction, in Advances In Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics , Vol. 50, edited by B. Bederson and H. Walther (2005) pp. 91–154

    work page 2005

  2. [1]

    A. Weis, V. A. Sautenkov, and T. W. H¨ ansch, Observation of ground-state zeeman coherences in the selective reflection from cesium vapor, Physical Review A 45, 7991 (1992)

    work page 1992

  3. [2]

    A slight red shift is also visible, of the same order of magnitude as for the other transitions. In fig. 6b we plot the dependence of the dSR linewidth versus the incident laser power PL. We observe an in- crease of the amplitude with the incident power following a close to linear dependency (the dashed line is drawn to guide the eye). Figure 7 is a dSR sp...

    work page

  4. [3]

    [9, 10, 24])

    This comes as a strong advantage for further atomic studies compared to what can be observed on a regular SA spectrum obtained in a long cell, such as curve 4○, where the transitions (Velocity-selective Optical Pumping (VSOP) resonances) are strongly overlapped with crossover (CO) resonances, that are completely absent in SR spectra (see eg. [9, 10, 24])....

    work page

  5. [5]

    Nienhuis, F

    G. Nienhuis, F. Schuller, and M. Ducloy, Nonlinear se- lective reflection from an atomic vapor at arbitrary inci- dence angle, Physical Review A 38, 5197 (1988)

    work page 1988

  6. [6]

    Failache, S

    H. Failache, S. Saltiel, M. Fichet, D. Bloch, and M. Ducloy, Resonant van der waals repul- sion between excited cs atoms and sapphire surface, Physical Review Letters 83, 5467 (1999)

    work page 1999

  7. [7]

    How- ever, for more precise results, α reads α = N t10Ei 4ℏε0F |deg|2, (12) where N is the vapor density and deg is the transition dipole moment

    and ( 8), α can simply be replaced by the transition strength of the tran- sition if one is looking for qualitative results only. How- ever, for more precise results, α reads α = N t10Ei 4ℏε0F |deg|2, (12) where N is the vapor density and deg is the transition dipole moment. To compute complete spectra, this pro- cedure can be looped over hyperfine transit...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Badalyan, V

    A. Badalyan, V. Chaltykyan, G. Grigoryan, A. Papoyan, S. Shmavonyan, and M. Movsessian, Selective reflection by atomic vapor: experiments and self-consistent theory, The European Physical Journal D - Atomic, Molecular, Optica l and Plasma Physics 37, 157 (2006)

    work page 2006

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    Sautenkov, S

    V. Sautenkov, S. Saakyan, A. Bobrov, L. Khalu- tornykh, and B. B. Zelener, Spectroscopy of reso- nantly saturated selective reflection from high-density rubidium vapor using the pump-probe technique, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transf er 328, 109153 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    Dutta, J

    B. Dutta, J. C. d. A. Carvalho, G. Garcia-Arellano, P. Pedri, A. Laliotis, C. Boldt, J. Kaushal, and S. Scheel, Effects of higher-order casimir- polder interactions on rydberg atom spectroscopy, Physical Review Research 6, L022035 (2024)

    2024

  3. [11]

    Keaveney, A

    J. Keaveney, A. Sargsyan, U. Krohn, I. G. Hughes, D. Sarkisyan, and C. S. Adams, Cooperative lamb shift in an atomic vapor layer of nanometer thickness, Physical Review Letters 108, 173601 (2012)

    2012

  4. [12]

    Sargsyan, E

    A. Sargsyan, E. Klinger, Y. Pashayan-Leroy, C. Leroy, A. Papoyan, and D. Sarkisyan, Selective reflection from rb vapor in half- and quarter-wave cells: Features and possible applications, JETP Lett. 104, 224 (2016)

    2016

  5. [13]

    Sargsyan, A

    A. Sargsyan, A. Papoyan, I. G. Hughes, C. S. Adams, and D. Sarkisyan, Selective reflection from an rb layer with a thickness below λ/ 12 and applications, Optics Letters 42, 1476 (2017)

    2017

  6. [14]

    Sargsyan, E

    A. Sargsyan, E. Klinger, G. Hakhumyan, A. Tonoyan, A. Papoyan, C. Leroy, and D. Sarkisyan, Decoupling of hyperfine structure of cs d1 line in strong magnetic field studied by selective reflection from a nanocell, JOSA B 34, 776 (2017)

    2017

  7. [15]

    Sargsyan, R

    A. Sargsyan, R. Momier, C. Leroy, and D. Sarkisyan, Competing van der waals and dipole-dipole interac- tions in optical nanocells at thicknesses below 100 nm, Physics Letters A 483, 129069 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    J. C. d. A. Carvalho, P. Pedri, M. Ducloy, and A. Laliotis, Retardation effects in spectroscopic measurements of the casimir-polder interaction, Physical Review A 97, 023806 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    Auzinsh, R

    M. Auzinsh, R. Ferber, F. Gahbauer, A. Jarmola, L. Kalvans, and A. Atvars, Cascade coherence transfer and magneto-optical resonances at 455 nm excitation of cesium, Optics Communications 284, 2863 (2011)

    2011

  10. [18]

    Damitz, G

    A. Damitz, G. Toh, E. Putney, C. E. Tanner, and D. S. Elliott, Measurement of the radial matrix ele- ments for the 6 s 2s1/ 2 → 7p 2pJ transitions in cesium, Physical Review A 99, 062510 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    F. Li, B. Zhao, J. Wei, P. Jin, H. Lu, and K. Peng, Continuously tunable single-frequency 455 nm blue laser for high-state excitation transition of cesium, Optics Letters 44, 3785 (2019) . 7

    2019

  12. [20]

    Klinger, A

    E. Klinger, A. Mursa, C. M. Rivera-Aguilar, R. Vicarini, N. Passilly, and R. Boudot, Sub-doppler spectroscopy of the cs atom 6 s1/ 2–7p1/ 2 transition at 459 nm in a micro- fabricated vapor cell, Optics Letters 49, 1953 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    Demtr¨ oder,Laser Spectroscopy: Basic Concepts and Instrumentation (2002)

    W. Demtr¨ oder,Laser Spectroscopy: Basic Concepts and Instrumentation (2002)

    2002

  14. [22]

    Sarkisyan, D

    D. Sarkisyan, D. Bloch, A. Papoyan, and M. Ducloy, Sub- doppler spectroscopy by sub-micron thin cs vapour layer, Opt. Comm. 200, 201 (2001)

    2001

  15. [23]

    Sargsyan, A

    A. Sargsyan, A. Tonoyan, G. Hakhumyan, C. Leroy, Y. Pashayan-Leroy, and D. Sarkisyan, Complete hyperfine paschen-back regime at relatively small magnetic fields realized in potassium nano-cell, EPL (Europhysics Letters) 110, 23001 (2015)

    2015

  16. [24]

    W. D. Williams, M. T. Herd, and W. B. Hawkins, Spec- troscopic study of the 7p1/2 and 7p3/2 states in cesium- 133, Laser Physics Letters 15, 095702 (2018)

    2018

  17. [25]

    Sargsyan, E

    A. Sargsyan, E. Klinger, C. Leroy, I. G. Hughes, D. Sark- isyan, and C. S. Adams, Selective reflection from a potassium atomic layer with a thickness as small as λ/ 13, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 52, 195001 (2019)

    2019

  18. [26]

    Demtr¨ oder,Atoms, Molecules and Photons: An Introduction to Atomic-, M olecular- and Quantum Physics , Graduate Texts in Physics (Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010)

    W. Demtr¨ oder,Atoms, Molecules and Photons: An Introduction to Atomic-, M olecular- and Quantum Physics , Graduate Texts in Physics (Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010)

    2010

  19. [27]

    Papageorgiou, A

    N. Papageorgiou, A. Weis, V. A. Sautenkov, D. Bloch, and M. Ducloy, High-resolution selective reflec- tion spectroscopy in intermediate magnetic fields, Applied Physics B 59, 123 (1994)

    1994

  20. [28]

    Whittaker, J

    K. Whittaker, J. Keaveney, I. Hughes, A. Sargsyan, D. Sarkisyan, and C. Adams, Optical response of gas- phase atoms at less than λ/ 80 from a dielectric surface, Physical Review Letters 112, 253201 (2014)

    2014

  21. [29]

    Keaveney, Collective atom light interactions in dense atomic vapours (2014)

    J. Keaveney, Collective atom light interactions in dense atomic vapours (2014)

    2014

  22. [30]

    Zambon and G

    B. Zambon and G. Nienhuis, Reflection and transmission of light by thin vapor layers, Opt. Comm. 143, 308 (1997)

    1997

  23. [31]

    Dutier, S

    G. Dutier, S. Saltiel, D. Bloch, and M. Ducloy, Revisit- ing optical spectroscopy in a thin vapor cell: mixing of reflection and transmission as a fabry–perot microcavity effect, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 20, 793–800 (2003)

    2003

  24. [32]

    Vartanyan and D

    T. Vartanyan and D. Lin, Enhanced selective reflec- tion from a thin layer of a dilute gaseous medium, Phys. Rev. A 51, 1959–1964 (1995)

    1995

  25. [33]

    “Usual” referring to the fields that would be obtained by considering only one traveling-wave excitation and by neglecting internal reflections

  26. [34]

    A. V. Ermolaev and T. A. Vartanyan, Rigorous theory of thin-vapor-layer linear optical properties: The case of specular reflection of atoms colliding with the walls, Physical Review A 101, 053850 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    A. V. Ermolaev and T. A. Vartanyan, Theory of thin- vapor-layer linear-optical properties: The case of quench - ing of atomic polarization upon collisions of atoms with dielectric walls, Physical Review A 105, 013518 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    de Freitas, M

    H. de Freitas, M. Oria, and M. Chevrollier, Spectroscopy of cesium atoms adsorbing and desorbing at a dielectric surface, Applied Physics B 75, 703 (2002)

    2002

  29. [37]

    Sargsyan, A

    A. Sargsyan, A. Gogyan, and D. Sarkisyan, Elec- tromagnetically induced transparency using selec- tive reflection radiation from a thin rb vapor cell, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transf er 329, 109197

  30. [38]

    Sargsyan, D

    A. Sargsyan, D. Sarkisyan, and A. Papoyan, Dark-line atomic resonances in a submicron-thin Rb vapor layer, Physical Review A 73, 033803 (2006)

    2006

  31. [39]

    Sargsyan, A

    A. Sargsyan, A. Amiryan, A. Tonoyan, E. Klinger, and D. Sarkisyan, Circular dichroism in atomic va- pors: Magnetically induced transitions responsible for two distinct behaviors, Phys. Lett. A 390, 10.1016/j.physleta.2020.127114 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    Peyrot, C

    T. Peyrot, C. Beurthe, S. Coumar, M. Roulliay, K. Perronet, P. Bonnay, C. S. Adams, A. Browaeys, and Y. R. P. Sortais, Fabrication and characteriza- tion of super-polished wedged borosilicate nano-cells, Optics Letters 44, 1940 (2019)

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.