Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 51 references

Array oscillator in coupled waveguides with nonlinear gain and radiation resistances saturating at exceptional point

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that a nonlinear antenna array saturates at the exceptional point of degeneracy of its periodic waveguide, which sets the oscillation frequency and keeps radiated power growing with array length.

desk verdict New EPD-saturating array topology with nonzero gain at saturation is experimentally plausible, but the GHz design's dispersion calculation uses a different Yr than the simulation, so the central frequency match is unproven. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.14978 v2 pith:FAWAPVHS submitted 2025-01-24 physics.app-ph

Alireza Nikzamir , Albert Herrero-Parareda , Nathaniel Furman , Benjamin Bradshaw , Miguel Saavedra-Melo , Filippo Capolino This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.app-ph
keywords exceptionalpointofdegeneracyarrayoscillatornonlineargainsaturationcoupledtransmissionlinesFloquet-Blochdispersionradiatingantennaphasenoiseglidesymmetry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes that a periodically loaded waveguide with discrete nonlinear gain elements and radiating lossy loads can be made to oscillate at a frequency set by an exceptional point of degeneracy (EPD) of the corresponding infinite periodic structure. After saturation, the gain in every element settles to the same value, the one that makes two Bloch modes coalesce at k=0, and the oscillation frequency becomes the EPD frequency. Because the saturated gain stays nonzero when the array is lengthened, the total radiated power grows with the number of elements, unlike an earlier design in which the saturated gain vanished with array length. The claim matters because it points toward high-power radiating arrays that combine a length-independent oscillation frequency, uniform aperture illumination, and robustness to element failure. Experimental data from a six-element board confirm the predicted saturation gain, the EPD frequency, uniform power, and a narrow measured linewidth.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the second-order exceptional point of degeneracy (EPD) in the Floquet-Bloch dispersion of the periodic waveguide: the point in frequency where two modal wavenumbers become equal and their eigenvectors coalesce, making the unit-cell transfer matrix similar to a Jordan block. The unit cell consists of two coupled transmission-line segments of length d with alternating shunt gain and shunt radiation admittances, giving a glide-symmetric 4x4 transfer matrix whose reciprocal characteristic equation factors into $(\zeta^2 - a_1\zeta + 1)(\zeta^2 - a_2\zeta + 1)$. The EPD at k=0 corresponds to $a_1=2$, and its distance is tracked by the coalescence parameter $C$, the minimum sine of the angle between eigenvector pairs. The nonlinear gain is modeled with a cubic current-voltage curve, and the saturated complex admittance of each element is extracted from the Fourier transform of voltage and current at the oscillation frequency; this saturated gain is then inserted into the linear dispersion analysis, which identifies the EPD frequency that the finite array actually oscillates at.

What would settle it

Build the same array with an increasing number of elements, say N = 6, 12, 24, and 48, and measure the saturated gain and oscillation frequency in each case. The paper's claim predicts the saturated gain stays at a nonzero constant (about 0.51 mS in the 3.91 GHz design and 18–19 mS in the 21 MHz design) while the frequency shifts by less than about one percent; observing the saturated gain decreasing toward zero with N, or the frequency moving with length by many percent, would falsify the EPD-as-attractor claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is an attractor: once a coupled-transmission-line array with cubic nonlinear gain and radiation loads reaches steady state, the saturated gain across all active elements becomes uniform and equal to the value that produces a second-order EPD in the dispersion of the infinite periodic waveguide. At that EPD, which appears at k=0 (a1=2 in the characteristic equation), two Floquet-Bloch modes have equal wavenumbers and coalescing eigenvectors, and the EPD frequency coincides with the measured and simulated oscillation frequency (3.91 GHz in the first design, 21.2 MHz in the experiment). The paper shows the EPD frequency is nearly independent of array length (0.01% shift when tripling N in simulation) and that the saturated gain tends to a purely real nonzero constant, so radiated power per element stays roughly uniform and total power increases with length. It further demonstrates in simulation that the same saturated state is reached for different small-signal gains and under random gain and loss perturbations and a faulty element, and experimentally that the measured saturated gain places the dispersion at an EPD.

Load-bearing premise

The argument relies on treating the short, open-ended finite array as if it were governed by the infinite periodic waveguide's dispersion, using the saturated gain measured at one middle element to locate the EPD; the paper does not quantify how open-circuit terminations and finite length shift or broaden that correspondence.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The oscillation frequency is set by the EPD of the periodic structure, so lengthening the array does not require retuning; simulated frequency shift is 0.01% when the element count is tripled.
  • Total radiated power grows with array length because the saturated gain per element stays nonzero, enabling scalable high-power radiating arrays.
  • Saturated gain and radiated power are uniform across the array, giving an evenly illuminated aperture without external amplitude tapering.
  • The saturated state is reached from different small-signal gains and survives random gain and loss variations and a near-dead element, so fabrication tolerances and partial failure do not destroy oscillation.
  • The EPD operation yields a clean spectrum: measured phase noise of -89 dB/Hz at 10 kHz offset and a 0.8 kHz linewidth at -3 dB.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the EPD is a true attractor of the saturation dynamics, the same self-locking mechanism could be extended to two-dimensional phased arrays, allowing each active element to settle to the common EPD gain without an external locking loop.
  • Engineering the unit cell so the EPD sits at k=π/D instead of k=0 might give a frequency-stable oscillator with a scan angle, since the degenerate mode would radiate at an angle set by the Brillouin-zone edge.
  • The finite-to-infinite correspondence could be tested directly by comparing the open-ended array's eigenmode closest to the EPD with the infinite-structure Jordan-block eigenvector; if terminations are optimized, even shorter arrays may reach near-exact coalescence and lower phase noise.
  • A quantitative prediction is that phase noise should improve or at least stay flat as N grows, because the EPD frequency does not shift with length; measuring phase noise versus N would separate EPD locking from simple power scaling.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies a periodically loaded waveguide made of two coupled microstrip lines with discrete nonlinear gain elements and lossy radiating loads. It claims that, after the nonlinear gain saturates, the finite array self-oscillates at the frequency of a second-order exceptional point of degeneracy (EPD) of the corresponding infinite periodic waveguide, with uniform saturated gain, roughly uniform radiated power, and an oscillation frequency that is nearly independent of array length. The authors support this with ADS time-domain simulations for a 3.91 GHz design, transfer-matrix Floquet–Bloch dispersion calculations, robustness simulations with gain/loss perturbations and a faulty element, and a low-frequency experimental implementation on a six-element board. The main claimed advance over prior work is that the saturated gain remains nonzero as the array grows, so radiated power can continue to increase with array length.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper offers a practically useful route to scalable high-power synchronized radiating arrays: saturation at an EPD would stabilize the oscillation frequency and keep per-element radiated power uniform without vanishing saturated gain. The paper has several genuine strengths: an experimental demonstration on a fabricated board, measured phase noise and uniform power distribution, explicit transfer-matrix dispersion theory with EPD conditions, and systematic robustness simulations against gain and loss variations, including a failed element. However, the load-bearing connection between the finite nonlinear array and the infinite periodic waveguide's EPD currently rests on a parameter inconsistency in the simulated GHz design and on self-consistency checks in which the saturated gain used in the dispersion relation is extracted from the same simulation or measurement that produced the oscillation frequency. These issues must be resolved before the title-level claim is fully supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Secs. III–IV, Fig. 4] The dispersion calculation in Sec. IV is introduced as using "the same parameter values in the saturation regime as in Sec. III," but the Sec. III ADS simulation uses Yr = 40 mS (stated in Sec. III, and Fig. 3 perturbs around Yr = 40 mS), whereas Fig. 4 and the text use Yr = 21.3 mS. Because the EPD frequency depends on Yr, the reported coincidence fEPD = 3.915 GHz versus fosc = 3.91 GHz is not actually validated for the simulated design. The authors must either recompute the Sec. IV dispersion with Yr = 40 mS or rerun the Sec. III simulation with Yr = 21.3 mS; without this, the primary numerical evidence for the GHz design is missing.
  2. [Secs. IV–V, Eqs. (2) and (8)] The EPD frequency is obtained by inserting the saturated gain extracted from the same time-domain simulation (gsat = 0.51 mS in Sec. IV) or the same experimental board (gsat = 19 mS in Sec. V) into the dispersion relation of Eq. (8). The resulting agreement fEPD ≈ fosc is therefore a model-consistency check, not an independent prediction that the EPD establishes the oscillation frequency. To support the causal claim, the paper should provide at least one of the following: an EPD frequency predicted from independently known parameters before extracting the saturated gain; a parameter study showing that fEPD tracks fosc as gain or load values are varied; or an explicit statement that the comparison is a self-consistency check rather than a prediction.
  3. [Secs. III–V, Fig. 6] The central modeling premise is that a short, open-ended finite array (N = 6 to 20 elements) can be characterized by the k = 0 Floquet–Bloch mode of an infinite periodic waveguide. The paper never quantifies how the open-circuit terminations or finite length modify the k = 0 mode. This matters most for the experimental board, which has only N = 6 elements (three unit cells), yet the EPD calculation in Fig. 6(e,f) assumes infinite periodicity. A finite-length eigenmode analysis, or a quantitative study of the finite-array mode's approach to the infinite-array EPD as N increases, is needed to justify the finite-to-infinite correspondence.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. III, Fig. 2] The text states that the simulation uses "8 unit cells (equivalent to N = 16 nonlinear elements)", but the caption of Fig. 2(a) says "a system with 16 unit cells." This discrepancy should be corrected.
  2. [Sec. IV, Fig. 4] The text reports fEPD = fosc = 3.915 GHz, while the Sec. III simulation and Fig. 2(b) show fosc = 3.91 GHz. The rounding difference should be made explicit so the claimed equality is not overstated.
  3. [Figs. 2 and 6] The vertical-axis labels in Fig. 2(g) and Fig. 6(g) read "Pr (mV)" but the quantities are powers in mW; please correct the units.
  4. [Sec. V, Fig. 6(d)] The phase noise value "−89 dB/Hz at a 10 kHz offset" should be written as dBc/Hz (or dB relative to the carrier per hertz) to match standard oscillator terminology.
  5. [Throughout] The paper calls the power dissipated in the shunt admittances Yr "radiated power" throughout. Since Yr is a circuit-level model of a radiator, this is acceptable, but the abstract and conclusion should clarify once that this is the power delivered to the modeled radiation admittance, not directly measured radiated power.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The claimed EPD-frequency match reduces to a self-consistency check: the saturated gain extracted from the oscillating finite array or board is inserted into the infinite-array dispersion, so f_EPD=f_osc is not an independent prediction; the GHz case also switches Yr from 40 mS to 21.3 mS.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. IV, Fig. 4(a), dispersion discussion; saturated gain from Sec. III, Eq. (2)]
    "Figure 4(a) displays the dispersion diagram of the periodic waveguide with the same parameter values in the saturation regime as in Sec. III, namely,gsat = 0.51mS, Yr = 21.3mS, d = 198mm, ϵr,e = 3.75, ϵr,o = 3.02, Ze = 29.8 Ω and Zo = 19.8 Ω. As expected from the results in Ref.[25], thesaturatedperiodicsystemdisplaysasecond-order EPD, and the frequency at which it occurs corresponds to the frequency at which the finite-length array discussed in the previous section operates after reaching saturation, namely fEPD = fosc = 3 .915 GHz."

    The gain used in the dispersion, gsat = 0.51 mS, is not an independently chosen parameter: it is extracted in Sec. III from the same finite-array time-domain simulation, at the oscillation frequency fosc = 3.91 GHz, via the FFT ratio in Eq. (2). Evaluating the infinite-array dispersion with that fitted gain and then reporting that fEPD equals fosc is therefore a self-consistency check, not a prediction that the EPD sets the oscillation frequency. The check is further not performed at the simulated design point, because the Sec. III simulations used Yr = 40 mS while Fig. 4(a) uses Yr = 21.3 mS. Without a dispersion calculation at Yr = 40 mS, the claimed coincidence for the GHz design is unsupported.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Sec. V.B, Fig. 6(e)-(f), experimental validation]
    "To confirm the saturated system supports an EPD at the oscillation frequency, we calculate the Bloch mode dispersion diagram using the gain ofgsat = 19 mS measured in the saturation regime."

    The gain inserted into the dispersion is measured from the same physical board after it already oscillates at fosc = 21.2 MHz. Computing the EPD with that measured saturated gain and finding it near 21.1 MHz confirms that the measured operating point is close to a degeneracy of the linearized model, but it does not demonstrate that the EPD predetermined or established the oscillation frequency. The agreement is a consistency relation between quantities derived from the same oscillation, and the same fitted-input logic is used here as in Sec. IV.

full rationale

The paper contains substantial independent results: uniform saturated gain and radiated power profiles, robustness to gain/loss perturbations and element failure, and weak dependence of frequency on array length. Those are not circular. However, the central claim that the array saturates at the EPD of the infinite periodic waveguide and that this EPD sets the oscillation frequency is supported only by a post-hoc consistency argument. The saturated gain used in the dispersion is extracted from the same simulation or measurement at the oscillation frequency, and the EPD frequency is then computed from that gain; equality f_EPD = f_osc is thus a check that the fitted gain lies near the EPD gain, not an independent derivation of f_osc. For the simulated GHz design the comparison is also inconsistent because the time-domain simulation uses Yr = 40 mS while the dispersion calculation uses Yr = 21.3 mS, so the claimed match is not evaluated at the simulated design point. The experimental MHz design is internally parameter-consistent but has the same fitted-input structure. Because the key causal claim reduces to this self-consistency check, the paper is partially circular on its central point; the independent secondary results keep it from being fully circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard transfer-matrix and Floquet-Bloch analysis plus three domain assumptions: radiation modeled as shunt resistors, the finite array approximated by an infinite periodic structure, and single-frequency phasor extraction. The EPD match uses saturated gain values taken from the same simulation or measurement, so the consistency check is not fully independent.

free parameters (3)
  • Cubic saturation coefficient alpha_n = g_n/3 = alpha = g/3 (S/V^2), with 1 V turning point
    The nonlinear i-v curve in Eq. (1) sets the saturation level at 1 V; the saturated gain value (0.51 mS in simulation, 19 mS in experiment) depends on this ad hoc choice, and the paper does not validate it against the measured op-amp saturation characteristic.
  • Radiation load Yr = 40 mS in Sec. III; 21.3 mS in Sec. IV and Sec. V
    The time-domain simulation for the GHz design uses Yr=40 mS, while the EPD dispersion calculation uses Yr=21.3 mS and labels it as the same parameter. This inconsistency makes the EPD match partly dependent on which load value is chosen.
  • Coupling capacitance C = 16 nF
    In the experimental design, C is chosen by hand to lower the oscillation frequency to 21.67 MHz, so it is a design parameter that sets the operating frequency rather than a derived quantity.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Floquet-Bloch theorem applies to the infinite periodic waveguide, and the finite open-ended array's steady-state oscillation is governed by these infinite-structure modes.
    Sec. IV uses the dispersion relation of the infinite array to interpret the finite array's oscillation, but the array length is only 6 to 20 elements and edge effects are not quantified.
  • domain assumption Radiation from antennas is represented by a shunt admittance Yr; mutual coupling and radiation patterns are ignored.
    Throughout, radiating elements are modeled as resistive loads, so claims about high-power radiating arrays rely on this equivalence.
  • domain assumption The steady state is well approximated by a single-frequency phasor at fosc; harmonics are neglected in Eq. (2).
    The saturated gain Ygsat is extracted via FFT at fosc, implicitly assuming that the fundamental harmonic determines the modal admittance.
  • standard math Standard transfer-matrix and coupled-mode theory for coupled transmission lines.
    Eqs. (3)-(7) rely on textbook transmission line theory, which is unproblematic.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Array oscillator in coupled waveguides with nonlinear gain and radiation resistances saturating at exceptional point." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FAWAPVHS

@misc{pith2026250114978,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Array oscillator in coupled waveguides with nonlinear gain and radiation resistances saturating at exceptional point},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FAWAPVHS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.14978}
}
read the original abstract

A periodically loaded waveguide composed of periodic discrete nonlinear gain and radiating elements supports a stable oscillation regime related to the presence of an exceptional point of degeneracy (EPD). After reaching saturation, the EPD in the system establishes the oscillation frequency. We demonstrate a synchronization regime at a stable oscillation frequency, resulting in uniform saturated gain across the array and uniform radiating power. Unlike conventional one-dimensional cavity resonances, the oscillation frequency is independent of the array length. Our investigations further show that when small-signal gain is non-uniformly distributed across the array, the saturated gain results in having a uniform distribution at a gain value that generates an EPD. Experimental validation using the measured board confirmed that the system saturates at an EPD, with a measured spectrum exhibiting very low phase noise. This low noise allows for operation at a clean oscillation frequency. Additionally, the measured uniform power across the array corresponds to the simulation results. The proposed scheme can pave the way for a new generation of high-power radiating arrays with distributed active elements.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.14978 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Periodic array with elements radiating syn [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Time domain signal in the saturation regime for a system with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Radiated power along the structure when the small-signal gain is nonuniform with random values [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Real and imaginary parts of the complex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Proposed circuit with a coupling capacitive [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Assembled array with a length of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) Measured saturation gain distribution across the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: For the cases with maximum perturbation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Simulated saturated gain of each nonlinear gain element for two small-signal gain values [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (a) Total “radiated” power increases with array [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. (a) Schematic of the circuit using an op amp to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [25]

    Exceptional-point degeneracy as a desirable operation point for an oscillator array with discrete nonlinear gain and radiative elements,

    A. Nikzamir and F. Capolino, “Exceptional-point degeneracy as a desirable operation point for an oscillator array with discrete nonlinear gain and radiative elements,” Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 21, p. 024037, Feb 2024. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.21.024037

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.21.024037 2024

  2. [1]

    The solution of some perturbation problems for matrices and selfadjoint or non-selfadjoint differential equations i,

    M. I. Vishik and L. A. Lyusternik, “The solution of some perturbation problems for matrices and selfadjoint or non-selfadjoint differential equations i,” Russian Math- ematical Surveys, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1–73, Jun 1960, doi: 10.1070/rm1960v015n03abeh004092

    work page doi:10.1070/rm1960v015n03abeh004092 1960

  3. [2]

    On eigenvalues of matrices dependent on a parameter,

    P. Lancaster, “On eigenvalues of matrices dependent on a parameter,” Numerische Mathematik, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 377–387, Dec 1964, doi: 10.1007/bf01386087

    doi:10.1007/bf01386087 1964

  4. [3]

    Kato, Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators

    T. Kato, Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators . Springer-Verlag New York Inc., New York, 1966, doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-12678-3

    doi:10.1007/978-3-662-12678-3 1966

  5. [4]

    Avoided level crossing and exceptional points,

    W. D. Heiss and A. L. Sannino, “Avoided level crossing and exceptional points,” Journal of Physics A: Mathe- matical and General, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 1167–1178, Apr. 1990

    work page 1990

  6. [5]

    Sensitivity analysis of multiple eigen- values,

    A. P. Seyranian, “Sensitivity analysis of multiple eigen- values,” Journal of Structural Mechanics , vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 261–284, Jan 1993, doi: 10.1080/08905459308905189

    work page doi:10.1080/08905459308905189 1993

  7. [6]

    Physics of nonhermitian degen- eracies,

    M. Berry, “Physics of nonhermitian degen- eracies,” Czechoslovak Journal of Physics , vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 1039–1047, Oct 2004, doi: 10.1023/b:cjop.0000044002.05657.04

    arXiv 2004

  8. [7]

    Gigantic transmission band- edge resonance in periodic stacks of anisotropic layers,

    A. Figotin and I. Vitebskiy, “Gigantic transmission band- edge resonance in periodic stacks of anisotropic layers,” Phys. Rev. E , vol. 72, p. 036619, Sep 2005

    work page 2005

Show all 51 references
  1. [8]

    Exceptional points of de- generacy in periodic coupled waveguides and the inter- play of gain and radiation loss: Theoretical and exper- imental demonstration,

    A. F. Abdelshafy, M. A. K. Othman, D. Oshmarin, A. T. Almutawa, and F. Capolino, “Exceptional points of de- generacy in periodic coupled waveguides and the inter- play of gain and radiation loss: Theoretical and exper- imental demonstration,” IEEE Transactions on Anten- nas an...

    2019

  2. [9]

    Triple ladder lumped circuit with sixth or- der modal exceptional degeneracy,

    F. Yazdi, A. Nikzamir, T. Mealy, M. Y. Nada, and F. Capolino, “Triple ladder lumped circuit with sixth or- der modal exceptional degeneracy,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers , vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 1910–1918, May 2022

    1910

  3. [10]

    Experimental demonstration of exceptional points of degeneracy in linear time periodic systems and exceptional sensitivity,

    H. Kazemi, M. Y. Nada, A. Nikzamir, F. Maddaleno, and F. Capolino, “Experimental demonstration of exceptional points of degeneracy in linear time periodic systems and exceptional sensitivity,” Journal of Applied Physics , vol. 131, no. 14, p. 144502, 2022

    2022

  4. [11]

    Ex- ceptional points of degeneracy directly induced by space– time modulation of a single transmission line,

    K. Rouhi, H. Kazemi, A. Figotin, and F. Capolino, “Ex- ceptional points of degeneracy directly induced by space– time modulation of a single transmission line,”IEEE An- tennas and Wireless Propagation Letters , vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1906–1910, 2020

    1906

  5. [12]

    General conditions to realize exceptional points of degeneracy in two uniform coupled transmission lines,

    T. Mealy and F. Capolino, “General conditions to realize exceptional points of degeneracy in two uniform coupled transmission lines,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques , vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 3342–3354, Aug 2020, doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2020.2999498

    2020

  6. [13]

    Theory of Excep- tional Points of Degeneracy in Uniform Coupled Waveg- uides and Balance of Gain and Loss,

    M. A. K. Othman and F. Capolino, “Theory of Excep- tional Points of Degeneracy in Uniform Coupled Waveg- uides and Balance of Gain and Loss,”IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation , vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 5289– 5302, Oct 2017, doi: 10.1109/TAP.2017.2738063

    2017

  7. [14]

    Real spectra in non- Hermitian Hamiltonians having PT symmetry,

    C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, “Real spectra in non- Hermitian Hamiltonians having PT symmetry,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 80, pp. 5243–5246, Jun 1998

    1998

  8. [15]

    Theory of coupled optical PT- symmetric structures,

    R. El-Ganainy, K. G. Makris, D. N. Christodoulides, and Z. H. Musslimani, “Theory of coupled optical PT- symmetric structures,” Optics Letters, vol. 32, no. 17, p. 2632, Aug 2007

    2007

  9. [16]

    Observation ofPT -symmetry breaking in complex optical potentials,

    A. Guo, G. J. Salamo, D. Duchesne, R. Morandotti, M. Volatier-Ravat, V. Aimez, G. A. Siviloglou, and D. N. Christodoulides, “Observation ofPT -symmetry breaking in complex optical potentials,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 103, 14 p. 093902, Aug 2009

    2009

  10. [17]

    Observation of parity–time symmetry in optics,

    C. E. Rüter, K. G. Makris, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, M. Segev, and D. Kip, “Observation of parity–time symmetry in optics,”Nature Physics, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 192–195, Jan 2010

    2010

  11. [18]

    PT - symmetry breaking in a necklace of coupled optical waveguides,

    I. V. Barashenkov, L. Baker, and N. V. Alexeeva, “PT - symmetry breaking in a necklace of coupled optical waveguides,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 87, p. 033819, Mar 2013

    2013

  12. [19]

    Parity-time symmetric microring lasers,

    H. Hodaei, M.-A. Miri, M. Heinrich, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, “Parity-time symmetric microring lasers,” Science, vol. 346, no. 6212, pp. 975–978, Nov 2014, doi: 10.1126/science.1258480

    2014 doi

  13. [20]

    PT -symmetric waveguide system with ev- idence of a third-order exceptional point,

    J. Schnabel, H. Cartarius, J. Main, G. Wunner, and W. D. Heiss, “PT -symmetric waveguide system with ev- idence of a third-order exceptional point,”Phys. Rev. A , vol. 95, p. 053868, May 2017

    2017

  14. [21]

    The physics of exceptional points,

    W. D. Heiss, “The physics of exceptional points,”Jour- nal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical , vol. 45, no. 44, p. 444016, Oct 2012

    2012

  15. [22]

    High-sensitive parity-time symmetric oscil- lator in coupled transmission lines with nonlinear gain,

    H. Kazemi, A. Nikzamir, T. Mealy, A. Abdelshafy, and F. Capolino, “High-sensitive parity-time symmetric oscil- lator in coupled transmission lines with nonlinear gain,” IEEE Journal of Microwaves , vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 389–400, Jul 2022

    2022

  16. [23]

    Frequency- domain analysis of an oscillator with an exceptional point of degeneracy,

    C. Moncada, F. Ramírez, and A. Suárez, “Frequency- domain analysis of an oscillator with an exceptional point of degeneracy,”IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 2024

    2024

  17. [24]

    Exceptional degeneracy in a waveguide pe- riodically loaded with discrete gain and radiation loss elements,

    A. F. Abdelshafy, T. Mealy, E. Hafezi, A. Nikzamir, and F. Capolino, “Exceptional degeneracy in a waveguide pe- riodically loaded with discrete gain and radiation loss elements,” Applied Physics Letters , vol. 118, no. 22, p. 224102, May 2021, doi: 10.1063/5.0051238

    2021 doi

  18. [26]

    Nonlinear waves in PT -symmetric systems,

    V. V. Konotop, J. Yang, and D. A. Zezyulin, “Nonlinear waves in PT -symmetric systems,” Rev. Mod. Phys. , vol. 88, p. 035002, Jul 2016. [Online]. Available: https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.88.035002

    2016 doi

  19. [27]

    Highly sensitive coupled oscillator based on an exceptional point of degeneracy and nonlinearity,

    A. Nikzamir and F. Capolino, “Highly sensitive coupled oscillator based on an exceptional point of degeneracy and nonlinearity,” Phys. Rev. Appl. , vol. 18, p. 054059, Nov 2022

    2022

  20. [28]

    Coupling- independent real-time wireless resistive sensing through nonlinear PT symmetry,

    S. Kananian, G. Alexopoulos, and A. S. Poon, “Coupling- independent real-time wireless resistive sensing through nonlinear PT symmetry,” Phys. Rev. Appl. , vol. 14, p. 064072, Dec 2020. [Online]. Available: https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.064072

    2020 doi

  21. [29]

    Distributed degenerate band edge oscillator,

    A.F.Abdelshafy, D.Oshmarin, M.A.K.Othman, M.M. Green, and F. Capolino, “Distributed degenerate band edge oscillator,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 1821–1824, Mar 2021

    2021

  22. [30]

    Experimental demonstration of a new oscillator concept based on degenerate band edge in microstrip circuit,

    D. Oshmarin, A. F. Abdelshafy, A. Nikzamir, M. M. Green, and F. Capolino, “Experimental demonstration of a new oscillator concept based on degenerate band edge in microstrip circuit,” arXiv:2109.07002. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.07002, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Noise resilient exceptional-point voltmeters enabled by oscillation quenching phenomena,

    A. Suntharalingam, L. Fernández-Alcázar, R. Kononchuk, and T. Kottos, “Noise resilient exceptional-point voltmeters enabled by oscillation quenching phenomena,” Nature Communications , vol. 14, no. 1, p. 5515, 2023

    2023

  24. [32]

    Propaga- tion in periodically loaded waveguides with higher sym- metries,

    A. Hessel, M. H. Chen, R. Li, and A. Oliner, “Propaga- tion in periodically loaded waveguides with higher sym- metries,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 183–195, 1973

    1973

  25. [33]

    Third order modal exceptional degeneracy in waveguides with glide-time symmetry,

    F. Yazdi, T. Mealy, A. Nikzamir, R. Marosi, and F. Capolino, “Third order modal exceptional degeneracy in waveguides with glide-time symmetry,”Phys. Rev. A , vol. 105, p. 052230, May 2022

    2022

  26. [34]

    S. A. Maas, Nonlinear microwave and RF circuits . Artech house, 2003

    2003

  27. [35]

    Accurate models for mi- crostrip computer-aided design,

    E. Hammerstad and O. Jensen, “Accurate models for mi- crostrip computer-aided design,” in 1980 IEEE MTT- S International Microwave symposium Digest , 1980, pp. 407–409

    1980

  28. [36]

    Oscillator frequency stability,

    M. E. Frerking, “Oscillator frequency stability,” inCrys- tal Oscillator Design and Temperature Compensation . Springer Netherlands, 1978, pp. 14–19

    1978

  29. [37]

    Measurements of frequency sta- bility,

    F. Walls and D. Allan, “Measurements of frequency sta- bility,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 162– 168, 1986

    1986

  30. [38]

    K-band hair-pin resonator oscillators,

    A.-S. Hyun, H.-S. Kim, J.-Y. Park, J.-H. Kim, J.-C. Lee, N.-Y. Kim, B.-K. Kim, and U.-S. Hong, “K-band hair-pin resonator oscillators,” 999 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest (Cat. No.99CH36282) , vol. vol.2, pp. pp. 725–728, 1999

    1999

  31. [39]

    A low phase-noise 38-GHz HBT MMIC oscillator utilizing a novel transmission line res- onator,

    K. Hosoya, S. Tanaka, Y. Amamiya, T. Niwa, H. Shi- mawaki, and K. Honjo, “A low phase-noise 38-GHz HBT MMIC oscillator utilizing a novel transmission line res- onator,” 2000 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest (Cat. No.00CH37017) , vol. vol. 1, pp. pp. 47–50, 2000

    2000

  32. [40]

    Large-scale array of resonant-tunneling-diode terahertz oscillators for high output power at 1 THz,

    K. Kasagi, S. Suzuki, and M. Asada, “Large-scale array of resonant-tunneling-diode terahertz oscillators for high output power at 1 THz,”Journal of Applied Physics , vol. 125, no. 15, p. 151601, Apr 2019

    2019

  33. [41]

    Excep- tional point of degeneracy in a backward-wave oscilla- tor with distributed power extraction,

    T. Mealy, A. F. Abdelshafy, and F. Capolino, “Excep- tional point of degeneracy in a backward-wave oscilla- tor with distributed power extraction,”Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 14, p. 014078, Jul 2020

    2020

  34. [42]

    High-power X-band relativistic backward-wave os- cillator with exceptional synchronous regime operating at an exceptional point,

    ——, “High-power X-band relativistic backward-wave os- cillator with exceptional synchronous regime operating at an exceptional point,” Phys. Rev. Appl. , vol. 15, p. 064021, Jun 2021

    2021

  35. [43]

    D. M. Pozar, Microwave Engineering , 4th ed. WILEY, 2011. [Online]. Avail- able: https://www.ebook.de/de/product/14948033/ david_m_pozar_microwave_engineering.html

    2011

  36. [44]

    Design of a Modified Coupled Resonators Optical Waveguide Sup- porting a Frozen Mode,

    M. Y. Nada, T. Mealy, M. S. Islam, I. Vitebskiy, R. Gib- son, R. Bedford, O. Boyraz, and F. Capolino, “Design of a Modified Coupled Resonators Optical Waveguide Sup- porting a Frozen Mode,”Journal of Lightwave Technol- ogy, vol. 41, no. 17, pp. 1–15, 2023

    2023

  37. [45]

    Floquet-bloch the- ory and topology in periodically driven lattices,

    A. Gómez-León and G. Platero, “Floquet-bloch the- ory and topology in periodically driven lattices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 110, p. 200403, May 2013. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.110.200403

    2013

  38. [46]

    Angles in complex vector spaces,

    K. Scharnhorst, “Angles in complex vector spaces,”Acta Applicandae Mathematicae, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 95–103, 2001, doi: 10.1023/a:1012692601098

    2001 doi

  39. [47]

    Frozen mode in three-way periodic microstrip coupled waveguide,

    M. Y. Nada, T. Mealy, and F. Capolino, “Frozen mode in three-way periodic microstrip coupled waveguide,”IEEE 15 Microwave and Wireless Components Letters , vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 229–232, 2021

    2021

  40. [48]

    Hogben,Handbook of linear algebra

    L. Hogben,Handbook of linear algebra. CRC press, 2006

    2006

  41. [49]

    A general theory of phase noise in electrical oscillators,

    A. Hajimiri and T. Lee, “A general theory of phase noise in electrical oscillators,” IEEE Journal of Solid- State Circuits , vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 179–194, 1998, doi: 10.1109/4.658619

    1998 doi

  42. [50]

    A study of out-of-band emission in digital transmitters due to pll phase noise, circuit non-linearity, and bandwidth limita- tion,

    M. Oveisi, S. Hosseinisangchi, and P. Heydari, “A study of out-of-band emission in digital transmitters due to pll phase noise, circuit non-linearity, and bandwidth limita- tion,” IEEE Open Journal of Circuits and Systems , 2023

    2023

  43. [51]

    Oscillator phase noise: A tutorial,

    T. H. Lee and A. Hajimiri, “Oscillator phase noise: A tutorial,” IEEE journal of solid-state circuits , vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 326–336, 2000

    2000

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.