Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Analyzing speaker verification embedding extractors and back-ends under language and channel mismatch

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.10300 v1 pith:FB2OUIRK submitted 2022-03-19 eess.AS

classification eess.AS
keywords speakerperformanceback-endembeddinglanguagemismatchpldascoring
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we analyze the behavior and performance of speaker embeddings and the back-end scoring model under domain and language mismatch. We present our findings regarding ResNet-based speaker embedding architectures and show that reduced temporal stride yields improved performance. We then consider a PLDA back-end and show how a combination of small speaker subspace, language-dependent PLDA mixture, and nuisance-attribute projection can have a drastic impact on the performance of the system. Besides, we present an efficient way of scoring and fusing class posterior logit vectors recently shown to perform well for speaker verification task. The experiments are performed using the NIST SRE 2021 setup.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Voiceprint Fallacy: Why Voices Are Not Unique Biometric Imprints

    eess.AS 2026-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Because voices vary with mood, health, age, speaking style, and recording conditions, the voiceprint metaphor is scientifically misleading and voice evidence should be expressed as calibrated degrees of support.

Pith tools