pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.28771 · v1 · pith:FDA7VJ7Qnew · submitted 2026-06-27 · 🧮 math.DS

Abundance of minimal measures via entropy and multifractal analysis

Xiaobo Hou , Wanshan Lin , Xueting Tian , Yi Yuan , Xutong Zhao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 08:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.DS
keywords minimal measuresentropyinvariant measuresexpanding mapsMarkov shiftsmultifractal analysishorseshoe construction
0
0 comments X

The pith

Minimal measures with any prescribed entropy and potential integral are dense among invariant measures for expanding maps, countable Markov shifts, and non-uniform symbolic systems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that in three families of dynamical systems the ergodic minimal measures realizing a fixed entropy value h and a fixed integral a of a continuous potential are dense inside the larger set of all invariant measures that realize the same h and a. This conditional minimal-intermediate-entropy property extends earlier density theorems that applied only to general ergodic measures. A reader cares because minimal measures live on minimal sets, the smallest nonempty closed invariant sets; their abundance means that every entropy-potential pair allowed by the system can be realized on these irreducible pieces. The proofs adapt a multi-horseshoe construction to keep the density intact even when the space is non-compact or the dynamics are non-uniform.

Core claim

The conditional minimal-intermediate-entropy property holds for topologically expanding maps (including topologically Anosov systems), transitive countable Markov shifts, and symbolic systems with non-uniform structure: for any admissible entropy h and potential integral a, the ergodic minimal measures satisfying h_μ(f)=h and ∫φ dμ=a are dense in the set of all invariant measures satisfying the same two conditions. The argument proceeds by a constructive multi-horseshoe technique modified to accommodate non-compactness and non-uniformity.

What carries the argument

The conditional minimal-intermediate-entropy property, which encodes the density of minimal measures with prescribed entropy and potential integral inside the corresponding set of invariant measures.

If this is right

  • Every admissible entropy-potential pair realized by some invariant measure in these systems is also realized by a minimal measure.
  • The set of minimal measures is dense in the space of invariant measures when restricted to level sets of entropy and potential integral.
  • Multifractal spectra computed from invariant measures can be recovered using only minimal measures in the three classes.
  • Minimal sets exist with any entropy value that the system permits.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same density may hold for other classes once a suitable horseshoe construction is found.
  • One could ask whether the minimal measures also realize the same local dimensions or Lyapunov exponents as the general measures at the same (h,a) level.
  • The result supplies a supply of minimal supports for constructing measures with prescribed multifractal properties.

Load-bearing premise

The multi-horseshoe construction can be modified to produce minimal measures while preserving density under non-compactness and non-uniformity.

What would settle it

An explicit topologically expanding map (or transitive countable Markov shift) together with concrete numbers h and a such that an invariant measure achieves them but no minimal measure does.

read the original abstract

This paper investigates the distribution and abundance of minimal measures (measures supported on minimal sets) in various dynamical systems, extending the well-known density results for general ergodic measures. We introduce the conditional minimal-intermediate-entropy property, which asserts that for any given entropy $h$ and potential integral $a$, the set of ergodic minimal measures satisfying $h_\mu(f)=h$ and $\int \varphi d\mu = a$ is dense in the set of invariant measures satisfying these conditions. We establish that the conditional minimal-intermediate-entropy property holds for three broad classes of systems: topologically expanding maps (including topologically Anosov systems), transitive countable Markov shifts, and symbolic systems with non-uniform structure. Our proofs rely on a constructive multi-horseshoe technique adapted to handle challenges of non-compactness and non-uniformity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims to establish the conditional minimal-intermediate-entropy property, asserting that for any entropy h and potential integral a, the ergodic minimal measures satisfying these values are dense among all invariant measures with the same h and a. This is shown for three classes: topologically expanding maps (including topologically Anosov), transitive countable Markov shifts, and symbolic systems with non-uniform structure, via a constructive multi-horseshoe technique adapted to non-compactness and non-uniformity.

Significance. If verified, the result would extend classical density theorems for ergodic measures to the subclass of minimal measures under entropy and potential constraints, providing new information on the abundance and distribution of minimal sets in these systems. The constructive multi-horseshoe approach, if it successfully handles the stated adaptations, would be a methodological strength.

major comments (1)
  1. [Proof for transitive countable Markov shifts] Proof for transitive countable Markov shifts: the adaptation of the multi-horseshoe construction to non-compact spaces must supply uniform tail estimates (e.g., control on return times or the potential outside large compact sets) to ensure that approximating minimal measures do not lose mass at infinity when targeting invariant measures with positive mass far out in the shift space. The abstract states that the technique is adapted, but without explicit verification of such estimates the density claim for this class remains load-bearing and unconfirmed.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract would be clearer if it briefly indicated the specific technical devices used to control mass escape in the countable Markov shift case.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for identifying this important point regarding the countable Markov shifts case. We address the comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Proof for transitive countable Markov shifts: the adaptation of the multi-horseshoe construction to non-compact spaces must supply uniform tail estimates (e.g., control on return times or the potential outside large compact sets) to ensure that approximating minimal measures do not lose mass at infinity when targeting invariant measures with positive mass far out in the shift space. The abstract states that the technique is adapted, but without explicit verification of such estimates the density claim for this class remains load-bearing and unconfirmed.

    Authors: We agree that uniform tail estimates are essential in the non-compact setting to control mass at infinity. In the proof for transitive countable Markov shifts, the multi-horseshoe construction is carried out inside sufficiently large finite subshifts chosen so that the entropy and potential conditions force the approximating measures to concentrate on these sets; transitivity supplies the necessary control on return times and the potential outside compact sets. Nevertheless, we accept that these estimates would benefit from a more explicit and self-contained presentation. In the revised version we will insert a dedicated paragraph (or short subsection) that isolates and verifies the tail bounds, showing directly that the constructed minimal measures inherit the target mass distribution without escape to infinity. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct constructive adaptation of multi-horseshoe technique

full rationale

The paper presents the conditional minimal-intermediate-entropy property as established via an explicit constructive multi-horseshoe technique adapted for non-compactness and non-uniformity in the three classes of systems. No equations or steps reduce by definition to their own inputs, no fitted parameters are relabeled as predictions, and no load-bearing claims rest on self-citations. The derivation is self-contained as a direct construction extending known density results for ergodic measures, with the adaptation itself supplying the new content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the work relies on standard domain assumptions about the dynamical properties of the three system classes and the applicability of horseshoe constructions; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Topologically expanding maps, transitive countable Markov shifts, and symbolic systems with non-uniform structure admit the required multi-horseshoe constructions for density of minimal measures.
    Invoked to establish the conditional property for these classes as described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5680 in / 1382 out tokens · 33191 ms · 2026-06-30T08:42:15.956843+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Sigmund, K.: On dynamical systems with the specification property. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 190, 285–299 (1974)https://doi.org/10.2307/1996963

    work page doi:10.2307/1996963 1974

  2. [2]

    Ergodic Theory Dynam

    Gelfert, K., Kwietniak, D.: On density of ergodic measures and generic points. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems38(5), 1745–1767 (2018)https://doi.org/10.1017/etds.2016.97

    work page doi:10.1017/etds.2016.97 2018

  3. [3]

    Eizenberg, A., Kifer, Y., Weiss, B.: Large deviations forZ d-actions. Comm. Math. Phys. 164(3), 433–454 (1994)

    1994

  4. [4]

    Applications to theβ-shifts

    Pfister, C.-E., Sullivan, W.G.: Large deviations estimates for dynamical systems without the specification property. Applications to theβ-shifts. Nonlinearity18(1), 237–261 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1088/0951-7715/18/1/013

    work page doi:10.1088/0951-7715/18/1/013 2005

  5. [5]

    Dong, Y., Hou, X., Tian, X.: Abundance of smale’s horseshoes and ergodic measures via multifractal analysis and various quantitative spectrums (2024) arXiv:2207.02403 [math.DS]

    work page arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Boshernitzan, M.: A unique ergodicity of minimal symbolic flows with linear block growth. J. Analyse Math.44, 77–96 (1984/85)https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02790191

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02790191 1984

  7. [7]

    Cyr, V., Kra, B.: Counting generic measures for a subshift of linear growth. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS)21(2), 355–380 (2019)https://doi.org/10.4171/JEMS/838

    work page doi:10.4171/jems/838 2019

  8. [8]

    Grillenberger, C.: Constructions of strictly ergodic systems. I. Given entropy. Z. Wahrschein- lichkeitstheorie und Verw. Gebiete25, 323–334 (1972/73)https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF00537161

    1972

  9. [9]

    Ergodic Theory Dynam

    Li, J., Oprocha, P.: Properties of invariant measures in dynamical systems with the shadowing property. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems38(6), 2257–2294 (2018)https://doi.org/10. 1017/etds.2016.125

    2018

  10. [10]

    Dong, Y., Tian, X.: Different statistical future of dynamical orbits over expanding or hyper- bolic systems (ii): Nonempty syndetic center (2018) arXiv:1803.06796 [math.DS]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  11. [11]

    Chang, Y., Li, B., Wu, M.: On orbit complexity of dynamical systems: intermediate value property and level set related to a furstenberg problem (2024) arXiv:2408.04010 [math.DS]

    work page arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Arbieto, A., Oprocha, P., Rego, E.: Entropy flexibility of dynamical systems (2025) arXiv:2507.11048 [math.DS]

    work page arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Climenhaga, V., Thompson, D.J., Yamamoto, K.: Large deviations for systems with non- uniform structure. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.369(6), 4167–4192 (2017)https://doi.org/10. 1090/tran/6786

    2017

  14. [14]

    Katok, A.: Lyapunov exponents, entropy and periodic orbits for diffeomorphisms. Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci. Publ. Math. (51), 137–173 (1980)

    1980

  15. [15]

    North-Holland Mathematical Library, vol

    Aoki, N., Hiraide, K.: Topological Theory of Dynamical Systems. North-Holland Mathematical Library, vol. 52, p. 416. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam (1994). Recent advances

    1994

  16. [16]

    Gureviˇ c, B.M.: Shift entropy and Markov measures in the space of paths of a countable graph. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR192, 963–965 (1970) 46

    1970

  17. [17]

    Barreira, L., Saussol, B.: Variational principles and mixed multifractal spectra. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.353(10), 3919–3944 (2001)https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-01-02844-6

    work page doi:10.1090/s0002-9947-01-02844-6 2001

  18. [18]

    Ergodic Theory Dynam

    Takens, F., Verbitskiy, E.: On the variational principle for the topological entropy of certain non-compact sets. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems23(1), 317–348 (2003)https://doi.org/ 10.1017/S0143385702000913

    work page doi:10.1017/s0143385702000913 2003

  19. [19]

    Ergodic Theory Dynam

    Pfister, C.-E., Sullivan, W.G.: On the topological entropy of saturated sets. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems27(3), 929–956 (2007)https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143385706000824

    work page doi:10.1017/s0143385706000824 2007

  20. [20]

    En- cyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, vol

    Katok, A., Hasselblatt, B.: Introduction to the Modern Theory of Dynamical Systems. En- cyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, vol. 54, p. 802. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995).https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809187. With a supplementary chapter by Katok and Leonardo Mendoza

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511809187 1995

  21. [21]

    In: The Structure of Attractors in Dynamical Systems (Proc

    Walters, P.: On the pseudo-orbit tracing property and its relationship to stability. In: The Structure of Attractors in Dynamical Systems (Proc. Conf., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, N.D., 1977). Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 668, pp. 231–244. Springer, Berlin-New York (1978)

    1977

  22. [22]

    Ergodic Theory Dynam

    Iommi, G., Jordan, T.: Multifractal analysis of Birkhoff averages for countable Markov maps. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems35(8), 2559–2586 (2015)https://doi.org/10.1017/etds. 2015.44

    work page doi:10.1017/etds 2015

  23. [23]

    Pollicott, M., Weiss, H.: Multifractal analysis of Lyapunov exponent for continued fraction and Manneville-Pomeau transformations and applications to Diophantine approximation. Comm. Math. Phys.207(1), 145–171 (1999)https://doi.org/10.1007/s002200050722

    work page doi:10.1007/s002200050722 1999

  24. [24]

    Iommi, G., Todd, M., Velozo, A.: Escape of entropy for countable Markov shifts. Adv. Math. 405, 108507–54 (2022)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2022.108507

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aim.2022.108507 2022

  25. [25]

    Takahasi, H.: Entropy-approachability for transitive Markov shifts over infinite alphabet. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.148(9), 3847–3857 (2020)https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/14637

    work page doi:10.1090/proc/14637 2020

  26. [26]

    Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fun- damental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], vol

    Villani, C.: Optimal Transport. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fun- damental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], vol. 338, p. 973. Springer, Berlin (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71050-9. Old and new

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-540-71050-9 2009

  27. [27]

    Bowen, R.: Topological entropy for noncompact sets. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.184, 125–136 (1973)https://doi.org/10.2307/1996403

    work page doi:10.2307/1996403 1973

  28. [28]

    In: Global Analysis (Proc

    Bowen, R.: Topological entropy and axiom A. In: Global Analysis (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Vols. XIV, XV, XVI, Berkeley, Calif., 1968). Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., vol. XIV-XVI, pp. 23–41. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, R.I. (1970)

    1968

  29. [29]

    Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol

    Walters, P.: An Introduction to Ergodic Theory. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 79, p

  30. [30]

    Springer, New York-Berlin (1982)

    1982

  31. [31]

    Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol

    Viana, M., Oliveira, K.: Foundations of Ergodic Theory. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 151, p. 530. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2016).https://doi. org/10.1017/CBO9781316422601

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781316422601 2016

  32. [32]

    Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol

    Denker, M., Grillenberger, C., Sigmund, K.: Ergodic Theory on Compact Spaces. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. Vol. 527, p. 360. Springer, Berlin-New York (1976) 47

    1976

  33. [33]

    In: Dynamics and Numbers

    Kwietniak, D., L¸ acka, M., Oprocha, P.: A panorama of specification-like properties and their consequences. In: Dynamics and Numbers. Contemp. Math., vol. 669, pp. 155–186. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI (2016).https://doi.org/10.1090/conm/669/13428

    work page doi:10.1090/conm/669/13428 2016

  34. [34]

    Dong, Y., Hou, X., Tian, X.: Twelve different statistical future of dynamical orbits: Empty syndetic center (2022) arXiv:1701.01910v4 [math.DS]

    work page arXiv 2022

  35. [35]

    Topology Appl.158(16), 2232–2239 (2011)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.topol

    Moothathu, T.K.S.: Implications of pseudo-orbit tracing property for continuous maps on compacta. Topology Appl.158(16), 2232–2239 (2011)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.topol. 2011.07.016

    work page doi:10.1016/j.topol 2011

  36. [36]

    Discrete Contin

    Sun, W., Tian, X.: Dominated splitting and Pesin’s entropy formula. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst.32(4), 1421–1434 (2012)https://doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2012.32.1421

    work page doi:10.3934/dcds.2012.32.1421 2012

  37. [37]

    Universitext, p

    Kitchens, B.P.: Symbolic Dynamics. Universitext, p. 252. Springer, Berlin (1998).https: //doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58822-8. One-sided, two-sided and countable state Markov shifts

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-58822-8 1998

  38. [38]

    Bogachev, V.I.: Measure Theory. Vol. I, II, pp. 500–575. Springer, Berlin (2007).https: //doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-34514-5

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-540-34514-5 2007

  39. [39]

    Israel J

    Handel, M., Kitchens, B.: Metrics and entropy for non-compact spaces. Israel J. Math.91(1- 3), 253–271 (1995)https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02761650. With an appendix by Daniel J. Rudolph

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02761650 1995

  40. [40]

    Gureviˇ c, B.M.: Topological entropy of a countable Markov chain. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 187, 715–718 (1969)

    1969

  41. [41]

    , TITLE =

    Sarig, O.M.: Thermodynamic formalism for countable Markov shifts. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems19(6), 1565–1593 (1999)https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143385799146820

    work page doi:10.1017/s0143385799146820 1999

  42. [42]

    Nonlinearity33(10), 5355–5382 (2020)https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6544/ab949a

    P´ erez Pereira, F.: Dimension of Gibbs measures with infinite entropy. Nonlinearity33(10), 5355–5382 (2020)https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6544/ab949a

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6544/ab949a 2020

  43. [43]

    Zhao, C., Chen, E.: On the topological pressure of the saturated set with non-uniform struc- ture. Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal.51(1), 313–329 (2018)https://doi.org/10.12775/ tmna.2017.048

    2018

  44. [44]

    Avila, A., Crovisier, S., Wilkinson, A.:C 1 density of stable ergodicity. Adv. Math.379, 107496–68 (2021)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2020.107496

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aim.2020.107496 2021

  45. [45]

    Tian, X.: Different asymptotic behavior versus same dynamical complexity: recurrence & (ir)regularity. Adv. Math.288, 464–526 (2016)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2015.11. 006 48

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aim.2015.11 2016