Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Scale dependent non-Gaussianities in the CMB data identified with Minkowski Functionals and Scaling Indices

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1209.5106 v1 pith:FF5PPOW5 submitted 2012-09-23 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords mapsfindrangedatalow-loriginalwmapanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In order to test for non-Gaussianities with respect to scale-dependencies we use so-called surrogate maps, in which possible phase correlations of the Fourier phases of the original WMAP data and simulations, respectively, are destroyed by applying a shuffling scheme to the maps. A statistical comparison of the original maps with the surrogate maps then allows to test for the existence of higher order correlations in the original maps, also and especially on well-defined Fourier modes. Using Minkowski functionals as an image analysis technique we calculate the deviation between the original data and 500 surrogates for different hemispheres in the sky and find ecliptic hemispherical asymmetries between northern and southern ecliptic sky. We find strong deviations from Gaussianity in the WMAP data when considering the low-l range with l = [2,20]. The analysis technique of the scaling indices leads to a slightly lower deviation. Although the underlying foreground reduction methods of the maps differ from each other, we find similar results for the WMAP 7yr ILC map and the WMAP 7yr (needlet-based) NILC map in the low-l range. Our results point once more to a cosmological nature of the signal. For a higher l range with l = [120,300] the results differ between the two image analysis techniques and between the two maps which makes an intrinsic nature of the signal on this l range less likely. When we decrease the size of the analysed sky regions for the low-l study, we do not find signatures of NG in the northern sky. In the south we find individual spots which show deviations from Gaussianity. In addition, we investigate non-Gaussian CMB simulations that depend on the f_NL parameter of the local type. These simulations cannot account for the detected signatures on the low-l range.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools