Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Network-Controlled Repeaters vs. Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces for 6G mmW Coverage Extension

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.08033 v1 pith:FGPWRJA5 submitted 2022-11-15 eess.SP

classification eess.SP
keywords coverageextensionintelligentnetwork-controlledonlyphysicalreconfigurablerepeaters
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Network-controlled repeaters (NCR) and reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS) are being considered by the third generation partnership project (3GPP) as valid candidates for range extension in millimeter-wave (mmW, 30-300 GHz frequency) 5G and 6G networks, to counteract large path and penetration losses. Nowadays, there is no definite answer on which of the two technologies is better for coverage extension, since existing comparative studies focused either on communication-related metrics only or on very large-scale analysis, without physical layer details or environmental considerations. This paper aims at comparing NCR and RIS solutions in terms of coverage in an urban scenario. Numerical results suggest a possible usage of both technologies, showing that preferring RIS or NCR depends not only on their physical capabilities and cost (e.g., the number of antenna elements, the angular separation between panels for NCR, etc.) but also on environment geometry.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools