pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.00860 · v1 · pith:FGZK5XFYnew · submitted 2019-07-01 · 📡 eess.SP

Energy Efficient Transmission Based on Grouped Spatial Modulation for upstream DSL Systems

Jiankang Zhang , Chao Xu , Tong Bai , Fasong Wang , Shida Zhong This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 11:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords DSLspatial modulationenergy efficiencyupstream transmissioncrosstalkturbo detectionvectoringpower consumption
0
0 comments X

The pith

Grouped spatial modulation in upstream DSL activates one line per user to cut transmitter power while sending extra bits via line choice.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that treating each user's two copper pairs as a group and activating only one line at a time reduces power draw at the upstream transmitters. Virtual bits are sent by the pattern of which line activates, offsetting the rate loss from fewer active lines. Soft turbo detectors tailored to DSL channel properties remove the usual spatial-modulation error-propagation problem. Simulations across multiple loop lengths and power levels show the scheme beats conventional vectoring on energy efficiency.

Core claim

By viewing the two pairs per customer as a group and activating a single copper line per user, the scheme reduces transmit power while the choice of active line conveys virtual bits in addition to the usual constellation symbols; near-optimal soft turbo detectors exploit DSL-specific channel structure to suppress error propagation, yielding higher energy efficiency than vectoring for every examined loop length and transmit power.

What carries the argument

Grouped spatial modulation, which treats each user's copper-pair bundle as one group and activates only one line inside it, thereby cutting power and crosstalk while embedding virtual bits in the activation pattern.

If this is right

  • Transmitter power falls because only one line per user is driven.
  • Virtual bits from line selection offset the rate reduction from fewer active lines.
  • Energy efficiency exceeds that of vectoring across all tested loop lengths and power levels.
  • The soft detectors keep bit-error performance usable by removing the classic spatial-modulation error floor.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same grouping idea could be tested on four-pair bundles or on downstream links where power is also a concern.
  • If the efficiency gain survives field trials, operators might reconsider vectoring as the default in areas still served by copper.
  • The DSL-tailored turbo detector structure might transfer to other wired channels that exhibit strong but known crosstalk patterns.

Load-bearing premise

The DSL channel model and crosstalk statistics in the simulations match real deployed loops, and the soft turbo detector removes error propagation without creating new error floors.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of transmitter energy consumption and bit-error rate on actual installed multi-pair loops, comparing the grouped scheme against vectoring at the same total power and rate targets.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.00860 by Chao Xu, Fasong Wang, Jiankang Zhang, Shida Zhong, Tong Bai.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: An example of the proposed group-based SM for the upstream DSL system, which supports [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Measurement of the crosstalk channel of a 200 meter BT cable [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Schematic of the SOSD-I. The subscripts d and c of L are associated with the LLR calculator and channel decoder, respectively, while the subscripts pr, po and e are used for representing the a priori, a posteriori and extrinsic information. The tone index of k is omitted in this figure for avoiding confusion. Then, the activated channel of group u can also be detected on the basis of the group as follows m… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Schematic of the SOSD-II. The subscripts [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Energy efficiency when operating exactly at the CCMC capacity at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Energy efficiency when operating exactly at the DCMC capacity at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Energy efficiency when operating exactly at the DCMC capacity at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Energy efficiency when operating exactly at the DCMC capacity at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Comparison of energy efficiency of (N = 2, M = 2) and (N = 3, M = 2) when operating at the DCMC capacity and at a loop length of 400 m. The results were calculated by substituting Eq. (51) and Eq. (49) into Eq. (53) and Eq. (54), respectively. mission has almost the same energy efficiency at frequencies of fc = 26.975 MHz and fc = 51.975 MHz. However, the energy efficiency of the proposed group-based SM a… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: In order to clearly illustrate the gain achieved gain at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Comparison of the average BER upon increasing the DSL length. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Comparison of the total achievable capacity and the average BER [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_14.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The digital Subscriber Line (DSL) remains an important component of heterogeneous networking, especially in historic city-centers, where using optical fibre is less realistic. Recently, the power consumption has become an important performance metric in telecommunication due to the associated environmental issues. In the recent bonding model, customer sites have been equipped with two/four copper pairs, which may be exploited for designing grouped spatial modulation (SM) aiming for reducing the power consumption and mitigating the stubborn crosstalk in DSL communications. Explicitly, we view the two pair copper pairs equipped for each user as a group and propose an energy efficient transmission scheme based on grouped SM strategy for the upstream DSL systems, which is capable of reducing the power consumption of the upstream transmitters by activating a single copper line of each user. More especially, in order to compensate for the potential bit-rate reduction imposed by reducing the number of activated lines, the proposed scheme implicitly delivers ``virtual bits" via activating/deactivating the lines in addition to the classic modulation scheme. This is particularly beneficial in the DSL context, because the cross-talk imposed by activating several lines may swamp the desired signal. Furthermore, a pair of near-optimal soft turbo detection schemes are proposed for exploiting the unique properties of the DSL channel in order to eliminate the error propagation problem of SM detection routinely encountered in wireless channels. Both the attainable energy-efficiency and the achievable Bit Error Ratio (BER) are investigated. Our simulation results demonstrate that the proposed group-based SM is capable of outperforming the vectoring scheme both in terms of its energy efficiency for all the examined loop lengths and transmit powers.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an energy-efficient upstream DSL transmission scheme based on grouped spatial modulation (SM), where each user's two copper pairs form a group and only one line is activated per user to reduce power while conveying additional 'virtual bits' via the activation pattern. It introduces two near-optimal soft turbo detectors exploiting DSL channel properties to mitigate SM error propagation, and reports via simulations that the scheme outperforms conventional vectoring in energy efficiency across all examined loop lengths and transmit powers, while also presenting BER results.

Significance. If the simulation-based claims hold under representative real-world DSL conditions, the work could contribute to reducing power consumption in legacy copper networks without rate loss, addressing environmental concerns in DSL deployments. The tailored soft turbo detectors represent a domain-specific adaptation that addresses a known SM limitation. However, the absence of analytical derivations, parameter-free results, or measured-channel validation limits the immediate impact relative to purely simulation-driven contributions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Simulation Results] § on simulation setup (results section): The central claim that grouped SM outperforms vectoring in energy efficiency for all loop lengths and transmit powers is supported solely by unspecified simulations; no details are provided on the DSL channel model (e.g., BT/ANSI parameters), crosstalk statistics, loop length distributions, or data exclusion rules, which directly undermines verification of the 'representative' assumption required for the claim.
  2. [Performance Evaluation] BER and EE performance figures: No error bars, number of Monte Carlo trials, or convergence criteria for the turbo detector iterations are reported, so the absence of error floors and the consistent outperformance cannot be assessed for statistical reliability or SNR dependence.
  3. [Detection Scheme] Detector description: The assertion that the soft turbo detectors 'fully eliminate' error propagation typical of SM is load-bearing for the BER claims but lacks either an analytical bound on residual error or explicit demonstration (e.g., via EXIT charts or floor-free SNR ranges) that no new floors are introduced at the operating points shown.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: 'two pair copper pairs' is redundant; 'More especially' should be 'More specifically'.
  2. [System Model] Notation: The mapping from activation patterns to virtual bits is described qualitatively but would benefit from an explicit equation or table showing the rate calculation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point-by-point below, providing the strongest honest defense possible while committing to revisions that improve reproducibility and clarity without overstating our simulation-based results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Simulation Results] § on simulation setup (results section): The central claim that grouped SM outperforms vectoring in energy efficiency for all loop lengths and transmit powers is supported solely by unspecified simulations; no details are provided on the DSL channel model (e.g., BT/ANSI parameters), crosstalk statistics, loop length distributions, or data exclusion rules, which directly undermines verification of the 'representative' assumption required for the claim.

    Authors: We agree that the simulation setup section requires more explicit details to support reproducibility and the representativeness of the results. In the revised manuscript we will add the specific DSL channel models employed (including BT/ANSI parameters), crosstalk statistics, loop length distributions, and any data exclusion or averaging rules applied. This directly addresses the verification concern while preserving the simulation-driven nature of the contribution. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Performance Evaluation] BER and EE performance figures: No error bars, number of Monte Carlo trials, or convergence criteria for the turbo detector iterations are reported, so the absence of error floors and the consistent outperformance cannot be assessed for statistical reliability or SNR dependence.

    Authors: We accept that these statistical details were omitted. The revised manuscript will report the number of Monte Carlo trials per point, include error bars on the BER and energy-efficiency curves, and specify the convergence criteria or maximum iteration counts used for the turbo detectors. These additions will allow readers to evaluate the reliability of the reported absence of floors and the outperformance claims. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Detection Scheme] Detector description: The assertion that the soft turbo detectors 'fully eliminate' error propagation typical of SM is load-bearing for the BER claims but lacks either an analytical bound on residual error or explicit demonstration (e.g., via EXIT charts or floor-free SNR ranges) that no new floors are introduced at the operating points shown.

    Authors: The manuscript supports the mitigation of error propagation through simulation results that exhibit no observable error floors within the examined SNR ranges and loop lengths. We do not claim a universal analytical elimination and agree that an analytical bound lies outside the paper's scope. In revision we will temper the wording to reflect simulation-based mitigation rather than absolute elimination, and we will add discussion of the observed floor-free ranges; EXIT-chart analysis can be included if space allows. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: proposal and simulation results are independent of self-referential inputs

full rationale

The paper introduces a grouped spatial modulation scheme for upstream DSL and evaluates energy efficiency and BER via simulations. No equations, fitted parameters, or derivation steps are shown that reduce by construction to the inputs. No self-citations are invoked to justify uniqueness theorems, ansatzes, or load-bearing premises. The central claims rest on simulation outcomes using stated channel models, which constitute independent empirical content rather than tautological renaming or prediction-by-fit. This is the expected non-finding for a simulation-driven engineering proposal.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the performance claim rests on an implicit assumption that the simulated DSL channel statistics and detection algorithm behave as described.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5824 in / 1055 out tokens · 27264 ms · 2026-05-25T11:47:28.357609+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Impulsive noise mitigation in digital subscriber lines: the state-of- the-art and research opportunities,

    T. Bai, H. Zhang, J. Zhang, C. Xu, A. F. Al Rawi, and L. Hanzo, “Impulsive noise mitigation in digital subscriber lines: the state-of- the-art and research opportunities,” IEEE Communications Magazine , vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 145–151, May 2019

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    The ITU-T’s new G.vector standard proliferates 100 Mb/s DSL,

    V . Oksman, H. Schenk, A. Clausen, J. M. Cioffi, M. Mohseni, G. Ginis, C. Nuzman, J. Maes, M. Peeters, K. D. Fisher et al., “The ITU-T’s new G.vector standard proliferates 100 Mb/s DSL,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 140–148, October 2010

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    Acatauassu, I

    D. Acatauassu, I. Almeida, F. Muller, A. Klautau, C. Lu, K. Ericson, and B. Dortschy, Measurement and Modeling Techniques for the Fourth Generation Broadband Over Copper, Advanced Topics in Measurements. InTech, 2012

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    Differential evolution algorithm aided turbo channel estimation and multi-User detection for G. fast systems in the presence of FEXT,

    J. Zhang, S. Chen, R. Zhang, A. F. A. Rawi, and L. Hanzo, “Differential evolution algorithm aided turbo channel estimation and multi-User detection for G. fast systems in the presence of FEXT,” IEEE Access , vol. 6, pp. 33 111–33 128, June 2018

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Analytical performance evaluation of VDSL2,

    F. Mazzenga and R. Giuliano, “Analytical performance evaluation of VDSL2,” IEEE Communications Letters , vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 44–47, January 2017

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Log-normal approximation for VDSL performance evaluation,

    ——, “Log-normal approximation for VDSL performance evaluation,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 64, no. 12, pp. 5266–5277, December 2016

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Performance of HARQ-Assisted OFDM Systems Contaminated by Impulsive Noise: Finite-Length LDPC Code Analysis,

    T. Bai, C. Xu, R. Zhang, A. F. Al Rawi, and L. Hanzo, “Performance of HARQ-Assisted OFDM Systems Contaminated by Impulsive Noise: Finite-Length LDPC Code Analysis,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 14 112– 14 123, January 2019

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Power-efficient copper access,

    M. Guenach, C. Nuzman, J. Maes, M. Peeters, Y . Li, D. Van Bruyssel, and F. Defoort, “Power-efficient copper access,” Bell Labs Technical Journal, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 117–129, 2010

    work page 2010

  9. [9]

    Discrete multi-tone digital subscriber loop performance in the face of impulsive noise,

    T. Bai, H. Zhang, R. Zhang, L.-L. Yang, A. F. Al Rawi, J. Zhang, and L. Hanzo, “Discrete multi-tone digital subscriber loop performance in the face of impulsive noise,” IEEE Access , vol. 5, pp. 10 478–10 495, June 2017

    work page 2017

  10. [10]

    The ITU-T’s new G.fast standard brings DSL into the Gigabit era,

    V . Oksman, R. Strobel, X. Wang, D. Wei, R. Verbin, R. Goodson, and M. Sorbara, “The ITU-T’s new G.fast standard brings DSL into the Gigabit era,” IEEE Communications Magazine , vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 118– 126, March 2016

    work page 2016

  11. [11]

    Dynamic spectrum management for energy-efficient transmission in DSL,

    M. Wolkerstorfer, D. Statovci, and T. Nordstr ¨om, “Dynamic spectrum management for energy-efficient transmission in DSL,” in Proceedings of 11th IEEE Singapore International Conference on Communication Systems. Guangzhou, China: IEEE, November 2008, pp. 1015–1020

    work page 2008

  12. [12]

    Energy consumption in wired and wireless access networks,

    J. Baliga, R. Ayre, K. Hinton, and R. S. Tucker, “Energy consumption in wired and wireless access networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine , vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 70–77, June 2011

    work page 2011

  13. [13]

    Energy efficiency–spectral efficiency tradeoff: A multiobjective optimization approach,

    O. Amin, E. Bedeer, M. H. Ahmed, and O. A. Dobre, “Energy efficiency–spectral efficiency tradeoff: A multiobjective optimization approach,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology , vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 1975–1981, April 2015

    work page 1975

  14. [14]

    Dynamic spectrum management for next-generation DSL systems,

    K. B. Song, S. T. Chung, G. Ginis, and J. M. Cioffi, “Dynamic spectrum management for next-generation DSL systems,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 101–109, October 2002

    work page 2002

  15. [15]

    On power optimiza- tion in DSL systems,

    M. Guenach, C. Nuzman, J. Maes, and M. Peeters, “On power optimiza- tion in DSL systems,” in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops. Dresden, Germany: IEEE, June 2009, pp. 1–5

    work page 2009

  16. [16]

    Trading off rate and power consumption in DSL systems,

    ——, “Trading off rate and power consumption in DSL systems,” in Proceedings of IEEE GLOBECOM International Workshop on Green Communications, Honolulu, US, November 2009, pp. 1–5

    work page 2009

  17. [17]

    Energy management of DSL systems: Experimental findings,

    M. Guenach, M. B. Ghorbel, C. Nuzman, K. Hooghe, M. Timmers, and J. Maes, “Energy management of DSL systems: Experimental findings,” in Proceedings of IEEE Global Communications Conference . Atlanta, USA: IEEE, December 2013, pp. 2779–2784

    work page 2013

  18. [18]

    Energy- efficient DSL using Vectoring,

    G. Marrocco, M. Wolkerstorfer, T. Nordstr ¨om, and D. Statovci, “Energy- efficient DSL using Vectoring,” inProceedings of IEEE Global Telecom- munications Conference. Houston, TX, USA: IEEE, December 2011, pp. 1–6

    work page 2011

  19. [19]

    A near- optimal linear crosstalk canceler for upstream VDSL,

    R. Cendrillon, G. Ginis, E. Van den Bogaert, and M. Moonen, “A near- optimal linear crosstalk canceler for upstream VDSL,” IEEE Transac- tions on Signal Processing, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 3136–3146, August 2006

    work page 2006

  20. [20]

    Energy efficient discontinuous operation in vectored G. fast,

    J. Maes and C. Nuzman, “Energy efficient discontinuous operation in vectored G. fast,” in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications. Sydney, Australia: IEEE, June 2014, pp. 3854–3858

    work page 2014

  21. [21]

    Spatial modulation,

    R. Y . Mesleh, H. Haas, S. Sinanovi ´c, C. W. Ahn, and S. Yun, “Spatial modulation,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 2228–2241, July 2008

    work page 2008

  22. [22]

    Spa- tial modulation for generalized MIMO: Challenges, opportunities, and implementation,

    M. Di Renzo, H. Haas, A. Ghrayeb, S. Sugiura, and L. Hanzo, “Spa- tial modulation for generalized MIMO: Challenges, opportunities, and implementation,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 56–103, January 2014

    work page 2014

  23. [23]

    An energy saving base station employing spatial modulation,

    A. Stavridis, S. Sinanovic, M. D. Renzo, H. Haas, and P. Grant, “An energy saving base station employing spatial modulation,” in Proceed- ings of IEEE 17th International Workshop on Computer Aided Modeling and Design of Communication Links and Networks . Barcelona, Spain: IEEE, September 2012, pp. 231–235

    work page 2012

  24. [24]

    XG-fast: the 5th generation broadband,

    W. Coomans, R. B. Moraes, K. Hooghe, A. Duque, J. Galaro, M. Tim- mers, A. J. van Wijngaarden, M. Guenach, and J. Maes, “XG-fast: the 5th generation broadband,” IEEE Communications Magazine , vol. 53, no. 12, pp. 83–88, December 2015

    work page 2015

  25. [25]

    The sub-band vectoring technique for multi-operator environments,

    F. Vatalaro, F. Mazzenga, and R. Giuliano, “The sub-band vectoring technique for multi-operator environments,” IEEE Access , vol. 4, pp. 3310–3321, June 2016

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    PLC-to-DSL interference: Statistical model and impact on VDSL2, vectoring, and G. Fast,

    S. Galli, K. J. Kerpez, H. Mariotte, and F. Moulin, “PLC-to-DSL interference: Statistical model and impact on VDSL2, vectoring, and G. Fast,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications , vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 1992–2005, July 2016

    work page 1992

  27. [27]

    Vectored DSL: benefits and challenges for service providers,

    R. Zidane, S. Huberman, C. Leung, and T. Le-Ngoc, “Vectored DSL: benefits and challenges for service providers,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 152–157, February 2013

    work page 2013

  28. [28]

    Vectored transmission for digital subscriber line systems,

    G. Ginis and J. M. Cioffi, “Vectored transmission for digital subscriber line systems,” IEEE Journal on selected areas in communications , vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1085–1104, August 2002

    work page 2002

  29. [29]

    Performance of linear minimum-output energy receiver for self and alien crosstalk mitigation in upstream vectored very high-speed digital subscriber line,

    S. M. Zafaruddin, S. Prakriya, and S. Prasad, “Performance of linear minimum-output energy receiver for self and alien crosstalk mitigation in upstream vectored very high-speed digital subscriber line,” IET Communications, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 862–871, April 2015

    work page 2015

  30. [30]

    Spatial modulation and space-time shift keying: optimal performance at a reduced detection complexity,

    C. Xu, S. Sugiura, S. X. Ng, and L. Hanzo, “Spatial modulation and space-time shift keying: optimal performance at a reduced detection complexity,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 206–216, January 2013

    work page 2013

  31. [31]

    Spatial modulation: optimal detection and performance analysis,

    J. Jeganathan, A. Ghrayeb, and L. Szczecinski, “Spatial modulation: optimal detection and performance analysis,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 545–547, August 2008

    work page 2008

  32. [32]

    Turbo multi-user detection for OFDM/SDMA systems relying on differential evolution aided iterative channel estimation,

    J. Zhang, S. Chen, X. Mu, and L. Hanzo, “Turbo multi-user detection for OFDM/SDMA systems relying on differential evolution aided iterative channel estimation,” IEEE Transactions on Communications , vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 1621–1633, June 2012

    work page 2012

  33. [33]

    Evolutionary-algorithm-assisted joint channel estimation and turbo multiuser detection/decoding for OFDM/SDMA,

    ——, “Evolutionary-algorithm-assisted joint channel estimation and turbo multiuser detection/decoding for OFDM/SDMA,” IEEE Transac- tions on Vehicular Technology , vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 1204–1222, March 2014. 14

    work page 2014

  34. [34]

    Optimum and sub-optimum detection of coded data disturbed by time-varying intersymbol interference [applicable to digital mobile radio receivers],

    W. Koch and A. Baier, “Optimum and sub-optimum detection of coded data disturbed by time-varying intersymbol interference [applicable to digital mobile radio receivers],” in Proceedings of IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference. San Diego, US: IEEE, December 1990, pp. 1679–1684

    work page 1990

  35. [35]

    Information-guided channel-hopping for high data rate wireless communication,

    Y . Yang and B. Jiao, “Information-guided channel-hopping for high data rate wireless communication,” IEEE Communications Letters , vol. 12, no. 4, April 2008

    work page 2008

  36. [36]

    On the MIMO channel capacity of multi- dimensional signal sets,

    S. Xin Ng and L. Hanzo, “On the MIMO channel capacity of multi- dimensional signal sets,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology , vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 528–536, March 2006

    work page 2006

  37. [37]

    Space shift keying modulation for MIMO channels,

    J. Jeganathan, A. Ghrayeb, L. Szczecinski, and A. Ceron, “Space shift keying modulation for MIMO channels,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 3692–3703, July 2009

    work page 2009

  38. [38]

    Coherent and differential space- time shift keying: A dispersion matrix approach,

    S. Sugiura, S. Chen, and L. Hanzo, “Coherent and differential space- time shift keying: A dispersion matrix approach,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 3219–3230, November 2010

    work page 2010

  39. [39]

    Design guidelines for spatial modulation,

    P. Yang, M. Di Renzo, Y . Xiao, S. Li, and L. Hanzo, “Design guidelines for spatial modulation,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 6–26, Firstquarter 2015

    work page 2015

  40. [40]

    Reduced-complexity ML de- tection and capacity-optimized training for spatial modulation systems,

    R. Rajashekar, K. Hari, and L. Hanzo, “Reduced-complexity ML de- tection and capacity-optimized training for spatial modulation systems,” IEEE Transactions on Communications , vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 112–125, January 2014

    work page 2014

  41. [41]

    Mod- eling and optimization of the line-driver power consumption in xDSL systems,

    M. Wolkerstorfer, S. Trautmann, T. Nordstr ¨om, and B. D. Putra, “Mod- eling and optimization of the line-driver power consumption in xDSL systems,” EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing , vol. 2012, no. 1, pp. 1–15, January 2012

    work page 2012