Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 37 references

Electrode and electroactive polymer layout design using topology optimization

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that electrode and electroactive polymer layouts can be designed together by density-based multi-material topology optimization, with continuous electrode paths concentrating the electric field in the active layer.

desk verdict The genuinely new thing is simultaneous electrode/EAP layout optimization, but the electrode is only a high-permittivity dielectric proxy and the paper never checks that it behaves like a conductor. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.03256 v1 pith:FHEE74DE submitted 2024-12-04 cs.CE

Daniel H{aa}rd , Mathias Wallin , Matti Ristinmaa This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CE MSC 74P1574F15
keywords multi-materialtopologyoptimizationelectroactivepolymerdielectricelastomeractuatorexponentialmaterialinterpolationelectrodelayoutdesigntruncatedfreespaceadjointsensitivityanalysiselectromechanicalcoupling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to remove the usual assumption that the electrode and electroactive polymer regions of an actuator are fixed in advance. It proposes a density-based, multi-material topology optimization in which two density fields decide, element by element, whether the material is void, electrode, or electroactive polymer, and the optimizer freely arranges all three phases to maximize a chosen output displacement. The authors show in two numerical examples that the resulting designs place electrode material in continuous paths from the electrical sources to opposite sides of a thin EAP layer, which concentrates the electric field in the layer that drives deformation. This matters because electrode placement is normally a major constraint in EAP actuator design, and letting the optimizer choose it opens the door to unconventional actuator geometries.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing device is the Exponential Material Interpolation (EMI), the interpolation law $\chi_q(\bar\rho) = (e^{q\bar\rho}-1)/(e^q-1)$ that maps element densities to the material parameters $K$, $G$, $\varepsilon_r$, and $c_e$ for three phases: void, electrode, and electroactive polymer. Unlike the SIMP interpolation it is compared against, the sign of $q$ decides whether high sensitivities occur at $\bar\rho=0$ or $\bar\rho=1$, giving the optimizer control over which phase is favored, and the two density fields are combined in a nested, order-independent way. The scheme is paired with a Helmholtz-type PDE filter and a smooth Heaviside projection for regularization, an intermediate-density penalization, and a truncated extended free-space domain modeled as a very soft dielectric with vacuum permittivity; the electro-mechanical coupling terms are penalized more heavily than the mechanical terms. The design updates are made with the method of moving asymptotes, with displacement-objective sensitivities computed by an adjoint solve of the coupled stiffness matrix.

What would settle it

Recompute the two examples with the electrode phase represented by a true equipotential conductor boundary and with the free-space domain doubled in extent; if the connected-electrode topology changes or the reported displacements (-0.399 mm and -0.137 mm) shift noticeably, the central claim is in doubt. A physical prototype of the vertical-actuation design, driven at 3 kV, would also settle whether the concentrated field produces the predicted deformation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a single topology optimization can jointly design the electrode layout and the electroactive polymer layout of a dielectric EAP actuator without prescribing either in advance. Using two density fields in a nested optimization, the method maximizes the displacement of an output port while constraining the volume of each material phase, solves the coupled nonlinear electro-mechanical equilibrium including the surrounding free space, and uses an adjoint sensitivity analysis to drive the design. In the demonstrated cases the optimizer spontaneously produces the classic sandwich arrangement: a thin curved EAP layer with stiffer electrode material on both sides, with electrode paths connected continuously from the corner sources to opposite sides of the layer and the electric potential gradient confined almost entirely to the EAP material. The authors report converged output displacements of -0.399 mm for vertical activation and -0.137 mm for horizontal activation in the two examples.

Load-bearing premise

The optimized designs are valid only if the electrode phase, modeled as a dielectric with a very large electrical coefficient and zero relative permittivity, behaves like a real conducting electrode, and if the truncated free-space domain is large enough that the far-field boundary does not constrain the field.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Actuator designs no longer need a predefined electrode pattern; the optimizer can route electrodes around arbitrary geometries as long as the electrical sources and the output port are specified.
  • The framework extends naturally to three dimensions because the discretization already uses 3D brick elements, with plane strain enforced by constraint.
  • The optimizer reproduces the traditional thin-EAP-layer-between-electrodes motif on its own, which makes the method a tool for exploring how topology and electrode routing shape actuator performance.
  • Because the electrode volume constraint is active, the optimized designs use the stiffer electrode material as structural reinforcement as well as conducting paths.
  • In the vertical-actuation case, extra EAP material is used only to stiffen the structure rather than to contribute deformation, showing that the optimizer can separate active from passive material.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test of the method is to replace the high-$c_e$ electrode proxy with a true conductor model; if the continuous-electrode motif disappears or the displacement changes substantially, the proxy is load-bearing.
  • The sign-symmetric EMI interpolation could be reused in other multi-physics topology optimization problems where intermediate densities need asymmetric penalization.
  • Because the free-space potential is computed over a graded truncated domain, the method could be extended to actuator arrays or to designs where fringing fields interact with external objects.
  • The unconstrained optimizer may produce very thin electrode details; adding a minimum feature-size or manufacturability constraint would be a practical next step.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a density-based multi-material topology optimization methodology for simultaneously designing electrode and electroactive polymer (EAP) layouts in dielectric EAP actuators. The method uses a non-linear electro-elastic formulation with a truncated extended free-space domain, a new exponential material interpolation (EMI) scheme for three-phase interpolation, PDE filtering and Heaviside projection, intermediate-density penalization, and MMA-based optimization. Two numerical examples maximize vertical and horizontal output displacements of an actuator suspended in free space. The optimized designs exhibit thin EAP layers with electrode material connecting the electrical sources to opposite sides of the EAP, concentrating the electric field in the EAP.

Significance. If the presented results are validated, the paper makes a useful contribution to topology optimization of electroactive structures. It addresses a relevant problem—simultaneous electrode and EAP layout design—and introduces an interpolation scheme (EMI) that appears to give distinct material phases in the examples. The paper is detailed in its parameter tables, algorithmic descriptions, and convergence histories, which supports reproducibility. The truncated free-space treatment and the multi-material formulation follow established literature, and the numerical demonstrations are plausible. However, the central physical claim—that the optimized electrode material is continuously connected and concentrates the field—rests on an unverified proxy model for the electrode, and important parts of the constitutive model are not fully specified. The lack of mesh-convergence and free-space-truncation studies further limits confidence in the reported designs.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.2 (after Eq. (6))] The paper states that the stabilized formulation of Ortigosa et al. [10] is used, 'which removes the dependency on the deformation gradient,' but the stabilized free energy and the corresponding constitutive expressions for D and T are never presented. Equations (4)–(6) describe the unstabilized model only, and Eq. (7) gives the void free energy. This is a load-bearing omission: the actual state problem is not specified, so the results cannot be reproduced and the numerical implementation is not transparent. Please write out the stabilized free energy and the resulting D and T, or explicitly state the specific equations from [10] (and [26]) that are adopted.
  2. [Section 3.2, Table 1, Eq. (5)] The electrode phase is modeled as a linear dielectric with εr=0 and ce=-0.5ε0·10^5, which yields D = ε0·10^5 E (effective relative permittivity 10^5), not as a conductor. The abstract and Section 4 claim that electrode material is 'continuously connected from the electrical sources to opposite sides of the EAP material' and thereby concentrates the electric field. This claim is only valid if the high-permittivity dielectric proxies an equipotential, conducting electrode with negligible potential drop. No potential-drop or conductivity check is reported, and the thin, elongated electrode paths in Figs. 5a and 6a make this assumption non-trivial. Please either (i) report the potential along the electrode paths (e.g., the potential at the far ends relative to the source potential) and demonstrate that the proxy is adequate, or (ii) replace the dielectric proxy with an explicit conducting model or conducting boundary conditions.
  3. [Section 4, Fig. 4, Eqs. (1c) and (2c)] The numerical examples rely on a truncated extended free-space domain with zero far-field potential and displacement, but no study of free-space truncation size or mesh convergence is reported. Given that the electric field extends beyond the design domain and that the optimizer can exploit the truncated domain (e.g., by placing high-field regions near the truncation boundary), the reported optimized designs and displacement values (g0 = −0.399 mm and −0.137 mm) may be sensitive to these numerical choices. Please include a brief convergence study (at least two additional domain sizes and one refined mesh) for at least one of the examples.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The sentence 'Numerical examples that demonstrates the method’s ability' contains a subject-verb agreement error; 'demonstrates' should be 'demonstrate'.
  2. [Section 3.2, Eq. (27)] The phrase 'in the void material and the two solid materials' is awkward; consider 'for the void material and the two solid materials'.
  3. [Section 4, Algorithm 1] The stopping criterion in Algorithm 1 uses the ratio |g0^k - g0^{k-1}| / |g0^k| > TOL, but the iteration index k is not defined in the surrounding text; please define it (e.g., as the outer iteration count).
  4. [Section 4, Eq. (33)] The choice of a1 = 10 and a2 = 10^7 is introduced without explanation; a short justification of this scaling and its effect on the MMA update would improve readability.
  5. [Section 4, Fig. 5b] The text says 'From 5b, it is obvious that the highest electric fields occur within or close to the design domain,' but the figure shows the field in the whole domain; consider adding a quantitative statement (e.g., field magnitude at the EAP vs. elsewhere) to support this observation.
  6. [Section 5] The conclusion mentions that 'Numerical test showed that common interpolation schemes were not able to create distinct material phases,' but the reader is not told which schemes were tested beyond DMO/UMI; a brief identification of the tested methods and their failure mode would be helpful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity; the electrode proxy is a validation risk, not a circular step.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained with respect to circularity. The constitutive parameters, filter widths, volume fractions, and EMI penalization parameters (Tables 1 and 2, Eqs. 25-27) are chosen algorithmic inputs; none is fitted to the optimized density fields, so no prediction is statistically forced by a fitted parameter. The central result—electrode material continuously connected from the electrical sources to opposite sides of the EAP and concentrating the electric field—is an output of the gradient-based optimization, not an input: the objective in (17) maximizes output displacement, and the adjoint sensitivities in (28)-(32) are derived from the stated state problem. The electrode phase is admittedly a proxy: 'To mimic the electrical conductivity of the electrode, a very large value of the ce parameter in (4) is used,' and from Table 1 with Eq. (5) the electrode behaves as a linear dielectric with D = eps0*10^5 E rather than as a true conductor. Whether such a proxy is electrically faithful along long, thin electrode paths, and whether the truncated free space with zero far-field conditions in (1c) and (2c) is large enough, are genuine modeling-validation questions, but they are not circularity. Self-citations such as Hård et al. [13], Ask et al. [4-6], and Granlund and Wallin [35] appear as background, constitutive-model references, or algorithmic regularization; the governing equations are stated explicitly in the paper, so the load-bearing argument does not reduce to an unverified self-citation. No uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work as a substitute for derivation. Score 1 reflects minor non-load-bearing self-citations only.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central method relies on standard continuum electromechanics plus several modeling proxies: a soft free-space domain, a high-permittivity electrode surrogate, and a stabilization scheme adopted from prior work. These are reasonable but not independently validated here. The many algorithmic tuning parameters, such as EMI exponents, continuation schedules, volume fractions, and spring stiffness, are inputs that could influence the optimized layouts.

free parameters (8)
  • EMI penalization exponents (q_m, q_mel, q_el) for density fields 1 and 2 = Initial: (1,2,2) and (-1,2,-2); final: (4,8,8) and (-4,8,-8)
    Table 2: chosen by hand with continuation; interpolation shape strongly affects whether distinct phases emerge.
  • Heaviside projection sharpness beta and threshold eta = beta: 1 to 20 by 20% increments every 10 iterations; eta=0.5
    Section 3.1 and 4: continuation schedule is an algorithmic choice.
  • Density penalization parameters alpha, delta, a_d = alpha: 0.9 down to 0.05; delta=1e-9; a_d=0 then |g0_hat|
    Eq. (23)-(24) and Section 4: tuned by continuation to remove intermediate densities.
  • PDE filter length scale l_i = 0.25 mm
    Section 4: controls minimum feature size; chosen by hand.
  • Volume fractions alpha1 and alpha2 = alpha1=0.2, alpha2=0.1
    Section 4: user-specified material budget constraints.
  • Objective scaling constants a1 and a2 = a1=10, a2=1e7
    Eq. (33): asinh scaling to improve MMA convergence; changes optimization path but not the optimum.
  • Electrode proxy permittivity ce = ce=-0.5*epsilon0*1e5 for electrode
    Table 1: high ce is chosen to mimic a conducting electrode; no justification of the specific value.
  • Output spring stiffness k_s = k_s=1e-3*d*G_EAP
    Section 4: arbitrary choice to simulate a load on the output port.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Truncated extended domain with zero far-field potential and zero far-field displacement approximates unbounded free space.
    Eqs. (1c) and (2c) in Section 2.1; no convergence study with respect to domain size is provided.
  • domain assumption Void and free space are modeled as a very soft hyperelastic material with vacuum permittivity and no electromechanical coupling.
    Eq. (7) and Table 1; adapted from Dev et al. [26].
  • ad hoc to paper High-ce, zero-epsilon_r dielectric behaves as a conducting electrode.
    Table 1 and Eq. (4)-(5); the electrode proxy is a numerical convenience without independent validation.
  • domain assumption Ortigosa et al. [10] stabilization removes the deformation-gradient dependence of the electromechanical term without altering physical predictions.
    Section 2.2, text after Eq. (6); the stabilization is adopted without derivation.
  • standard math Quasi-electrostatic Maxwell equations and the augmented free energy framework of Dorfmann and Ogden describe dielectric EAPs.
    Section 2; standard continuum electrostatics used throughout.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Electrode and electroactive polymer layout design using topology optimization." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FHEE74DE

@misc{pith2026241203256,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Electrode and electroactive polymer layout design using topology optimization},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FHEE74DE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.03256}
}
read the original abstract

When electrically stimulated, electroactive polymers (EAPs) respond with mechanical deformation. The goal of this work is to design electrode and EAP layouts simultaneously in structures by using density-based, multi-material topology optimization. In this novel approach the layout of electrodes and EAP material are not given a priori but is a result from the topology optimization. Material interpolation based on exponential functions is introduced, allowing a large flexibility to control the material interpolation. The electric field in the surrounding free space is modeled using a truncated extended domain method. Numerical examples that demonstrates the method's ability to design arbitrary EAP and electrode layouts are presented. In these optimized structures, electrode material is continuously connected from the electrical sources to opposite sides of the EAP material and thereby concentrating the electric field to the EAP material which drives the deformation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.03256 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A solid body B0 surrounded by a free space F0 in the material and spatial configura￾tions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The penalization function in (24) with example values on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The EMI interpolation in (26) with example values on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Illustration of the geometry and boundary conditions for the actuator with thickness [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Optimized design for maximizing vertical displacement [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Optimized design for maximizing horizontal displacement [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [10]

    Density-based topology optimisation considering nonlinear electromechan- ics

    Ortigosa, R., Martínez-Frutos, J., Ruiz, D., Donoso, A., and Bellido, J. C. “Density-based topology optimisation considering nonlinear electromechan- ics”. en. In: Struct Multidisc Optim 64.1 (July 2021), pp. 257–280. issn: 1615-1488. doi: 10.1007/s00158-021-02886-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s00158-021-02886-3 2021

  2. [26]

    On the influence of free space in topology optimization of electro-active polymers

    Dev, C., Stankiewicz, G., and Steinmann, P. “On the influence of free space in topology optimization of electro-active polymers”. en. In:Struct Multidisc Optim 66.8(Aug.2023),p.187. issn:1615-1488. doi: 10.1007/s00158-023- 03634-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s00158-023- 2023

  3. [1]

    Electroactive polymer (EAP) actuators as artificial mus- cles: reality, potential, and challenges

    Bar-Cohen, Y., ed. Electroactive polymer (EAP) actuators as artificial mus- cles: reality, potential, and challenges. 2nd ed. Bellingham, Wash: SPIE Press, 2004. isbn: 978-0-8194-5297-9

    work page 2004

  4. [2]

    Electroactive polymer (EAP) actua- tors—background review

    Bar-Cohen, Y. and Anderson, I. A. “Electroactive polymer (EAP) actua- tors—background review”. en. In:Mech Soft Mater 1.1 (Mar. 2019), p. 5. issn: 2524-5619. doi: 10.1007/s42558-019-0005-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s42558-019-0005-1 2019

  5. [3]

    Nonlinear electroelasticity

    Dorfmann, A. and Ogden, R. W. “Nonlinear electroelasticity”. en. In:Acta Mechanica 174.3 (Mar. 2005), pp. 167–183.issn: 1619-6937. doi: 10.1007/ s00707-004-0202-2

    work page 2005

  6. [4]

    Phenomenological modeling of vis- cous electrostrictive polymers

    Ask, A., Menzel, A., and Ristinmaa, M. “Phenomenological modeling of vis- cous electrostrictive polymers”. en. In:International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics. Nonlinear Continuum Theories 47.2 (Mar. 2012), pp. 156–165. issn: 0020-7462. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2011.03.020

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2011.03.020 2012

  7. [5]

    Electrostrictioninelectro-viscoelastic polymers

    Ask,A.,Menzel,A.,andRistinmaa,M.“Electrostrictioninelectro-viscoelastic polymers”. en. In: Mechanics of Materials 50 (July 2012), pp. 9–21. issn: 0167-6636. doi: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2012.01.009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mechmat.2012.01.009 2012

  8. [6]

    Modelling of Viscoelastic Dielectric Elastomers with Deformation Dependent Electric Properties

    Ask, A., Menzel, A., and Ristinmaa, M. “Modelling of Viscoelastic Dielectric Elastomers with Deformation Dependent Electric Properties”. en. In:Proce- dia IUTAM. IUTAM Symposium on Mechanics of Soft Active Materials 12 (Jan. 2015), pp. 134–144.issn: 2210-9838. doi: 10.1016/j.piutam.2014. 12.015. 19

    work page doi:10.1016/j.piutam.2014 2015

Show all 37 references
  1. [7]

    A new framework for large strain electromechan- ics based on convex multi-variable strain energies: Finite Element discretisa- tion and computational implementation

    Ortigosa, R. and Gil, A. J. “A new framework for large strain electromechan- ics based on convex multi-variable strain energies: Finite Element discretisa- tion and computational implementation”. In:Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering302 (Apr. 2016), pp. 329–...

    2016 doi

  2. [8]

    Topology optimization of dielectric elastomers for wide tunable band gaps

    Bortot, E., Amir, O., and Shmuel, G. “Topology optimization of dielectric elastomers for wide tunable band gaps”. en. In: International Journal of Solids and Structures143 (June 2018), pp. 262–273.issn: 0020-7683. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.03.014

    2018 doi

  3. [9]

    Gradient-based topol- ogy optimization of soft dielectrics as tunable phononic crystals

    Sharma, A. K., Kosta, M., Shmuel, G., and Amir, O. “Gradient-based topol- ogy optimization of soft dielectrics as tunable phononic crystals”. en. In: Composite Structures280 (Jan. 2022), p. 114846.issn: 0263-8223. doi: 10. 1016/j.compstruct.2021.114846

    2022

  4. [11]

    Multi-resolutionmethodsforthetopol- ogy optimization of nonlinear electro-active polymers at large strains

    Ortigosa,R.andMartínez-Frutos,J.“Multi-resolutionmethodsforthetopol- ogy optimization of nonlinear electro-active polymers at large strains”. en. In: Comput Mech68.2 (Aug. 2021), pp. 271–293.issn: 1432-0924. doi: 10. 1007/s00466-021-02030-4

    2021

  5. [12]

    In-silico design of electrode meso-architecture for shape morphing dielectric elastomers

    Martínez-Frutos, J., Ortigosa, R., and Gil, A. J. “In-silico design of electrode meso-architecture for shape morphing dielectric elastomers”. en. In:Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids157 (Dec. 2021), p. 104594. issn: 0022-5096. doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2021.104594

    2021

  6. [13]

    ConnectivityConstraintsEnsuring Continuous Electrodes in Topology Optimization of Electroactive Polymer

    Hård,D.,Wallin,M.,andRistinmaa,M.“ConnectivityConstraintsEnsuring Continuous Electrodes in Topology Optimization of Electroactive Polymer”. In: Journal of Mechanical Design146.101707 (Apr. 2024).issn: 1050-0472. doi: 10.1115/1.4064980

    2024 doi

  7. [14]

    Material interpolation schemes in topol- ogy optimization

    Bendsøe, M. P. and Sigmund, O. “Material interpolation schemes in topol- ogy optimization”. en. In:Archive of Applied Mechanics69.9 (Nov. 1999), pp. 635–654. issn: 1432-0681. doi: 10.1007/s004190050248

    1999 doi

  8. [15]

    Discrete material optimization of general com- posite shell structures

    Stegmann, J. and Lund, E. “Discrete material optimization of general com- posite shell structures”. en. In:International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering62.14 (2005), pp. 2009–2027.issn: 1097-0207.doi: 10.1002/ nme.1259. 20

    2005

  9. [16]

    A uni- fied material interpolation for topology optimization of multi-materials

    Yi, B., Yoon, G. H., Zheng, R., Liu, L., Li, D., and Peng, X. “A uni- fied material interpolation for topology optimization of multi-materials”. In: Computers & Structures282 (July 2023), p. 107041.issn: 0045-7949. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2023.107041

    2023

  10. [17]

    Topology optimization of compliant mechanisms under transient thermal conditions

    Granlund, G., Wallin, M., Günther-Hanssen, O., Tortorelli, D., and Watts, S. “Topology optimization of compliant mechanisms under transient thermal conditions”. In: Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 418 (Jan. 2024), p. 116478.issn: 0045-7825. doi: 10.1016/j...

    2024 doi

  11. [18]

    Multi-material topology optimization of piezoelectric composite structures for energy harvesting

    He, M., Zhang, X., Santos Fernandez, L. dos, Molter, A., Xia, L., and Shi, T. “Multi-material topology optimization of piezoelectric composite structures for energy harvesting”. In:Composite Structures265 (June 2021), p. 113783. issn: 0263-8223. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113783

    2021

  12. [19]

    Integrated multi- material and multi-scale optimization of compliant structure with embed- ded movable piezoelectric actuators

    Hu, J., Wallin, M., Ristinmaa, M., Liu, Y., and Liu, S. “Integrated multi- material and multi-scale optimization of compliant structure with embed- ded movable piezoelectric actuators”. In:Computer Methods in Applied Me- chanics and Engineering421 (Mar. 2024), p. 116786.issn: ...

    2024

  13. [20]

    Topology optimiza- tion of smart structures with embedded piezoelectric stack actuators using a composite geometry projection method

    Almeida, B. V. de, Pavanello, R., and Langelaar, M. “Topology optimiza- tion of smart structures with embedded piezoelectric stack actuators using a composite geometry projection method”. In:Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 429 (Sept. 2024), p. 117120. iss...

    2024

  14. [21]

    Programmingshape-morphing electroactive polymers through multi-material topology optimisation

    Ortigosa,R.,Martínez-Frutos,J.,andGil,A.J.“Programmingshape-morphing electroactive polymers through multi-material topology optimisation”. en. In: Applied Mathematical Modelling 118 (June 2023), pp. 346–369. issn: 0307-904X. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2023.01.041

    2023 doi

  15. [22]

    A review of finite element open boundary tech- niques for static and quasi-static electromagnetic field problems

    Chen, Q. and Konrad, A. “A review of finite element open boundary tech- niques for static and quasi-static electromagnetic field problems”. In:IEEE Transactions on Magnetics33.1 (Jan. 1997). Conference Name: IEEE Trans- actions on Magnetics, pp. 663–676. issn: 1941-0069. doi: ...

    1997

  16. [23]

    A 2-D coupled BEM–FEM simulation of electro-elastostatics at large strain

    Vu, D. K. and Steinmann, P. “A 2-D coupled BEM–FEM simulation of electro-elastostatics at large strain”. In:Computer Methods in Applied Me- chanics and Engineering199.17(Mar.2010),pp.1124–1133. issn:0045-7825. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2009.12.001. 21

    2010 doi

  17. [24]

    On 3-D coupled BEM–FEM simulation of nonlinear electro-elastostatics

    Vu, D. K. and Steinmann, P. “On 3-D coupled BEM–FEM simulation of nonlinear electro-elastostatics”. In:Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering201-204 (Jan. 2012), pp. 82–90.issn: 0045-7825. doi: 10. 1016/j.cma.2011.08.024

    2012

  18. [25]

    Computationalelectro-elasticityandmagneto-elasticityforquasi-incompressible media immersed in free space

    Pelteret, J.-P., Davydov, D., McBride, A., Vu, D. K., and Steinmann, P. “Computationalelectro-elasticityandmagneto-elasticityforquasi-incompressible media immersed in free space”. en. In:International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering108.11 (2016), pp. 1307–1342.iss...

    2016 doi

  19. [27]

    Jackson, J. D. Classical electrodynamics. eng. New York: Wiley, 1962.isbn: 978-0-471-43131-2

    1962

  20. [28]

    Eringen, A. C. and Maugin, G. A. Electrodynamics of continua. 1: Foun- dations and solid media. eng. New York Heidelberg: Springer, 1990.isbn: 978-1-4612-7923-5 978-0-387-96936-7 978-3-540-96936-5

    1990

  21. [29]

    Electromagnetic theory

    Kovetz, A. Electromagnetic theory. Oxford science publications. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.isbn: 978-0-19-850604-1 978-0-19- 850603-4

    2000

  22. [30]

    Interpolation scheme for fictitious domain techniques and topology optimization of finite strain elastic problems

    Wang, F., Lazarov, B. S., Sigmund, O., and Jensen, J. S. “Interpolation scheme for fictitious domain techniques and topology optimization of finite strain elastic problems”. In:Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 276 (July 2014), pp. 453–472.issn: 0045-7825. ...

    2014

  23. [31]

    Filters in topology optimization based on Helmholtz-type differential equations

    Lazarov, B. S. and Sigmund, O. “Filters in topology optimization based on Helmholtz-type differential equations”. en. In:International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering86.6(2011),pp.765–781. issn:1097-0207. doi: 10.1002/nme.3072

    2011 doi

  24. [32]

    Consistent boundary conditions for PDE filter regularization in topology optimization

    Wallin, M., Ivarsson, N., Amir, O., and Tortorelli, D. “Consistent boundary conditions for PDE filter regularization in topology optimization”. en. In: Struct Multidisc Optim 62.3 (Sept. 2020), pp. 1299–1311.issn: 1615-1488. doi: 10.1007/s00158-020-02556-w

    2020 doi

  25. [33]

    On projection methods, con- vergence and robust formulations in topology optimization

    Wang, F., Lazarov, B. S., and Sigmund, O. “On projection methods, con- vergence and robust formulations in topology optimization”. en. In:Struct Multidisc Optim 43.6 (June 2011), pp. 767–784.issn: 1615-1488. doi: 10. 1007/s00158-010-0602-y. 22

    2011

  26. [34]

    Inverse design of periodic microstructures with targeted nonlinear mechanical behaviour

    Thillaithevan, D., Murphy, R., Hewson, R., and Santer, M. “Inverse design of periodic microstructures with targeted nonlinear mechanical behaviour”. en. In:Struct Multidisc Optim67.4 (Mar. 2024), p. 55.issn: 1615-1488.doi: 10.1007/s00158-024-03761-7

    2024 doi

  27. [35]

    Large-scale elasto-plastic topology optimiza- tion

    Granlund, G. and Wallin, M. “Large-scale elasto-plastic topology optimiza- tion”. en. In:International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering n/a.n/a (Aug. 2024), e7583.issn: 1097-0207. doi: 10.1002/nme.7583

    2024 doi

  28. [36]

    Plate/shell topological optimization subjected to linear buckling constraints by adopting composite exponential filtering function

    Ye, H.-L., Wang, W.-W., Chen, N., and Sui, Y.-K. “Plate/shell topological optimization subjected to linear buckling constraints by adopting composite exponential filtering function”. en. In: Acta Mech. Sin. 32.4 (Aug. 2016), pp. 649–658. issn: 1614-3116. doi: 10.1007/s10409-015-0531-5

    2016 doi

  29. [37]

    The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for struc- tural optimization

    Svanberg, K. “The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for struc- tural optimization”. en. In:International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 24.2 (1987), pp. 359–373.issn: 1097-0207. doi: 10.1002/nme. 1620240207. 23

    1987 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.