Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Submillimeter observations of the white dwarf pulsar AR Sco

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read New submillimeter data show that AR Sco's white dwarf has a weak ~15 MG magnetic field, not the ~500 MG field inferred from spin-down, so the star did not undergo crystallization.

desk verdict New SMA data and a credible spin-harmonic detection, but the ~15 MG weak-field conclusion is undermined by circularity and internal contradictions. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.06468 v1 pith:FIHTVAEK submitted 2025-05-09 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.HE

Paul E. Barrett , Mark A. Gurwell This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.HE
keywords ARScorpiiwhitedwarfpulsarsubmillimeterastronomysynchrotronemissionmagneticintermediatepolarcataclysmicvariablesspectralenergydistribution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first submillimeter observations of the white dwarf pulsar AR Sco, at 220 and 345 GHz with the Submillimeter Array. The measured fluxes (124 and 86 mJy) reveal a spectral break near 200 GHz, and a periodogram of the 220 GHz light curve shows a ~6% modulation at 58.26 s, twice the white dwarf's spin period, the first direct detection of the spin period at radio frequencies. Fitting the spectral energy distribution with a fast-cooling synchrotron model gives an emission-region magnetic field of about 43 G in a compact region about 0.6 orbital radii from the white dwarf. Combined with a 4 kG dipole field for the red dwarf, this implies a white dwarf polar field of roughly 15 MG. The authors conclude that AR Sco hosts a weakly magnetic white dwarf, contradicting the ~500 MG field inferred from spin-down and the claim that the white dwarf underwent a crystallization-induced dynamo.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing identity is the dipole field fall-off used twice: the MCMC-fitted synchrotron emission-region field of $B \approx 43$ G is first interpreted as a $4$ kG red-dwarf dipole at a distance of about $1.4$ orbital radii from the red dwarf (equivalently about $0.6$ orbital radii from the white dwarf), and the same field is then treated as the white dwarf's dipole at that location to infer a polar field of roughly $15$ MG through $B_{\rm pol} = B (r / R_{\rm WD})^3$. The argument is carried by the fast-cooling thin-shell forward shock synchrotron model, parameterized by the break frequencies $\nu_a$, $\nu_c$, $\nu_m$, the electron density and power-law index $n_e$ and $p$, the magnetic field $B$, and the region size and thickness $R$ and $L$, fit to the radio-to-optical SED with MCMC. The new detection of a modulation at $58.26$ s, twice the white dwarf spin period, ties the submillimeter emission to the white dwarf's rotating dipole field.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of the white dwarf's surface field by Zeeman spectropolarimetry of its photospheric lines would settle this: a detected field near 500 MG (or even substantially above ~100 MG) would refute the weak-field claim, while a field near ~15 MG would confirm it. A full-orbit, ~1 s cadence submillimeter campaign that maps the pulse phase could independently locate the synchrotron region and test the assumed 0.6 orbital radii position.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the white dwarf in AR Sco has a magnetic field of order 15 MG at its pole, comparable to intermediate polar white dwarfs, rather than the roughly 500 MG field previously inferred from the spin-down rate under the magnetic-dipole-radiation assumption. The evidence chain runs through the new submillimeter data: the 220 GHz flux is modulated at twice the spin period (58.26 s), placing the synchrotron source near the white dwarf; the spectral break at about 200 GHz and the overall SED are best matched by a fast-cooling synchrotron model with a magnetic field of ~43 G in a small emitting region with size ~3.8e7 cm and electron density ~5.3e8 $cm^{-3}$; and, under the assumption that the red dwarf has a 4 kG dipole field, that 43 G places the source at ~0.6 orbital radii from the white dwarf, which in turn yields a polar field of ~15 MG for the white dwarf. If correct, this would rule out the crystallization scenario for AR Sco's magnetism and require a non-dipole mechanism for the observed spin-down.

Load-bearing premise

The inference of a ~15 MG polar field rests on using the same MCMC-fitted 43 G field twice: once as a 4 kG red-dwarf dipole at about 1.4 orbital radii from the red dwarf to locate the source, and once as the white dwarf's dipole at that location; if the field is not a simple dipole or the source is elsewhere, the 15 MG value dissolves.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the white dwarf is only weakly magnetic at ~15 MG, then the observed spin-down cannot be powered by magnetic dipole radiation, and an alternative mechanism such as a particle wind or magnetic reconnection must supply the spin-down torque.
  • The modulation at twice the spin period in the submillimeter shows that the synchrotron source is coupled to the white dwarf's rotating dipole field, not to the red dwarf's photosphere, which guides future models of the system's pulsed emission.
  • The spectral break near 200 GHz, interpreted as partial absorption or fast cooling in a compact synchrotron region, predicts that at lower frequencies the spectrum should steepen again, which can be tested with broadband radio observations.
  • If AR Sco's white dwarf did not undergo crystallization, then the crystallization-driven dynamo scenario loses one of its key examples, and the incidence of strongly magnetic white dwarfs in cataclysmic variables must be explained by other channels.
  • The inferred field places AR Sco in the intermediate polar (IP) class, suggesting that the system may be an IP whose accretion has temporarily ceased; this would link the white dwarf pulsar phenomenon to the usual magnetic CV population.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The double use of the same 43 G field as both the red dwarf's and the white dwarf's dipole is a fragile step; independent localization of the emission region, for example via submillimeter very long baseline interferometry or orbital-phase-dependent pulse timing, would provide a decisive test of the 15 MG inference.
  • If the weak-field conclusion holds, the spin-down luminosity must be produced by something other than low-order magnetic dipole radiation, which would make AR Sco a natural laboratory for studying pulsar-like magnetospheric activity around white dwarfs.
  • The detection of the spin harmonic at submillimeter wavelengths suggests that high-frequency observations could serve as a direct probe of white dwarf rotation in other close binaries, even where optical pulsations are masked by the companion.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports the first submillimeter observations of the white dwarf pulsar AR Sco with the Submillimeter Array at 220 GHz and 345 GHz. It derives average flux densities of 124 and 86 mJy, respectively, and finds a ~6% modulation at 58.64 s in the 220 GHz light curve, which it attributes to the second harmonic of the white dwarf spin period. The paper constructs a multi-component SED including a synchrotron model and, using a Markov-chain Monte Carlo fit, obtains an emission-region magnetic field of ~43 G. From this value, combined with assumed dipole fields for the red dwarf and white dwarf, it infers that the emission region lies 0.6 orbital radii from the white dwarf and that the white dwarf polar field is ~15 MG, concluding that AR Sco has not undergone a crystallization-driven magnetic field amplification.

Significance. The new SMA flux measurements and the detection of a modulation at twice the white dwarf spin period are potentially valuable additions to the observational picture of AR Sco. The claimed implication, that the white dwarf field is weak (~15 MG) rather than strong (~500 MG), would challenge the crystallization scenario for magnetic white dwarf formation. However, the field inference rests on a chain of assumptions that are internally inconsistent; the observational data alone do not support the headline conclusion. If the field claim is removed, the paper remains a modest but useful observational report, but its present significance is dominated by an unsupported astrophysical interpretation.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.1 and Table 3] The spectral indices quoted in §3.1 are inconsistent with the fluxes listed in Table 3. From the 22 GHz flux of 22±1 mJy and the 220 GHz flux of 124±10 mJy, the spectral index is α = log(124/22)/log(10) ≈ 0.75±0.04, not 0.515±0.015 as stated. Similarly, using the 220 GHz and 345 GHz fluxes gives α ≈ −0.8, not −0.3±0.1. These discrepancies affect the reported break at ~220 GHz and the subsequent SED modeling, so they must be resolved.
  2. [§4.4] The derivation of the 15 MG white dwarf polar field is circular and numerically inconsistent. The same fitted value B≈43 G is used first to locate the emission region by equating it to the red dwarf dipole field, and second to infer the white dwarf polar field at that location. With the paper's own midpoint calibration (B_RD≈114 G at 0.5 orbital separation from the red dwarf, implying (R_RD/a)^3 ≈ 0.0285), the red dwarf dipole at 0.4 a from the red dwarf (i.e., 0.6 a from the white dwarf) is ≈223 G, not 43 G. Conversely, solving B_RD(r)=43 G gives r≈0.69 a from the red dwarf, placing the source only 0.31 a from the white dwarf, which would change the derived polar field by an order of magnitude. The phrase "distance of ≈1.4 orbital radii from the RD" also conflicts with "0.6 orbital radii from the WD," since the two distances must sum to the binary separation. The 15 MG conclusion is therefore unsupported.
  3. [Abstract and §4.4] The abstract states that the synchrotron emission region has a "magnetic field of 43 MG," while the text and Table 2 report B = 42.7±0.2 G. This factor-of-10^6 discrepancy appears in the central quantity of the paper and must be corrected; as printed, the abstract contradicts the derived conclusion of a ~15 MG white dwarf field.
  4. [§4.4] Even setting aside the numerical inconsistency, the conversion from B≈43 G to a white dwarf polar field requires an independent determination of the source location. The paper itself acknowledges that the fitted emission-region size of ~10^7 cm (≈0.1% of the orbital radius) provides little constraint on location. The detection of modulation at twice the spin period indicates that the emission arises near the white dwarf, but it does not fix the radial distance from the white dwarf. Without such an independent distance, the polar field is degenerate with the assumed geometry, and the claim that AR Sco has not undergone crystallization is not established.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase "and and" contains a duplicated word; also "a distance of 0.6 orbital radii from the WD" is ambiguous without specifying the reference point for the first distance.
  2. [§3.2] The figure references appear as "Fig. 3.2" and "Figure 3.2" in the text; these should be replaced with proper figure numbers.
  3. [§4.4] The sentence "The bulk motion of the medium Γ 2 is assume to be non-cosmological" contains a typo ("assume") and a formatting issue with the superscript; it should read "Γ² is assumed."
  4. [§4.4] The fit uses a 22 GHz flux from an unpublished VLA observation ("Barrett, private communication"); this is a key constraint on the spectral shape and should be published or made available for independent verification.
  5. [Table 2] The quoted uncertainties are Markov chain standard errors (MCSE) only; systematic uncertainties from the fixed parameters (νa, νm, p) and from the assumed geometry are not propagated, so the errors on B and the derived field strength are likely underestimated.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The 15 MG weak-field conclusion reuses the single fitted 43 G emission-region field to set both the source location and the WD polar field, making the result a rearrangement of the fit.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 4.4, 'The Synchrotron Component']
    "The magnetic field estimate from the MCMC result indicates that the synchrotron emission region is even further from the RD at a distance of≈1.4 orbital radii or at a distance of 0.6 orbital radii from the WD."

    The distance is not an independent observable: the same fit gives an emission size of only ~10^7 cm, which the paper itself says is ~0.1% of the orbital radius and 'provides little constraint on its location between the two stars.' The quoted distance is instead solved by equating the fitted B≈43 G to the assumed 4 kG dipolar field of the RD. Thus the source location is constructed from the fitted parameter, and the later WD polar-field estimate inherits that fit without adding information.

  2. self definitional [Section 4.4, immediately following the location inference]
    "At this distance the polar field strength of the WD is ≈15 MG, similar to the field strength of the intermediate polar (IP) subclass of magnetic CVs."

    The same fitted B≈43 G is first used to set the source distance through the RD dipole (4 kG at the surface) and then reinterpreted as the WD dipole field at that distance. The 15 MG value is therefore the fitted parameter scaled by an assumed geometry, not an independent estimate. The location is also internally inconsistent: at the claimed position 0.6 orbital radii from the WD (0.4 from the RD), the paper's own midpoint calibration of 114 G at 0.5 orbital radii gives B_RD≈114*(0.5/0.4)^3≈223 G, not the 43 G used to obtain that position. With no independent position constraint, the WD polar field is undetermined.

full rationale

The paper contains genuinely new, non-circular observational results: first SMA submillimeter fluxes at 220 and 345 GHz, a spectral break near 200 GHz, and detection of twice the WD spin period at 220 GHz. These data and the periodogram analysis are self-contained. The circularity is confined to the central physical conclusion. The 43 G emission-region field is a fitted MCMC parameter, and the claimed 15 MG WD polar field is obtained by using that same fitted value twice: once to place the source by matching the assumed 4 kG RD dipole, and once as the WD dipole at that resulting location. Because the fitted emission region is far smaller than the orbit and provides no position, the entire chain reduces to algebra on a single fitted number under an assumed dipole geometry. The internal inconsistency between 223 G and 43 G at the claimed location confirms that the location and field are not independently constrained. The HST upper limit of 100 MG cited for consistency is an independent but loose constraint; it does not rescue the specific 15 MG derivation. Overall the paper is only partially circular, since the observational core stands alone, but the headline weak-field/crystallization conclusion reduces by construction from the fit.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central inference of a 15 MG white dwarf field rests on a seven-parameter synchrotron fit, a dipole geometry whose source distance is derived from the fitted field itself, and an unpublished 22 GHz anchor. The observations themselves are new and likely real, but the interpretive chain is heavily parameterized.

free parameters (8)
  • Emission-region magnetic field B = 42.7 +/- 0.2 G
    Free parameter in the synchrotron SED model, from MCMC posterior in Table 2. The abstract's '43 MG' is a units typo.
  • Electron density n_e = 5.34e8 cm^-3
    Fitted in MCMC; controls self-absorption and spectral normalization.
  • Emission region size R = 3.786e7 cm
    Fitted in MCMC; enters the synchrotron luminosity and self-absorption formulas.
  • Absorbing layer thickness L = 4.61e5 cm
    Fitted in MCMC; controls the absorption optical depth in the model.
  • Cooling frequency nu_c = 6.4e9 Hz
    Fitted in MCMC; sets the spectral break between fast and slow cooling regimes.
  • Electron power-law index p = 1.1
    Adjusted by eye and then held fixed in the MCMC; determines the high-frequency spectral slope.
  • Minimum electron Lorentz factor gamma_e = 10.2
    Initially assumed to be about 10, then included in the MCMC; sets the characteristic synchrotron frequency.
  • Source location, 0.6 orbital radii from WD = 0.6 a (derived)
    Not measured; inferred by equating the fitted 43 G field to a 4 kG red dwarf dipole at 1.4 orbital radii, then reused to compute the white dwarf polar field.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption AR Sco's non-thermal spectrum follows the GRB thin-shell forward shock synchrotron model with fast or slow cooling.
    Borrowed from GRB literature and applied to a white dwarf binary without independent justification; invoked in section 4.3.
  • ad hoc to paper The magnetic field in the emission region is dominated by a single stellar dipole at a distance fixed by the red dwarf dipole.
    Used in section 4.4 to locate the emission region and to convert the fitted 43 G field into a 15 MG white dwarf polar field; the same measured field is used twice.
  • domain assumption The spectral steepening near 200 GHz is due to synchrotron self-absorption, not source variability.
    Assumed in sections 4.1 and 4.3; the 220 and 345 GHz data were taken on different dates, and AR Sco is known to vary on orbital and beat periods.
  • domain assumption The 220 GHz modulation at 58.6 s is the second harmonic of the white dwarf spin, not the beat frequency.
    Supported by the periodogram, where the signal differs from the beat frequency by more than 5 sigma, but the inference that the emission is therefore in the white dwarf magnetosphere assumes a specific beaming geometry, as discussed in section 3.2.
  • domain assumption The accepted binary separation and stellar radii from prior literature are correct.
    The 0.6 orbital radii distance and the dipole scaling convert to linear distance only with accepted system parameters, which are not rederived in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Submillimeter observations of the white dwarf pulsar AR Sco." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FIHTVAEK

@misc{pith2026250506468,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Submillimeter observations of the white dwarf pulsar AR Sco},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FIHTVAEK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.06468}
}
read the original abstract

AR Scorpii, the so called white dwarf pulsar, contains a rapidly rotating magnetic white dwarf (WD; Pspin = 117.0564 s) interacting with a cool, red dwarf (RD) companion in a 3.56 hour orbit. It is a strong radio source with an inverted spectral index between 1-200 GHz that is indicative of synchrotron emission. This paper presents the first submillimeter observations of AR Scorpii using the Submillimeter Array, helping to fill a critical gap in the spectral energy distribution between 10-600 GHz. The average flux densities at 220 and 345 GHz are 124 and 86 mJy, respectively. The lower than expected flux density at 345 GHz suggests a break in the synchrotron emission at about 200 GHz. A periodogram analysis of the 220 GHz observations shows a modulation with an amplitude of ~6% at a period of 58.26 s or at twice the spin frequency of the white dwarf. This modulation is the first direct detection of the WD spin period at radio frequencies and implies that the synchrotron emission arises near the WD and and not from an interaction with the photosphere of the RD. A fit to the spectral energy distribution shows that the synchrotron emission arises from a small, low density region with a magnetic field of 43 MG at a distance of 0.6 orbital radii from the WD. This result implies that AR Scorpii contains a weakly magnetic WD (~15 MG) and not a strongly magnetic WD (~500 MG) as previously asserted.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.06468 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Periodogram of AR Sco photometry at 220 GHz. The signal at 17.053±0.023 mHz with an amplitude of ≈ 6% is identified as the second harmonic of the spin period (117.12 s). The dashed vertical line is the frequency of twice the spin period and the dotted vertical line is that of twice the beat period. The difference is > 5σ. Most amplitudes are < 3 mJy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Spin folded light curve of AR Sco at 220 GHz. a few THz, while the second spectral break occurs in the γ-ray band at a few tens of MeV. The model is a reasonable fit to the spectrum above the peak emission (i.e., from the infrared to X-rays), but it overestimates the observed spectrum below the peak by an order of magnitude or more because the spectral index α = 1/3 is too flat for the observed spectrum. Although th… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Spectral energy distribution (SED) of AR Sco. The black points and lines are data from Marsh et al. (2016) and Takata et al. (2018). The three red points are the 22 GHz (VLA) plus 220 and 345 GHz (SMA) observations. The magenta, red, and blue curves are respectively the blackbody emissions from the cool circumbinary dust cloud (70 K), the red dwarf companion (3100 K), and the white dwarf primary (9750 K). The dashed… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Sibling of AR Scorpii: SDSS J230641.47$+$244055.8 and the Observational Blueprint of White Dwarf Pulsars

    astro-ph.SR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SDSS J230641.47+244055.8 is a newly identified white dwarf pulsar with a 92-second spin period and a 3.49-hour orbit, making it the third known member of this rare class.

  2. Low-frequency observations of low-mass binary systems with neutron star candidates

    astro-ph.HE 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A 111 MHz archival search finds no periodic radio emission from five compact-object binaries and one ambiguous 13 Jy, 0.13 s burst toward J1527+3536.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

22 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Singh, K. P. 2020, Advances in Space Research, 66, 1226, doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2020.04.007

    doi:10.1016/j.asr.2020.04.007 2020

  2. [2]

    E., & Chanmugam, G

    Barrett, P. E., & Chanmugam, G. 1984, ApJ, 278, 298, doi: 10.1086/161794

    work page doi:10.1086/161794 1984

  3. [3]

    Mason, P. A. 2017, AJ, 154, 252, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa93ff

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa93ff 2017

  4. [4]

    2021, MNRAS, 506, 4275, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1936

    Birenbaum, G., & Bromberg, O. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 4275, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1936

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1936 2021

  5. [5]

    Bretthorst, G. L. 1988, Bayesian Spectrum Analysis and Parameter Estimation (Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg). http://bayes.wustl.edu/glb/book.pdf

    work page 1988

  6. [6]

    Browning, M. K. 2008, ApJ, 676, 1262, doi: 10.1086/527432

    doi:10.1086/527432 2008

  7. [7]

    Buckley, D. A. H., Meintjes, P. J., Potter, S. B., Marsh, T. R., & G¨ ansicke, B. T. 2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 0029, doi: 10.1038/s41550-016-0029

    doi:10.1038/s41550-016-0029 2017

  8. [8]

    M., Littlefield, C., Potter, S

    Gaibor, Y., Garnavich, P. M., Littlefield, C., Potter, S. B., & Buckley, D. A. H. 2020, MNRAS, 496, 4849, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1901

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1901 2020

Show all 22 references
  1. [9]

    2013, NewAR, 57, 141, doi: 10.1016/j.newar.2013.10.001

    Gao, H., Lei, W.-H., Zou, Y.-C., Wu, X.-F., & Zhang, B. 2013, NewAR, 57, 141, doi: 10.1016/j.newar.2013.10.001

    2013 doi

  2. [10]

    2021, ApJ, 908, 195, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abd4db

    Garnavich, P., Littlefield, C., Lyutikov, M., & Barkov, M. 2021, ApJ, 908, 195, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abd4db

    2021 doi

  3. [11]

    2016, ApJL, 831, L10, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/831/1/L10 K¨ uker, M., & R¨ udiger, G

    Geng, J.-J., Zhang, B., & Huang, Y.-F. 2016, ApJL, 831, L10, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/831/1/L10 K¨ uker, M., & R¨ udiger, G. 1999, A&A, 346, 922

    2016 doi

  4. [12]

    2017, ApJL, 845, L7, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa8300

    Littlefield, C., Garnavich, P., Kennedy, M., et al. 2017, ApJL, 845, L7, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa8300

    2017 doi

  5. [13]

    Blanchard, J. M. 2017, A&A, 601, L7, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730948

    2017 doi

  6. [14]

    R., G¨ ansicke, B

    Marsh, T. R., G¨ ansicke, B. T., H¨ ummerich, S., et al. 2016, Nature, 537, 374, doi: 10.1038/nature18620

    2016 doi

  7. [15]

    R., Parsons, S

    Pelisoli, I., Marsh, T. R., Parsons, S. G., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 5052, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2391

    2022 doi

  8. [16]

    B., & Lightman, A

    Rybicki, G. B., & Lightman, A. P. 1986, Radiative Processes in Astrophysics

    1986

  9. [17]

    N., & Beasley, A

    Sanderson, K. N., & Beasley, A. 2019, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 233, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #233, 348.09

    2019

  10. [18]

    R., Belloni, D., G¨ ansicke, B

    Schreiber, M. R., Belloni, D., G¨ ansicke, B. T., Parsons, S. G., & Zorotovic, M. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 648, doi: 10.1038/s41550-021-01346-8

    2021 doi

  11. [19]

    R., Marsh, T

    Stanway, E. R., Marsh, T. R., Chote, P., et al. 2018, A&A, 611, A66, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201732380

    2018 doi

  12. [20]

    P., Lin, L

    Takata, J., Hu, C. P., Lin, L. C. C., et al. 2018, ApJ, 853, 106, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa23d

    2018 doi

  13. [21]

    Takata, J., Yang, H., & Cheng, K. S. 2017, ApJ, 851, 143, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9b33

    2017 doi

  14. [22]

    Wells, D. C. 1985, in Data Analysis in Astronomy, ed. V. di

    1985

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.