pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.18016 · v2 · pith:FKCDPNY7new · submitted 2026-04-20 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · cond-mat.other

Superfluid ³He aerogel experiments as a laboratory neutron star analogue

Samuli Autti , Vanessa Graber , Brynmor Haskell This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 06:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE cond-mat.other
keywords superfluid vorticesaerogelneutron starsvortex pinningglitcheshelium-3point-vortex simulationanalogue systems
0
0 comments X

The pith

Superfluid helium experiments in aerogels identify two distinct pinned vortex regimes that apply to neutron stars.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that superfluid 3He contained in aerogels provides a controllable laboratory system whose vortex pinning behavior matches key aspects of neutron star interiors. A point-vortex simulation distinguishes a crust-like aerogel regime in which existing vortices depin once superflow exceeds a threshold from a core-like regime in which pinned vortices remain fixed and rotation changes occur through sudden creation of new vortices. These two regimes are shown to reproduce the microscopic pinning picture observed in the laboratory. The authors conclude that the same dynamical rules govern neutron star superfluids and therefore supply a new framework for interpreting observed spin glitches. A sympathetic reader would care because the work supplies an experimental route to test theoretical models of quantum rotation at stellar scales.

Core claim

Vortex experiments in superfluid 3He aerogels exhibit two regimes of pinned vortex (non-)dynamics. In crust-like aerogel, vortices depin once the ambient superflow becomes fast enough. In core-like aerogel, pinned vortices are never released and rotational velocity changes are instead accommodated by the avalanche-like production of new vortices. These regimes are extracted from point-vortex simulations and are argued to apply directly inside neutron stars.

What carries the argument

A point-vortex simulation that models the dynamics inside crust-like and core-like aerogels to extract the two regimes of pinned vortex (non-)dynamics.

If this is right

  • In crust-like conditions vortices depin above a critical superflow speed.
  • In core-like conditions pinned vortices remain fixed and spin changes occur only through avalanche creation of new vortices.
  • The same two regimes govern the superfluid components of neutron stars.
  • Neutron-star glitch observations can therefore be re-analyzed using the laboratory-derived pinning rules.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Aerogel samples could be engineered with controlled pore sizes to isolate the effect of pinning strength on glitch size distributions.
  • The avalanche mechanism supplies a concrete prediction for the power-law statistics of large glitches that could be checked against existing pulsar timing data.
  • Similar pinning regimes might appear in other laboratory superfluids such as ultracold atomic gases, allowing cross-system tests of the depinning threshold.

Load-bearing premise

The aerogel pinning environments and length scales are sufficiently similar to neutron-star crust and core that the simulated vortex regimes transfer directly without major corrections for density, temperature, or interaction differences.

What would settle it

A statistical comparison of neutron-star glitch sizes and waiting times against the depinning thresholds and avalanche rates measured or simulated in the two aerogel regimes would confirm or refute the claimed applicability.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.18016 by Brynmor Haskell, Samuli Autti, Vanessa Graber.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Neutron stars make a unique astrophysical test bench for our understanding of quantum physics at kilometre scales. The rotation of a neutron star features glitches, sudden spin-ups that interrupt the otherwise regular stellar spin-down, which are often attributed to the dynamics of pinned quantised vortices in one or several of the superfluid phases inside the star. Laboratory experiments probing superfluid vortices have inspired neutron star theory and simulations from the beginning. Here we argue that vortex experiments in superfluids contained in aerogels show phenomenology that offers a highly appealing but vastly unexplored analogue for neutron star physics. We build a point-vortex simulation that allows analysing experiments in a crust-like and a core-like aerogel, extracting two different regimes of pinned vortex (non-)dynamics and validating a microscopic picture of very strong vortex pinning. In the crust-like aerogel, vortices get depinned once the ambient superflow is fast enough, while in the core-like aerogel pinned vortices are never released and rotational velocity changes are accommodated by the avalanche-like production of new vortices instead. Finally, we show that these concepts should apply also in neutron stars and may thus revolutionise the analysis of neutron star observations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims that point-vortex simulations of superfluid 3He in aerogels identify two distinct regimes of pinned vortex dynamics (ambient-superflow depinning in crust-like aerogel; avalanche creation of new vortices in core-like aerogel) that serve as direct laboratory analogues for neutron-star superfluids and can revolutionize the interpretation of neutron-star glitch observations.

Significance. If the aerogel-to-neutron-star mapping is valid, the work would provide a valuable new experimental window on vortex pinning and unpinning at laboratory-accessible scales, strengthening the link between quantum-fluid experiments and astrophysical superfluid dynamics. The explicit identification of two qualitatively different pinning regimes is a clear strength of the simulation approach.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract / neutron-star extrapolation section] Abstract (final paragraph) and the section presenting the neutron-star extrapolation: the headline claim that the two simulated regimes 'should apply also in neutron stars' rests on the untested premise that pinning length scales, vortex-pin interaction strengths and critical velocities map without order-unity corrections. No derivation of the required dimensionless ratios (accounting for the ~10^14 density contrast, 10^8–10^10 temperature contrast, and neutron versus 3He pairing) is provided, making the direct transferability assertion load-bearing for the central astrophysical claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback. We appreciate the positive assessment of the simulation results and their potential significance. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / neutron-star extrapolation section] Abstract (final paragraph) and the section presenting the neutron-star extrapolation: the headline claim that the two simulated regimes 'should apply also in neutron stars' rests on the untested premise that pinning length scales, vortex-pin interaction strengths and critical velocities map without order-unity corrections. No derivation of the required dimensionless ratios (accounting for the ~10^14 density contrast, 10^8–10^10 temperature contrast, and neutron versus 3He pairing) is provided, making the direct transferability assertion load-bearing for the central astrophysical claim.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from a more explicit discussion of the mapping. The central claim is that the two qualitatively distinct pinned-vortex regimes identified in the simulations (ambient-superflow depinning versus avalanche creation) arise from generic features of strong pinning and should therefore be relevant to neutron-star interiors. While the paper does not contain a full derivation of all dimensionless ratios, the underlying vortex dynamics are governed by the same hydrodynamic equations and pinning phenomenology in both systems. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection that estimates the key dimensionless groups (pinning length relative to intervortex spacing, critical velocity scaled to the ambient superflow, and the ratio of pinning energy to thermal energy), incorporating the stated density and temperature contrasts together with the difference between neutron and 3He pairing. This addition will clarify where order-unity corrections are expected and will allow us to qualify the language in both the abstract and the extrapolation section accordingly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper constructs a point-vortex simulation to analyze aerogel experiments, extracts two pinned-vortex regimes from those runs, and then qualitatively asserts applicability to neutron stars. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown that reduce the extracted regimes or the neutron-star mapping to the simulation inputs by construction. The simulation outputs and the final analogy are independent of any target neutron-star data; the derivation chain therefore remains self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract only; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are specified in the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5740 in / 942 out tokens · 23965 ms · 2026-05-25T06:23:46.744567+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    is composed of 98% empty space with disordered, interconnected spherical silica particles ( d ≈ 5 nm) form- 3 FIG. 1. Superfluid 3He as a laboratory neutron star simulator: ( a) A neutron star is composed of ( b) an s-wave neutron superfluid with an underlying solid lattice in the crust and a p-wave neutron superfluid with an underlying array of flux tubes ho...

    work page

  2. [2]

    core- like

    is of cylindrical shape with radius R = 2. 6 mm. Experimental observations The superfluid 3He placed within the crust-like silica aerogel is in the B phase [ 7], which for the purposes of vortex mechanics is as close to an s-wave system as one can get in superfluid 3He; the B phase gap spectrum is (nearly) isotropic. Thus, the pinning force and the Mag- nus...

    work page 2000

  3. [3]

    and qualitatively supported by the phenomenology of vortex avalanches observed in superconducting films [ 63]. That is, the observed bursts of vortices enter as disor- dered branches, spreading inwards from the points where the superflow first reaches the critical value vc ≈ 2 mm/s at the container side wall centres. The microscopic pro- cess creating these ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Nonequilibrium phenomena in superfluid systems: atomic nuclei, liquid helium, ultracold gases, and neu- tron stars

    by, say, only updating the positions and flow con- tributions of those vortices that are outside a threshold radius for vortex motion (see Fig. 2). Phenomenologi- cal simulations of vortex nucleation avalanches in a neu- tron star (and the core-like aerogel) will require devel- oping new simulation techniques, but the immobility of the vortices once create...

    work page

  5. [6]

    G. Baym, C. Pethick, and D. Pines, Superfluidity in Neu- tron Stars, Nature 224, 673 (1969)

    work page 1969

  6. [7]

    T. S. Wood and V. Graber, Superconducting Phases in Neutron Star Cores, Universe 8, 228 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [8]

    A. Basu, B. Shaw, D. Antonopoulou, M. J. Keith, A. G. Lyne, M. B. Mickaliger, B. W. Stappers, P. Weltevrede, and C. A. Jordan, The Jodrell bank glitch catalogue: 106 new rotational glitches in 70 pulsars, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 510, 4049 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [9]

    Antonopoulou, B

    D. Antonopoulou, B. Haskell, and C. M. Espinoza, Pulsar glitches: observations and physical interpretation, Re- ports on Progress in Physics (2022)

    work page 2022

  9. [10]

    Dmitriev, A

    V. Dmitriev, A. Soldatov, and A. Yudin, Superfluid 3He in a nematic aerogel, Journal of Experimental and The- oretical Physics 131, 2 (2020)

    work page 2020

  10. [11]

    Alles, J

    H. Alles, J. Kaplinsky, P. Wootton, J. Reppy, J. Naish, and J. Hook, Evidence for superfluid B phase of 3He in aerogel, Physical review letters 83, 1367 (1999)

    work page 1999

  11. [12]

    W. P. Halperin, Superfluid 3He in aerogel, Annual Re- view of Condensed Matter Physics 10, 155 (2019)

    work page 2019

  12. [13]

    Pollanen, J

    J. Pollanen, J. Li, C. Collett, W. Gannon, W. Halperin, and J. Sauls, New chiral phases of superfluid 3He stabi- lized by anisotropic silica aerogel, Nature Physics 8, 317 (2012)

    work page 2012

  13. [14]

    V. V. Dmitriev, M. Kutuzov, A. A. Soldatov, and A. N. Yudin, Superfluid 3He in squeezed nematic aerogel, JETP Letters 110, 734 (2019)

    work page 2019

  14. [15]

    Scott, M

    J. Scott, M. Nguyen, D. Park, and W. Halperin, Pla- nar aerogel and superfluid 3He, structure and transitions, Journal of Low Temperature Physics 215, 407 (2024)

    work page 2024

  15. [16]

    Dmitriev, M

    V. Dmitriev, M. Kutuzov, A. Mikheev, V. Morozov, A. Soldatov, and A. Yudin, Superfluid 3He in planar aero- gel, Physical Review B 102, 144507 (2020)

    work page 2020

  16. [17]

    V. V. Dmitriev, A. A. Senin, A. A. Soldatov, and A. N. Yudin, Polar phase of superfluid 3He in anisotropic aero- gel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 165304 (2015)

    work page 2015

  17. [18]

    M. M. Salomaa and G. E. Volovik, Quantized vortices in superfluid 3He, Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 533 (1987)

    work page 1987

  18. [19]

    Autti, V

    S. Autti, V. V. Dmitriev, J. T. Mäkinen, A. A. Soldatov, G. E. Volovik, A. N. Yudin, V. V. Zavjalov, and V. B. Eltsov, Observation of half-quantum vortices in topolog- ical superfluid 3He, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 255301 (2016)

    work page 2016

  19. [20]

    V. M. H. Ruutu, J. Kopu, M. Krusius, U. Parts, B. Plaçais, E. V. Thuneberg, and W. Xu, Critical ve- locity of vortex nucleation in rotating superfluid 3He-A, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 5058 (1997)

    work page 1997

  20. [21]

    Parts, J

    U. Parts, J. M. Karimäki, J. H. Koivuniemi, M. Krusius, V. M. H. Ruutu, E. V. Thuneberg, and G. E. Volovik, 14 Phase diagram of vortices in superfluid 3He-A, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3320 (1995)

    work page 1995

  21. [22]

    Rantanen and V

    R. Rantanen and V. Eltsov, Competition of vortex core structures in superfluid 3He−B, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 043112 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [23]

    J. P. Pekola, J. T. Simola, P. J. Hakonen, M. Krusius, O. V. Lounasmaa, K. K. Nummila, G. Mamniashvili, R. E. Packard, and G. E. Volovik, Phase diagram of the first-order vortex-core transition in superfluid 3He- B, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 584 (1984)

    work page 1984

  23. [24]

    M. A. Alpar, D. Pines, P. W. Anderson, and J. Shaham, Vortex creep and the internal temperature of neutron stars. I - General theory, Astrophys. J. 276, 325 (1984)

    work page 1984

  24. [25]

    Rainer and M

    D. Rainer and M. Vuorio, Small objects in superfluid 3He, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 10, 3093 (1977)

    work page 1977

  25. [26]

    Mäkinen, V

    J. Mäkinen, V. Dmitriev, J. Nissinen, J. Rysti, G. Volovik, A. Yudin, K. Zhang, and V. Eltsov, Half- quantum vortices and walls bounded by strings in the polar-distorted phases of topological superfluid 3He, Na- ture Communications 10 (2019)

    work page 2019

  26. [27]

    J. Li, J. Pollanen, A. Zimmerman, C. Collett, W. Gan- non, and W. Halperin, The superfluid glass phase of 3He- A, Nature Physics 9, 775 (2013)

    work page 2013

  27. [28]

    Volovik, On larkin-imry-ma state of 3He-A in aerogel, Journal of Low Temperature Physics 150, 453 (2008)

    G. Volovik, On larkin-imry-ma state of 3He-A in aerogel, Journal of Low Temperature Physics 150, 453 (2008)

    work page 2008

  28. [29]

    Bevan, A

    T. Bevan, A. Manninen, J. Cook, H. Alles, J. Hook, and H. Hall, Vortex mutual friction in superfluid 3 he, Journal of low temperature physics 109, 423 (1997)

    work page 1997

  29. [30]

    P. W. Anderson and N. Itoh, Pulsar glitches and restless- ness as a hard superfluidity phenomenon, Nature (Lon- don) 256, 25 (1975)

    work page 1975

  30. [31]

    Ahmad, S

    S. Ahmad, S. Ahmad, and J. N. Sheikh, Silica centered aerogels as advanced functional material and their ap- plications: A review, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 611, 122322 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [32]

    Zhelev, M

    N. Zhelev, M. Reichl, T. S. Abhilash, E. N. Smith, K. Nguyen, E. Mueller, and J. M. Parpia, Observation of a new superfluid phase for 3He embedded in nemat- ically ordered aerogel, Nature communications 7, 12975 (2016)

    work page 2016

  32. [33]

    Ruutu, Ü

    V. Ruutu, Ü. Parts, J. Koivuniemi, N. Kopnin, and M. Krusius, Intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms of vortex formation in superfluid 3He-B, Journal of low tempera- ture physics 107, 93 (1997)

    work page 1997

  33. [34]

    G. E. Volovik, The Universe in a Helium Droplet (Oxford University Press, 2003)

    work page 2003

  34. [35]

    Yamashita, A

    M. Yamashita, A. Matsubara, R. Ishiguro, Y. Sasaki, Y. Kataoka, M. Kubota, O. Ishikawa, Y. M. Bunkov, T. Ohmi, T. Takagi, et al. , Pinning of texture and vor- tices of the rotating B-like phase of superfluid He-3 con- fined in a 98% aerogel, Physical review letters 94, 075301 (2005)

    work page 2005

  35. [36]

    Pines, J

    D. Pines, J. Shaham, M. A. Alpar, and P. W. Anderson, Pinned vorticity in rotating superfluids, with application to neutron stars., Progress of Theoretical Physics Sup- plement 69, 376 (1980)

    work page 1980

  36. [37]

    Haskell, D

    B. Haskell, D. Antonopoulou, and C. Barenghi, Turbu- lent, pinned superfluids in neutron stars and pulsar glitch recoveries, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 499, 161 (2020)

    work page 2020

  37. [38]

    Physics of Neutron Star Crusts

    N. Chamel and P. Haensel, Physics of Neutron Star Crusts, Living Reviews in Relativity 11, 10 (2008) , arXiv:0812.3955 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  38. [39]

    Glitch rises as a test for rapid superfluid coupling in neutron stars

    V. Graber, A. Cumming, and N. Andersson, Glitch Rises as a Test for Rapid Superfluid Coupling in Neu- tron Stars, The Astrophysical Journal 865, 23 (2018) , arXiv:1804.02706 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  39. [40]

    Y. M. Bunkov, A. Chen, D. Cousins, and H. Godfrin, Semisuperfluidity of 3He in aerogel?, Physical Review Letters 85, 3456 (2000)

    work page 2000

  40. [41]

    V. B. Eltsov, A. I. Golov, R. de Graaf, R. Hänninen, M. Krusius, V. S. L’vov, and R. E. Solntsev, Quantum turbulence in a propagating superfluid vortex front, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 265301 (2007)

    work page 2007

  41. [42]

    Eltsov, J

    V. Eltsov, J. Hosio, and M. Krusius, Kelvin–Helmholtz instability in 3He superfluids in zero-temperature limit, Journal of Low Temperature Physics 217, 292 (2024)

    work page 2024

  42. [43]

    Skrbek, R

    L. Skrbek, R. Blaauwgeers, V. Eltsov, A. Finne, N. Kop- nin, and M. Krusius, Vortex flow in rotating superfluid 3He-B, Physica B: Condensed Matter 329, 106 (2003)

    work page 2003

  43. [44]

    Eltsov, A

    V. Eltsov, A. Gordeev, and M. Krusius, Kelvin- Helmholtz instability of ab interface in superfluid 3He, Physical Review B 99, 054104 (2019)

    work page 2019

  44. [45]

    Autti, J

    S. Autti, J. T. Mäkinen, J. Rysti, G. E. Volovik, V. V. Zavjalov, and V. B. Eltsov, Exceeding the Landau speed limit with topological Bogoliubov Fermi surfaces, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033013 (2020)

    work page 2020

  45. [46]

    Seveso, P

    S. Seveso, P. M. Pizzochero, F. Grill, and B. Haskell, Mesoscopic pinning forces in neutron star crusts, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 455, 3952 (2016)

    work page 2016

  46. [47]

    Sauls, Superfluidity in the interiors of neutron stars, in Timing Neutron Stars , NATO Advanced Study Insti- tute (ASI) Series C, Vol

    J. Sauls, Superfluidity in the interiors of neutron stars, in Timing Neutron Stars , NATO Advanced Study Insti- tute (ASI) Series C, Vol. 262, edited by H. Ögelman and E. P. J. van den Heuvel (1989) p. 457

    work page 1989

  47. [48]

    Neutron Stars in the Laboratory

    V. Graber, N. Andersson, and M. Hogg, Neutron stars in the laboratory, International Journal of Modern Physics D 26, 1730015-347 (2017) , arXiv:1610.06882 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  48. [49]

    Superfluidity and Superconductivity in Neutron Stars

    N. Chamel, Superfluidity and Superconductivity in Neu- tron Stars, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy 38, 43 (2017) , arXiv:1709.07288 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  49. [50]

    nematically ordered

    V. E. Asadchikov, R. S. Askhadullin, V. V. Volkov, V. V. Dmitriev, N. K. Kitaeva, P. N. Martynov, A. A. Osipov, A. A. Senin, A. A. Soldatov, D. I. Chekrygina, and A. N. Yudin, Structure and properties of “nematically ordered” aerogels, JETP Lett. 101, 556 (2015)

    work page 2015

  50. [51]

    V. P. Mineev, Nmr properties of the polar phase of su- perfluid 3he in anisotropic aerogel under rotation, J Low Temp. Phys. 184, 1007 (2016)

    work page 2016

  51. [52]

    Rysti, J

    J. Rysti, J. T. Mäkinen, S. Autti, T. Kamppinen, G. E. Volovik, and V. B. Eltsov, Suppressing the Kibble-Zurek mechanism by a symmetry-violating bias, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 115702 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [53]

    Autti, V

    S. Autti, V. V. Dmitriev, J. T. Mäkinen, J. Rysti, A. A. Soldatov, G. E. Volovik, A. N. Yudin, and V. B. Eltsov, Bose-einstein condensation of magnons and spin superflu- idity in the polar phase of 3He, Physical Review Letters 121, 025303 (2018)

    work page 2018

  53. [54]

    Autti, P

    S. Autti, P. Heikkinen, S. Laine, J. Mäkinen, E. Thuneberg, V. Zavjalov, and V. Eltsov, Vortex- mediated relaxation of magnon BEC into light Higgs quasiparticles, Physical Review Research 3, L032002 (2021)

    work page 2021

  54. [55]

    V. M. H. Ruutu, V. B. Eltsov, A. J. Gill, W. B. Kibble, M. Krusius, Y. G. Makhlin, B. Placais, G. E. Volovik, and W. Xu, Vortex formation in neutron-irradiated su- perfluid 3He as an analogue of cosmological defect for- 15 mation, Nature 382, 334 (1996)

    work page 1996

  55. [56]

    Bauerle, Y

    C. Bauerle, Y. M. Bunkov, S. N. Fisher, H. Godfrin, and G. R. Pickett, Laboratory simulation of cosmic string for- mation in the early universe using superfluid 3He, Nature 382, 332 (1996)

    work page 1996

  56. [57]

    Y. M. Bunkov, A. I. Golov, V. S. L’vov, A. Pomyalov, and I. Procaccia, Evolution of a neutron-initiated micro big bang in superfluid 3He − B, Phys. Rev. B 90, 024508 (2014)

    work page 2014

  57. [58]

    V. B. Eltsov, M. Krusius, and G. E. Volovik, Progr. in Low Temp. Phys. , Vol. XV, p. 1-137 (Elsevier, 2005)

    work page 2005

  58. [59]

    Blaauwgeers, V

    R. Blaauwgeers, V. Eltsov, M. Krusius, J. Ruohio, R. Schanen, and G. Volovik, Double-quantum vortex in superfluid 3He-a, Nature 404, 471 (2000)

    work page 2000

  59. [60]

    Rantanen, E

    R. Rantanen, E. Thuneberg, and V. Eltsov, Structure of a single-quantum vortex in 3he-a, Journal of Low Tem- perature Physics 220, 88 (2025)

    work page 2025

  60. [61]

    Vollhardt and P

    D. Vollhardt and P. Wölfle, The Superfluid Phases of Helium 3 (Dover Publications, 2013)

    work page 2013

  61. [62]

    Volovik, Glass state of superfluid 3He-A in an aerogel, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters 63, 301 (1996)

    G. Volovik, Glass state of superfluid 3He-A in an aerogel, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters 63, 301 (1996)

    work page 1996

  62. [63]

    V. V. Dmitriev, D. Krasnikhin, N. Mulders, A. Senin, G. E. Volovik, and A. Yudin, Orbital glass and spin glass states of 3He-A in aerogel, JETP letters 91, 599 (2010)

    work page 2010

  63. [64]

    Kopnin and M

    N. Kopnin and M. Salomaa, Mutual friction in superfluid he 3: Effects of bound states in the vortex core, Physical Review B 44, 9667 (1991)

    work page 1991

  64. [65]

    V. P. Mineev, Half-quantum vortices in polar phase of superfluid 3He, J. Low Temp. Phys. 177, 48 (2014)

    work page 2014

  65. [66]

    G. E. Volovik and V. P. Mineev, Line and point singlu- larities in superfluid 3He, JETP Lett. 24, 561 (1976)

    work page 1976

  66. [67]

    Altshuler and T

    E. Altshuler and T. Johansen, Colloquium: Experiments in vortex avalanches, Reviews of Modern Physics 76, 471 (2004)

    work page 2004

  67. [68]

    Graber, A

    V. Graber, A. Cumming, and N. Andersson, Glitch rises as a test for rapid superfluid coupling in neutron stars, The Astrophysical Journal 865, 23 (2018)

    work page 2018

  68. [69]

    Howitt, A

    G. Howitt, A. Melatos, and B. Haskell, Simulating pulsar glitches: an n-body solver for superfluid vortex motion in two dimensions, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro- nomical Society 498, 320 (2020)

    work page 2020

  69. [70]

    superfluid 3He aerogel experiments as a lab- oratory neutron star analogue

    S. Autti, V. Graber, and B. Haskell, Dataset for the manuscript "superfluid 3He aerogel experiments as a lab- oratory neutron star analogue" (2026). 16 TABLE I. Characteristics of superfluid 3He in terrestrial experiments vs neutron star (NS) superfluidity. We distinguish crust-like and core-like aerogels and provide relevant parameters for the NS crust and ...

    work page 2026