Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 49 references

Integrable Deformation of Space Curves, Generalized Heisenberg Ferromagnet Equation and Two-Component Modified Camassa-Holm Equation

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The M-CV spin equation and the two-component modified Camassa-Holm equation are geometrically equivalent: both are space-curve flows in three dimensions.

desk verdict The claimed M-CV/2-mCHE geometric equivalence fails even at the zero solution; Section 3 is an undeveloped ansatz, not a derivation. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.01371 v1 pith:FLBRRFFR submitted 2019-08-04 nlin.SI

Bayan Kutum , Gulgassyl Nugmanova , Tolkynay Myrzakul , Kuralay Yesmakhanova , Ratbay Myrzakulov This is my paper · ORCID
classification nlin.SI MSC 37K1037K2535Q5135Q53
keywords M-CVequationtwo-componentmodifiedCamassa-HolmspacecurveflowsFrenet-SerretframegeometricequivalencegaugeintegrablesystemsLaxpair
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes a geometric bridge between two integrable equations: the M-CV equation, a peakon-type spin system, and the two-component modified Camassa-Holm equation (2-mCHE). By identifying the spin vector with the tangent vector of a moving space curve and imposing the Frenet-Serret compatibility conditions, the authors show that the curve-flow equations for the M-CV system reduce exactly to the 2-mCHE. The result gives the 2-mCHE a concrete three-dimensional geometric formulation and identifies the M-CV equation as its geometric counterpart. If correct, the two equations describe the same invariant curve motion in Euclidean space and are related by a gauge transformation.

What carries the argument

The central object is the moving trihedron of a smooth space curve in $\mathbb{R}^3$, built from the tangent $e_1$, normal $e_2$, and binormal $e_3$, together with the Frenet-Serret frame matrix $C$ and its temporal counterpart $G$. The paper's move is to identify the M-CV spin vector $A$ with $e_1$, so the compatibility condition $C_t-G_x+[C,G]=0$ between the two frame equations becomes the equations of motion. The specific choice of $\omega_1,\omega_2,\omega_3$ in (37)--(39) is what converts those equations into the two-component modified Camassa-Holm system (40)--(43), and this substitution is the mechanism that carries the claimed geometric equivalence.

What would settle it

Derive the frame coefficients $\omega_1,\omega_2,\omega_3$ from the M-CV Lax pair (24)--(28) under the identification $A=e_1$ without imposing the ansatz (37)--(39); if the resulting compatibility equations do not match the 2-mCHE (40)--(43) for generic $u,q,r,v$, the claimed geometric equivalence breaks. Equivalently, exhibit a solution of the 2-mCHE whose corresponding curve flow does not satisfy the M-CV Lax pair.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The core claim is that the M-CV equation and the two-component modified Camassa-Holm equation are geometrically equivalent: both arise from the same family of invariant space curve flows in three-dimensional Euclidean geometry. The derivation takes the spin vector $A$ to equal the unit tangent $e_1$ of the curve and writes the arc-length and time frame equations (29) with coefficients $\kappa_1,\kappa_2,\tau$ and $\omega_1,\omega_2,\omega_3$. Substituting the identifications $\kappa_1=-2\zeta$, $\kappa_2=r-q$, $\tau=-i(r+q)$ together with the ansatz (37)--(39) for the $\omega_j$ into the compatibility equations (32)--(34) yields the 2-mCHE (40)--(43). The paper therefore concludes that the M-CV equation and the 2-mCHE are geometric equivalents, and notes that the gauge equivalence $\Psi=G\Phi$ is demonstrated in a separate work.

Load-bearing premise

The whole argument rests on the three formulas for $\omega_1,\omega_2,\omega_3$ in equations (37)--(39), which are chosen to make the compatibility equations reduce to the 2-mCHE rather than derived from the M-CV Lax pair.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The two-component modified Camassa-Holm equation acquires a geometric description as an invariant space curve flow, so its solutions correspond to motions of curves in Euclidean three-space.
  • The M-CV spin equation and the 2-mCHE are connected by a gauge transformation at the level of their Lax pairs, refining the geometric equivalence to a statement about their linear systems.
  • The reduction $v=u$ recovers the single-component modified Camassa-Holm equation inside the same curve-flow picture.
  • The scalar form of the 2-mCHE Lax pair, equations (52)--(53), can be read as a consequence of the curve-flow compatibility and studied from the geometric data directly.
  • The known relation between peakon-type spin systems and Camassa-Holm type equations is extended to the two-component setting.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The ansatz (37)--(39) for $\omega_1,\omega_2,\omega_3$ is selected to make the compatibility equations simplify to the 2-mCHE; if a derivation of this ansatz from the M-CV Lax pair could be supplied, the equivalence would be fully self-contained rather than resting on a guessed substitution.
  • The same curve-flow construction is likely to work for other Camassa-Holm type reductions, such as the Degasperis-Procesi or Novikov equations, by choosing different identifications of the frame coefficients with spectral parameters.
  • If the geometric equivalence holds, peakon solutions of the 2-mCHE should correspond to singular or piecewise-smooth curve flows, giving a geometric picture of peakon dynamics that has not yet been worked out.
  • The identification $A\equiv e_1$ suggests that the M-CV equation can be read as motion of the tangent indicatrix of a curve; testing whether the gauge transformation $\Psi=G\Phi$ preserves this identification would tie the two Lax pairs together directly.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper claims to provide a geometric formulation of the two-component modified Camassa-Holm equation (2-mCHE) and to establish a Lakshmanan (geometrical) equivalence between the M-CV equation (21) and the 2-mCHE (44)-(47) via invariant space curve flows in three-dimensional Euclidean geometry. Section 3 identifies the spin vector A with the tangent vector e1, imposes an ansatz for the curvature/torsion functions (36) and for the temporal rotation functions (37)-(39), and asserts that the curve compatibility conditions (32)-(34) reduce to the 2-mCHE equations (40)-(43). Section 5 claims gauge equivalence between the M-CV equation and the 2-mCHE, referring to the unpublished work [47].

Significance. If the central claim were correct, the paper would establish an interesting bridge between a modified Camassa-Holm type system and a Heisenberg-ferromagnet-type spin equation, contributing to the geometric understanding of peakon integrable systems. However, the manuscript does not actually carry out the derivation: the functions in the ansatz are selected rather than derived, the M-CV equation and its Lax pair are never used, and the claimed reduction is algebraically inconsistent at the zero solution. The gauge equivalence is not proved. No machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, or parameter-free derivations are supplied that would offset these shortcomings. The paper therefore does not make a convincing case for its main claims.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3, Eqs. (37)-(39)] The functions ω1, ω2, ω3 are introduced by fiat, with no derivation from the M-CV equation (21) or its Lax pair (24)-(28). Equations (32)-(34) are the compatibility conditions of the curve flow, but the paper never substitutes any quantity computed from (24)-(28); instead, the ansatz is chosen so that the compatibility conditions formally match the known 2-mCHE (40)-(43). This is circular: the target equation is fed in through the choice of ω_j. A valid geometric derivation must show that the ω_j determined by the M-CV Lax pair under A=e1 produce these expressions, or at least derive them from the M-CV equation.
  2. [Section 3, Eqs. (32)-(34) with (36)-(39)] The claimed reduction fails already at the zero solution of the 2-mCHE. Setting u=v=0 gives q=r=0 via (42)-(43), hence κ1=-2ζ, κ2=0, τ=0 from (36), and ω1=i/(2λ), ω2=1/(2λ), ω3=i/(2λ^2) from (37)-(39). Substituting into (33) gives κ2t - ω2x + κ1ω1 - τω3 = -iζ/λ, and into (34) gives τt - ω1x - κ1ω2 + κ2ω3 = ζ/λ; these vanish only if ζ=0, which is not a stated restriction. Thus the compatibility system does not reduce to the 2-mCHE even for the simplest solution, independent of any concern about the motivation of the ansatz. Moreover, the ω_j are complex-valued for real u, v, so the claimed flow is not a real Euclidean curve flow.
  3. [Section 3, end] The statement that 'we have proved that the Lakshmanan (geometrical) equivalent counterpart of the M-CV equation is the 2-mCHE' is not supported by the preceding text. The M-CV equation (21) itself is never substituted anywhere in the derivation; the ansatz (36) depends on q, r, u and v, not on A. The reader cannot verify that the curve flow induced by the M-CV Lax pair has the stated curvatures, so the claimed equivalence is not established.
  4. [Section 5] The gauge equivalence between the M-CV equation and the 2-mCHE is disposed of in one sentence referring to the unpublished work [47]. Since gauge equivalence is a central claim in the abstract and conclusions, the paper must provide either the transformation Ψ=GΦ explicitly or a proof. Delegating the key result to an inaccessible reference is not acceptable.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3, first paragraph] The word 'respectivily' should be 'respectively'.
  2. [Acknowledgements] The word 'Edication' should be 'Education'.
  3. [Reference [49]] The text 'B?acklund' appears to be a typo for 'Bäcklund', and 'Schif' should be 'Schiff'.
  4. [Section 4, Eq. (52)] The scalar form of the Lax pair is presented without defining the transformation from the 2x2 system (48)-(51) to the scalar φ; please add the relation.
  5. [General] The acronym M-CV is used throughout without being defined; consider spelling it out at first use.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 7.0 of 10

Central equivalence claim reduces to a tailored ansatz: the ω-functions (37)-(39) are chosen so that compatibility (32)-(34) becomes the 2-mCHE, while the M-CV equation is never substituted; gauge equivalence is delegated to an unpublished self-citation.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 3, Eqs. (36)-(43) (derivation of the 2-mCHE from the curve-flow compatibility conditions)]
    "Let take place the following expressions κ1 = −2ζ, κ2 = r − q, τ = −i(r + q), ... Then we have ω1 = i[(0.5λ−1 − λu)(q + 1) + 0.5λ−2(ux + uxx)], ... ω3 = i[0.5λ−2 − u − ux]. Eqs.(32)-(34) give us the following equations for q,u: ... It is the 2-mCHE. So, we have proved that the Lakshmanan (geometrical) equivalent counterpart of the M-CV equation is the 2-mCHE."

    The compatibility conditions (32)-(34) are generic identities for any curve, and the M-CV equation (21) or its Lax pair (24)-(28) is never substituted into them. Instead κ1, κ2, τ, and ω1, ω2, ω3 are posited in (36)-(39) directly in terms of q, r, u and derivatives, with free constants ζ and λ, so that (32)-(34) reduce algebraically to the target 2-mCHE (40)-(43). The target is therefore already encoded in the chosen ω-functions; the claimed proof that the Lakshmanan counterpart of M-CV is the 2-mCHE is an output built into the ansatz, not a consequence of the M-CV equation. The reduction to 2-mCHE is by construction of the ansatz.

  2. self citation load bearing [Section 5, final paragraph before Conclusions]
    "Lastly we note that these equations are also gauge equivalent each to other. It was shown in [47] that in this case Ψ = GΦ."

    The gauge-equivalence assertion is load-bearing for the abstract's claim that gauge equivalence is considered, but its only support is reference [47], an unpublished work by one of the present authors. No gauge transformation G is displayed, no Lax-pair reduction is checked, and no external verification is cited. The claim therefore rests on a self-citation that is not independently assessable from the paper.

full rationale

The central geometric-equivalence claim is not self-contained: Section 3 never uses the M-CV equation or its Lax pair, and the 2-mCHE appears from compatibility only after the ω-functions are chosen in (37)-(39) to contain the q, u, and derivative structure of that very equation. Consequently the prediction that the M-CV equation is geometrically equivalent to the 2-mCHE reduces to a fitted ansatz. The gauge-equivalence remark is delegated to unpublished work [47] by an author, which is load-bearing self-citation. A separate algebraic check indicates the proposed reduction is inconsistent even for the trivial solution u=v=0 unless ζ=0, since the ζ terms survive in (33)-(34); this is a correctness problem beyond circularity. Because the central claim itself is forced by the tailored ansatz rather than by an independent derivation from M-CV, the circularity score is 7.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the curve-flow geometry (standard), the assumed integrability of the M-CV equation (domain), and a set of ansatz equations chosen to reproduce the target 2-mCHE (ad hoc). No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • β
    Constant appearing in the M-CV equation (21) and its Lax pair (24)-(28); no numerical value or fitting is provided, and the paper never justifies its role.
  • λ
    Spectral parameter in the Lax pairs and in the ansatz for ω1, ω2, ω3 (37)-(39); it is a standard spectral parameter, but in this derivation it is effectively chosen to make the compatibility condition match the 2-mCHE.
  • ζ
    Constant introduced in Eq. (36) as κ1 = -2ζ; it is a parameter of the ansatz and no meaning or value is assigned.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Frenet-Serret equations for a curve in R3 (Eqs. (29)-(30))
    Used as the geometric framework for the curve flow.
  • standard math Compatibility condition Ct - Gx + [C,G] = 0 (Eq. (31))
    Ensures consistency of the x- and t-evolutions of the frame; standard zero-curvature condition.
  • domain assumption The M-CV equation (21) and its Lax pair (24)-(28) are taken as given
    No derivation or citation to a source for the integrability of M-CV is provided; the reader must accept it from prior literature.
  • domain assumption Identification of the spin vector with the tangent vector: A ≡ e1 (Eq. (35))
    This is the standard Lakshmanan equivalence, but its validity for the M-CV equation is not demonstrated.
  • ad hoc to paper The ansatz for κ1, κ2, τ (Eq. (36)) and ω1, ω2, ω3 (Eqs. (37)-(39))
    These expressions are chosen to force the compatibility condition to yield the 2-mCHE; they are not derived from the M-CV Lax pair.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Integrable Deformation of Space Curves, Generalized Heisenberg Ferromagnet Equation and Two-Component Modified Camassa-Holm Equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FLBRRFFR

@misc{pith2026190801371,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Integrable Deformation of Space Curves, Generalized Heisenberg Ferromagnet Equation and Two-Component Modified Camassa-Holm Equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FLBRRFFR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.01371}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we provide the geometric formulation to the two-component Camassa-Holm equation (2-mCHE). We also study the relation between the 2-mCHE and the M-CV equation. We have shown that these equations arise from the invariant space curve flows in three-dimensional Euclidean geometry. Using this approach we have established the geometrical equivalence between the 2-mCHE and the M-CV equation. The gauge equivalence between these equations is also considered.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages

  1. [47]

    Gauge equivalence between the M-CV equation and the two- component Camassa-Holm equation

    Kutum B. Gauge equivalence between the M-CV equation and the two- component Camassa-Holm equation

    work page

  2. [1]

    Multipeakons of a two-component modified Camassa-Holm equation and the relation with the finite Kac-van Moerbeke lattice

    Chang X-K., Hu X-B., Szmigiels J. Multipeakons of a two-component modified Camassa-Holm equation and the relation with the fini te Kac- Van Moerbeke lattice, [arXiv:1512.08300]

    work page Pith review arXiv

  3. [2]

    Two component integrable systems modelling shallow water waves: the constant vorticity case

    Ivanov R.I. Two component integrable systems modelling shallow water waves: the constant vorticity case , [arXiv:0906.0780]

    work page Pith review arXiv

  4. [3]

    Integrable peakon equations with cubic nonlin- earity, [arXiv:0805.4310]

    Hone A.N.W., Wang J.P. Integrable peakon equations with cubic nonlin- earity, [arXiv:0805.4310]

    arXiv

  5. [4]

    Nugmanova, Z

    G. Nugmanova, Z. Zhunussova, K. Yesmakhanova, G. Mamyrbe kova, R. Myrzakulov. International Journal of Mathematical, Computa tional, Statistical, Natural and Physical Engineering, 9, N8, 328-331 (2015)

    2015

  6. [5]

    J.-S. He, Y. Cheng, Y.-S. Li. Commun. Theor. Phys., 38, 493-496 (2002)

    2002

  7. [6]

    Saleem, M

    U. Saleem, M. Hasan. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 43, 045204 (2010)

    2010

  8. [7]

    Lakshmanan, Phil

    M. Lakshmanan, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 369 1280-1300 (2011)

    2011

Show all 49 references
  1. [8]

    Lakshmanan, Phys

    M. Lakshmanan, Phys. Lett. A, 64, 53-54 (1977)

    1977

  2. [9]

    Myrzakulov, S

    R. Myrzakulov, S. Vijayalakshmi, G. Nugmanova , M. Lakshmanan Physics Letters A, 233 , 14-6, 391-396 (1997)

    1997

  3. [10]

    Myrzakulov, S

    R. Myrzakulov, S. Vijayalakshmi, R. Syzdykova, M. Lakshmana n, J. Math. Phys., 39, 2122-2139 (1998)

    1998

  4. [11]

    Myrzakulov, M

    R. Myrzakulov, M. Lakshmanan, S. Vijayalakshmi, A. Danlybaev a , J. Math. Phys., 39, 3765-3771 (1998). 7

    1998

  5. [12]

    Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, V.118, 13, P

    Myrzakulov R, Danlybaeva A.K, Nugmanova G.N. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, V.118, 13, P. 441-451 (1999)

    1999

  6. [13]

    Journal of Physics A: Mathematical & Theoretical, V.31, 147, P.9535-9545 (1998)

    Myrzakulov R., Nugmanova G., Syzdykova R. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical & Theoretical, V.31, 147, P.9535-9545 (1998)

    1998

  7. [14]

    Physica A., V.234, 13-4, P.715- 724 (1997)

    Myrzakulov R., Daniel M., Amuda R. Physica A., V.234, 13-4, P.715- 724 (1997)

    1997

  8. [15]

    Letters in Mathema tical Physics, V.16, N1, P.83-92 (1989)

    Myrzakulov R., Makhankov V.G., Pashaev O.?. Letters in Mathema tical Physics, V.16, N1, P.83-92 (1989)

    1989

  9. [16]

    Physica Scripta, V .35, N3, P

    Myrzakulov R., Makhankov V.G., Makhankov A. Physica Scripta, V .35, N3, P. 233-237 (1987)

    1987

  10. [17]

    Physica Scripta, V .33, N4, P

    Myrzakulov R., Pashaev O.?., Kholmurodov Kh. Physica Scripta, V .33, N4, P. 378-384 (1986)

    1986

  11. [18]

    Journal of Geometry and Physics, v.60 , 1576- 1603 (2010)

    Anco S.C., Myrzakulov R. Journal of Geometry and Physics, v.60 , 1576- 1603 (2010)

    2010

  12. [19]

    On the ge- ometry of stationary Heisenberg ferromagnets

    Myrzakulov R., Rahimov F.K., Myrzakul K., Serikbaev N.S. On the ge- ometry of stationary Heisenberg ferromagnets . In: ”Non-linear waves: Classical and Quantum Aspects”, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dor- drecht, Netherlands, P. 543-549 (2004)

    2004

  13. [20]

    On con- tinuous limits of some generalized compressible Heisenber g spin chains

    Myrzakulov R., Serikbaev N.S., Myrzakul Kur., Rahimov F.K. On con- tinuous limits of some generalized compressible Heisenber g spin chains . Journal of NATO Science Series II. Mathematics, Physics and Chem - istry, V 153, P. 535-542 (2004)

    2004

  14. [21]

    R.Myrzakulov, G. K. Mamyrbekova, G. N. Nugmanova, M. Laksh - manan. Symmetry, 7(3), 1352-1375 (2015). [arXiv:1305.0098]

    2015 arXiv

  15. [22]

    R.Myrzakulov, G. K. Mamyrbekova, G. N. Nugmanova, K. Yesmakhanova, M. Lakshmanan. Physics Letters A, 378, N30-31, 2118- 2123 (2014). [arXiv:1404.2088]

    2014 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Inte- grable Heisenberg ferromagnets and soliton geometry of cur ves and sur- faces

    Myrzakulov R., Martina L., Kozhamkulov T.A., Myrzakul Kur. Inte- grable Heisenberg ferromagnets and soliton geometry of cur ves and sur- faces. In book: ”Nonlinear Physics: Theory and Experiment. II”. World Scientific, London, P. 248-253 (2003) 8

    2003

  17. [24]

    Integrability of the Gauss-Codazzi-Mainardi equation in 2+1 dimensions

    Myrzakulov R. Integrability of the Gauss-Codazzi-Mainardi equation in 2+1 dimensions . In ”Mathematical Problems of Nonlinear Dynamics”, Proc. of the Int. Conf. ”Progress in Nonlinear sciences”, Nizhny N ov- gorod, Russia, July 2-6, 2001, V.1, P.314-319 (2001)

    2001

  18. [25]

    Darboux Tranformation and Exact Solutions of the Myrzakulov-I Equations

    Chen Chi, Zhou Zi-Xiang. Darboux Tranformation and Exact Solutions of the Myrzakulov-I Equations . Chin. Phys. Lett., 26, N8, 080504 (2009)

    2009

  19. [26]

    Darboux Transformation with a Double Spec- tral Parameter for the Myrzakulov-I Equation

    Chen Hai, Zhou Zi-Xiang. Darboux Transformation with a Double Spec- tral Parameter for the Myrzakulov-I Equation . Chin. Phys. Lett., 31, N12, 120504 (2014)

    2014

  20. [27]

    Zhao-Wen Yan, Min-Ru Chen, Ke Wu, Wei-Zhong Zhao. J. Phys. S oc. Jpn., 81, 094006 (2012)

    2012

  21. [28]

    Yan Zhao-Wen, Chen Min-Ru, Wu Ke, Zhao Wei-Zhong. Commun. Theor. Phys., 58, 463-468 (2012)

    2012

  22. [29]

    Ysmakhanova, G.N

    K.R. Ysmakhanova, G.N. Nugmanova, Wei-Zhong Zhao, Ke Wu. Inte- grable inhomogeneous Lakshmanan-Myrzakulov equation, [nlin/0604034]

    arXiv

  23. [30]

    On the inte- grable inhomogeneous Myrzakulov-I equation , [arXiv: nlin/0603069]

    Zhen-Huan Zhang, Ming Deng, Wei-Zhong Zhao, Ke Wu. On the inte- grable inhomogeneous Myrzakulov-I equation , [arXiv: nlin/0603069]

    arXiv

  24. [31]

    Journal of M ath- ematical Physics, V.42, 13, P.1397-1417 (2001)

    Martina L, Myrzakul Kur., Myrzakulov R, Soliani G. Journal of M ath- ematical Physics, V.42, 13, P.1397-1417 (2001)

    2001

  25. [32]

    Journal of Modern Optics, 2015

    Xiao-Yu Wu, Bo Tian, Hui-Ling Zhen, Wen-Rong Sun and Ya Sun. Journal of Modern Optics, 2015

    2015

  26. [33]

    Yersultanova, M

    Z.S. Yersultanova, M. Zhassybayeva, K. Yesmakhanova, G. N ugmanova, R. Myrzakulov. International Journal of Geometric Methods in Mo dern Physics, 13, N1, 1550134 (2016).. [arXiv:1404.2270]

    2016 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Integrable Motion of Two Interacting Curves and Heisenberg Ferromagnetic Equation s, Abstracts of XVIII-th Intern

    Myrzakul Akbota and Myrzakulov Ratbay. Integrable Motion of Two Interacting Curves and Heisenberg Ferromagnetic Equation s, Abstracts of XVIII-th Intern. Conference ”Geometry, Integrability and Q uantiza- tion”, June 3-8, 2016, Bulgaria

    2016

  28. [35]

    Integrable motion of two in- teracting curves, spin systems and the Manakov system

    Myrzakul Akbota and Myrzakulov Ratbay. Integrable motion of two in- teracting curves, spin systems and the Manakov system . International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, 13, N1, 1550134 (2016). [arXiv:1606.06598] 9

    2016 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Darboux transformations and exact soliton solutions of integrable coupled spin syst ems related with the Manakov system , [arXiv:1607.08151]

    Myrzakul Akbota and Myrzakulov Ratbay. Darboux transformations and exact soliton solutions of integrable coupled spin syst ems related with the Manakov system , [arXiv:1607.08151]

    arXiv

  30. [37]

    Integrable geometric flows of interacting curves/surfaces, multilayer spin systems and the vector non- linear Schrodinger equation

    Myrzakul Akbota and Myrzakulov Ratbay. Integrable geometric flows of interacting curves/surfaces, multilayer spin systems and the vector non- linear Schrodinger equation. International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, 13, N1, 1550134 (2016). [arXiv:1608.08553]

    2016 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Notes on Integrable Motion of Two Interacting Curves and Two-layer G eneralized Heisenberg Ferromagnet Equations, [arXiv:1811:12216]

    Myrzakulova Zh., Myrzakul A., Nugmanova G., MyrzakulovR. Notes on Integrable Motion of Two Interacting Curves and Two-layer G eneralized Heisenberg Ferromagnet Equations, [arXiv:1811:12216]

  32. [39]

    Generated Surfaces via Inextensible Flows of Curves in R3

    Hussien R.A., Mohamed S.G. Generated Surfaces via Inextensible Flows of Curves in R3. Journal of Applied Mathematics, v.2016, Article ID 6178961 (2016)

    2016

  33. [40]

    Complex short pulse and coupled complex short pulse equations

    Bao-Feng Feng. Complex short pulse and coupled complex short pulse equations. Physica D 297 (2015) 62-75. [arXiv:1312.6431]

    2015 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Geometric formulation and multi- dark soliton solution to the defocusing complex short pulse equation, [arXiv:1603.00781]

    Feng B-F., Maruno K., Ohta Y. Geometric formulation and multi- dark soliton solution to the defocusing complex short pulse equation, [arXiv:1603.00781]

    arXiv

  35. [42]

    and Ohta Y

    Shen S., Feng B.-F. and Ohta Y. From the real and complex coupled dispersionless equations to the real and complex short puls e equations , Stud. Appl. Math., v.136, 6488 (2016)

    2016

  36. [43]

    Integrable multi-component generalization of a mod- ified short pulse equation

    Matsuno Y. Integrable multi-component generalization of a mod- ified short pulse equation . J. Math. Phys. 57, 111507 (2016). [arXiv:1607.01079]

    2016 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Geometric formulation and soliton solutions of the Myrzaku lov- LXXIII equation and the complex short pulse equation ,

    Bekova G., Yesmakhanova K., Shaikhova G., Nugmanova G., Myrza - kulov R. Geometric formulation and soliton solutions of the Myrzaku lov- LXXIII equation and the complex short pulse equation ,

  38. [45]

    C. Qu, J. Song and R. Yao. Multi-Component Integrable Systems and Invariant Curve Flows in Certain Geometries , Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications SIGMA 9 (2013), 001, 19 pages [arXiv:1301.0180]

    2013 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Integrable Motion of Curves, Spin Equation and Camassa-Holm Equation , [arXiv:1907.10910] 10

    Mussatayeva A., Myrzakul T., Nugmanova G., Yesmakhanova K., Myrzakulov R. Integrable Motion of Curves, Spin Equation and Camassa-Holm Equation , [arXiv:1907.10910] 10

    1907 arXiv

  40. [48]

    An integrable semi- discrete Degasperis-Procesi equation, [arXiv:1510.03010]

    Bao-Feng Feng, Ken-ichi Maruno, Yasuhiro Ohta. An integrable semi- discrete Degasperis-Procesi equation, [arXiv:1510.03010]

    arXiv

  41. [49]

    Unfamiliar Aspects of B?acklund Transformations and an Associated Degasperis-Procesi Equation , [arXiv:1710.05539] 11

    Rasin A.G., Schif J. Unfamiliar Aspects of B?acklund Transformations and an Associated Degasperis-Procesi Equation , [arXiv:1710.05539] 11

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.