Progress, Justness and Fairness

Peter H\"ofner; Rob van Glabbeek

Progress, Justness and Fairness

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1810.07414 v2 pith:FMFHGNPY submitted 2018-10-17 cs.LO

Rob van Glabbeek , Peter Höfner This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.LO

keywords fairnessjustnessalternativeapplicationsargueassumptionsclassifyconcept

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments

read the original abstract

Fairness assumptions are a valuable tool when reasoning about systems. In this paper, we classify several fairness properties found in the literature and argue that most of them are too restrictive for many applications. As an alternative we introduce the concept of justness.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Ensuring Liveness Properties of Distributed Systems: Open Problems
cs.LO 2019-08 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

A research agenda for a theory of concurrency that proves liveness properties using justness instead of fairness, because fairness assumptions can yield conclusions that do not hold in reality.

Pith tools