Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 160 references

Analysis of the $C\!P$ structure of the Yukawa coupling between the Higgs boson and tau leptons in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13.6 TeV

T0 review · 1 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-06-28 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read CMS measures the CP mixing angle of the Higgs-tau Yukawa coupling as 7 ± 16 degrees in combined data.

desk verdict CMS updated their H-tau CP mixing measurement with 13.6 TeV data and combined to 7±16°, but the result still hinges on MC modeling of tau decay angles. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.03510 v1 pith:FN7PJKCQ submitted 2026-06-02 hep-ex

CMS Collaboration This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ex
keywords HiggsbosontauleptonsCPmixingangleYukawacouplingproton-protoncollisionsCMSexperimentangularcorrelations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper measures the charge-parity structure of the Yukawa coupling between the Higgs boson and tau leptons in proton-proton collisions at 13.6 TeV. Angular correlations in the decay products of taus from Higgs decays are used to constrain an effective mixing angle that describes any admixture of scalar and pseudoscalar couplings. The new dataset alone yields a value consistent with the Standard Model expectation of zero mixing, and the combination with earlier 13 TeV data produces a tighter constraint that remains consistent with the Standard Model. This approach directly tests whether the Higgs interaction with taus respects CP symmetry.

What carries the argument

The effective CP mixing angle α^{H au au} that parameterizes the admixture of scalar and pseudoscalar couplings in the Higgs-tau Yukawa interaction, extracted by fitting angular correlations between tau decay products.

What would settle it

A statistically significant deviation of the fitted mixing angle from zero in the combined dataset, or a clear mismatch between observed and simulated angular distributions that cannot be explained by background or detector uncertainties.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The analysis determines the CP mixing angle α^{H au au} to be (36^{+33}_{-30})° from 62.4 fb^{-1} of 13.6 TeV data, compared with an expected value of (0 ± 19)° under the Standard Model. When combined with the previous CMS measurement from 138 fb^{-1} at 13 TeV, the mixing angle is (7 ± 16)°, with an expected value of (0 ± 14)°.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes that angular correlations between tau decay products are accurately modeled in simulation and that all relevant backgrounds and detector effects have been correctly accounted for when fitting for the mixing angle.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The combined uncertainty on the mixing angle reaches ±16°.
  • The result remains consistent with a pure scalar coupling under the Standard Model.
  • The measurement sets the current best expected precision on this CP property by any experiment.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same angular-correlation method could be applied to other Higgs decay channels if sufficient statistics become available.
  • Any future deviation from zero would point to CP-violating new physics in the Higgs sector.
  • The result provides a benchmark for theoretical models that extend the Standard Model with additional CP-odd components.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a measurement of the CP-mixing angle α^{Hττ} parameterizing the scalar-pseudoscalar admixture in the Higgs-tau Yukawa coupling. Using 62.4 fb^{-1} of 13.6 TeV pp collision data recorded with CMS, angular correlations in H→ττ decays yield α^{Hττ} = (36^{+33}_{-30})°, consistent with the SM expectation of (0 ± 19)°. Combination with the prior 13 TeV CMS result (138 fb^{-1}) gives (7 ± 16)° (expected (0 ± 14)°), stated to be the most precise CMS result and the best expected precision achieved by any experiment.

Significance. If the modeling assumptions hold, the result supplies the tightest CMS constraint to date on possible CP violation in the Hττ coupling and achieves the best expected precision reported by any experiment. The combined measurement is statistics-limited, so further luminosity would directly improve the bound.

major comments (1)
  1. [Analysis and fit procedure (as described in the body)] The extraction of α^{Hττ} is performed via a fit to angular observables generated from tau decay matrix elements and polarization transfer in simulation. No data-driven constraint or closure test on the accuracy of this modeling (e.g., acoplanarity or decay-plane angle distributions) is reported at a level comparable to the 16° combined uncertainty, which is the dominant systematic risk for the central claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. Below we provide a point-by-point response to the major comment.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Analysis and fit procedure (as described in the body)] The extraction of α^{Hττ} is performed via a fit to angular observables generated from tau decay matrix elements and polarization transfer in simulation. No data-driven constraint or closure test on the accuracy of this modeling (e.g., acoplanarity or decay-plane angle distributions) is reported at a level comparable to the 16° combined uncertainty, which is the dominant systematic risk for the central claim.

    Authors: The tau decay matrix elements and polarization transfer are modeled using the standard TAUOLA and PYTHIA implementations, which have been validated against data in multiple prior CMS publications on Z→ττ and Higgs boson analyses. We agree that an explicit data-driven closure test at the level of the reported precision would strengthen the presentation of the result. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection (with associated figures) describing validation studies of the acoplanarity and decay-plane angle distributions in both simulation and data control regions, including quantitative comparisons. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity in the data-driven extraction of α^{Hττ}

full rationale

The paper extracts the CP mixing angle from a fit to observed angular distributions in H→ττ events using new 13.6 TeV collision data. This is a direct statistical inference from experimental observables under modeling assumptions for decays and backgrounds; the central result does not reduce by the paper's equations or self-citations to a quantity defined by construction from prior inputs. The combination with the earlier 13 TeV CMS result incorporates independent data and does not render the new measurement circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard experimental assumptions about simulation fidelity and background modeling that are not independently verified from the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • α^{Hττ} = 7 ± 16°
    Effective CP mixing angle extracted from the fit to angular correlations in the data.
assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Tau decay angular distributions and detector response are correctly modeled in simulation.
    Required to interpret observed correlations as a constraint on the Yukawa CP structure.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Analysis of the $C\!P$ structure of the Yukawa coupling between the Higgs boson and tau leptons in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13.6 TeV." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FN7PJKCQ

@misc{pith2026260603510,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Analysis of the $C\!P$ structure of the Yukawa coupling between the Higgs boson and tau leptons in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrts$ = 13.6 TeV},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FN7PJKCQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.03510}
}
abstract

This paper presents a measurement of the charge-parity ($C\!P$) structure of the Yukawa coupling between the Higgs boson (H) and tau leptons, using proton-proton collision data at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13.6 TeV recorded with the CMS detector at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 62.4 fb$^{1}$. Angular correlations between the decay products of tau leptons produced in H $\to$ $\tau\tau$ decays are exploited to constrain the effective $C\!P$ mixing angle $\alpha^{\mathrm{H}\tau\tau}$, which parameterizes the admixture of scalar and pseudoscalar couplings. The mixing angle is measured to be $\alpha^{\mathrm{H}\tau\tau}$ = (36$^{+33}_{-30}$)$^\circ$, compared with an expected value of (0 $\pm$ 19)$^\circ$ under the standard model hypothesis. When combined with the previous CMS measurement using data collected at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$, the mixing angle is determined to be (7 $\pm$ 16)$^\circ$, with an expected value of (0 $\pm$ 14)$^\circ$. This result represents the most precise measurement by CMS of the $C\!P$ nature of the Higgs boson coupling to tau leptons, with an expected precision that is the best achieved by any experiment to date.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.03510 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Illustration of the reconstruction of ϕCP. The frame is defined such that the sum of the ⃗P ∗± vectors is zero. The ϕCP angle is reconstructed from ⃗R ∗± ⊥ and⃗P ∗± . The corresponding unit vectors are used to define the angle ϕ ∗ : ϕ ∗ = arccos(Rˆ ∗+ ⊥ · Rˆ ∗− ⊥ ), (5) and the CP-odd triple product correlation O∗ observable: O ∗ = Pˆ ∗− · (Rˆ ∗+ ⊥ × Rˆ ∗− ⊥ ). (6) The acoplanarity angle ϕCP is then defined as: ϕCP … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The post-fit BDT score distributions for the Genuine (left) and Mis-ID (right) cate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. shows the data and background distributions, with the expected scalar and pseu￾doscalar signal templates overlaid, for the most sensitive decay mode combinations (ρρ, πρ, and ρa 3pr 1 ). The distributions highlight the effectiveness of the BDT discriminant in optimizing the signal over background ratio, as well as the CP-sensitivity of the measurement that follows from the visibly different phases of the CP-even and… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Negative log-likelihood scan for the combination of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Negative log-likelihood scan for the combination of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The ϕCP distributions for the ρρ, πρ, µρ, and eρ channels in 13 and 13.6 TeV data, and the ρa 3pr 1 , ρa 1pr 1 + a 1pr 1 a 1pr 1 , µa 3pr 1 , and ea3pr 1 channels in 13.6 TeV data, are weighed by A S/(S + B) and combined. The upper plot includes only the 13.6 TeV data,…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Observed scan of −2∆ ln L for µ against α Hτ τ for the combination of the 13 and 13.6 TeV measurements. The red marker indicates the SM prediction, and the white marker indicates the best fit to the data. -2 -1 0 1 2 -2 -1 0 1 2 = 1 200 fb 1 CMS (13 and 13.6 TeV) 68.3%…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Observed scan of −2∆ ln L for the reduced CP-odd (κeτ ) coupling against the re￾duced CP-even (κτ ) coupling for the combination of the 13 and 13.6 TeV measurements. The red marker indicates the SM prediction, and the white markers indicate the best fits to the data […
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Projections of the expected likelihood scans to an integrated luminosity of 3 ab [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

160 extracted references · 155 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Englert and R

    F. Englert and R. Brout, “Broken symmetry and the mass of gauge vector mesons”, Phys. Rev. Lett.13(1964) 321,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.321

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.13.321 1964

  2. [2]

    Broken symmetries, massless particles and gauge fields

    P . W. Higgs, “Broken symmetries, massless particles and gauge fields”,Phys. Lett.12 (1964) 132,doi:10.1016/0031-9163(64)91136-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0031-9163(64)91136-9 1964

  3. [3]

    Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons

    P . W. Higgs, “Broken symmetries and the masses of gauge bosons”,Phys. Rev. Lett.13 (1964) 508,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.508

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.13.508 1964

  4. [4]

    Global conservation laws and massless particles

    G. S. Guralnik, C. R. Hagen, and T. W. B. Kibble, “Global conservation laws and massless particles”,Phys. Rev. Lett.13(1964) 585,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.585

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.13.585 1964

  5. [5]

    Spontaneous symmetry breakdown without massless bosons

    P . W. Higgs, “Spontaneous symmetry breakdown without massless bosons”,Phys. Rev. 145(1966) 1156,doi:10.1103/PhysRev.145.1156

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.145.1156 1966

  6. [6]

    Symmetry breaking in non-abelian gauge theories

    T. W. B. Kibble, “Symmetry breaking in non-abelian gauge theories”,Phys. Rev.155 (1967) 1554,doi:10.1103/PhysRev.155.1554

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.155.1554 1967

  7. [7]

    Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC”,Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 1, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020,arXiv:1207.7214

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020 2012

  8. [8]

    Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC”,Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 30, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021,arXiv:1207.7235

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021 2012

Show all 160 references
  1. [9]

    Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at √s= 7 and 8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at √s= 7 and 8 TeV”,JHEP06(2013) 081, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2013)081,arXiv:1303.4571. 24

    2013 doi arXiv

  2. [10]

    Combined measurements and interpretations of Higgs boson production and decay in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Combined measurements and interpretations of Higgs boson production and decay in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV”, 2026. arXiv:2602.18611. Submitted toRep. Prog. Phys

    2026

  3. [11]

    Interpretations of the ATLAS measurements of Higgs boson production and decay rates and differential cross-sections in pp collisions at√s=13 TeV

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Interpretations of the ATLAS measurements of Higgs boson production and decay rates and differential cross-sections in pp collisions at√s=13 TeV”,JHEP11(2024) 97,doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2024)097, arXiv:2402.05742

    2024 doi

  4. [12]

    Violation ofCPinvariance,Casymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe

    A. D. Sakharov, “Violation ofCPinvariance,Casymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe”,Pisma Zh. Eksp. T eor. Fiz.5(1967) 32, doi:10.1070/PU1991v034n05ABEH002497

    1967 doi

  5. [13]

    Standard model CP violation and baryon asymmetry. Part 2: Finite temperature

    M. B. Gavela et al., “Standard model CP violation and baryon asymmetry. Part 2: Finite temperature”,Nucl. Phys. B430(1994) 382, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)00410-2,arXiv:hep-ph/9406289

    1994 doi arXiv

  6. [14]

    Impact of new experimental data on the C2HDM: the strong interdependence between LHC Higgs data and the electron EDM

    T. Biekotter et al., “Impact of new experimental data on the C2HDM: the strong interdependence between LHC Higgs data and the electron EDM”,JHEP05(2024) 127, doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2024)127,arXiv:2403.02425

    2024 doi

  7. [15]

    Exploring theCP-violating NMSSM: EDM constraints and phenomenology

    S. F. King, M. M ¨uhlleitner, R. Nevzorov, and K. Walz, “Exploring theCP-violating NMSSM: EDM constraints and phenomenology”,Nucl. Phys. B901(2015) 526, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2015.11.003,arXiv:1508.03255

    2015 doi arXiv

  8. [16]

    On the mass and spin-parity of the Higgs boson candidate via its decays to Z boson pairs

    CMS Collaboration, “On the mass and spin-parity of the Higgs boson candidate via its decays to Z boson pairs”,Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013) 081803, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.081803,arXiv:1212.6639

    2013 doi arXiv

  9. [17]

    Measurement of the properties of a Higgs boson in the four-lepton final state

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the properties of a Higgs boson in the four-lepton final state”,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 092007,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.092007, arXiv:1312.5353

    2014 doi arXiv

  10. [18]

    Constraints on the spin-parity and anomalous HVV couplings of the Higgs boson in proton collisions at 7 and 8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Constraints on the spin-parity and anomalous HVV couplings of the Higgs boson in proton collisions at 7 and 8 TeV”,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 012004, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.012004,arXiv:1411.3441

    2015 doi arXiv

  11. [19]

    Combined search for anomalous pseudoscalar HVV couplings in VH(H→b b) production and H→VV decay

    CMS Collaboration, “Combined search for anomalous pseudoscalar HVV couplings in VH(H→b b) production and H→VV decay”,Phys. Lett. B759(2016) 672, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.06.004,arXiv:1602.04305

    2016 doi arXiv

  12. [20]

    Constraints on anomalous Higgs boson couplings using production and decay information in the four-lepton final state

    CMS Collaboration, “Constraints on anomalous Higgs boson couplings using production and decay information in the four-lepton final state”,Phys. Lett. B775 (2017) 1,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.10.021,arXiv:1707.00541

    2017 doi arXiv

  13. [21]

    Constraints on anomalous HVV couplings from the production of Higgs bosons decaying toτlepton pairs

    CMS Collaboration, “Constraints on anomalous HVV couplings from the production of Higgs bosons decaying toτlepton pairs”,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 112002, doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.112002,arXiv:1903.06973

    2019 doi

  14. [22]

    Constraints on anomalous Higgs boson couplings to vector bosons and fermions in its production and decay using the four-lepton final state

    CMS Collaboration, “Constraints on anomalous Higgs boson couplings to vector bosons and fermions in its production and decay using the four-lepton final state”,Phys. Rev. D 104(2021) 052004,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.052004,arXiv:2104.12152. References 25

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    Evidence for the spin-0 nature of the Higgs boson using ATLAS data

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Evidence for the spin-0 nature of the Higgs boson using ATLAS data”,Phys. Lett. B726(2013) 120,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.08.026, arXiv:1307.1432

    2013 doi arXiv

  16. [24]

    Study of the spin and parity of the Higgs boson in diboson decays with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Study of the spin and parity of the Higgs boson in diboson decays with the ATLAS detector”,Eur. Phys. J. C75(2015) 476, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3685-1,arXiv:1506.05669. [Erratum: doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-3934-y]

    2015 doi arXiv

  17. [25]

    Test ofCPinvariance in vector-boson fusion production of the Higgs boson using the optimal observable method in the ditau decay channel with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Test ofCPinvariance in vector-boson fusion production of the Higgs boson using the optimal observable method in the ditau decay channel with the ATLAS detector”,Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016) 658, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4499-5,arXiv:1602.04516

    2016 doi arXiv

  18. [26]

    Measurement of the Higgs boson coupling properties in the H→ZZ ∗ →4ℓdecay channel at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Measurement of the Higgs boson coupling properties in the H→ZZ ∗ →4ℓdecay channel at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,JHEP03 (2018) 095,doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2018)095,arXiv:1712.02304

    2018 doi arXiv

  19. [27]

    Measurements of Higgs boson properties in the diphoton decay channel with 36 fb −1 of pp collision data at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Measurements of Higgs boson properties in the diphoton decay channel with 36 fb −1 of pp collision data at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”, Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 052005,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.052005, arXiv:1802.04146

    2018 doi arXiv

  20. [28]

    Constraining anomalous Higgs boson couplings to the heavy-flavor fermions using matrix element techniques

    A. V . Gritsan, R. R¨ontsch, M. Schulze, and M. Xiao, “Constraining anomalous Higgs boson couplings to the heavy-flavor fermions using matrix element techniques”,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 055023,doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.055023, arXiv:1606.03107

    2016 doi

  21. [29]

    Prospects for measuring quark polarization and spin correlations inb bandc csamples at the LHC

    Y. Kats and D. Uzan, “Prospects for measuring quark polarization and spin correlations inb bandc csamples at the LHC”,JHEP03(2024) 063, doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2024)063,arXiv:2311.08226

    2024 doi

  22. [30]

    Constraints on anomalous Higgs boson couplings to vector bosons and fermions from the production of Higgs bosons using theττfinal state

    CMS Collaboration, “Constraints on anomalous Higgs boson couplings to vector bosons and fermions from the production of Higgs bosons using theττfinal state”,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 032013,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.032013,arXiv:2205.05120

    2023 doi

  23. [31]

    Constraints on anomalous Higgs boson couplings from its production and decay using the WW channel in proton–proton collisions at√s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Constraints on anomalous Higgs boson couplings from its production and decay using the WW channel in proton–proton collisions at√s=13 TeV”,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 779, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12925-0,arXiv:2403.00657

    2024 doi

  24. [32]

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Measurements of Higgs boson production via gluon–gluon fusion and vector-boson fusion usingH→WW ∗ →ℓνℓνdecays in pp collisions with the ATLAS detector and their effective field theory interpretations”,Eur. Phys. J. C85 (2025) 1403,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-...

    2025 doi

  25. [33]

    Measurements of t tH production and theCPstructure of the Yukawa interaction between the Higgs boson and top quark in the diphoton decay channel

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurements of t tH production and theCPstructure of the Yukawa interaction between the Higgs boson and top quark in the diphoton decay channel”,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 061801, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.061801,arXiv:2003.10866

    2020 doi

  26. [34]

    CPproperties of Higgs boson interactions with top quarks in the ttH and tH processes using H→γγwith the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “CPproperties of Higgs boson interactions with top quarks in the ttH and tH processes using H→γγwith the ATLAS detector”,Phys. Rev. Lett.125 (2020) 061802,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.061802,arXiv:2004.04545. 26

    2020 doi

  27. [35]

    Search forCPviolation in ttH and tH production in multilepton channels in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search forCPviolation in ttH and tH production in multilepton channels in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV”,JHEP07(2023) 092, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2023)092,arXiv:2208.02686

    2023 doi

  28. [36]

    Probing theCPnature of the top-Higgs Yukawa coupling in t tH and ttH events with H→b b decays using the ATLAS detector at the LHC

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Probing theCPnature of the top-Higgs Yukawa coupling in t tH and ttH events with H→b b decays using the ATLAS detector at the LHC”,Phys. Lett. B 849(2024) 138469,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138469,arXiv:2303.05974

    2024 doi

  29. [37]

    Measurement of the t tH and tH production rates in the H→b b decay channel using proton-proton collision data at √s= 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the t tH and tH production rates in the H→b b decay channel using proton-proton collision data at √s= 13 TeV”,JHEP02(2025) 097, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2025)097,arXiv:2407.10896

    2025 doi

  30. [38]

    Measurement of the Higgs boson production in association with top quarks in multilepton final states inppcollisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Measurement of the Higgs boson production in association with top quarks in multilepton final states inppcollisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”, 2025.arXiv:2510.23755. Submitted toJHEP

    2025

  31. [39]

    An improved bound on the electron’s electric dipole moment

    T. Roussy et al., “An improved bound on the electron’s electric dipole moment”, Science381(2023) 46,doi:10.1126/science.adg4084,arXiv:2212.11841

    2023 doi

  32. [40]

    Constraining the CP structure of Higgs-fermion couplings with a global LHC fit, the electron EDM and baryogenesis

    H. Bahl et al., “Constraining the CP structure of Higgs-fermion couplings with a global LHC fit, the electron EDM and baryogenesis”,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 604, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10528-1,arXiv:2202.11753

    2022 doi

  33. [41]

    Analysis of the CP structure of the Yukawa coupling between the Higgs boson andτleptons in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Analysis of the CP structure of the Yukawa coupling between the Higgs boson andτleptons in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JHEP06(2022) 012,doi:10.1007/jhep06(2022)012,arXiv:2110.04836

    2022 doi

  34. [42]

    Measurement of the CP properties of Higgs boson interactions withτ-leptons with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Measurement of the CP properties of Higgs boson interactions withτ-leptons with the ATLAS detector”,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 563, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11583-y,arXiv:2212.05833

    2023 doi

  35. [43]

    HEPData record for this analysis

    “HEPData record for this analysis”, 2026.doi:10.17182/hepdata.172938

    2026 doi

  36. [44]

    The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”,JINST3(2008) S08004, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08004

    2008 doi

  37. [45]

    Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3

    CMS Collaboration, “Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3”, JINST19(2024) P05064,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/05/P05064, arXiv:2309.05466

    2024 doi

  38. [46]

    Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JINST15(2020) P10017, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/10/P10017,arXiv:2006.10165

    2020 doi

  39. [47]

    The CMS trigger system

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS trigger system”,JINST12(2017) P01020, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/P01020,arXiv:1609.02366

    2017 doi arXiv

  40. [48]

    Performance of the CMS high-level trigger during LHC Run 2

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS high-level trigger during LHC Run 2”, JINST19(2024) P11021,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/11/P11021, arXiv:2410.17038

    2024 doi

  41. [49]

    Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”,JINST16(2021) P05014, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/05/P05014,arXiv:2012.06888. References 27

    2021 doi

  42. [50]

    Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JINST13(2018) P06015, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/06/P06015,arXiv:1804.04528

    2018 doi arXiv

  43. [51]

    Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker

    CMS Collaboration, “Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker”,JINST9(2014) P10009, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/10/P10009,arXiv:1405.6569

    2014 doi arXiv

  44. [52]

    Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector

    CMS Collaboration, “Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector”,JINST12(2017) P10003,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/P10003, arXiv:1706.04965

    2017 doi arXiv

  45. [53]

    Deterministic annealing for clustering, compression, classification, regression, and related optimization problems

    K. Rose, “Deterministic annealing for clustering, compression, classification, regression, and related optimization problems”,Proc. IEEE86(1998) 2210, doi:10.1109/5.726788

    1998 doi

  46. [54]

    Adaptive vertex fitting

    W. Waltenberger, R. Fr¨uhwirth, and P . Vanlaer, “Adaptive vertex fitting”,J. Phys. G: Nuc. Part. Phys.34(2007) N343,doi:10.1088/0954-3899/34/12/n01

    2007 doi

  47. [55]

    Technical proposal for the Phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid

    CMS Collaboration, “Technical proposal for the Phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid”, CMS Technical Proposal CERN-LHCC-2015-010, CMS-TDR-15-02, 2015

    2015

  48. [56]

    The anti-kT jet clustering algorithm

    M. Cacciari, G. P . Salam, and G. Soyez, “The anti-kT jet clustering algorithm”,JHEP04 (2008) 063,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/063,arXiv:0802.1189

    2008 doi arXiv

  49. [57]

    FastJet user manual

    M. Cacciari, G. P . Salam, and G. Soyez, “FastJet user manual”,Eur. Phys. J. C72(2012) 1896,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1896-2,arXiv:1111.6097

    2012 doi arXiv

  50. [58]

    Pileup mitigation at CMS in 13 TeV data

    CMS Collaboration, “Pileup mitigation at CMS in 13 TeV data”,JINST15(2020) P09018,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/09/p09018,arXiv:2003.00503

    2020 doi

  51. [59]

    Pileup per particle identification

    D. Bertolini, P . Harris, M. Low, and N. Tran, “Pileup per particle identification”,JHEP 10(2014) 059,doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2014)059,arXiv:1407.6013

    2014 doi arXiv

  52. [60]

    Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV”,JINST12(2017) P02014, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/02/P02014,arXiv:1607.03663

    2017 doi arXiv

  53. [61]

    Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV using the CMS detector

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV using the CMS detector”,JINST14(2019) P07004,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/14/07/P07004,arXiv:1903.06078

    2019 doi arXiv

  54. [62]

    ECAL 2016 refined calibration and Run2 summary plots

    CMS Collaboration, “ECAL 2016 refined calibration and Run2 summary plots”, CMS Detector Performance Summary CMS-DP-2020-021, 2020

    2016

  55. [63]

    Performance of reconstruction and identification ofτleptons decaying to hadrons andν τ in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of reconstruction and identification ofτleptons decaying to hadrons andν τ in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JINST13(2018) P10005, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/10/P10005,arXiv:1809.02816

    2018 doi arXiv

  56. [64]

    Identification of hadronic tau lepton decays using a deep neural network

    CMS Collaboration, “Identification of hadronic tau lepton decays using a deep neural network”,JINST17(2022) P07023,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/17/07/P07023, arXiv:2201.08458

    2022 doi

  57. [65]

    Identification of tau leptons using a convolutional neural network with domain adaptation

    CMS Collaboration, “Identification of tau leptons using a convolutional neural network with domain adaptation”,JINST20(2025) P12032, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/20/12/P12032,arXiv:2511.05468. 28

    2025 doi

  58. [66]

    Review of particle physics

    Particle Data Group Collaboration, “Review of particle physics”,Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 030001,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001

    2024 doi

  59. [67]

    Jet tagging via particle clouds

    H. Qu and L. Gouskos, “Jet tagging via particle clouds”,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 056019, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.056019,arXiv:1902.08570

    2020 doi

  60. [68]

    Identification of hadronic tau decay channels using multivariate analysis (MVA decay mode)

    CMS Collaboration, “Identification of hadronic tau decay channels using multivariate analysis (MVA decay mode)”, CMS Detector Performance Summary CMS-DP-2020-041, 2020

    2020

  61. [69]

    Determination of the HiggsCP-mixing angle in the tau decay channels

    S. Berge, W. Bernreuther, and S. Kirchner, “Determination of the HiggsCP-mixing angle in the tau decay channels”,Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc.273-275(2016) 841, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2015.09.129,arXiv:1410.6362

    2016 doi arXiv

  62. [70]

    How to pin down the CP quantum numbers of a Higgs boson in its tau decays at the LHC

    S. Berge, W. Bernreuther, B. Niepelt, and H. Spiesberger, “How to pin down the CP quantum numbers of a Higgs boson in its tau decays at the LHC”,Phys. Rev. D84 (2011) 116003,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.116003,arXiv:1108.0670

    2011 doi arXiv

  63. [71]

    Prospects of measuring the parity of Higgs particles

    M. Kramer, J. H. Kuhn, M. L. Stong, and P . M. Zerwas, “Prospects of measuring the parity of Higgs particles”,Z. Phys. C64(1994) 21,doi:10.1007/BF01557231, arXiv:hep-ph/9404280

    1994 doi arXiv

  64. [72]

    Measuring the Higgs boson’s parity usingτ→ρν

    G. R. Bower, T. Pierzchala, Z. Was, and M. Worek, “Measuring the Higgs boson’s parity usingτ→ρν”,Phys. Lett. B543(2002) 227, doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(02)02445-0,arXiv:hep-ph/0204292

    2002 doi arXiv

  65. [73]

    Measuring the Higgs boson parity at a linear collider usingτimpact parameter andτ→ρνdecay

    K. Desch, Z. Was, and M. Worek, “Measuring the Higgs boson parity at a linear collider usingτimpact parameter andτ→ρνdecay”,Eur. Phys. J. C29(2003) 491, doi:10.1140/epjc/s2003-01231-4,arXiv:hep-ph/0302046

    2003 doi arXiv

  66. [74]

    Probing the CP nature of the Higgs boson at linear colliders with tau spin correlations: The case of mixed scalar - pseudoscalar couplings

    K. Desch, A. Imhof, Z. Was, and M. Worek, “Probing the CP nature of the Higgs boson at linear colliders with tau spin correlations: The case of mixed scalar - pseudoscalar couplings”,Phys. Lett. B579(2004) 157,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2003.10.074, arXiv:hep-ph/0307331

    2004 doi arXiv

  67. [75]

    Determining the CP parity of Higgs bosons at the LHC in their tau decay channels

    S. Berge, W. Bernreuther, and J. Ziethe, “Determining the CP parity of Higgs bosons at the LHC in their tau decay channels”,Phys. Rev. Lett.100(2008) 171605, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.171605,arXiv:0801.2297

    2008 doi arXiv

  68. [76]

    Determining the CP parity of Higgs bosons at the LHC in the tau to 1-prong decay channels

    S. Berge and W. Bernreuther, “Determining the CP parity of Higgs bosons at the LHC in the tau to 1-prong decay channels”,Phys. Lett. B671(2009) 470, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.12.065,arXiv:0812.1910

    2009 doi arXiv

  69. [77]

    Higgs CP properties using theτdecay modes at the ILC

    S. Berge, W. Bernreuther, and H. Spiesberger, “Higgs CP properties using theτdecay modes at the ILC”,Phys. Lett. B727(2013) 488, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.11.006,arXiv:1308.2674

    2013 doi arXiv

  70. [78]

    Determination of the Higgs CP-mixing angle in the tau decay channels at the LHC including the Drell–Yan background

    S. Berge, W. Bernreuther, and S. Kirchner, “Determination of the Higgs CP-mixing angle in the tau decay channels at the LHC including the Drell–Yan background”,Eur. Phys. J. C74(2014) 3164,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3164-0,arXiv:1408.0798

    2014 doi arXiv

  71. [79]

    Prospects of constraining the Higgs boson’s CP nature in the tau decay channel at the LHC

    S. Berge, W. Bernreuther, and S. Kirchner, “Prospects of constraining the Higgs boson’s CP nature in the tau decay channel at the LHC”,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 096012, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.096012,arXiv:1510.03850. References 29

    2015 doi arXiv

  72. [80]

    Potential for optimizing the Higgs boson CP measurement in H→ττdecays at the LHC including machine learning techniques

    R. J ´ozefowicz, E. Richter-Was, and Z. Was, “Potential for optimizing the Higgs boson CP measurement in H→ττdecays at the LHC including machine learning techniques”, Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 093001,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.093001, arXiv:1608.02609

    2016 doi arXiv

  73. [81]

    Monte Carlo, fitting and machine learning for tau leptons

    V . Cherepanov, E. Richter-Was, and Z. Was, “Monte Carlo, fitting and machine learning for tau leptons”,SciPost Phys. Proc.1(2019) 018, doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysProc.1.018,arXiv:1811.03969

    2019 doi arXiv

  74. [82]

    Methodologies to measure theCPstructure of the Higgs Yukawa coupling to tau leptons

    A. Cardini, “Methodologies to measure theCPstructure of the Higgs Yukawa coupling to tau leptons”,Universe8(2022) 256,doi:10.3390/universe8050256

    2022 doi

  75. [83]

    Kinematic reconstruction of Z/H→ττdecay in proton-proton collisions

    V . Cherepanov and A. Zotz, “Kinematic reconstruction of Z/H→ττdecay in proton-proton collisions”, 2018.arXiv:1805.06988

    2018 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Efficient tau-pair invariant mass reconstruction with simplified matrix element techniques

    A. Kalinowski and W. Matyszkiewicz, “Efficient tau-pair invariant mass reconstruction with simplified matrix element techniques”,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A1086(2026) 171318, doi:10.1016/j.nima.2026.171318,arXiv:2509.26069

    2026 doi

  77. [85]

    The optimal method for the measurement of tau polarization

    M. Davier, L. Duflot, F. Le Diberder, and A. Rouge, “The optimal method for the measurement of tau polarization”,Phys. Lett. B306(1993) 411, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(93)90101-M

    1993 doi

  78. [86]

    The polarimeter vector forτ→3πντdecays

    V . Cherepanov and C. Veelken, “The polarimeter vector forτ→3πντdecays”,Comput. Phys. Commun.299(2024) 109153,doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2024.109153, arXiv:2311.10490

    2024 doi

  79. [87]

    TAUOLA: A library of Monte Carlo programs to simulate decays of polarizedτleptons

    S. Jadach, J. H. Kuhn, and Z. Wa ¸s, “TAUOLA: A library of Monte Carlo programs to simulate decays of polarizedτleptons”,Comput. Phys. Commun.64(1990) 275, doi:10.1016/0010-4655(91)90038-M

    1990 doi

  80. [88]

    Theτdecay library TAUOLA, update with exact O(α) QED corrections inτ→µ(e)ν νdecay modes

    M. Jezabek, Z. Wa ¸s, S. Jadach, and J. H. Kuhn, “Theτdecay library TAUOLA, update with exact O(α) QED corrections inτ→µ(e)ν νdecay modes”,Comput. Phys. Commun. 70(1992) 69,doi:10.1016/0010-4655(92)90092-D

    1992 doi

  81. [89]

    Theτdecay library TAUOLA: Version 2.4

    S. Jadach, Z. Wa ¸s, R. Decker, and J. H. Kuhn, “Theτdecay library TAUOLA: Version 2.4”,Comput. Phys. Commun.76(1993) 361,doi:10.1016/0010-4655(93)90061-G

    1993 doi

  82. [90]

    Hadronic structure in the decayτ→ν τ π −π0π0 and the sign of theν τ helicity

    CLEO Collaboration, “Hadronic structure in the decayτ→ν τ π −π0π0 and the sign of theν τ helicity”,Phys. Rev. D61(2000) 012002, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.61.012002,arXiv:hep-ex/9902022

    2000 doi arXiv

  83. [91]

    A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms

    P . Nason, “A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms”,JHEP11(2004) 040,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146

    2004 doi arXiv

  84. [92]

    Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method

    S. Frixione, P . Nason, and C. Oleari, “Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method”,JHEP11(2007) 070, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070,arXiv:0709.2092

    2007 doi arXiv

  85. [93]

    A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX

    S. Alioli, P . Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re, “A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX”,JHEP06(2010) 043,doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2010)043,arXiv:1002.2581. 30

    2010 doi arXiv

  86. [94]

    NLO Higgs boson production via vector-boson fusion matched with shower in POWHEG

    P . Nason and C. Oleari, “NLO Higgs boson production via vector-boson fusion matched with shower in POWHEG”,JHEP02(2010) 037,doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2010)037, arXiv:0911.5299

    2010 doi arXiv

  87. [95]

    On the treatment of resonances in next-to-leading order calculations matched to a parton shower

    T. Je ˇzo and P . Nason, “On the treatment of resonances in next-to-leading order calculations matched to a parton shower”,JHEP12(2015) 065, doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2015)065,arXiv:1509.09071

    2015 doi arXiv

  88. [96]

    NLO QCD+EW predictions for HV and HV+jet production including parton-shower effects

    F. Granata, J. M. Lindert, C. Oleari, and S. Pozzorini, “NLO QCD+EW predictions for HV and HV+jet production including parton-shower effects”,JHEP09(2017) 012, doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2017)012,arXiv:1706.03522

    2017 doi arXiv

  89. [97]

    An interface between the POWHEG BOX and MadGraph5 aMC@NLO

    P . Nason, C. Oleari, M. Rocco, and M. Zaro, “An interface between the POWHEG BOX and MadGraph5 aMC@NLO”,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 985, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08559-7,arXiv:2008.06364

    2020 doi

  90. [98]

    Higgs boson production at the LHC: transverse momentum resummation effects in theH→γγ,H→WW→lνlν andH→ZZ→4ldecay modes

    D. de Florian, G. Ferrera, M. Grazzini, and D. Tommasini, “Higgs boson production at the LHC: transverse momentum resummation effects in theH→γγ,H→WW→lνlν andH→ZZ→4ldecay modes”,JHEP06(2012) 132, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2012)132,arXiv:1203.6321

    2012 doi arXiv

  91. [99]

    Radiative corrections to higgs boson production

    S. Dawson, “Radiative corrections to higgs boson production”,Nucl. Phys. B359(1991) 283,doi:10.1016/0550-3213(91)90061-2

    1991 doi

  92. [100]

    Production of Higgs bosons in proton colliders. QCD corrections

    A. Djouadi, M. Spira, and P . M. Zerwas, “Production of Higgs bosons in proton colliders. QCD corrections”,Phys. Lett. B264(1991) 440, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(91)90375-Z

    1991 doi

  93. [101]

    QCD corrections to Higgs-boson production at proton-proton colliders

    D. Graudenz, M. Spira, and P . M. Zerwas, “QCD corrections to Higgs-boson production at proton-proton colliders”,Phys. Rev. Lett.70(1993) 1372, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1372

    1993 doi

  94. [102]

    Higgs boson production at the LHC

    M. Spira, A. Djouadi, D. Graudenz, and P . M. Zerwas, “Higgs boson production at the LHC”,Nucl. Phys. B453(1995) 17,doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00379-7, arXiv:hep-ph/9504378

    1995 doi arXiv

  95. [103]

    Higgs boson production at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD

    C. Anastasiou and K. Melnikov, “Higgs boson production at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD”,Nucl. Phys. B646(2002) 220,doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(02)00837-4, arXiv:hep-ph/0207004

    2002 doi arXiv

  96. [104]

    Next-to-next-to-leading order Higgs production at hadron colliders

    R. V . Harlander and W. B. Kilgore, “Next-to-next-to-leading order Higgs production at hadron colliders”,Phys. Rev. Lett.88(2002) 201801, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.201801,arXiv:hep-ph/0201206

    2002 doi arXiv

  97. [105]

    NNLO corrections to the total cross-section for Higgs boson production in hadron hadron collisions

    V . Ravindran, J. Smith, and W. L. van Neerven, “NNLO corrections to the total cross-section for Higgs boson production in hadron hadron collisions”,Nucl. Phys. B 665(2003) 325,doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(03)00457-7, arXiv:hep-ph/0302135

    2003 doi arXiv

  98. [106]

    Two loop light fermion contribution to Higgs production and decays

    U. Aglietti, R. Bonciani, G. Degrassi, and A. Vicini, “Two loop light fermion contribution to Higgs production and decays”,Phys. Lett. B595(2004) 432, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.06.063,arXiv:hep-ph/0404071. References 31

    2004 doi arXiv

  99. [107]

    NLO electroweak corrections to Higgs boson production at hadron colliders

    S. Actis, G. Passarino, C. Sturm, and S. Uccirati, “NLO electroweak corrections to Higgs boson production at hadron colliders”,Phys. Lett. B670(2008) 12, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.10.018,arXiv:0809.1301

    2008 doi arXiv

  100. [108]

    NNLO Computational Techniques: The CasesH→γγandH→gg

    S. Actis, G. Passarino, C. Sturm, and S. Uccirati, “NNLO Computational Techniques: The CasesH→γγandH→gg”,Nucl. Phys. B811(2009) 182, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2008.11.024,arXiv:0809.3667

    2009 doi arXiv

  101. [109]

    Mixed QCD-electroweak corrections to Higgs boson production in gluon fusion

    C. Anastasiou, R. Boughezal, and F. Petriello, “Mixed QCD-electroweak corrections to Higgs boson production in gluon fusion”,JHEP04(2009) 003, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/04/003,arXiv:0811.3458

    2009 doi arXiv

  102. [110]

    Top mass effects in Higgs production at next-to-next-to-leading order QCD: Virtual corrections

    R. V . Harlander and K. J. Ozeren, “Top mass effects in Higgs production at next-to-next-to-leading order QCD: Virtual corrections”,Phys. Lett. B679(2009) 467, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.08.012,arXiv:0907.2997

    2009 doi arXiv

  103. [111]

    Finite top mass effects for hadronic Higgs production at next-to-next-to-leading order

    R. V . Harlander and K. J. Ozeren, “Finite top mass effects for hadronic Higgs production at next-to-next-to-leading order”,JHEP11(2009) 088, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/11/088,arXiv:0909.3420

    2009 doi arXiv

  104. [112]

    Finite top quark mass effects in NNLO Higgs boson production at LHC

    A. Pak, M. Rogal, and M. Steinhauser, “Finite top quark mass effects in NNLO Higgs boson production at LHC”,JHEP02(2010) 025,doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2010)025, arXiv:0911.4662

    2010 doi arXiv

  105. [113]

    Higgs production in gluon fusion at next-to-next-to-leading order QCD for finite top mass

    R. V . Harlander, H. Mantler, S. Marzani, and K. J. Ozeren, “Higgs production in gluon fusion at next-to-next-to-leading order QCD for finite top mass”,Eur. Phys. J. C66 (2010) 359,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1258-x,arXiv:0912.2104

    2010 doi arXiv

  106. [114]

    Higgs boson gluon–fusion production at threshold in N 3LO QCD

    C. Anastasiou et al., “Higgs boson gluon–fusion production at threshold in N 3LO QCD”,Phys. Lett. B737(2014) 325,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2014.08.067, arXiv:1403.4616

    2014 doi arXiv

  107. [115]

    Higgs boson gluon–fusion production beyond threshold in N 3LO QCD

    C. Anastasiou et al., “Higgs boson gluon–fusion production beyond threshold in N 3LO QCD”,JHEP03(2015) 091,doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2015)091,arXiv:1411.3584

    2015 doi arXiv

  108. [116]

    Higgs boson gluon-fusion production in QCD at three loops

    C. Anastasiou et al., “Higgs boson gluon-fusion production in QCD at three loops”, Phys. Rev. Lett.114(2015) 212001,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.212001, arXiv:1503.06056

    2015 doi arXiv

  109. [117]

    Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 4. Deciphering the nature of the Higgs sector

    LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, “Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 4. Deciphering the nature of the Higgs sector”,CERN Y ellow Rep. Monogr.2(2017) 1, doi:10.23731/CYRM-2017-002,arXiv:1610.07922

    2017 doi arXiv

  110. [118]

    Ad interim recommendations for the Higgs boson production cross sections at √s=13.6 TeV

    A. Karlberg et al., “Ad interim recommendations for the Higgs boson production cross sections at √s=13.6 TeV”, 2024.arXiv:2402.09955. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2402.09955

    2024 doi

  111. [119]

    Strong and electroweak corrections to the production of Higgs + 2jets via weak interactions at the LHC

    M. Ciccolini, A. Denner, and S. Dittmaier, “Strong and electroweak corrections to the production of Higgs + 2jets via weak interactions at the LHC”,Phys. Rev. Lett.99(2007) 161803,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.161803,arXiv:0707.0381

    2007 doi arXiv

  112. [120]

    Electroweak and QCD corrections to Higgs production via vector-boson fusion at the LHC

    M. Ciccolini, A. Denner, and S. Dittmaier, “Electroweak and QCD corrections to Higgs production via vector-boson fusion at the LHC”,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 013002, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.013002,arXiv:0710.4749. 32

    2008 doi arXiv

  113. [121]

    HAWK 2.0: A Monte Carlo program for Higgs production in vector-boson fusion and Higgs strahlung at hadron colliders

    A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, S. Kallweit, and A. M ¨uck, “HAWK 2.0: A Monte Carlo program for Higgs production in vector-boson fusion and Higgs strahlung at hadron colliders”, Comput. Phys. Commun.195(2015) 161,doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.04.021, arXiv:1412.5390

    2015 doi arXiv

  114. [122]

    Fully differential vector-boson-fusion Higgs production at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order

    M. Cacciari et al., “Fully differential vector-boson-fusion Higgs production at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order”,Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 082002, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.082002,arXiv:1506.02660. [Erratum: doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.139901]

    2015 doi arXiv

  115. [123]

    NNLO QCD corrections to the Higgs-strahlung processes at hadron colliders

    O. Brein, A. Djouadi, and R. Harlander, “NNLO QCD corrections to the Higgs-strahlung processes at hadron colliders”,Phys. Lett. B579(2004) 149, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2003.10.112,arXiv:hep-ph/0307206

    2004 doi arXiv

  116. [124]

    Electroweak corrections to Higgs-strahlung off W/Z bosons at the Tevatron and the LHC with HAWK

    A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, S. Kallweit, and A. Muck, “Electroweak corrections to Higgs-strahlung off W/Z bosons at the Tevatron and the LHC with HAWK”,JHEP03 (2012) 075,doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2012)075,arXiv:1112.5142

    2012 doi arXiv

  117. [125]

    vh@nnlo–Higgs strahlung at hadron colliders

    O. Brein, R. V . Harlander, and T. J. E. Zirke, “vh@nnlo–Higgs strahlung at hadron colliders”,Comput. Phys. Commun.184(2013) 998, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2012.11.002,arXiv:1210.5347

    2013 doi arXiv

  118. [126]

    Gluon-induced Higgs-strahlung at next-to-leading order QCD

    L. Altenkamp et al., “Gluon-induced Higgs-strahlung at next-to-leading order QCD”, JHEP02(2013) 078,doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2013)078,arXiv:1211.5015

    2013 doi arXiv

  119. [127]

    Higgs strahlung at the Large Hadron Collider in the 2-Higgs-doublet model

    R. V . Harlander, S. Liebler, and T. Zirke, “Higgs strahlung at the Large Hadron Collider in the 2-Higgs-doublet model”,JHEP02(2014) 023, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2014)023,arXiv:1307.8122

    2014 doi arXiv

  120. [128]

    Soft gluon resummation for gluon-induced Higgs strahlung

    R. V . Harlander, A. Kulesza, V . Theeuwes, and T. Zirke, “Soft gluon resummation for gluon-induced Higgs strahlung”,JHEP11(2014) 082, doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2014)082,arXiv:1410.0217

    2014 doi arXiv

  121. [129]

    HDECAY: A program for Higgs boson decays in the standard model and its supersymmetric extension

    A. Djouadi, J. Kalinowski, and M. Spira, “HDECAY: A program for Higgs boson decays in the standard model and its supersymmetric extension”,Comput. Phys. Commun.108 (1998) 56,doi:10.1016/S0010-4655(97)00123-9,arXiv:hep-ph/9704448

    1998 doi arXiv

  122. [130]

    QCD effects in Higgs physics

    M. Spira, “QCD effects in Higgs physics”,Fortsch. Phys.46(1998) 203, doi:10.1002/(SICI)1521-3978(199804)46:3<203:: AID-PROP203>3.0.CO;2-4,arXiv:hep-ph/9705337

    1998 doi arXiv

  123. [131]

    Precise predictions for the Higgs-boson decayH→WW/ZZ→4 leptons

    A. Bredenstein, A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, and M. M. Weber, “Precise predictions for the Higgs-boson decayH→WW/ZZ→4 leptons”,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 013004, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.013004,arXiv:hep-ph/0604011

    2006 doi arXiv

  124. [132]

    Decays of supersymmetric particles: The program SUSY-HIT (SUspect-SdecaY-Hdecay-InTerface)

    A. Djouadi, M. M. Muhlleitner, and M. Spira, “Decays of supersymmetric particles: The program SUSY-HIT (SUspect-SdecaY-Hdecay-InTerface)”,Acta Phys. Polon. B38(2007) 635,doi:10.48550/arXiv.hep-ph/0609292,arXiv:hep-ph/0609292

    2007 doi arXiv

  125. [133]

    Radiative corrections to the semileptonic and hadronic Higgs-boson decaysH→WW/ZZ→4 fermions

    A. Bredenstein, A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, and M. M. Weber, “Radiative corrections to the semileptonic and hadronic Higgs-boson decaysH→WW/ZZ→4 fermions”,JHEP 02(2007) 080,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/02/080,arXiv:hep-ph/0611234. References 33

    2007 doi arXiv

  126. [134]

    Standard model Higgs-boson branching ratios with uncertainties

    A. Denner et al., “Standard model Higgs-boson branching ratios with uncertainties”, Eur. Phys. J. C71(2011) 1753,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1753-8, arXiv:1107.5909

    2011 doi arXiv

  127. [135]

    A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3

    C. Bierlich et al., “A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3”, SciPost Phys. Codeb.2022(2022) 8,doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCodeb.8, arXiv:2203.11601

    2022 doi arXiv

  128. [136]

    Documentation of TauSpinner algorithms: program for simulating spin effects inτ-lepton production at LHC

    T. Przedzinski, E. Richter-Was, and Z. Was, “Documentation of TauSpinner algorithms: program for simulating spin effects inτ-lepton production at LHC”,Eur. Phys. J. C79 (2019) 91,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6527-0,arXiv:1802.05459

    2019 doi arXiv

  129. [137]

    The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations

    J. Alwall et al., “The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations”,JHEP07 (2014) 079,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079,arXiv:1405.0301

    2014 doi arXiv

  130. [138]

    Merging meets matching in MC@NLO

    R. Frederix and S. Frixione, “Merging meets matching in MC@NLO”,JHEP12(2012) 061,doi:10.1007/jhep12(2012)061,arXiv:1209.6215

    2012 doi arXiv

  131. [139]

    Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions

    J. Alwall et al., “Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions”,Eur. Phys. J. C53(2008) 473, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-007-0490-5,arXiv:0706.2569

    2008 doi arXiv

  132. [140]

    Fully differential NNLO computations with MATRIX

    M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, and M. Wiesemann, “Fully differential NNLO computations with MATRIX”,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 537, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5771-7,arXiv:1711.06631

    2018 doi arXiv

  133. [141]

    NNLO QCD + NLO EW with Matrix+OpenLoops: precise predictions for vector-boson pair production

    M. Grazzini et al., “NNLO QCD + NLO EW with Matrix+OpenLoops: precise predictions for vector-boson pair production”,JHEP02(2020) 087, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2020)087,arXiv:1912.00068

    2020 doi

  134. [142]

    Hadronic top-quark pair-production with one jet and parton showering

    S. Alioli, S.-O. Moch, and P . Uwer, “Hadronic top-quark pair-production with one jet and parton showering”,JHEP01(2012) 137,doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2012)137, arXiv:1110.5251

    2012 doi arXiv

  135. [143]

    Single-topWt-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method

    E. Re, “Single-topWt-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method”,Eur. Phys. J. C71(2011) 1547, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1547-z,arXiv:1009.2450

    2011 doi arXiv

  136. [144]

    Single-topt-channel hadroproduction in the four-flavour scheme with POWHEG and aMC@NLO

    R. Frederix, E. Re, and P . Torrielli, “Single-topt-channel hadroproduction in the four-flavour scheme with POWHEG and aMC@NLO”,JHEP09(2012) 130, doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2012)130,arXiv:1207.5391

    2012 doi arXiv

  137. [145]

    Top++: a program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders

    M. Czakon and A. Mitov, “Top++: a program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders”,Comput. Phys. Commun.185(2014) 2930, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2014.06.021,arXiv:1112.5675

    2014 doi arXiv

  138. [146]

    Single-top-quark production in the t-channel at NNLO

    J. Campbell, T. Neumann, and Z. Sullivan, “Single-top-quark production in the t-channel at NNLO”,JHEP02(2021) 040,doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2021)040, arXiv:2012.01574

    2021 doi

  139. [147]

    Higher-order corrections fortWproduction at high-energy hadron colliders

    N. Kidonakis and N. Yamanaka, “Higher-order corrections fortWproduction at high-energy hadron colliders”,JHEP05(2021) 278, doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2021)278,arXiv:2102.11300. 34

    2021 doi

  140. [148]

    Parton distributions from high-precision collider data

    NNPDF Collaboration, “Parton distributions from high-precision collider data”,Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 663,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5199-5, arXiv:1706.00428

    2017 doi arXiv

  141. [149]

    Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements

    CMS Collaboration, “Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements”,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 4, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7499-4,arXiv:1903.12179

    2020 doi

  142. [150]

    GEANT4—a simulation toolkit

    GEANT4 Collaboration, “GEANT4—a simulation toolkit”,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506 (2003) 250,doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8

    2003 doi

  143. [151]

    Measurement of the Z/γ ∗ →ττcross section in pp collisions at√s=13 TeV and validation ofτlepton analysis techniques

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the Z/γ ∗ →ττcross section in pp collisions at√s=13 TeV and validation ofτlepton analysis techniques”,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 708,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6146-9,arXiv:1801.03535

    2018 doi arXiv

  144. [152]

    MET performance in 8 TeV data

    CMS Collaboration, “MET performance in 8 TeV data”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-JME-12-002, 2013

    2013

  145. [153]

    Measurement of the differential cross section for top quark pair production in pp collisions at √s=8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the differential cross section for top quark pair production in pp collisions at √s=8 TeV”,Eur. Phys. J. C75(2015) 2339, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3709-x,arXiv:1505.04480

    2015 doi arXiv

  146. [154]

    XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system

    T. Chen and C. Guestrin, “XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system”, inProc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, p. 785. 2016. arXiv:1603.02754.doi:10.1145/2939672.2939785

    2016 doi arXiv

  147. [155]

    Optuna: A next-generation hyperparameter optimization framework

    T. Akiba et al., “Optuna: A next-generation hyperparameter optimization framework”, 2019.https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.10902

    2019 arXiv

  148. [156]

    Incorporating nuisance parameters in likelihoods for multisource spectra

    J. S. Conway, “Incorporating nuisance parameters in likelihoods for multisource spectra”, inPHYSTAT 2011, p. 115. 2011.arXiv:1103.0354. doi:10.5170/CERN-2011-006.115

    2011 doi arXiv

  149. [157]

    Fitting using finite Monte Carlo samples

    R. Barlow and C. Beeston, “Fitting using finite Monte Carlo samples”,Comput. Phys. Commun.77(1993) 219,doi:10.1016/0010-4655(93)90005-W

    1993 doi

  150. [158]

    The CMS statistical analysis and combination tool: Combine

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS statistical analysis and combination tool: Combine”, Comput. Softw. Big Sci.8(2024) 19,doi:10.1007/s41781-024-00121-4, arXiv:2404.06614

    2024 doi

  151. [159]

    Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in Summer 2011

    ATLAS and CMS Collaborations, and LHC Higgs Combination Group, “Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in Summer 2011”, Technical Report CMS-NOTE-2011-005, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2011-11, 2011

    2011

  152. [160]

    Snowmass White Paper: Prospects of CP-violation measurements with the Higgs boson at future experiments

    A. V . Gritsan et al., “Snowmass White Paper: Prospects of CP-violation measurements with the Higgs boson at future experiments”, 2022.arXiv:2205.07715. 35 A The CMS Collaboration Yerevan Physics Institute, Yerevan, Armenia A. Gevorgyan , A. Hayrapetyan, V . Makarenko , A. Tum...

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed June 28, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.