Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 44 references

X-ray Emission Properties of a Compact Symmetric Object Sample

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For 17 bona-fide compact symmetric objects, X-ray emission is dominated by jet or lobe radiation rather than the accretion disk-corona.

desk verdict Careful homogeneous X-ray analysis of 17 bona-fide CSOs, but the 'not highly obscured' and FR I resemblance claims hinge on excluding four known heavily obscured CSOs. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.01115 v1 pith:FNPBDUHL submitted 2025-02-03 astro-ph.HE

Ying-Ying Gan , Su Yao , Tan-Zheng Wu , Hai-Ming Zhang , Jin Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords compactsymmetricobjectsactivegalacticnucleiradiojetsX-rayspectroscopygalaxiesintrinsicabsorptioninverseComptonemission
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Using Chandra and XMM-Newton spectra of 17 bona-fide compact symmetric objects (CSOs) — young, kiloparsec-scale radio galaxies — this paper asks what produces their X-rays. It finds that most of the 32 usable spectra are simple absorbed power laws, that no source in the sample requires an intrinsic absorbing column above $10^{23}\,\mathrm{cm}^{-2}$, and that the photon index and radio–X-ray luminosity distributions resemble FR I radio galaxies and radio-loud quasars more than FR II galaxies or radio-quiet quasars. It also finds no correlation between $\Gamma_{\rm X}$ and Eddington ratio, a correlation that radio-quiet AGNs show. The paper concludes that non-thermal jet or mini-lobe radiation, most likely inverse-Compton emission, dominates the X-ray output of most CSOs, with the disk-corona playing at most a secondary role.

What carries the argument

The analysis is carried by the absorbed power-law spectral fit, $N(E)=AE^{-\Gamma_{\rm X}}\exp[-N_{\rm H}^{\rm gal}\sigma(E)-N_{\rm H}^{\rm int}\sigma(E(1+z))]$, applied to 32 spectra from 17 CSOs. Each fit yields the intrinsic absorbing column density $N_{\rm H}^{\rm int}$ and the photon spectral index $\Gamma_{\rm X}$, and these two parameters are then compared across samples: $N_{\rm H}^{\rm int}$ against FR I and FR II radio galaxies, $\Gamma_{\rm X}$ against radio-loud quasars, radio-quiet quasars, and low-excitation radio galaxies, and the pair of X-ray and radio luminosities on the FR I/FR II plane. The distinguishing test is the absence of the $\Gamma_{\rm X}$–Eddington-ratio correlation that radio-quiet AGNs exhibit, which the paper takes as a sign that the X-ray spectrum is not set by the accretion disk-corona.

What would settle it

A deep X-ray campaign on the five sample CSOs that currently lack usable spectra (0108+388, B2 0116+31, JVAS J1035+5628, JVAS J1247+6723, and 1358+625) would settle whether the low intrinsic columns are real: if several of them show $N_{\rm H}^{\rm int}>10^{23}\,\mathrm{cm}^{-2}$, the paper's 'not highly obscured' conclusion is a selection artifact.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that X-ray emission across the bona-fide CSO population is predominantly non-thermal and jet/lobe-related rather than disk-corona-related. The evidence is three-fold: the intrinsic column densities of the 17 analyzed CSOs cluster around $10^{21}$–$10^{22}\,\mathrm{cm}^{-2}$ and are statistically indistinguishable from FR I radio galaxies while distinct from FR II galaxies; the photon spectral indices ($\Gamma_{\rm X}\approx0.75$–$3.0$, clustered near $1.5$–$2.0$) match radio-loud quasars and low-excitation radio galaxies and differ from radio-quiet quasars; and on the radio–X-ray luminosity plane the CSOs sit in the FR I locus, at higher luminosities. The absence of the $\Gamma_{\rm X}$–$R_{\rm Edd}$ correlation observed in radio-quiet AGNs is used as additional evidence against a corona-dominated origin. The paper explicitly allows that a disk-corona contribution cannot be fully excluded in individual objects.

Load-bearing premise

The 17 CSOs with usable spectra are assumed to represent the whole bona-fide CSO class; if the five sources without spectra, the excluded NGC 4278, or the four previously studied obscured CSOs are systematically more absorbed, the conclusion that CSOs are not highly obscured would not generalize.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The bona-fide CSO population, as sampled here, is not highly obscured: intrinsic columns stay below $10^{23}\,\mathrm{cm}^{-2}$, matching FR I rather than FR II radio galaxies.
  • Most CSO X-ray spectra are adequately described by a single absorbed power law; the minority that are not show soft thermal plasma ($kT\sim0.8$ keV) or Fe K$\alpha$ at about 6.4 keV.
  • The $\Gamma_{\rm X}$–$R_{\rm Edd}$ relation used to estimate Eddington ratios in radio-quiet AGNs does not hold for CSOs, so X-ray spectral slope should not be used that way for these objects.
  • The few CSOs observed at multiple epochs show no strong X-ray flux variability, consistent with an extended, non-variable jet/lobe origin.
  • If the conclusion holds, CSOs are X-ray analogues of FR I radio galaxies: their X-rays trace the jet and mini-lobes rather than the accretion flow.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the jet/lobe interpretation is right, CSO X-ray luminosity should track radio lobe luminosity and not black-hole mass; a larger sample with matched core and lobe radio fluxes could test this.
  • Beyond the paper: the five CSOs that yielded no usable spectrum and the four previously studied obscured CSOs sit at the high-column end of the distribution; a deep X-ray campaign on those five would show whether the 'not highly obscured' result is a selection artifact.
  • Beyond the paper: combining the same spectral modeling with NuSTAR hard-X-ray data would separate torus-scattered from jet emission through the shape and strength of the Fe K$\alpha$ line, a test the current 0.5–7.5 keV band cannot fully perform.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a uniform X-ray spectral analysis of Chandra and XMM-Newton observations for 17 bona-fide compact symmetric objects (CSOs) drawn from the Kiehlmann et al. (2024) catalog, yielding 32 usable spectra. Most spectra are fit with an absorbed power-law model; six spectra require an additional soft thermal component and two show an Fe K-alpha line. The authors derive intrinsic column densities, photon indices, and 2-10 keV luminosities, and compare the resulting distributions with FR I/FR II radio galaxies, radio-loud quasars, low-excitation radio galaxies, and radio-quiet quasars. They find no significant correlation between photon index and Eddington ratio, and conclude that jet/lobe emission likely dominates the X-ray output of these CSOs, with an important selection caveat involving four previously studied heavily obscured CSOs that are excluded from the main analysis.

Significance. If the conclusions hold, this would be one of the most systematic X-ray censuses of CSOs to date, directly informing the debate on whether CSO X-rays come from accretion disks or jets/lobes. The paper's strengths are its careful data reduction, explicit treatment of pileup and background flares, detailed per-source appendix, and use of literature comparisons with appropriate statistical tests. The main weakness is that the headline claim of low obscuration and FR I-like X-ray properties is derived from a selected subsample that deliberately excludes four bona-fide CSOs known to have intrinsic columns above 10^23 cm^-2; this selection directly affects the central interpretation, so the conclusions need to be either re-derived with those sources included or explicitly restricted to the unobscured subsample.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5.1 and Abstract] The claim that 'none of the CSOs in our sample have N_H^int > 10^23 cm^-2' is true by construction, because the sample excludes four bona-fide CSOs (OQ 208, JVAS J1511+0518, S4 2021+61, NGC 7674) that are already known to have N_H in the range 10^23-10^24 cm^-2 (Appendix A, Table A.1). The K-S test in Section 5.1 compares only the 17 analyzed CSOs (and further excludes upper limits) against FR I and FR II samples, yielding pKS=0.15 vs FR I and pKS=1.75e-3 vs FR II. Including the four obscured CSOs would extend the CSO N_H distribution above 10^23 cm^-2 and would likely erase or weaken the statistical distinction from FR II RGs and the claimed similarity to FR I RGs. Since the FR I resemblance is used as a supporting argument for the jet/lobe-dominance conclusion in Section 5.2.2, this selection effect is load-bearing. Please re-run the distribution comparison including the four obscured CSOs, or alternatively restrict all population-level statements in the Abstract and Summary to the unobscured subsample with an explicit caveat.
  2. [Section 2 and Appendix B] The sample completeness is a related but distinct concern. Of the 27 CSOs with X-ray observations, only 17 yield usable spectra; five CSOs are lost to low counts or high background, and NGC 4278 is excluded because of variability and TeV association. If these excluded objects are systematically more obscured or fainter than the detected sources, the derived distributions of N_H, L_2-10 keV, and the radio-X-ray correlation would all be biased. The paper documents these exclusions transparently, but it does not quantify the potential bias. At minimum, the conclusions should be stated as applying to the 17 detected CSOs, not to the full CSO population; ideally the authors should compare redshift, radio luminosity, and linear size between the included and excluded sources to show that the detected subset is representative.
  3. [Section 5.2.3 and Table 1] The absence of a Gamma_X-REdd correlation is presented as supporting evidence for jet dominance, but the Eddington ratios are taken from four different literature methods (emission-line luminosities, host-galaxy scaling relations, bulge luminosity, and IR-based disk luminosity), and the authors explicitly state that the systematic uncertainty from method choice is unquantified. The bootstrap correlation accounts only for the X-ray parameter errors, not for the R_Edd systematics. The conclusion 'no significant correlation' is therefore weaker than stated, because the R_Edd values carry unknown but potentially large inter-method offsets. This should be acknowledged explicitly in the discussion and summary.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.1, first paragraph] The XMM-Newton SAS version is listed as 'version -1.3', which appears to be a typo; please correct it to the actual SAS version used.
  2. [Section 4, bullet 'Soft X-ray exceeds'] The phrase 'Soft X-ray exceeds' should read 'Soft X-ray excess'.
  3. [Section 5.1, K-S test interpretation] The paper states that pKS > 0.1 'strongly suggests no statistical difference' and pKS < 1e-4 'strongly indicates' a difference. Statistically, p > 0.1 is only weak evidence against a difference, not strong evidence of equality. Also, pKS = 1.75e-3 against FR II is moderate evidence, so the wording 'more like FR I than FR II' is somewhat stronger than the test supports. Please soften these interpretations.
  4. [Figure 5 and Section 5.2.2] Panel (b) uses 8 GHz core luminosities for CSOs while the FR I/FR II comparison sample appears to be at 5 GHz. Please clarify whether the 8 GHz data are k-corrected and whether the comparison lines in panel (b) also refer to 8 GHz, or note explicitly that the comparison is approximate because of the frequency mismatch.
  5. [Abstract and Section 4] The quoted ranges for N_H, Gamma_X, and L_2-10 keV mix best-fit values and upper limits (for example, several N_H values are upper limits). Please state explicitly in the abstract or in the results section that the ranges include upper limits, so readers do not interpret them as fully measured detections.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circularity found; the analysis is an observational study with external comparison samples, and the minor self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper does not claim to derive X-ray properties from first principles; it fits X-ray spectra with standard absorbed power-law models and compares the resulting distributions with independently published samples. No fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and the few self-citations (e.g., Gan et al. 2024 for gamma-ray detections) are supporting context rather than load-bearing premises. The exclusion of four heavily obscured CSOs is a transparent sample-selection choice that may affect representativeness, but it does not make the inference circular in the sense of reducing an output to an input by construction. Accordingly, no circularity step warrants flagging.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The conclusions depend on the assumed spectral model (absorbed power law with optional APEC and Gaussian line), on the literature Eddington ratios used in the correlation test, and on the representativeness of external comparison samples. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • Per-source absorbed power-law normalization A = 10^-5 to 10^-3 photons keV^-1 cm^-2 s^-1 at 1 keV
    Normalization fitted in XSPEC; determines flux and luminosity.
  • Per-source photon index Gamma_X = 0.75 to 3.0
    Fitted spectral slope; used in distribution comparisons and correlation tests.
  • Per-source intrinsic column density NH_int = 1e20 to 1e23 cm^-2, many upper limits
    Fitted absorption; central to the not-highly-obscured claim.
  • Thermal plasma temperature kT (APEC) = 0.8 keV for PKS 1718-649 and NGC 3894; 0.83 keV for PKS B1345+125
    Fitted for soft-excess spectra to model extended hot gas; abundances fixed to solar.
  • Iron line energy and normalization (zgauss) = 6.4 to 6.6 keV
    Fitted in two spectra; line width fixed at 0.01 keV; identified as Fe K-alpha.
  • Eddington ratios R_Edd (input from literature) = log R_Edd from -4 to -0.5
    Taken from four different papers with different estimators; used without propagated uncertainties in the Gamma_X-REdd test.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The X-ray spectra of CSOs are well described by an absorbed power-law model (tbabs*ztbabs(powerlaw)), with optional APEC thermal plasma and Gaussian line components for a few sources.
    Section 3.2 and Eq. 1; the entire spectral fitting and all derived quantities assume this emission model.
  • domain assumption Galactic absorption NH_gal is fixed at the HI4PI values and does not contribute uncertainty to the fits.
    Section 3.2; NH_gal fixed, so its uncertainty is not propagated into NH_int or Gamma_X.
  • ad hoc to paper For sources with multiple observations, NH_int is constant across epochs and is fixed from a joint fit, with only Gamma_X and normalization allowed to vary.
    Section 3.2; this assumption could bias variability results if absorption changes, though the paper notes no significant variability.
  • domain assumption The Eddington ratios compiled from Liao & Gu (2020), Wojtowicz et al. (2020), Balasubramaniam et al. (2021), and Woo & Urry (2002) are reliable and comparable despite different estimation methods.
    Section 5.2.3; the authors state they cannot quantify the resulting uncertainties, yet use these values to test the Gamma_X-REdd correlation.
  • domain assumption The external comparison samples (RLQs, RQQs, LERGs, FR I and FR II RGs) are representative and free of selection effects that could mimic the observed similarities.
    Sections 5.1 and 5.2; K-S tests and the radio-X-ray plane comparison assume these literature samples are fair comparators.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of X-ray Emission Properties of a Compact Symmetric Object Sample." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FNPBDUHL

@misc{pith2026250201115,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: X-ray Emission Properties of a Compact Symmetric Object Sample},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FNPBDUHL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.01115}
}
abstract

We present a comprehensive analysis of the X-ray observations obtained from \xmm\, and \chandra\, for a sample of bona-fide Compact Symmetric Objects (CSOs) to investigate their X-ray emission properties. Ultimately, we obtain 32 effective X-ray observational spectra from 17 CSOs. Most spectra can be well described by an absorbed single power-law model, with the exception of 6 spectra requiring an additional component in the soft X-ray band and 2 spectra exhibiting an iron emission line component. The data analysis results unveil the diverse characteristics of X-ray emission from CSOs. The sample covers X-ray luminosity ranging within $10^{40}-10^{45}$ erg s$^{-1}$, intrinsic absorbing column density ($N_{\rm H}^{\rm int}$) ranging within $10^{20}-10^{23}$ cm$^{-2}$, and photon spectral index ($\Gamma_{\rm X}$) ranging within 0.75--3.0. None of the CSOs in our sample have $N_{\rm H}^{\rm int}$ > $10^{23}\rm~cm^{-2}$, indicating that the X-ray emission in these CSOs is not highly obscured. The distribution of $\Gamma_{\rm X}$ for these CSOs closely resembles that observed in a sample of radio-loud quasars and low-excitation radio galaxies (RGs). In the radio--X-ray luminosity panel, these CSOs exhibit a distribution more akin to FR I RGs than FR II RGs, characterized by higher luminosities. The positive correlation between $\Gamma_{\rm X}$ and the Eddington ratio, which has been noted in radio-quiet active galactic nuclei, is not observed in these CSOs. These findings suggest that although the contribution of the disk-corona system cannot be completely ruled out, jet/lobe radiation likely plays a dominant role in the X-ray emission of these CSOs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.01115 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The distributions of N int H (Panel-(a)), ΓX (Panel-(b)), and L2−10 keV (Panel-(c)) for the CSO sample, where the diagonal shaded areas indicate the distributions of 4 obscured CSOs. The data of the 4 obscured CSOs are taken from Gandhi et al. (2017) and Sobolewska et al. (2019a, 2023). The empty area in the Panel-(a) indicates that only an upper-limit value of N int H is obtained. 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 0.0 … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. ΓX as a function of L2−10 keV for the CSO sample. The solid squares represent the 17 CSOs analyzed in this work while the opened squares represent the 4 obscured CSOs. The data of the 4 obscured CSOs are taken from Gandhi et al. (2017) and Sobolewska et al. (2019a, 2023) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison of the N int H distributions. The N int H values of FR I RGs are taken from Donato et al. (2004) and Evans et al. (2006). The N int H values of FR II RGs are taken from Hardcastle et al. (2009) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The distributions of ΓX for various types of AGN samples, where the LERG sample is taken from Evans et al. (2006), Belsole et al. (2006), and Hardcastle et al. (2006, 2009). The RLQ sample is taken from Reeves & Turner (2000), and the two RQQ samples are taken from Ree…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Panel-(a): L5 GHz vs. L2−10keV, where L5 GHz is the core radio luminosity at 5 GHz and L2−10keV is the X-ray luminosity in the 2–10 keV band. The black and red solid lines are the best linear-fitting lines for FR I and FR II RGs, respectively, with the corresponding 95…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: ΓX as a function of REdd. The green solid squares represent the CSOs analyzed in this work, while the green opened squares represent the 4 obscured CSOs. The wine red solid squares indicate the very RL sources with R > 100 taken from Brightman et al. (2013). The black …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2012, ApJS, 198, 5, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/198/1/5 Balasubramaniam, K., Stawarz, Ł., Cheung, C

    An, T., Wu, F., Yang, J., et al. 2012, ApJS, 198, 5, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/198/1/5 Balasubramaniam, K., Stawarz, Ł., Cheung, C. C., et al. 2021, ApJ, 922, 84, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1ff5 Balmaverde, B., Capetti, A., & Grandi, P. 2006, A&A, 451, 35, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053799 Belsole, E., Worrall, D. M., & Hardcastle, M. J. 2006, MNRAS, 366, 339, do...

    work page arXiv 2012

  2. [2]

    A., Worrall, D

    http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0090-5364(197901)7:1<1:BMALAT>2.0.CO;2-6&origin=MSN Evans, D. A., Worrall, D. M., Hardcastle, M. J., Kraft, R. P., & Birkinshaw, M. 2006, ApJ, 642, 96, doi: 10.1086/500658 Fabian, A. C., Iwasawa, K., Reynolds, C. S., & Young, A. J. 2000, PASP, 112, 1145, doi: 10.1086/316610 Fanali, R., Caccianiga, A., Severgnini, P., et al...

    work page arXiv 2006

  3. [3]

    S4 2021+61

    8 × 1042 erg s −1. S4 2021+61 . By combining the observational data from XMM-Newton and NuSTAR, Sobolewska et al. (2023) also constructed its broadband X-ray spectrum, which is als o fitted with a toroidal reprocessor model. The derived equivalent column density is ∼ 1024 cm−2 with a photon spectral index of Γ X =

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    TXS 0128+554

    However, the recorded net photon counts are insufficient to generate a valid X-ray spectrum. TXS 0128+554. It is a γ-ray emitting CSO ( Lister et al. 2020 ; Gan et al. 2024 ). Chandra conducted a series of daily observations from 2019 March 29 to 2019 April 01, totaling fo ur observations. We extract the X-ray spectrum from each observation and perform a jo...

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    NGC 7674

    1 × 1044 erg s −1. NGC 7674 . By combining the observational data from NuSTAR, Swift-XRT, and Suzaku, Gandhi et al. (2017) assumed geometry of the nuclear obscurer/reflector to carry out the X-ray spectrum modeling in the 0.5-78 keV band. They obtained the column density of

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    4 × 1024 cm−2 with a photon spectral index of Γ X = 2 . 07+0. 15 −0. 11 and the 2-10 keV luminosity of L2−10 keV ∼ 3 − 5 × 1043 erg s −1. The information regarding the four obscured CSOs is also inc luded in Table A.1. B. ANALYSIS OF X-RAY DATA FOR INDIVIDUAL CSOS In this study, we acquired 18 valid X-ray spectral fits from 12 Chandra observations and 14 v...

    work page 2004

  7. [9]

    B2 0116+31

    The extracted X-ray spectrum is unsuitable for spectral fitting due to low signal-to-noise ratio. B2 0116+31 . It is only observed once by Chandra on 2010 November

    work page 2010

  8. [10]

    Subsequently, we fix this N int H value for the spectral fitting of other observations and derive the values of Γ X and F2−10 keV for each observation

    × 1021 cm−2. Subsequently, we fix this N int H value for the spectral fitting of other observations and derive the values of Γ X and F2−10 keV for each observation. Our analysis reveals that TXS 0128+55 4 does not exhibit any discernible X-ray variability or spectral e volution on daily timescales. Lister et al. (2020) combined the four observations and der...

    work page 2020

Show all 44 references
  1. [11]

    The values of F2−10 keV for both observations are very similar

    However, considering the associated errors, Γ X remains relatively consistent between these two observati ons. The values of F2−10 keV for both observations are very similar. B3 0710+439 . Both XMM-Newton and Chandra observed the object on 2004 March 22 and 2011 January 18, re...

    2004

  2. [12]

    Due to insufficient statist ical data, no discernible emission line signal was detected 20 in the observation on 2011 April

    × 1021 cm−2, which was subsequently held constant during the fitting of each X-ray spectrum. Due to insufficient statist ical data, no discernible emission line signal was detected 20 in the observation on 2011 April

    2011

  3. [13]

    Based on the results of spectral fitting, it is observe d that the X-ray spectrum became steeper from 2011 April 04 to 2013 November 06, with Γ X changing from

    The X-ray spectrum from t his observation is well-fitted by an absorbed power-law model. Based on the results of spectral fitting, it is observe d that the X-ray spectrum became steeper from 2011 April 04 to 2013 November 06, with Γ X changing from

    2011

  4. [14]

    Ther efore, we can only utilize the X-ray spectra from two observations

    However, one of the XMM- Newton observations did not yield any significant detections. Ther efore, we can only utilize the X-ray spectra from two observations. Within a radius of 20′′ around the location of NGC 3894 in the Chandra observation image, three X-ray sources were ide...

    2021

  5. [15]

    07 for the 2004 observation and

    2004

  6. [16]

    The corrected flux in the 2-10 keV energy range is (3

    07 for the 2011 observation, consistent within the uncertaint ies. The corrected flux in the 2-10 keV energy range is (3. 67+0. 31 −0

    2011

  7. [18]

    (2006) and Siemiginowska et al

    These findings are consistent with previo us reports by Vink et al. (2006) and Siemiginowska et al. (2016). JVAS J1035+5628. The observation was conducted using XMM-Newton on 2004 October

    2006

  8. [21]

    After excluding the affected periods, we manage to extract the X-ray spectrum of t he source; however, its signal-to-noise ratio is insufficien t for reliable spectral fitting

    However, persistent high background burst activity significantly impacts the ob servation for most of the duration. After excluding the affected periods, we manage to extract the X-ray spectrum of t he source; however, its signal-to-noise ratio is insufficien t for reliable spectr...

    2006

  9. [22]

    × 10−14 erg cm −2 s−1, consistent with previous findings reported in Tengstrand et al. (2009). NGC 3894 . It is also a γ-ray emitting CSO ( Principe et al. 2020 ; Gan et al. 2024 ). The object has been observed once by Chandra on 2009 July 20 and twice by XMM-Newton on 2022 November

    2009

  10. [23]

    B3 0402+379

    × 10−13 erg cm −2 s−1 in the 2–10 keV band. B3 0402+379. The Chandra observations were conducted on 2011 April 04 and 2013 Novemb er

    2011

  11. [24]

    JVAS J1234+4753

    × 10−13 erg cm −2 s−1. JVAS J1234+4753. The X-ray observations were conducted by Chandra on 2002 March 23 and XMM-Newton on 2004 June

    2002

  12. [25]

    9 × 1021 cm−2 and Γ X = 2 . 21+0. 44 −0. 23 for the MOS spectrum. Green et al. (2009) reported N int H = (0 . 6+1. 2 −0

    2009

  13. [26]

    × 1021 cm−2 and Γ X = 1 . 80+0. 24 −0. 20 for the Chandra observation. The discrepancies in their fitting results can be attributed to the omission of the pileup effect in their analysis. JVAS J1247+6723. The observation was conducted by XMM-Newton on 2005 November

    2005

  14. [27]

    Using the same model, Tengstrand et al

    × 10−14 erg cm −2 s−1. Using the same model, Tengstrand et al. (2009) fitted the spectrum in the 2–10 keV band and obtained N int H = (1 . 2+0. 6 −0

    2009

  15. [28]

    The values for spectral index and flux are generally consist ent with theirs; however, we only obtain an upper limit for N int H possibly due to our narrower fitted energy band

    × 10−14 erg cm −2 s−1. The values for spectral index and flux are generally consist ent with theirs; however, we only obtain an upper limit for N int H possibly due to our narrower fitted energy band. PKS B1345+125 . It was observed by Chandra on 2000 February

    2000

  16. [29]

    21 DA 344

    However, due to the low signal-to-noise ratio, an X-ray spectral analysis coul d not be performed. 21 DA 344 . The XMM-Newton observation was conducted on 2007 December

    2007

  17. [30]

    83+0. 10 −0. 10 keV. The soft X-ray thermal emission is attributed to the ext ended emission in PKS B1345+125, which may be related to the galaxy halo ( Siemiginowska et al. 2008 ). Furthermore, the measured kT value is consistent with those reported for PKS 1718–649 and NGC 3...

    2006

  18. [31]

    4C 52.37

    × 10−14 erg cm −2 s−1. 4C 52.37 . It was observed by Chandra on 2007 June

    2007

  19. [32]

    (2011), the resulting fitting statistics is 14.8/5 for the C-statistic method

    Although applying a forced fit with an absorbed power-law model yields similar results to those reported in de Gasperin et al. (2011), the resulting fitting statistics is 14.8/5 for the C-statistic method. CTD 93 . It has been observed once by Chandra on 2010 December 4 and twic...

    2011

  20. [33]

    × 10−13 erg cm −2 s−1 on 2004 March 22, and increasing to (4. 76+0. 39 −0

    2004

  21. [34]

    These findings are consistent with those reported in Siemiginowska et al

    2 × 1021 cm−2. These findings are consistent with those reported in Siemiginowska et al. (2016). Applying the same model to fit the MOS spectrum (Obs-ID 0502 510401), we obtain Γ X = 2 . 24+3. 87 −0. 75 and F2−10 keV = (3. 1+0. 8 −1

    2016

  22. [35]

    These findings are consistent with those reported by Guainazzi et al

    × 10−13 erg cm −2 s−1. These findings are consistent with those reported by Guainazzi et al. (2006), considering the associated uncertainties. 0108+388. XMM-Newton observed it on 2004 January

    2006

  23. [36]

    PKS 1718–649

    73 × 1022 cm−2. PKS 1718–649 . It is the first identified γ-ray emitting CSO ( Migliori et al. 2016 ; Gan et al. 2024 ). The source was observed six times, three times by Chandra on 2010 November 9, 2014 June 20 and 23, and another three time s by XMM-Newton on 2017 March 5, 201...

    2016

  24. [37]

    These residuals may be attributed to the extende d X-ray emission in PKS 1718–649 (e.g., Siemiginowska et al

    After conside ring an absorbed power-law model, no significant residuals are observed in the soft X-ray band o f Chandra’s spectra, while obvious residuals can be found in the soft X-ray band of XMM-Newton ’s spectra. These residuals may be attributed to the extende d X-ray emi...

    2016

  25. [38]

    To ensure accurate measurements, we extract the source spectrum from the XMM-Newton observation within a range of ∼ 16′′

    In the obtained images, a secondary source adjacent to PKS 1934–63 is identi fied. To ensure accurate measurements, we extract the source spectrum from the XMM-Newton observation within a range of ∼ 16′′. The spectral extraction for the Chandra observation remains unaffected by ...

    1934

  26. [39]

    The photon spectral index and intrinsic 2-10 keV flux remain consistent in both observa tions

    0 × 1021 cm−2. The photon spectral index and intrinsic 2-10 keV flux remain consistent in both observa tions. Siemiginowska et al. (2016) also analyzed the same Chandra observation and obtained N int H = (8 +7 −6) × 1020 cm−2, Γ X =

    2016

  27. [40]

    × 10−13 erg cm −2 s−1 on 2011 January

    2011

  28. [41]

    The values of Γ X and F2−10 keV are in agreement with our results

    × 10−13 erg cm −2 s−1. The values of Γ X and F2−10 keV are in agreement with our results. However, the source and ba ckground extracted regions in their study are significantly smaller t han ours, and the background was not considered in their analysis. These differences in proc...

    1943

  29. [42]

    Siemiginowska et al

    26 × 1022 cm−2. Siemiginowska et al. (2016) analyzed the same observation, and they adopted the same model for fitting the X-ray spectrum, also fixing Γ X at

    2016

  30. [43]

    Considering the associated uncertainties, the F2−10 keV value is consistent with our results

    × 10−14 erg cm −2 s−1. Considering the associated uncertainties, the F2−10 keV value is consistent with our results. However, similar to the Chandra observation of PKS 1934–63, discrepancies in N int H may arise from differences in data processing. S5 1946+70 . The source was o...

    1934

  31. [44]

    Vink et al

    × 10−14 erg cm −2 s−1. Vink et al. (2006) adopted a higher cutoff count rate to exclude time intervals with elevated background activity, thereby obta ining the source spectrum; however, their selected cutoff ra te exceeded that utilized in our analysis. 23 0.01 2×10−3 5×10−3 0....

    2006

  32. [45]

    No significant variability in X-ray flux is observed between the two observations; however, there is a notable change in the s pectral shape from soft to hard

    × 10−13 erg cm −2 s−1. No significant variability in X-ray flux is observed between the two observations; however, there is a notable change in the s pectral shape from soft to hard. The same absorbed power-law model is also employed to fit the X-ray spectra repo rted in previous...

    2016

  33. [46]

    S4 2021+61 3.7 +0.8 −0.5 1.45+0.09 −0.05 11 XMM-Newton/NuSTAR

    2021

  34. [47]

    Sobolewska et al. (2023)

    2023

  35. [48]

    Gandhi et al. (2017)

    2017

  36. [208]

    By combining the observational data from XMM-Newton and NuSTAR, Sobolewska et al

    JVAS J1511+0518. By combining the observational data from XMM-Newton and NuSTAR, Sobolewska et al. (2023) constructed a broadband X-ray spectrum. They found that a to roidal reprocessor model can reproduce the spectrum well, the equivalent column density is ∼ 1024 cm−2 with a ...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.