Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 1 minor 161 references

Boom, Bubble, or Buildout? A Multi-Method Evaluation of Whether Artificial Intelligence Is in an Ongoing Financial Bubble

T0 review · 1 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-06-28 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read AI is a real technological revolution accompanied by localized bubble dynamics in valuations.

desk verdict The paper assembles existing bubble tests into a five-pillar checklist and applies them qualitatively to AI, but supplies no test statistics or robustness checks to support the 'localized' qualifier. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.01575 v1 pith:FR32KSPK submitted 2026-06-01 q-fin.MF

Qianan Wang , Zen Chen This is my paper · ORCID
classification q-fin.MF
keywords artificialintelligencefinancialbubblesassetvaluationbubbledetectiontechnologicaladoptioncapitalexpendituremarketsentiment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper evaluates whether rapid AI investment growth signals an ongoing financial bubble or durable technology adoption. It links core asset pricing concepts to bubble detection tools and applies them to recent data on revenues, spending, and market behavior. Evidence supports both substantial fundamentals from actual adoption and revenue increases, and fragilities from spending outpacing monetization plus concentrated holdings. The result is a middle view: AI drives genuine change with pockets of speculative pressure, rather than a full mania or a bubble-free advance.

What carries the argument

A five-pillar diagnostic framework that combines fundamental valuation, residual-exuberance tests, SADF/GSADF explosive-root procedures, LPPL/HLPPL price-pattern diagnostics, sentiment and issuance measures, and capex-payback analysis.

What would settle it

Future data on whether AI revenues accelerate enough to close the gap with recent capital expenditure growth would confirm or refute the balance between fundamentals and fragilities.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The analysis begins from asset-pricing foundations in state prices, stochastic discount factors, martingale valuation, and pricing kernels, then connects these foundations to rational bubbles, behavioral bubbles, technology manias, and modern econometric bubble-detection methods. Current evidence shows both genuine fundamentals and bubble-like fragilities. On the fundamental side, realized revenue growth, enterprise adoption, and productivity evidence support a nontrivial share of AI valuations. On the fragile side, capital expenditure has accelerated faster than observed monetization in some layers, private-market valuations are concentrated in a small number of firms, and investor narrativ

Load-bearing premise

The five-pillar diagnostic framework can reliably distinguish localized bubble dynamics from fundamentals using evidence on revenue growth and adoption.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Realized revenue growth and enterprise adoption back a meaningful share of current AI asset values.
  • Capital expenditure has risen faster than observed monetization in some parts of the sector.
  • Private-market valuations remain concentrated in a small number of firms.
  • Investor narratives frequently price in future productivity gains ahead of cash-flow evidence.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Tracking whether adoption rates keep pace with spending could help isolate sustainable elements from temporary pressures.
  • The same multi-method checks could be applied to other fast-growing technology areas.
  • Even if localized pressures ease, the underlying technology development would likely persist.
  • Firms showing clearer links between spending and near-term revenue may face less adjustment risk.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a hybrid review and diagnostic framework for evaluating whether AI-related assets are experiencing an ongoing financial bubble as of May 2026. It begins with asset-pricing foundations (state prices, stochastic discount factors, martingale valuation, pricing kernels) and connects these to rational bubbles, behavioral bubbles, technology manias, and econometric detection methods. It proposes a five-pillar framework (fundamental valuation, residual-exuberance tests, SADF/GSADF explosive-root procedures, LPPL/HLPPL diagnostics, sentiment/issuance measures, and capex-payback analysis) applied to revenue growth, adoption, capex acceleration, valuation concentration, and narrative timing. The central conclusion is that AI constitutes a real technological revolution with localized bubble dynamics rather than a pure speculative mania or bubble-free productivity miracle.

Significance. If the five-pillar application can be shown to reliably isolate localized fragilities, the work would contribute a structured, multi-method lens for assessing technology-driven valuations in financial economics. The explicit grounding in state-price and SDF foundations, combined with standard bubble-detection tools, is a positive feature that avoids purely narrative approaches. The nuanced conclusion (real revolution with localized dynamics) is a strength when supported by concrete evidence.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and five-pillar framework] The central claim that the situation exhibits 'localized bubble dynamics' (rather than pure mania or bubble-free growth) is load-bearing and depends on the five-pillar framework distinguishing these cases. The manuscript description supplies only qualitative citations of the pillars and evidence (revenue growth, capex acceleration, concentrated private valuations) without reporting test statistics, critical values, specific time series or asset baskets, or robustness checks for any pillar. This leaves the interpretive step from raw evidence to the 'localized' qualifier unverifiable.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and framework description would benefit from explicit cross-references to the sections where each pillar's application and results are detailed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed report. The concern about verifiability of the 'localized bubble dynamics' claim is well-taken and points to a presentational gap in how the five-pillar synthesis is documented. We address this directly below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and five-pillar framework] The central claim that the situation exhibits 'localized bubble dynamics' (rather than pure mania or bubble-free growth) is load-bearing and depends on the five-pillar framework distinguishing these cases. The manuscript description supplies only qualitative citations of the pillars and evidence (revenue growth, capex acceleration, concentrated private valuations) without reporting test statistics, critical values, specific time series or asset baskets, or robustness checks for any pillar. This leaves the interpretive step from raw evidence to the 'localized' qualifier unverifiable.

    Authors: We agree that the current draft presents the pillar applications primarily through qualitative synthesis of published evidence rather than new or fully tabulated statistical tests. The manuscript's contribution is the integrated framework itself, grounded in asset-pricing foundations and drawing on existing literature for each pillar (e.g., revenue and adoption data from industry reports, capex-payback ratios from earnings releases, concentration metrics from private-market databases, and narrative timing from sentiment studies). The 'localized' qualifier follows from the documented coexistence of strong fundamentals in some layers with fragilities in others. To make the interpretive mapping explicit, the revised version will add: (i) a summary table listing concrete metrics, sources, and cited test statistics (including GSADF critical values and p-values from referenced studies on AI-related indices where available); (ii) explicit time-series and asset-basket descriptions for the SADF/GSADF and LPPL applications; and (iii) a short robustness subsection noting the sensitivity of conclusions to alternative baskets. These additions will render the step from evidence to conclusion verifiable while preserving the hybrid review-framework character of the paper. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: framework applies standard external methods to synthesize evidence without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The paper begins from established asset-pricing foundations (state prices, SDFs, martingale valuation) and applies known econometric procedures (SADF/GSADF, LPPL/HLPPL) plus standard measures of sentiment, issuance, and capex. No equations, fitted parameters, or predictions are shown that reduce by construction to the paper's own inputs. The five-pillar framework is presented as a synthesis of external diagnostics rather than a self-defined or self-cited derivation. The central interpretive conclusion does not collapse to a renaming or fitted-input prediction; it remains an independent judgment on the balance of cited evidence.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The abstract invokes standard financial-economics concepts without introducing new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities.

assumptions (1)
  • standard math Asset-pricing foundations in state prices, stochastic discount factors, martingale valuation, and pricing kernels
    The analysis begins from these foundations as stated in the abstract.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Boom, Bubble, or Buildout? A Multi-Method Evaluation of Whether Artificial Intelligence Is in an Ongoing Financial Bubble." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FR32KSPK

@misc{pith2026260601575,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Boom, Bubble, or Buildout? A Multi-Method Evaluation of Whether Artificial Intelligence Is in an Ongoing Financial Bubble},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FR32KSPK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.01575}
}
read the original abstract

The rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) investment has revived a recurrent question in financial economics: are AI-related assets experiencing a bubble, or is the market capitaliz- ing a durable general-purpose technology? This paper develops a hybrid review and diagnostic framework for evaluating whether AI is in an ongoing financial bubble as of May 2026. The analysis begins from asset-pricing foundations in state prices, stochastic discount factors, martingale valuation, and pricing kernels, then connects these foundations to rational bubbles, behavioral bubbles, technology manias, and modern econometric bubble-detection methods. Current evidence shows both genuine fundamentals and bubble-like fragilities. On the fundamental side, realized revenue growth, enterprise adoption, and productivity evidence support a nontrivial share of AI valuations. On the fragile side, capital expenditure has accelerated faster than observed monetization in some layers, private- market valuations are concentrated in a small number of firms, and investor narratives often capitalize future productivity gains before they have appeared in cash flows. The paper proposes a five-pillar diagnostic framework that combines fundamental valuation, residual-exuberance tests, SADF/GSADF explosive-root procedures, LPPL/HLPPL price-pattern diagnostics, sen- timent and issuance measures, and capex-payback analysis. The central conclusion is that AI is best understood as a real technological revolution with localized bubble dynamics rather than as either a pure speculative mania or a bubble-free productivity miracle.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.01575 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Conceptual timeline connecting asset-pricing foundations, bubble diagnostics, machine [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Segmented AI stack and bubble-risk channels. The diagram is a conceptual synthesis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Stylized bubble-like price path relative to a fundamental benchmark. The figure is concep [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Multi-pillar diagnostic pipeline for evaluating AI bubble risk. The framework combines [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Capex-to-monetization funnel for AI infrastructure. The figure is a conceptual synthesis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

161 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , title =

    Abreu, Dilip and Brunnermeier, Markus K. , title =. Econometrica , year =

  2. [2]

    2018 , doi =

    Acemoglu, Daron and Restrepo, Pascual , title =. 2018 , doi =

    2018

  3. [3]

    2024 , doi =

    Acemoglu, Daron , title =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  4. [4]

    2018 , address =

    Agrawal, Ajay and Gans, Joshua and Goldfarb, Avi , title =. 2018 , address =

    2018

  5. [5]

    2019 , address =

    The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda , publisher =. 2019 , address =

    2019

  6. [6]

    The Economic Journal , year =

    Allen, Franklin and Gale, Douglas , title =. The Economic Journal , year =

  7. [7]

    , title =

    Arrow, Kenneth J. , title =. Econom\'etrie , publisher =. 1953 , pages =

    1953

  8. [8]

    1900 , address =

    Bachelier, Louis , title =. 1900 , address =

    1900

Show all 161 references
  1. [9]

    Journal of Financial Economics , year =

    Barberis, Nicholas and Shleifer, Andrei and Vishny, Robert , title =. Journal of Financial Economics , year =

  2. [10]

    Journal of Political Economy , year =

    Black, Fischer and Scholes, Myron , title =. Journal of Political Economy , year =

  3. [11]

    and Watson, Mark W

    Blanchard, Olivier J. and Watson, Mark W. , title =. Crises in the Economic and Financial Structure , editor =. 1982 , pages =

    1982

  4. [12]

    and Litzenberger, Robert H

    Breeden, Douglas T. and Litzenberger, Robert H. , title =. Journal of Business , year =

  5. [13]

    , title =

    Brunnermeier, Markus K. , title =. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics , year =

  6. [14]

    American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics , year =

    Brynjolfsson, Erik and Rock, Daniel and Syverson, Chad , title =. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics , year =

  7. [15]

    , title =

    Brynjolfsson, Erik and Li, Danielle and Raymond, Lindsey R. , title =. The Quarterly Journal of Economics , year =

  8. [16]

    2025 , eprint =

    Cao, Zheng and Shao, Xingran and Yan, Yuheng and Geman, Helyette , title =. 2025 , eprint =

    2025

  9. [17]

    State of AI 2025 Report , year =

    2025

  10. [18]

    2026 , note =

    Chen, Kay , title =. 2026 , note =

    2026

  11. [19]

    Management Science , year =

    Chen, Luyang and Pelger, Markus and Zhu, Jason , title =. Management Science , year =

  12. [20]

    2605.27658 , archivePrefix =

    Historical Developments in Probability Measures for Asset Pricing: From State Prices to Modern Pricing Kernels , year =. 2605.27658 , archivePrefix =

    arXiv

  13. [21]

    , title =

    Cochrane, John H. , title =. 2005 , address =

    2005

  14. [22]

    , title =

    David, Paul A. , title =. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings , year =

  15. [23]

    1959 , address =

    Debreu, Gerard , title =. 1959 , address =

    1959

  16. [24]

    Mathematische Annalen , year =

    Delbaen, Freddy and Schachermayer, Walter , title =. Mathematische Annalen , year =

  17. [25]

    and Halperin, Igor and Bilokon, Paul , title =

    Dixon, Matthew F. and Halperin, Igor and Bilokon, Paul , title =. 2020 , address =

    2020

  18. [26]

    2001 , address =

    Duffie, Darrell , title =. 2001 , address =

    2001

  19. [27]

    and Lifshitz-Assaf, Hila and Kellogg, Katherine and Rajendran, Saran and Krayer, Lisa and Candelon, Fran

    Dell'Acqua, Fabrizio and McFowland, Edward and Mollick, Ethan R. and Lifshitz-Assaf, Hila and Kellogg, Katherine and Rajendran, Saran and Krayer, Lisa and Candelon, Fran. Navigating the Jagged Technological Frontier: Field Experimental Evidence of the Effects of AI on Knowledg...

    2023

  20. [28]

    2023 , eprint =

    Eloundou, Tyna and Manning, Sam and Mishkin, Pamela and Rock, Daniel , title =. 2023 , eprint =

    2023

  21. [29]

    , title =

    Fama, Eugene F. , title =. Journal of Finance , year =

  22. [30]

    , title =

    Fama, Eugene F. , title =. American Economic Review , year =

  23. [31]

    and Raj, Manav and Seamans, Robert , title =

    Felten, Edward W. and Raj, Manav and Seamans, Robert , title =. Strategic Management Journal , year =

  24. [32]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , year =

    Filimonov, Vladimir and Sornette, Didier , title =. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , year =

  25. [33]

    1930 , address =

    Fisher, Irving , title =. 1930 , address =

    1930

  26. [34]

    Innovation Policy and the Economy , year =

    Furman, Jason and Seamans, Robert , title =. Innovation Policy and the Economy , year =

  27. [35]

    Tracking Trillions: The Assumptions Shaping the Scale of the AI Build-Out , year =

  28. [36]

    Review of Financial Studies , year =

    Greenwood, Robin and Shleifer, Andrei , title =. Review of Financial Studies , year =

  29. [37]

    Journal of Financial Economics , year =

    Greenwood, Robin and Shleifer, Andrei and You, Yang , title =. Journal of Financial Economics , year =

  30. [38]

    and Stiglitz, Joseph E

    Grossman, Sanford J. and Stiglitz, Joseph E. , title =. American Economic Review , year =

  31. [39]

    Review of Financial Studies , year =

    Gu, Shihao and Kelly, Bryan and Xiu, Dacheng , title =. Review of Financial Studies , year =

  32. [40]

    Journal of Political Economy , year =

    Hansen, Lars Peter and Jagannathan, Ravi , title =. Journal of Political Economy , year =

  33. [41]

    Michael and Kreps, David M

    Harrison, J. Michael and Kreps, David M. , title =. Quarterly Journal of Economics , year =

  34. [42]

    Michael and Kreps, David M

    Harrison, J. Michael and Kreps, David M. , title =. Journal of Economic Theory , year =

  35. [43]

    Michael and Pliska, Stanley R

    Harrison, J. Michael and Pliska, Stanley R. , title =. Stochastic Processes and their Applications , year =

  36. [44]

    Heaton, J. B. and Polson, Nick G. and Witte, Jan Hendrik , title =. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry , year =

  37. [45]

    Journal of Finance , year =

    Hong, Harrison and Scheinkman, Jose and Xiong, Wei , title =. Journal of Finance , year =

  38. [46]

    and Lo, Andrew W

    Hutchinson, James M. and Lo, Andrew W. and Poggio, Tomaso , title =. Journal of Finance , year =

  39. [47]

    Key Questions on Energy and AI , year =

  40. [48]

    and Gorbanyov, Michael and Kido, Yosuke and Koll, David and Ostojic, Dragana and Shang, Baoping and Tamirisa, Natalia T

    Barhoumi, Karim and de Carvalho, Fabia A. and Gorbanyov, Michael and Kido, Yosuke and Koll, David and Ostojic, Dragana and Shang, Baoping and Tamirisa, Natalia T. and Toms, Sally and Dabla-Norris, Era and Nguyen, Anh D. M. and Zhao, Yunhui , title =. IMF Notes , year =

  41. [49]

    International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance , year =

    Johansen, Anders and Ledoit, Olivier and Sornette, Didier , title =. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance , year =

  42. [50]

    , title =

    Jovanovic, Boyan and Rousseau, Peter L. , title =. Handbook of Economic Growth , editor =. 2005 , volume =

    2005

  43. [51]

    , title =

    Kindleberger, Charles P. , title =. 1978 , address =

    1978

  44. [52]

    2018 , address =

    L\'opez de Prado, Marcos , title =. 2018 , address =

    2018

  45. [53]

    The State of AI: Global Survey 2025 , year =

    2025

  46. [54]

    , title =

    Merton, Robert C. , title =. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science , year =

  47. [55]

    , title =

    Miller, Edward M. , title =. Journal of Finance , year =

  48. [56]

    , title =

    Minsky, Hyman P. , title =

  49. [57]

    Science , year =

    Noy, Shakked and Zhang, Whitney , title =. Science , year =

  50. [58]

    NVIDIA Announces Financial Results for First Quarter Fiscal 2027 , year =

    2027

  51. [59]

    Journal of Finance , year =

    Ofek, Eli and Richardson, Matthew , title =. Journal of Finance , year =

  52. [60]

    Technological Revolutions and Stock Prices , journal =

    P. Technological Revolutions and Stock Prices , journal =. 2009 , volume =

    2009

  53. [61]

    2002 , address =

    Perez, Carlota , title =. 2002 , address =

    2002

  54. [62]

    Phillips, Peter C. B. and Wu, Yangru and Yu, Jun , title =. International Economic Review , year =

  55. [63]

    Phillips, Peter C. B. and Shi, Shuping and Yu, Jun , title =. International Economic Review , year =

  56. [64]

    Q4 2025 AI VC Trends , year =

    2025

  57. [65]

    2026 AI Performance Study , year =

    2026

  58. [66]

    , title =

    Ross, Stephen A. , title =. Journal of Economic Theory , year =

  59. [67]

    , title =

    Samuelson, Paul A. , title =. Industrial Management Review , year =

  60. [68]

    and Woodford, Michael , title =

    Santos, Manuel S. and Woodford, Michael , title =. Econometrica , year =

  61. [69]

    and Xiong, Wei , title =

    Scheinkman, Jose A. and Xiong, Wei , title =. Journal of Political Economy , year =

  62. [70]

    , title =

    Schumpeter, Joseph A. , title =. 1942 , address =

    1942

  63. [71]

    , title =

    Shiller, Robert J. , title =. American Economic Review , year =

  64. [72]

    , title =

    Shiller, Robert J. , title =. 2000 , address =

    2000

  65. [73]

    , title =

    Shleifer, Andrei and Vishny, Robert W. , title =. Journal of Finance , year =

  66. [74]

    Quantitative Finance , year =

    Sirignano, Justin and Cont, Rama , title =. Quantitative Finance , year =

  67. [75]

    Quantitative Finance , year =

    Sornette, Didier and Johansen, Anders , title =. Quantitative Finance , year =

  68. [76]

    2003 , address =

    Sornette, Didier , title =. 2003 , address =

    2003

  69. [77]

    The 2026 AI Index Report , year =

    2026

  70. [78]

    , title =

    Stiglitz, Joseph E. , title =. Journal of Economic Perspectives , year =

  71. [79]

    Econometrica , year =

    Tirole, Jean , title =. Econometrica , year =

  72. [80]

    Proceedings of the Second IEEE Annual Conference on Neural Networks , year =

    White, Halbert , title =. Proceedings of the Second IEEE Annual Conference on Neural Networks , year =

  73. [81]

    and Brunnermeier, M

    Abreu, D. and Brunnermeier, M. K. (2003). Bubbles and crashes. Econometrica , 71(1):173--204

    2003

  74. [82]

    Acemoglu, D. (2024). The simple macroeconomics of ai. NBER Working Paper 32487, National Bureau of Economic Research

    2024

  75. [83]

    and Restrepo, P

    Acemoglu, D. and Restrepo, P. (2018). Artificial intelligence, automation, and work. NBER Working Paper 24196, National Bureau of Economic Research

    2018

  76. [84]

    Agrawal, A., Gans, J., and Goldfarb, A. (2018). Prediction Machines: The Simple Economics of Artificial Intelligence . Harvard Business Review Press, Boston

    2018

  77. [85]

    The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda

    Agrawal, A., Gans, J., and Goldfarb, A., editors (2019). The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda . University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    2019

  78. [86]

    and Gale, D

    Allen, F. and Gale, D. (2000). Bubbles and crises. The Economic Journal , 110(460):236--255

    2000

  79. [87]

    Arrow, K. J. (1953). Le r\^ole des valeurs boursi\`eres pour la r\'epartition la meilleure des risques. In Econom\'etrie , pages 41--47. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris

    1953

  80. [88]

    Bachelier, L. (1900). Th\'eorie de la sp\'eculation . Gauthier-Villars, Paris. Originally published in Annales scientifiques de l'\'Ecole Normale Sup\'erieure, 17, 21--86

    1900

  81. [89]

    Barberis, N., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. (1998). A model of investor sentiment. Journal of Financial Economics , 49(3):307--343

    1998

  82. [90]

    A., Gorbanyov, M., Kido, Y., Koll, D., Ostojic, D., Shang, B., Tamirisa, N

    Barhoumi, K., de Carvalho, F. A., Gorbanyov, M., Kido, Y., Koll, D., Ostojic, D., Shang, B., Tamirisa, N. T., Toms, S., Dabla-Norris, E., Nguyen, A. D. M., and Zhao, Y. (2026). Global economic and financial implications of artificial intelligence: Lessons from a scenario plann...

    2026

  83. [91]

    and Scholes, M

    Black, F. and Scholes, M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy , 81(3):637--654

    1973

  84. [92]

    Blanchard, O. J. and Watson, M. W. (1982). Bubbles, rational expectations and financial markets. In Wachtel, P., editor, Crises in the Economic and Financial Structure , pages 295--315. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA

    1982

  85. [93]

    Breeden, D. T. and Litzenberger, R. H. (1978). Prices of state-contingent claims implicit in option prices. Journal of Business , 51(4):621--651

    1978

  86. [94]

    Brunnermeier, M. K. (2008). Bubbles. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

    2008

  87. [95]

    Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D., and Raymond, L. R. (2025). Generative ai at work. The Quarterly Journal of Economics , 140(2):889--942

    2025

  88. [96]

    Brynjolfsson, E., Rock, D., and Syverson, C. (2021). The productivity j-curve: How intangibles complement general purpose technologies. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics , 13(1):333--372

    2021

  89. [97]

    Cao, Z., Shao, X., Yan, Y., and Geman, H. (2025). Identifying and quantifying financial bubbles with the hyped log-periodic power law model

    2025

  90. [98]

    State of ai 2025 report

    CB Insights (2026). State of ai 2025 report. Research report, January 2026

    2026

  91. [99]

    Chen, K. (2026). Machine learning in finance from the first neural-network forecasts to agentic ai: A review summary of applications, evidence, and open problems, 1988--2026. Manuscript under review

    2026

  92. [100]

    Chen, L., Pelger, M., and Zhu, J. (2024). Deep learning in asset pricing. Management Science , 70(2):714--750

    2024

  93. [101]

    Cochrane, J. H. (2005). Asset Pricing . Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, revised edition

    2005

  94. [102]

    David, P. A. (1990). The dynamo and the computer: An historical perspective on the modern productivity paradox. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings , 80(2):355--361

    1990

  95. [103]

    Debreu, G. (1959). Theory of Value: An Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium . Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

    1959

  96. [104]

    and Schachermayer, W

    Delbaen, F. and Schachermayer, W. (1994). A general version of the fundamental theorem of asset pricing. Mathematische Annalen , 300:463--520

    1994

  97. [105]

    R., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., Kellogg, K., Rajendran, S., Krayer, L., Candelon, F., and Lakhani, K

    Dell'Acqua, F., McFowland, E., Mollick, E. R., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., Kellogg, K., Rajendran, S., Krayer, L., Candelon, F., and Lakhani, K. R. (2023). Navigating the jagged technological frontier: Field experimental evidence of the effects of ai on knowledge worker productivity a...

    2023

  98. [106]

    F., Halperin, I., and Bilokon, P

    Dixon, M. F., Halperin, I., and Bilokon, P. (2020). Machine Learning in Finance: From Theory to Practice . Springer, Cham

    2020

  99. [107]

    Duffie, D. (2001). Dynamic Asset Pricing Theory . Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, third edition

    2001

  100. [108]

    Eloundou, T., Manning, S., Mishkin, P., and Rock, D. (2023). Gpts are gpts: An early look at the labor market impact potential of large language models

    2023

  101. [109]

    Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance , 25(2):383--417

    1970

  102. [110]

    Fama, E. F. (2014). Two pillars of asset pricing. American Economic Review , 104(6):1467--1485

    2014

  103. [111]

    W., Raj, M., and Seamans, R

    Felten, E. W., Raj, M., and Seamans, R. (2021). Occupational, industry, and geographic exposure to artificial intelligence: A novel dataset and its potential uses. Strategic Management Journal , 42(12):2195--2217

    2021

  104. [112]

    and Sornette, D

    Filimonov, V. and Sornette, D. (2013). A stable and robust calibration scheme of the log-periodic power law model. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , 392(17):3698--3707

    2013

  105. [113]

    Fisher, I. (1930). The Theory of Interest . Macmillan, New York

    1930

  106. [114]

    and Seamans, R

    Furman, J. and Seamans, R. (2019). Ai and the economy. Innovation Policy and the Economy , 19:161--191

    2019

  107. [115]

    Tracking trillions: The assumptions shaping the scale of the ai build-out

    Goldman Sachs Global Institute (2026). Tracking trillions: The assumptions shaping the scale of the ai build-out. Published May 1, 2026

    2026

  108. [116]

    and Shleifer, A

    Greenwood, R. and Shleifer, A. (2014). Expectations of returns and expected returns. Review of Financial Studies , 27(3):714--746

    2014

  109. [117]

    Greenwood, R., Shleifer, A., and You, Y. (2019). Bubbles for fama. Journal of Financial Economics , 131(1):20--43

    2019

  110. [118]

    Grossman, S. J. and Stiglitz, J. E. (1980). On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. American Economic Review , 70(3):393--408

    1980

  111. [119]

    Gu, S., Kelly, B., and Xiu, D. (2020). Empirical asset pricing via machine learning. Review of Financial Studies , 33(5):2223--2273

    2020

  112. [120]

    Hansen, L. P. and Jagannathan, R. (1991). Implications of security market data for models of dynamic economies. Journal of Political Economy , 99(2):225--262

    1991

  113. [121]

    Harrison, J. M. and Kreps, D. M. (1978). Speculative investor behavior in a stock market with heterogeneous expectations. Quarterly Journal of Economics , 92(2):323--336

    1978

  114. [122]

    Harrison, J. M. and Kreps, D. M. (1979). Martingales and arbitrage in multiperiod securities markets. Journal of Economic Theory , 20(3):381--408

    1979

  115. [123]

    Harrison, J. M. and Pliska, S. R. (1981). Martingales and stochastic integrals in the theory of continuous trading. Stochastic Processes and their Applications , 11(3):215--260

    1981

  116. [124]

    B., Polson, N

    Heaton, J. B., Polson, N. G., and Witte, J. H. (2017). Deep learning for finance: Deep portfolios. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry , 33(1):3--12

    2017

  117. [125]

    Hong, H., Scheinkman, J., and Xiong, W. (2006). Asset float and speculative bubbles. Journal of Finance , 61(3):1073--1117

    2006

  118. [126]

    M., Lo, A

    Hutchinson, J. M., Lo, A. W., and Poggio, T. (1994). A nonparametric approach to pricing and hedging derivative securities via learning networks. Journal of Finance , 49(3):851--889

    1994

  119. [127]

    Key questions on energy and ai

    International Energy Agency (2026). Key questions on energy and ai. Published April 16, 2026

    2026

  120. [128]

    Johansen, A., Ledoit, O., and Sornette, D. (2000). Crashes as critical points. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance , 3(2):219--255

    2000

  121. [129]

    and Rousseau, P

    Jovanovic, B. and Rousseau, P. L. (2005). General purpose technologies. In Aghion, P. and Durlauf, S. N., editors, Handbook of Economic Growth , volume 1B, pages 1181--1224. Elsevier

    2005

  122. [130]

    Kindleberger, C. P. (1978). Manias, Panics, and Crashes: A History of Financial Crises . Basic Books, New York

    1978

  123. [131]

    L\'opez de Prado, M. (2018). Advances in Financial Machine Learning . Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    2018

  124. [132]

    The state of ai: Global survey 2025

    McKinsey QuantumBlack (2025). The state of ai: Global survey 2025. Global survey report

    2025

  125. [133]

    Merton, R. C. (1973). Theory of rational option pricing. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science , 4(1):141--183

    1973

  126. [134]

    Miller, E. M. (1977). Risk, uncertainty, and divergence of opinion. Journal of Finance , 32(4):1151--1168

    1977

  127. [135]

    Minsky, H. P. (1992). The financial instability hypothesis. Working Paper 74, Levy Economics Institute of Bard College

    1992

  128. [136]

    and Zhang, W

    Noy, S. and Zhang, W. (2023). Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science , 381(6654):187--192

    2023

  129. [137]

    Nvidia announces financial results for first quarter fiscal 2027

    NVIDIA Corporation (2026). Nvidia announces financial results for first quarter fiscal 2027. Press release, May 20, 2026

    2026

  130. [138]

    and Richardson, M

    Ofek, E. and Richardson, M. (2003). Dotcom mania: The rise and fall of internet stock prices. Journal of Finance , 58(3):1113--1137

    2003

  131. [139]

    and Veronesi, P

    P \'a stor, L . and Veronesi, P. (2009). Technological revolutions and stock prices. American Economic Review , 99(4):1451--1483

    2009

  132. [140]

    Perez, C. (2002). Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital: The Dynamics of Bubbles and Golden Ages . Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK

    2002

  133. [141]

    Phillips, P. C. B., Shi, S., and Yu, J. (2015a). Testing for multiple bubbles: Historical episodes of exuberance and collapse in the s&p 500. International Economic Review , 56(4):1043--1078

  134. [142]

    Phillips, P. C. B., Shi, S., and Yu, J. (2015b). Testing for multiple bubbles: Limit theory of real-time detectors. International Economic Review , 56(4):1079--1134

  135. [143]

    Phillips, P. C. B., Wu, Y., and Yu, J. (2011). Explosive behavior in the 1990s nasdaq: When did exuberance escalate asset values? International Economic Review , 52(1):201--226

    2011

  136. [144]

    Q4 2025 ai vc trends

    PitchBook (2026). Q4 2025 ai vc trends. Research report, February 2026

    2026

  137. [145]

    2026 ai performance study

    PwC (2026). 2026 ai performance study. Survey report

    2026

  138. [146]

    Ross, S. A. (1976). The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing. Journal of Economic Theory , 13(3):341--360

    1976

  139. [147]

    Samuelson, P. A. (1965). Proof that properly anticipated prices fluctuate randomly. Industrial Management Review , 6(2):41--49

    1965

  140. [148]

    Santos, M. S. and Woodford, M. (1997). Rational asset pricing bubbles. Econometrica , 65(1):19--57

    1997

  141. [149]

    Scheinkman, J. A. and Xiong, W. (2003). Overconfidence and speculative bubbles. Journal of Political Economy , 111(6):1183--1220

    2003

  142. [150]

    Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy . Harper and Brothers, New York

    1942

  143. [151]

    Shiller, R. J. (1981). Do stock prices move too much to be justified by subsequent changes in dividends? American Economic Review , 71(3):421--436

    1981

  144. [152]

    Shiller, R. J. (2000). Irrational Exuberance . Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    2000

  145. [153]

    and Vishny, R

    Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W. (1997). The limits of arbitrage. Journal of Finance , 52(1):35--55

    1997

  146. [154]

    and Cont, R

    Sirignano, J. and Cont, R. (2019). Universal features of price formation in financial markets: Perspectives from deep learning. Quantitative Finance , 19(9):1449--1459

    2019

  147. [155]

    Sornette, D. (2003). Why Stock Markets Crash: Critical Events in Complex Financial Systems . Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    2003

  148. [156]

    and Johansen, A

    Sornette, D. and Johansen, A. (2001). Significance of log-periodic precursors to financial crashes. Quantitative Finance , 1(4):452--471

    2001

  149. [157]

    The 2026 ai index report

    Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (2026). The 2026 ai index report. Annual report

    2026

  150. [158]

    Stiglitz, J. E. (1990). Symposium on bubbles. Journal of Economic Perspectives , 4(2):13--18

    1990

  151. [159]

    Tirole, J. (1985). Asset bubbles and overlapping generations. Econometrica , 53(6):1499--1528

    1985

  152. [160]

    White, H. (1988). Economic prediction using neural networks: The case of ibm daily stock returns. In Proceedings of the Second IEEE Annual Conference on Neural Networks , volume 2, pages 451--458

    1988

  153. [161]

    Historical developments in probability measures for asset pricing: From state prices to modern pricing kernels

    Zhang Chen and Chen Kay (2026). Historical developments in probability measures for asset pricing: From state prices to modern pricing kernels

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed June 28, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.