Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 221 references

Gaussian FSBP operators: Comparison and application to numerical methods for hyperbolic conservation laws

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that open generalized Gaussian quadrature constructs summation-by-parts operators for non-polynomial function spaces with exactly one fewer grid point than closed rules, and that with function-space-exact extrapolation they

desk verdict Open GGQs give a clean one-node saving over closed GGQs and hold up in nontrivial hyperbolic tests; the Bessel rank discrepancy is a verifiability problem, not a demonstrated error. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.13224 v1 pith:FRLH46U2 submitted 2026-07-14 math.NA cs.NA

Jan Glaubitz , Henry Haase , Philipp Öffner , Finnja Stafforst This is my paper
classification math.NAcs.NA MSC 65N1265D25
keywords FSBPoperatorsgeneralizedGaussianquadratureopenrulessummation-by-partsnon-polynomialapproximationspaceshyperbolicconservationlawsextrapolationChebyshevsets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper extends function-space summation-by-parts (FSBP) operators—discrete derivative operators that mimic integration by parts for general, non-polynomial approximation spaces—to grids that omit the interval endpoints, and shows that open generalized Gaussian quadratures (GGQs) build such operators with exactly one fewer grid point than closed GGQs while preserving exactness for the same space (F^2)′. The counting is simple: an open GGQ uses m interior nodes to integrate a 2m-dimensional system exactly, whereas a closed GGQ needs m+1 nodes with two pinned to the boundary, so N = ⌈dim((F^2)′)/2⌉ for open and one more for closed. To make open nodes usable, the paper constructs F-exact extrapolation operators that recover boundary and interface values from interior nodes, and assembles the boundary matrix B = t_R t_R^T − t_L t_L^T. On the 1-D compressible Euler equations, scaled exponential open operators reach experimental convergence equal to their number of nodes, matching polynomial operators with the same node count, while fixed-scale exponentials degrade to second or third order. If the construction is right, open Gaussian FSBP operators are the most node-efficient structure-preserving discretizations of the tested non-polynomial spaces, and the same counting will apply to any admissible space.

What carries the argument

The central object is the (F^2)′-exact generalized Gaussian quadrature in its open form: m interior nodes and positive weights that integrate the 2m-dimensional space (F^2)′ exactly, hence with dim((F^2)′)=M requiring N=⌈M/2⌉ nodes, versus m+1 for the closed form. The companion mechanism is the F-exact extrapolation operator E, whose rows are the least-squares evaluation vectors t_L, t_R mapping interior function values to the endpoints; the boundary matrix is B = t_R t_R^T − t_L t_L^T, so that f^T B g = fg| boundaries, preserving the discrete integration-by-parts property on point sets that exclude the endpoints.

What would settle it

On the Bessel space spanned by J_0,…,J_9 on [0,25], independently recompute dim((F^2)′) and test the published 14-node rule for exactness on an L2-orthogonal basis of that space; if the true dimension is 48 (as a related study reported) rather than 27, or if any of the 27 exactness conditions fail by more than quadrature roundoff, the claimed 14-node exact open rule—and with it the one-fewer-node advantage in that example—collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is a counting statement plus an operationalization. For a finite-dimensional function space F ⊂ C^1, an FSBP operator exists exactly when a positive quadrature exact for (F^2)′ = {(fg)′ | f,g∈F} exists. Generalized Gaussian quadrature theory provides such quadratures with minimal node counts: an open GGQ has N = ⌈dim((F^2)′)/2⌉ nodes, and a closed GGQ has exactly one more. The paper constructs these open FSBP operators by first computing the open GGQ on (F^2)′, setting the norm matrix P to the quadrature weights, and recovering the antisymmetric part of Q from Q_A V = P V′ – BV/2; the boundary matrix B is built from least-squares F-exact extrapolation of the solution to the

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that for each function space F, the derivative-product space (F^2)′ is (or can be enriched to) a Chebyshev set, so that a positive open generalized Gaussian quadrature with exactly ⌈dim((F^2)′)/2⌉ nodes exists and can actually be computed; the paper itself observes this can fail, as the standard algorithm did not converge for the Bessel space.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any Chebyshev-admissible function space, open GGQs cut the node count for structure-preserving differentiation from N to N−1 relative to closed GGQs, narrowing the gap to the interpolatory ideal N = dim(F).
  • Open Gaussian FSBP operators make non-polynomial spaces practical in time-dependent conservation-law solvers: in the Euler test, scaled exponential operators reached the same experimental order of convergence as polynomial operators with the same node count.
  • The exactness gain is real: a four-node open operator can be exact on a larger space than a four-node closed operator, which translates into smaller errors at equal degrees of freedom (observed in the exponential boundary-layer advection test).
  • Closed GGQs remain optimal among operators that include both boundary nodes, so the choice between open and closed is a trade-off between node efficiency and having boundary data directly available.
  • The extrapolation step is the price of openness; without a stable F-exact extrapolation operator, the open construction does not yield a usable boundary or inter-element coupling.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the counting identity N = ⌈dim((F^2)′)/2⌉ suggests an information-theoretic floor for any F-exact FSBP operator: no discretization of a space whose derivative products span M dimensions can use fewer than ⌈M/2⌉ degrees of freedom and remain exact, so open GGQ constructions are optimal whenever they exist.
  • Editorial inference: the same open-GGQ construction can be transplanted to other nodal methods—discontinuous Galerkin and flux-reconstruction schemes built on non-polynomial bases would inherit the node savings, though they would also inherit the need for extrapolated interface values.
  • Editorial inference: the Bessel-space episode indicates that the practical bottleneck is not the counting but the computation: when the standard GGQ algorithm fails to converge, dimension determination by numerical rank becomes the deciding step; an independent check of exactness of the published 14-node rule on all 27 basis functions would settle whether the reported savings are realized.
  • Editorial inference: a testable extension is to run adaptive local scaling for exponential spaces so that the basis is matched to element width (as the 'scaled' operators do) and check whether the node-order convergence persists for systems with shocks and non-smooth data.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper develops generalized function-space summation-by-parts (FSBP) operators on grids that need not include the interval endpoints, constructs F-exact extrapolation/boundary operators for such grids, and builds FSBP operators from open and closed generalized Gaussian quadratures (GGQs). The central claim is that an open GGQ exact for a 2m-dimensional system uses m interior nodes, while a closed GGQ needs m+1 nodes, so open Gaussian FSBP operators are one node more efficient than closed ones whenever an open formulation is admissible. The authors compare the resulting operators with least-squares FSBP operators and the closed GGQ operators of [33], and apply them to linear advection, Burgers, and compressible Euler problems, reporting improved accuracy at equal degrees of freedom and experimental orders of convergence equal to the node count for scaled exponential spaces.

Significance. If the construction and the reported quadratures are sound, the paper makes a useful contribution: it provides a clean extension of the FSBP framework to open grids, introduces F-exact extrapolation operators in this setting, and demonstrates that open GGQ-based operators can match or beat closed ones on non-polynomial spaces in genuinely time-dependent nonlinear problems. The scaled-versus-fixed exponential study in Sec. 5.3 is a particularly honest and informative comparison. However, the theoretical counting claim is stated more generally than the construction supports, and the high-dimensional Bessel example, which is load-bearing for the efficiency claim, is not independently verifiable from the manuscript because no code or exactness residuals are supplied.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 6 and Lemma 2.4] The summary statement that 'an open GGQ thus requires N=ceil(M/2) points and a closed GGQ exactly one point more' is only valid when the resulting node count satisfies N >= dim(F), as required for the Vandermonde matrix in Lemma 2.4 to have linearly independent columns (and for the orthonormalization step in Algorithm 2.1 to be possible). For polynomial spaces, F=P_d, one has M=dim((F^2)')=2d, so the minimal open GGQ has d nodes, strictly fewer than dim(P_d)=d+1; no F-exact FSBP operator exists at that node count (e.g., the 2-point Gauss rule on P_2 cannot satisfy the x^2 derivative condition). All examples in Secs. 4-5 satisfy M>=2K (after enrichment in the E_2 case), so the issue does not invalidate those operators, but the general claim in Sec. 6 is false as written. Please restrict the counting statement to M>=2K (or N>=dim(F)) and discuss the polynomial case explicitly.
  2. [Sec. 4.3, Remark 4.1, Tables 2-3] The Bessel example is load-bearing for the claimed one-node saving in a high-dimensional setting, but the reported dimension dim G=27 versus [33]'s 48 rests on a numerical SVD rank decision with a 10^-14 sigma_max threshold and on an approximate Gauss-Legendre Gram matrix. No code or scripts are provided, so the assertion that [33]'s value is 'incorrect' cannot be checked. If dim G were 48, a 14-node open rule with 28 parameters could not be exact for a 48-dimensional space, and Table 2 would not define an F-exact FSBP operator; the comparison in Table 3 would then be invalid. Please provide a reproducible script and report exactness residuals, e.g., max_{mu,nu} |∫ (J_mu J_nu)' dx - sum_i w_i (J_mu J_nu)'(x_i)| for all 55 pairs, computed in high precision and with a well-conditioned rank determination. It would also help to state whether the measure-continuation method [67] is known to g
minor comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (3.2)] In Definition 3.1, the closed GGQ formula sums from i=1 to m, but the rule has m+1 nodes and weights; the upper limit should be m+1. As written, the formula is internally inconsistent.
  2. [Sec. 4.3, Sec. 5.3, Sec. 6] There are several cross-reference errors: the text refers to 'Theorem 4.1 below' where the actual item is Remark 4.1; Sec. 6 cites 'Theorem 3.3' for the surplus-degrees-of-freedom discussion, but only Remark 3.3 exists; and Sec. 5.3 refers to 'Theorem 5.1' when it means Remark 5.1.
  3. [Sec. 4.3, Table 1 caption] The caption 'not exact for (F^2)' is a conclusion drawn from the authors' own rank computation. Since the table reports a rule from [33], it would be clearer to label it as 'claimed by [33] to be exact; the present authors find it not exact,' so that the reader can distinguish the data from the interpretation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the efficiency claim is an acknowledged counting consequence and the numerical comparisons are self-contained.

full rationale

The derivation chain does not reduce to its inputs. The central existence result (Lemma 2.4) is quoted from the published FSBP theory in [28] and used as a building block; the generalized Gaussian quadrature construction is taken from external sources [39, 67]. The efficiency comparison between open and closed GGQs is explicitly acknowledged in Section 6 as a counting statement: an open GGQ uses m interior nodes for a 2m-dimensional system while a closed GGQ uses m+1 nodes. This is an immediate consequence of Definition 3.1 rather than a fitted prediction, and the paper presents it honestly as such. The numerical experiments compare open and closed Gaussian FSBP operators against least-squares FSBP operators and polynomial SBP operators, with errors and EOCs reported from actual computations; no parameter is fitted to the target convergence rates. The paper is also transparent about its fragile assumptions: the Chebyshev-set premise in Section 3.1, the failure of Huybrechs' algorithm for the Bessel space (Section 4.3), and the SVD rank threshold 10^-14 sigma_max in Remark 4.1. These are correctness risks, not circularity. Many FSBP references are by the same authors, but they serve as normal framework citations and the comparison to [33] is external. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter or to an unverified self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central construction rests on the existence of positive, exact open GGQs for the (F^2)' spaces and on the F-exactness of the least-squares boundary extrapolation. No physical entities are introduced; the free parameters are construction and modeling choices (enrichment function, scale, SVD threshold) rather than fitted constants. The Chebyshev-set assumption is the most fragile premise, as the paper itself demonstrates in the Bessel example.

free parameters (4)
  • enrichment function for even dimension = x^2 for E_2; constant 1 for Bessel-space G
    Appended to (F^2)' to reach even dimension required by the Chebyshev-set algorithm (Sec. 3.1, Sec. 4.3); choice affects the resulting quadrature but is not fitted to data.
  • SVD rank threshold = 10^-14 * sigma_max
    Used in Remark 4.1 to declare dim G=27 for Bessel; if this threshold is wrong, the 14-node open rule is not exact, load-bearing for the Bessel comparison against [33].
  • fine Gauss-Legendre rule for Gram matrix = high-order Gauss-Legendre rule
    Used in Remark 4.1 to approximate L2 inner products, 'treated as exact' in Eq. (4.10); quadrature error is neglected.
  • exponential scale b = b=h (scaled) or b=1 (fixed)
    The exponential spaces E_d are translation invariant but not scale invariant (Remark 5.1); b must be chosen by hand. Fixed b=1 loses convergence order in the Euler experiments, making the claimed advantages conditional on scale-matching.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption (F^2)' forms a Chebyshev set
    Sec. 3.1, Definition 3.2 and the application to FSBP: 'Since the construction of FSBP operators requires an (F^2)'-exact quadrature, we assume that a basis of (F^2)' forms a Chebyshev set.' Load-bearing for existence of open GGQs with the claimed number of nodes.
  • standard math Existence of an F-exact FSBP operator iff there exists a positive (F^2)'-exact quadrature (Lemma 2.4, from [28, Cor 4.6])
    Lemma 2.4 invokes [28, Corollary 4.6] equating FSBP existence with positive (F^2)'-exact quadrature; the paper generalizes it to open grids but relies on the cited result.
  • standard math Least-squares projection onto F evaluated at boundary gives an exact boundary operator
    Sec. 2.3, Eqs. (2.7)-(2.11): relies on the projection being identity on F and boundary values representable by t_L, t_R; standard linear algebra.
  • domain assumption The GGQ construction algorithms ([39], [67]) produce the claimed positive and exact quadratures for the specific spaces
    The paper adapts [39] but reports it 'failed to converge' for the Bessel case (Sec. 4.3), where [67] is used; correctness for the tested (F^2)' spaces is not proven in the paper, only asserted through the numerical results.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gaussian FSBP operators: Comparison and application to numerical methods for hyperbolic conservation laws." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FRLH46U2

@misc{pith2026260713224,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gaussian FSBP operators: Comparison and application to numerical methods for hyperbolic conservation laws},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FRLH46U2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.13224}
}
read the original abstract

Function-space summation-by-parts (FSBP) operators enable conservative and energy-stable numerical methods for hyperbolic conservation laws based on general, non-polynomial approximation spaces. Recent works show that using generalized Gaussian quadrature significantly reduces the number of grid points required compared to existing constructions that have mostly focused on equidistant grids. In this paper, we compare open and closed FSBP operators constructed with generalized Gaussian quadratures and apply them to numerically solve hyperbolic conservation laws. Furthermore, to support open node distributions, we extend the FSBP framework by introducing function-space exact extrapolation operators and operationalize them in numerical schemes for solving hyperbolic conservation laws. Our numerical experiments include the one-dimensional linear advection, non-viscous Burgers, and compressible Euler equations of gas dynamics. We observe that applying FSBP operators in numerical schemes can improve efficiency and accuracy. Notably, we demonstrate these advantages in more challenging time-dependent settings compared to other recent works on Gaussian FSBP operators.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.13224 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Illustration of the first iteration of the algorithm in [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Errors of the numerical solutions for the inhomogeneous linear advection equation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Errors of the numerical solutions for the inviscid Burgers equation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: L 2 -error of ρ at T = 2 versus degrees of freedom; legend EOCs from the two finest levels [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: L∞-error of ρ at T = 2 versus degrees of freedom; legend EOCs from the two finest levels [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

221 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages

  1. [33]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume=

    High-order entropy stable finite difference schemes for nonlinear conservation laws: Finite domains , author=. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  2. [4]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.10786 , year=

    Why summation by parts is not enough , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.10786 , year=

    arXiv

  3. [67]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume=

    Encapsulated high order difference operators on curvilinear non-conforming grids , author=. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  4. [1]

    Grant, Michael and Boyd, Stephen , year=

  5. [2]

    2021 , url =

    Glaubitz, Jan , title =. 2021 , url =

    2021

  6. [3]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.23306 , year=

    Summation-by-parts operators for general function spaces: optimal nodes , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.23306 , year=

    arXiv

  7. [5]

    , journal=

    Bercik, Alex and Patrascu, Lisa and Zingg, David W. , journal=. Construction and Optimization of Summation-by-Parts Operators for General Function Spaces Using an Improved Generalized

  8. [6]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.21442 , year=

    Towards provable energy-stable overset grid methods using sub-cell summation-by-parts operators , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.21442 , year=

    arXiv

Show all 221 references
  1. [7]

    Journal of Scientific Computing , volume=

    An Optimization-Based Construction Procedure for Function Space-Based Summation-by-Parts Operators on Arbitrary Grids , author=. Journal of Scientific Computing , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  2. [8]

    Journal of Scientific Computing , volume=

    Energy-stable global radial basis function methods on summation-by-parts form , author=. Journal of Scientific Computing , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  3. [9]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume=

    Summation-by-parts operators for general function spaces: The second derivative , author=. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  4. [10]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume=

    Multi-dimensional summation-by-parts operators for general function spaces: Theory and construction , author=. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=

  5. [11]

    SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis , volume=

    Summation-by-parts operators for general function spaces , author=. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  6. [12]

    Malabar , year=

    Difference methods for initial-value problems , author=. Malabar , year=

  7. [13]

    Mathematical Aspects of Finite Elements in Partial Differential Equations , pages=

    Finite element and finite difference methods for hyperbolic partial differential equations , author=. Mathematical Aspects of Finite Elements in Partial Differential Equations , pages=. 1974 , publisher=

    1974

  8. [14]

    1977 , publisher=

    On the existence of energy estimates for difference approximations for hyperbolic systems , author=. 1977 , publisher=

    1977

  9. [15]

    1977 , school=

    On energy estimates for difference approximations to hyperbolic partial differential equations , author=. 1977 , school=

    1977

  10. [16]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume=

    Summation by parts for finite difference approximations for d/dx , author=. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 1994 , publisher=

    1994

  11. [17]

    Applied Numerical Mathematics , volume=

    Finite volume approximations and strict stability for hyperbolic problems , author=. Applied Numerical Mathematics , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

    2001

  12. [18]

    New Zealand J

    Skew-adjoint finite difference methods on nonuniform grids , author=. New Zealand J. Math , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

    2003

  13. [19]

    Applied Numerical Mathematics , volume=

    Finite volume methods, unstructured meshes and strict stability for hyperbolic problems , author=. Applied Numerical Mathematics , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

    2003

  14. [20]

    Journal of Scientific Computing , volume=

    On coordinate transformations for summation-by-parts operators , author=. Journal of Scientific Computing , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  15. [21]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume=

    Summation by parts operators for finite difference approximations of second derivatives , author=. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  16. [22]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume=

    Higher entropy conservation and numerical stability of compressible turbulence simulations , author=. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  17. [23]

    Journal of Scientific Computing , volume=

    Conservative finite difference formulations, variable coefficients, energy estimates and artificial dissipation , author=. Journal of Scientific Computing , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  18. [24]

    Journal of Scientific Computing , volume=

    The construction of discretely conservative finite volume schemes that also globally conserve energy or entropy , author=. Journal of Scientific Computing , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  19. [25]

    Chiu, Edmond Kwan-Yu and Wang, Qiqi and Hu, Rui and Jameson, Antony , title =. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. , issn =. 2012 , language =. doi:10.1137/110842740 , keywords =

    2012 doi

  20. [26]

    A systematic methodology for constructing high-order energy stable

    Yamaleev, Nail K and Carpenter, Mark H , journal=. A systematic methodology for constructing high-order energy stable. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  21. [27]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume=

    Boundary closures for fourth-order energy stable weighted essentially non-oscillatory finite-difference schemes , author=. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  22. [28]

    A comparison of the dispersion and dissipation errors of

    Gassner, Gregor and Kopriva, David A , journal=. A comparison of the dispersion and dissipation errors of. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  23. [29]

    SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing , volume=

    A conservative mesh-free scheme and generalized framework for conservation laws , author=. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  24. [30]

    Discretely conservative finite-difference formulations for nonlinear conservation laws in split form:

    Fisher, Travis C and Carpenter, Mark H and Nordstr. Discretely conservative finite-difference formulations for nonlinear conservation laws in split form:. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  25. [31]

    A skew-symmetric discontinuous

    Gassner, Gregor J , journal=. A skew-symmetric discontinuous. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  26. [32]

    High-Order Entropy Stable Finite Difference Schemes for Nonlinear Conservation Laws:

    Fisher, Travis C and Carpenter, Mark H , institution=. High-Order Entropy Stable Finite Difference Schemes for Nonlinear Conservation Laws:. 2013 , type=

    2013

  27. [34]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume=

    Summation-by-parts in time , author=. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  28. [35]

    Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics , volume=

    Summation-by-parts operators and high-order quadrature , author=. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  29. [36]

    Lundquist, Tomas and Nordstr. The. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  30. [37]

    Optimal diagonal-norm

    Mattsson, Ken and Almquist, Martin and Carpenter, Mark H , journal=. Optimal diagonal-norm. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  31. [38]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume=

    Review of summation-by-parts schemes for initial--boundary-value problems , author=. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  32. [39]

    2014 , volume=

    Review of Summation-by-Parts Operators with Simultaneous Approximation Terms for the Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations , author=. 2014 , volume=. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.02.016 , journal=

    2014 doi

  33. [40]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume=

    A generalized framework for nodal first derivative summation-by-parts operators , author=. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  34. [41]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume=

    Diagonal-norm summation by parts operators for finite difference approximations of third and fourth derivatives , author=. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  35. [42]

    Entropy stable spectral collocation schemes for the

    Carpenter, Mark H and Fisher, Travis C and Nielsen, Eric J and Frankel, Steven H , journal=. Entropy stable spectral collocation schemes for the. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  36. [43]

    SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing , volume=

    High-order implicit time-marching methods based on generalized summation-by-parts operators , author=. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  37. [44]

    Split form nodal discontinuous

    Gassner, Gregor J and Winters, Andrew R and Kopriva, David A , journal=. Split form nodal discontinuous. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  38. [45]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume=

    Summation-by-parts operators for correction procedure via reconstruction , author=. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  39. [46]

    2016 , note=

    A provably stable, non-iterative domain decomposition technique for the advection-diffusion equation , author=. 2016 , note=

    2016

  40. [47]

    Handbook of Numerical Analysis , volume=

    Entropy stable summation-by-parts formulations for compressible computational fluid dynamics , author=. Handbook of Numerical Analysis , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  41. [48]

    SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing , volume=

    Multidimensional summation-by-parts operators: general theory and application to simplex elements , author=. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  42. [49]

    An entropy stable nodal discontinuous

    Wintermeyer, Niklas and Winters, Andrew R and Gassner, Gregor J and Kopriva, David A , journal=. An entropy stable nodal discontinuous. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  43. [50]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume=

    On conservation and stability properties for summation-by-parts schemes , author=. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  44. [51]

    Entropy stable high order discontinuous

    Chen, Tianheng and Shu, Chi-Wang , journal=. Entropy stable high order discontinuous. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  45. [52]

    Extended skew-symmetric form for summation-by-parts operators and varying

    Ranocha, Hendrik and. Extended skew-symmetric form for summation-by-parts operators and varying. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  46. [53]

    Diagonal-norm upwind

    Mattsson, Ken , journal=. Diagonal-norm upwind. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  47. [54]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume=

    Energy stable and high-order-accurate finite difference methods on staggered grids , author=. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  48. [55]

    ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis , volume=

    Stability of correction procedure via reconstruction with summation-by-parts operators for. ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  49. [56]

    On discretely entropy conservative and entropy stable discontinuous

    Chan, Jesse , journal=. On discretely entropy conservative and entropy stable discontinuous. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  50. [57]

    Entropy-stable summation-by-parts discretization of the

    Crean, Jared and Hicken, Jason E and Fern. Entropy-stable summation-by-parts discretization of the. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  51. [58]

    SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis , volume=

    On the order of accuracy of finite difference operators on diagonal norm based summation-by-parts form , author=. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  52. [59]

    Comparison of some entropy conservative numerical fluxes for the

    Ranocha, Hendrik , journal=. Comparison of some entropy conservative numerical fluxes for the. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  53. [60]

    Applied Numerical Mathematics , volume=

    Stability of artificial dissipation and modal filtering for flux reconstruction schemes using summation-by-parts operators , author=. Applied Numerical Mathematics , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  54. [61]

    2018 , publisher=

    Generalised Summation-by-Parts operators and Entropy Stability of Numerical Methods for Hyperbolic Balance Laws , author=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  55. [62]

    Journal of Scientific Computing , volume=

    Error boundedness of discontinuous. Journal of Scientific Computing , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  56. [63]

    Skew-symmetric entropy stable modal discontinuous

    Chan, Jesse , journal=. Skew-symmetric entropy stable modal discontinuous. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  57. [64]

    Efficient entropy stable

    Chan, Jesse and Del Rey Fern. Efficient entropy stable. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  58. [65]

    Journal of Scientific Computing , volume=

    Extension of tensor-product generalized and dense-norm summation-by-parts operators to curvilinear coordinates , author=. Journal of Scientific Computing , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  59. [66]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume=

    Staggered-grid entropy-stable multidimensional summation-by-parts discretizations on curvilinear coordinates , author=. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  60. [68]

    Energy stable boundary conditions for the nonlinear incompressible

    Nordstr. Energy stable boundary conditions for the nonlinear incompressible. Mathematics of Computation , volume=

  61. [69]

    Analysis of the

    Abgrall, R. Analysis of the. Journal of Scientific Computing , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  62. [70]

    Journal of Scientific Computing , volume=

    Entropy-stable, high-order summation-by-parts discretizations without interface penalties , author=. Journal of Scientific Computing , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  63. [71]

    Review of entropy stable discontinuous

    Chen, Tianheng and Shu, Chi-Wang , journal=. Review of entropy stable discontinuous

  64. [72]

    Properties of

    Linders, Viktor and Nordstr. Properties of. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  65. [73]

    Ranocha, Hendrik , Title =. J. Comput. Phys. , ISSN =. 2018 , Language =. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2018.02.021 , Keywords =

    2018 doi

  66. [74]

    Relaxation

    Ranocha, Hendrik and Sayyari, Mohammed and Dalcin, Lisandro and Parsani, Matteo and Ketcheson, David I , journal=. Relaxation. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  67. [75]

    Analysis of the

    Abgrall, R. Analysis of the. Communications on Applied Mathematics and Computation , pages=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  68. [76]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume=

    Learning to differentiate , author=. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  69. [77]

    Communications in Computational Physics , year=

    A Broad Class of Conservative Numerical Methods for Dispersive Wave Equations , author=. Communications in Computational Physics , year=

  70. [78]

    Journal of Scientific Computing , volume=

    A New Class of A Stable Summation by Parts Time Integration Schemes with Strong Initial Conditions , author=. Journal of Scientific Computing , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  71. [79]

    A flux-differencing formulation with

    Mateo-Gab. A flux-differencing formulation with. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  72. [80]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume=

    Constructing stable, high-order finite-difference operators on point clouds over complex geometries , author=. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  73. [81]

    2025 , eprint=

    Stability of the Active Flux Method in the Framework of Summation-by-Parts Operators , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  74. [82]

    Some new properties of the

    Abgrall, R\'. Some new properties of the. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  75. [83]

    1973 , institution=

    Triangular mesh methods for the neutron transport equation , author=. 1973 , institution=

    1973

  76. [84]

    Cockburn, Bernardo and Shu, Chi-Wang , journal=. The. 1991 , publisher=

    1991

  77. [85]

    Cockburn, Bernardo and Shu, Chi-Wang , journal=

  78. [86]

    1989 , publisher=

    Cockburn, Bernardo and Lin, San-Yih and Shu, Chi-Wang , journal=. 1989 , publisher=

    1989

  79. [87]

    Cockburn, Bernardo and Hou, Suchung and Shu, Chi-Wang , journal=. The

  80. [88]

    Cockburn, Bernardo and Shu, Chi-Wang , journal=. The. 1998 , publisher=

    1998

  81. [89]

    Computers & Fluids , volume=

    Residual distribution schemes: current status and future trends , author=. Computers & Fluids , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  82. [90]

    2007 , publisher=

    Nodal discontinuous Galerkin methods: algorithms, analysis, and applications , author=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  83. [91]

    2012 , publisher=

    Discontinuous Galerkin Methods: Theory, Computation and Applications , author=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  84. [92]

    A review of residual distribution schemes for hyperbolic and parabolic problems: The

    Abgrall, Remi , journal=. A review of residual distribution schemes for hyperbolic and parabolic problems: The. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  85. [93]

    A review of flux reconstruction or correction procedure via reconstruction method for the

    Wang, ZJ and Huynh, HT , journal=. A review of flux reconstruction or correction procedure via reconstruction method for the. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  86. [94]

    , Title =

    Abgrall, R. , Title =. J. Sci. Comput. , ISSN =. 2017 , Language =. doi:10.1007/s10915-017-0498-4 , Keywords =

    2017 doi

  87. [95]

    The study of building blocks for essentially non-oscillatory

    Christofi, Stavros N , year=. The study of building blocks for essentially non-oscillatory

  88. [96]

    On the structure of function spaces in optimal recovery of point functionals for

    Iske, Armin and Sonar, Thomas , journal=. On the structure of function spaces in optimal recovery of point functionals for. 1996 , publisher=

    1996

  89. [97]

    Computers & Mathematics with Applications , volume=

    Exponentially fitted spline in compression for the numerical solution of singular perturbation problems , author=. Computers & Mathematics with Applications , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

    2003

  90. [98]

    Applied Mathematics and Computation , volume=

    An exponentially fitted finite difference method for singular perturbation problems , author=. Applied Mathematics and Computation , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  91. [99]

    Locally divergence-free discontinuous

    Cockburn, Bernardo and Li, Fengyan and Shu, Chi-Wang , journal=. Locally divergence-free discontinuous. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  92. [100]

    Locally divergence-free discontinuous

    Li, Fengyan and Shu, Chi-Wang , journal=. Locally divergence-free discontinuous. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  93. [101]

    Discontinuous

    Yuan, Ling and Shu, Chi-Wang , journal=. Discontinuous. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  94. [102]

    A discontinuous enrichment method for the finite element solution of high

    Kalashnikova, Irina and Farhat, Charbel and Tezaur, Radek , journal=. A discontinuous enrichment method for the finite element solution of high. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  95. [103]

    2013 , publisher=

    Zhu, Jun and Qiu, Jianxian , journal=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  96. [104]

    A short note on the error estimates of

    Yang, Hyoseon and Yoon, Jungho , journal=. A short note on the error estimates of. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  97. [105]

    A Sixth-Order Weighted Essentially Non-oscillatory Schemes Based on Exponential Polynomials for

    Ha, Youngsoo and Kim, Chang Ho and Yang, Hyoseon and Yoon, Jungho , journal=. A Sixth-Order Weighted Essentially Non-oscillatory Schemes Based on Exponential Polynomials for. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  98. [106]

    Entropy stable essentially nonoscillatory methods based on

    Hesthaven, Jan S and M. Entropy stable essentially nonoscillatory methods based on. ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  99. [107]

    Improving accuracy of the fifth-order

    Ha, Youngsoo and Kim, Chang Ho and Yang, Hyoseon and Yoon, Jungho , journal=. Improving accuracy of the fifth-order. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  100. [108]

    On the Use of

    Watson, Rob and Trojak, Will , journal=. On the Use of

  101. [109]

    Approximately well-balanced Discontinuous

    Franck, Emmanuel and Michel-Dansac, Victor and Navoret, Laurent , journal=. Approximately well-balanced Discontinuous. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  102. [110]

    Acta Numerica , volume=

    Radial basis functions , author=. Acta Numerica , volume=. 2000 , publisher=

    2000

  103. [111]

    2003 , publisher=

    Radial Basis Functions: Theory and Implementations , author=. 2003 , publisher=

    2003

  104. [112]

    2004 , publisher=

    Scattered Data Approximation , author=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  105. [113]

    2007 , publisher=

    Meshfree Approximation Methods with MATLAB , author=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  106. [114]

    2015 , publisher=

    A Primer on Radial Basis Functions With Applications to the Geosciences , author=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  107. [115]

    Computers & Mathematics with Applications , volume=

    Stable calculation of Gaussian-based RBF-FD stencils , author=. Computers & Mathematics with Applications , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  108. [116]

    Le Borne, Sabine and Leinen, Willi , Title =. J. Sci. Comput. , ISSN =. 2023 , Language =. doi:10.1007/s10915-023-02123-7 , Keywords =

    2023 doi

  109. [117]

    Multiquadrics—A scattered data approximation scheme with applications to computational fluid-dynamics—II

    Kansa, Edward J , journal=. Multiquadrics—A scattered data approximation scheme with applications to computational fluid-dynamics—II. 1990 , publisher=

    1990

  110. [118]

    Proceedings of Chamonix , volume=

    Solving partial differential equations by collocation with radial basis functions , author=. Proceedings of Chamonix , volume=. 1996 , organization=

    1996

  111. [119]

    An efficient numerical scheme for

    Hon, YC and Mao, XZ , journal=. An efficient numerical scheme for. 1998 , publisher=

    1998

  112. [120]

    Circumventing the ill-conditioning problem with multiquadric radial basis functions:

    Kansa, EJ and Hon, YC , journal=. Circumventing the ill-conditioning problem with multiquadric radial basis functions:. 2000 , publisher=

    2000

  113. [121]

    A numerical study of some radial basis function based solution methods for elliptic

    Larsson, Elisabeth and Fornberg, Bengt , journal=. A numerical study of some radial basis function based solution methods for elliptic. 2003 , publisher=

    2003

  114. [122]

    International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids , volume=

    Integrated radial basis functions-based differential quadrature method and its performance , author=. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  115. [123]

    Fornberg, Bengt and Flyer, Natasha , journal=. Solving. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  116. [124]

    Handbook of Geomathematics , year=

    Radial basis function-generated finite differences: A mesh-free method for computational geosciences , author=. Handbook of Geomathematics , year=

  117. [125]

    finite difference mode

    On using radial basis functions in a “finite difference mode” with applications to elasticity problems , author=. Computational Mechanics , year=

  118. [126]

    and Fasshauer, Gregory E

    Mishra, Pankaj K. and Fasshauer, Gregory E. and Sen, Mrinal K. and Ling, Leevan , journal=. A stabilized radial basis-finite difference (. 2019 , volume=

    2019

  119. [127]

    Natasha. J. of Comp. Phy. , ISSN =. 2016 , Publisher =. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2016.05.026 , MSC2010 =

    2016 doi

  120. [128]

    Enhancing finite differences with radial basis functions: experiments on the

    Flyer, Natasha and Barnett, Gregory A and Wicker, Louis J , journal=. Enhancing finite differences with radial basis functions: experiments on the. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  121. [129]

    Continuum Mechanics, Applied Mathematics and Scientific Computing: Godunov's Legacy , pages=

    Ten good reasons for using polyharmonic spline reconstruction in particle fluid flow simulations , author=. Continuum Mechanics, Applied Mathematics and Scientific Computing: Godunov's Legacy , pages=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  122. [130]

    Journal of Scientific Computing , volume=

    Stabilizing radial basis function methods for conservation laws using weakly enforced boundary conditions , author=. Journal of Scientific Computing , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  123. [131]

    Computers & Mathematics with Applications , volume=

    Towards stable radial basis function methods for linear advection problems , author=. Computers & Mathematics with Applications , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  124. [132]

    SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing , volume=

    A least squares radial basis function finite difference method with improved stability properties , author=. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  125. [133]

    Sokolov, Andriy and Davydov, Oleg and Kuzmin, Dmitri and Westermann, Alexander and Turek, Stefan , Title =. J. Numer. Math. , ISSN =. 2019 , Language =. doi:10.1515/jnma-2018-0097 , Keywords =

    2019 doi

  126. [134]

    Nazarov, Murtazo , Title =. Comput. Math. Appl. , ISSN =. 2013 , Language =. doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2012.11.003 , Keywords =

    2013 doi

  127. [135]

    and Turek, S

    Kuzmin, D. and Turek, S. , Title =. J. Comput. Phys. , ISSN =. 2002 , Language =. doi:10.1006/jcph.2001.6955 , Keywords =

    2002

  128. [136]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.14548 , year=

    Stability estimates for radial basis function methods applied to time-dependent hyperbolic PDEs , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.14548 , year=

    arXiv

  129. [137]

    Tominec, Igor and Nazarov, Murtazo , Title =. J. Sci. Comput. , ISSN =. 2023 , Language =. doi:10.1007/s10915-022-02055-8 , Keywords =

    2023 doi

  130. [138]

    R. B. 2006 , Publisher =

    2006

  131. [139]

    Arefian, Sara and Mirzaei, Davoud , Title =. Comput. Math. Appl. , ISSN =. 2022 , Language =. doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2022.09.029 , Keywords =

    2022 doi

  132. [140]

    Mirzaei, Davoud , Title =. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. , ISSN =. 2021 , Language =. doi:10.1137/19M128911X , Keywords =

    2021 doi

  133. [141]

    Nakatsukasa, Yuji and S. The. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  134. [142]

    Gopal, Abinand and Trefethen, Lloyd N , journal=. New. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  135. [143]

    Gopal, Abinand and Trefethen, Lloyd N , journal=. Solving. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  136. [144]

    Baddoo, Peter J , journal=. The. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  137. [145]

    Foundations of Computational Mathematics , volume=

    On the stability and accuracy of least squares approximations , author=. Foundations of Computational Mathematics , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  138. [146]

    The SMAI Journal of Computational Mathematics , volume=

    Optimal weighted least-squares methods , author=. The SMAI Journal of Computational Mathematics , volume=

  139. [147]

    SIAM Review , volume=

    Constructing least-squares polynomial approximations , author=. SIAM Review , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  140. [148]

    Boundary and interface conditions for high-order finite-difference methods applied to the

    Nordstr. Boundary and interface conditions for high-order finite-difference methods applied to the. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 1999 , publisher=

    1999

  141. [149]

    A flux reconstruction approach to high-order schemes including discontinuous

    Huynh, Hung T , booktitle=. A flux reconstruction approach to high-order schemes including discontinuous

  142. [150]

    Journal of Scientific Computing , volume=

    A new class of high-order energy stable flux reconstruction schemes , author=. Journal of Scientific Computing , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  143. [151]

    Journal of Scientific Computing , volume=

    On the non-linear stability of flux reconstruction schemes , author=. Journal of Scientific Computing , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  144. [152]

    , Title =

    Abgrall, R. , Title =. J. Comput. Phys. , ISSN =. 2018 , Language =. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2018.06.031 , Keywords =

    2018 doi

  145. [153]

    A simple and general framework for the construction of thermodynamically compatible schemes for computational fluid and solid mechanics , FJournal =

    Abgrall, R. A simple and general framework for the construction of thermodynamically compatible schemes for computational fluid and solid mechanics , FJournal =. Appl. Math. Comput. , ISSN =. 2023 , Language =. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2022.127629 , Keywords =

    2023

  146. [154]

    Conservative scheme compatible with some other conservation laws: conservation of the local angular momentum , FJournal =

    Abgrall, R. Conservative scheme compatible with some other conservation laws: conservation of the local angular momentum , FJournal =. Comput. Fluids , ISSN =. 2022 , Language =. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2022.105663 , Keywords =

    2022

  147. [155]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume=

    A comment on the computation of non-conservative products , author=. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  148. [156]

    Computational Methods in Applied Mathematics , volume=

    Some remarks about conservation for residual distribution schemes , author=. Computational Methods in Applied Mathematics , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  149. [157]

    Reinterpretation and Extension of Entropy Correction Terms for Residual Distribution and Discontinuous

    Abgrall, R. Reinterpretation and Extension of Entropy Correction Terms for Residual Distribution and Discontinuous. Journal of Computational Physics , pages=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  150. [158]

    Communications on Applied Mathematics and Computation , volume=

    The notion of conservation for residual distribution schemes (or fluctuation splitting schemes), with some applications , author=. Communications on Applied Mathematics and Computation , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  151. [159]

    Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , volume=

    Systems of conservation laws , author=. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , volume=. 1960 , publisher=

    1960

  152. [160]

    Computers & Fluids , volume=

    On local conservation of numerical methods for conservation laws , author=. Computers & Fluids , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  153. [161]

    SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis , volume=

    Necessary and sufficient conditions for equidistant quadrature formula , author=. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis , volume=. 1970 , publisher=

    1970

  154. [162]

    Mathematics of Computation , volume=

    Discrete least squares and quadrature formulas , author=. Mathematics of Computation , volume=

  155. [163]

    Quantitative Approximation , pages=

    The approximation of multiple integrals by using interpolatory cubature formulae , author=. Quantitative Approximation , pages=. 1980 , publisher=

    1980

  156. [164]

    1980 , publisher=

    Numerical Quadrature and Cubature , author=. 1980 , publisher=

    1980

  157. [165]

    Applied Mathematics and Computation , volume=

    Gaussian quadrature for products of exponential functions , author=. Applied Mathematics and Computation , volume=. 1996 , publisher=

    1996

  158. [166]

    1998 , publisher=

    Computational Integration , author=. 1998 , publisher=

    1998

  159. [167]

    TW Reports , year=

    Cubature formulae that are exact for trigonometric polynomials , author=. TW Reports , year=

  160. [168]

    2006 , publisher=

    Approximate Calculation of Integrals , author=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  161. [169]

    2007 , publisher=

    Methods of Numerical Integration , author=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  162. [170]

    2011 , publisher=

    Quadrature Theory: The Theory of Numerical Integration on a Compact Interval , author=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  163. [171]

    Extensions of

    Ryu, Ernest K and Boyd, Stephen P , journal=. Extensions of. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  164. [172]

    Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering , volume=

    Generation and application of multivariate polynomial quadrature rules , author=. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  165. [173]

    SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing , volume=

    Numerical integration in multiple dimensions with designed quadrature , author=. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  166. [174]

    Stable discretisations of high-order discontinuous

    Glaubitz, Jan and. Stable discretisations of high-order discontinuous. Applied Numerical Mathematics , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  167. [175]

    Computing , volume=

    Numerical cubature on scattered data by radial basis functions , author=. Computing , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  168. [176]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume=

    Numerical quadrature over smooth surfaces with boundaries , author=. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  169. [177]

    2021 , publisher=

    Sommariva, A and Vianello, M , journal=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  170. [178]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.06375 , year=

    Towards stability of radial basis function based cubature formulas , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.06375 , year=

    arXiv

  171. [179]

    Nassajian Mojarrad, Fatemeh and Han Veiga, Maria and Hesthaven, Jan S. and. A new variable shape parameter strategy for. Comput. Math. Appl. , ISSN =. 2023 , Language =. doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2023.05.005 , Keywords =

    2023 doi

  172. [180]

    Han Veiga, Maria and. J. Sci. Comput. , ISSN =. 2021 , Language =. doi:10.1007/s10915-020-01397-5 , Keywords =

    2021 doi

  173. [181]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume=

    The continuous Galerkin method is locally conservative , author=. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 2000 , publisher=

    2000

  174. [182]

    Annual review of fluid mechanics , volume=

    Discrete conservation properties of unstructured mesh schemes , author=. Annual review of fluid mechanics , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  175. [183]

    Generalized

    Ma, J and Rokhlin, V and Wandzura, Stephen , journal=. Generalized. 1996 , publisher=

    1996

  176. [184]

    SIAM Journal on Optimization , volume=

    Nonlinear optimization, quadrature, and interpolation , author=. SIAM Journal on Optimization , volume=. 1999 , publisher=

    1999

  177. [185]

    Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics , volume=

    Stable high-order quadrature rules with equidistant points , author=. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  178. [186]

    On generalized

    Huybrechs, Daan and Cools, Ronald , journal=. On generalized. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  179. [187]

    A nonlinear optimization procedure for generalized

    Bremer, James and Gimbutas, Zydrunas and Rokhlin, Vladimir , journal=. A nonlinear optimization procedure for generalized. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  180. [188]

    SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis , volume=

    Stable high order quadrature rules for scattered data and general weight functions , author=. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  181. [189]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume=

    Stable high-order cubature formulas for experimental data , author=. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  182. [190]

    IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis , volume=

    Construction and application of provable positive and exact cubature formulas , author=. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  183. [191]

    On the computation of

    Huybrechs, Daan , journal=. On the computation of. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  184. [192]

    SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing , volume=

    Total-variation-diminishing time discretizations , author=. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing , volume=. 1988 , publisher=

    1988

  185. [193]

    Total variation diminishing

    Gottlieb, Sigal and Shu, Chi-Wang , journal=. Total variation diminishing. 1998 , publisher=

    1998

  186. [194]

    From Semidiscrete to Fully Discrete: Stability of

    Levy, Doron and Tadmor, Eitan , journal=. From Semidiscrete to Fully Discrete: Stability of. 1998 , publisher=

    1998

  187. [195]

    SIAM Review , volume=

    Strong stability-preserving high-order time discretization methods , author=. SIAM Review , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

    2001

  188. [196]

    Highly efficient strong stability-preserving

    Ketcheson, David I , journal=. Highly efficient strong stability-preserving. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  189. [197]

    Strong stability preserving

    Gottlieb, Sigal and Ketcheson, David I and Shu, Chi-Wang , year=. Strong stability preserving

  190. [198]

    Toro, E. F. and Spruce, M. and Speares, W. , year =. Restoration of the Contact Surface in the. Shock Waves , volume =

  191. [199]

    Boscheri, Walter and Dumbser, Michael and Gaburro, Elena , Title =. Commun. Comput. Phys. , ISSN =. 2022 , Language =. doi:10.4208/cicp.OA-2021-0235 , Keywords =

    2022 doi

  192. [200]

    Gaburro, Elena and Boscheri, Walter and Chiocchetti, Simone and Klingenberg, Christian and Springel, Volker and Dumbser, Michael , Title =. J. Comput. Phys. , ISSN =. 2020 , Language =. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2019.109167 , Keywords =

    2020

  193. [201]

    2008 , Publisher =

    de Berg, Mark and Cheong, Otfried and van Kreveld, Marc and Overmars, Mark , Title =. 2008 , Publisher =

    2008

  194. [202]

    1966 , publisher=

    Tchebycheff Systems: With Applications in Analysis and Statistics , author=. 1966 , publisher=

    1966

  195. [203]

    1972 , publisher=

    Handbook of Mathematical Functions With Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables , author=. 1972 , publisher=

    1972

  196. [204]

    SIAM Review , volume=

    _2 -Solutions to Underdetermined Linear Systems , author=. SIAM Review , volume=. 1976 , publisher=

    1976

  197. [205]

    1977 , publisher=

    Introductory Combinatorics , author=. 1977 , publisher=

    1977

  198. [206]

    The numerical viscosity of entropy stable schemes for systems of conservation laws

    Tadmor, Eitan , journal=. The numerical viscosity of entropy stable schemes for systems of conservation laws

  199. [207]

    Mathematics of computation , volume=

    Why nonconservative schemes converge to wrong solutions: error analysis , author=. Mathematics of computation , volume=

  200. [208]

    1997 , publisher=

    Numerical Linear Algebra , author=. 1997 , publisher=

    1997

  201. [209]

    1997 , publisher=

    Numerical Analysis , author=. 1997 , publisher=

    1997

  202. [210]

    2002 , publisher=

    Bessel Functions and their Applications , author=. 2002 , publisher=

    2002

  203. [211]

    2003 , publisher=

    Generalized Inverses: Theory and Applications , author=. 2003 , publisher=

    2003

  204. [212]

    2012 , publisher=

    Matrix Computations , author=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  205. [213]

    2012 , publisher=

    Matrix Analysis , author=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  206. [214]

    2019 , publisher=

    Linear Algebra and Learning From Data , author=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  207. [215]

    2020 , publisher=

    Shock Capturing and High-Order Methods for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws , author=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  208. [216]

    2023 , publisher=

    Approximation and Stability Properties of Numerical Methods for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws , author=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  209. [217]

    Generalized

    Yarvin, Norman and Rokhlin, Vladimir , journal=. Generalized. 1998 , publisher=

    1998

  210. [218]

    Adaptive numerical simulations with

    Ranocha, Hendrik and Schlottke-Lakemper, Michael and Winters, Andrew Ross and Faulhaber, Erik and Chan, Jesse and Gassner, Gregor , journal=. Adaptive numerical simulations with. 2022 , doi=. 2108.06476 , eprinttype=

    2022 arXiv

  211. [219]

    A purely hyperbolic discontinuous

    Schlottke-Lakemper, Michael and Winters, Andrew R and Ranocha, Hendrik and Gassner, Gregor J , journal=. A purely hyperbolic discontinuous. 2021 , month=. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110467 , eprint=

    2021

  212. [220]

    and Kennedy, Christopher A

    Carpenter, Mark H. and Kennedy, Christopher A. , year = 1994, month = jun, number =. Fourth-Order

    1994

  213. [221]

    Journal of Open Research Software , volume=

    Differentialequations.jl--a performant and feature-rich ecosystem for solving differential equations in julia , author=. Journal of Open Research Software , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.