REVIEW 3 cited by
The Size-Mass relation at Rest-Frame $1.5\mu$m from JWST/NIRCam in the COSMOS-WEB and PRIMER-COSMOS fields
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We present the galaxy stellar mass - size relation in the rest-frame near-IR ($1.5~\mu{\text{m}}$) and its evolution with redshift up to $z=2.5$. S\'ersic profiles are measured for $\sim$ $26\,000$ galaxies with stellar masses $M_\star > 10^9~{\text{M}}_\odot$ from JWST/NIRCam F277W and F444W imaging provided by the COSMOS-WEB and PRIMER surveys, using coordinates, redshifts, colors and stellar mass estimates from the COSMOS2020 catalog. The new rest-frame near-IR effective radii are generally smaller than previously measured rest-frame optical sizes, on average by 0.14~dex, with no significant dependence on redshift. For quiescent galaxies this size offset does not depend on stellar mass, but for star-forming galaxies the offset increases from -0.1~dex at $M_\star = 10^{9.5}~{\text{M}}_\odot$ to -0.25~dex at $M_\star > 10^{11}~{\text{M}}_\odot$. That is, we find that the near-IR stellar mass - size relation for star-forming galaxies is flatter in the rest-frame near-IR than in the rest-frame optical at all redshifts $0.5<z<2.5$. The general pace of size evolution is the same in the near-IR as previously demonstrated in the optical, with slower evolution ($R_{\text{e}} \propto (1+z)^{-0.7}$) for $L^*$~star-forming galaxies and faster evolution ($R_{\text{e}} \propto (1+z)^{-1.3}$) for $L^*$~quiescent galaxies. Massive ($M_\star>10^{11}~{\text{M}}_\odot$) star-forming galaxies evolve in size almost as fast as quiescent galaxies. Low-mass ($M_\star<10^{10}~{\text{M}}_\odot$)~quiescent galaxies evolve as slow as star-forming galaxies. Our main conclusion is that the size evolution narrative as it has emerged over the past two decades does not radically change when accessing with JWST the rest-frame near-IR, a better proxy of the underlying stellar mass distribution.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Mass--size evolution and the emerging passive--density relation revealed by JWST/NIRCam in the Spiderweb protocluster
In the Spiderweb protocluster, passive fraction rises with local density to ~60% while passive mass–size intercepts sit between field and cluster values, indicating advanced quenching but ongoing size growth.
-
Evolution of the S\'ersic Index up to z=2.5 from JWST and HST
The median Sérsic index changes little with redshift except for the most massive galaxies, with near-infrared structure depending strongly on star-formation activity but not stellar mass at z>1.
-
The Impact of Galaxy-halo Size Relations on Galaxy Clustering Signals
The simple linear galaxy size model, combined with abundance matching on peak halo mass, secretly encodes halo formation time into galaxy sizes, so the observed size-split clustering pattern reflects assembly bias rat...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.