The microscopic derivation and well-posedness of the stochastic Keller-Segel equation

Hui Huang; Jinniao Qiu

The microscopic derivation and well-posedness of the stochastic Keller-Segel equation

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Under a smallness condition on the initial density and a divergence-free common noise, the stochastic Keller–Segel equation admits a unique nonnegative solution, and the empirical measures of the regularized particle system converge to it…

desk verdict Genuinely new stochastic Keller-Segel SPDE with common noise, proved well-posed under a disclosed divergence-free condition and connected to a mean-field limit; a solid, honest paper worth a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03375 v3 pith:FTVFYQWR submitted 2019-08-09 math.AP math.PR

Hui Huang , Jinniao Qiu This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.APmath.PR MSC 60H1535Q9235K5560K35

keywords chemotaxisstochasticKeller-Segelequationcommonnoisemean-fieldlimitpropagationofchaosBesselpotentialpartialdifferentialwell-posedness

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes a stochastic Keller–Segel equation in dimensions $d=2,3$ that describes chemotaxis under a common environmental noise, and it tries to show that this equation is well-posed and is the true mean-field limit of a microscopic particle system. In the classical deterministic Keller–Segel equation, only independent idiosyncratic noises appear, and they average out; here the particles also share a common Wiener noise, so the limiting density remains random and satisfies an SPDE. The main results state that when the $L^4$-norm of the initial density is small and the common-noise coefficient is divergence-free, the SPDE has a unique nonnegative solution, and the empirical measure of the mollified interacting particle system converges weakly to that solution as the number of particles $N$ tends to infinity and the regularization parameter $\varepsilon$ tends to zero. A sympathetic reader would care because real bacterial colonies experience shared fluctuating environments, and this gives a rigorous macroscopic equation for that setting rather than treating noise as merely particle-by-particle.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the $L^4$ a priori estimate for the SPDE, combined with the Bessel potential's smoothing property $\|\nabla G*\rho\|_\infty \le S_d\|\rho\|_4$. The divergence-free condition on $\sigma$ (Assumption 1(iii)) makes the stochastic integral in Itô's formula for $\|\rho_t\|_4^4$ vanish identically, reducing the estimate to a deterministic differential inequality; Grönwall's inequality then keeps $\rho$ in $S^\infty_{\mathcal F^W}([0,T];L^4)$. This boundedness lets the Keller–Segel nonlinearity be absorbed into a small parameter $\kappa$, and the solution map on the ball $B$ is shown to be a contraction. For the mean-field step, a duality analysis with a backward SPDE — whose solution has a probabilistic representation as a conditional expectation — identifies the SPDE solution as the conditional density of the nonlinear SDE, and mollifier estimates control the difference between $\nabla G_\varepsilon$ and $\nabla G$.

What would settle it

Take a common-noise coefficient $\sigma$ whose divergence is not zero and an initial density satisfying the theorem's smallness condition, then test whether the Itô formula for $\|\rho_t\|_4^4$ retains a nonzero martingale term; if that term is large enough to violate the Grönwall bound used in the contraction argument, or if simulations of the compressible-noise particle system show the empirical measure drifting away from (1.3), then the stated hypotheses are not sufficient.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the stochastic aggregation-diffusion equation of Keller–Segel type, with chemical concentration $c_t=(I-\Delta)^{-1}\rho_t$ where $G$ is the Bessel potential, is globally well-posed in the spaces $M$ (Theorem 3.2) or $M_1$ (Theorem 3.4) provided Assumption 1 holds and $\|\rho_0\|_4$ is small enough. The same solution is shown to be the conditional density of the McKean-Vlasov SDE (1.7), so the stochastic particle system is consistent with the SPDE at the level of law. Finally, the empirical measure of the regularized interacting particle system (1.5) converges weakly to that solution with an explicit rate in $N$ and $\varepsilon$ (Theorem 5.1 and Corollary 5.2). In plain terms: the paper claims that chemoattracting particles buffeted by a shared environmental noise have a unique macroscopic density, and that this density is exactly what the particle system produces in the mean-field limit.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the common-noise coefficient $\sigma$ being divergence-free, meaning the environmental fluctuations are incompressible; without that, the central $L^4$ estimate acquires a stochastic term the proof cannot control, as the paper's Remark 3.1 concedes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the theorem is correct, chemotaxis models with common environmental noise have a unique macroscopic density, so questions about aggregation and blow-up can be posed for the SPDE rather than only for the particle system.
The conditional-density result gives a well-posed McKean-Vlasov SDE whose law under the common noise is the SPDE solution, closing the circle between microscopic and macroscopic descriptions.
For a test function $\varphi$, the empirical measure error is bounded by $C\big((\delta\ln N)^{(2d-2)/d}N^{-(1-C\delta)} + N^{-1} + (\delta\ln N)^{-2/d}\big)$, so the convergence is quantified and the regularization $\varepsilon$ must vanish logarithmically slowly relative to $N$.
The non-mollified singular particle system is known to have strictly positive collision probability, so the regularization in (1.5) is not an artifact: it is necessary for a global strong solution, and the limit $\varepsilon\to 0$ is taken after $N\to\infty$.
Under the same smallness condition, the solution is nonnegative and conserves mass ($\|\rho_t\|_1=1$), matching the probabilistic interpretation of a density.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural test of the paper's scope is whether the divergence-free condition can be relaxed: any coefficient structure that makes the stochastic integral in the $L^4$ estimate vanish or remain controllable would likely allow the same contraction argument to run, and the paper's Remark 3.1 suggests the authors view this as the main technical gap rather than a physical necessity.
The smallness condition is phrased in $L^4$, not in the mass $m_0\chi$ familiar from deterministic Keller–Segel; one might conjecture a stochastic critical-mass threshold, but the paper does not address it.
The explicit convergence rate suggests a practical random-particle blob method for stochastic chemotaxis; a numerical check of whether the $\delta\ln N$ window is sharp could be done with standard particle simulations.
The forward–backward SPDE duality used here is not tied to the Bessel kernel specifically; it may extend to other singular nonlocal SPDEs with common noise, such as stochastic aggregation equations with interaction kernels satisfying similar Sobolev bounds.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This is a genuinely new stochastic Keller-Segel model: common noise plus Bessel potential, neither in the literature as far as I can tell. The paper proves unique well-posedness in an L4-small-data regime, identifies the conditional density of a McKean-Vlasov SDE as the solution, and establishes a mean-field limit from a regularized particle system. The package is coherent and the main estimates are detailed.

The key trick is clean: under the divergence-free assumption on the common-noise coefficient, the stochastic integral in the L4 estimate vanishes, giving a deterministic Gronwall bound and a contraction. That assumption is load-bearing, as the paper admits. If the environmental noise is incompressible, fine; if not, the proof collapses. That is the biggest soft spot, but it is disclosed in Remark 3.1 and used exactly as stated. The smallness condition on the initial L4 norm is also strong and rules out the interesting near-critical chemotaxis regime, but that is a scope limitation, not a flaw in the proof.

The duality argument connecting the forward SPDE with a backward SPDE to show that the conditional density solves the equation is well done. The mean-field estimates are carefully laid out; I traced the L4 estimates, the contraction, the duality, and the epsilon and N error bounds, and they close. The final rate with epsilon^{-d} = delta ln N and C*delta < 1 is fine. I did not independently verify every hypothesis of Krylov's Lp theory invoked for the linear SPDE, but the lower-order terms look controlled and I saw no visible gap.

Self-citations are used as tools, not as the target result, so no circularity. The paper is honest about its limitations. This is a serious contribution to stochastic aggregation equations and common-noise propagation of chaos, though not a breakthrough outside that subfield. I would send it to a serious referee without desk rejection, and I expect it to be accepted after the usual checks. Worth a close reading if you work on SPDEs or mean-field limits.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a stochastic Keller-Segel equation with common environmental noise, proves well-posedness for small L4 initial data under a divergence-free condition on the common-noise coefficient, establishes the well-posedness of a McKean-Vlasov SDE whose conditional density solves the SPDE, and proves a quantitative mean-field limit for a regularized interacting particle system. The main results are Theorems 3.2, 3.4, 4.1, 5.1 and Corollary 5.2. The proofs combine Krylov's Lp theory of SPDEs, a contraction mapping in S∞_{FW}(L4), a forward-backward SPDE duality argument, and Gronwall-type estimates with explicit rates in N and ε.

Significance. If the results are correct, this is the first rigorous well-posedness and mean-field limit result for a Keller-Segel type SPDE with a genuine common noise and a singular (Bessel) interaction. The paper is transparent about the load-bearing divergence-free condition and the smallness assumption on the L4 norm of the initial data. Its strengths include the explicit smallness thresholds, the duality-based identification of the conditional density, and quantitative convergence rates in the mean-field limit. The technical arguments are laid out in detail, and I found no circularity or internal inconsistency; the main external dependencies are clearly cited.

minor comments (5)

[Section 3, first paragraph] The sentence 'This section is devoted to the global existence and uniqueness of the solution to nonlinear SPDE (1.7)' should refer to SPDE (1.3); the displayed equation numbers in the text sometimes lag the actual numbering.
[Abstract and Introduction] The phrase 'Unlike the classical deterministic KS system, which only allows for idiosyncratic noises' is inaccurate because the deterministic KS system has no noise; it should refer to classical stochastic KS models with only idiosyncratic noise.
[Equation (3.6) and surrounding text] The verification of the hypotheses of Krylov's Lp theory for the linear SPDE is compressed into 'standard computations.' Since this theory is used repeatedly (Theorems 3.2, 3.4, and Lemma 4.1), please add a short paragraph listing the checked conditions, particularly the boundedness of the first-order coefficient b_t = χ∇G*ξ_t and the treatment of the lower-order terms.
[Equation (5.5)] The bound ||(∇Gε−∇G)*ρ^ε_s||∞ ≤ C ε ||ρ^ε_s||_{W^{1,4}} is asserted without proof; a sentence explaining the Sobolev embedding and the representation of ∇^2G*ρ as a Riesz potential would help the reader.
[General] There are numerous typos and spacing errors throughout the text (e.g., 'DERIV A TION', 'EQUA TION', 'Keller-Se gel' in the header); a careful proofreading is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the SPDE well-posedness and mean-field limit are proved directly from explicit assumptions, with self-citations used only as auxiliary technical tools.

full rationale

The central claims (Theorems 3.2, 3.4, 4.1, 5.1, and Corollary 5.2) are obtained by forward proofs rather than by presupposing the target results. Theorem 3.2 constructs a contraction map on the ball B via the linearized SPDE (3.5); the smallness condition on ||rho_0||_4 arises from explicit Gronwall and contraction estimates (3.12), (3.13), and (3.16), not from assuming existence. Assumption 1(iii), the divergence-free condition on sigma, is used exactly where stated to kill the stochastic integral in the L4 estimate (3.8)-(3.9); this limitation is disclosed in Remark 3.1, not hidden. Theorem 4.1 identifies the conditional density of the McKean-Vlasov SDE with rho using a forward-backward SPDE duality argument; backward SPDE solvability is imported from [19,41] as an external tool, and the identification is verified by Ito's formula rather than taken as an input. Theorem 5.1 and Corollary 5.2 compare the regularized particle system with the mean-field dynamics and estimate the error via Gronwall's inequality; the rates (5.10), (5.15), and (5.21) are derived, not fitted. The paper's self-citations, such as [29] for the mollifier estimate used in (2.3) and [19] for linear backward SPDE theory, are auxiliary estimates or theorems whose conclusions are not the paper's target result; they are not used to force the existence, uniqueness, or convergence conclusions. No prediction or derived quantity is identical by construction to an input parameter, and no fitted value is renamed as a prediction. Therefore the derivation chain is self-contained modulo standard external PDE/SPDE theory and explicit standing assumptions.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

There are no fitted parameters: κ and ℓ are smallness thresholds chosen inside the proof, not numbers fitted to data. The only new modeling ingredients are the common noise and the Bessel-potential interaction, both explicit assumptions rather than hidden entities. The load-bearing assumptions are all listed in Assumption 1 and in the external SPDE theorems invoked.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Assumption 1(i): uniform ellipticity of νν^T, meaning the idiosyncratic noise coefficient is non-degenerate.
Used to ensure superparabolicity of SPDE (1.3) and coercive L4 estimates. It is imposed on the noise coefficients, not derived.
domain assumption Assumption 1(ii): σ and ν are C^m-smooth and bounded in C^m norm.
Required by Krylov's Lp theory and by the coefficient estimates throughout Sections 3 to 5. This restricts the admissible noise coefficients.
domain assumption Assumption 1(iii): σ is divergence-free.
Cancels the stochastic integral in the L4 estimate (3.8) and is essential for the proof of ρ in S∞_FW L4. The paper flags this as technical in Remark 3.1.
standard math The Bessel potential G = (I - Δ)^(-1) admits the decomposition G = Φ + Ψ with the bounds in (2.3).
Used to bound ∇Gε and the difference ∇Gε - ∇G in the mean-field limit. This is standard Fourier analysis.
standard math Krylov's Lp theory of SPDEs and the L2 theory of backward SPDEs (references [36], [19], [41]).
Invoked as external theorems to obtain existence, uniqueness, and regularity for linear SPDEs and backward SPDEs.
standard math Sobolev embeddings and Itô's formula for Lp norms (references [8], [39], [37]).
Provide W^{2,4} to W^{1,∞} embeddings and the Lp-norm evolution used in a priori estimates.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The microscopic derivation and well-posedness of the stochastic Keller-Segel equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FTVFYQWR

@misc{pith2026190803375,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The microscopic derivation and well-posedness of the stochastic Keller-Segel equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FTVFYQWR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03375}
}

abstract

In this paper, we propose and study a stochastic aggregation-diffusion equation of the Keller-Segel (KS) type for modeling the chemotaxis in dimensions $d=2,3$. Unlike the classical deterministic KS system, which only allows for idiosyncratic noises, the stochastic KS equation is derived from an interacting particle system subject to both idiosyncratic and common noises. Both the unique existence of solutions to the stochastic KS equation and the mean-field limit result are addressed.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

[1]

11, 2041–2069

Nicola Bellomo, Abdel Bellouquid, and Nadia Chouhad, From a multiscale derivation of nonlinear cross-diﬀusion m odels to Keller-Segel models in a Navier-Stokes ﬂuid , Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences 26 (2016), no. 11, 2041–2069

work page 2016
[2]

Alain Bensoussan, Jens Frehse, and Phillip Yam, Mean ﬁeld games and mean ﬁeld type control theory , 2013

work page 2013
[3]

Piotr Biler, Mathematical challenges in the theory of chemotaxis , Annales mathematicae silesianae, 2018, pp. 43–63

work page 2018
[4]

2, 247–262

Piotr Biler and Grzegorz Karch, Blowup of solutions to generalized Keller-Segel model , Journal of Evolution equations 10 (2010), no. 2, 247–262

work page 2010
[5]

Carrillo, and Nader Masmoudi, Inﬁnite time aggregation for the critical Patlak-Keller-S egel model in R2, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 61 (2008), no

Adrien Blanchet, Jos´ e A. Carrillo, and Nader Masmoudi, Inﬁnite time aggregation for the critical Patlak-Keller-S egel model in R2, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 61 (2008), no. 10, 1449–1481

work page 2008
[6]

44, 1–33

Adrien Blanchet, Jean Dolbeault, and Beno ˆ ıt Perthame, Two-dimensional keller-segel model: Optimal critical mas s and qualitative properties of the solutions , Electronic Journal of Diﬀerential Equations (EJDE)[elec tronic only] 2006 (2006), no. 44, 1–33

work page 2006
[7]

9, 708–720

Didier Bresch, Pierre-Emmanuel Jabin, and Zhenfu W ang, On mean-ﬁeld limits and quantitative estimates with a large class of singular kernels: Application to the Patlak-Kelle r-Segel model, Comptes Rendus Mathematique 357 (2019), no. 9, 708–720

work page 2019
[8]

Haim Brezis, Functional analysis, Sobolev spaces and partial diﬀerenti al equations , Springer Science & Business Media, 2010

work page 2010

Show all 41 references

[9]

1, 107–142

Zdzislaw Brzezniak, Franco Flandoli, and Mario Maurell i, Existence and uniqueness for stochastic 2D Euler ﬂows with bounded vorticity , Archive for Rational Mechanics & Analysis 221 (2016), no. 1, 107–142

2016
[10]

04, 791–823

Diletta Burini and Nadia Chouhad, A multiscale view of nonlinear diﬀusion in biology: From cel ls to tissues , Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences 29 (2019), no. 04, 791–823

2019
[11]

Ren´ e Carmona and Fran¸ cois Delarue,Probabilistic theory of mean ﬁeld games with applications i -ii, Springer, 2018

2018
[12]

6, 3740–3803

Ren´ e Carmona, Francois Delarue, and Daniel Lacker, Mean ﬁeld games with common noise , Annals of Probability 44 (2016), no. 6, 3740–3803

2016
[13]

Jos´ e A. Carrillo, Young-Pil Choi, and Maxime Hauray, The derivation of swarming models: mean-ﬁeld limit and Wass er- stein distances , Collective dynamics from bacteria to crowds 553 (2014), 1–46

2014
[14]

Patrick Cattiaux and Laure P´ ed` eches, The 2-d stochastic Keller-Segel particle model: existence and uniqueness , arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.08026 (2016)

2016 arXiv
[15]

3, 573–592

Young-Pil Choi and Samir Salem, Cucker-Smale ﬂocking particles with multiplicative noise s: Stochastic mean-ﬁeld limit and phase transition , Kinetic & Related Models 12 (2019), no. 3, 573–592. 28 HUI HUANG AND JINNIAO QIU

2019
[16]

3, 1407–1442

Michele Coghi and Franco Flandoli, Propagation of chaos for interacting particles subject to e nvironmental noise , The Annals of Applied Probability 26 (2016), no. 3, 1407–1442

2016
[17]

Lucilla Corrias, Beno ˆ ıt Perthame, and Hatem Zaag, Global solutions of some chemotaxis and angiogenesis syste ms in high space dimensions, Milan Journal of Mathematics 72 (2004), no. 1, 1–28

2004
[18]

9, 611–616

Jean Dolbeault and Beno ˆ ıt Perthame, Optimal critical mass in the two dimensional Keller-Segel m odel in R2, Comptes Rendus Mathematique 339 (2004), no. 9, 611–616

2004
[19]

2, 175–219

Kai Du, Jinniao Qiu, and Shanjian Tang, Lp theory for super-parabolic backward stochastic partial di ﬀerential equations in the whole space , Applied Mathematics & Optimization 65 (2011), no. 2, 175–219

2011
[20]

12, 2909

Carlos Escudero, The fractional Keller–Segel model , Nonlinearity 19 (2006), no. 12, 2909

2006
[21]

Fetecau, Hui Huang, and W eiran Sun, Propagation of chaos for the Keller-Segel equation over bou nded domains, Journal of Diﬀerential Equations 266 (2019), no

Razvan C. Fetecau, Hui Huang, and W eiran Sun, Propagation of chaos for the Keller-Segel equation over bou nded domains, Journal of Diﬀerential Equations 266 (2019), no. 4, 2142–2174

2019
[22]

5, 2807–2861

Nicolas Fournier and Benjamin Jourdain, Stochastic particle approximation of the Keller-Segel equ ation and two- dimensional generalization of Bessel processes , The Annals of Applied Probability 27 (2017), no. 5, 2807–2861

2017
[23]

6, 940–960

Jan Haˇ skovec and Christian Schmeiser, Convergence of a stochastic particle approximation for mea sure solutions of the 2d Keller-Segel system , Communications in Partial Diﬀerential Equations 36 (2011), no. 6, 940–960

2011
[24]

10, 437–479

David Hilbert, Mathematical problems, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 8 (1902), no. 10, 437–479

1902
[25]

Painter, A user’s guide to PDE models for chemotaxis , Journal of mathematical biology 58 (2009), no

Thomas Hillen and Kevin J. Painter, A user’s guide to PDE models for chemotaxis , Journal of mathematical biology 58 (2009), no. 1-2, 183

2009
[26]

Dirk Horstmann, From 1970 until present: the Keller-Segel model in chemotax is and its consequences (2003)

2003
[27]

4, 715–748

Hui Huang and Jian-Guo Liu, Well-posedness for the Keller-Segel equation with fractio nal Laplacian and the theory of propagation of chaos , Kinetic & Related Models 9 (2016), no. 4, 715–748

2016
[28]

7, 1821–1842

Hui Huang and Jian-Guo Liu, Discrete-in-time random particle blob method for the Kelle r-Segel equation and convergence analysis, Communication in Mathematical Sciences 15 (2017), no. 7, 1821–1842

2017
[29]

308, 2719–2744

Hui Huang and Jian-Guo Liu, Error estimate of a random particle blob method for the Kelle r-Segel equation, Mathematics of Computation 86 (2017), no. 308, 2719–2744

2017
[30]

01, 1–29

Hui Huang, Jian-Guo Liu, and Jianfeng Lu, Learning interacting particle systems: Diﬀusion paramete r estimation for aggregation equations, Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences 29 (2019), no. 01, 1–29

2019
[31]

Pierre-Emmanuel Jabin and Zhenfu W ang, Mean ﬁeld limit for stochastic particle systems , Active particles, volume 1, 2017, pp. 379–402

2017
[32]

2, 819–824

Willi J¨ ager and Stephan Luckhaus, On explosions of solutions to a system of partial diﬀerentia l equations modelling chemotaxis, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 329 (1992), no. 2, 819–824

1992
[33]

1, 118–152

Michael R¨ ockner Jiagang Ren and Fengyu W ang, Stochastic generalized porous media and fast diﬀusion equa tions, Journal of Diﬀerential Equations 238 (2007), no. 1, 118–152

2007
[34]

Shreve, Brownian motion and stochastic calculus , Springer Science & Business Media, 1998

Ioannis Karatzas and Steven E. Shreve, Brownian motion and stochastic calculus , Springer Science & Business Media, 1998

1998
[35]

Keller and Lee A

Evelyn F. Keller and Lee A. Segel, Initiation of slime mold aggregation viewed as an instabili ty, Journal of Theoretical Biology 26 (1970), no. 3, 399–415

1970
[36]

Krylov, An analytic approach to SPDEs , Vol

Nicolai V. Krylov, An analytic approach to SPDEs , Vol. 64, Stochastic partial diﬀerential equations: six pe rspectives, AMS Mathmatical Surveys and Monographs, 1999. STOCHASTIC KELLER-SEGEL EQUATION 29

1999
[37]

Krylov, Itˆ o’s formula for theLp-norm of stochastic W 1 p -valued processes, Probability theory and related ﬁelds 147 (2010), no

Nicolai V. Krylov, Itˆ o’s formula for theLp-norm of stochastic W 1 p -valued processes, Probability theory and related ﬁelds 147 (2010), no. 3, 583–605

2010
[38]

Beno ˆ ıt Perthame,Transport equations in biology , Springer Science & Business Media, 2006

2006
[39]

Hans Triebel, Theory of function spaces , Birkh¨ auser Basel, 1983

1983
[40]

1, 64–95

Zhou Yang and Shanjian Tang, Dynkin game of stochastic diﬀerential equations with rando m coeﬃcients, and associated backward stochastic partial diﬀerential variational ineq uality, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 51 (2013), no. 1, 64–95

2013
[41]

Department of Mathematics, Technische Universit ¨at M ¨unchen, Boltzmannstr

Xunyu Zhou, A duality analysis on stochastic partial diﬀerential equat ions, Journal of Functional Analysis 103 (1992), 275–293. Department of Mathematics, Technische Universit ¨at M ¨unchen, Boltzmannstr. 3, 85748 Garching, Germany E-mail address : hui.huang@tum.de Department...

1992

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

11, 2041–2069

Nicola Bellomo, Abdel Bellouquid, and Nadia Chouhad, From a multiscale derivation of nonlinear cross-diﬀusion m odels to Keller-Segel models in a Navier-Stokes ﬂuid , Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences 26 (2016), no. 11, 2041–2069

work page 2016

[2] [2]

Alain Bensoussan, Jens Frehse, and Phillip Yam, Mean ﬁeld games and mean ﬁeld type control theory , 2013

work page 2013

[3] [3]

Piotr Biler, Mathematical challenges in the theory of chemotaxis , Annales mathematicae silesianae, 2018, pp. 43–63

work page 2018

[4] [4]

2, 247–262

Piotr Biler and Grzegorz Karch, Blowup of solutions to generalized Keller-Segel model , Journal of Evolution equations 10 (2010), no. 2, 247–262

work page 2010

[5] [5]

Carrillo, and Nader Masmoudi, Inﬁnite time aggregation for the critical Patlak-Keller-S egel model in R2, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 61 (2008), no

Adrien Blanchet, Jos´ e A. Carrillo, and Nader Masmoudi, Inﬁnite time aggregation for the critical Patlak-Keller-S egel model in R2, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 61 (2008), no. 10, 1449–1481

work page 2008

[6] [6]

44, 1–33

Adrien Blanchet, Jean Dolbeault, and Beno ˆ ıt Perthame, Two-dimensional keller-segel model: Optimal critical mas s and qualitative properties of the solutions , Electronic Journal of Diﬀerential Equations (EJDE)[elec tronic only] 2006 (2006), no. 44, 1–33

work page 2006

[7] [7]

9, 708–720

Didier Bresch, Pierre-Emmanuel Jabin, and Zhenfu W ang, On mean-ﬁeld limits and quantitative estimates with a large class of singular kernels: Application to the Patlak-Kelle r-Segel model, Comptes Rendus Mathematique 357 (2019), no. 9, 708–720

work page 2019

[8] [8]

Haim Brezis, Functional analysis, Sobolev spaces and partial diﬀerenti al equations , Springer Science & Business Media, 2010

work page 2010