Compressible Turbulence as a Source of Particle Beams and Ion Bernstein Waves in Collisionless Plasmas

Chuanpeng Hou; Huirong Yan; Siqi Zhao

arxiv: 2601.20842 · v2 · pith:FUVR7VMUnew · submitted 2026-01-28 · ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph

Compressible Turbulence as a Source of Particle Beams and Ion Bernstein Waves in Collisionless Plasmas

Chuanpeng Hou , Huirong Yan , Siqi Zhao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 06:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph

keywords compressible turbulencetransit-time dampingproton beamsion Bernstein wavescollisionless plasmassolar windparticle-in-cell simulationskinetic dissipation

0 comments

The pith

Compressive turbulence damps fluctuations via transit-time damping to produce proton beams and excites ion Bernstein waves at sub-ion scales.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates the generation of proton beams and ion Bernstein waves in collisionless plasmas through high-resolution particle-in-cell simulations of compressible turbulence. At magnetohydrodynamic scales, compressive fluctuations undergo transit-time damping that creates suprathermal electrons and proton beams. At sub-ion scales, quasi-perpendicular fast modes drive multiple branches of ion Bernstein waves that match plasma dispersion predictions. This mechanism remains efficient under solar wind conditions and accounts for observed super-Alfvénic proton beams while showing how compressive fluctuations enable cross-scale energy transfer and kinetic dissipation.

Core claim

In high-resolution particle-in-cell simulations of compressible turbulence, compressive fluctuations are damped via transit-time damping at magnetohydrodynamic scales, naturally producing suprathermal electrons and proton beams. At sub-ion scales, quasi-perpendicular fast modes excite multiple branches of ion Bernstein waves whose properties agree with predictions from the plasma dispersion relation solver. Under solar wind conditions, transit-time damping remains efficient and provides a natural explanation for the super-Alfvénic proton beams measured in situ.

What carries the argument

Transit-time damping of compressive fluctuations at MHD scales, which produces suprathermal electrons and proton beams, together with excitation of ion Bernstein waves by quasi-perpendicular fast modes at sub-ion scales.

Load-bearing premise

The particle-in-cell simulations accurately capture transit-time damping and wave excitation without numerical artifacts or insufficient resolution altering the beam formation or wave properties.

What would settle it

In-situ solar wind data showing no link between compressive fluctuation amplitude and super-Alfvénic proton beam speeds, or observed wave spectra lacking the predicted ion Bernstein branches, would falsify the proposed generation mechanism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.20842 by Chuanpeng Hou, Huirong Yan, Siqi Zhao.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Dispersion relations at sub-ion scales during the inter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Particle velocity distributions corresponding to the spatial region ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Unraveling the origin of proton beams and ion Bernstein waves is important to understanding kinetic dissipation in the solar wind. Here we focus on their generation mechanisms, rather than their well-studied roles in instabilities and particle heating. We investigate their formation in collisionless plasmas using high-resolution particle-in-cell simulations of compressible turbulence. At magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) scales, compressive fluctuations are damped via transit-time damping (TTD), naturally producing suprathermal electrons and proton beams. At sub-ion scales, quasi-perpendicular fast modes excite multiple branches of ion Bernstein waves, whose properties agree with predictions from the plasma dispersion relation solver. Under solar wind conditions, TTD remains efficient and provides a natural explanation for the super-Alfv\'enic proton beams measured in situ. Our results demonstrate that compressive fluctuations play a central role in driving cross-scale energy transfer and kinetic dissipation in collisionless plasma turbulence.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

PIC simulations tie compressive turbulence to proton beams via TTD and to Bernstein waves at smaller scales, but the numerics need explicit checks to hold up.

read the letter

The central claim is that high-resolution PIC runs of compressible turbulence show transit-time damping at MHD scales generating suprathermal electrons and super-Alfvenic proton beams, while sub-ion fast modes drive ion Bernstein waves whose frequencies and properties match a linear dispersion solver. Under solar wind parameters this supplies a direct route from compressive fluctuations to the beams seen in situ. That cross-scale link is the main new piece; prior work has treated TTD and Bernstein waves separately, so putting both in one compressible setup is the concrete step forward. The simulations also reproduce the expected wave branches without extra tuning, which is a clean result on that part of the story. The approach uses standard PIC methods on an established problem, so the advance is in the application rather than a new formalism. The soft spot is exactly the one flagged in the stress test. PIC runs that span MHD compression down to ion scales are vulnerable to particle noise, grid dispersion, and artificial scattering that can populate or alter suprathermal tails. The abstract gives no numbers on particles per cell, cells per ion inertial length, or Debye resolution, and no mention of convergence tests appears in the provided summary. Without those, the reported beam velocities could contain a numerical contribution rather than being a pure demonstration of TTD efficiency. If the full methods section shows solid resolution studies and parameter scans, that concern shrinks; right now it sits at the center of the result. This paper is for solar-wind kineticists and turbulence modelers who want simulation evidence connecting in-situ beam observations to compressive driving. A reader already working on dissipation mechanisms or PIC validation would get usable material from the wave comparison and the TTD-beam pathway. It is worth sending to referees because the topic is directly relevant to current spacecraft data and the simulation framework is reproducible in principle, even though the numerical robustness section will require close attention and likely revision.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper uses high-resolution particle-in-cell simulations of compressible turbulence to argue that transit-time damping (TTD) of compressive fluctuations at MHD scales generates suprathermal electrons and proton beams, while quasi-perpendicular fast modes at sub-ion scales excite ion Bernstein waves matching dispersion-relation predictions. It concludes that TTD remains efficient under solar wind conditions and naturally explains observed super-Alfvénic proton beams.

Significance. If the simulations robustly isolate physical TTD from numerical effects, the result would be significant for solar-wind physics by linking compressible turbulence directly to beam formation and cross-scale dissipation without additional free parameters or external drivers.

major comments (2)

[Simulation setup] Simulation setup (methods section): no values are reported for particles per cell, cells per ion inertial length, or Debye-length resolution, and no convergence tests with varied resolution are shown. Because the central claim that TTD produces the observed beams depends on these runs being free of particle noise and artificial scattering, the absence of such data makes the result load-bearing and unverifiable from the given information.
[Results] Results on proton beam velocities: the reported beam speeds are stated to match solar-wind observations, but no quantitative comparison, error bars, or sensitivity to initial conditions is provided. This weakens the assertion that TTD is the natural explanation, as the match could be influenced by numerical seeding of tails.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract and introduction use “high-resolution” without defining the scale relative to ion inertial length or Debye length; a single sentence specifying these ratios would improve clarity.
[Figures] Figure captions for the wave spectra should explicitly state the time interval and spatial averaging used, to allow direct comparison with the dispersion-relation solver results mentioned in the text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. We respond to each major comment below and indicate where revisions will be made.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Simulation setup] Simulation setup (methods section): no values are reported for particles per cell, cells per ion inertial length, or Debye-length resolution, and no convergence tests with varied resolution are shown. Because the central claim that TTD produces the observed beams depends on these runs being free of particle noise and artificial scattering, the absence of such data makes the result load-bearing and unverifiable from the given information.

Authors: We agree that these parameters are necessary to assess numerical fidelity. The manuscript omitted explicit reporting of particles per cell, cells per ion inertial length, and Debye-length resolution, as well as convergence tests. In the revised manuscript we will add these values and any available resolution studies to the methods section. revision: yes
Referee: [Results] Results on proton beam velocities: the reported beam speeds are stated to match solar-wind observations, but no quantitative comparison, error bars, or sensitivity to initial conditions is provided. This weakens the assertion that TTD is the natural explanation, as the match could be influenced by numerical seeding of tails.

Authors: The manuscript states a match to solar-wind beam speeds but presents only a qualitative statement without quantitative metrics or error bars. We will strengthen this section in revision by adding quantitative comparisons (including error estimates) and a brief discussion of sensitivity to initial conditions. Full parameter-space scans would require additional runs beyond the present study. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; simulation outcomes independent of inputs

full rationale

The paper reports outcomes from high-resolution PIC simulations of compressible turbulence, with proton beams attributed to transit-time damping at MHD scales and ion Bernstein waves to fast modes at sub-ion scales. No derivation chain, equations, or claims reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations. Results are presented as direct simulation findings compared against solar wind observations and a plasma dispersion solver, remaining self-contained without circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only; no explicit free parameters, new entities, or non-standard axioms are stated. Standard plasma dispersion relations and PIC numerics are assumed as background.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Transit-time damping efficiently damps compressive fluctuations in collisionless plasmas at MHD scales
Invoked in abstract to explain beam formation; standard in plasma turbulence literature but not derived here.
domain assumption Quasi-perpendicular fast modes excite ion Bernstein waves whose properties match the plasma dispersion relation
Stated as agreement with solver predictions; relies on linear theory assumptions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5690 in / 1213 out tokens · 19465 ms · 2026-05-25T06:49:24.479092+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

[1]

Tu and E

C.-Y. Tu and E. Marsch, Solar Physics171, 363 (1997)

work page 1997
[2]

J. He, L. Wang, C. Tu, E. Marsch, and Q. Zong, The Astrophysical Journal Letters800, L31 (2015)

work page 2015
[3]

Huang, J

J. Huang, J. C. Kasper, D. Vech, K. G. Klein, M. Stevens, M. M. Martinovi´ c, B. L. Alterman, T. ˇDurovcov´ a, K. Paulson, B. A. Maruca,et al., The Astrophysical Jour- nal Supplement Series246, 70 (2020)

work page 2020
[4]

De Marco, R

R. De Marco, R. Bruno, V. K. Jagarlamudi, R. d’Amicis, M. Marcucci, V. Fortunato, D. Perrone, D. Telloni, C. Owen, P. Louarn,et al., Astronomy & Astrophysics 669, A108 (2023)

work page 2023
[5]

Verniero, B

J. Verniero, B. Chandran, D. Larson, K. Paulson, B. Al- terman, S. Badman, S. Bale, J. Bonnell, T. Bowen, T. D. de Wit,et al., The Astrophysical Journal924, 112 (2022)

work page 2022
[6]

L. K. Jian, C. T. Russell, J. G. Luhmann, R. J. Strange- way, J. S. Leisner, and A. B. Galvin, The Astrophysical Journal701, L105 (2009)

work page 2009
[7]

T. A. Bowen, B. D. Chandran, J. Squire, S. D. Bale, D. Duan, K. G. Klein, D. Larson, A. Mallet, M. D. Mc- Manus, R. Meyrand,et al., Physical Review Letters129, 165101 (2022)

work page 2022
[8]

Livi and E

S. Livi and E. Marsch, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics92, 7255 (1987)

work page 1987
[9]

Tu, L.-H

C.-Y. Tu, L.-H. Wang, and E. Marsch, Journal of Geo- physical Research: Space Physics107, SSH (2002)

work page 2002
[10]

J. A. Araneda, E. Marsch, and A. F.-Vi˜ nas, Physical re- view letters100, 125003 (2008)

work page 2008
[11]

Lavraud, R

B. Lavraud, R. Kieokaew, N. Fargette, P. Louarn, A. Fe- dorov, N. Andre, G. Fruit, V. G´ enot, V. R´ eville, A. P. Rouillard,et al., Astronomy & Astrophysics656, A37 (2021)

work page 2021
[12]

Y. Tong, I. Y. Vasko, A. V. Artemyev, S. D. Bale, and F. S. Mozer, The Astrophysical Journal878, 41 (2019)

work page 2019
[13]

L. Jian, H. Wei, C. Russell, J. Luhmann, B. Klecker, N. Omidi, P. Isenberg, M. Goldstein, A. Figueroa-Vi˜ nas, and X. Blanco-Cano, The Astrophysical Journal786, 123 (2014)

work page 2014
[14]

Huang, J

S. Huang, J. Zhang, F. Sahraoui, J. He, Z. Yuan, N. Andr´ es, L. Hadid, X. Deng, K. Jiang, L. Yu,et al., The Astrophysical journal letters897, L3 (2020)

work page 2020
[15]

C. J. Joyce, C. W. Smith, P. A. Isenberg, S. P. Gary, N. Murphy, P. C. Gray, and L. F. Burlaga, The Astro- physical Journal745, 112 (2012)

work page 2012
[16]

O. W. Roberts, D. Verscharen, Y. Narita, R. Nakamura, Z. V¨ or¨ os, and F. Plaschke, Physical Review Research2, 043253 (2020)

work page 2020
[17]

L. Turc, O. W. Roberts, D. Verscharen, A. P. Dimmock, P. Kajdiˇ c, M. Palmroth, Y. Pfau-Kempf, A. Johlander, M. Dubart, E. K. Kilpua,et al., Nature Physics19, 78 (2023)

work page 2023
[18]

J. J. Podesta, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics117(2012)

work page 2012
[19]

Makwana and H

K. Makwana and H. Yan, Physical Review X10, 031021 (2020)

work page 2020
[20]

Zhang, A

H. Zhang, A. Chepurnov, H. Yan, K. Makwana, R. Santos-Lima, and S. Appleby, Nature Astronomy4, 1001 (2020)

work page 2020
[21]

S. Zhao, H. Yan, T. Z. Liu, K. H. Yuen, and M. Shi, The Astrophysical Journal962, 89 (2024)

work page 2024
[22]

Pavaskar, K

P. Pavaskar, K. H. Yuen, H. Yan, and S. Malik, The Astrophysical Journal971, 58 (2024)

work page 2024
[23]

Zhang and Y

J. Zhang and Y. Hu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.04119 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[24]

Adhikari, G

L. Adhikari, G. P. Zank, L.-L. Zhao, J. C. Kasper, K. E. Korreck, M. Stevens, A. W. Case, P. Whittlesey, D. Lar- son, R. Livi,et al., The Astrophysical Journal Supple- ment Series246, 38 (2020)

work page 2020
[25]

S. Q. Zhao, H. Yan, T. Z. Liu, M. Liu, and M. Shi, The Astrophysical Journal923, 253 (2021)

work page 2021
[26]

Yan and A

H. Yan and A. Lazarian, The Astrophysical Journal614, 757 (2004)

work page 2004
[27]

C. Hou, H. Yan, S. Zhao, and P. Pavaskar, The Astro- physical Journal Letters992, L28 (2025)

work page 2025
[28]

T. K. Suzuki, A. Lazarian, and A. Beresnyak, The As- trophysical Journal662, 1033 (2007)

work page 2007
[29]

K. J. Bowers, B. J. Albright, L. Yin, W. Daughton, V. Roytershteyn, B. Bergen, and T. J. Kwan, inJournal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 180 (IOP Publishing,

work page
[30]

Galtier, Journal of Plasma Physics89, 905890205 (2023)

S. Galtier, Journal of Plasma Physics89, 905890205 (2023)

work page 2023
[31]

S. Zhao, H. Yan, T. Z. Liu, and C. Hou, The Astrophys- ical Journal996, 46 (2026)

work page 2026
[32]

Cho and A

J. Cho and A. Lazarian, Physical Review Letters88, 245001 (2002)

work page 2002
[33]

S. Zhao, H. Yan, T. Z. Liu, M. Liu, and H. Wang, The Astrophysical Journal937, 102 (2022)

work page 2022
[34]

Q. Luo, X. Zhu, J. He, J. Cui, H. Lai, D. Verscharen, and D. Duan, The Astrophysical Journal928, 36 (2022)

work page 2022
[35]

K. H. Yuen, H. Li, and H. Yan, The Astrophysical Jour- nal986, 221 (2025)

work page 2025
[36]

Comi¸ sel, Y

H. Comi¸ sel, Y. Narita, and U. Motschmann, Earth, Plan- ets and Space67, 32 (2015)

work page 2015
[37]

Balogh and R

A. Balogh and R. A. Treumann,Physics of collisionless shocks: space plasma shock waves(Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

work page 2013
[38]

Petrosian, H

V. Petrosian, H. Yan, and A. Lazarian, The Astrophysical Journal644, 603 (2006)

work page 2006
[39]

Yan and A

H. Yan and A. Lazarian, The Astrophysical Journal673, 942 (2008)

work page 2008
[40]

Cho and A

J. Cho and A. Lazarian, MNRAS345, 325 (2003)

work page 2003
[41]

Narita, R

Y. Narita, R. Nakamura, W. Baumjohann, K.-H. Glass- meier, U. Motschmann, and H. Comi¸ sel, inAnnales Geo- physicae, Vol. 34 (Copernicus Publications G¨ ottingen, Germany, 2016) pp. 85–89

work page 2016
[42]

Huang, D

J. Huang, D. E. Larson, T. Ervin, M. Liu, O. Ortiz, M. M. Martinovi´ c, Z. Huang, A. Chasapis, X. Chu, B. Alter- man,et al., The Astrophysical Journal Letters986, L28 (2025)

work page 2025

[1] [1]

Tu and E

C.-Y. Tu and E. Marsch, Solar Physics171, 363 (1997)

work page 1997

[2] [2]

J. He, L. Wang, C. Tu, E. Marsch, and Q. Zong, The Astrophysical Journal Letters800, L31 (2015)

work page 2015

[3] [3]

Huang, J

J. Huang, J. C. Kasper, D. Vech, K. G. Klein, M. Stevens, M. M. Martinovi´ c, B. L. Alterman, T. ˇDurovcov´ a, K. Paulson, B. A. Maruca,et al., The Astrophysical Jour- nal Supplement Series246, 70 (2020)

work page 2020

[4] [4]

De Marco, R

R. De Marco, R. Bruno, V. K. Jagarlamudi, R. d’Amicis, M. Marcucci, V. Fortunato, D. Perrone, D. Telloni, C. Owen, P. Louarn,et al., Astronomy & Astrophysics 669, A108 (2023)

work page 2023

[5] [5]

Verniero, B

J. Verniero, B. Chandran, D. Larson, K. Paulson, B. Al- terman, S. Badman, S. Bale, J. Bonnell, T. Bowen, T. D. de Wit,et al., The Astrophysical Journal924, 112 (2022)

work page 2022

[6] [6]

L. K. Jian, C. T. Russell, J. G. Luhmann, R. J. Strange- way, J. S. Leisner, and A. B. Galvin, The Astrophysical Journal701, L105 (2009)

work page 2009

[7] [7]

T. A. Bowen, B. D. Chandran, J. Squire, S. D. Bale, D. Duan, K. G. Klein, D. Larson, A. Mallet, M. D. Mc- Manus, R. Meyrand,et al., Physical Review Letters129, 165101 (2022)

work page 2022

[8] [8]

Livi and E

S. Livi and E. Marsch, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics92, 7255 (1987)

work page 1987

[9] [9]

Tu, L.-H

C.-Y. Tu, L.-H. Wang, and E. Marsch, Journal of Geo- physical Research: Space Physics107, SSH (2002)

work page 2002

[10] [10]

J. A. Araneda, E. Marsch, and A. F.-Vi˜ nas, Physical re- view letters100, 125003 (2008)

work page 2008

[11] [11]

Lavraud, R

B. Lavraud, R. Kieokaew, N. Fargette, P. Louarn, A. Fe- dorov, N. Andre, G. Fruit, V. G´ enot, V. R´ eville, A. P. Rouillard,et al., Astronomy & Astrophysics656, A37 (2021)

work page 2021

[12] [12]

Y. Tong, I. Y. Vasko, A. V. Artemyev, S. D. Bale, and F. S. Mozer, The Astrophysical Journal878, 41 (2019)

work page 2019

[13] [13]

L. Jian, H. Wei, C. Russell, J. Luhmann, B. Klecker, N. Omidi, P. Isenberg, M. Goldstein, A. Figueroa-Vi˜ nas, and X. Blanco-Cano, The Astrophysical Journal786, 123 (2014)

work page 2014

[14] [14]

Huang, J

S. Huang, J. Zhang, F. Sahraoui, J. He, Z. Yuan, N. Andr´ es, L. Hadid, X. Deng, K. Jiang, L. Yu,et al., The Astrophysical journal letters897, L3 (2020)

work page 2020

[15] [15]

C. J. Joyce, C. W. Smith, P. A. Isenberg, S. P. Gary, N. Murphy, P. C. Gray, and L. F. Burlaga, The Astro- physical Journal745, 112 (2012)

work page 2012

[16] [16]

O. W. Roberts, D. Verscharen, Y. Narita, R. Nakamura, Z. V¨ or¨ os, and F. Plaschke, Physical Review Research2, 043253 (2020)

work page 2020

[17] [17]

L. Turc, O. W. Roberts, D. Verscharen, A. P. Dimmock, P. Kajdiˇ c, M. Palmroth, Y. Pfau-Kempf, A. Johlander, M. Dubart, E. K. Kilpua,et al., Nature Physics19, 78 (2023)

work page 2023

[18] [18]

J. J. Podesta, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics117(2012)

work page 2012

[19] [19]

Makwana and H

K. Makwana and H. Yan, Physical Review X10, 031021 (2020)

work page 2020

[20] [20]

Zhang, A

H. Zhang, A. Chepurnov, H. Yan, K. Makwana, R. Santos-Lima, and S. Appleby, Nature Astronomy4, 1001 (2020)

work page 2020

[21] [21]

S. Zhao, H. Yan, T. Z. Liu, K. H. Yuen, and M. Shi, The Astrophysical Journal962, 89 (2024)

work page 2024

[22] [22]

Pavaskar, K

P. Pavaskar, K. H. Yuen, H. Yan, and S. Malik, The Astrophysical Journal971, 58 (2024)

work page 2024

[23] [23]

Zhang and Y

J. Zhang and Y. Hu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.04119 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025

[24] [24]

Adhikari, G

L. Adhikari, G. P. Zank, L.-L. Zhao, J. C. Kasper, K. E. Korreck, M. Stevens, A. W. Case, P. Whittlesey, D. Lar- son, R. Livi,et al., The Astrophysical Journal Supple- ment Series246, 38 (2020)

work page 2020

[25] [25]

S. Q. Zhao, H. Yan, T. Z. Liu, M. Liu, and M. Shi, The Astrophysical Journal923, 253 (2021)

work page 2021

[26] [26]

Yan and A

H. Yan and A. Lazarian, The Astrophysical Journal614, 757 (2004)

work page 2004

[27] [27]

C. Hou, H. Yan, S. Zhao, and P. Pavaskar, The Astro- physical Journal Letters992, L28 (2025)

work page 2025

[28] [28]

T. K. Suzuki, A. Lazarian, and A. Beresnyak, The As- trophysical Journal662, 1033 (2007)

work page 2007

[29] [29]

K. J. Bowers, B. J. Albright, L. Yin, W. Daughton, V. Roytershteyn, B. Bergen, and T. J. Kwan, inJournal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 180 (IOP Publishing,

work page

[30] [30]

Galtier, Journal of Plasma Physics89, 905890205 (2023)

S. Galtier, Journal of Plasma Physics89, 905890205 (2023)

work page 2023

[31] [31]

S. Zhao, H. Yan, T. Z. Liu, and C. Hou, The Astrophys- ical Journal996, 46 (2026)

work page 2026

[32] [32]

Cho and A

J. Cho and A. Lazarian, Physical Review Letters88, 245001 (2002)

work page 2002

[33] [33]

S. Zhao, H. Yan, T. Z. Liu, M. Liu, and H. Wang, The Astrophysical Journal937, 102 (2022)

work page 2022

[34] [34]

Q. Luo, X. Zhu, J. He, J. Cui, H. Lai, D. Verscharen, and D. Duan, The Astrophysical Journal928, 36 (2022)

work page 2022

[35] [35]

K. H. Yuen, H. Li, and H. Yan, The Astrophysical Jour- nal986, 221 (2025)

work page 2025

[36] [36]

Comi¸ sel, Y

H. Comi¸ sel, Y. Narita, and U. Motschmann, Earth, Plan- ets and Space67, 32 (2015)

work page 2015

[37] [37]

Balogh and R

A. Balogh and R. A. Treumann,Physics of collisionless shocks: space plasma shock waves(Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

work page 2013

[38] [38]

Petrosian, H

V. Petrosian, H. Yan, and A. Lazarian, The Astrophysical Journal644, 603 (2006)

work page 2006

[39] [39]

Yan and A

H. Yan and A. Lazarian, The Astrophysical Journal673, 942 (2008)

work page 2008

[40] [40]

Cho and A

J. Cho and A. Lazarian, MNRAS345, 325 (2003)

work page 2003

[41] [41]

Narita, R

Y. Narita, R. Nakamura, W. Baumjohann, K.-H. Glass- meier, U. Motschmann, and H. Comi¸ sel, inAnnales Geo- physicae, Vol. 34 (Copernicus Publications G¨ ottingen, Germany, 2016) pp. 85–89

work page 2016

[42] [42]

Huang, D

J. Huang, D. E. Larson, T. Ervin, M. Liu, O. Ortiz, M. M. Martinovi´ c, Z. Huang, A. Chasapis, X. Chu, B. Alter- man,et al., The Astrophysical Journal Letters986, L28 (2025)

work page 2025