Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Funding Valuation Adjustment: a consistent framework including CVA, DVA, collateral,netting rules and re-hypothecation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1112.1521 v2 pith:FV4S57GX submitted 2011-12-07 q-fin.PR q-fin.RM

classification q-fin.PRq-fin.RM
keywords fundingframeworkpricingvaluationcounterpartyequationmarginingrisk
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper we describe how to include funding and margining costs into a risk-neutral pricing framework for counterparty credit risk. We consider realistic settings and we include in our models the common market practices suggested by the ISDA documentation without assuming restrictive constraints on margining procedures and close-out netting rules. In particular, we allow for asymmetric collateral and funding rates, and exogenous liquidity policies and hedging strategies. Re-hypothecation liquidity risk and close-out amount evaluation issues are also covered. We define a comprehensive pricing framework which allows us to derive earlier results on funding or counterparty risk. Some relevant examples illustrate the non trivial settings needed to derive known facts about discounting curves by starting from a general framework and without resorting to ad hoc hypotheses. Our main result is a bilateral collateralized counterparty valuation adjusted pricing equation, which allows to price a deal while taking into account credit and debt valuation adjustments along with margining and funding costs in a coherent way. We find that the equation has a recursive form, making the introduction of an additive funding valuation adjustment difficult. Yet, we can cast the pricing equation into a set of iterative relationships which can be solved by means of standard least-square Monte Carlo techniques.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Robust Hedging Valuation Adjustment for Deep Hedging Policies under Market Frictions

    q-fin.RM 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A common-stress reserve framework for deep hedgers shows classical trading bands usually beat learned policies, with sparse learned execution winning only under a strict low-liquidity budget.

Pith tools