pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.22081 · v1 · pith:FXWRUV4Vnew · submitted 2026-06-20 · ⚛️ physics.app-ph

Steerable Radiation Forces with Frequency-Detuned Acoustic Metasurfaces

Sam Keller , Matthew Stein , Ognjen Ilic This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 11:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.app-ph
keywords acoustic metasurfaceradiation forcefrequency detuningsteerable motionultrasonic waves3D-printed metasurfaceremote manipulation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Patterning objects with acoustic metasurfaces turns small frequency detunings into reversible steering forces and torques.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that acoustic waves can steer macroscopic objects by applying only small changes to the wave frequency. An object covered with a designed metasurface converts a positive or negative frequency shift into radiation forces and torques that point in opposite directions. This produces controlled translation and rotation even when the object is much larger than the sound wavelength, shown at 22.5 kHz with 2.5 kHz detuning using 3D-printed samples. The design achieves fully reversible motion in real time without moving the wave source or changing its strength. A sympathetic reader would see this as a route to remote control of large items through programmable surface patterns.

Core claim

Acoustic waves can induce controlled translation and rotation of macroscopic objects through small, but deliberate, detuning of the driving wave frequency. When an object is patterned with a suitably designed acoustic metasurface, small changes in the incident frequency ω ± δω are converted into directional radiation forces and torques, enabling steerable motion even for objects much larger than the acoustic wavelength. The concept of a force-optimal metasurface topology enables fully reversible forces in real time: the object is moved in one direction for positively detuned incident frequency ω+δω and in the opposite direction for negatively detuned frequency ω−δω, where ω=22.5 kHz and δω=2

What carries the argument

The force-optimal metasurface topology that converts frequency detuning into directional radiation forces and torques.

If this is right

  • The object translates and rotates in opposite directions for positive versus negative frequency detuning.
  • Fully reversible real-time steering is achieved without altering wave direction or intensity.
  • The approach scales across frequencies and materials.
  • Complex remote-controlled behaviors become programmable through surface pattern choices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Frequency-based steering could combine with existing acoustic sources to control multiple objects tuned to different base frequencies at once.
  • If surface patterns can be switched dynamically, the same object could follow changing paths without external sensors.
  • The method may extend contactless transport techniques to objects too large for conventional acoustic trapping.

Load-bearing premise

A force-optimal metasurface topology exists that converts frequency detuning into fully reversible directional forces.

What would settle it

An experiment in which the force direction fails to reverse when the sign of the frequency detuning is flipped on an object carrying the designed metasurface.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.22081 by Matthew Stein, Ognjen Ilic, Sam Keller.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Conceptual illustration of programmable control of radiation forces enabled by acoustic frequency detuning: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Analytic design principle for metasurfaces that encode [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Actuation using force-optimized acousto-mechanical metasurfaces: design, fabrication, and experimental results. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Torque control via frequency detuning. (a) Small and deliberate detuning of the acoustic excitation (±δω) reverses the induced torque, demonstrating reversible rotational actuation. (b) Embedding force-optimized metasurfaces on rectangular and cylin￾drical objects demonstrates how patterned surface coverage (surface fill) can tailor rotational response while leaving unpatterned regions as space for integra… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We demonstrate that acoustic waves can induce controlled translation and rotation of macroscopic objects through small, but deliberate, detuning of the driving wave frequency. When an object is patterned with a suitably designed acoustic metasurface, small changes in the incident frequency $\omega \pm \delta \omega$ are converted into directional radiation forces and torques, enabling steerable motion even for objects much larger than the acoustic wavelength. We present the concept of a force-optimal metasurface topology and show that it enables fully reversible forces in real time: the object is moved in one direction for positively detuned incident frequency $\omega+\delta \omega$ and in the opposite direction for negatively detuned frequency $\omega-\delta \omega$, where $\omega=22.5 \textrm{ kHz}$ and $\delta \omega =2.5 \textrm{ kHz}$ for a proof of concept at inaudible frequencies. This mechanism is demonstrated experimentally at ultrasonic frequencies with 3D-printed metasurfaces. The proposed concept is scalable across frequencies and materials, offering a building block for realizing complex, remote-controlled, dynamical behaviors that can be programmed by reconfiguring material surface patterns.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims that patterning macroscopic objects with acoustic metasurfaces allows small frequency detunings (ω ± δω around 22.5 kHz with δω = 2.5 kHz) to produce directional radiation forces and torques for steerable translation and rotation, even for objects much larger than the wavelength. It introduces a force-optimal metasurface topology enabling fully reversible forces (positive detuning moves the object one way, negative the opposite) and reports an experimental demonstration using 3D-printed metasurfaces at ultrasonic frequencies, with the approach presented as scalable.

Significance. If the central experimental claim holds, the work would introduce a frequency-based mechanism for remote acoustic manipulation of large objects without requiring mechanical reconfiguration, offering a building block for programmable dynamical behaviors. The scalability across frequencies and materials is a notable strength, as is the focus on reversible, real-time steering via detuning.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The manuscript asserts an experimental demonstration with 3D-printed metasurfaces at the specified frequencies but supplies no quantitative force measurements, error bars, design parameters of the metasurface, or comparison between experiment and simulation, rendering the central claim of steerable motion unverifiable from the provided text.
  2. [Concept and proof of concept] Concept and proof of concept paragraph: The claim that a force-optimal metasurface topology exists which converts frequency detuning into fully reversible directional forces satisfying F(ω + δω) = -F(ω - δω) with comparable magnitude over the 11% detuning range lacks supporting analytical derivation, numerical optimization results, or experimental verification that sign reversal occurs without residual net force or magnitude imbalance due to frequency-dependent effects.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The comments highlight areas where the presentation of evidence can be strengthened for clarity. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The manuscript asserts an experimental demonstration with 3D-printed metasurfaces at the specified frequencies but supplies no quantitative force measurements, error bars, design parameters of the metasurface, or comparison between experiment and simulation, rendering the central claim of steerable motion unverifiable from the provided text.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would be more informative if it included key quantitative results. The full manuscript contains experimental force data, error analysis, metasurface design parameters, and simulation comparisons in the results section and figures. In revision we will update the abstract to report representative measured force magnitudes (with error bars), the 11% detuning range, and a statement on experiment-simulation agreement. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Concept and proof of concept] Concept and proof of concept paragraph: The claim that a force-optimal metasurface topology exists which converts frequency detuning into fully reversible directional forces satisfying F(ω + δω) = -F(ω - δω) with comparable magnitude over the 11% detuning range lacks supporting analytical derivation, numerical optimization results, or experimental verification that sign reversal occurs without residual net force or magnitude imbalance due to frequency-dependent effects.

    Authors: The manuscript demonstrates the force-optimal topology and reversible behavior through numerical optimization and experiments, including data confirming sign reversal and comparable magnitudes. However, an explicit analytical derivation of the exact antisymmetry condition F(ω + δω) = -F(ω - δω) is not provided in the main text. We will add a concise analytical model and the optimization procedure to the revised manuscript (or supplementary information) to address this gap while retaining the existing numerical and experimental evidence. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental demonstration with no self-referential derivation or fitted predictions

full rationale

The paper's central claim rests on presenting a metasurface concept and demonstrating it experimentally with 3D-printed samples at ultrasonic frequencies. No equations, parameters, or derivations are shown that reduce to inputs by construction. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing for uniqueness or ansatz. The result is self-contained against external benchmarks via physical experiment rather than internal fitting or renaming.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard acoustic wave propagation and scattering together with the existence of an optimized metasurface topology; no new physical entities or ad-hoc constants are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Linear acoustic wave propagation and momentum transfer via scattering
    Invoked implicitly when radiation forces are discussed.
  • domain assumption Existence of a metasurface geometry that maps frequency offset to force direction reversal
    Stated as the 'suitably designed' and 'force-optimal' topology required for the effect.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5735 in / 1172 out tokens · 41410 ms · 2026-06-26T11:02:09.528593+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    E. H. Brandt, Suspended by sound, Nature413, 474 (2001)

    2001

  2. [2]

    Baresch, J.-L

    D. Baresch, J.-L. Thomas, and R. Marchiano, Observation of a single-beam gradient force acoustical trap for elastic particles: Acoustical tweezers, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 024301 (2016)

    2016

  3. [3]

    Marzo, A

    A. Marzo, A. Barnes, and B. W. Drinkwater, TinyLev: A multi- emitter single-axis acoustic levitator, Rev. Sci. Instrum.88, 085105 (2017)

    2017

  4. [4]

    M. A. B. Andrade, A. Marzo, and J. C. Adamowski, Acoustic levitation in mid-air: Recent advances, challenges, and future perspectives, Appl. Phys. Lett.116, 250501 (2020)

    2020

  5. [5]

    Anh ¨auser, R

    A. Anh ¨auser, R. Wunenburger, and E. Brasselet, Acoustic ro- tational manipulation using orbital angular momentum transfer, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 034301 (2012)

    2012

  6. [6]

    Foresti and D

    D. Foresti and D. Poulikakos, Acoustophoretic contactless eleva- tion, orbital transport and spinning of matter in air, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 024301 (2014)

    2014

  7. [7]

    Melde, A

    K. Melde, A. G. Mark, T. Qiu, and P. Fischer, Holograms for acoustics, Nature537, 518 (2016)

    2016

  8. [8]

    Baresch, J.-L

    D. Baresch, J.-L. Thomas, and R. Marchiano, Orbital angular momentum transfer to stably trapped elastic particles in acoustical vortex beams, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 074301 (2018)

    2018

  9. [9]

    Baresch and V

    D. Baresch and V . Garbin, Acoustic trapping of microbubbles in complex environments and controlled payload release, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.117, 15490 (2020)

    2020

  10. [10]

    J. Li, C. Shen, T. J. Huang, and S. A. Cummer, Acoustic tweezer with complex boundary-free trapping and transport channel con- trolled by shadow waveguides, Sci Adv7, 10.1126/sciadv.abi5502 (2021). 8

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.abi5502 2021

  11. [11]

    Z. Yang, K. L. H. Cole, Y . Qiu, I. M. L. Somorjai, P. Wijesinghe, J. Nylk, S. Cochran, G. C. Spalding, D. A. Lyons, and K. Dholakia, Light sheet microscopy with acoustic sample confinement, Nat. Commun.10, 669 (2019)

    2019

  12. [12]

    Hoshi, M

    T. Hoshi, M. Takahashi, T. Iwamoto, and H. Shinoda, Noncontact tactile display based on radiation pressure of airborne ultrasound, IEEE Trans. Haptics3, 155 (2010)

    2010

  13. [13]

    Hirayama, D

    R. Hirayama, D. Martinez Plasencia, N. Masuda, and S. Subrama- nian, A volumetric display for visual, tactile and audio presentation using acoustic trapping, Nature575, 320 (2019)

    2019

  14. [14]

    Fushimi, A

    T. Fushimi, A. Marzo, B. W. Drinkwater, and T. L. Hill, Acoustophoretic volumetric displays using a fast-moving levitated particle, Appl. Phys. Lett.115, 064101 (2019)

    2019

  15. [15]

    Vandaele, P

    V . Vandaele, P. Lambert, and A. Delchambre, Non-contact han- dling in microassembly: Acoustical levitation, Precis. Eng.29, 491 (2005)

    2005

  16. [16]

    M. X. Lim, A. Souslov, V . Vitelli, and H. M. Jaeger, Cluster formation by acoustic forces and active fluctuations in levitated granular matter, Nat. Phys.15, 460 (2019)

    2019

  17. [17]

    Y . Xie, W. Wang, H. Chen, A. Konneker, B.-I. Popa, and S. A. Cummer, Wavefront modulation and subwavelength diffractive acoustics with an acoustic metasurface, Nat. Commun.5, 5553 (2014)

    2014

  18. [18]

    G. Ma, M. Yang, S. Xiao, Z. Yang, and P. Sheng, Acoustic meta- surface with hybrid resonances, Nat. Mater.13, 873 (2014)

    2014

  19. [19]

    S. A. Cummer, J. Christensen, and A. Al`u, Controlling sound with acoustic metamaterials, Nature Reviews Materials1, 1 (2016)

    2016

  20. [20]

    Z. J. Wong, Y . Wang, K. O’Brien, J. Rho, X. Yin, S. Zhang, N. Fang, T.-J. Yen, and X. Zhang, Optical and acoustic metamate- rials: superlens, negative refractive index and invisibility cloak, J. Opt.19, 084007 (2017)

    2017

  21. [21]

    H. Ge, M. Yang, C. Ma, M.-H. Lu, Y .-F. Chen, N. Fang, and P. Sheng, Breaking the barriers: advances in acoustic functional materials, Natl. Sci. Rev.5, 159 (2018)

    2018

  22. [22]

    Stein, S

    M. Stein, S. Keller, Y . Luo, and O. Ilic, Shaping contactless radia- tion forces through anomalous acoustic scattering, Nat. Commun. 13, 6533 (2022)

    2022

  23. [23]

    Assouar, B

    B. Assouar, B. Liang, Y . Wu, Y . Li, J.-C. Cheng, and Y . Jing, Acoustic metasurfaces, Nature Reviews Materials3, 460 (2018)

    2018

  24. [24]

    Zhu, X.-D

    Y .-F. Zhu, X.-D. Fan, B. Liang, J. Yang, J. Yang, L.-L. Yin, and J.- C. Cheng, Multi-frequency acoustic metasurface for extraordinary reflection and sound focusing, AIP Adv.6, 121702 (2016)

    2016

  25. [25]

    Zhang and C

    D. Zhang and C. Ma, Acoustic metamaterials for remote manipu- lation of large objects in water, Mater. Horiz.12, 4639 (2025)

    2025

  26. [26]

    Ilic and H

    O. Ilic and H. A. Atwater, Self-stabilizing photonic levitation and propulsion of nanostructured macroscopic objects, Nat. Photonics 13, 289 (2019)

    2019

  27. [27]

    Siegel, A

    J. Siegel, A. Y . Wang, S. G. Menabde, M. A. Kats, M. S. Jang, and V . W. Brar, Self-stabilizing laser sails based on optical metasur- faces, ACS Photonics6, 2032 (2019)

    2032

  28. [28]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for details on optimized metasurfaces and the experimental setup

  29. [29]

    Glynne-Jones, P

    P. Glynne-Jones, P. P. Mishra, R. J. Boltryk, and M. Hill, Efficient finite element modeling of radiation forces on elastic particles of arbitrary size and geometry, J. Acoust. Soc. Am.133, 1885 (2013)

    2013

  30. [30]

    T. H. Rowan,Functional stability analysis of numerical algo- rithms, Ph.D. thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA (1990)

    1990

  31. [31]

    S. G. Johnson, The NLopt nonlinear-optimization package, http: //ab-initio.mit.edu/nlopt

  32. [32]

    Bertoldi, V

    K. Bertoldi, V . Vitelli, J. Christensen, and M. van Hecke, Flexible mechanical metamaterials, Nature Reviews Materials2, 1 (2017)

    2017

  33. [33]

    Y . Jin, R. Kumar, O. Poncelet, O. Mondain-Monval, and T. Brunet, Flat acoustics with soft gradient-index metasurfaces, Nat. Com- mun.10, 143 (2019)

    2019

  34. [34]

    Nassar, B

    H. Nassar, B. Yousefzadeh, R. Fleury, M. Ruzzene, A. Al `u, C. Daraio, A. N. Norris, G. Huang, and M. R. Haberman, Nonre- ciprocity in acoustic and elastic materials, Nature Reviews Materi- als5, 667 (2020)

    2020