Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 95 references

Regularity of Resolutions and Limits of Manifolds with a Uniform Contractibility Function

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that Gromov–Hausdorff limits of closed n-manifolds with a uniform contractibility function are cell-like images of the approximating manifolds when n≥4 and the limit is an ANR.

desk verdict A credible, substantial proof of Moore's conjecture in the ANR setting, with a repairable gap in the first proof's use of Grove–Petersen–Wu. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.17557 v1 pith:FZBKQ6EK submitted 2025-07-23 math.MG math.DGmath.GT

Mohammad Alattar , Lewis Tadman This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.MGmath.DGmath.GT MSC 53C2354C5557P05
keywords Gromov–Hausdorffconvergenceuniformcontractibilityfunctioncell-likemapshomologymanifoldsresolutionsANRAlexandrovspacesPL-smoothingobstruction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves a structural rigidity statement about Gromov–Hausdorff convergence in the presence of a uniform contractibility function. Fix $n\geq 4$; if closed $n$-dimensional topological manifolds $X_i$, all sharing one contractibility function, converge to a compact space $X$, and $X$ happens to be an absolute neighborhood retract (ANR), then for every sufficiently large $i$ the limit $X$ is a cell-like image of $X_i$ — that is, $X$ is obtained from $X_i$ by crushing contractible-looking sets to points, and the crushing map can be chosen open. This settles, in the finite-dimensional ANR setting, a 1991 conjecture about the structure of such limits. The theorem yields exact characterizations of which metric spaces can be approximated by PL or Riemannian manifolds with a uniform contractibility function, including a cohomological obstruction in $H^4(X;\mathbb{Z}_2)$ and applications to Alexandrov spaces, Wasserstein spaces, and exotic spheres.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object of the first proof is the interleaving, or alternating trick: take a resolution of the limit $X$ by a manifold $M$, use the mapping-cylinder metrization of a cell-like map to give $M$ metrics so that it also converges to $X$ with a contractibility function, and weave the two sequences into one sequence $\{Z_i\}$ sharing a single contractibility function. A cell-like map is one whose point preimages are null-homotopic in every neighborhood — roughly, it crushes compact contractible-looking sets to points. The stability theorem for sequences with a uniform contractibility function then forces $Z_i$ to be homeomorphic to $Z_j$ for all large $i,j$, so each $X_i$ is eventually homeomorphic to $M$ and $X$ is a cell-like image of $X_i$. The second proof replaces this with a direct controlled-topology construction: epsilon-homotopy equivalences from the approximating manifolds to $X$, the $\alpha$-approximation theorem to lift them to homeomorphisms after crossing with $S^1\times S^1$, the thin h-cobordism theorem to delete the torus factors, and a diagonal subsequence argument in the style of controlled surgery to produce a limiting cell-like resolution.

What would settle it

The theorem predicts that every such sequence is eventually homeomorphic: there exists $N$ such that all $X_i$ with $i\geq N$ are homeomorphic. A single explicit counterexample — a Gromov–Hausdorff-convergent sequence of closed topological $n$-manifolds with a uniform contractibility function and an ANR limit whose terms are not eventually all homeomorphic — would settle the claim, so the test is to construct or rule out such a sequence, beginning with $n=4$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is Theorem A: fix $n\geq 4$ and let $\{X_i^n\}$ be a sequence of closed metric topological $n$-manifolds with a uniform contractibility function converging in the Gromov–Hausdorff sense to a compact space $X$. If $X$ is an ANR, then for all sufficiently large $i$ the space $X$ is a cell-like image of $X_i$, and the cell-like map can be chosen open. Every such limit was already known to be a resolvable homology manifold; the new content is that the resolving manifold can be taken to be the approximating manifolds themselves, not merely some abstract manifold, and that this holds with no curvature assumption beyond the contractibility function.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the stability theorem's guarantee that two sequences of manifolds that share a contractibility function and both get arbitrarily close to the same limit in the Gromov–Hausdorff sense must be homeomorphic for all large indices; the first proof collapses if that guarantee fails for merely topological manifolds or in dimension 4.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For $n\geq 4$, a compact $n$-dimensional metric space is a Gromov–Hausdorff limit of closed PL $n$-manifolds with a uniform contractibility function if and only if it is a cell-like image of such a manifold.
  • For $n\geq 5$ resolvable ANR homology manifolds, there is a well-defined class $\Delta(X)$ in $H^4(X;\mathbb{Z}_2)$ — the PL-smoothing obstruction of the unique resolution — that vanishes exactly when $X$ admits approximation by PL $n$-manifolds with a uniform contractibility function.
  • For compact geodesic spaces of dimension $n\geq 5$, being a Gromov–Hausdorff limit of closed Riemannian $n$-manifolds with a uniform contractibility function is equivalent to being resolvable by a smooth manifold and also equivalent to having $X\times \mathbb{R}^k$ smoothable for some $k\geq 2$.
  • Manifolds lying close to the boundary of the class of $n$-manifolds with a fixed uniform contractibility function are eventually cell-like-related over the limit space itself, a refinement of earlier results that holds for $n\geq 4$.
  • The diffeomorphism stability conjecture fails if the lower curvature bound is replaced by a uniform contractibility function: exotic spheres can converge, with such a function, to the standard sphere, so the tail is homeomorphic but not diffeomorphic.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The alternating trick uses only the existence of a resolution, metric closeness, and a shared contractibility function, so the same interleaving should apply to any class of spaces with a reliable resolution theory; a testable next step is to run it for sequences of Alexandrov spaces rather than manifolds.
  • Computing the PL-smoothing obstruction $\Delta(X)$ of the resolution gives a concrete way to decide, from purely topological data, whether a geodesic metric space is a Riemannian Gromov–Hausdorff limit with uniform contractibility; the paper leaves such computations for explicit examples open.
  • The failure of diffeomorphism stability under a uniform contractibility function suggests that smooth structures are not invariant under Gromov–Hausdorff closeness in this setting, so any stability theorem that preserves smooth structure must use curvature bounds rather than contractibility bounds alone.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proves Theorem A: if {X_i^n} is a sequence of closed metric topological n-manifolds (n ≥ 4) with a uniform contractibility function converging in the Gromov–Hausdorff sense to a space X that is an ANR, then for all sufficiently large i, X is a cell-like image of X_i, and the cell-like map can be chosen open. Two proofs are offered: a short proof using an interleaving argument and the Grove–Petersen–Wu stability theorem, and a longer proof using the α-approximation theorem and controlled surgery. The paper derives several corollaries, including a proof of Moore's conjecture for finite-dimensional ANR limits, characterizations of Gromov–Hausdorff limits of PL and Riemannian manifolds, a Quinn-obstruction criterion, and applications to Alexandrov spaces, Wasserstein spaces, and diffeomorphism stability.

Significance. If the main theorem and corollaries are correct, the paper would unify and extend known results on resolutions of Gromov–Hausdorff limits, giving a short proof of Moore's conjecture in the finite-dimensional ANR setting and connecting Quinn's resolution obstruction to metric approximation. The paper is clearly written, contains useful background, and the mapping-cylinder lemma (Lemma 2.33) is a nice tool. However, the central proof relies on hypotheses that are not verified and, in one place, appears to apply the α-approximation theorem to a codomain that is not known to be a manifold. Because these gaps are load-bearing for Theorem A, the claims as stated are not established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3, first proof] The proof begins 'By [52], X is a resolvable homology manifold.' This is the paper's Theorem 2.40, which requires the Gromov–Hausdorff limit X to be finite-dimensional. Theorem A only assumes X is an ANR, and a compact metric ANR need not be finite-dimensional (for example, the Hilbert cube). Example 2.37 even shows that infinite-dimensional limits of n-manifolds with a uniform contractibility function exist. The proof does not establish finite-dimensionality of X, so the existence of the resolution M and the subsequent application of the Grove–Petersen–Wu stability theorem are not justified. If the intended stability theorem has weaker hypotheses, it needs to be stated precisely and its hypotheses verified.
  2. [Section 3, second proof] The step 'By the α-approximation theorem, ... each (f_i, id, id) : X_i × S^1 × S^1 → X × S^1 × S^1 is ε-close to a homeomorphism F_i' is not supported by the stated Chapman–Ferry theorem (Theorem 2.22), which requires both domain and codomain to be closed metric n-manifolds. At this point X × S^1 × S^1 is not known to be a manifold; indeed, showing that X is resolvable (equivalently, that X × R^2 is a manifold, by Quinn's Theorem 2.13) is part of what the proof aims to achieve. This appears circular. The proof should either first establish that X × S^1 × S^1 is a manifold by a separate argument, or replace the target by a resolution M of X with a clear explanation of why that replacement is legitimate for the later diagram.
  3. [Section 3, second proof] The passage 'Repeating the argument ... we can remove the last circle factor ... and obtain a homeomorphism ĥ_1 : X_i → X_j' delegates a nontrivial step to references [93, 51, 52]. Since the desired conclusion is a homeomorphism between the original manifolds X_i and X_j, not between their products with S^1, this step must be stated and proved or the relevant lemma from the references should be quoted in sufficient detail. This is especially important in dimension n = 4, where product-structure phenomena differ from higher dimensions.
  4. [Section 3, first proof, final sentence] The assertion that the cell-like map can be taken to be open is attributed to Walsh [92] without stating the applicable theorem or checking its hypotheses. Because openness is an explicit part of Theorem A, the relevant result from Walsh's paper should be quoted and its conditions (such as dimension and ANR hypotheses) verified.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Theorem A] The abstract emphasizes 'finite-dimensional Gromov–Hausdorff limits,' but Theorem A states only that X is an ANR. If the finite-dimensional hypothesis is in fact needed for the proof, the theorem statement and all dependent statements should be aligned with the abstract.
  2. [Definition 2.1] In the definition of ANR, 'M is a retract of some open subset U of Z' should specify that U contains M (i.e., U is an open neighborhood of M), which is the standard definition.
  3. [Section 3, second proof] The notation h_i : X_{η_i} → X_{η_{i+1}} is slightly confusing because h_i is indexed by the subsequence index rather than by the original sequence index; a different indexing notation would improve readability.
  4. [Acknowledgements] The name 'Philipp Reiser' is spelled 'Phillip Reiser' in the acknowledgements; the spelling should be made consistent.
  5. [Example 5.2] The statement 'This example is true in all dimensions' is vague; it would be clearer to specify which assertions in the example are meant.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Theorem A is an application of external theorems (Grove-Petersen-Wu, Quinn, Chapman-Ferry); the only self-citation is a minor, non-load-bearing use in an example.

full rationale

I walked the derivation chain of Theorem A and the corollaries. The first proof of Theorem A begins with 'By [52], X is a resolvable homology manifold' and then builds an interleaved sequence {Z_i} from the approximating manifolds X_i and the resolution M_i, concluding via the 'Grove-Petersen-Wu stability theorem [51, 52]' that Z_i is homeomorphic to Z_j for large i, j. This is an invocation of substantial external theorems (Grove-Petersen-Wu, Quinn, Chapman-Ferry, Moore), not a reduction of the target result to itself. The interleaving construction does not define Z_i as homeomorphic to Z_j; the homeomorphism conclusion is an external stability result. The second proof likewise follows the proof structure of [52] combined with controlled surgery from [14], again external. The skeptical concern that Theorem 2.40 requires finite dimensionality of the limit while Theorem A assumes only that X is an ANR is a missing-hypothesis or citation-precision issue, not a circular step: the paper does not derive the needed stability from its own conclusion. The only self-citation is [1], used in Example 5.2: 'The converse follows from the results in [1].' That self-citation supports an illustrative application involving Wasserstein spaces, not the main theorem or any of Corollaries B-F, so it is not load-bearing. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no ansatz is smuggled in via a self-citation, and no known result is merely renamed. I therefore find no circular derivation chain; the low score reflects only the single minor self-citation in a non-central example.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 10 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data. The paper introduces no new objects beyond the cohomology class Delta(X), which is defined as the Kirby-Siebenmann invariant of a resolution and is standard. All other background assumptions are established theorems from controlled topology, decomposition space theory, and geometric topology.

assumptions (10)
  • standard math Grove-Petersen-Wu: a finite-dimensional GH limit of closed n-manifolds with a uniform contractibility function is a resolvable homology manifold.
    Invoked at the start of the first proof of Theorem A to obtain a resolution M → X.
  • standard math Grove-Petersen-Wu stability theorem: sufficiently GH-close closed n-manifolds with a uniform contractibility function are homeomorphic.
    Used in the first proof of Theorem A to show the interleaved sequence {Z_i} is eventually homeomorphic.
  • standard math Quinn's uniqueness of resolutions: any two resolutions of a compact metric space of dimension at least 4 are homeomorphic up to small controlled error.
    Used to define the obstruction Delta(X) in Corollary D and to obtain homeomorphisms in Corollary F.
  • standard math Chapman-Ferry alpha-approximation theorem, including the 4-dimensional refinements of Au and Ferry-Weinberger.
    Used in the second proof of Theorem A and in Example 5.1.
  • standard math Moore's theorem that a cell-like image of a closed n-manifold is the endpoint of a continuous path of manifolds in LGC(n, rho), with the metric-extension refinement.
    Used to construct the sequence (M, d_i) converging to X in the first proof of Theorem A.
  • standard math Quinn's resolution theorem: X is resolvable if and only if X × R^2 is a manifold.
    Used in Corollary E and to justify applying alpha-approximation to X × S^1 × S^1.
  • standard math Product Structure Theorem and the Kirby-Siebenmann invariant.
    Used in Corollaries D and E to convert smoothability and PL-structure assertions.
  • standard math Siebenmann's theorem that cell-like maps between manifolds of dimension at least 5 are approximable by homeomorphisms, and Edwards's theorem for targets with the disjoint disk property.
    Used in Corollary E and in the examples.
  • standard math Walsh's theorem that the resolving cell-like map can be chosen open.
    Cited in the final sentence of the first proof of Theorem A to justify the openness assertion.
  • standard math Compact ANRs are finite-dimensional.
    Used implicitly so that the Grove-Petersen-Wu theorem, which requires finite-dimensional limit, applies to the ANR limit X.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Regularity of Resolutions and Limits of Manifolds with a Uniform Contractibility Function." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FZBKQ6EK

@misc{pith2026250717557,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Regularity of Resolutions and Limits of Manifolds with a Uniform Contractibility Function},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FZBKQ6EK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.17557}
}
abstract

In this paper, we give a short and self-contained proof to a 1991 conjecture by Moore concerning the structure of certain finite-dimensional Gromov--Hausdorff limits, in the ANR setting. As a consequence, one easily characterizes finite dimensional limits of PL-able or Riemannian $n$-manifolds with a uniform contractibility function. For example, one can define for any compact connected metric space that is a resolvable ANR homology manifold of covering dimension at least 5, an obstruction, which vanishes if and only if the homology manifold can be approximated in the Gromov--Hausdorff sense by PL-manifolds of the same dimension and with a uniform contractibility function. Further, it provides short proofs to certain well known results by reducing them to problems in Bing topology. We also give another proof using more classical arguments that yield more structural information. We give several applications to the theory of homology manifolds, Alexandrov spaces, Wasserstein spaces and a generalized form of the diffeomorphism stability conjecture.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [52]

    Geometric finiteness theorems via controlled topology

    Karsten Grove, Peter Petersen V, and Jyh Yang Wu. “Geometric finiteness theorems via controlled topology”. In:Invent. Math. 99.1 (1990), pp. 205–213.issn: 0020-9910. doi: 10.1007/BF01234418. url: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01234418

    doi:10.1007/bf01234418 1990

  2. [92]

    Isotoping mappings to open mappings

    John J. Walsh. “Isotoping mappings to open mappings”. In:Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 250 (1979), pp. 121–145.issn: 0002-9947.doi: 10.2307/1998981. url: https://doi. org/10.2307/1998981

    work page doi:10.2307/1998981 1979

  3. [1]

    Stability and finiteness theorems for Wasserstein spaces

    Mohammad Alattar. “Stability and finiteness theorems for Wasserstein spaces”. In: Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.153.3 (2025), pp. 1283–1298.issn: 0002-9939.doi: 10.1090/ proc/17084. url: https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/17084

    work page doi:10.1090/proc/17084 2025

  4. [2]

    A. D. Aleksandrov.Vnutrennyaya Geometriya Vypuklyh Poverhnosteı. OGIZ, Moscow- Leningrad, 1948, p. 387

    1948

  5. [3]

    A. D. Aleksandrov and V. A. Zalgaller.Intrinsic geometry of surfaces. Translations of Mathematical Monographs, Vol. 15. Translated from the Russian by J. M. Danskin. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1967, pp. vi+327

    1967

  6. [5]

    Cellular decompositions of3-manifolds that yield3-manifolds

    Steve Armentrout. Cellular decompositions of3-manifolds that yield3-manifolds. Mem- oirs of the American Mathematical Society, No. 107. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1971, p. 72. url: http : / / links . jstor . org / sici ? sici = 0002 - 9890(196503)72:3%3C334:ITGT%3E2.0.CO;2-N&origin=MSN

    1971

  7. [6]

    Approximating varepsilon-homotopy equivalences by homeo- morphisms on 4-manifolds

    Thomas Kwok-keung Au. Approximating varepsilon-homotopy equivalences by homeo- morphisms on 4-manifolds. Thesis (Ph.D.)–University of California, San Diego. Pro- Quest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 1990, p. 72. url: http : / / gateway . proquest . com / openurl ? url _ ver = Z39 . 88 - 2004 & rft _ val _ fmt = info : ofi / fmt : kev : mtx : dissertation&res_dat=xri...

    1990

  8. [7]

    The disc embedding theorem

    Stefan Behrens, Boldizsár Kalmár, Min Hoon Kim, Mark Powell, and Arunima Ray, eds. The disc embedding theorem. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2021, pp. xvii+473. isbn: 978-0-19-884131-9

    2021

Show all 95 references
  1. [8]

    A convex metric for a locally connected continuum

    R. H. Bing. “A convex metric for a locally connected continuum”. In:Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.55 (1949), pp. 812–819.issn: 0002-9904.doi: 10.1090/S0002-9904-1949-09298-

    1949 doi

  2. [9]

    url: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9904-1949-09298-4

    1949 doi

  3. [10]

    Partitioning continuous curves

    R. H. Bing. “Partitioning continuous curves”. In: Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 58 (1952), pp. 536–556.issn: 0002-9904.doi: 10.1090/S0002-9904-1952-09621-X. url: https: //doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9904-1952-09621-X

    1952 doi

  4. [11]

    Quasisymmetric parametrizations of two-dimensional metric spheres

    Mario Bonk and Bruce Kleiner. “Quasisymmetric parametrizations of two-dimensional metric spheres”. In: Invent. Math. 150.1 (2002), pp. 127–183. issn: 0020-9910. doi: 10.1007/s00222-002-0233-z . url: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-002-0233- z

    2002 doi

  5. [12]

    Theory of retracts

    Karol Borsuk. Theory of retracts. Monografie Matematyczne [Mathematical Mono- graphs], Tom 44. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warsaw, 1967, p. 251

    1967

  6. [13]

    Elia Bruè, Alessandro Pigati, and Daniele Semola.Topological regularity and stability of noncollapsed spaces with Ricci curvature bounded below. 2024. arXiv:2405.03839

    2024 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Erratum: “Topology of homology manifolds

    J. Bryant, S. Ferry, W. Mio, and S. Weinberger. “Erratum: “Topology of homology manifolds””. In: Ann. of Math. (2)200.2 (2024), pp. 799–801.issn: 0003-486X. doi: 10.4007/annals.2024.200.2.8 . url: https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2024. 200.2.8

    2024 doi

  8. [15]

    Topology of homology manifolds

    J. Bryant, S. Ferry, W. Mio, and S. Weinberger. “Topology of homology manifolds”. In: Ann. of Math. (2)143.3 (1996), pp. 435–467.issn: 0003-486X.doi: 10.2307/2118532. url: https://doi.org/10.2307/2118532

    1996 doi

  9. [16]

    Resolving zero-dimensional singularities in generalized man- ifolds

    J. Bryant and Lacher. “Resolving zero-dimensional singularities in generalized man- ifolds”. In: Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 83.3 (1978), pp. 403–413. url: https : / / www . cambridge . org / core / journals / mathematical - proceedings - of...

    1978

  10. [17]

    The structure of generalized manifolds having nonmanifold set of trivial dimension

    J. W. Cannon, J. L. Bryant, and R. C. Lacher. “The structure of generalized manifolds having nonmanifold set of trivial dimension”. In:Geometric topology (Proc. Georgia Topology Conf., Athens, Ga., 1977). Academic Press, New York-London, 1979, pp. 261– 300

    1977

  11. [18]

    Approximating compact inner metric spaces by surfaces

    Mark Cassorla. “Approximating compact inner metric spaces by surfaces”. In:Indiana Univ. Math. J.41.2 (1992), pp. 505–513.issn: 0022-2518.doi: 10.1512/iumj.1992. 41.41029. url: https://doi.org/10.1512/iumj.1992.41.41029. 18 REFERENCES

    1992 doi

  12. [19]

    Existence and uniqueness of optimal transport maps

    Fabio Cavalletti and Martin Huesmann. “Existence and uniqueness of optimal transport maps”. In: Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré C Anal. Non Linéaire32.6 (2015), pp. 1367–1377. issn: 0294-1449.doi: 10.1016/j.anihpc.2014.09.006. url: https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.anihpc.2014.09.006

    2015 doi

  13. [20]

    EMS Series of Lectures in Mathematics

    Alberto Cavicchioli, Friedrich Hegenbarth, and Dušan Repovš.Higher-dimensional gen- eralized manifolds: surgery and constructions. EMS Series of Lectures in Mathematics. European Mathematical Society (EMS), Zürich, 2016, pp. vi+146.isbn: 978-3-03719- 156-9. doi: 10.4171/156. u...

    2016 doi

  14. [21]

    Controlled boundary and h-cobordism theorems

    T. A. Chapman. “Controlled boundary and h-cobordism theorems”. In:Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 280.1 (1983), pp. 73–95. issn: 0002-9947. doi: 10 . 2307 / 1999603. url: https://doi.org/10.2307/1999603

    1983 doi

  15. [22]

    Approximating homotopy equivalences by home- omorphisms

    T. A. Chapman and Steve Ferry. “Approximating homotopy equivalences by home- omorphisms”. In: Amer. J. Math. 101.3 (1979), pp. 583–607. issn: 0002-9327. doi: 10.2307/2373799. url: https://doi.org/10.2307/2373799

    1979 doi

  16. [23]

    On the structure of spaces with Ricci curvature bounded below. I

    Jeff Cheeger and Tobias H. Colding. “On the structure of spaces with Ricci curvature bounded below. I”. In:J. Differential Geom.46.3 (1997), pp. 406–480.issn: 0022-040X. url: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.jdg/1214459974

    1997

  17. [25]

    On the structure of spaces with Ricci curvature bounded below. III

    Jeff Cheeger and Tobias H. Colding. “On the structure of spaces with Ricci curvature bounded below. III”. In:J. Differential Geom.54.1 (2000), pp. 37–74.issn: 0022-040X. url: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.jdg/1214342146

    2000

  18. [26]

    Applications of Surgery Theory to Geometry.Thesis(Ph.D.)–University of Florida

    MichelleDaher. Applications of Surgery Theory to Geometry.Thesis(Ph.D.)–University of Florida. ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 2021, p. 3.isbn: 979-8380-21060-7. url: http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88- 2004&rft_val_fmt= info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=x...

    2021

  19. [27]

    Detecting the disjoint disks property

    Robert J. Daverman. “Detecting the disjoint disks property”. In:Pacific J. Math.93.2 (1981), pp. 277–298.issn: 0030-8730.url: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.pjm/ 1102736260

    1981

  20. [28]

    A ghastly generalizedn-manifold

    Robert J. Daverman and John J. Walsh. “A ghastly generalizedn-manifold”. In:Illinois J. Math.25.4 (1981), pp. 555–576.issn: 0019-2082

    1981

  21. [30]

    The orientation of Yang-Mills moduli spaces and4-manifold topol- ogy

    S. K. Donaldson. “The orientation of Yang-Mills moduli spaces and4-manifold topol- ogy”. In:J. Differential Geom.26.3 (1987), pp. 397–428.issn: 0022-040X.url: http: //projecteuclid.org/euclid.jdg/1214441485

    1987

  22. [31]

    Convergence of Riemannian 2-manifolds under a uniform curvature and contractibility bound

    Tobias Dott. Convergence of Riemannian 2-manifolds under a uniform curvature and contractibility bound. 2025. arXiv:2501.06351 [math.MG]. url: https://arxiv.org/ abs/2501.06351

    2025 arXiv

  23. [32]

    Gromov-Hausdorfflimitsofclosedsurfaces

    TobiasDott.“Gromov-Hausdorfflimitsofclosedsurfaces”.In: Anal. Geom. Metr. Spaces 12.1 (2024), Paper No. 20240003, 16.doi: 10.1515/agms- 2024- 0003 . url: https: //doi.org/10.1515/agms-2024-0003. REFERENCES 19

    2024 doi

  24. [33]

    On the Gromov-Hausdorff limits of compact surfaces with boundary

    Tobias Dott. “On the Gromov-Hausdorff limits of compact surfaces with boundary”. In: Ann. Global Anal. Geom.66.3 (2024), Paper No.15, 24.issn: 0232-704X.doi: 10. 1007/s10455-024-09973-w. url: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10455-024-09973-w

    2024 doi

  25. [34]

    Homological dimension theory

    A. N. Dranishnikov. “Homological dimension theory”. In:Uspekhi Mat. Nauk43.4(262) (1988), pp. 11–55, 255. issn: 0042-1316. doi: 10 . 1070 / RM1988v043n04ABEH001900. url: https://doi.org/10.1070/RM1988v043n04ABEH001900

    1988 doi

  26. [35]

    OnaproblemofP.S.Aleksandrov

    A.N.Dranishnikov.“OnaproblemofP.S.Aleksandrov”.In: Mat. Sb. (N.S.)135(177).4 (1988), pp. 551–557, 560.issn: 0368-8666.doi: 10.1070/SM1989v063n02ABEH003290. url: https://doi.org/10.1070/SM1989v063n02ABEH003290

    1988 doi

  27. [36]

    An infinite- dimensional phenomenon in finite-dimensional metric topology

    Alexander N. Dranishnikov, Steven C. Ferry, and Shmuel Weinberger. “An infinite- dimensional phenomenon in finite-dimensional metric topology”. In:Camb. J. Math. 8.1 (2020), pp. 95–147.issn: 2168-0930. doi: 10 . 4310 / cjm . 2020 . v8 . n1 . a2. url: https://doi.org/10.4310/cj...

    2020 doi

  28. [37]

    Infinite-dimensional compacta having cohomological dimension two: an application of the Sullivan conjecture

    Jerzy Dydak and John J. Walsh. “Infinite-dimensional compacta having cohomological dimension two: an application of the Sullivan conjecture”. In:Topology 32.1 (1993), pp. 93–104. issn: 0040-9383. doi: 10 . 1016 / 0040 - 9383(93 ) 90040 - 3. url: https : //doi.org/10.1016/0040-...

    1993 doi

  29. [38]

    The topology of manifolds and cell-like maps

    Robert D. Edwards. “The topology of manifolds and cell-like maps”. In:Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians (Helsinki, 1978). Acad. Sci. Fennica, Helsinki, 1980, pp. 111–127

    1978

  30. [39]

    Thesis (Ph.D.)– State University of New York at Binghamton

    Teresa Lynn Engel.Deformation and rigidity along paths of manifolds. Thesis (Ph.D.)– State University of New York at Binghamton. ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 1991, p. 125.url: http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_ val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertatio...

    1991

  31. [40]

    Limits of polyhedra in Gromov-Hausdorff space

    Steven C. Ferry. “Limits of polyhedra in Gromov-Hausdorff space”. In:Topology 37.6 (1998), pp. 1325–1338.issn: 0040-9383.doi: 10.1016/S0040-9383(98)00080-9. url: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-9383(98)00080-9

    1998 doi

  32. [41]

    Topological finiteness theorems for manifolds in Gromov-Hausdorff space

    Steven C. Ferry. “Topological finiteness theorems for manifolds in Gromov-Hausdorff space”. In: Duke Math. J. 74.1 (1994), pp. 95–106. issn: 0012-7094. doi: 10 . 1215 / S0012-7094-94-07404-8 . url: https://doi.org/10.1215/S0012-7094-94-07404- 8

    1994 doi

  33. [42]

    Approximating topological metrics by Riemannian metrics

    Steven C. Ferry and Boris L. Okun. “Approximating topological metrics by Riemannian metrics”. In:Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.123.6 (1995), pp. 1865–1872.issn: 0002-9939.doi: 10.2307/2161004. url: https://doi.org/10.2307/2161004

    1995 doi

  34. [43]

    Curvature, tangentiality, and controlled topology

    Steven C. Ferry and Shmuel Weinberger. “Curvature, tangentiality, and controlled topology”. In:Invent. Math.105.2 (1991), pp. 401–414.issn: 0020-9910.doi: 10.1007/ BF01232272. url: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01232272

    1991 doi

  35. [44]

    Freedman and Frank Quinn

    Michael H. Freedman and Frank Quinn. Topology of 4-manifolds. Vol. 39. Princeton Mathematical Series. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1990, pp. viii+259. isbn: 0-691-08577-3

    1990

  36. [45]

    The topology of four-dimensional manifolds

    Michael Hartley Freedman. “The topology of four-dimensional manifolds”. In: J. Differential Geometry 17.3 (1982), pp. 357–453. issn: 0022-040X. url: http : //projecteuclid.org/euclid.jdg/1214437136. 20 REFERENCES

    1982

  37. [46]

    Stefan Friedl, Matthias Nagel, Patrick Orson, and Mark Powell.A survey of the foun- dations of four-manifold theory in the topological category. 2024. arXiv: 1910.07372 [math.GT]. url: https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.07372

    2024 arXiv

  38. [47]

    Alexandrov spaces are CS sets

    Tadashi Fujioka. Alexandrov spaces are CS sets. 2024. arXiv:2404.14587 [math.DG]

    2024 arXiv

  39. [48]

    Tadashi Fujioka and Shijie Gu.Topological regularity of Busemann spaces of nonpositive curvature. 2025. arXiv:2504.14455 [math.DG]. url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504. 14455

    2025 arXiv

  40. [49]

    On quo- tients of spaces with Ricci curvature bounded below

    Fernando Galaz-García, Martin Kell, Andrea Mondino, and Gerardo Sosa. “On quo- tients of spaces with Ricci curvature bounded below”. In:J. Funct. Anal.275.6 (2018), pp. 1368–1446. issn: 0022-1236. doi: 10 . 1016 / j . jfa . 2018 . 06 . 002. url: https : //doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa...

    2018 doi

  41. [50]

    Cohomogeneity one Alexandrov spaces in low dimensions

    Fernando Galaz-García and Masoumeh Zarei. “Cohomogeneity one Alexandrov spaces in low dimensions”. In:Ann. Global Anal. Geom.58.2 (2020), pp. 109–146.issn: 0232- 704X.doi: 10.1007/s10455-020-09716-7.url: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10455- 020-09716-7

    2020 doi

  42. [51]

    Notes on the Cheeger and Colding version of the Reifenberg theorem for metric spaces

    Nicola Gigli and Ivan Yuri Violo. “Notes on the Cheeger and Colding version of the Reifenberg theorem for metric spaces”. In:Boll. Unione Mat. Ital.18.1 (2025), pp. 217–

    2025

  43. [53]

    Erratum: “Geometric finiteness theorems via controlled topology

    Karsten Grove, Peter Petersen V, and Jyh Yang Wu. “Erratum: “Geometric finiteness theorems via controlled topology” [Invent. Math.99 (1990), no. 1, 205–213; MR1029396 (90k:53075)]”. In: Invent. Math. 104.1 (1991), pp. 221–222.issn: 0020-9910.doi: 10. 1007/BF01245073. url: http...

    1990 doi

  44. [54]

    The relationship of generalized manifolds to Poincaré duality complexes and topological manifolds

    Friedrich Hegenbarth and Dušan Repovš. “The relationship of generalized manifolds to Poincaré duality complexes and topological manifolds”. In:Topology Appl.239 (2018), pp. 126–141. issn: 0166-8641. doi: 10 .1016 / j. topol .2018 . 02. 024. url: https : //doi.org/10.1016/j.top...

    2018 doi

  45. [55]

    MetricconstraintsonexoticspheresviaAlexan- drov geometry

    KarstenGroveandFrederickWilhelm.“MetricconstraintsonexoticspheresviaAlexan- drov geometry”. In:J. Reine Angew. Math.487 (1997), pp. 201–217.issn: 0075-4102

    1997

  46. [56]

    Cell-like mappings between CS sets

    James P. Henderson. “Cell-like mappings between CS sets”. In: Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 90.3 (1984), pp. 445–449.issn: 0002-9939.doi: 10.2307/2044491. url: https: //doi.org/10.2307/2044491

    1984 doi

  47. [57]

    Limits of manifolds in the Gromov- Hausdorff metric space

    Friedrich Hegenbarth and Dušan D. Repovš. “Limits of manifolds in the Gromov- Hausdorff metric space”. In:Mediterr. J. Math.20.1 (2023), Paper No. 47, 11.issn: 1660-5446. doi: 10.1007/s00009-022-02250-9 . url: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00009-022-02250-9

    2023 doi

  48. [58]

    Regularity of limits of noncollapsing sequences of manifolds

    V. Kapovitch. “Regularity of limits of noncollapsing sequences of manifolds”. In:Geom. Funct. Anal.12.1 (2002), pp. 121–137.issn: 1016-443X.doi: 10.1007/s00039-002- 8240-1. url: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00039-002-8240-1. REFERENCES 21

    2002 doi

  49. [60]

    A characterization of LCn compacta in terms of Gromov- Hausdorff convergence

    Kazuhiro Kawamura. “A characterization of LCn compacta in terms of Gromov- Hausdorff convergence”. In: Canad. Math. Bull. 37.4 (1994), pp. 505–513. issn: 0008-4395. doi: 10.4153/CMB-1994-073-9 . url: https://doi.org/10.4153/CMB- 1994-073-9

    1994 doi

  50. [61]

    Restrictions on collapsing with a lower sectional curvature bound

    Vitali Kapovitch. “Restrictions on collapsing with a lower sectional curvature bound”. In: Math. Z.249.3 (2005), pp. 519–539.issn: 0025-5874.doi: 10.1007/s00209-004- 0715-3. url: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00209-004-0715-3

    2005 doi

  51. [62]

    Kirby and Laurence C

    Robion C. Kirby and Laurence C. Siebenmann.Foundational essays on topological man- ifolds, smoothings, and triangulations. Annals of Mathematics Studies, No. 88. With notes by John Milnor and Michael Atiyah. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ; University of Tokyo Press,...

    1977

  52. [63]

    Transport maps, non-branching sets of geodesics and measure rigidity

    Martin Kell. “Transport maps, non-branching sets of geodesics and measure rigidity”. In: Adv. Math.320 (2017), pp. 520–573.issn: 0001-8708.doi: 10.1016/j.aim.2017. 09.003. url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2017.09.003

    2017 doi

  53. [64]

    Cell-like mappings. I

    R. C. Lacher. “Cell-like mappings. I”. In:Pacific J. Math.30 (1969), pp. 717–731.issn: 0030-8730. url: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.pjm/1102978255

    1969

  54. [65]

    On the local structure and the homology ofCAT(κ) spaces and Eu- clidean buildings

    Linus Kramer. “On the local structure and the homology ofCAT(κ) spaces and Eu- clidean buildings”. In: Adv. Geom. 11.2 (2011), pp. 347–369. issn: 1615-715X. doi: 10.1515/ADVGEOM.2010.049. url: https://doi.org/10.1515/ADVGEOM.2010.049

    2011 doi

  55. [66]

    Ricci curvature for metric-measure spaces via optimal transport

    John Lott and Cédric Villani. “Ricci curvature for metric-measure spaces via optimal transport”. In: Ann. of Math. (2) 169.3 (2009), pp. 903–991. issn: 0003-486X. doi: 10.4007/annals.2009.169.903 . url: https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2009. 169.903

    2009 doi

  56. [67]

    Cell-like mappings. II

    R. C. Lacher. “Cell-like mappings. II”. In:Pacific J. Math.35 (1970), pp. 649–660.issn: 0030-8730. url: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.pjm/1102971481

    1970

  57. [68]

    CAT(0) 4–manifolds are Euclidean

    Alexander Lytchak, Koichi Nagano, and Stephan Stadler. “CAT(0) 4–manifolds are Euclidean”. In: Geom. Topol.28.7 (2024), pp. 3285–3308.issn: 1465-3060. doi: 10 . 2140/gt.2024.28.3285. url: https://doi.org/10.2140/gt.2024.28.3285

    2024 doi

  58. [69]

    Topological regularity of spaces with an upper curvature bound

    Alexander Lytchak and Koichi Nagano. “Topological regularity of spaces with an upper curvature bound”. In:J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS)24.1 (2022), pp. 137–165.issn: 1435-

    2022

  59. [70]

    Noncollapsing examples with positive Ricci curvature and infinite topo- logical type

    X. Menguy. “Noncollapsing examples with positive Ricci curvature and infinite topo- logical type”. In:Geom. Funct. Anal.10.3 (2000), pp. 600–627.issn: 1016-443X.doi: 10.1007/PL00001632. url: https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00001632

    2000 doi

  60. [71]

    Differential topology forty-six years later

    John Milnor. “Differential topology forty-six years later”. In:Notices Amer. Math. Soc. 58.6 (2011), pp. 804–809.issn: 0002-9920

    2011

  61. [72]

    Canonical parameterizations of metric disks

    Alexander Lytchak and Stefan Wenger. “Canonical parameterizations of metric disks”. In: Duke Math. J.169.4 (2020), pp. 761–797.issn: 0012-7094.doi: 10.1215/00127094- 2019-0065. url: https://doi.org/10.1215/00127094-2019-0065

    2020 doi

  62. [73]

    Bounded curvature closure of the set of compact Riemannian mani- folds

    I. G. Nikolaev. “Bounded curvature closure of the set of compact Riemannian mani- folds”. In: Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.)24.1 (1991), pp. 171–177.issn: 0273-0979. doi: 10.1090/S0273-0979-1991-15980-X . url: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0273- 0979-1991-15980-X. 22 REFERENCES

    1991 doi

  63. [74]

    Parallel translation and smoothness of the metric of spaces with bounded curvature

    I. G. Nikolaev. “Parallel translation and smoothness of the metric of spaces with bounded curvature”. In: Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 250.5 (1980), pp. 1056–1058. issn: 0002-3264

    1980

  64. [75]

    Gromov-Hausdorff convergence to nonmanifolds

    Teresa Engel Moore. “Gromov-Hausdorff convergence to nonmanifolds”. In:J. Geom. Anal.5.3(1995),pp.411–418. issn:1050-6926. doi: 10.1007/BF02921804.url: https: //doi.org/10.1007/BF02921804

    1995 doi

  65. [76]

    Alexandrov spaces with curvatures bounded from below II

    Grigori Perelman. “Alexandrov spaces with curvatures bounded from below II”. In: preprint (1991)

    1991

  66. [77]

    A finiteness theorem for metric spaces

    Peter Petersen V. “A finiteness theorem for metric spaces”. In:J. Differential Geom. 31.2 (1990), pp. 387–395.issn: 0022-040X.url: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid. jdg/1214444319

    1990

  67. [78]

    Cocompact CAT(0) spaces are almost geodesically complete

    Pedro Ontaneda. “Cocompact CAT(0) spaces are almost geodesically complete”. In: Topology 44.1 (2005), pp. 47–62.issn: 0040-9383.doi: 10.1016/j.top.2004.01.010. url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.top.2004.01.010

    2005 doi

  68. [79]

    A controlled-topology proof of the product structure theorem

    Frank Quinn. “A controlled-topology proof of the product structure theorem”. In:Geom. Dedicata148 (2010), pp. 303–308.issn: 0046-5755.doi: 10.1007/s10711-009-9406-x. url: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10711-009-9406-x

    2010 doi

  69. [80]

    An obstruction to the resolution of homology manifolds

    Frank Quinn. “An obstruction to the resolution of homology manifolds”. In:Michigan Math. J. 34.2 (1987), pp. 285–291.issn: 0026-2285. doi: 10.1307/mmj/1029003559 . url: https://doi.org/10.1307/mmj/1029003559

    1987

  70. [81]

    Stability, Finiteness and Dimension Four

    Curtis Pro and Frederick Wilhelm. Stability, Finiteness and Dimension Four. 2020. arXiv: 2006.02450 [math.DG]

    2020 arXiv

  71. [82]

    Ends of maps. III. Dimensions4 and 5

    Frank Quinn. “Ends of maps. III. Dimensions4 and 5”. In:J. Differential Geometry17.3 (1982), pp. 503–521.issn: 0022-040X.url: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.jdg/ 1214437139

    1982

  72. [83]

    Problems on homology manifolds

    Frank Quinn. “Problems on homology manifolds”. In: Exotic homology manifolds— Oberwolfach 2003. Vol. 9. Geom. Topol. Monogr. Geom. Topol. Publ., Coventry, 2006, pp. 87–103. doi: 10.2140/gtm.2006.9.87 . url: https://doi.org/10.2140/gtm. 2006.9.87

    2003 doi

  73. [84]

    Ends of maps. I

    Frank Quinn. “Ends of maps. I”. In:Ann. of Math. (2)110.2 (1979), pp. 275–331.issn: 0003-486X. doi: 10.2307/1971262. url: https://doi.org/10.2307/1971262

    1979 doi

  74. [85]

    Geometric aspects of general topology

    Katsuro Sakai. Geometric aspects of general topology. Springer Monographs in Mathe- matics. Springer, Tokyo, 2013, pp. xvi+521.isbn: 978-4-431-54396-1; 978-4-431-54397-

    2013

  75. [86]

    On isometries of compact Lp-Wasserstein spaces

    Jaime Santos-Rodríguez. “On isometries of compact Lp-Wasserstein spaces”. In:Adv. Math. 409 (2022), Paper No. 108632, 21.issn: 0001-8708,1090-2082.doi: 10.1016/j. aim.2022.108632. url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2022.108632

    2022

  76. [87]

    Examples of tangent cones of non-collapsed Ricci limit spaces

    Philipp Reiser. “Examples of tangent cones of non-collapsed Ricci limit spaces”. In: Nonlinear Anal.252 (2025), Paper No. 113699, 10.issn: 0362-546X.doi: 10.1016/j. na.2024.113699. url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2024.113699

    2025

  77. [88]

    Approximating cellular maps by homeomorphisms

    L. C. Siebenmann. “Approximating cellular maps by homeomorphisms”. In:Topology 11 (1972), pp. 271–294.issn: 0040-9383.doi: 10.1016/0040-9383(72)90014-6. url: https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-9383(72)90014-6. REFERENCES 23

    1972 doi

  78. [89]

    url: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431- 54397-8

    doi: 10.1007/978-4-431-54397-8. url: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431- 54397-8

    doi

  79. [90]

    Topological manifolds

    L. C. Siebenmann. “Topological manifolds”. In: Actes du Congrès International des Mathématiciens (Nice, 1970), Tome 2. Gauthier-Villars Éditeur, Paris, 1971, pp. 133– 163

    1970

  80. [91]

    The Hauptvermutung for C ∞ homeo- morphisms. II. A proof valid for open4-manifolds

    M. G. Scharlemann and L. C. Siebenmann. “The Hauptvermutung for C ∞ homeo- morphisms. II. A proof valid for open4-manifolds”. In: Compositio Math. 29 (1974), pp. 253–264.issn: 0010-437X

    1974

  81. [93]

    Deformation of homeomorphisms on stratified sets. I, II

    L. C. Siebenmann. “Deformation of homeomorphisms on stratified sets. I, II”. In:Com- ment. Math. Helv.47 (1972), 123–136, ibid. 47 (1972), 137–163.issn: 0010-2571.doi: 10.1007/BF02566793. url: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02566793

    1972 doi

  82. [94]

    Topological regularity theorems for Alexandrov spaces

    Jyh-Yang Wu. “Topological regularity theorems for Alexandrov spaces”. In:J. Math. Soc. Japan49.4 (1997), pp. 741–757.issn: 0025-5645.doi: 10.2969/jmsj/04940741. url: https://doi.org/10.2969/jmsj/04940741

    1997

  83. [95]

    A short proof of Hausdorff’s theorem on extending metrics

    H. Toruńczyk. “A short proof of Hausdorff’s theorem on extending metrics”. In:Fund. Math. 77.2 (1972), pp. 191–193.issn: 0016-2736. doi: 10.4064/fm- 77- 2- 191- 193. url: https://doi.org/10.4064/fm-77-2-191-193

    1972 doi

  84. [97]

    On the structure of almost nonnegatively curved manifolds

    Jyh Yang Wu. “On the structure of almost nonnegatively curved manifolds”. In: J. Differential Geom. 35.2 (1992), pp. 385–397. issn: 0022-040X. url: http : //projecteuclid.org/euclid.jdg/1214448080

    1992

  85. [99]

    A finiteness theorem for Ricci curvature in dimension three

    Shun-Hui Zhu. “A finiteness theorem for Ricci curvature in dimension three”. In: J. Differential Geom. 37.3 (1993), pp. 711–727. issn: 0022-040X. url: http : //projecteuclid.org/euclid.jdg/1214453906. (Alattar) Department of Mathematical Sciences, Durham University, United Kin...

    1993

  86. [271]

    url: https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s40574-025-00458-7

    issn: 1972-6724.doi: 10.1007/s40574-025-00458-7 . url: https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s40574-025-00458-7

    1972 doi

  87. [9855]

    url: https://doi.org/10.4171/jems/1091

    doi: 10.4171/jems/1091. url: https://doi.org/10.4171/jems/1091

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.