Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 74 references

Multiband topological group-velocity control from slow light to light stopping

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-10 · glm-5.2

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Long-range coupling flattens topological edge states to stop light

desk verdict NNN couplings in a Harper-Hofstadter lattice flatten edge-state dispersions across three band gaps, giving multiband topological slow light and, at a slightly different coupling, zero-group-velocity 'light stopping.' The theory is clean and the result is genuinely new, but the light-stopping claim needs a gap-separation check and the experimental section is hand-wavy. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.08055 v1 pith:G2CWFKEI submitted 2026-07-09 physics.optics

Junhao Yang , Jiarui Wang , Jingyu Liu , Shirong Lin , Xinyuan Qi This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics PACS 42.82.Et03.65.Vf42.25.Bs
keywords topologicalphotonicsslowlightHarper-Hofstadtermodelnext-nearest-neighborcouplinggroupvelocityengineeringstoppingedgestatesChernnumber
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces next-nearest-neighbor (NNN) couplings into a Harper-Hofstadter photonic lattice to engineer the group velocity of topological edge states. The key finding is that a vertical long-range coupling opens a previously closed central band gap, while a horizontal long-range coupling flattens the dispersion of edge states across all three topological band gaps. This flattening reduces group velocities to near-zero values, enabling broadband topologically protected slow-light transport of edge states with opposite chiralities. By tuning the coupling parameter, the group velocity can be reduced to exactly zero, producing multiple topological light-stopping states where wave packets remain localized at their excitation position.

What carries the argument

Harper-Hofstadter lattice with NNN couplings; band-gap Chern number C_gap^(r) = sum of occupied band Chern numbers; group velocity v_g = dE/dk_x; coupled-mode equation i dA/dt = H A; auxiliary-state-mediated virtual tunneling for experimental realization

What would settle it

If the required coupling regime (delta ~ 0.3, eta ~ 0.3 relative to nearest-neighbor coupling ~ 1) cannot be experimentally realized with sufficient precision and low loss in photonic waveguide arrays, the slow-light and light-stopping claims remain purely theoretical predictions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central mechanism is the introduction of anisotropic long-range NNN couplings into a Harper-Hofstadter lattice. The vertical coupling parameter eta opens a closed band gap, creating additional topological edge channels, while the horizontal coupling parameter delta reshapes and flattens edge-state dispersions. In the regime 0.26 < delta <= 0.3, all slow-light modes maintain positive group velocity, enabling unidirectional topological slow-light transport. At delta = 0.32, zero-group-velocity points emerge where edge-state dispersions become locally flat, causing wave packets to stop propagating while remaining topologically protected. The band-gap Chern numbers (C1_gap = -1, C2_gap = -2,

Load-bearing premise

The feasibility of independently engineering the required long-range coupling ratios via auxiliary-state-mediated virtual tunneling in femtosecond-laser-written waveguides is argued qualitatively without quantitative estimates of achievable detuning, coupling strengths, or loss budgets.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Topological delay lines and optical buffers could be built using stopped-light edge states, combining robustness against disorder with controllable storage.
  • The counter-chiral slow-light channels in different band gaps could enable bidirectional optical signal routing on a single chip.
  • Tuning delta between 0.26 and 0.32 provides a continuous knob from slow-light to light-stopping regimes, useful for reconfigurable photonic circuits.
  • The mechanism of flattening edge-state dispersion via long-range coupling may generalize to other topological lattice models beyond Harper-Hofstadter.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the required coupling ratios (delta, eta ~ 0.3 relative to NN coupling) are experimentally achievable, this could yield on-chip optical memories where light is stored in topologically protected states indefinitely.
  • The appearance of negative group velocity regions at delta = 0.32 suggests a transition regime where edge-state transport reverses direction, which could be exploited for directional switching.
  • The reliance on auxiliary-state-mediated coupling introduces potential loss channels that may degrade topological protection in practice; quantitative loss analysis would determine whether the light-stopping effect survives realistic imperfections.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript introduces long-range next-nearest-neighbor (NNN) couplings into a Harper–Hofstadter (HH) photonic lattice to engineer the group velocity of topological edge states. The authors show that vertical NNN coupling (η) opens a previously closed band gap, while horizontal NNN coupling (δ) flattens edge-state dispersions, enabling topologically protected slow-light transport across all three band gaps. By tuning δ beyond the unidirectional slow-light regime (to δ = 0.32), the group velocity can be reduced to zero at specific operating points, yielding 'topological light-stopping' states. The band-structure calculations, Chern-number assignments, and propagation simulations are internally consistent, and the counter-chiral nature of edge transport in different gaps is verified under both ribbon and fully open boundary conditions. The central theoretical framework is sound and the results represent a meaningful contribution to topological slow-light engineering.

Significance. The simultaneous group-velocity control of multiple counter-chiral edge states in a multiband topological system is a non-trivial extension of existing topological slow-light work, which has largely focused on single edge channels. The use of long-range NNN couplings as a tuning mechanism is physically motivated and the demonstration of broadband slow light across three band gaps is a clear advance. The light-stopping claim, if verified to retain topological protection, would be a notable result. The falsifiable prediction of specific zero-group-velocity operating points (P4–P7) and the quantitative slow-light regime (0.26 < δ ≤ 0.3) are strengths. However, the significance of the light-stopping result is currently tempered by the absence of verification that the stopped states remain topologically isolated from the bulk (see Major Comments).

major comments (3)
  1. Section V, Fig. 7: The claim of 'topological light stopping' at δ = 0.32 rests on the emergence of zero-group-velocity points (P4–P7) in the edge-state dispersion. However, the manuscript does not verify that these zero-velocity edge states remain energetically separated from the nearest bulk bands. At δ = 0.3, the authors already acknowledge that edge state lx4 hybridizes with nearby bulk states (Section III). At δ = 0.32, where dispersions are flatter, the risk of edge-bulk hybridization is greater. The propagation simulations at t = 80 (Figs. 7(c1–f2)) show 'moderate spatial broadening,' which could signal incipient coupling to bulk modes or significant group-velocity dispersion. Without computing the minimum energy separation ΔE between the zero-velocity edge states and the nearest bulk bands at P4–P7, and confirming that this separation exceeds the wave-packet bandwidth, the 'topo-'
  2. Section V, Figs. 7(c1–f2): The propagation simulations for the light-stopping regime show spatial broadening of the wave packet over t = 80. The manuscript does not quantify this broadening or distinguish between broadening due to group-velocity dispersion (GVD) within the edge band and broadening due to leakage into bulk states. Since the central claim is topological protection of the stopped state, a quantitative analysis of the wave-packet fidelity (e.g., overlap with the initial edge-state eigenmode as a function of time) would strengthen the claim that the light-stopping effect is genuinely topologically protected.
  3. Section V: The transition from δ = 0.3 (unidirectional slow light, 0.26 < δ ≤ 0.3) to δ = 0.32 (light stopping) is described, but the manuscript does not discuss whether the band-gap Chern numbers remain unchanged at δ = 0.32. Since the NNN coupling breaks chiral symmetry and redistributes topological invariants, a topological phase transition could occur between δ = 0.3 and δ = 0.32. The authors should verify that the band-gap Chern numbers (C1_gap, C2_gap, C3_gap) = (−1, −2, 1) are unchanged at δ = 0.32, or discuss the implications if they are not.
minor comments (6)
  1. Section VI: The feasibility discussion for auxiliary-state-mediated long-range coupling is qualitative. A brief quantitative estimate of the required detuning and coupling ratios (δ/κ ≈ 0.3, η/κ ≈ 0.3) in realistic waveguide parameters would substantially improve the experimental outlook.
  2. Eq. (2): The diagonal elements h_t = 2κ cos(k_x − φ_t) + 2δ cos(2k_x) are defined, but the off-diagonal η terms appear as 'η + η e^{−ik_y}' without explicit factoring. A brief clarifying sentence would help readers parse the matrix structure.
  3. Section III: The condition 0.26 < δ ≤ 0.3 is stated as ensuring positive group velocity, but the origin of the lower bound 0.26 is not derived or referenced. A brief justification or pointer to a calculation would improve reproducibility.
  4. Fig. 2 caption: The labels lx1–lx6 are referenced in the caption but their correspondence to specific edge-state branches in panels (c1–e2) is not fully explicit. A direct mapping in the caption would aid the reader.
  5. Section IV: The statement that the second band gap does not support edge transport under fully open boundary conditions, but can be approximated by a ribbon geometry 'over a finite length scale,' is somewhat vague. A quantitative criterion for the required system size would be helpful.
  6. Reference [8] (J. Liu and S. Lin, Phys. Rev. A 113, 053514 (2026)) appears to be a future date; please verify.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity detected: the derivation chain is self-contained and no prediction reduces to its inputs by construction

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained and does not exhibit circularity. The Hamiltonian (Eq. 2) is constructed from standard tight-binding principles with NNN couplings, not fitted to a target result. The band-gap Chern numbers (Eq. 3) are computed from the band structure via standard topological invariants, not defined in terms of the edge-state properties they aim to explain. The slow-light and light-stopping conditions follow from the definition v_g = ∂E/∂k_x, which is a standard physical definition applied to the computed dispersion, not a fitted model renamed as a prediction. The correspondence between band-gap Chern number signs and edge-state chirality is verified by independent propagation simulations (Figs. 3, 5, 6, 7), not assumed by construction. No 'prediction' or 'first-principles result' reduces to a fitted parameter or to a self-citation chain. The self-citations present (e.g., Refs. 60–67 for NNN coupling mechanisms) provide context and motivation but are not load-bearing for the central mathematical claims, which are derived directly from the stated Hamiltonian. The feasibility discussion (Section VI) is qualitative but does not create circularity—it describes a possible experimental implementation without claiming the theoretical results are confirmed by that implementation. The skeptic's concern about whether zero-velocity edge states remain energetically separated from bulk bands at δ=0.32 is a correctness/verification issue, not a circularity issue.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are postulated. The free parameters (δ, η) are coupling strengths tuned to achieve the desired dispersion flattening. The axioms are standard tight-binding and topological physics assumptions, with the experimental feasibility relying on adiabatic elimination without quantitative verification.

free parameters (4)
  • δ (horizontal NNN coupling) = 0.3 (slow-light regime); 0.32 (light-stopping regime)
    Chosen to flatten edge-state dispersions while maintaining positive group velocity; tuned to reach zero-group-velocity points.
  • η (vertical NNN coupling) = 0.3
    Chosen to open the previously closed central band gap.
  • φ (Peierls phase) = π/2
    Standard HH model parameter p/q=1/4; not fitted but selected for the 4-band case.
  • κ, g (NN couplings) = 1, 1
    Set to unity as energy units; standard normalization.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Tight-binding approximation for photonic waveguide arrays
    The entire Hamiltonian (Eq. 1) is built on the tight-binding framework; standard for coupled-waveguide systems.
  • domain assumption Adiabatic elimination of auxiliary waveguide modes in large-detuning regime
    Section VI invokes this to justify effective NNN couplings; standard perturbation theory but applied without quantitative detuning estimates.
  • standard math Band-gap Chern number determines number and chirality of edge states
    Bulk-boundary correspondence; Eq. 3 defines gap Chern numbers as sums of band Chern numbers.
  • domain assumption Floquet-averaged Hamiltonian equivalent to static HH model
    Section VI assumes the Floquet modulation and auxiliary-state coupling act on independent scales; not quantitatively verified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multiband topological group-velocity control from slow light to light stopping." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/G2CWFKEI

@misc{pith2026260708055,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multiband topological group-velocity control from slow light to light stopping},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/G2CWFKEI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.08055}
}
read the original abstract

We introduce next-nearest-neighbor (NNN) couplings into a Harper--Hofstadter photonic lattice to establish a long-range topological photonic platform for group-velocity engineering. We show that the NNN couplings not only open a previously closed band gap but also flatten the dispersion of the edge states, thereby offering a potential route toward topological slow-light control. Theoretical calculations reveal that the band gaps support band-gap Chern numbers with opposite signs. Propagation simulations demonstrate robust, topologically protected slow-light transport of counter-chiral edge states, while the presence of slow-light edge states in all three topological band gaps enables broadband topological slow light. By further tuning the NNN coupling parameter, multiple topological light-stopping states can be realized. These results establish long-range NNN coupling as an effective mechanism for topological group-velocity engineering and provide new design principles for topological slow-light devices, optical delay lines, and integrated multiband photonic systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.08055 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic of the photonic HH lattice. The left and right panels show the NN and NNN coupling configurations, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Band structures and edge-state profiles of the HH lattices. (a1,b1) Bulk and ribbon band structures of the NN HH [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Propagation chirality of topological edge states. (a) Excitation and propagation regions of the upper and lower edge [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Eigenmode distributions under open boundary conditions. (a) Eigenvalue spectrum of the finite HH lattice under fully [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Counter-chiral transport of topological edge states. (a1–a4) Clockwise propagation of the first-band-gap edge states. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Counter-chiral slow-light edge transport and robustness verification. (a1–a3) Group-velocity curves of slow-light edge [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Topological light stopping. (a) Ribbon band structure for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Yariv and P

    A. Yariv and P. Yeh,Optical Waves in Crystals: Propagation and Control of Laser Radiation, A Wiley interscience publication (Wiley, 1984)

    work page 1984

  2. [2]

    M. Born, E. Wolf, and A. Bhatia,Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light(Cambridge University Press, 1999)

    work page 1999

  3. [3]

    T. F. Krauss, Why do we need slow light?, Nature Photonics2, 448 (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Parra and J

    E. Parra and J. R. Lowell, Toward applications of slow light technology, Opt. Photon. News18, 40 (2007)

    work page 2007

  5. [5]

    T. F. Krauss, Slow light in photonic crystal waveguides, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics40, 2666 (2007)

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    C. Liu, Z. Dutton, C. H. Behroozi, and L. V. Hau, Observation of coherent optical information storage in an atomic medium using halted light pulses, Nature409, 490 (2001)

    work page 2001

  7. [7]

    Baba, Slow light in photonic crystals, Nature Photonics2, 465 (2008)

    T. Baba, Slow light in photonic crystals, Nature Photonics2, 465 (2008)

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    Liu and S

    J. Liu and S. Lin, Tunable rotation-associated slow-to-fast light conversion via optomagnonic coupling, Physical Review A113, 053514 (2026)

    work page 2026

Show all 74 references
  1. [9]

    L. V. Hau, S. E. Harris, Z. Dutton, and C. H. Behroozi, Light speed reduction to 17 metres per second in an ultracold atomic gas, Nature397, 594 (1999)

    1999

  2. [10]

    Fleischhauer, A

    M. Fleischhauer, A. Imamoglu, and J. P. Marangos, Electromagnetically induced transparency: Optics in coherent media, Reviews of Modern Physics77, 633 (2005)

    2005

  3. [11]

    Piredda and R

    G. Piredda and R. W. Boyd, Slow light by means of coherent population oscillations: laser linewidth effects, J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ.2, 07004 (2007)

    2007

  4. [12]

    R. W. Boyd and D. J. Gauthier, Controlling the velocity of light pulses, Science326, 1074 (2009)

    2009

  5. [13]

    Cheng, Z

    P. Cheng, Z. Xiao, X. Jiang, Y. Liu, and X. Cai, A reconfigurable three-dimensional electromagnetically induced trans- parency metamaterial with low loss and large group delay, Electronics12, 4930 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    J. B. Khurgin, Optical buffers based on slow light in electromagnetically induced transparent media and coupled resonator structures: comparative analysis, Journal of the Optical Society of America B22, 1062 (2005)

    2005

  7. [15]

    Chuang, Significant enhancement of group delay in electromagnetically induced transparency with a spatially partially coherent coupling field, Physical Review A108, 063707 (2023)

    Y.-L. Chuang, Significant enhancement of group delay in electromagnetically induced transparency with a spatially partially coherent coupling field, Physical Review A108, 063707 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    A. H. Safavi-Naeiniet al., Electromagnetically induced transparency and slow light with optomechanics, Nature472, 69 (2011)

    2011

  9. [17]

    Lederer, G

    F. Lederer, G. I. Stegeman, D. N. Christodoulides, G. Assanto, M. Segev, and Y. Silberberg, Discrete solitons in optics, Physics Reports463, 1 (2008)

    2008

  10. [18]

    L. H. F. et al., Photonic crystal waveguides with semi-slow light and tailored dispersion properties, Optics Express14, 9444 (2006)

    2006

  11. [19]

    S. Lin, Y. Liang, J. Zhang, M. K. Chen, and D. P. Tsai, Controllable flatbands via non-hermiticity, Applied Physics Letters 123, 221103 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    Mori and T

    D. Mori and T. Baba, Wideband and low dispersion slow light by chirped photonic crystal waveguide, Optics Express13, 9398 (2005)

    2005

  13. [21]

    Y. H. et al., Slow light with low dispersion in a lattice-shifted photonic crystal waveguide, Optics Letters34, 1072 (2009)

    2009

  14. [22]

    Y. A. V. et al., Active control of slow light on a chip with photonic crystal waveguides, Nature438, 65 (2005)

    2005

  15. [23]

    N. Zhu, Y. Wang, Q. Ren, L. Zhu, M. Yuan, and G. An, Slow light in nonlinear photonic crystal coupled-cavity waveguides, Optics & Laser Technology57, 154 (2014)

    2014

  16. [24]

    Katti, Photonic delay lines based on silicon coupled resonator optical waveguide structures, Silicon10, 2793 (2018)

    R. Katti, Photonic delay lines based on silicon coupled resonator optical waveguide structures, Silicon10, 2793 (2018)

    2018

  17. [25]

    Notomi, K

    M. Notomi, K. Yamada, A. Shinya, J. Takahashi, C. Takahashi, and I. Yokohama, Extremely large group-velocity dispersion of line-defect waveguides in photonic crystal slabs, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 253902 (2001)

    2001

  18. [26]

    A. E. Miroshnichenko and Y. S. Kivshar, Sharp bends in photonic crystal waveguides as nonlinear fano resonators., Optics express13 11, 3969 (2005)

    2005

  19. [27]

    F. D. M. Haldane and S. Raghu, Possible realization of directional optical waveguides in photonic crystals with broken time-reversal symmetry, Physical Review Letters100, 013904 (2008)

    2008

  20. [28]

    Z. Wang, Y. D. Chong, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, Observation of unidirectional backscattering-immune topo- logical electromagnetic states, Nature461, 772 (2009). 10

    2009

  21. [29]

    Poo, R.-x

    Y. Poo, R.-x. Wu, Z. Lin, Y. Yang, and C. T. Chan, Experimental realization of self-guiding unidirectional electromagnetic edge states, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 093903 (2011)

    2011

  22. [30]

    L. Lu, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, Topological photonics, Nature Photonics8, 821 (2014)

    2014

  23. [31]

    Ozawa, H

    T. Ozawa, H. M. Price, A. Amo, N. Goldman, M. Hafezi, L. Lu, M. C. Rechtsman, D. Schuster, J. Simon, O. Zilberberg, and I. Carusotto, Topological photonics, Reviews of Modern Physics91, 015006 (2019)

    2019

  24. [32]

    A. B. Khanikaev and A. Al` u, Topological photonics: robustness and beyond, Nature Communications15, 931 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    Cui, R.-Y

    X. Cui, R.-Y. Zhang, Z.-Q. Zhang, and C. T. Chan, Photonic𭟋 2 topological anderson insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 043902 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    Guglielmon and M

    J. Guglielmon and M. C. Rechtsman, Broadband topological slow light through higher momentum-space winding, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 153904 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    L. Yu, H. Xue, and B. Zhang, Topological slow light via coupling chiral edge modes with flatbands, Applied Physics Letters 118, 071102 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    M. C. Rechtsman, J. M. Zeuner, Y. Plotnik, Y. Lumer, D. Podolsky, F. Dreisow, S. Nolte, and M. Segev, Photonic floquet topological insulators, Nature496, 196 (2013)

    2013

  29. [37]

    S. A. Mann and A. Al` u, Broadband topological slow light through brillouin zone winding, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 123601 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    Ma and G

    T. Ma and G. Shvets, All-si valley-hall photonic topological insulator, New Journal of Physics18, 025012 (2016)

    2016

  31. [39]

    Kumar, Y

    A. Kumar, Y. J. Tan, N. Navaratna, M. Gupta, P. Pitchappa, and R. Singh, Slow light topological photonics with counter- propagating waves and its active control on a chip, Nature Communications15, 926 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    C. Peng, G. Li, J. Yang, C. Ma, and X. Qi, Tunable slow light in valley-locked topological photonic crystal waveguide, Photonics12, 332 (2025)

    2025

  33. [41]

    Kitagawa, E

    T. Kitagawa, E. Berg, M. Rudner, and E. Demler, Topological characterization of periodically driven quantum systems, Physical Review B82, 235114 (2010)

    2010

  34. [42]

    Hafezi, S

    M. Hafezi, S. Mittal, J. Fan, A. Migdall, and J. Taylor, Imaging topological edge states in silicon photonics, Nature Photonics7, 1001 (2013)

    2013

  35. [43]

    W. Wang, Z. Shen, Y. J. Tan, K. Chen, and R. Singh, On-chip topological edge state cavities, Light: Science & Applications 14, 330 (2025)

    2025

  36. [44]

    P. G. Harper, Single Band Motion of Conduction Electrons in a Uniform Magnetic Field, Proceedings of the Physical Society A68, 874 (1955)

    1955

  37. [45]

    D. R. Hofstadter, Energy levels and wave functions of bloch electrons in rational and irrational magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. B14, 2239 (1976)

    1976

  38. [46]

    Harper, S

    F. Harper, S. H. Simon, and R. Roy, Perturbative approach to flat chern bands in the hofstadter model, Phys. Rev. B90, 075104 (2014)

    2014

  39. [47]

    M¨ oller and N

    G. M¨ oller and N. R. Cooper, Fractional chern insulators in harper-hofstadter bands with higher chern number, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 126401 (2015)

    2015

  40. [48]

    M. M. Wauters and G. E. Santoro, Quantization of the hall conductivity in the harper-hofstadter model, Phys. Rev. B98, 205112 (2018)

    2018

  41. [49]

    Xiang, K

    Z.-C. Xiang, K. Huang, Y.-R. Zhang, T. Liu, Y.-H. Shi, C.-L. Deng, T. Liu, H. Li, G.-H. Liang, Z.-Y. Mei, H. Yu, G. Xue, Y. Tian, X. Song, Z.-B. Liu, K. Xu, D. Zheng, F. Nori, and H. Fan, Simulating chern insulators on a superconducting quantum processor, Nature Communications...

    2023

  42. [50]

    Ye and X

    F. Ye and X. Sun, Hofstadter butterfly and topological edge states in a quasiperiodic photonic crystal cavity array, Opt. Express30, 26620 (2022)

    2022

  43. [51]

    X. Han, F. Li, D.-X. Qiu, K. Xue, and X. X. Yi, Quantized fields induced topological features in harper-hofstadter model, AAPPS Bulletin33, 1 (2023)

    2023

  44. [52]

    Dutra, M

    R. Dutra, M. Vasconcelos, and D. Anselmo, Hofstadter butterfly in optical multilayers, Optical Materials144, 114338 (2023)

    2023

  45. [53]

    S. Lin, L. Wang, L. Yuan, and X. Chen, All-optical control of the photonic hall lattice in a pumped waveguide array, Phys. Rev. Appl.17, 064029 (2022)

    2022

  46. [54]

    Secl` ı, M

    M. Secl` ı, M. Capone, and I. Carusotto, Theory of chiral edge state lasing in a two-dimensional topological system, Phys. Rev. Res.1, 033148 (2019)

    2019

  47. [55]

    Amelio and I

    I. Amelio and I. Carusotto, Theory of the coherence of topological lasers, Phys. Rev. X10, 041060 (2020)

    2020

  48. [56]

    S. Chen, L. Zheng, L. Zhao, S. Ke, B. Wang, and P. Lu, Photonic skin-topological effects in microring lattices, Opt. Lett. 48, 5763 (2023)

    2023

  49. [57]

    Li, Y.-P

    L. Li, Y.-P. Wang, and A.-X. Chen, Hofstadter butterfly and topological edge states in a one-dimensional cavity magnonic lattice, Phys. Rev. A112, 043721 (2025)

    2025

  50. [58]

    M. E. Tai, A. Lukin, M. Rispoli, R. Schittko, T. Menke, D. Borgnia, P. M. Preiss, F. Grusdt, A. M. Kaufman, and M. Greiner, Microscopy of the interacting harper–hofstadter model in the two-body limit, Nature546, 519 (2017)

    2017

  51. [59]

    C. Vega, D. Porras, and A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, Topological multimode waveguide QED, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 023031 (2023)

    2023

  52. [60]

    G. Kim, J. Suh, D. Lee, N. Park, and S. Yu, Long-range-interacting topological photonic lattices breaking channel- bandwidth limit, Light: Science & Applications13, 189 (2024)

    2024

  53. [61]

    Li, Z.-M

    J.-Q. Li, Z.-M. Gao, W.-X. Liu, and X. Wang, Light-matter interactions in a hofstadter lattice with next-nearest-neighbor couplings, Phys. Rev. A108, 043708 (2023)

    2023

  54. [62]

    H. C. Wu, L. Jin, and Z. Song, Nontrivial topological phase with a zero chern number, Phys. Rev. B102, 035145 (2020). 11

    2020

  55. [63]

    Leykam, S

    D. Leykam, S. Mittal, M. Hafezi, and Y. D. Chong, Reconfigurable topological phases in next-nearest-neighbor coupled resonator lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 023901 (2018)

    2018

  56. [64]

    B. A. Bell, K. Wang, A. S. Solntsev, D. N. Neshev, A. A. Sukhorukov, and B. J. Eggleton, Spectral photonic lattices with complex long-range coupling, Optica4, 1433 (2017)

    2017

  57. [65]

    Pellerin, R

    F. Pellerin, R. Houvenaghel, W. A. Coish, I. Carusotto, and P. St-Jean, Wave-function tomography of topological dimer chains with long-range couplings, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 183802 (2024)

    2024

  58. [66]

    P. Wang, L. Huang, H. Zhang, H. Yang, and D. Yan, Unconventional light-matter interactions between giant atoms and structured baths with next-nearest-neighbor couplings, Annalen der Physik536, 2400165 (2024)

    2024

  59. [67]

    C.-X. Du, N. Xu, L. Du, Y. Zhang, and J.-H. Wu, Topological edge states controlled by next-nearest-neighbor coupling and peierls phase in a p t-symmetric trimerized lattice, Opt. Express29, 37722 (2021)

    2021

  60. [68]

    R. Keil, B. Pressl, R. Heilmann, M. Gr¨ afe, G. Weihs, and A. Szameit, Direct measurement of second-order coupling in a waveguide lattice, Applied Physics Letters107(2015)

    2015

  61. [69]

    Pertsch, T

    T. Pertsch, T. Zentgraf, U. Peschel, A. Br¨ auer, and F. Lederer, Anomalous refraction and diffraction in discrete optical systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 093901 (2002)

    2002

  62. [70]

    C. Qin, M. Liu, B. Wang, S. Longhi, and P. Lu, Regulating light refraction and reflection using speed-tailored optical potentials, Laser & Photonics Reviews19, e00206 (2025)

    2025

  63. [71]

    L. J. Maczewsky, J. M. Zeuner, S. Nolte, and A. Szameit, Observation of photonic anomalous floquet topological insulators, Nature Communications8, 13756 (2017)

    2017

  64. [72]

    Mukherjee and M

    S. Mukherjee and M. C. Rechtsman, Observation of floquet solitons in a topological bandgap, Science368, 856 (2020)

    2020

  65. [73]

    Szameit and S

    A. Szameit and S. Nolte, Discrete optics in femtosecond-laser-written photonic structures, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics43, 163001 (2010)

    2010

  66. [74]

    Mrejen, H

    M. Mrejen, H. Suchowski, T. Hatakeyama, C. Wu, L. Feng, K. O’Brien, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, Adiabatic elimination- based coupling control in densely packed subwavelength waveguides, Nature Communications6, 7565 (2015)

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed July 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.