Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 40 references

Spatial Sobolev regularity for stochastic Burgers equations with additive trace class noise

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Stochastic Burgers equations with additive trace-class noise have unique mild solutions in Sobolev spaces up to order min{1, 1/2+β}.

desk verdict A serious, detailed regularity paper for stochastic Burgers equations whose main theorem is probably true but whose stated β>-1/4 range is not fully proven, because Lemma 5.8 requires an H-bounded symmetric representative of B that HS(H,H^β) does not provide for β<0. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.06128 v1 pith:G52RRJOM submitted 2019-08-16 math.PR math.FA

Arnulf Jentzen , Felix Lindner , Primož Pušnik This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PRmath.FA MSC 60H1535R6035Q5346E35
keywords stochasticBurgersequationSobolevregularitytraceclassnoisemildsolutionsGalerkinapproximationsbootstrapargumentconvolutionfactorizationmethod
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves a higher-order spatial Sobolev regularity theorem for the stochastic Burgers equation on the unit interval with zero Dirichlet boundary conditions and additive trace-class noise. For noise operator $B\in \operatorname{HS}(H,H^\beta)$ with $\beta>-1/4$ and initial datum in $H^1$, it establishes an up-to-indistinguishability unique mild solution with continuous paths in $H^\gamma$ for every $\gamma\in(1/4,\min\{1,1/2+\beta\})$. Previous results reached Sobolev order at most $1/2$; here the nonlinearity is no longer the bottleneck. The attainable regularity is capped by the noise: when $\beta<1/2$ the threshold is $1/2+\beta$, and when $\beta\ge 1/2$ the solution reaches every order below $1$. The proof works by extending the Burgers nonlinearity $v\mapsto c_1 v\,\partial v$ to a continuous map from $H^{1/8}$ to $H^{-1/2}$, then propagating spatial regularity through bootstrap-type a priori estimates and a pathwise decay estimate for the stochastic convolution.

What carries the argument

Three components carry the argument. First, the Burgers nonlinearity is analysed through the identity $v\,\partial v=\tfrac12\partial(v^2)$: using the Sobolev embedding $H^{1/8}\hookrightarrow L^4$, the paper shows that $v^2\in L^2$ for $v\in H^{1/8}$, so $\partial(v^2)$ lies in $H^{-1/2}$, and this yields a unique continuous extension $F:H^{1/8}\to H^{-1/2}$ with a local Lipschitz estimate $\|F(v)-F(w)\|_{H^{-1/2}}\le C\|v-w\|_{H^{1/8}}(1+\|v\|_{H^{1/8}}+\|w\|_{H^{1/8}})$. Second, bootstrap-type a priori bounds for spatial spectral Galerkin approximations transfer a bound in $H^\rho$ into a bound in a higher space $H^\eta$ by inserting the previous bound into the growth estimate for $F$ in a negative Sobolev space. Third, the stochastic convolution is controlled by a factorization method that produces, for every $\eta<1+2(\beta-\gamma)$, pathwise decay $n^{\eta}\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\|O_t-P_{I_n}O_t\|_{H^\gamma}<\infty$ for the high-frequency part of the noise term; this is what lets the Galerkin solutions pass to the limit in $H^\gamma$.

What would settle it

Construct a trace-class noise operator $B\in\operatorname{HS}(H,H^\beta)$ for some $\beta\in(-1/4,0)$ together with an initial datum in $H^1$, and test whether the spectral Galerkin approximations remain bounded in $H^\gamma$ for a chosen $\gamma<1/2+\beta$ and whether the high-frequency stochastic-convolution decay used in the proof holds. If for some such $B$ the decay fails, the convergence argument collapses for that noise; if the Galerkin family diverges in $H^\gamma$, the theorem's regularity range is false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On $H=L^2((0,1))$, with $A$ the Dirichlet Laplacian and $H^r=D((-A)^r)$, the main theorem asserts that for $\beta\in(-1/4,\infty)$, $\gamma\in(1/4,\min\{1,1/2+\beta\})$, $\xi\in H^1$, trace-class noise operator $B\in \operatorname{HS}(H,H^\beta)$, and a cylindrical Wiener process $W$, there is an up-to-indistinguishability unique adapted process $X$ with continuous sample paths in $H^\gamma$ satisfying $X_t=e^{tA}\xi+\int_0^t e^{(t-s)A}F(X_s)\,ds+\int_0^t e^{(t-s)A}B\,dW_s$, where $F:H^{1/8}\to H^{-1/2}$ is the unique continuous extension of the map $v\mapsto c_1 v\,\partial v$ originally defined on $H^{1/2}$. This is a regularity theorem: the solution's Sobolev order is controlled by the noise's spectral decay, not by the quadratic nonlinearity. In particular, for $\beta\ge 1/2$ the result gives $H^\gamma$ regularity for every $\gamma<1$, and for $\beta\in(-1/4,0)$ it gives the previously unavailable range $\gamma\in(1/4,1/2+\beta)$.

Load-bearing premise

The convergence proof assumes the noise operator has a bounded symmetric representative on the square-integrable function space; for rough trace-class noise with $\beta<0$, that representative is assumed to exist rather than derived from the Hilbert-Schmidt assumption.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For noise with spectral exponent $\beta\ge 1/2$, the theorem yields Sobolev regularity $H^\gamma$ for every $\gamma<1$, so the only spatial-smoothness barrier left is the endpoint $H^1$ itself.
  • For rough trace-class noise with $\beta\in(-1/4,0)$, the attainable range $1/4<\gamma<1/2+\beta$ is nonempty exactly when $\beta>-1/4$; more singular trace-class noise would push the solution below $H^{1/4}$.
  • The Galerkin approximations used in the proof converge pathwise to the solution in $H^\gamma$ with rate $n^{-\eta}$ for any $\eta<1+2(\beta-\gamma)$, giving quantitative spatial discretization rates for these SPDEs.
  • Because the nonlinearity is extended to $H^{1/8}\to H^{-1/2}$, the equation is meaningful for solution paths that are only mildly regular in space, and uniqueness holds among adapted processes with continuous sample paths in $H^\gamma$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The regularity cap $\min\{1,1/2+\beta\}$ suggests a matching-principle conjecture for other one-dimensional SPDEs whose nonlinearity is the derivative of a quadratic: the noise's smoothing, measured by $\beta$, should add $1/2$ to the solution's Sobolev order until the nonlinearity's own domain barrier at order $1$ intervenes.
  • A testable consequence is endpoint sharpness: the estimates leave $H^{\min\{1,1/2+\beta\}}$ unattained, and numerical experiments could check whether solutions lose regularity only logarithmically at the endpoint or fail outright.
  • Because the regularity threshold is set by $1/2+\beta$, any gain in the noise's Hilbert-Schmidt regularity $\beta$ should transfer one-for-one into additional Sobolev regularity of the path, up to the $H^1$ cap; measuring the spectral decay of the noise is therefore a practical way to predict where the solution's spatial smoothness saturates.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the one-dimensional stochastic Burgers equation with additive trace-class noise on (0,1) under zero Dirichlet boundary conditions. The main result (Theorem 5.10, simplified as Theorem 1.1) states that for noise operator B ∈ HS(H,H^β) with β > -1/4 and spatial smoothness γ ∈ (1/4, min{1, 1/2+β}), there exists an up-to-indistinguishability unique mild solution with continuous sample paths in H^γ, provided the initial datum is sufficiently regular. The nonlinearity c₁ v ∂v is shown to extend uniquely from H^{1/2} to a continuous map H^{1/8} → H^{-1/2}. The proof combines spectral Galerkin approximations, bootstrap-type a priori bounds, a detailed analysis of the quadratic nonlinearity in Sobolev and interpolation spaces, the factorization method for stochastic convolutions, and an abstract convergence theorem of Blömker and Jentzen. The exposition is detailed and largely self-contained, with only a handful of auxiliary results imported from other papers.

Significance. If the proof is completed as suggested below, the result would be a clean extension of the previously known regularity threshold for the stochastic Burgers equation with additive noise: it interpolates smoothly between the white-noise case (β = -1/2 threshold) and arbitrarily smooth trace-class noise, giving H^γ regularity for γ up to arbitrarily close to 1. The paper is strong on explicit, quantitative a priori bounds, and the analysis of the nonlinearity is careful and self-contained. No parameter fitting or tuning of the abstract framework is involved; the claims are conditional on explicit hypotheses on the noise and initial data. These are real strengths. However, as written, the proof of the key stochastic-convolution tail estimate has a gap in the range β < 0, and that range is part of the stated theorem.

major comments (2)
  1. [Lemma 5.8 (proof) and its use in Theorem 5.10] The proof of Lemma 5.8 begins by fixing an H-bounded symmetric operator B ∈ L(H) satisfying ⟨Bu,v⟩_H = ⟨u,Bv⟩_H, but the lemma's hypotheses only assume B ∈ HS(H,H^β). For β < 0, which is allowed in Theorem 5.10, such a representative need not exist and is not shown to exist. For example, with the sine basis (e_n), take β = -0.1 and B e_n = n^{-1/2} e_n. Then ∑_n ‖B e_n‖²_{H^β} = ∑_n n^{-1} n^{-0.4} < ∞, so B ∈ HS(H,H^β), but ∑_n ‖B e_n‖²_H = ∑_n n^{-1} = ∞, so B ∉ L(H). Consequently the invocation of Lemma 5.6 is invalid in this parameter range, and the tail bound (253) is not established. Inequality (253) is used in the proof of Theorem 5.10 to verify the hypotheses of [4, Theorem 3.1] via (277), so the main theorem is not fully proved for β ∈ (-1/4,0). A repair appears straightforward: one can bound ‖P_{H\I_n} e^{sA} B‖_{HS(H,H^γ)} directly by ‖(-A)^{γ-β} P_{H\I_n} e^{sA}‖_{L(H)} ‖B‖_{HS(H,H^β)} and then sum the resulting n-dependent terms, avoiding any L(H) representative of B. The manuscript should include such an argument.
  2. [Lemma 5.6 (hypotheses)] Lemma 5.6 assumes the existence of a symmetric operator B ∈ L(H) with ⟨Bu,v⟩_H = ⟨u,Bv⟩_H, in addition to B ∈ HS(H,H^β). This is not automatic from B ∈ HS(H,H^β) when β < 0, as the example in the previous comment shows. Moreover, Theorem 5.10 does not impose any self-adjointness condition on the noise operator. Therefore, as written, the chain of applications Lemma 5.6 → Lemma 5.8 → Theorem 5.10 requires an additional structural assumption on B that is not part of the theorem's statement. The authors should either extend Lemma 5.6 to the setting B ∈ HS(H,H^β) (for example by proving (253) via the direct Hilbert-Schmidt estimate indicated above), or add an explicit extra hypothesis on B.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Lemma 5.6, equation (245)] In the proof of Lemma 5.6, the factor sin(απ)/π is dropped when passing to the inequality (245); since |sin(απ)/π| ≤ 1/π < 1 for α ∈ (0,1), the bound remains valid, but the text should mention this.
  2. [Lemma 5.8, first sentence of the proof] The phrase 'let B ∈ L(H) satisfy ⟨Bu,v⟩_H = ⟨u,Bv⟩_H' appears as though it were a trivial consequence of the previous line; the paper should clearly state that this is an additional assumption that is not automatically satisfied and either prove it from the hypotheses or remove it.
  3. [Lemma 5.7] The proof introduces an auxiliary parameter δ that is never used; only ε and p are needed. This is harmless but can be cleaned up.
  4. [General typesetting] The submitted arXiv text contains numerous character substitutions (e.g., '/CA' for the complex numbers, '/C6' for the natural numbers), which make the manuscript difficult to read in places. The authors should ensure that the published version uses correct mathematical symbols.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the regularity theorem is derived from explicit estimates, not by fitting or by self-referential definitions.

full rationale

The main result, Theorem 5.10, is an existence/uniqueness and Sobolev-regularity statement, and no parameter is fitted to any subset of data. The nonlinear extension F: H^(1/8) -> H^(-1/2) is constructed in Corollary 4.18 from the concrete map F(v) = c1 v dv on H^(1/2), using density of H^(1/2) in H^(1/8) and explicit local Lipschitz bounds (Lemmas 4.15 and 4.17); it is not defined in terms of the solution, so there is no self-definitional loop. The stochastic convolution is analyzed directly in Lemma 5.5, giving the threshold gamma < 1/2 + beta from the Hilbert-Schmidt condition B in HS(H,H^beta); Lemma 5.8 adds the spectral Galerkin tail bound used to verify the hypotheses of Blomker-Jentzen [4, Theorem 3.1]. All hypotheses (273), (277), and (280) are checked in the paper before invoking [4], so the external theorem is used as an abstract existence criterion rather than as a renamed version of the Burgers result. The self-citations (e.g., [19, Corollary 2.7] in Lemma 2.3, [20] in Lemma 4.3, and [21] for bootstrap references) concern auxiliary chain-rule or embedding facts and do not assume the stochastic Burgers theorem under proof; [4] is published independent work. A separate correctness concern, which is not circularity, is that Lemma 5.8 begins by assuming a symmetric H-bounded representative B in L(H) of the noise operator, while B in HS(H,H^beta) with beta < 0 need not imply such a representative; this affects the proof in the range beta in (-1/4,0), but it is a gap in justification rather than a reduction of the claim to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted constants appear; c0, c1, beta, gamma, T, epsilon, B, and xi are equation data or hypotheses. The proof relies on standard interpolation and stochastic-analysis facts and on two specialized external results, [4, Theorem 3.1] and [19, Corollary 2.7], the latter a self-citation. The suspected gap is not an invented entity or fitted parameter but an unproved existence of a bounded adjoint representative in Lemma 5.6.

assumptions (7)
  • standard math Interpolation identities H^s = D((-A)^s) and equivalence of (H,D(A))_{s,2} with H^s
    Invoked in Lemma 4.6 and throughout Section 4 to convert operator-scale regularity into Sobolev-Slobodeckij regularity.
  • standard math Sobolev multiplication inequality W^{q,2} x W^{r,2} -> W^{s,2} for q+r-s > 1/2
    Lemma 4.7, cited to Behzadan and Holst [2, Theorem 7.5]; used in nonlinearity estimates in Lemmas 4.15 and 4.20.
  • standard math Gagliardo-Nirenberg type interpolation inequalities, Lemmas 4.11 and 4.12
    Used to bound L-infinity and L4 norms in Lemma 4.19 and Corollary 4.24.
  • standard math Burkholder-Davis-Gundy inequality and factorization method for stochastic convolutions
    Lemmas 5.5 and 5.6 use Da Prato and Zabczyk [9, Lemma 7.7] and [11, Theorem 5.10].
  • standard math Kolmogorov-Chentsov continuity theorem
    Used to obtain continuous versions of stochastic convolutions in Lemmas 5.5 and 5.6.
  • domain assumption Blomker and Jentzen [4, Theorem 3.1], abstract Galerkin convergence theorem
    Load-bearing final step in Theorem 5.10; converts uniform a priori bounds and approximation estimates into existence of the limiting mild solution and a convergence rate. The paper checks the hypotheses but does not prove the theorem.
  • domain assumption Jentzen, Lindner and Pusnik [19, Corollary 2.7]
    Self-cited auxiliary estimate used in the proof of Lemma 2.3 for a weighted Gronwall argument; not reproduced in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spatial Sobolev regularity for stochastic Burgers equations with additive trace class noise." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/G52RRJOM

@misc{pith2026190806128,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spatial Sobolev regularity for stochastic Burgers equations with additive trace class noise},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/G52RRJOM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.06128}
}
read the original abstract

In this article we investigate the spatial Sobolev regularity of mild solutions to stochastic Burgers equations with additive trace class noise. Our findings are based on a combination of suitable bootstrap-type arguments and a detailed analysis of the nonlinearity in the equation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D., and Border, K

    Aliprantis, C. D., and Border, K. C. Infinite dimensional analysis , third ed. Springer, Berlin, 2006. A hitchhiker’s guide

    work page 2006

  2. [2]

    Multiplication in Sobolev spaces, revisited

    Behzadan, A., and Holst, M. Multiplication in Sobolev spaces, revisited. arXiv:1512.07379 (2017), 24 pages

    arXiv 2017

  3. [3]

    The stochastic Burgers equation

    Bertini, L., Cancrini, N., and Jona-Lasinio, G. The stochastic Burgers equation. Comm. Math. Phys. 165 , 2 (1994), 211–232

    work page 1994

  4. [4]

    Galerkin approximations for the stochastic Burgers equation

    Bl¨omker, D., and Jentzen, A. Galerkin approximations for the stochastic Burgers equation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 51 , 1 (2013), 694–715

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    Functional analysis, Sobolev spaces and partial differenti al equations

    Brezis, H. Functional analysis, Sobolev spaces and partial differenti al equations . Universi- text. Springer, New York, 2011

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    Ergodic properties of fractional stochastic Burgers equation

    Brze´zniak, Z., Debbi, L., and Goldys, B. Ergodic properties of fractional stochastic Burgers equation. Glob. Stoch. Anal. 1 , 2 (2011), 149–174

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    Stochastic Burgers’ equation

    Da Prato, G., Debussche, A., and Temam, R. Stochastic Burgers’ equation. NoDEA Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl. 1 , 4 (1994), 389–402

    work page 1994

  8. [8]

    Stochastic Burgers equation with correlated noise

    Da Prato, G., and Gatarek, D. Stochastic Burgers equation with correlated noise. Stochastics Stochastics Rep. 52 , 1-2 (1995), 29–41

    work page 1995

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    Stochastic equations in infinite dimensions , vol

    Da Prato, G., and Zabczyk, J. Stochastic equations in infinite dimensions , vol. 44 of Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992

    1992

  2. [10]

    Ergodicity for infinite-dimensional systems , vol

    Da Prato, G., and Zabczyk, J. Ergodicity for infinite-dimensional systems , vol. 229 of London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996

    1996

  3. [11]

    Stochastic equations in infinite dimensions , second ed., vol

    Da Prato, G., and Zabczyk, J. Stochastic equations in infinite dimensions , second ed., vol. 152 of Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014

    2014

  4. [12]

    Dong, Z., and Xu, T. G. One-dimensional stochastic Burgers equation driven by L´ e vy processes. J. Funct. Anal. 243 , 2 (2007), 631–678

    2007

  5. [13]

    Concrete characterization of the domains of fractional pow ers of some elliptic differential operators of the second order

    Fujiwara, D. Concrete characterization of the domains of fractional pow ers of some elliptic differential operators of the second order. Proc. Japan Acad. 43 (1967), 82–86

    1967

  6. [14]

    Stochastic Evolution Equations: A Hilbert Space Ap- proach

    Grecksch, W., and Tudor, C. Stochastic Evolution Equations: A Hilbert Space Ap- proach. Wiley, New York, 1996

    1996

  7. [15]

    Existence and uniqueness results for semilinear stochasti c partial differential equations

    Gy¨ongy, I. Existence and uniqueness results for semilinear stochasti c partial differential equations. Stochastic Process. Appl. 73 , 2 (1998), 271–299

    1998

  8. [16]

    On the stochastic Burgers’ equation in the real line

    Gy¨ongy, I., and Nualart, D. On the stochastic Burgers’ equation in the real line. Ann. Probab. 27, 2 (1999), 782–802. 52

    1999

  9. [17]

    Hausenblas, E., and Giri, A. K. Stochastic Burgers equation with polynomial nonlin- earity driven by L´ evy process. Commun. Stoch. Anal. 7 , 1 (2013), 91–112

    2013

  10. [18]

    Taylor Approximations for Stochastic Partial Differential Equations, vol

    Jentzen, A., and Kloeden, P. Taylor Approximations for Stochastic Partial Differential Equations, vol. 83 of CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematic s. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelph ia, PA, 2012

    2012

  11. [19]

    On the Alekseev-Gr¨ obner formula in Banach spaces

    Jentzen, A., Lindner, F., and Pu ˇsnik, P. On the Alekseev-Gr¨ obner formula in Banach spaces. arXiv:1810.10030 (2018), 36 pages

    2018 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Exponential moments for numerical approximations of stochastic partial differential equations

    Jentzen, A., and Pu ˇsnik, P. Exponential moments for numerical approximations of stochastic partial differential equations. Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comput. 6 , 4 (2018), 565–617

    2018

  13. [21]

    Strong convergence rates for an explicit numer- ical approximation method for stochastic evolution equati ons with non-globally Lip- schitz continuous nonlinearities

    Jentzen, A., and Pu ˇsnik, P. Strong convergence rates for an explicit numer- ical approximation method for stochastic evolution equati ons with non-globally Lip- schitz continuous nonlinearities. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis (April 2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/imanum/d...

    2019 doi

  14. [22]

    Regularity analysis of stochastic partial differential equations with nonlinear multiplicative trace class noise

    Jentzen, A., and R ¨ockner, M. Regularity analysis of stochastic partial differential equations with nonlinear multiplicative trace class noise . J. Differential Equations 252 , 1 (2012), 114–136

    2012

  15. [23]

    Strong convergence for explicit space-time discrete numerical approximation methods for stochastic B urgers equations

    Jentzen, A., Salimova, D., and Welti, T. Strong convergence for explicit space-time discrete numerical approximation methods for stochastic B urgers equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 469 , 2 (2019), 661–704

    2019

  16. [24]

    Foundations of modern probability

    Kallenberg, O. Foundations of modern probability . Probability and its Applications (New York). Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997

    1997

  17. [25]

    Kim, J. U. On the stochastic Burgers equation with a polynomial nonlin earity in the real line. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 6 , 4 (2006), 835–866

    2006

  18. [26]

    Probability theory

    Klenke, A. Probability theory. Universitext. Springer-Verlag London Ltd., London, 2008 . A comprehensive course, Translated from the 2006 German ori ginal

    2008

  19. [27]

    E., and Neuenkirch, A

    Kloeden, P. E., and Neuenkirch, A. The pathwise convergence of approximation schemes for stochastic differential equations. LMS J. Comput. Math. 10 (2007), 235–253

    2007

  20. [28]

    Stochastic Burgers’ equation on the real line: regularity a nd moment estimates

    Lewis, P., and Nualart, D. Stochastic Burgers’ equation on the real line: regularity a nd moment estimates. Stochastics 90 , 7 (2018), 1053–1086

    2018

  21. [29]

    Stochastic partial differential equations: an introductio n

    Liu, W., and R ¨ockner, M. Stochastic partial differential equations: an introductio n. Universitext. Springer, Cham, 2015

    2015

  22. [30]

    Interpolation theory , vol

    Lunardi, A. Interpolation theory , vol. 16 of Appunti. Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa (Nuova Serie) [Lecture Notes. Scuola Normale Superiore di P isa (New Series)] . Edizioni della Normale, Pisa, 2018. Third edition [of MR2523200]. 53

    2018

  23. [31]

    Existence, uniqueness, and numerical approxima- tions for stochastic Burgers equations

    Mazzonetto, S., and Salimova, D. Existence, uniqueness, and numerical approxima- tions for stochastic Burgers equations. arXiv:1901.09288 (2019), 23 pages

    2019 arXiv

  24. [32]

    On elliptic partial differential equations

    Nirenberg, L. On elliptic partial differential equations. Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa (3) 13 (1959), 115–162

    1959

  25. [33]

    A concise course on stochastic partial differential equa- tions, vol

    Pr´ evˆot, C., and R ¨ockner, M. A concise course on stochastic partial differential equa- tions, vol. 1905 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics . Springer, Berlin, 2007

    1905

  26. [34]

    Local existence and non-explosion of solutions for stochastic fractional partial differential equations driv en by multiplicative noise

    R¨ockner, M., Zhu, R., and Zhu, X. Local existence and non-explosion of solutions for stochastic fractional partial differential equations driv en by multiplicative noise. Stochastic Process. Appl. 124 , 5 (2014), 1974–2002

    2014

  27. [35]

    Rozovski˘ı, B. L. Stochastic evolution systems , vol. 35 of Mathematics and its Applications (Soviet Series) . Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, 1990. Linea r theory and applications to nonlinear filtering, Translated from the Ru ssian by A. Yarkho

    1990

  28. [36]

    Searc´oid, M. O. Metric spaces . Springer Undergraduate Mathematics Series. Springer- Verlag London, Ltd., London, 2007

    2007

  29. [37]

    R., and You, Y

    Sell, G. R., and You, Y. Dynamics of evolutionary equations , vol. 143 of Applied Math- ematical Sciences. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002

    2002

  30. [38]

    Interpolation theory, function spaces, differential opera tors, vol

    Triebel, H. Interpolation theory, function spaces, differential opera tors, vol. 18 of North- Holland Mathematical Library . North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam-New York, 1978

    1978

  31. [39]

    W alsh, J. B. An introduction to stochastic partial differential equatio ns, vol. 1180 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics . Springer, Berlin, 1986

    1986

  32. [40]

    Regularities for semilinear stochastic partial differenti al equations

    Zhang, X. Regularities for semilinear stochastic partial differenti al equations. J. Funct. Anal. 249 , 2 (2007), 454–476. 54

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.