Hallmarks of spin textures for high-harmonic generation in two-dimensional materials

Carmine Ortix; Filomena Forte; Francesco Gabriele; Mario Cuoco

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 45 references

Hallmarks of spin textures for high-harmonic generation in two-dimensional materials

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Even-order high harmonics in 2D non-centrosymmetric materials require a spin texture that breaks twofold rotational symmetry, and, when time-reversal symmetry is present, a nonzero Berry curvature.

desk verdict The paper's central claim that a C2-invariant spin texture forbids even-order harmonics is false as stated; the Hamiltonian-level rule is correct but the overreach needs major revision. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.04545 v3 pith:GBPJ5OQG submitted 2025-01-08 cond-mat.str-el

Francesco Gabriele , Carmine Ortix , Mario Cuoco , Filomena Forte This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.str-el

keywords high-harmonicgenerationspintextureBerrycurvaturetwofoldrotationalsymmetryselectionrulesspin-orbitcouplingnon-centrosymmetricmaterialsdynamicalbreaking

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

High-harmonic generation in a solid exposes which symmetries the material breaks. This paper studies two-dimensional non-centrosymmetric materials and asks what controls the emission of even-order harmonics, the multiples of the laser frequency that are absent whenever inversion symmetry survives. The authors consider the momentum-space spin texture—the pattern of spin directions over the Brillouin zone—and establish that a spin texture invariant under a twofold rotation about the out-of-plane axis always suppresses even-order harmonics, so breaking that rotational symmetry in the spin texture is necessary for their appearance. Under time-reversal symmetry, they add a second condition: the band-resolved Berry curvature—the momentum-space curvature of the band geometry—must be nonzero. These rules turn the harmonic spectrum into a symmetry probe, with explicit model calculations showing how static or dynamically driven symmetry breaking switches even-order harmonics on and off.

What carries the argument

The central object is the dynamical symmetry: a static point-group operation $\hat{P}$ combined with a time translation $\hat{T}_{\tau}$ that leaves the driven Hamiltonian invariant, because the vector potential transforms under the time translation exactly as the momentum transforms under $\hat{P}$. For a monochromatic drive of period $T$, this yields the selection rule $P J_n = e^{i\Omega\tau} J_n^{(*)}$ (Eq. 2), where $P$ is the $2\times2$ matrix action of $\hat{P}$ on the current and the star marks anti-unitary operations. For $\hat{C}_2$, $\tau=T/2$ and $P=-1$, giving $J_n=(-1)^{n+1}J_n$ and hence the vanishing of even harmonics; the same rotation determines the spin-texture transformation. The Berry-curvature result uses a separate mechanism: the Boltzmann equation for band-resolved density matrices in the length gauge, with the optical current split into intraband, interband, and anomalous velocity $v^{(\mathrm{anom})}_{k\mu\nu}=-E\times\Omega_{k\mu\nu}$, and a gauge choice that converts zero Berry curvature into a half-period anti-symmetry of the current.

What would settle it

Measure the harmonic spectrum of a 2D non-centrosymmetric material whose spin texture is known from spin-resolved photoemission to be $\hat{C}_2$-invariant; a nonzero even-order harmonic would falsify Eq. (3). For the Berry-curvature claim, one would look for a time-reversal-invariant two-band system with a $\hat{C}_2$-broken spin texture and identically zero band Berry curvature, and check whether even-order harmonics appear.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's core claim is a selection rule connecting the momentum-space spin texture to the parity of allowed harmonic orders. For a 2D non-centrosymmetric system of spin-1/2 fermions with no residual $U(1)$ spin symmetry, $\hat{C}_2$-invariance of the undriven Hamiltonian implies $J_n = (-1)^{n+1}J_n$ for the $n$-th harmonic current, so all even-order harmonics vanish (Eq. 3); the same symmetry makes the in-plane spin texture odd under momentum reversal, $\boldsymbol{\sigma}^{xy}_{-k}=-\boldsymbol{\sigma}^{xy}_k$, with $\sigma^z_{-k}=\sigma^z_k$ (Eq. 4). A $\hat{C}_2$-broken spin texture is therefore necessary for even-order emission. The second claim is that in time-reversal-invariant systems the Berry curvature must not vanish: if $\Omega_{k\mu\mu}=0$ for every band, a gauge can be chosen in which the Berry connection is purely imaginary, and time-reversal then forces $J(t+T/2)=-J(t)$, killing all even-order harmonics (Eq. 10). The proof of this second statement is given for two-band systems; the paper notes that with more bands the algebra generally prevents zero Berry curvature once $\hat{C}_2$ is broken. Explicit calculations on a trigonal time-reversal-invariant model and on an antiferromagnetic square-lattice model confirm the rules, and a time-periodic $\hat{C}_2$-breaking field is shown to modulate even-order harmonic amplitudes with its driving frequency.

Load-bearing premise

The Berry-curvature half of the central claim—that vanishing band Berry curvature forbids even-order harmonics in time-reversal-invariant systems—is proved only for two-band spin-1/2 models, and the paper's own footnote states that for more degrees of freedom the algebra generally prevents zero Berry curvature once $\hat{C}_2$ is broken, so the general necessity is not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

In any 2D non-centrosymmetric material whose spin texture is invariant under $\hat{C}_2$, the high-harmonic spectrum will contain no even-order harmonics, independent of the polarization of the driving field.
Even-order harmonic intensity can act as a switch-like probe of rotational symmetry breaking: restoring $\hat{C}_2$ symmetry in the spin texture, through a phase transition or a tuning parameter, should drive the even-order harmonics to zero.
In time-reversal-invariant two-band systems, even-order harmonics require both a $\hat{C}_2$-broken spin texture and nonzero band-resolved Berry curvature; a vanishing Berry curvature suppresses them even when $\hat{C}_2$ is broken.
In time-reversal-broken systems, even-order harmonics can survive with zero Berry curvature, so the spin-texture rotation symmetry, not the Berry curvature, is the controlling factor there.
A time-periodic $\hat{C}_2$-breaking field modulates even-order harmonic amplitudes as a function of the driving frequency, with order-$n$ harmonics enhanced near $n\Omega_{\mathrm{pump}}\sim\Omega_{\mathrm{drive}}$, allowing HHG to detect symmetry breaking that second-harmonic generation misses.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A direct experimental test would be to monitor even-order harmonic intensity while continuously tuning a parameter that controls the $\hat{C}_2$-breaking part of the spin texture, such as a warping term; the harmonics should switch on exactly at the symmetry-breaking point.
Because the Berry-curvature suppression is proven only for two-band systems, a useful next step is to search for a multiband time-reversal-invariant material with a $\hat{C}_2$-broken spin texture and identically zero band Berry curvature, and check whether even-order harmonics still vanish.
The same symmetry conditions that permit even-order harmonics also govern the nonlinear Hall effect, so combining HHG spectroscopy with nonlinear Hall transport on the same material could cross-identify rotational-symmetry-breaking electronic phases.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague,

The punchline: the paper's central claim — that C2-invariance of the spin texture forbids even-order harmonics — is false as stated. The correct statement is the one they derive: if the Hamiltonian is C2-invariant, even harmonics vanish. The converse does not follow. Their Eqs. (3) and (4) are one-way implications, and the spin texture does not uniquely determine the Hamiltonian. A simple counterexample: take a two-band spin-orbit Hamiltonian h(k) = f(k)(sin k_x, sin k_y, 0) with f(k) = 1 + α sin k_x + β sin k_y. For the occupied band, the spin texture is independent of f, so it is C2-invariant in their sense. But H0 is not C2-invariant when α, β ≠ 0, and even harmonics are generically allowed. The model has zero Berry curvature, no residual U(1) spin symmetry, and breaks time reversal. So the abstract's "necessarily requires" is simply wrong.

That said, the paper is not a write-off. The Hamiltonian-level selection rules in Appendix B are correctly derived (modulo a typo in Eq. (2) that drops the harmonic order n in the phase factor). The model calculations in Figs. 2 and 3 illustrate the symmetry breaking cleanly, and the insets showing even-harmonic intensity scaling to zero as the breaking parameter vanishes are consistent with the correct one-way implication. The Berry curvature section is also interesting, but it is explicitly restricted to two-band systems in footnote 31; the main text presents it as general, which overstates it.

So the soft spots are proportional: the central logical flaw is load-bearing, the Berry curvature overgeneralization is real but clearly bounded, and the typo is minor. The citation pattern is fine — the authors credit Lysne et al. and Neufeld et al. for the underlying selection rules.

Who should read this? Someone working on HHG selection rules who wants to see a nicely organized derivation of the Hamiltonian-level rules and a cautionary example of how spin-texture language can mislead. It is not a reliable reference for the "spin texture criterion" they advertise.

Recommendation: if this lands on a desk, it should go to peer review — not because the current version is close to acceptable, but because a serious referee can identify the overclaim and the authors may be able to salvage the correct parts with a major revision. But the paper as it stands should not be published without fixing the central claim.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper investigates the relationship between spin textures, Berry curvature, and high-harmonic generation (HHG) in two-dimensional non-centrosymmetric systems, focusing on conditions for even-order harmonic emission. The authors derive selection rules using dynamical symmetries and conclude that a C2-invariant spin texture forbids even-order harmonics, while broken C2 symmetry in the spin texture is necessary for their emergence; they further claim that in time-reversal-invariant systems a vanishing Berry curvature also forbids even-order harmonics. They support these claims with a trigonal-lattice model with Rashba and trigonal-warping terms, a square-lattice antiferromagnetic model with charge imbalance, and a model with dynamically broken C2 symmetry.

Significance. If the central claims were correct, the paper would provide a broadly applicable symmetry diagnostic: spin-texture patterns would directly predict even-order HHG activity, with relevance for oxide interfaces, altermagnets, kagome systems, and dynamical symmetry breaking. The paper has genuine strengths: it presents a self-contained dynamical-symmetry derivation, explicit microscopic model calculations, and insets showing even-harmonic intensities vanishing as the symmetry-breaking parameters λ and Δε go to zero, which is a clear falsifiable trend. However, the main selection-rule implication is reversed in the central claim, and the Berry-curvature statement is only proved for two-band systems despite being presented as general; these issues undermine the paper's central theses.

major comments (1)

[Section II, Role of the Berry curvature, Eq. (10) and footnote 31] The proposition that in time-reversal-invariant systems a vanishing Berry curvature forbids even-order harmonics is stated without qualification in the main text and abstract, but the proof is a sketch that, as footnote 31 concedes, holds only for two-band systems. For systems with more than two bands, the gauge choice that makes all off-diagonal Berry connections purely imaginary is not generally possible, and the relation ρ_{-kμν}(t+T/2)=ρ_{kμν}(t) for all band pairs is not established. Since the abstract's second necessary condition depends on this implication, the general version of Eq. (10) is not proven. The authors should either provide a multi-band proof or explicitly restrict the claim to two-band systems throughout the main text and abstract.

minor comments (4)

[Equation (2)] The phase factor in Eq. (2) should be e^{i n Ω τ}, not e^{i Ω τ}; as written, the constraint is independent of harmonic order and is inconsistent with the correct result in Eq. (B1).
[Equation (13) and surrounding text] In Eq. (13), the term denoted h^{(y)}_k = B_z should presumably be h^{(z)}_k = B_z; the text describes a static magnetic field along the z axis, but the equation labels it as a y component.
[Appendix C] There are typos in Appendix C: 'natural natural' should be 'natural', and 'convenenient' should be 'convenient'.
[Section II, vertical mirrors] The comparison between Eq. (5) and the spin-texture transformation under vertical mirrors is stated without derivation; providing a brief derivation analogous to Eq. (4) would improve clarity and verify the claimed correspondence.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the HHG selection rules are derived from dynamical-symmetry constraints, and the numerical results are parameter scans rather than fitted predictions; the main caveats are validity/overgeneralization issues, not circular self-reference.

full rationale

The paper's central even-harmonic suppression rules are not fitted or defined into existence. Equation (3) follows from the stated dynamical symmetry C2 ⊗ T_{T/2} for a C2-invariant H0, and Eq. (10) is a separate argument from vanishing Berry curvature plus time-reversal symmetry; neither quantity is adjusted to enforce the target harmonic intensities. The model Hamiltonians in Sec. III use specified parameters (γ_R, λ, Δε, B) chosen to illustrate symmetry breaking, and the insets scan those parameters to zero, demonstrating a symmetry-controlled trend rather than fitting a prediction. The self-citations (Refs. [6,7,12,17,19]) provide context and material examples, but the load-bearing derivation does not reduce to them. Two validity caveats are present but are not circularity. First, the statement after Eq. (4) that a C2-invariant spin texture forbids even-order harmonics reverses the one-way implications in Eqs. (3)-(4); this is a logical-reversal/correctness concern, not an equation reducing to its input. Second, footnote 31 explicitly limits the Berry-curvature result to two-band systems, so the abstract's blanket wording overstates the proven scope; again this is overgeneralization, not circular self-reference. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained and no prediction is equivalent by construction to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard symmetry arguments and a few domain assumptions. The listed free parameters are illustrative controls in the model calculations, not fitted values: the insets demonstrate that even harmonics vanish when the relevant symmetry-breaking parameter goes to zero. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)

trigonal warping λ = 0.1 (in units of t)
Chosen for the numerical illustration of the trigonal model to break C2; the inset shows even harmonics vanish at λ=0, so it is a control parameter, not fitted.
charge imbalance Δε = 0.1 (in units of t)
Chosen for the antiferromagnetic square-lattice model to break C2; even harmonics vanish at Δε=0 in the inset.
Rashba coupling γ_R = 0.1 (trigonal), 0.1 (square), 0.02 (dynamic)
Sets the spin-orbit scale; chosen as representative of realistic interfaces, not fitted.
Effective magnetic fields B, B_z, B_x = 0.1 (square), 0.15 and 0.1 (dynamic)
Chosen to break time-reversal or to drive dynamical C2 breaking; illustrative, not fitted.

assumptions (4)

standard math The optical response can be computed from the current density via the Peierls substitution in the velocity gauge and the Boltzmann/density-matrix equation (Appendix A and C).
Standard semiclassical and Floquet formalism for solid-state HHG; assumptions stated in Appendix A.
domain assumption There is no residual U(1) spin symmetry, so a well-defined momentum-dependent spin texture exists.
Stated in Section II: the system has SOC and broken horizontal mirror symmetry, giving spin textures as ground-state averages.
domain assumption The system is assumed to have two degrees of freedom (spin-1/2) for the Berry curvature-zero result.
Footnote 31 explicitly restricts the zero-Berry-curvature suppression of even harmonics to spin-1/2 two-band systems.
domain assumption Scattering effects are neglected (infinite relaxation time).
Stated in the Conclusions; the authors expect no qualitative change but acknowledge it may shape realistic spectra.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hallmarks of spin textures for high-harmonic generation in two-dimensional materials." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GBPJ5OQG

@misc{pith2026250104545,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hallmarks of spin textures for high-harmonic generation in two-dimensional materials},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GBPJ5OQG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.04545}
}

read the original abstract

Spin-orbit coupling and quantum geometry are fundamental aspects in modern condensed matter physics, with their primary manifestations in momentum space being spin textures and Berry curvature. In this work, we investigate their interplay with high-harmonic generation (HHG) in two-dimensional non-centrosymmetric materials, with an emphasis on even-order harmonics. Our analysis reveals that the emergence of finite even-order harmonics necessarily requires a broken twofold rotational symmetry in the spin texture, as well as a non-trivial Berry curvature in systems with time-reversal invariance. This symmetry breaking can arise across various degrees of freedom and impact both spin textures and optical response via spin-orbit interactions. We also show that HHG is particularly sensitive to dynamical rotational-symmetry breaking, as even high-order components can be modulated by a time-dependent symmetry breaking. These findings underscore the potential of HHG as a tool for exploring electronic phases with broken rotational symmetry, as well as the associated phase transitions in two-dimensional materials, and provide novel perspectives for designing symmetry-dependent nonlinear optical phenomena.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.04545 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Spin textures and high-harmonic response for different physical configurations. Schematic illustration of the trigonal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Dependence of even-order harmonics on the driving frequency. Amplitudes of the second- (blue), fourth- (green), sixth- (red) and eighth-order harmonics are shown as functions of the ratio between the driving frequency and the pump frequency. The parameters are set to Ωpump = 0.1, γR = 0.02, Bz = 0.15, Bx = 0.1 and µ = 0.9. increases, their amplitude grows, with the second-order harmonic being dominant only around Ω… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

[1]

Figure 2

0.5 0.1 Δϵ . Figure 2. Spin textures and high-harmonic response for different physical configurations. Schematic illustration of the trigonal lattice (a) with threefold rotational symmetry and antiferromagnetic pattern (d) with broken twofold rotational symmetry. Both systems possess a vertical mirror symmetryMx along thex-axis, and in both cases, the inc...

work page
[2]

Ghimire, A

S. Ghimire, A. D. DiChiara, E. Sistrunk, P. Agostini, L. F. DiMauro, and D. A. Reis, Observation of high-order harmonic generation in a bulk crystal, Nature physics7, 138 (2011)

2011
[3]

H. A. Hafez, S. Kovalev, J.-C. Deinert, Z. Mics, B. Green, N. Awari, M. Chen, S. Germanskiy, U. Lehn- ert, J. Teichert, Z. Wang, K.-J. Tielrooij, Z. Liu, Z. Chen, A. Narita, K. Mullen, M. Bonn, M. Gensch, and D. Turchinovich, Extremely efficient terahertz high- harmonic generation in graphene by hot dirac fermions, Nature561, 507 (2018)

work page 2018
[4]

Rashba, Properties of semiconductors with an ex- tremum loop

E. Rashba, Properties of semiconductors with an ex- tremum loop. i. cyclotron and combinational resonance in a magnetic field perpendicular to the plane of the loop, Sov. Phys.-Solid State2, 1109 (1960)

work page 1960
[5]

Dresselhaus, Spin-orbit coupling effects in zinc blende structures, Phys

G. Dresselhaus, Spin-orbit coupling effects in zinc blende structures, Phys. Rev.100, 580 (1955)

1955
[6]

Xiao, M.-C

D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1959 (2010)

2010
[7]

M. T. Mercaldo, C. Noce, A. D. Caviglia, M. Cuoco, and C. Ortix, Orbital design of Berry curvature: pinch points and giant dipoles induced by crystal fields, npj Quantum Materials8, 12 (2023)

2023
[8]

Lesne, Y

E. Lesne, Y. G. Saglam, R. Battilomo, M. T. Mercaldo, T. C. van Thiel, U. Filippozzi, C. Noce, M. Cuoco, G. A. Steele, C. Ortix,et al., Designing spin and orbital sources of Berry curvature at oxide interfaces, Nature Materials 22, 576 (2023)

work page 2023

Show all 45 references

[9]

Soumyanarayanan, N

A. Soumyanarayanan, N. Reyren, A. Fert, and C. Panagopoulos, Emergent phenomena induced by spin– orbit coupling at surfaces and interfaces, Nature539, 509 (2016)

2016
[10]

Premasiri and X

K. Premasiri and X. P. Gao, Tuning spin–orbit coupling in 2D materials for spintronics: a topical review, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter31, 193001 (2019)

2019
[11]

Manchon, H

A. Manchon, H. C. Koo, J. Nitta, S. M. Frolov, and R. A. Duine, New perspectives for Rashba spin-orbit coupling, Nature Materials14, 871 (2015)

2015
[12]

Y. Ren, Z. Qiao, and Q. Niu, Topological phases in two- dimensional materials: a review, Reports on Progress in Physics79, 066501 (2016)

2016
[13]

Salikhov, M

R. Salikhov, M. Lysne, P. Werner, I. Ilyakov, M. Schuler, T.V.A.G.deOliveira, A.Ponomaryov, A.Arshad, G.L. Prajapati, J.-C. Deinert, P. Makushko, D. Makarov, T. Cowan, J. Fassbender, J. Lindner, A. Lindner, C. Or- tix, and S. Kovalev, Spin-orbit interaction driven tera- hertz ...

2025
[14]

T. T. Luu and H. J. Wörner, Measurement of the Berry curvatureofsolidsusinghigh-harmonicspectroscopy,Na- ture communications9, 916 (2018)

2018
[15]

Avetissian and G

H. Avetissian and G. Mkrtchian, High laser harmonics induced by the Berry curvature in time-reversal invariant materials, Physical Review B102, 245422 (2020)

2020
[16]

Z. Lou, Y. Zheng, C. Liu, Z. Zeng, R. Li, and Z. Xu, Controlling of the harmonic generation induced by the Berry curvature, Optics Express29, 37809 (2021)

2021
[17]

Yue and M

L. Yue and M. B. Gaarde, Characterizing anomalous high-harmonic generation in solids, Physical Review Let- ters130, 166903 (2023)

2023
[18]

Ortix, Nonlinear Hall effect with time-reversal symme- try: Theory and material realizations, Advanced Quan- tum Technologies4, 2100056 (2021)

C. Ortix, Nonlinear Hall effect with time-reversal symme- try: Theory and material realizations, Advanced Quan- tum Technologies4, 2100056 (2021)

2021
[19]

Sodemann and L

I. Sodemann and L. Fu, Quantum nonlinear hall effect induced by Berry curvature dipole in time-reversal in- variant materials, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 216806 (2015)

2015
[20]

Makushko, S

P. Makushko, S. Kovalev, Y. Zabila, I. Ilyakov, A. Pono- maryov, A. Arshad, G. L. Prajapati, T. V. A. G. de Oliveira, J.-C. Deinert, P. Chekhonin, I. Veremchuk, T. Kosub, Y. Skourski, F. Ganss, D. Makarov, and C. Or- tix, A tunable room-temperature nonlinear Hall effect in ele...

2024 arXiv
[21]

Ma, S.-Y

Q. Ma, S.-Y. Xu, H. Shen, D. MacNeill, V. Fatemi, T.-R. Chang, A. M. Mier Valdivia, S. Wu, Z. Du, C.-H. Hsu, S. Fang, Q. D. Gibson, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. J. Cava, E. Kaxiras, H.-Z. Lu, H. Lin, L. Fu, N. Gedik, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Observation of the nonlinear hall e...

2019
[22]

Orenstein, J

J. Orenstein, J. Moore, T. Morimoto, D. Torchinsky, J.Harter,andD.Hsieh,Topologyandsymmetryofquan- tum materials via nonlinear optical responses, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics12, 247 (2021)

2021
[23]

Lysne, Y

M. Lysne, Y. Murakami, M. Schüler, and P. Werner, High-harmonic generation in spin-orbit coupled systems, Physical Review B102, 081121 (2020)

2020
[24]

Fiebig, V

M. Fiebig, V. V. Pavlov, and R. V. Pisarev, Second- harmonic generation as a tool for studying electronic and magnetic structures of crystals, JOSA B22, 96 (2005)

2005
[25]

Z. Sun, Y. Yi, T. Song, G. Clark, B. Huang, Y. Shan, S. Wu, D. Huang, C. Gao, Z. Chen,et al., Giant nonre- ciprocal second-harmonic generation from antiferromag- netic bilayer CrI3, Nature572, 497 (2019)

2019
[26]

Xiao, D.-F

R.-C. Xiao, D.-F. Shao, W. Gan, H.-W. Wang, H. Han, Z. Sheng, C. Zhang, H. Jiang, and H. Li, Classification of second harmonic generation effect in magnetically or- dered materials, npj Quantum Materials8, 62 (2023). 10

2023
[27]

Šmejkal, A

L. Šmejkal, A. H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, S. Nakatsuji, andT.Jungwirth,AnomalousHallantiferromagnets,Na- ture Reviews Materials7, 482 (2022)

2022
[28]

M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, and A. Jorio,Group theory: application to the physics of condensed matter (Springer Science & Business Media, 2007)

2007
[29]

Janssen, A

T. Janssen, A. Janner, and E. Ascher, Crystallographic groups in space and time: I. general definitions and basic properties, Physica41, 541 (1969)

1969
[30]

O. E. Alon, V. Averbukh, and N. Moiseyev, Selection rules for the high harmonic generation spectra, Physical review letters80, 3743 (1998)

1998
[31]

Neufeld, D

O. Neufeld, D. Podolsky, and O. Cohen, Floquet group theory and its application to selection rules in harmonic generation, Nature communications10, 405 (2019)

2019
[32]

Such a result holds true for systems with two degrees of freedom, e.g., spin-1/2electrons; for larger numbers of degrees of freedom, the richer algebra generally prevents situations where Berry curvature vanishes ifˆC2-rotational symmetry is broken, apartfrom a few specific ca...
[33]

Aversa and J

C. Aversa and J. E. Sipe, Nonlinear optical susceptibili- ties of semiconductors: Results with a length-gauge anal- ysis, Physical Review B52, 14636 (1995)

1995
[34]

Varotto, A

S. Varotto, A. Johansson, B. Göbel, L. M. Vicente-Arche, S. Mallik, J. Bréhin, R. Salazar, F. Bertran, P. L. Fèvre, N. Bergeal,et al., Direct visualization of Rashba-split bands and spin/orbital-charge interconversion at KTaO3 interfaces, Nature Communications13, 6165 (2022)

2022
[35]

H. Yuan, M. S. Bahramy, K. Morimoto, S. Wu, K. No- mura, B.-J. Yang, H. Shimotani, R. Suzuki, M. Toh, C. Kloc,et al., Zeeman-type spin splitting controlled by an electric field, Nature Physics9, 563 (2013)

2013
[36]

M. U. Farooq, L. Xian, and L. Huang, Spin hall effect in two-dimensional inse: Interplay between rashba and dresselhaus spin-orbit couplings, Physical Review B105, 245405 (2022)

2022
[37]

Vampa, C

G. Vampa, C. McDonald, G. Orlando, D. Klug, P. Corkum, and T. Brabec, Theoretical analysis of high- harmonic generation in solids, Physical review letters 113, 073901 (2014)

2014
[38]

Vampa, C

G. Vampa, C. McDonald, G. Orlando, P. Corkum, and T. Brabec, Semiclassical analysis of high harmonic gen- eration in bulk crystals, Physical Review B91, 064302 (2015)

2015
[39]

T. T. Luu and H. J. Wörner, High-order harmonic gen- eration in solids: A unifying approach, Physical Review B94, 115164 (2016)

2016
[40]

Zhang, B

H. Zhang, B. D. Oli, Q. Zou, X. Guo, Z. Wang, and L. Li, Visualizing symmetry-breaking electronic orders in epi- taxial kagome magnet FeSn films, Nature Communica- tions14, 6167 (2023)

2023
[41]

Wang, B.-F

J. Wang, B.-F. Zhu, and R.-B. Liu, Second-order nonlin- ear optical effects of spin currents, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 256601 (2010)

2010
[42]

L. K. Werake and H. Zhao, Observation of second- harmonic generation induced by pure spin currents, Na- ture Physics6, 875 (2010)

2010
[43]

S. G. Jeong, I. H. Choi, S. Nair, L. Buiarelli, B. Pour- bahari, J. Y. Oh, N. Bassim, A. Seo, W. S. Choi, R. M. Fernandes, T. Birol, L. Zhao, J. S. Lee, and B.Jalan,Altermagneticpolarmetallicphaseinultra-thin epitaxially-strained RuO2 films (2024), arXiv:2405.05838 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

2024 arXiv
[44]

Grifoni and P

M. Grifoni and P. Hänggi, Driven quantum tunneling, Physics Reports304, 229 (1998)

1998
[45]

Mandl and G

F. Mandl and G. Shaw,Quantum field theory(John Wi- ley & Sons, 2010)

2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Figure 2

0.5 0.1 Δϵ . Figure 2. Spin textures and high-harmonic response for different physical configurations. Schematic illustration of the trigonal lattice (a) with threefold rotational symmetry and antiferromagnetic pattern (d) with broken twofold rotational symmetry. Both systems possess a vertical mirror symmetryMx along thex-axis, and in both cases, the inc...

work page

[2] [2]

Ghimire, A

S. Ghimire, A. D. DiChiara, E. Sistrunk, P. Agostini, L. F. DiMauro, and D. A. Reis, Observation of high-order harmonic generation in a bulk crystal, Nature physics7, 138 (2011)

2011

[3] [3]

H. A. Hafez, S. Kovalev, J.-C. Deinert, Z. Mics, B. Green, N. Awari, M. Chen, S. Germanskiy, U. Lehn- ert, J. Teichert, Z. Wang, K.-J. Tielrooij, Z. Liu, Z. Chen, A. Narita, K. Mullen, M. Bonn, M. Gensch, and D. Turchinovich, Extremely efficient terahertz high- harmonic generation in graphene by hot dirac fermions, Nature561, 507 (2018)

work page 2018

[4] [4]

Rashba, Properties of semiconductors with an ex- tremum loop

E. Rashba, Properties of semiconductors with an ex- tremum loop. i. cyclotron and combinational resonance in a magnetic field perpendicular to the plane of the loop, Sov. Phys.-Solid State2, 1109 (1960)

work page 1960

[5] [5]

Dresselhaus, Spin-orbit coupling effects in zinc blende structures, Phys

G. Dresselhaus, Spin-orbit coupling effects in zinc blende structures, Phys. Rev.100, 580 (1955)

1955

[6] [6]

Xiao, M.-C

D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1959 (2010)

2010

[7] [7]

M. T. Mercaldo, C. Noce, A. D. Caviglia, M. Cuoco, and C. Ortix, Orbital design of Berry curvature: pinch points and giant dipoles induced by crystal fields, npj Quantum Materials8, 12 (2023)

2023

[8] [8]

Lesne, Y

E. Lesne, Y. G. Saglam, R. Battilomo, M. T. Mercaldo, T. C. van Thiel, U. Filippozzi, C. Noce, M. Cuoco, G. A. Steele, C. Ortix,et al., Designing spin and orbital sources of Berry curvature at oxide interfaces, Nature Materials 22, 576 (2023)

work page 2023